Upload
jeffrey-hart
View
129
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
From McCarthyism to Multimedia Mergers 1950-54 McCarthyism and the Blacklist 1964 End of the Production Code Hollywood reacts to the political movements of the
1960s (civil rights, the anti-war movement) 1970s Rise of the “movie brats” and the new
blockbuster films 1980s Multimedia Mergers and the emergence of the
new infotainment technologies
Important Changes in Television
Rise of the 4th network (Fox). Rapid spread of VCRs. Cable TV: many new cable networks and cable
channels with specialized content. Future prospect of competition involving over-the-
air broadcasters, cable operators, satellite broadcasters, and phone companies.
The Home Theater and Cocooning
Main movie-going is by young people on dates.
Families are retreating to “home theaters.”
Cocooning is a general trend in the US.
Siliwood Digital technology
already used in film production and post-production.
Studios use the Internet to advertise products.
Digital technology will be used increasingly for distribution.
Main Members of the Frankfurt School
Theodor Adorno Max Horkheimer Herbert Marcuse Walter Benjamin Leo Lowenthal
Need to see the school asan offshoot of Marxism,with key issues being thefailure of the European masses to rise to support the revolutionin Russia and the rise of Fascism in Europe in the 1930s.
Key Ideas of Theodor Adorno Popular culture in capitalist societies creates a false
sense of “needs” in the public, thereby serving the dominant capitalist classes
Cultural goods become commodified and fetishized and judged on the basis of their exchange value and not their intrinsic value
Diddy Mercedes Commercial
The Creation of False Needs “Capitalist productive forces are capable, according to
the [Frankfurt] School, of producing such vast amounts of wealth through waste production like military expenditure that ‘false needs’ can be created and met.”
Source: Dominic Strinati, An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture, p. 59.
Elements of Theodor Adorno’s Theory of Commodity Fetishism
Taking off from Marx’s distinction between exchange value and use value of commodities, Adorno says exchange value dominates use value in capitalist society via commodity fetishism = “the fantastic form of a relation” defined by a thing (money) and the value of objects in capitalist consumer societies
Source: Strinati, p. 57.
Adorno on the Culture Industry “The culture industry intentionally integrates
its consumers from above.” “The customer is not king, as the culture
industry would have us believe, not its subject but its object.”
“.. The concepts of order which it hammers into human beings are always those of the status quo.”
Source: Strinati, pp. 62-63.
Theories of Walter Benjamin Marginal member of
the Frankfurt School His major work, The
Arcades project, was partially lost when Benjamin attempted to escape Nazi-occupied France by walking over the border to Spain.
Benjamin’s Ideas about Commodities “The dreams of the capitalist era are embodied in
commodities. In their ensemble these constitute a phantasmagoria, constantly changing shape according to the tides of fashion, and offered to crowds of enchanted worshippers as the embodiment of their deepest desires.”
Source: Essay on Benjamin by J.M. Coetzee at http://lists.tamil.com/lists/it/2001-01/msg00053.html
The Origins of Postmodernism
Rejection of the ideologies of the 19th century in light of the two World Wars and the holocaust.
Rejection of objectivity as the sole criterion of truth.
Emphasis on the importance multiple perspectives.
Michel Foucault
Postmodernist Preoccupations Consumption rather than production Growing importance of:
advertising marketing design architecture TV journalism raider capitalism
Meta-narratives are in decline along withclass-based categories like family,neighborhood, religion, trade unions,and the nation-state.
Strinati, pp. 238-9.
Postmodernism and Contemporary Cinema
“From the postmodern point of view, contemporary cinema is seen to be indulging in nostalgia, living off its past, ransacking it for ideas, recycling its images and plots and cleverly citing it in self-conscious postmodern parodies.”
Strinati, p. 243.