Upload
sun
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Contents
1 Introduction: short yiqtol and its “problem” 2 Methodology3 Evidence
synchronicdetecting a path
diachroniccomparativetypological
4 Conclusion – dynamic model
1.2 Systematic relations
Short yiqtol vs. long yiqtol
formal coincidence – no genetic relation
Short yiqtol vs. wayyiqtol
genetic relation < PS *yaqtul
1.3 “Problem”
Genetic relation but semantic dissimilarity
wayyiqtol indicative perfect, perfective and past narrative
short yiqtol modal discursive
This “paradox” may be explained if we employ a dynamic method/approach/perspective
Methodology
Synchronic semantic heterogeneity (polysemy) =
- manifestation of a diachronic process
- logical homogenous whole (map)
- direct diachronic chaining chaining by means of universal evolutionary scenarios (paths)
2.1 Dynamic approach
2.2 Panchronic methodology
synchronic evidence taxonomy of senses
diachronic evidence origin and posterior development
comparative evidence grams in cognate languages
typological evidence behavior of typologically similar grams
Gram = (a portion) of a path (cluster of paths)
2.3 Back to the problem
How can the -yiqtol morphology constitute a rational phenomenon?
Dynamic connection between the short yiqtol and the wayyiqtol?
Is the path representation of the wayyiqtol compatible with the path representation of the short yiqtol?
3.1 Synchronicdesiderative-volitional: orders, requests and blessings
3rd - jussiveprohibitive
2nd - jussive/imperative/optative sense (infrequently) prohibitive
1st - (suspect and uncertain)
final/purposive value = “subjunctive”
discourse-pragmatic: foreground form of the direct discourse
Evidence
Syntactic environment
Neutral environment
the modal force is conveyed by the gram itself
Modal environment
accompanied by modal particles (אל and נָא)following another directive form (e.g. jussive, imperative or cohortative) introduced by the particle ְו
Summary
Short yiqtol = an undeniable modal gram an optative (jussive-prohibitive-imperative) final sense in dependent clauses encountered both in overtly modal and modally neutral milieus
3.2 Detecting the path
modal constructions
< properly modal paths (ability, obligation, desire)
< a modal contamination
Synchronic evidence is not conclusive!
3.3 Diachronic evidence
The short yiqtol and the -yiqtol in the wayyiqtol < PS *yaqtul
wayyiqtol < PS *yáqtul short yiqtol < PS *yaqtúl
PS *yaqtul < a verbal resultative/perfective adjective/participle
*q(a)tal+ personal pronouns (y-, t-, and n-)
The short yiqtol and the -yiqtol of the wayyiqtol share their origin
> the modal value of the short yiqtol is not genetic > it derives from “external” factors > it stems form a modal contamination
3.4 Comparative evidence
(1) the successors of the *yaqtul = resultative path and modal path
(2) modal values are contextually induced
Akkadian liprus, ayyiprus and iprus <<< PS *yaqtul
iprus present perfect, perfective, past, stative
edûm and išûm with lū: imperative and precativein conditional protases: hypothetical-modalwhen the apodosis is not expressed: optative
l-iprus jussive, cohortative, imperative of the 1st and 3rd final/purposive sense
ayy-iprus ‘vetitive’, negative desires and mild prohibitions
Arabic
yaqtul < PS *yaqtul
lam(mā) yaqtul present perfect, past and pluperfect
the modal yaqtul cohortative (1st) , jussive (3rd) prohibitive with the particle lā ال final sense (following an imperative)
frequently preceded by ل orفل in conditional protases and apodoseswith the particle lā ال
3.5 Typological evidence
A single form:
resultative path senses (perfect, past) modal path senses (jussive, optative and cohortative)
is not infrequent or typologically rare
Mandinka ŋa/ye tenseSemitic qatal(a)
4.1 ResultsThe short yiqtol = an advanced portion of the modal contamination path
The *yaqtul of the resultative cline > re-shaped as a fused periphrasis (wayyiqtol, cf. Ar. lam yaqtul <---> Akk. iprus)
The “simple” *yaqtul > specialized as a modal gramthe modal sense is indissoluble from the construction
(short yiqtol, cf. Ar. yaqtul <---> Akk. liprus and ayyiprus)
Conclusion