23
COMPRESSED AIR VEHICLE: VIEW & WHY NOT SO IN USE Submitted to: Mr. Ravinder Upadhaya (HOD) Dept. of Mechanical Engg. Submitted By: Apoorva Rawat Mechanical 4 th year ME006 SEMINAR-

compressed air vehicle

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: compressed air vehicle

COMPRESSED AIR VEHICLE: VIEW & WHY NOT SO IN USE

Submitted to:Mr. Ravinder Upadhaya (HOD)Dept. of Mechanical Engg.

Submitted By:Apoorva Rawat Mechanical 4th yearME006

SEMINAR-

Page 2: compressed air vehicle

Introduction

major problem - air pollution

To reduce the problem -alternative fuel is compressed air

The air powered car - low pollution or zero pollution cars

safe to use and environment friendly

Page 3: compressed air vehicle

Non Renewable Expensive Polluted

Problem With GASOLINE

Page 4: compressed air vehicle

Alternative energies

Air EnergySolar Energy Electric Energy

Page 5: compressed air vehicle

compressed-air vehicle:A compressed-air vehicle - powered by

an air engine, using compressed air, which is stored in a tank.

Compressed air vehicles (CAV) use the expansion of compressed air to drive their pistons.

One manufacturer claims to have designed an engine that is 90 percent efficient.

Page 6: compressed air vehicle

6

Guy Negre presenting the air car- AIRPOD

Page 7: compressed air vehicle

Summary – Energy Efficiency

Diesel

Gasoline

Battery Electric

Compressed Air

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40

0.40

0.15

0.19

0.05

Efficiency (Fossil Fuel to Motor Out)

Conclusion: Compressed air vehicles are on the low end of efficiency, diesel is unmatched for converting fossil fuel to usable motor power

Page 8: compressed air vehicle

Summary – Carbon Emissions

Diesel

Gasoline

Battery Electric

Compressed Air

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

1.7

1.7

3.2

12.5

Carbon Footprint (kg / KWh)

Conclusion: Compressed air vehicles produce lots of CO2 when powered by fossil fueled power plants

Page 9: compressed air vehicle

Summary – Energy Volumetric Density

Diesel

Gasoline

Battery Electric

Compressed Air

0 10,00020,00030,00040,000

36,400

32,230

1,080

47

Energy Density (MJ/meter cubed)

Conclusion: Compressed air energy storage systems are not able to store a great deal of energy, limiting their range.

Page 10: compressed air vehicle

Summary – Technology Cost Analysis

Diesel

Gasoline

Battery Electric

Compressed Air

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200

$39

$28

$62

$167

Technology Cost (Dollars/kW)

Conclusion: Compressed air vehicles are on the high end in terms of cost to produce power due to low power output.

Page 11: compressed air vehicle

Technical benefits:The temperature of the engine -lessSmooth working- less wear and tear of the

components.no possibility of knocking.No need of cooling systems and spark plugs

or Complex fuel injection systemAir, on its own, is non-flammable, abundant

economical, transportable, storable and, most importantly, nonpolluting.

Page 12: compressed air vehicle

reduces the cost of vehicle The mechanical design of the engine is

simple and robust. Low manufacture and maintenance costs as

well as easy maintenance. Lighter vehicles would mean less abuse on

roads, thus, resulting in longer lasting roads. The price of fueling air powered vehicles will

be significantly cheaper

Page 13: compressed air vehicle

WHY NOT IN USE ?

Page 14: compressed air vehicle

Disadvantage Less power outputProbability of air leakage.Less air station are available. Biggest disadvantage is the energy needed

to compress the air is greater than the energy stored

Page 15: compressed air vehicle

Cont…

Refueling the compressed air container take as long as 4 hours

Tanks get very hot when filled rapidly. complex propulsion system.Passenger compartment heating is more

difficult since the propulsion system does not provide a source of waste heat.

Page 16: compressed air vehicle

Power Transmission:

Air Compressor Solenoid

PistonsCrank Shaft Wheels

Page 17: compressed air vehicle

Cont…

Page 18: compressed air vehicle

18

What’s CAPE..?A power producing device consuming

compressed air.

Compressed air is expanded inside an engine cylinder to produce torque.

It produces no pollution.

It consumes no fuel; only the compressed air.

Page 19: compressed air vehicle

Building Compressed Air Engine From Conventional Engine.

To delete the power stroke.

Valve timing. Alterations in

Camshafts.Change in intake valve.

Page 20: compressed air vehicle

20

Benefits of CAPE

Air Engine

Uses Only Air

No Need of Fossil

Fuels

Needs Less Maintenan

ce

Low in Cost

High Power to Weight

Ratio

Zero Pollution

Page 21: compressed air vehicle

21

Future Scope

Future of CAPE

Multi-cylinder Engines

Recirculation of Air

Higher Torque

and Power

Improved method of Controlling

Valve Timing

Page 22: compressed air vehicle

Conclusion:vehicles running on only compressed air

might seem like a distant dream they still have public interest due to

their environmental friendly nature. Efforts should be to make them light,

safe, cost effective and economical for deriving.

Electric-powered cars and bikes -strong competition

not deterred inventors from working on it.

Page 23: compressed air vehicle