Upload
john-blue
View
427
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Mycoplasma Infection Costs In A Naïve Swine Population - Dr. Tom Gillespie, Rensselaer Swine Services, from the 2013 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, September 14-17, 2013, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2013-leman-swine-conference-material
Citation preview
Mycoplasma Infection Costs: When a naïve
population become infected
Thomas Gillespie, DVM, Diplomate ABVPMegan S. Nemechek, DVMRensselaer Swine Serviceswww.rssvet.comMember of the Swine Health Alliancewww.swinehealthalliance.com
04/08/2023
04/08/2023
Disclaimer!
There are many in this room that grew up with computers, but for those of us born using “stone tablets” – Excel can be challenging!
04/08/2023
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaeM hyo. acronyms
– MPS: Mycoplasma Pneumonia of swine– EP: Enzootic Pneumonia– PRDC: Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex
• Several pathogens in combination can yield PRDC including PRRS, SIV, APP, Salmonella cholerasuis…
• Lesions tend to be most severe when Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is present.
Old Disease– 1948: MPS first recognized as a specific disease.– 1965: First reproduced experimentally in US and England.
04/08/2023
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae
The bug
– Small– Slow growing (weeks
to months to culture)– Difficult to isolate – Easily killed by many
disinfectants– Predilection for
epithelial cilia in the lower airways
History and overview: Pathogenesis
Enzootic Pneumonia - The disease– By itself
• Dry, non-productive cough• Reduced ADG• Reduced Feed Conversion• High morbidity and low mortality
04/08/2023
How?• Attachment to epithelial cilia in the lower airways yields
“a broken escalator”– Bronchitis or Bronchiolitis– Inflammation -> airway obstruction– Pneumonia
04/08/2023
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae
Gross Lesions• Catarrhal
bronchopneumonia in the cranioventral and accessory lobes and the cranial portion of the caudal lung lobes
04/08/2023
» Mycoplasma is maintained in the herd by sow to piglet transmission.
» Slow spread of the organism within litters » Once infection is established in few pigs, transmission among
pen mates occurs, especially after animals are pooled together at weaning time.
» Increased animal density downstream in the nursery» Spread of other infectious agents (SIV or PRRS) and
environmental factors (dust or gas) also occur following weaning. All can make the infection more severe.
» Typically peak of M. hyo is observed in the finishing period
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Disease Dynamics
Veterinarians = manage health
04/08/2023
Clinical symptoms
Serology
Lesions Performance
04/08/2023
Herd dynamics and demographics
1. 2200 sows multiple sites
2. Main finisher site is a continues flow site with only 2 to 4 weeks of “downtime”
• Today with additional off-sites – nearly 7 weeks of time when no pigs are placed
3. March, 2010 a cough developed and was diagnosed as M hyo without PRRS virus or Influenza virus A
Each unit has constraints
• Flow in the finisher • Lighter market weights when the health
challenge occurred• Feed conversion varies due to feed
ingredients and health• Co-infections makes it hard to develop
costs although in this case only one pathogen was involved
04/08/2023
04/08/2023
Working with close out information
Mortality ADG FC substandardPre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre post
PPFW13660 - 08/03/2009 6.85% 1.97 2.33 2.63%BBFN13699 - 08/30/2009 4.17% 1.95 2.61 3.96%PPFE13721 - 09/10/2009 3.10% 1.94 2.39 2.23%RMF13749 - 09/10/2009 2.41% 2.06 2.62 0.88%MWF13749 - 09/22/2009 1.40% 2.01 2.42 2.48%PPFW13780 - 11/10/2009 9.18% 1.97 2.44 1.39%BBNF13823 - 11/16/2009 2.95% 2.10 2.73 1.55%MWF13871 - 01/05/2010 2.37% 2.07 2.68 0.81%PPFE13829 - 01/05/2010 5.56% 1.95 2.58 2.09%RMF13868 - 01/05/2010 1.75% 2.05 2.93 0.25%RMF13868 - 02/23/2010 4.76% 1.91 2.69 2.47%MWF13975 - 04/27/2010 2.67% 1.94 2.78 2.37%PPFE13927 - 05/03/2010 7.65% 1.79 2.81 3.51%PPWF13993 - 06/24/2010 8.27% 1.80 2.80 5.10%RMF14070 - 07/28/2010 4.41% 1.86 2.96 1.54%MWF14087 - 08/17/2010 2.44% 1.84 2.79 0.96%PPEF14040 - 08/17/2010 10.40% 1.77 2.62 3.16%
Average 4.04% 5.97% 2.00 1.83 2.58 2.79 1.89% 2.77%
04/08/2023
PPFW13
660
- 08/
03/2
009
BBFN1369
9 - 0
8/30
/200
9
PPFE1372
1 - 0
9/10
/200
9
RMF13
749
- 09/
10/2
009
MW
F1374
9 - 0
9/22
/200
9
PPFW13
780
- 11/
10/2
009
BBNF1382
3 - 1
1/16
/200
9
MW
F1387
1 - 0
1/05
/201
0
PPFE1382
9 - 0
1/05
/201
0
RMF13
868
- 01/
05/2
010
RMF13
868
- 02/
23/2
010
MW
F1397
5 - 0
4/27
/201
0
PPFE1392
7 - 0
5/03
/201
0
PPWF13
993
- 06/
24/2
010
RMF14
070
- 07/
28/2
010
MW
F1408
7 - 0
8/17
/201
0
PPEF1404
0 - 0
8/17
/201
00.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
Pre and Post infectionCovariance of Market Weights
CoVar
Avg CoVar
Group - Closeout Date
Co
Var
Mycoplasma swabs - 3/9/10
04/08/2023
PPFW13
660
- 08/
03/2
009
BBFN1369
9 - 0
8/30
/200
9
PPFE1372
1 - 0
9/10
/200
9
RMF13
749
- 09/
10/2
009
MW
F1374
9 - 0
9/22
/200
9
PPFW13
780
- 11/
10/2
009
BBNF1382
3 - 1
1/16
/200
9
MW
F1387
1 - 0
1/05
/201
0
PPFE1382
9 - 0
1/05
/201
0
RMF13
868
- 01/
05/2
010
RMF13
868
- 02/
23/2
010
MW
F1397
5 - 0
4/27
/201
0
PPFE1392
7 - 0
5/03
/201
0
PPWF13
993
- 06/
24/2
010
RMF14
070
- 07/
28/2
010
MW
F1408
7 - 0
8/17
/201
0
PPEF1404
0 - 0
8/17
/201
01.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
Pre and Post InfectionADG
ADG
Avg ADG
Group - Closeout Date
AD
G
04/08/2023
PPFW13
660
- 08/
03/2
009
BBFN1369
9 - 0
8/30
/200
9
PPFE1372
1 - 0
9/10
/200
9
RMF13
749
- 09/
10/2
009
MW
F1374
9 - 0
9/22
/200
9
PPFW13
780
- 11/
10/2
009
BBNF1382
3 - 1
1/16
/200
9
MW
F1387
1 - 0
1/05
/201
0
PPFE1382
9 - 0
1/05
/201
0
RMF13
868
- 01/
05/2
010
RMF13
868
- 02/
23/2
010
MW
F1397
5 - 0
4/27
/201
0
PPFE1392
7 - 0
5/03
/201
0
PPWF13
993
- 06/
24/2
010
RMF14
070
- 07/
28/2
010
MW
F1408
7 - 0
8/17
/201
0
PPEF1404
0 - 0
8/17
/201
02.00
2.20
2.40
2.60
2.80
3.00
3.20
Pre and Post InfectionFC
FC
Avg FC
Group - Closeout Date
FC
04/08/2023
PPFW13
660
- 08/
03/2
009
BBFN1369
9 - 0
8/30
/200
9
PPFE1372
1 - 0
9/10
/200
9
RMF13
749
- 09/
10/2
009
MW
F1374
9 - 0
9/22
/200
9
PPFW13
780
- 11/
10/2
009
BBNF1382
3 - 1
1/16
/200
9
MW
F1387
1 - 0
1/05
/201
0
PPFE1382
9 - 0
1/05
/201
0
RMF13
868
- 01/
05/2
010
RMF13
868
- 02/
23/2
010
MW
F1397
5 - 0
4/27
/201
0
PPFE1392
7 - 0
5/03
/201
0
PPWF13
993
- 06/
24/2
010
RMF14
070
- 07/
28/2
010
MW
F1408
7 - 0
8/17
/201
0
PPEF1404
0 - 0
8/17
/201
00.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
Pre and Post InfectionMortality
Mortality %
Avg Mortality
Group - Closeout Date
Mo
rtal
ity
Statistical analysis
04/08/2023
Number of
batches
ADG FCR ADFI
(mean±SD) (mean±SD) (mean±SD)
(lb.)
Mycoplasma naïve period
16 1.99± 0.095 2.58±0.190 5.11±0.43
Mycoplasma infection/post
infection period
9 1.86±0.680 2.71±0.150 5.05±0.40
Difference between the two time
periods (t-test) P=0.0021 P=0.07 P=0.74
04/08/2023
Assumptions
Feed Price $232.00 /T or $0.116/ lb.with no antibiotic or
fat added
Market Hog Revenue $130.00 /pig
Maintenance cost of DOF 5.50 lb./day
Overhead Cost of DOF $0.10 /day
Initial Weight of Pigs 50.0 lbs.
Market Weight of Pigs 255.0 lbs.
(This market weight is light)
04/08/2023
Economic calculations
1. Feed Cost
Naïve Myco+ Difference
Gain, lb. 205.0 205.0
FCR 2.58 2.71 0.13
Lbs. Feed/Pig 528.9 555.6 26.65
Feed Cost $122.70 $128.89 Difference = $6.18
04/08/2023
Economic calculations
2. Maintenance cost of DOF
Naïve Myco+ Difference
Gain, lbs. 205.0 205.0
ADG, g/d 1.99 1.86 -0.13
Days to Market 103.0 110.2 7.20
Maintenance Feed Cost $0.00 $9.19Difference =
$9.19
04/08/2023
Economic calculations
3. Overhead Cost of DOF
Naïve Myco+ Difference
Days to Market 103.0 110.2 7.20
Overhead Cost/pig $10.30 $11.02Difference =
$0.72
04/08/2023
Sum of the three cost centers
Total Costs associated with this Mycoplasma infection
1. Feed Cost $6.18
2. Maintenance cost of DOF $9.19
3. Overhead Cost of DOF $0.72
Total $16.09 /pig
04/08/2023
Another look at cost difference
Income over feed cost
Naïve Myco+ Difference
Income/pig $130.00 $130.00
Feed Cost $122.70 $128.89 $6.18
Maintenance Feed Cost $0.00 $9.19 $9.19
Overhead Cost $10.30 $11.02 $0.72
Revenue -$3.01 -$19.10 $16.09
04/08/2023
Other potential significant costs
• Please note that this does not include:– Injectable and water expenses– Additional feed expenses– Sort loss and cull animal – Mortality costs– Extra labor– Etc.
04/08/2023
Summary comments
• The outbreak occurred in March, 2010– Economic costs were figured in late 2010
after client asked for a look at costs associated with the outbreak but to leave out the mortality.
• The example today is using current feed and other costs in today’s environment
04/08/2023
Summary comments
• Sick pigs don’t eat!• Costs will vary depending on pathogens
associated with the outbreak and variables included
• Recent high feed costs has most everyone focused on Feed Conversion– What about longer time to market?
• Can use this method to help an owner look at a disease elimination program
04/08/2023
New image of
Horsehead Nebula in infrared
Astronomers have used NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope to photograph the iconic Horsehead Nebula in a new, infrared light to mark the 23rd anniversary of the famous observatory’s launch aboard the space shuttle Discovery on April 24, 1990.
www.earthsky.org/science-wire/new-image-of-horsehead-nebula-in-infrared
Thank you!!