11
Transcortical Transventricular Endoscopic Approach and Ommaya Reservoir Placement for Cystic Craniopharyngioma Dhaval Shukla Department of Neurosurgery, NIMHANS, Bangalore, India.

Craniopharyngioma endoscopy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Transcortical Transventricular Endoscopic Approach and

Ommaya Reservoir Placement for Cystic Craniopharyngioma

Dhaval ShuklaDepartment of Neurosurgery, NIMHANS, Bangalore, India.

Cystic Craniopharyngiomas

• Cyst accounts for major tumor bulk • Complete resection of cystic craniopharyngiomas is

desirable • Hindered by functional preservation

• Regrow after partial resection or cyst puncture• Ommaya reservoir for repeated aspiration

• Reservoir is generally placed after partial surgical resection, or stereotactically

• Malposition of reservoir is not uncommon• A simple technique of endoscopic approach and

reservoir placement for cystic craniopharyngiomasMori RJ, et al. J Neurol Surg A. 2014.

Pettorini BL, et al. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009.

External view of cyst Inner view of cyst

Placement of Catheter Reservoir

Case 1

Case 2

Data

• Five Cases – 3 children• Presented with raised ICP, no endocrinopathy• Purely or predominantly cystic tumors• Post op RT• F/u – 12 -17 months • No recurrence• No reaspiration• No dislodgement of catheter• No adverse effect related to procedure

Treatment Paradigm

• Traditional algorithms (gross total resection vs. subtotal resection +/- radiation therapy) are often not employed• Alternative algorithms including intracystic therapies,

progression-contingent RT, and SRS

• Survey of members of AANS • 36% recommended observation or RT for in absence of

diagnosis

• This change in treatment paradigm calls for minimally invasive technique for treatment • Innovative treatment strategies are warranted to

improve QoL

Hankinson TC, et al. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2013.Muller HL. Horm Res. 2008.

Why Reservoir?

• Our previous series • 52.5% partial excision• Complication rate 19.1%• GTR - 29.2% • PR - 10.4% • Pediatric 35.7% • Adult 4.3%

• PR preferred but recurrence is high• Repeated aspiration • Injection of chemotherapeutic agents

Patel A. NIMHANS 2005.

Why Endoscopy?

• Improper placement of the catheter with other techniques• 7% to 16%

• Endoscopy results in accurate catheter placement• Biopsy under direct vision can be done• Hydrocephalus can be take care of• Not associated with any morbidity

• Early RT after surgery can be given

• Another procedure may not be required• 73% did not require reaspiration

Mori RJ, et al. J Neurol Surg A. 2014.Moussa AH, et al. Br J Neurosurg. 2013

Limitations

• Large defect in cyst wall can predispose to leakage if intracystic therapies are employed• 16.3% children had misplacement or leakage of the

catheter (not endoscopic)

• Can be difficult in case of multiloculated cystic • Possible to fenestrate multiple loculation, and convert

all of them into a single cyst

• Excision cannot be done• Not a goal of this procedure

Zanon N, et al. Surg Neurol. 2008.Pettorini BL, J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009.

Conclusion

Transcortical transventricular endoscopic approach and

Ommaya reservoir placement for cystic craniopharyngioma

is a minimally invasive, safe, accurate, and effective method.

Shukla D. Transcortical Transventricular Endoscopic Approach and Ommaya

Reservoir Placement for Cystic Craniopharyngioma.

Pediatric Neurosurgery 2015. DOI: 10.1159/000433605