22
Concrete Coalition Concrete Coalition Toolkit

Concrete Coalition

  • Upload
    eeri

  • View
    100

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Concrete Coalition

Concrete CoalitionConcrete Coalition Toolkit

Page 2: Concrete Coalition

Concrete Coalition

Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI)

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER)

Applied Technology Council (ATC)

Page 3: Concrete Coalition

Hildebrand Hall

Page 4: Concrete Coalition

Olive View Hospital

Page 5: Concrete Coalition

Kaiser Permanente

Page 6: Concrete Coalition

St. John’s Hospital

Page 7: Concrete Coalition

Barrington Office Building

Van Nuys Holiday Inn

Page 8: Concrete Coalition

Kobe - January 16,1995

Page 9: Concrete Coalition

Consequences of earthquakes for the US

Event Deaths Economic Loss

Previous 1989 Loma Prieta 62 $10 billion

1994 Northridge 57 $20 billion

1995 Kobe Japan >5,500 $250 billion

Page 10: Concrete Coalition

$200 billion2,000 – 6,000

Scenario Newport-Inglewood Fault (M7)

$200 billion3,000 – 8,000

Repeat of 1906 San Francisco

$33 billion>1,600Seattle Fault Scenario (M6.7)

$100 billion>4,000Hayward Fault Scenario (M7)Projected

$250 billion>5,5001995 Kobe Japan

$20 billion571994 Northridge

$10 billion621989 Loma PrietaPrevious

Economic LossDeathsEvent

Consequences of earthquakes for the US

Page 11: Concrete Coalition

11

Algeria

Armenia

Page 12: Concrete Coalition

Colombia

India

Page 13: Concrete Coalition

TurkeyPhilippines

Page 14: Concrete Coalition

Mexico

Japan

Page 15: Concrete Coalition

U.S.A.

Page 16: Concrete Coalition

Chances of Dying if a Major Earthquake Occurs

San Francisco 1 in 1000Istanbul 1 in 50

Page 17: Concrete Coalition

How many killers are there?

“50% of the casualties are coming from 5% of the buildings.” Kircher et al., 2006

OperationalHeavyCollapse

Mexico City, 1985

Erzincan, 19920

20

40

60

80

100

Percentage

Kobe, 1995

Luzon, 1990

Otani (1999)

Page 18: Concrete Coalition

The “Challenge”

Some concrete buildings constructed before the 1970’s might be dangerous.

Where are they ? Which ones are dangerous ?

Page 19: Concrete Coalition

The “Next” Challenge

Retrofit is expensiveHow can we do better to reduce costs ?

Page 20: Concrete Coalition

The Challenge of “Reality”

These buildings do not exist in a seismic vacuum.

What are the economic and social implications?

How can we develop community retrofit programs the represent the interests of all stakeholders?

Page 21: Concrete Coalition

Initial California OES Effort Local representatives gather existing information/data.

◦ Inventories◦ Design and construction history◦ Ordinances and programs◦ Case histories

Assemble into accessible database◦ Research◦ Program development◦ Public policy credibility

Page 22: Concrete Coalition

Concrete Coalition

“We need you!”

www.concretecoalition.org