Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Texas STaR Chart Helps teachers and campuses measure technology growth and set goals. This presentation presents an overview of the STaR Chart, including data from an example campus.
Citation preview
Texas STaR Chart propelling
teachers, schools, campuses, and districts
toward 21st century technology goals and beyond
What does the STaR Chart measure, and how does our campus measure up?
agenda
origin and goals
uses for campus/district improvement
levels of progress
recent STaR Chart results for Smith
Middle School
recommendations
origin & goals
School Technology and Readiness Chart
developed by ECTA http://starchart.esc12.net/
Long-Range Plan for Tech, 2006/20020 http://www.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec
06.pdf
SBEC Tech App. Standards for teachers
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
TA TEKS, Chapter 126 http://www.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/ch126toc.html
Return to last slide viewed
campus/district improvement
create/update tech plan or
conceptualize vision
set benchmarks and goals
measure student & teacher tech
proficiencies
apply for grants
determine funding priorities
track progress on No Child Left
Behind
Campus StaR Chart
Return to last slide viewed
Previous
STaR Chart results for Smith
2008/2009
2007/2008 unavailable
2006/2007
2005/2006
Return to last slide viewed
Previous
Smith’s key area comparison
Infrastructure for Technology
Leadership, Administration, & Instructional Support
Educator Preparation & Development
Teaching & Learning
0 3 6 9 12151821
11
12
15
13
18
13
16
14
8
11
10
11
2008/20092006/20072005/2006
Early Tech: 6-8 Advanced Tech: 15-20Developing Tech: 9-14 Target Tech: 21-34Previou
s
levels of progress
Early Tech
Developing
Tech
Advanced Tech
Target Tech
2007/2008Campus Statewide Summary
by Key Area
Return to last slide viewed
Previous
trends in key tech areas
Teaching & Learning
scores relatively constant 2 or 3 for most sub-areas slight decline in 08/09 (TL6)
Educator Preparation & Development
scores relatively constant 05/06 to 6/07 scores drop significantly in 08/09 EP5 drop from 3 (06/07) to 1 (08/09)
Leadership, Administration, &
Instructional Support
scores relatively constant 05/06-06/07 2 or 3 for most sub-areas slight decline in 08/09 (L5)
Infrastructure for Technology
scores increase 05/06-06-07 drastic drop in 08/09 INF2, 4, 5, & 6 drop by 2 or more points
Return to Smith’s STaR Charts
Return to last slide viewed
recommendations I
to enhance Educator Prep. &
Dev.
campus-based training for SBEC TA
standards
tech mentors for tech novices
collaborative lesson planning with
technology
Return to Campus STaR Chart; see summary p. 9
Return to last slide viewed
recommendations II
to enhance Infrastructure for Technology
increase Internet connectivity in all classrooms
increase tech support staff per computer ratio
increase LAN/WAN access to campus resources
increase access to rich media online learning
Return to Campus STaR Chart; see summary p. 9
Return to last slide viewed
summary STaR Chart drives
education for the future2
identifies needs & shapes vision
teachers & students learning together06/200
http://staff.beaumont.k12.tx.us/lkirk/default_files/frame.htm
Our future is in the STaRs!
technology growth requiresadministrator, teacher, student, and community
involvement
www.beaumont.k12.tx.us/sch/smith.htm
thank you
![FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ......Pressler & Pressler, LLP, No. 11-7593, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81058 *21 (D.N.J. May 25, 2017) (“through [s]ection 1692e of the FDCPA, Congress](https://img.dokumen.tips/doc/110x75/5f5e44e054de0d79c83b3e39/for-the-eastern-district-of-wisconsin-pressler-pressler-llp-no.jpg)
