View
216
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
13 Dec 2008
Changes from the May 2003 DoDI 5000.2
•Policy Flowing from Numerous New/Revised sections of Public Law since 2003 (some with Multiple Requirements)
•Approved Policy Appearing in over 25 Policy Memos and DoD Responses to the GAO, IG, and Congress
•Reference to 10 Updated or Newly Issued DoD Publications
•Consideration of Over 700 Defense Acquisition Policy Working Group (DAPWG) Comments
DoDI 5000.02
Approved 8 December 2008
DoDI 5000.02
2
IOC
Technology Development
Production & Deployment
Operations & Support
FRP DecisionReview
FOCMaterielSolutionAnalysisMateriel Development Decision
User Needs
Technology Opportunities & Resources
Defense Acquisition Management System - 2008
ProgramInitiation
IOCBConcept
RefinementSystem Development
& DemonstrationProduction &Deployment
Operations &Support
C
FRP DecisionReview
FOC
TechnologyDevelopment
ProgramInitiation
Design ReadinessReview
ConceptDecision
User Needs &Technology Opportunities
BA
A
Defense Acquisition Management Framework- 2003
Comparison of 2003 vs. 2008
Focus of major changes
Engineering and Manufacturing Development
Post-CDRAssessment
2
Post PDRAssessment
3 Dec 2008
C
DoDI 5000.02
3
Technology OpportunitiesSource of User Needs
Science & Technology (S&T) activities
• ATDs
• JCTDs
• Joint Warfighting Experiments
Joint Capabilities Integrated Development System (JCIDS)
• Joint Concept of Operations
• Joint integrated architectures
• DOTMLPF analysis
Which lead to:
• Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
User Needs & Technology Opportunities
Defining Desired CapabilitiesDefining Desired Capabilities
4
Operations & Support
The Defense Acquisition Management System 2008
Joint Concepts
Capabilities - Based Assessment
OSD/JCS COCOM FCB
Strategic Guidance
Incremental Development
A
User Needs
Production & Deployment O&S
Technology Opportunities & Resources
MDDICD
TechnologyDevelopment
Engineering & Manuf Development
MaterielSolutionAnalysis
JCIDS Acquisition Process
B C
“Following the Materiel Development Decision (MDD), the MDA may authorize entry into the acquisition management system at any point consistent with phase-specific entrance criteria and statutory requirements.”
CDD CPD
DoDI 5000.02
5
Two strategy approaches to full capability: evolutionary and single-step. • Particular approach chosen depends on:
– Availability of time-phased capabilities in the CDD– Technology maturity– Cost/benefit of incremental fielding vs. single step– Cost of fielding multiple configurations
> Retrofit decisions & cost
> Training
> Supportability
• Acquisition strategy shall address chosen approach• Evolutionary acquisition is the preferred strategy for rapid
acquisition of mature technology
Achieving Full Capability
6
From two processes… To one process…
Evolutionary Acquisition
• Capability delivered in increments, recognizing up front need for future capability improvements
• Each increment:
- depends on mature technology
- is a militarily useful and supportable operational capability
- Successive Technology Development Phases may be needed to mature technology for multiple increments
• Incremental Development: End-state is known; requirements met over time in several increments
• Spiral Development: End-state is not known; requirements for increments dependent upon technology maturation and user feedback.
No spirals!
7
Evolutionary Approach
AoA
EMD Increment 1
Materiel SolutionAnalysis
DAB
DAB
DAB
JROC JROC
Gap
An
alys
is
ICD CPD1
JROC
CDD2
JROC
C
EMDIncrement 2
CPD2
DAB
C
DAB
JROC
CDD3
JROC
EMDIncrement 3 CPD3
DAB
C
B
B
Joint Operating ConceptsJoint Functional Concepts
DoDStrategic Guidance
DAB
A
DAB
A
MDD
Continuous Technology Development and Maturation
TechnologyDevelopment
TechnologyDevelopment
JROC
CDD1
DAB
A TechnologyDevelopment
B
DoDI 5000.02
8
The Defense Acquisition Management System
Relationship to JCIDS
Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
Capability DevelopmentDocument (CDD)
Capability ProductionDocument (CPD)
• The Materiel Development Decision precedes entry into any phase of the acquisition management system
• Entrance Criteria met before entering phase
• Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability
IOC: Initial Operational CapabilityFOC: Full Operational Capability
PDR: Preliminary Design ReviewCDR: Critical Design ReviewFRP: Full Rate Production
IOCBA
Technology Opportunities & Resources
MaterielSolutionAnalysis
FRPDecisionReview
FOC
Materiel DevelopmentDecision
User Needs
PDR CDR
CDD CPD
ICD
AoA
Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment
Post CDRAssessment
PDR
Technology Development
Production & Deployment
Operations & Support
Engineering and Manufacturing Development
Post PDRAssessment
C
or
DoDI 5000.02
9
Materiel SolutionAnalysis
MaterielDevelopmentDecision
Materiel Solution Analysis
Purpose: Assess potential materiel solutions
• Enter: Approved ICD and study guidance for conducting AoA.
• Activities: Conduct AoA, develop Technology Development Strategy (TDS) & draft CDD
• Guided by: ICD and AoA Plan
• Exit: Materiel solution to capability need in ICD recommended by lead component conducting AoA, and phase-specific exit criteria have been satisfied
New terms/requirements in bold blue italics
A
DoDI 5000.02
Material Solution Analysis Phase
INPUTS
OUTPUTS
DoDI 5000.02
11
TechnologyDevelopment
Technology Development
APurpose: Reduce Technology Risk, Demonstrate Critical Technology on Prototypes, Complete Preliminary Design
Enter: MDA approved materiel solution and TDS; funding for TD phase activities
Activities: Competitive prototyping; develop RAM strategy; conduct Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
Guided by: ICD & TDS and supported by SE planning
Exit: Affordable increment of military-useful capability identified; technology demonstrated in relevant environment; manufacturing risks identified; PDR conducted for candidate solutions; system or increment ready for production within short time frame (normally less than 5 years for weapon systems)
New terms/requirements in bold blue italics
B
DoDI 5000.02
Technology Development Phase
OUTPUTS
INPUTS
•ICD, Draft CDD•Approved Materiel Solution•Exit Criteria•T&E Strategy•Support & MaintenanceConcepts & Technologies•SEP • TDS
•Sys Allocated Baseline • PDR Report • Live-Fire T&E Waiver request (if appropriate)•SEP • PESHE • TRA • TEMP • PPP • LCSP• Risk Assessment • Validated Product• Support & Maint. Objectives & Reqmts• NEPA Compliance Schedule (as required)Inputs to:- Info Support Plan - Acquisition Strategy- CDD -Sys Threat Assessment- Affordability Assessment- Cost & Manpower Est.- KPPs / KSAsDoDI 5000.02
13
Engineering and Manufacturing Development
Engineering & Manufacturing Development
Purpose: Develop a system or increment of capability, develop an affordable manufacturing process, minimize logistics footprint B
Integrated System Design
System Capability & Manufacturing Process Demonstration
•Enter: Mature Technology; Approved Requirements; Full Funding in FYDP
•Activities: Define system of system functionality & interfaces, complete detailed design, system-level PDR (as needed)/CDR, establish product baseline,
•Guided by: CDD, Acq Strategy, SEP & TEMP
•Exit: Complete system-level CDR and Post-CDR Assessments by MDA
•Enter: Post-CDR Assessment and establishment of initial product baseline
•Activities: Developmental Testing (DT) assesses progress against technical parameters, and Operational Assessments (OA) Against CDD
•Guided by: CDD, Acq Strategy, SEP & TEMP
•Exit: System demonstrated in intended environment using production-representative articles; manufacturing processes demonstrated; meets exit criteria and MS C entrance requirements
New terms/requirements in bold blue italics
Post CDRAssessment
Post PDRAssessment
C
DoDI 5000.02
Engineering & Manufacturing Development Phase
MS B
INPUTS
OUTPUTS
• System Performance Specification• Exit Criteria for the EMDD Phase• Validation Sys Sup & Maint. Objectives & Reqts• Acquisition Program Baseline• CDD • SEP • TEMP • Information Support Plan• Programmatic Environment, Safety, &Occupational Health Evaluation• Product Support Strategy• PPP, System Threat Assessment• Cost & Manpower Est.
• Initial Product Baseline• Test Reports• SEP • PESHE • TRA • TEMP• Risk Assessment• Product Support Element Reqmts• Inputs to:- CPD - Sys Threat Assessment- ISP - Cost & Manpower Est.
DoDI 5000.02
15
Production & Deployment
FRPDecisionReview
Production & Deployment
LRIP/IOT&E
C
•Enter: Acceptable performance in DT & OA; mature software; no significant manufacturing risks; approved CPD; refined integrated architecture; acceptable interoperability and operational supportability; demonstration of affordability; fully funded; phased for rapid deployment.
•Activities: IOT&E, LFT&E (If Required) and interoperability testing of production-representative articles; IOC possible
•Guided by: CPD, TEMP, SEP •Exit: System operationally effective, suitable and
ready for full-rate production
•Enter: Beyond LRIP & LFT&E reports (OSD T&E/LFT&E programs) submitted to congress
•Activities: Full-rate production; fielding and support of fielded systems; IOC/FOC
•Guided by: Acq strategy & life cycle sustainment plan
•Exit: Full operational capability; deployment complete
Full-Rate Production & Deployment
Purpose: Achieve an operational Capability that satisfies mission needs
New terms/requirements in bold blue italics DoDI 5000.02
Production and Deployment Phase
INPUTS OUTPUTS
DoDI 5000.02
17
Operations & Support
Operations & SupportFOC
Purpose: Execute a support program that meets materiel readiness and operational support performance requirements, and sustains the system in the most cost-effective manner over its total life cycle.
Life Cycle Sustainment Disposal
• Entrance: Approved CPD; approved LCSP; successful FRP Decision
• Activities: Performance-Based Life-Cycle Product Support (PBL) planning, development, implementation, and management; initiate system modifications as necessary; continuing reviews of sustainment strategies
• Guided by: Acquisition Strategy/LCSP
• Activities: Demilitarize and dispose of systems IAW legal and regulatory requirements, particularly environmental considerations and explosives safety
• Guided by: Programmatic Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Evaluation (PESHE)
New terms/requirements in bold blue italics DoDI 5000.02
Operations and Support PhaseINPUTS OUTPUTS
DoDI 5000.02
19
The Defense Acquisition Management System
Relationship to JCIDS
Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
Capability DevelopmentDocument (CDD)
Capability ProductionDocument (CPD)
• The Materiel Development Decision precedes entry into any phase of the acquisition management system
• Entrance Criteria met before entering phase
• Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability
IOC: Initial Operational CapabilityFOC: Full Operational Capability
PDR: Preliminary Design ReviewCDR: Critical Design ReviewFRP: Full Rate Production
IOCBA
Technology Opportunities & Resources
MaterielSolutionAnalysis
FRPDecisionReview
FOC
Materiel DevelopmentDecision
User Needs
PDR CDR
CDD CPD
ICD
AoA
Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment
Post CDRAssessment
PDR
Technology Development
Production & Deployment
Operations & Support
Engineering and Manufacturing Development
Post PDRAssessment
C
or
DoDI 5000.02
DoDI 5000.02 & Space DoDI 5000.02 & Space Acquisition PolicyAcquisition Policy
• NSS 03-01 referenced specifically in the DoDI 5000.02, dated 8 Dec 08, as follows: – Enclosure 1, References: National Security Space
Acquisition Policy 03-01, "Guidance for DoD Space System Acquisition Process"
– Table 7, Unique Decision Forums: referencing the DSAB
• Mr. Young (USD/AT&L) rescinded NSS 03-01 effective 23 Mar 08– Interim guidance is copy of NSS 03-01 with DSAB changed
to DAB and Key Decision Point changed to Milestone– 120 days to come up with Annex/Enclosure to DoDI 5000.02
Space Programs With USD/AT&L As MDA Operate Under Interim Guidance
Space Policy
“Back to Basics” and Implementing Block Approach
Space Policy
Tailored Process for Space: Life Cycle Comparison
28%
72%
Typical DoD Life Cycle Cost Curve Notional Space Life Cycle Cost Curve
Approx30%
Approx70%
System Development
& LRIP
Production, Operations & Support
Operations & Support
System Acquisition
MS“A”
MS“B”
MS“C”
MS“A”
MS“B”
MS“C”
Life Cycle Curve DSMC Acq Log Guide 1997 Notional Life Cycle Curve
Space is DifferentSpace is Different
Launch/leave for 10-15 yrs – perfect first time, every time
Takeoff
Test
Land, fix
Refly
Launch Leave
Aircraft test, land, fix and refly
Phase AConcept
Development
Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment
1st Launch
FOCIOC
Pre KDP-A Concept Studies
Upgrade Decision
KeyDecisionPoints:
Phase B Preliminary
Design
Phase CComplete
Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
B
PHASE BApproval
A
PHASE AApproval
C
PHASE CApproval Build
Approval
Follow On Buy
Approval
InitialCDD
Phase AConcept
Development
Phase AConcept
Development
Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment
1st Launch
FOCFOCIOCIOC
Pre KDP-A Concept
Studies
Pre KDP-A Concept
Studies
Upgrade DecisionUpgrade Decision
KeyDecisionPoints:
Phase B Preliminary
Design
Phase B Preliminary
Design
Phase CComplete
Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
Phase CComplete
Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
B
PHASE BApproval
BB
PHASE BApproval
A
PHASE AApproval
AA
PHASE AApproval
C
PHASE CApproval
CC
PHASE CApproval Build
ApprovalBuild Approval
Follow On Buy
Approval
Follow On Buy
Approval
Phase AConcept
Development
Phase AConcept
Development
Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment
1st Launch
FOCFOCIOCIOC
Pre KDP-A Concept
Studies
Pre KDP-A Concept
Studies
Upgrade DecisionUpgrade Decision
KeyDecisionPoints:
Phase B Preliminary
Design
Phase B Preliminary
Design
Phase CComplete
Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
Phase CComplete
Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
B
PHASE BApproval
BB
PHASE BApproval
A
PHASE AApproval
AA
PHASE AApproval
C
PHASE CApproval
CC
PHASE CApproval Build
ApprovalBuild Approval
Follow On Buy
Approval
Follow On Buy
Approval
InitialCDDInitialCDD
Phase AConcept
Development
Phase AConcept
Development
Pre-Systems AcquisitionSystems Acquisition
Sustainment
1st Launch
Pre KDP-A Concept
Studies
Pre-Phase AConcept
Studies
Upgrade DecisionUpgrade Decision
Milestones
Phase B Preliminary
Design
Phase B Preliminary
Design
Phase CComplete
Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
Phase CComplete
Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
BB
PHASE BApproval
BB
PHASE BApproval
AA
PHASE AApproval
AA
PHASE AApproval
CC
PHASE CApproval
CC
PHASE CApproval Build
ApprovalBuild Approval
Follow On Buy
Approval
Follow On Buy
Approval IOC FOCJROCCDD
JROCCDD
JROCCPD
JROCICD
SRR SDR PDR CDR
TEMPTEMP TEMP
System CO
NO
PSA
rchitectureA
oA Report
Space Acquisition Life CycleSpace Acquisition Life Cycle
Space Policy
Tailored Process for Space: Acquisition Phase Comparison
TechnologyTechnologyDevelopmentDevelopmentApprovalApproval
B C
Production and
Deployment
Operations and Support
IOCIOC FOCFOCJROCJROCICDICD
JROCJROCCDD CDD
JROCJROCCPD CPD
Full Rate Full Rate ProductionProductionApprovalApproval
--
T&E ST
RAT
T&E ST
RAT
TEMP
Concept Refinement
TechnologyDevelopment
System Development & Demonstration
DoDIDoDI 5000.2 (May 2003)5000.2 (May 2003)
Milestones:Milestones:
Concept Concept DecisionDecision
A
Decision Decision
BB CC
Production and
Deployment
Operations and Support
IOCIOCIOCIOC FOCFOCFOCFOCJROCJROCICDICD
JROCJROCCDD CDD
JROCJROCCPD CPD
Full Rate Full Rate ProductionProductionApprovalApproval
Tech D
ev St
rateg
y
TEMPTEMP
Concept Refinement
Materiel SolutionAnalysis Technology
Development
Technology DevelopmentPhase System Development &
Demonstration
Engineering &Manufacturing Development
DoDIDoDI 5000.2 (May 2003)5000.2 (May 2003)
Materiel DevelopmentDecision
NSS Acquisition Policy 03-01
Phase B Preliminary
Design
Phase AConcept
Development
SDRSRR
Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment
Follow On Buy
Approval
1st Launch
FOCIOC
Pre KDP-A Concept Studies
Upgrade Decision
Milestones
Concept Decision Meeting
JROCICD
Phase CComplete
Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
B
PHASE BApproval
A
PHASE AApproval
C
PHASE CApproval
JROCCDD
JROCCPD
PDR CDR
Build Approval
JROCCDD
InitialCDD
C--
CA--
Comparison of Space and DoD 5000 Life CycleComparison of Space and DoD 5000 Life Cycle
DoDI 5000.02 (8 December 2008)
PDR Post PDRAssessment
Post CDR Assessment
or
Space Policy
Similarities BetweenDoD 5000 & Space Policy
• Key Documentation: ICD, CDD, CPD, AS, ADM, APB, TEMP
• Requirements Process: JCIDS• Reporting: DAES, SARs, and UCRs• DoD Directive 5000.1 is guiding acquisition
policy document• Dollar thresholds for acquisition categories
established by statute– Space – Major Defense Acquisition Program– Non-space – Acquisition Categories I-III
Feb 0327
Key Reasons for Tailoring DOD Acquisition Policy for Space Systems
“Fly Offs”
Low Rate Initial
Production
Hardware mods
after launch
Key Differences Between DoD 5000 & Space Policy
• New Acquisition Model tailored for space systems:– More emphasis on earlier phases of program
development• Program Review Process:
– Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) with single Independent Program Assessment “Peer Review” vs. DAB with OIPT and multiple IIPTs & WIPTs
• Space Policy alters timing of Milestone Reviews
Pre-Systems Acquisition
Enter: Approved ICD and AoA plan
Activity: Conduct AoA based on studies of alternative solutions to the initial concept; Develop Acquisition Strategy
Exit: MDA selects preferred solution to be pursued
Concept Studies
Pre-Systems Acquisition
Pre KDP-A Concept StudiesPre KDP-A Concept Studies
System C
ON
OPS
Architecture
AoA
Report
KeyDecisionPoints:
Concept Decision Meeting
JROCICD
T&
E Strategy
AA
PHASE A Approval
Phase AConcept
Development
Space Policy
Pre-Phase AConcept Studies
• Activities in this phase conducted by Joint Chiefs of Staff and User Major Command (MAJCOM)– There is no System Program Office (SPO) yet– Concept planning to define a new operational capability– Requirements developed through the Joint Capabilities
Integration & Development System (JCIDS) process
• Key Documentation:– Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)– System level Concept of Operations (CONOPS)– Architecture– Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Report– Test & Evaluation (T&E) Strategy
Space Policy
Phase AConcept Development
SDRSRR
Pre-Systems AcquisitionKeyDecisionPoints:
TE
MP
JROCCDD
Phase-A Concept DevelopmentPhase-A Concept Development
AA
PHASE A Approval
PHASE B Approval
B
Pre-Phase A
Complete Studies
Phase BPreliminary Design
Enter: PM has possible technical solution but has not matured technology; approved ICD
Activities: Mature TechnologyReduction of integration riskSystem Spec and Functional Baseline
Exit: Independent Program Assessment validates strategy
Space Policy
Phase A Concept Development
• Develop a mature concept and architecture for system baseline. Activities include:– Concept & system architecture development– Technology development and maturity assessment– Trade studies– Vulnerability assessment– Risk reduction– Requirements and functional baseline development– Industrial capability assessments for key technologies
• Key Documentation:– Capability Development Document (CDD)– Test and Evaluation Management Plan (TEMP)
Space Policy
Phase AConcept Development, Con’t
• Key Reviews:– System Readiness Review (SRR)
• Ensures system requirements are identified and complete
– System Design Review (SDR)• Defines system performance, functional
characteristics, and component interfaces
– IPA and MS-B Approval
Goal: Solid program baseline for Phase BGoal: Solid program baseline for Phase B
Space Policy
Phase BPreliminary System Design
PDR
Systems Acquisition
KeyDecisionPoints:
Phase-B Preliminary Design
C
PHASE C Approval
PHASE B Approval
B
TE
MP
Phase CComplete Design
Phase AConcept
Development
Enter: PM has specific technical solution ready for design and integration
Activities: Mature Technology to TRL 6Reduction of integration riskPDR
Exit: Independent Program Assessment validates Design Readiness
Space Policy
Phase B Preliminary Design
• Formal program initiation• Conduct risk reduction• Complete technology development
– Technology should be demonstrated in the relevant environments
• Increase confidence in alternative(s)– Assess estimated risk levels– Assess projected performance
• Key Documentation:– TEMP
Space Policy
Phase B Preliminary Design
• Key Reviews:– Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
• Evaluates selected design approach and risk resolution
– IPA and MS-C Approval
Goal: Complete design - Phase CGoal: Complete design - Phase C
Space Policy
Phase CComplete Design
Systems Acquisition
Phase CComplete Design
JROCCPD
CDR
Build Approval
C
PHASE C Approval
Phase BPreliminary Design
Phase DBuild & Operations
Enter: PM has specific design solution ready for detailed development and CDD
Activities: Mature TechnologyReduction of integration riskCDR
Exit: Independent Program Assessment validates Design
Space Policy
Phase CComplete Design
• Complete design activities. Extra design emphasis allows us to:– Increase confidence in alternatives
identified in Phase B– Mitigate risks
• Key Documents– Capability Production Document (CPD)
• Required to proceed to Build Approval
Space Policy
Phase CComplete Design
• Key Reviews– Critical Design Review (CDR)
• Evaluates detailed design
– Build Approval• Authorizes fabrication, testing, deploying and
supporting operations for new system• Marks end of design development
GoalGoal: Ready to Build & Deploy: Ready to Build & Deploy
Space Policy
Phase DBuild and Operations
Systems Acquisition Sustainment
Follow On Buy
Approval
1st Launch
IOC
Upgrade Decision
Phase DBuild & Operations
Phase CComplete Design
Build Approval
FOC
Enter: PM has detailed design ready for construction and CPD
Activities: Spacecraft Construction1st LaunchIOCIOT&E
Space Policy
Phase D Build and Operations
• Contractor builds system to design– Fabrication, integration, testing, and deployment
• Conduct studies to:– Assess reliability, maintainability, and availability– Resolve hardware or software problems– Maintain performance over the system’s planned life
• Conduct testing of system– Developmental Test and Evaluation– Operational Test and Evaluation
• Launch or deploy system• Sustainment
– Provide operations support– Dispose at the end of useful life
Space Policy
• Key reviews:– Follow On Buy Approval
• Authorizes additional procurements of system– Upgrade Decision
• Authorizes improvements to system
• Key events:– 1st Launch– Initial Operational Capability declaration– Full Operational Capability declaration
Phase DBuild and Operations
GoalGoal: Operational/Sustainable/Affordable System: Operational/Sustainable/Affordable System
Space Policy
• Work with the range you’ll be using– Vehicle, Schedule, Design, Cost,
Safety, Support
Launch
Space Policy
Operational Capability
• Initial Operational Capability (IOC)– An event defined by the User’s
MAJCOM– Represents fielding of the first
operationally effective production unit(s)
• Fully Operational Capability (FOC)– All production units fielded – Systems are supportable and capable
of performing their mission
Space Policy
Recommended