Early Isotropization of the Quark Gluon Plasmaepelbaum/Santiago_29_10.pdf · Santiago de...

Early Isotropization ofthe Quark Gluon Plasma

Santiago de Compostela, 29th October 2013Thomas EPELBAUM

THOMAS EPELBAUM Early Isotropization of the Quark Gluon Plasma 0 / 28

OUTLINE

1 MOTIVATION

2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

3 A PROOF OF CONCEPT: SCALAR FIELD THEORY

4 YANG-MILLS THEORY

5 CONCLUSION

HEAVY ION COLLISIONS: THE GENERAL PICTURE

Hydrodynamics

viscousideal

Hadron gas

0 100 200 300 400

PHOBOS

η/s=10-4

η/s=0.08

η/s=0.16

η/s=0.24

[LUZUM, ROMATSCHKE (2008)]THOMAS EPELBAUM Early Isotropization of the Quark Gluon Plasma 1 / 28

Viscous Hydrodynamics

I) Macroscopic theoryII) Few parameters: PL, PT , ε, ~uIII) Need input:

1) Equation of state f(PL, PT ) = ε2) Small anisotropy3) Initialization: ε(τ0), PL(τ0)? ...4) viscous coefficients: shear viscosity η,...5) Short isotropization time

1) Equation of state f(PL, PT ) = ε2) Small anisotropy3) Initialization: ε(τ0), PL(τ0)? ...4) viscous coefficients: shear viscosity η,...5) Short isotropization timeNon

e ofthisiseasy

toget f

Early transition: the problem

Glasma Isotropization?Time scale?

Hydrodynamics

Huge anisotropy Small anisotropy(negative PL)

Long time puzzle: Does (fast) isotropization occur?

2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKHow to deal with a Heavy Ion CollisionThe Color Glass CondensateThe Classical statistical approximation

HOW TO STUDY THE TRANSITION?

Strongly coupled method: AdS/QCD?

SupersymmetricSU(N) gauge theory

Black hole

String theory

Weakly coupled method: QCD

SupersymmetricSU(N) gauge theory

Black hole

String theory

Weakly coupled QCD with only gluons

-110 1

HERAPDF1.0

exp. uncert.

model uncert.

parametrization uncert.

2 = 10 GeV2Q

H1 and ZEUS

Weakly coupled method at dense regime:αs � 1 but fgluon ∼ 1

TWO ADDITIONAL FEATURES: SATURATION AND TIME DILATION

Gluon saturation when emission = recombination⇒ Saturation scale Qs

THE COLOR GLASS CONDENSATE [MCLERRAN, VENUGOPALAN (1993)]

THE MAIN ASSUMPTIONS

• Fast gluons are "frozen" by time dilation.

• Described as static color sources J located on the light cone axis

• Small x→ Gluon saturation→ J ∼ Q3s α

−1/2s .

• Slow gluons are the standard gauge field Aµ ∼ Qs α−1/2s .

• System boost-invariant→ Aµ rapidity independant.

Langrangian of theory reads

L = −14FµνF

µν + JµAµ

Theoretical framework (Weakly coupled but strongly interacting)

x+x−

CGCJ− J+

LO: ε =12

︸︷︷︸Classicalcolor fields

DµFµν = Jν︸︷︷︸

Color sourceson the light cone

[KRASNITZ, VENUGOPALAN (1998)]

ε = E2⊥ +B2

⊥ + E2L +B2

PT = E2L +B2

PL = E2⊥ +B2

⊥ − E2L −B2

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

g2µτ

[(g2µ

[LAPPI, MCLERRAN (2006)]

ε = E2⊥︸︷︷︸0

+ B2⊥︸︷︷︸

+E2L +B2

PT = E2L +B2

PL = E2⊥︸︷︷︸0

+ B2⊥︸︷︷︸

−E2L −B2

Initial Tµν is (ε, ε, ε,−ε)!

Strong anisotropy at early time

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

g2τ P

g2µτ

τ PLτ PT

[GELIS, FUKUSHIMA (2012)]

Strong anisotropy at early time

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

g2τ P

g2µτ

τ PLτ PT

{∂τε+

ε+PLτ

= 0limτ→0+

ε = cst ⇒ PL = −ε

ε = 2PT + PL ⇒ PT = ε

[GELIS, FUKUSHIMA (2012)]

THE COLOR GLASS CONDENSATE AT NLO

E2(x) = E2(x)︸︷︷︸LO

∣∣e~k(x)∣∣2︸︷︷︸NLO

+ · · ·

e~k(x) perturbation to E(x) created by a plane waveof momentum ~k in the remote past.

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

g2 µ τ

0.0001

ηη /

1 Exp(0.427 Sqrt(g

2 µ τ))

1 Exp(0.00544 g

2 µ τ)

[ROMATSCHKE, VENUGOPALAN (2006)]

Small Fluctuations grow exponentially (Weibel instability)

• Because of instabilities, the NLO correction eventually becomes as largeas the LO⇒ Important effect, should be included

• NLO alone will grow forever⇒ unphysical effect, should be taken care of

-20 0 20 40 60 80

PLO εLO

-20 0 20 40 60 80

PNLO εNLO

• Such growing contributions are present at all orders of the perturbativeexpansion

How to deal with them?

THE CLASSICAL-STATISTICAL METHOD

• At the initial time τ = τ0, take:

~E0(τ0,~x) = ~E0(τ0,~x) +∫~k

c~k~e~k(τ0,~x)

where c~k are random coefficients:⟨c~kc~k ′

⟩∼ δ~k~k ′

• Solve the Classical equation of motion DµFµν = Jν

• Compute⟨~E

2(τ,~x)

⟩, where 〈〉 is the average on the c~k (Monte-Carlo)

• One can show that this resums all the fastest growing terms at eachorder, leading to a result that remain bounded when τ→∞[GELIS, LAPPI, VENUGOPALAN (2008)]

This gives: LO+NLO+Subset of higer orders

IMPLICATIONS OF THE CLASSICAL-STATISTICAL METHOD

LO: Classical solution

NLO:Parabolic

approximationaround LO

NLO:Parabolic

approximationaround LO

Resummed:keep thecompletepotential

0 50 100 150 200 250

g=0.5 g=1 g=2 g=4 g=8 ε/3

3 A PROOF OF CONCEPT: SCALAR FIELD THEORYThe TheoryNumerical results

SCALAR FIELD THEORY

Adapted coordinate system to describe a Heavy Ion Collision?

System boost invariant in z direction

SCALAR FIELD THEORY

Proper time/rapidity coordinate system

η = cstτ = cst

x+x−

SCALAR FIELD THEORY

The model

Initial conditions: classical statistical method

φ(τ0, x⊥,η) = ϕ0(τ0, x⊥) +∑k⊥,ν

cνk⊥eiνη aν,k⊥(τ0, x⊥)

Time evolution: Klein Gordon equation

∂τ2 +1τ

∂τ−∇2

⊥ −1τ2

∂η2

]︸︷︷︸

6φ3 = 0

HOW INTERACTIONS COMPETE WITH EXPANSION?

Initial anisotropy

Interactions isotropize the system

Expansion dilutes the system

Expansion ≶ Interactions for realistic αs?

3 A PROOF OF CONCEPT: SCALAR FIELD THEORYThe TheoryNumerical results

TµνRESUM [DUSLING, TE, GELIS, VENUGOPALAN (2012]

×10-1

×10-2 ×10-1 ×100 ×101

PT(τ0=0.01)

ε(τ0=0.01)

PT(τ0=0.1)

ε(τ0=0.1)

TµνRESUM [DUSLING, TE, GELIS, VENUGOPALAN (2012]

×10-3

×10-2

×10-1

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

2PT + P

ε BEHAVIOUR

10 100

τ-4/3

2PT + P

Bjorken Law: ∂τε+ ε+PLτ

= 0THOMAS EPELBAUM Early Isotropization of the Quark Gluon Plasma 15 / 28

HYDRODYNAMICS: IDEAL AND VISCOUS

Equation of state: ε = 2PL + PT

IDEAL HYDRO

Isotropic system

Tµνideal = εuµuν − P(gµν − uµuν)

VISCOUS HYDRO

Anisotropic system

Tµν = Tµνideal + ηπµν

In our case

PT =ε

2η3τ

PL =ε

4η3τ

HYDRODYNAMICS: IDEAL AND VISCOUS

Equation of state: ε = 2PL + PT

IDEAL HYDRO

Isotropic system

Tµνideal = εuµuν − P(gµν − uµuν)

VISCOUS HYDRO

Anisotropic system

Tµν = Tµνideal + ηπµν

In our case

PT =ε

2η3τ

PL =ε

4η3τ

FIRST ORDER VISCOUS HYDRODYNAMICS

BJORKEN’s Law (coming from ∂µTµν = 0):

∂τε+ε+ PL

τ= 0 → ∂τε+

assuming η = η0τ

and STEFAN-BOLTZMANN entropy s ≈ ε 34

∂τε+43ε

s︸︷︷︸cte

At a given time, knowing ε, PT , PL and assuming• an EOS• STEFAN-BOLTZMANN entropy• η = η0

• ηs = cte

gives a very simple hydro model.

∂τε+ε+ PL

τ= 0 → ∂τε+

assuming η = η0τ

∂τε+43ε

s︸︷︷︸cte

• ηs = cte

∂τε+ε+ PL

τ= 0 → ∂τε+

assuming η = η0τ

∂τε+43ε

s︸︷︷︸cte

• ηs = cte

COMPARISON WITH HYDRO: ISOTROPIZATION

×10-3

×10-2

×10-1

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

2PT + P

×10-3

×10-2

×10-1

50 100 150 200 250 300

τ0=70 Field theory

×10-3

×10-2

×10-1

50 100 150 200 250 300

τ0=150 Field theory

×10-3

×10-2

×10-1

50 100 150 200 250 300

τ0=200 Field theory

COMPARISON WITH HYDRO: VISCOSITY

PT − PL =2ητ

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

effective η / s

perturbation theory

AdS/CFT bound1

∼ 104

COMPARISON WITH HYDRO: VISCOSITY

see also [ASAKAWA, BASS, MULLER (2006-07)]

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

effective η / s

perturbation theory

AdS/CFT bound1

∼ 104

4 YANG-MILLS THEORYThe theoryNumerical results

THE NLO SPECTRUM

• Need to know ~e~k(τ0,~x) at the time τ0 we start the numerical simulation

• For practical reasons, we must start in the forward light cone (τ0 > 0)

x− x+

~e~k(x) ∼t 7→−∞

This can be done analytically [TE,GELIS 1307:1765]

THE NLO SPECTRUM

Result of [TE,GELIS 1307:1765]

eiν~k⊥

= iν(Fi,− − Fi,+) eη

ν~k⊥(x) = Di (Fi,− − Fi,+)

Fi,+k (x) ∼ eiνη U

†1(~x⊥)

∫~p⊥

ei~p⊥·~x⊥ U1(~p⊥ +~k⊥)(

p2⊥τ

)iν[δij −

2pi⊥pj⊥

jkλ .

• U†1 depends on the color source J+ of the first nucleus

• Analogous formula for Fi,−.

4 YANG-MILLS THEORYThe theoryNumerical results

YM ON A LATTICE

Gauge potential Aµ → link variables (exact gauge invariance on the lattice)

Numerical parameters• Transverse lattice size L = 64, transverse lattice spacing QsaT = 1• Longitudinal lattice size N = 128, longitudinal lattice spacing aL = 0.016• Number of configurations for the Monte-Carlo Nconf = 200 to 2000• Initial time Qsτ0 = 0.01

EOM ON A LATTICE

Writing

Eµ(x) =xµ

Uµ(x) = x µ U†µ(x) =x + µµ

Uµν(x) =x µ

ν U†µν(x) = x

Uµ−ν(x) =

ν U†µ−ν(x) =

We can therefore rewrite the EOM as

∂τxI=

−i2gaIa2

x I = − i g aIxI

NUMERICAL RESULTS [TE,GELIS 1307:2214]

αs = 8 10−4 (g = 0.1)

+ 10-3

+ 10-2

+ 10-1

Tµν /

τ [fm/c]

0.01 0.1 2 3 4

- 10-3

- 10-2

- 10-1

0.1 1.0

10 20 30 40

αs = 8 10−4 (g = 0.1)

0.1 1.0 10.0

τ [fm/c]

0.01 0.1

10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0

PT / ε

PL / ε

RENORMALIZATION PROCEDURE

L,div⟩

∼ Q2sk

2⊥,max + k4

⊥,max + k4⊥,max ln2 νmax

τ+ ...

︸︷︷︸Q2sk2

⊥,max

︸︷︷︸k4

⊥,max

︸︷︷︸k4

⊥,max ln2 νmaxτ

3 last diagrams can be substracted with a simulation where

Aaµ(x) = 0 + aa

E2L "fine" (B2

L too)

T,div⟩

∼ Q2s

ν2maxτ2 + k2

⊥,maxν2

maxτ2 + k4

⊥,max ln2 νmax

τ+ ...

︸︷︷︸Q2s

ν2maxτ2

︸︷︷︸k2

⊥,maxν2

maxτ2

︸︷︷︸k4

⊥,max ln2 νmaxτ

3 last diagrams can be substracted with a simulation where

Aaµ(x) = 0 + aa

How to deal with the first 2? → ad-hoc fit for the time being.

Otherwise E2L and B2

L behaves as τ−2 at early time.

ε = E2T + B2

T + E2L︸︷︷︸

+ B2L︸︷︷︸

PT = E2L︸︷︷︸

+ B2L︸︷︷︸

PL = E2T + B2

T − E2L︸︷︷︸

− B2L︸︷︷︸

〈PT〉phys. = 〈PT〉 backgd.+ fluct.

− 〈PT〉 fluct.only

〈ε, PL〉phys. = 〈ε, PL〉 backgd.+ fluct.︸︷︷︸

computed

− 〈ε, PL〉 fluct.only︸︷︷︸

computed

+ A τ−2︸︷︷︸fitted

Ad-hoc term only one to satisfy Bjorken law and EOS:

∂ττ−α + 2τ−α−1 = 0

How come that problematic divergent diagrams behaves as mass terms?

In the continuum limit, they don’t exist local gauge invariant operators ofdimension two.

On the lattice though, they coud be terms like

g2 ν2max

k2⊥,maxτ

2 TrF2,

Fµν(x) ∼x µ

αs = 2 10−2 (g = 0.5)

+ 10-3

+ 10-2

+ 10-1

Tµν /

τ [fm/c]

0.01 0.1 2 3 4

- 10-3

- 10-2

- 10-1

0.1 1.0

10 20 30 40

αs = 2 10−2 (g = 0.5)

+ 10-3

+ 10-2

+ 10-1

Tµν /

τ [fm/c]

0.01 0.1 2 3 4

- 10-3

- 10-2

- 10-1

0.1 1.0

10 20 30 40

αs = 2 10−2 (g = 0.5)

0.1 1.0 10.0

τ [fm/c]

0.01 0.1

10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0

PT / ε

PL / ε

αs = 2 10−2 (g = 0.5)

0.1 1.0 10.0

τ [fm/c]

0.01 0.1

10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0

PT / ε

PL / ε

ANOMALOUSLY SMALL VISCOSITY

Assuming simple first order viscous hydrodynamics

ε ≈ ε0τ− 4

3︸︷︷︸Ideal hydro

− 2η0τ−2︸︷︷︸

first order correction

we can compute the dimensionless ratio (η = η0τ−1)

ηε−34 . 1

In contrast, perturbation theory at LO gives ηε−34 ∼ 300.

If the system is closed from being thermal

ε−34 ∼ s =⇒ η

sNot far from

CONCLUSION

• Correct NLO spectrum from first principles

• Fixed anisotropy for g = 0.5 at τ ∼ 1fm/c

• No need for strong coupling to get isotropization

• Compatible with viscous hydrodynamical expansion

• Assuming simple first order viscous hydrodynamics

ηε−34 . 1

CONCLUSION

1) Equation of state f(PL, PT ) = ε2) Small anisotropy3) Initialization: ε(τ0), PL(τ0)? ...4) viscous coefficients: shear viscosity η,...5) Short isotropization time

Early Isotropization of the Quark Gluon Plasmaepelbaum/Santiago_29_10.pdf · Santiago de...

Documents

Ab initio - arXiv · Ab initio calculations of the isotopic dependence of nuclear clustering Serdar Elhatisari,1,2 Evgeny Epelbaum, 3,4Hermann Krebs, Timo A. Lahde,¨ 5 Dean Lee,6,7,4

Greg Epelbaum, Boiler Engineering Manager, Covanta …€¦ · – “smart” superheater location • Boiler tube surface protection: ... (Screen-FSH) ~130 ft2 ... AmStar Platen

Marc Epelbaum, Generalsekretär Bern, 26. Januar 2016 Aktualität aus dem UVG

Few-Nucleon Systems in Chiral EFT TU München, 31.05.2010 Evgeny Epelbaum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum Outline Part I: Foundations Introduction Chiral expansion

Scorpio by Thomas R. Thomas

STRONG COUPLING ISOTROPIZATION SIMPLIFIED Why linearized Einstein’s equations may be enough Wilke van der Schee Universitat de Barcelona, March 22, 2012

Thomas Paine Thomas Jefferson and Government

The University of Electro-Communications 1 -5-1 …Reference ・ Authors: K.Kinugawa, F.Shang, N.Usami, A.Hirose ・ Title of original paper: Isotropization of Quaternion-Neural-Network-Based

Chiral two- and three-nucleon forces with explicit Delta degree of … · 2017. 3. 1. · A. M. Gasparyan, Ruhr-Universität Bochum in collaboration with H. Krebs, E. Epelbaum, D

Thomas Zweifel Resume - Zweifel, Thomas

Evgeny Epelbaum, FZ Jülich & University Bonn Modern Theory ...€¦ · breakdown of perturbation theory even at very low energy! ... Halo-nuclei (Bedaque, Bertulani, Hammer, Higa,

C:Drive E18 THOMAS- IRVINE18 THOMAS - Tentative Parcel Map ...properties.cbre.us/spectrumthomasbc/assets/18-thomas-master-pla… · Title: C:Drive E18 THOMAS- IRVINE18 THOMAS - Tentative

continents&Oceans - QuiaDesigned by Jan Thomas. Designed by Jan Thomas, Designed by Jan Thomas, Designed by Jan Thomas,

Thomas Hillen Thomas Hillen

Kadin Thomas Patricio porras Kaya Thomas Lance Thomas · 2017. 4. 20. · Luis Suarez Anthony Tandy Chandler Thomas Chanie Thomas Kadin Thomas Kaya Thomas Lance Thomas ... Porras

THOMAS THOMAS · THOMAS THOMAS . Title: cata1302-puthicase Created Date: 6/28/2016 3:43:34 PM

Isospin-dependence of nuclear forces Evgeny Epelbaum, Jefferson Lab ECT*, Trento, 16 June 2005

Thomas newsletter thomas buzz-april 2011

Thomas and Thomas 2012 Brochure

Thomas & Thomas 2013 Catalog