View
115
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
For the IB Diploma Programme Biology course.
Citation preview
Statistical AnalysisIB Diploma Biology
Stephen Taylor
Image Hummingbird Checks Out Flower httpwwwflickrcomphotos25659032N077200193254 Found on flickrcc net
Assessment Statements Obj
111State that error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data Range and standard deviation show the variability spread in the data 95 Confidence Interval error bars suggest significance of difference where there is no
overlap 1
112Calculate the mean and standard deviation of a set of values Using Excel (Formula =STDEV(rawdata)) Using your calculator
2
113State that the term standard deviation (s) is used to summarize the spread of values around the mean and that 68 of all data fall within (plusmn) 1 standard deviation of the mean
1
114Explain how the standard deviation is useful for comparing the means and the spread of data between two or more samples A greater standard deviation shows a greater variability of data around the mean This can be used to infer reliability in methods or results
3
115Deduce the significance of the difference between two sets of data using calculated values for t and the appropriate tables Using t-values t-tables and critical values Directly calculating P values using Excel in lab reports
3
116 Explain that the existence of a correlation does not establish that there is a causal relationship between two variables 3
Assessment statements from Online IB Biology Subject GuideCommand terms httpi-biologynetibdpbiocommand-terms
MrTrsquos Excel Statbookhas guidance and lsquoliversquo examples of tables graphs and statistical tests
httpi-biologynetict-in-ib-biologyspreadsheets-graphingstatexcel
ldquoWhy is this BiologyrdquoVariation in populations
Variability in results
affects
Confidence in conclusions
The key methodology in Biology is hypothesis testing through experimentation
Carefully-designed and controlled experiments and surveys give us quantitative
(numeric) data that can be compared
We can use the data collected to test our hypothesis and form explanations of the
processes involvedhellip but only if we can be confident in our results
We therefore need to be able to evaluate the reliability of a set of data and the significance of any differences we have found in the data
Image Transverse section of part of a stem of a Dead-nettle (Lamium sp) showing+a+vascular+bundle+and+part+of+the+cortex httpwwwflickrcomphotos71183136N086959590092 Found on flickrccnet
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Generic drugs are out-of-patent and are much cheaper than the proprietary (brand-name) equivalents Doctors need to balance needs with available resources Which would you choose
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Means (averages) in Biology are almost never good enough Biological systems (and our results) show variability
Which would you choose now
Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower)
In return for food they pollinate the flower This is an example of mutualism ndash benefit for all
As a result of natural selection hummingbird bills have evolved
Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have
the greater chance of survival
Photo Archilochus colubris from wikimedia commons by Dick Daniels
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Assessment Statements Obj
111State that error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data Range and standard deviation show the variability spread in the data 95 Confidence Interval error bars suggest significance of difference where there is no
overlap 1
112Calculate the mean and standard deviation of a set of values Using Excel (Formula =STDEV(rawdata)) Using your calculator
2
113State that the term standard deviation (s) is used to summarize the spread of values around the mean and that 68 of all data fall within (plusmn) 1 standard deviation of the mean
1
114Explain how the standard deviation is useful for comparing the means and the spread of data between two or more samples A greater standard deviation shows a greater variability of data around the mean This can be used to infer reliability in methods or results
3
115Deduce the significance of the difference between two sets of data using calculated values for t and the appropriate tables Using t-values t-tables and critical values Directly calculating P values using Excel in lab reports
3
116 Explain that the existence of a correlation does not establish that there is a causal relationship between two variables 3
Assessment statements from Online IB Biology Subject GuideCommand terms httpi-biologynetibdpbiocommand-terms
MrTrsquos Excel Statbookhas guidance and lsquoliversquo examples of tables graphs and statistical tests
httpi-biologynetict-in-ib-biologyspreadsheets-graphingstatexcel
ldquoWhy is this BiologyrdquoVariation in populations
Variability in results
affects
Confidence in conclusions
The key methodology in Biology is hypothesis testing through experimentation
Carefully-designed and controlled experiments and surveys give us quantitative
(numeric) data that can be compared
We can use the data collected to test our hypothesis and form explanations of the
processes involvedhellip but only if we can be confident in our results
We therefore need to be able to evaluate the reliability of a set of data and the significance of any differences we have found in the data
Image Transverse section of part of a stem of a Dead-nettle (Lamium sp) showing+a+vascular+bundle+and+part+of+the+cortex httpwwwflickrcomphotos71183136N086959590092 Found on flickrccnet
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Generic drugs are out-of-patent and are much cheaper than the proprietary (brand-name) equivalents Doctors need to balance needs with available resources Which would you choose
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Means (averages) in Biology are almost never good enough Biological systems (and our results) show variability
Which would you choose now
Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower)
In return for food they pollinate the flower This is an example of mutualism ndash benefit for all
As a result of natural selection hummingbird bills have evolved
Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have
the greater chance of survival
Photo Archilochus colubris from wikimedia commons by Dick Daniels
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
MrTrsquos Excel Statbookhas guidance and lsquoliversquo examples of tables graphs and statistical tests
httpi-biologynetict-in-ib-biologyspreadsheets-graphingstatexcel
ldquoWhy is this BiologyrdquoVariation in populations
Variability in results
affects
Confidence in conclusions
The key methodology in Biology is hypothesis testing through experimentation
Carefully-designed and controlled experiments and surveys give us quantitative
(numeric) data that can be compared
We can use the data collected to test our hypothesis and form explanations of the
processes involvedhellip but only if we can be confident in our results
We therefore need to be able to evaluate the reliability of a set of data and the significance of any differences we have found in the data
Image Transverse section of part of a stem of a Dead-nettle (Lamium sp) showing+a+vascular+bundle+and+part+of+the+cortex httpwwwflickrcomphotos71183136N086959590092 Found on flickrccnet
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Generic drugs are out-of-patent and are much cheaper than the proprietary (brand-name) equivalents Doctors need to balance needs with available resources Which would you choose
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Means (averages) in Biology are almost never good enough Biological systems (and our results) show variability
Which would you choose now
Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower)
In return for food they pollinate the flower This is an example of mutualism ndash benefit for all
As a result of natural selection hummingbird bills have evolved
Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have
the greater chance of survival
Photo Archilochus colubris from wikimedia commons by Dick Daniels
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
ldquoWhy is this BiologyrdquoVariation in populations
Variability in results
affects
Confidence in conclusions
The key methodology in Biology is hypothesis testing through experimentation
Carefully-designed and controlled experiments and surveys give us quantitative
(numeric) data that can be compared
We can use the data collected to test our hypothesis and form explanations of the
processes involvedhellip but only if we can be confident in our results
We therefore need to be able to evaluate the reliability of a set of data and the significance of any differences we have found in the data
Image Transverse section of part of a stem of a Dead-nettle (Lamium sp) showing+a+vascular+bundle+and+part+of+the+cortex httpwwwflickrcomphotos71183136N086959590092 Found on flickrccnet
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Generic drugs are out-of-patent and are much cheaper than the proprietary (brand-name) equivalents Doctors need to balance needs with available resources Which would you choose
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Means (averages) in Biology are almost never good enough Biological systems (and our results) show variability
Which would you choose now
Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower)
In return for food they pollinate the flower This is an example of mutualism ndash benefit for all
As a result of natural selection hummingbird bills have evolved
Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have
the greater chance of survival
Photo Archilochus colubris from wikimedia commons by Dick Daniels
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Generic drugs are out-of-patent and are much cheaper than the proprietary (brand-name) equivalents Doctors need to balance needs with available resources Which would you choose
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Means (averages) in Biology are almost never good enough Biological systems (and our results) show variability
Which would you choose now
Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower)
In return for food they pollinate the flower This is an example of mutualism ndash benefit for all
As a result of natural selection hummingbird bills have evolved
Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have
the greater chance of survival
Photo Archilochus colubris from wikimedia commons by Dick Daniels
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Generic drugs are out-of-patent and are much cheaper than the proprietary (brand-name) equivalents Doctors need to balance needs with available resources Which would you choose
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Means (averages) in Biology are almost never good enough Biological systems (and our results) show variability
Which would you choose now
Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower)
In return for food they pollinate the flower This is an example of mutualism ndash benefit for all
As a result of natural selection hummingbird bills have evolved
Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have
the greater chance of survival
Photo Archilochus colubris from wikimedia commons by Dick Daniels
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
ldquoWhich medicine should I prescriberdquo
Image from httpwwwmsforginternational-activity-report-2010-sierra-leoneDonate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good httpi-biologynetaboutbiology4good
Means (averages) in Biology are almost never good enough Biological systems (and our results) show variability
Which would you choose now
Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower)
In return for food they pollinate the flower This is an example of mutualism ndash benefit for all
As a result of natural selection hummingbird bills have evolved
Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have
the greater chance of survival
Photo Archilochus colubris from wikimedia commons by Dick Daniels
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower)
In return for food they pollinate the flower This is an example of mutualism ndash benefit for all
As a result of natural selection hummingbird bills have evolved
Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have
the greater chance of survival
Photo Archilochus colubris from wikimedia commons by Dick Daniels
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird)
To do this they need to collect sufficientrelevant reliable data so they can testthe Null hypothesis (H0) that
ldquothere is no significant difference in bill length between the two speciesrdquo
Photo Archilochus colubris (male) wikimedia commons by Joe Schneid
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
The sample size must be large enough to provide
sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical
tests for significance
We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools
and error in our results
Photo Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons)
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean s
Calculate the mean using bull Your calculator (sum of values n)
bull Excel
=AVERAGE(highlight raw data)
n = sample size The bigger the better In this case n=10 for each group
All values should be centred in the cell with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s
Raw data and the mean need to have consistent decimal places (in line with uncertainty of the measuring tool)
Uncertainties must be included
Descriptive table title and number
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
DELETE
X
DELETE
X
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Descriptive title with graph number
Labeled point
Y-axis clearly labeled with uncertainty
Make sure that the y-axis begins at zero
x-axis labeled
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C latirostris
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
From the means alone you might conclude that C latirostris has a longer bill than A colubris
But the mean only tells part of the story
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
httpclick4biologyinfoc4b1gcStathtm
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
httpmathbitscomMathBitsTINSectionStatistics1Spreadsheethtml
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data
Table 1 Raw measurements of bill length in A colubris and C latirostris Bill length (plusmn01mm) n A colubris C latirostris
1 130 170
2 140 180
3 150 180
4 150 180
5 150 190
6 160 190
7 160 190
8 180 200
9 180 200
10 190 200
Mean 159 188 s 191 103
Standard deviation can have one more decimal place =STDEV (highlight RAW data)
Which of the two sets of data has
a The longest mean bill length
b The greatest variability in the data
C latirostris
A colubris
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data
Which of the two sets of data has
a The highest mean
b The greatest variability in the data
A
B
Error bars could represent standard deviation range or confidence intervals
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Put the error bars for standard deviation on our graph
Delete the horizontal error bars
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
00
50
100
150
200
A colubris 159mm
C latirostris 188mm
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris (error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Title is adjusted to show the source of the error bars This is very important
You can see the clear difference in the size of the error bars
Variability has been visualised
The error bars overlap somewhat
What does this mean
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data
Large overlap No overlap
Lots of shared data points within each data set
Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other
Any difference is most likely due to chance
No (or very few) shared data points within each data set
Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other
The difference is more likely to be lsquorealrsquo
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
-30
20
70
120
170
220
A colubris 159mm(n=10)
C latirostris 188mm(n=10)
Graph 1 Comparing mean bill lengths in two hummingbird species A colubris and C
latirostris(error bars = standard deviation)
Species of hummingbird
Mea
n Bi
ll le
ngth
(plusmn0
1m
m)
Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data
So how do we know if the difference is significant or not
We need to use a statistical test
The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
The Null Hypothesis (H0)
ldquoThere is no significant differencerdquo
This is the lsquodefaultrsquo hypothesis that we always testIn our conclusion we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it
A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant bull If we accept H0 then the means are not significantly different bull If we reject H0 then the means are significantly different
Rememberbull We are never lsquotryingrsquo to get a difference We design carefully-controlled experiments and
then analyse the results using statistical analysis
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
What happens to the value of P as the confidence in the results increases
What happens to the critical value as the confidence level increases
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
P value = 01 005 002 001confidence 90 95 98 99
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 2 292 430 696 992 3 235 318 454 584 4 213 278 375 460 5 202 257 337 403 6 194 245 314 371 7 189 236 300 350 8 186 231 290 336 9 183 226 282 325
10 181 223 276 317
We can calculate the value of lsquotrsquo for a given set of data and compare it to critical values that depend on the size of our sample and the level of confidence we need
Example two-tailed t-table
ldquoDegrees of Freedom (df)rdquo is the total sample size minus two
We usually use Plt005 (95 confidence) in Biology as our data can be highly variable
Simple explanation we are working in two directions ndash within each population and across populations
ldquocritical valuesrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
2069
005
t was calculated as 215 (this is done for you)
t cv 215 gt 2069
If t lt cv accept H0 (there is no significant difference)If t gt cv reject H0 (there is a significant difference)
Conclusion ldquoThere is a significant difference in the wing spans of the two populations of birdsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
20452045
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is no significant difference in the size of shells between north-side and south-side snail populationsrdquo
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
20862086
2-tailed t-table source httpwwwmedcalcorgmanualt-distributionphp
ldquoThere is a significant difference in the resting heart rates between the two groups of swimmersrdquo
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our resultsOne function (=ttest) compares both sets of data
As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance) we can determine significance directly
In this case P=000051
This is much smaller than 0005 so we are confident that we can
reject H0
The difference is unlikely to be due to chance
Conclusion There is a significant difference in bill length between A colubris and C latirostris
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Two tails we assume data are normally distributed with two lsquotailsrsquo moving away from mean Type 2 (unpaired) we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population
(Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B)
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
95 Confidence Intervals can also be plotted as error bars
These give a clearer indication of the significance of a resultbull Where there is overlap there is not a significant differencebull Where there is no overlap there is a significant difference bull If the overlap (or difference) is small a t-test should still be carried out
no overlap
=CONFIDENCENORM(005stdevsamplesize)eg =CONFIDENCENORM(005C1510)
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Error bars can have very different purposes
Standard deviation bull You really need to know thisbull Look for relative size of barsbull Used to indicate spread of most
of the data around the meanbull Can imply reliability of data
95 Confidence Intervalsbull Adds value to labs where we are
looking for differences bull Look for overlap not size
bull Overlap no sig diff bull No overlap sig dif
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Students watched a one-minute video of a lecture In one video the lecturer was fluent and engaging In the other video the lecturer was less fluent
They predicted how much they would learn on the topic (genetics) and this was compared to their actual score
(Error bars = standard deviation)
Is there a significant difference in the actual learning
n=21 n=21
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Interesting Study Do ldquoBetterrdquo Lecturers Cause More Learning
Find out more here httppriceonomicscomis-this-why-ted-talks-seem-so-convincing
Evaluate the study 1 What do the error bars (standard deviation) tell us about reliability 2 How valid is the study in terms of sufficiency of data (population sizes (n))
n=21 n=21
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Dog fleas jump higher that cat fleas winner of the IgNobel prize for Biology 2008
httpw
ww
youtubecomw
atchv=fJEZg4QN
760
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
P value = 01 005 002 001 0005confidence 90 95 98 99 9950
degrees of freedom
1 631 1271 3182 6366 12734 2 292 430 696 992 1409 3 235 318 454 584 745 4 213 278 375 460 560 5 202 257 337 403 477 6 194 245 314 371 432 7 189 236 300 350 403 8 186 231 290 336 383 9 183 226 282 325 369
10 181 223 276 317 358
degrees of freedom
11 180 220 272 311 350 12 178 218 268 305 343 13 177 216 265 301 337 14 176 214 262 298 333 15 175 213 260 295 329 16 175 212 258 292 325 17 174 211 257 290 322 18 173 210 255 288 320 19 173 209 254 286 317 20 172 209 253 285 315
degrees of freedom
21 172 208 252 283 314 22 172 207 251 282 312 23 171 207 250 281 310 24 171 206 249 280 309 25 171 206 249 279 308 26 171 206 248 278 307 27 170 205 247 277 306 28 170 205 247 276 305 29 170 205 246 276 304 30 170 204 246 275 303
degrees of freedom
31 170 204 245 274 302 32 169 204 245 274 302 33 169 203 244 273 301 34 169 203 244 273 300 35 169 203 244 272 300 36 169 203 243 272 299 37 169 203 243 272 299 38 169 202 243 271 298 39 168 202 243 271 298 40 168 202 242 270 297
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Cartoon from httpwwwxkcdcom552
Correlation does not imply causation but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing look over there
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
From MrTrsquos Excel Statbook
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Interpreting Graphs See ndash Think ndash Wonder
See What is factual about the graph bull What are the axesbull What is being plottedbull What values are present
Think How is the graph interpretedbull What relationship is presentbull Is cause impliedbull What explanations are possible and
what explanations are not possible
Wonder Questions about the graphbull What do you need to know more about
See ndash Think - WonderVisible Thinking Routine
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
httpdiabetes-obesityfindthedataorgb240Correlations-between-diabetes-obesity-and-physical-activity
Diabetes and obesity are lsquorisk factorsrsquo of each other There is a strong correlation between them but does this mean one causes the other
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Correlation does not imply causality
Pirates vs global warming from httpenwikipediaorgwikiFlying_Spaghetti_MonsterPirates_and_global_warming
Where correlations exist we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables ndash conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other
To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need bull One clearly identified independent variablebull Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the
independent variablebull Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the
dependent variable
We need sufficient relevant repeatable and statistically significant data
Some known causal relationships bull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global warmingbull Atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesisbull Temperature and enzyme activity
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
Flamenco Dancer by Steve Coreyhttpwwwflickrcomphotos22016744N067952552148
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen
i-Biologynet
This is a Creative Commons presentation It may be linked and embedded but not sold or re-hosted
Please consider a donation to charity via Biology4GoodClick here for more information about Biology4Good charity donations
IBiologyStephen