Ipcrf 2016 hinabay

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERSName of Employee RIGINO T. MACUNAY, JR. Name of Rater DALIA P. RENOMERONPosition Teacher -I Position Head Teacher -IReview Period June 2015-March 2016 Date of Review April 2016Bureau/Center/Service/Division DepEd, Leyte Division

Major Final Outpu

tKRA OBJECTIVE/s TIMELIN

E

WEIGHT PER KRA

PERFORMANCEINDICATORS

ACTUAL

RESULT

RATING

SCORE

KRA 1 I. Teaching-Learning Process 1. Prepared 135 complete set of

lessons plans throughout the rating period.

2. Utilized Visuals / Printed IM’s and other Manipulative instructional materials that are appropriate to the lesson’s objective

June - March

June - March

(35%)

5%

12%

5- Prepared 180 and above complete set of lesson plans4- Prepared 158 – 179 complete set of lesson plans3- Prepared 135 – 157 complete set of lesson plans2- Prepared 114 – 134 complete set of

lesson plans1- Prepared 113 – and below complete

set of lesson plans

5- Utilized 5 varied instructional materials4- Utilized 4 varied instructional materials3- Utilized 3 varied instructional materials2- Utilized 2 varied instructional materials1- Utilized 1 varied instructional material

5 x.05

5x.12

0.250

o.600

3. a. (For classroom advisers) Established and maintained a classhome that is conducive for learning throughout the year with at least 75% of the Division Standard Classroom Evaluation Checklist achieved.

(Refer to the Division Standard Classroom Evaluation Checklist for Elem. And Sec.)

3. b. ( For special subject teachers) Prepared an updated board structuring and others required of the subject / assignment with 75% accomplishment. (Refer to monitoring checklist.)

4. Taught all competencies in the Budget of Lesson in all subject areas with 75% mastery

June - March

9%

5%

5- Met 96 – 100% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist

4- Met 86 -95% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist

3- Met 75- 85% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist

2- Met 50 – 74% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist

1- Met only 49% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist

5- Accomplished 100% of the items

4-Accomplished 86 – 99% of the items



1- Accomplished only 49% and below

5- 95% and above of competencies were taught with at least 75% mastery4 – 85 – 94% of competencies were taught with at least 75% mastery3- 75- 84% of competencies were taught with at least 75% mastery2- 65 – 74% of competencies were taught with at least 75% mastery1- 64% and below of competencies were

4 x.09

4 x.05

0.360

0.200

KRA 2

Pupils/Students Outcomes

5. Constructed / Updated 80 complete indexed IM’s / e IM’s ( 10 per subject area assigned).

1. Attained an average MPS of 75% in the NAT

2. Attained 0 drop-out rate in all classes handled

3. Zero-out non-readers ( for Grades 1 to 10)(Based on EGRA/ PHIL-IRI result)

June - March

June - March

June - March

June - March

June - March

4%

30%

5%

3%

3%

3%

taught with at least 75% mastery5- 100 or more completed indexed

IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated

4- 90 – 99 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated

3- 80-89 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated

2- 70-79 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated

1 – 69 and below completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated

5- attained 75% and above MPS4- attained 70 -74% MPS3- attained 65- 69 MPS2- attained 60 -64% MPS1- attained 59% and above MPS

5- 0 drop-out rate4- 0.1 – 1.0 %drop-out rate3- 1.1 – 2.0% drop-out rate2- 2.1 – 3.0% drop-out rate1- above 3.0 % drop- out rate

5- 0 non-reader4- non- reader is only 1-2% of the class3-non-reader is only 3-4% of the class2- non-reader is only 5-6% of the class1- non-reader is 7% and above of the class

5 - 0 non- numerates

3 X.04

5X.05

4 X.03

5X.03

5X.03

0.120

1.53

0.250

0.120

0.150

0.150

4. Zero-out non-numerates (based on EGMA and other tests)

5. Increased the number of readers from non-reader to frustration level; from frustration to instructional /independent level in all classes handled(Note: Non-advisers will take the reading performance of the classes handled)

6. Zero-out failure rate in all classes handled

7. a. Updated school records (for teachers with advisory class)

June – March

June – March

June – March

3%

4%

3%

4 – non numerates is only 1-2% of the class3 – non-numerates is only 3-4% of the

class2- non-numerates is only 5-6% of the class1- non-numerates is 7% and above of the class

5-increased 5 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level4- increased 4 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level3- increased 3 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level2- increased 2 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level1- increased 1 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level

5- 0 failure rate4- average of 1-2 % failure rate3- average of 3-4 % failure rate2- average of 5-6 % failure rate1- average of 7% and above failure rate

5-all School Records listed below are updated Class Records/Grade Sheets

5 X.03

5X.04

4 X.03

0.150

0.200

0.120

SF 1 SF2 SF3 SF 4 SF 5 LIS Portal Class Records Form 138 Form 137 Grade Sheets Summative Test Questions with

TOS SReYA ECCD checklist / card

7 . b. Updated school records ( for special subject teachers )

8. Prepared and submitted any of the following reports as required

Quarterly Periodic Exam Results (MPS)

Oral Reading Test Results (PHIL-

June – March 3%

reflected the bases of students’ rating in all classes/subject areas handled

LIS was updated o or before the deadline

Updated SF 2 every month Updated Monthly Updated SF 1 and SF3 three weeks

after the opening of classes Updated From 138 and 137 every

quarter Updated Form 138,137, 9 and SF 5

t the end of the school year Four Quarterly tests with complete

Table of Specifications4- lacks 1 school record3- lacks 2 school records2- lacks 3 school records1- lacks 4 school records

5 – all School Records updated and /or submitted4- lacks 1 school record3- lacks 2 school records2- lacks 3 school records1- lacks 4 school records

5- Prepared and submitted all reports 2 days earlier than the deadline

4- Prepared and submitted all reports 1 day earlier than the deadline

3- Prepared and submitted all reports on the deadline

4 X.03 0.12

KRA 3

III. School and Community Involvement

IRI Oral and Silent, EGRA, MTB-MLE, Numeracy Test)

Form 48 Action Plan/ CIP Monthly Accomplishment

Report ECCD: Pre/Mid/Post Test SReYA Result Pre-Test /Post –Test Nutritional Status Report PFSTT GAD Report Others (pls. specify) Guidance Action Plan Students Ranklist Others

9. Conducted counselling sessions with supporting evidences.

1. Conducted at least 4 PTA meetings with the following MOV’s:

June – March

June – March

2%

10%

3%

2- Prepared and submitted all reports 1 day after the deadline

1- prepared and submitted all reports 2 days or more after the deadline

5- Conducted counselling sessions 5 times or more per month

4- Conducted counselling sessions 4 times per month

3- Conducted counselling sessions 3 times per month2- Conducted counselling sessions twice per month1- Conducted counselling session once per month

5- conducted 5 or more PTA meetings with complete MOVs

4- conducted 4 PTA meetings with complete MOVs

3- conducted 3 PTA meetings with MOVs

4X.02

5X.03

0.08

1.340

0.150

Agenda Attendance Sheets Minutes of the Meetings Others (pls. specify)

2. Attended School / District Meetings

3. Initiated the conduct of BRIGADA ESKWELA activities

3. Participated in at least three civic-oriented activities

June – March

Year round

June – May

2%

3%

2%

2- conducted 2PTA meetings with MOVs1- conducted 1 PTA meeting with MOVs

5 – 95 – 100% attendance in school /district meetings on time

4- 85 – 94% attendance in school/district meetings on time

3 – 75 -84% attendance in school/district meetings on time

2 – 55 – 74% attendance in school/district meetings on time

1 – 1-54% attendance in school/district meetings on time

5- conducted four (4) BRIGADA ESKWELA activities with complete documentation

4- conducted three (3) BRIGADAESKWELA activities with complete documentation

3- conducted two (2) BRIGADA ESKWELA activities with complete documentation

2- conducted one (1) BRIGADA ESKWELA activity with complete documentation

1- conducted BRIGADA activity with no documentation

5-participated 5 or more civic-oriented activities with MOVs (pictures, certificate)

4- participated 4 civic-oriented activities with MOVs (pictures, certificate)

3- participated 3 civic-oriented activities

5X.02

5X.03

3X.02

0.100

0.150

0.060

KRA 4

Professional Growth

& Development

Plus Factor

A. – Winning Coach /Awardee- Resource Speaker / Trainer- Facilatator- Curriculum writer

B. 100% Daily Attendance

1. Attended In-service trainings of at least 3 days conducted by DepEd

2.Earned units or Degree in post Graduate Studies

20%

10%

10%

5%

with MOVs (pictures, certificate)2- participated 2 civic-oriented activity

with MOVs (pictures, certificate)1- participated only 1 civic-oriented

activity with MOVs (pictures, certificate)

5-International /National Level4-Regional Level3-Division Level2-District Level1-School Based

5- Doctoral degree holder4- earned units in Doctoral degree3-Masteral Degree2-CAR in Masteral Degree1-units in Masteral Degree

5- International Level4- National Level3- Regional Level2- Division Level1- School / District Level

3 X.10

1 X.10

1

0.4600.300

0.100

0.400

C. Action Research

D. Chairmanship

5- Perfect attendance4- 1 to 2 absences3- 3 to 5 absences2- 6 to 8 absences1- 9 or more absences

5- Action Research Replicated by other schools

4- Implemented the Action Research by the SDS / ASDS

3- Approved Action Research by the SDS/ASDS2- Submitted Action Research Proposal to the SDS/ASDS1- Proposed Action Research to the Immediate Supervisor

5- 3 or more chairmanship school level4- 2 chairmanship school level3- 1 chairmanship or 4 or more membership school level2- active member in 3 or more comm. School level

1- active member in 1-2 comm.School level

Overall Rating for Accomplishments

5

0

5

1+4+0+5=11/4=2.75

85.75

0.138

3.868

SUMMARY OF POINTS EARNEDLEGEND:

QUANTITATIVE RATING QUALITATIVE RATINGKRA 1 21 1.530

KRA2 40 1.3404.5-5.0 90-100% OUTSTANDING KRA3 18 0.460

3.5-4.49 70-89% VERY SATISFACTORY KRA4 4 0.400

PLUS FACTOR 2.75 0.1382.5-3.49 50-69% SATISFACTORY1.5-2.49 30-49% UNSATISFACTORY TOTAL 85.75 3.868

BELOW - 1.49 29% AND BELOW POOR DESCRIPTIVE RATING VERY SATISFACTORY

DALIA P. RENOMERON RIGINO T. MACUNAY, JR. Rater Ratee

Approved: TERESITA M. ANTOLIN Principal I

FINAL COPY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MG TEACHERS

Name of Employee EVELIZA P. MADRAZO Name of Rater ERNEL S. MERANOPosition T-I Position TEACHER-IN CHARGEReview Period S.Y. 2015-2016 Date of Review APRIL 2016Bureau/Center/Service/Division DEPED/LEYTE DIVISION

Major Final

OutputKRA OBJECTIVE/s TIMELIN

EWEIGHT PER KRA

PERFORMANCEINDICATORS

ACTUALRESULT

RATING

SCORE

KRA 1 Teaching-Learning Process

3. Prepared 216 complete lesson plans throughout the rating period.

(8 lesson plans/week/grade level)

4. Taught 100% of the competencies in the Budget of Lesson in all subject areas with 75% average MPS of the Quarterly Test.

3. Effectively utilized instructional teaching strategies/techniques/approaches that are appropriate to the lessons’ objective

ICT/Multimedia Teaching

June - March

June - March

June - March

(35%)

5%

5%

5%

5- Prepared 288 above teaching plans for the school year4- Prepared 252-287 teaching Plan for the school year3- Prepared 216-251 teaching plans for the school year2- Prepared 180-215 teaching plans

for the school year1- Prepared 179 and below teaching

plans for the school year

MOV: Weekly Lesson Plan Checklist

5- 80% and above of pupils were able to get 75% MPS in the class

4- 75-79% of pupils were able to get 75% MPS in the class



1- 28% and below of pupils were able to get 75% MPS in the class

MOV: Quarterly Test Result

5- effectively utilized appropriate strategies as evident in 96-100% from the School Head’s observation of the teacher

4- effectively utilized appropriate strategies as evident in 86-95% from the School Head’s

Cooperative learning Individualized Instruction Differentiated Learning Contextual Learning Thematic Teaching Approach Others (pls. Specify)

4. Established and maintained a class home that is conducive for learning throughout the year with at least 75% of the Division Standard Class home Evaluation Checklist.

(For Grade 1-6 teachers refer to the Division Standard class home evaluation checklist for Elem. and Sec.)(For Kindergarten Teachers refer to Kindergarten Monitoring Tools)

June - March 5%

observation of the teacher3- effectively utilized appropriate

strategies as evident in 75-85% from the School Head’s observation of the teacher

2- effectively utilized appropriate strategies as evident in 50-74% from the School Head’s observation of the teacher

1-effectively utilized appropriate strategies as evident in 49% and below from the School Head’s observation of the teacher

MOV: School Head/Master Teacher’s Observation of the Teacher

5-Met 96-100% of the items on the Division Standard Class home evaluation checklist

4- Met 86-95% of the items on the Division Standard Class home evaluation checklist



1- Met only 49% and below of the items on the Division Standard Classhome evaluation checklist

MOV: Division Standard Class Home

5.1 Utilized Visuals/Printed IMs and other Manipulative instructional materials that are appropriate to the lesson’s objective. (for Grade 2-6 teachers only)

ChartsPicturesPpt presentationsAudio/Video clipsRealia

5.2 Implemented Project TIED throughout

the lessons. (for Grade 1 teachers only)

June - March

June - March

5%

5%

Evaluation Checklist

5- ICT/Multimedia, Audio, Visual and Printed and Manipulative instructional materials were utilized throughout the lessons.4- Audio, Visual, Printed and Manipulative instructional materials were utilized throughout the lessons.3- Visual, Printed and other Manipulative instructional materials were utilized throughout the lessons.2- Printed materials were utilized throughout the lessons.1- Innovative instructional materials were not utilized throughout the lessons.

MOV: Indexed IMs Checklist

5- Implemented Project TIED with the utilization of more than 4 ICTs throughout the lessons.

4- Implemented Project TIED with the utilization of 4 ICT throughout the lessons.

3- Implemented Project TIED with the utilization of 3 ICTs throughout the lessons.

2- Implemented Project TIED with

Sub-total

LCD Projector/ White Screen/LED

Laptop/netbook/tabletLesson Plan with TIED

Integration (saved in flashdrive)Printer

6. Constructed 80 complete indexed IMs/ eIMs (10 per subject area).

To be adjusted yearly.

7. Conducted daily RRE in all learning areas based on the CPL

June - March

June - March

5%

5%

the utilization of 2 ICT throughout the lesson.

1- Implemented Project TIED with the utilization of the only 1 ICT throughout the lessons.

5- 100 or more complete indexed IMs/ eIMs were prepared4- 90-99complete indexed IMs/ eIMs were prepared3- 80-89 complete indexed IMs/

eIMs were prepared2- 70-79complete indexed IMs/

eIMs were prepared1- 69 and below complete indexed

IMs/ eIMs were prepared

MOV: Indexed IMs Checklist

5-conducted daily RRE episodes and attained at least 96-100% proficiency level

4-conducted daily RRE episodes and attained at least 86%-95% proficiency level

3- conducted daily RRE episodes and attained at least 75%-85% proficiency level

2- conducted daily RRE episodes and attained at least 50%-74% proficiency level

2- conducted daily RRE episodes and attained at least 49% and below proficiency level

KRA 2

Pupils/Students Outcomes

1. Attained an average MPS of 75% in the following:

NAT

2. Attained 0 drop-out rate in all classes handled

3.1 Zeroed-out non-readers (# of NR/ monthly enrolment) for

Grade 1 teachers only

June - March

June - March

June -March

35%

6%

5%

8%

MOV: CPL

5-attained 75% MPS and above4-attained 66-74% MPS3-attained 57-65% MPS2-attained 29-56% MPS1-attained 0-28% MPS

MOV: NAT Result

5- 0 drop-out rate4- 0.1-1.0% drop-out rate3- 1.1-2.0% drop-out rate2- 2.1-3.0% drop-out rate1- above 3.0% drop-out rate

5-0 non-reader4-non-reader is only 0.1-1.0% of the

class3-non-reader is only 1.1-2.0% of the

class2-non-reader is only 2.1-3.0% of the

class1-non-reader is above 3.0% of the

class

3.1.1 Increased the number of readers from frustration level to instructional/independent level in all classes handled

(Note: Non-advisers will take the reading performance of the classes handled) (for Grade 2-6 teachers only)

4. Zeroed-out non-numerates ( # of NN/ monthly enrolment)

Unified District tool

June - March

June - March

June - March

(8%)

4%

3%

5- increased 5 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level


3-increased 3 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level


1- increased 1 reader from current reading level to the next higher reading level

MOV: Phil-IRI

5- 0 non-numerate4- non-numerate is only 0.1-1.0% of

the class3- non-numerate is only 1.1-2.0% of

the class2- non-numerate is only 2.1-3.0% of

the class1- non-numerate is above 3.0% of the class

MOV: Numeracy Test

5- 0% failure rate4- failure is only 1% of the class3- failure is only 2% of the class2- failure is only 3% of the class1- failure is 4% and above of the

5. Zeroed- out failure rate

6. Updated school records SF1 SF2 SF3 SF5 LIS Portal Class Records Form 138 Form 137 Grade Sheets Summative Test Questions

with TOS

June - March

June - March

3%

3%

class

MOV: LIS Forms

5 - all School Records listed below are updated:

Class Records/ Grade Sheets reflected the bases of students’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled

LIS was updated on or before the deadline

Updated SF2 every month Updated SF1 and SF3 three

weeks after the opening of classes

Updated Form 138 and 137 every quarter

Updated Form 138, 137, 9 and SF5 at the end of the school year

Four Quarterly tests with complete Table of Specifications

4- lacks 1 school record3- lacks 2 school records2- lacks 3 school records1- lacks 4 school records

MOV: School Record Checklist

5- Prepared and submitted all reports 2 days earlier than the deadline

4- Prepared and submitted all

Sub-total

KRA 3

7. Prepared and submitted the following reports as required

Quarterly Periodic Exam Results (MPS)

Oral Reading Test Results (PHIL IRI Oral & Silent, EGRA, MTB-MLE)

Numeracy Test Result Form 48 Monthly Accomplishment

Report Pre-test/Post test Nutritional Status Report PPFT (Grade 4-6) Others (pls. specify)

8. Conducted counselling sessions to at least 3 pupils/ students with supporting evidences.

June - March 3%

reports 1 day before the deadline3. Prepared and submitted all

reports on the deadline2- Prepared and submitted all

reports 1 day after than the deadline

1- Prepared and submitted all reports 2 days and more after the deadline.

MOV: File copy of Reports Submitted

5- Conducted 5 counselling sessions with supporting evidences

4- Conducted 4 counselling sessions with supporting evidences

3- Conducted 3 counselling sessions with supporting evidences2- Conducted 2 counselling sessions with supporting evidences1- Conducted 1 counselling session with supporting evidences

MOV: Pictures, Anecdotal Records, Counselling Forms

School and Community Involvement

2. Conducted at least 4 PTA meetings

2. Initiated the conduct of at least 2 BRIGADA activities year-round

June - March

Year Round

10%

4%

2%

5- conducted 6 or more PTA meetings with complete MOVs

4- conducted 5 PTA meetings with complete MOVs



1- conducted 2 PTA meeting with MOVs

MOV: Attendance Sheets, Minutes of the Meetings, Picture

5- conducted four (4) BRIGADA activities with complete documentation

4- conducted three (3) BRIGADA activities with complete documentation

3- conducted two (2) BRIGADA activities with complete documentation

2- conducted one (1) BRIGADA activity with complete documentation

1- conducted BRIGADA activity with no documentation

Sub-total

KRA 4

Professional Growth

& Development

3. Participated in at least three civic-oriented activities

June- May

Year Round

Year Round

4%

15%

5%

10%

MOVs: Attendance Sheet, Pictures, Narrative Report

5-participated 5 or more civic-oriented activities with MOVs (pictures, certificate)



2- participated 2 civic-oriented activity with MOVs (pictures, certificate)

1- participated only 1 civic-oriented activity with MOVs (pictures, certificate)

5-International /National Level4-Regional Level3-Division Level2-District Level1-School Based

5- Doctoral degree holder4.5 Earned Complete Academic

Requirements in Ph.D./Ed.D.

Sub-total

Plus Factor

1. Attended In-service trainings of at least 3 days within a year conducted by DepEd

2.Earned degree or units in Graduate Studies

Winning Coach/ Awardee Resource Speaker/ Trainer Chairmanship Facilitator

100% daily attendance and other school related activities

June - March

June- March

June- March

5%

4- Master’s degree holder3.5- Earned 36 units in MA/CAR3-Earned 27 units in MA2-Earned 18 units in MA1-Earned 9 units and below in Post

Graduate study.0- No Units in MA

5- International/ National Level4- Regional Level3- Division Level2- Area Level1- District Level

MOV: Pictures, Certificates

5- Perfect attendance4- 1 to 2 absences3- 3 to 5 absences2- 6 to 8 absences1- 9 or more absences

MOV: Teacher’s Attendance

5- International/National participation

4- Regional participation

Sub-total

Participated in academic and non-academic competitions like

- MTAP- Scouting- DAMATH- Journalism,

Congressional &, Provincial Meets

- Curriculum Writer-

Conducted Action Research- ers (pls. Specify

3- Division participation2- Area/District participation1- School participation

MOV: Certificate of Participation

5- Accomplished an Action Research with MOVs4- Implementation of an Action Research with MOVs3- Approved Action Research by

the SDS/ASDS2- Submitted Action Research Proposal to the SDS/ASDS1- Proposed Action Research to the Immediate Supervisor

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT

ERNEL S. MERANO EVELIZA P. MADRAZO Rater Ratee

SUMMARY OF POINTS EARNEDLEGEND:

QUANTITATIVE RATING QUALITATIVE RATINGKRA 1KRA2

4.5-5.0 90-100% OUTSTANDING KRA33.5-4.49 70-89% VERY SATISFACTORY KRA4

2.5-3.49 50-69% SATISFACTORY PLUS FACTOR1.5-2.49 30-49% UNSATISFACTORY TOTAL

BELOW - 1.49 29% AND BELOW POOR DESCRIPTIVE RATING

Republic of the PhilippinesDepartment of Education (DepEd)

Region VIII (Eastern Visayas)DIVISION OF LEYTE

District of InopacanDELOS SANTOS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

For Teachers

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT

& REVIEW (IPCR)