Upload
fiatifta
View
135
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The FIAT/IFTA MAM SurveyHighlights from the results analysis
FIAT/IFTA MMC Seminar, Glasgow 2015 – Brecht Declercq (VIAA), Gerhard Stanz (ORF) – 21.05.2015
8.5%2.1%
12.8%
4.3%
12.8%
12,8%
23.4%
21.3%
2.1%
Q1 to Q4. What stage are you in?
We have no file based collection
We have a file based collection, but no MAM plans
Preparing development or acquisition of a first MAM or file based workflow
Implementing a first MAM or file based workflow
We have a working first version
We're preparing the development or the acquisition of a second version
We're implementing a second version
We have a working second version
Other
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
86a. When did your FIRST MAM or file based workflow come into production phase?
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2012 2014 2015 20160
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Number of first and second MAM implementations per year
Nr of 1st MAM implementations Nr of 2nd MAM implementations
n = 62
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20167.0
6.05.6
10.010.6
6.09.1
9.09.2
10.010.57.8
5.99.27.07.84.55.8
4,35.0
6.65.95.66.1
2.12.01.2
Number of years that a first MAM was in use n = 27
The impact of MAM on ...
Access to born digital and digitized content: very positive
Tracking of use and re-use: generally positive
Detail and accuracy of cataloging: generally positive
Quantity of content archived: significant increase
Free-text questions:
Most quoted as positive effects ...
Access to the content
Performance of the system
Workflows management
Free-text questions:
Most quoted as challenges ...
System design
Workflows management
System interfaces
Free-text questions:
Most quoted as challenges ...
23.5%
55.9%
17.6%
2.9%One other remarkable result: financing
1 - Rather big challenge
2 - Somewhat a challenge
3 - Rather small challenge
4 - No challenge at all
Free-text questions:
Most quoted as expectancies ...
Better system maintenance
Metadata, rights metadata in particular
Storage issues
Radio programmes / spoken word audio
Music
Television programmes / moving images
Stills / pictures
Pictures of your own archival objects
Other: QC reports, subtitles, scripts, special effects
0% 10%20%
30%40%
50%60%
70%80%
90%100%
13a. What kind of content is / will be kept in your MAM or digital repository?
YESNO
n = 42
As rushes / elementals
As full programmes before broadcasting / publication
As full programmes after broadcasting / publication
13b. From which stage of the production process will TV or radio programmes enter the MAM or digital repository?
YESNO
n = 42
newssports
current affairs / factualdocumentary
fiction / dramapublicity
shows / quizentertainment
cartoons / animationchildren's programmes
feature filmsother: institutional meeting recordings
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
13c. Which genres are kept in your MAM or digital repository?
YESNO
n = 42
Essence (e.g. audio, video, still images)
Metadata referring to digital files in the same system
Metadata referring to not (yet) file based, analog objects
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
13d. What is / will be kept in your MAM or digital repository?
YES
NO
n = 42
69.0%
21.4%
9.5%
14. Is your MAM or digital repository connected to a digital radio or TV production en-vironment?
Yes, it is currentlyNo, not yet, but there's a plan to connect itNo, and there are no plans to connect it
n = 42
59.5%26.2%
14.3%
Q15. Does your MAM or digital repository handle rights information?
Yes
No, not yet, but there's a plan to include rights information
No, and there are no plans to include rights information
n = 42