Web 2.0

Web Web .0.0 Web:Web:Spinning a New Thread

Ismail FayedIsmail Fayedismailfayed@yahoo.com

Sunday, 11 February 2007, 01:00:pm

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 2

Overview• PLLE.. new trends and potentials• Web 2.0 technologies• Web 2.0 for educators• A gateway for learner’s autonomy and folksonomy..

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 3

The Internet Now and Before..

The only thing that I learned recently is using the open source systems on the internet which opened a lot of horizons for interacting and communicating knowledge and software with people around the world.

Rana Kais (2007)

5 years ago the internet to me was for information, music and emails. Today I use it for shopping, doing research, studying, shopping,getting movies, communicating, watching movies, playing chess, letters, ....... almost every thing. I now travel with a laptop.

Murray Grant (2007)

5 Yrs ago just a resource for teaching only, but now it’s related to everything around me. It’s part of my daily life.

Khawla Tarish (2007)

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 4

What’s Web 2.0?

On Sep. 2005, Tim O’Reilly wrote apiece summarizing the subject. The min-map pictured here (constructed by Markus Angermeier on Nov. 11, 2005) sums up the memes of Web 2.0, with example-sites and services attached.

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 5

What’s Web 2.0?

Flexbeta, (2006) “What is Web 2.0?”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc

3 Minutes

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 6

Examples

• R/A: Rich Turn-up Appications turning the data from the desktop to the browser (flash, Ajax)

• SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture (Feeds, RSS, Web-services, Mash-ups)

• The Social Web: by the help of the endend--useruser. The user is more of a participant.. (tagging – wiki –blogging – podcasting)

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 7

Web 2.0 for Educators• Collaborative, social, and personal..

A folksonomy is an Internet-based information retrievalmethodology consisting of collaboratively generated, open-ended labels that categorize content such as Web pages, online photographs, and Web links.

A folksonomy is most notably contrasted from a taxonomy in that the authors of the labeling system are often the main users (and sometimes originators) of the content to which the labels are applied. The labels are commonly known as tagsand the labeling process is called tagging…

In contrast to professionally developed taxonomies with controlled vocabularies, folksonomies are unsystematic and, from an information scientist's point of view, undependable and inconsistent; however, for Internet users, they dramatically lower content categorization costs because there is no hierarchically organized nomenclature to learn. One simply makes tags up on the fly

The Social Web provides:

• Feedback• Interaction• “data”

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 8

What’s Web 2.0?

Web 2.0 visual summary, by O’Reilly (2006)

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 9

What’s Web 2.0?

Web 2.0 Ad!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmo1ef7tVso

2 Minutes

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 10

Internet Evolution

Syndication-->stickiness

tagging ("folksonomy")-->directories (taxonomy)

wikis-->content management systems

participation-->publishing

web services-->screen scraping

cost per click-->page views

search engine optimization-->domain name speculation

upcoming.org and EVDB-->evite

blogging-->personal websites

Wikipedia-->Britannica Online

Napster-->mp3.com

BitTorrent-->Akamai

Flickr-->Ofoto

Google AdSense-->DoubleClick

Web 2.0Web 1.0

Today's Internet looks quite different from what many investors pictured just five years ago. Thomas Baker (1999)

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 11

Features of the .0..

Few limitedLimited

Free range learnerInstitutional learner

personalInstitutional

Loosely structuredHighly structured

Learner directedTeacher-administered

Open territoryWalled garden

ParticipationConsumerism

FolksonomyTaxonomy

Peer-to-PeerClient/ Server

Read/ WriteRead Only

Push/ PullPush

DynamicStatic

Web 2.0Web 2.0Web 1.0Web 1.0

groups, forums, projects, wikisCommunity building

Google.com, kartoo.com, pagebull.comsearch

Video messages, flash videos, online TV, iPodsvideo

Voice messaging boards, chat, SMSvoice/ sound

blogs, wikis, dictionaries, Text

Examples of services available

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 12

What is Web 2.0?

Web 2.0 Insightshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcIDhJsOl0A

3 Minutes

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 13

What’s Web 2.0?

Jutecht, (2006) “Web 2.0”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w

5 Minutes

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 14

What’s Web 2.0?

ariosamba, (2006) “What Are Mash-ups”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9sENSA_sjI

5 Minutes

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 15

Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators

Vaestro.com©, an example of Voice Messaging Boards

Speaking: Voice

Speaking: Voice

BoardsBoards

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 16

Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators

Tackpack.com ©, an example of Voice Messaging Boards

Speaking: Voice

Speaking: Voice

BoardsBoards

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 17

Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators

ListeningListening

BBC.co.uk ©, an example of News Live radio and TV

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 18

Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators

Elearning 4 kids ©, an example of News Live radio and TV

Online Courses and

Online Courses and CommunitiesCommunities

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 19

Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators

Blogspot.com ©, an example of a class blog

ReadingReading

WritingWriting

ResearchResearch

DiscussionsDiscussions

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 20

Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators

Page bull.com ©, an example of a live dynamic search engine

Search for new

Search for new topics or themes

topics or themes

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 21

Web 2.0 for Teachers and Educators

Stanley’s “Web 2.0 for Language Learners” Videohttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7295619536620540579

&q=Web+2.0+for+teachers

7 Minutes

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 22

References• Ariosamba, (2006). “What Are Mash-ups” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9sENSA_sjI> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Baker, T. (1999). “TIAC White Paper on: Appropriate Technology for Digital Libraries” Available from: <http://www.tiac.or.th/tiacweb/Baker/Title.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Campell, A. Rip, Mix, and Burn: creating Personal Language Learning Environments to enhance EFL classes. Available from: <http://e-poche.net/?page_id=69> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007]. •D’Souza, Q. (2006). “Web 2.0 Ideas for Educators: A Guide to Rss and More” Available from: <http://www.teachinghacks.com/audio/100ideasWeb2educators.pdf> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Flexbeta, (2006). “What is Web 2.0?” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Good, R. (2006). “Web 2.0 Remixed” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcIDhJsOl0A> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Graham (2006). “Web 2.0 & Language Learning” Available from: <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7295619536620540579&q=Web+2.0+for+teachers> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Jukes, I. (2006). “Web 2.0 Tools for Educators” Available from: <http://21cif.imsa.edu/resources/links/v1n5_Web2.0_links.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Jutecht, (2006). “Web 2.0” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsa5ZTRJQ5w> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Kitched, D. & Tobler W. (2006). “Hak.5 Microshaft Web 2.0 Framework” Available from: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmo1ef7tVso > [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• MacManus, R. (2005). “What’s Web 2.0” Available from: <http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=5> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• O’Reilly, T. (2005). “Not 2.0?”. Available from: <http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/08/not_20.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• O’Reilly, T. (2005). “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software”. Available from: <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Wikipedia’s definition of “Web 2.0”. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2> [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].• Wikiperdia’s definition of “Folksonomy”. Available from: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy > [Accessed 1 Feb. 2007].

2/11/2007 Ismail Fayed 23