Main Presenta+on Title 20.12.10 U.S. Industrial Technologies Programs & Superior Energy Performance
Global industrial energy use is projected to increase 1.4% per year through 2030.
Notes: Projected data based on a business-‐as-‐usual reference case scenario. Quads refers to quadrillion Btu (Bri+sh thermal units). Source: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Informa+on Administra+on, Interna'onal Energy Outlook 2009.
0
50
100
150
200
250
2006 2010 2020 2030
Del
iver
ed E
nerg
y U
se (Q
uads
)!
China!
India!
Brazil!
Rest of World!
Russia!
United States!
OECD Europe!
% Growth 2006-‐2030
89%
75%
67%
38%
24%
4%
2%
Global industrial sector energy use, 2006-‐2030
Projected Global Industrial Energy Use
U.S. industry accounts for about one-‐third of all U.S. energy consumpHon.
Petroleum Natural Gas Electricity*
Coal and Coke Renewable Energy
Residential 21.8%
Industry 31.4%
Commercial 18.7%
Transportation 28.1% 35.8%
34.0%
14.0%*
7.7% 8.6%
Reducing U.S. industrial energy intensity is essenHal to achieving naHonal energy and carbon goals.
* Excludes losses Source: Annual Energy Review 2008, EIA.
U.S. Industry Energy Use
Measures developed at the State and Federal level
ImplementaHon toolbox
United States (Federal): simplified
Mandatory standards on equipment
Voluntary programs, including the Superior Energy Performance Program
Program led by the Department of Energy’s Advanced Manufacturing Office
Develop Next-‐GeneraHon Manufacturing Processes & Materials
• Manufacturing processes that limit energy intensity
• Materials technologies that lower life-cycle energy consumption and provide low-cost, high performance.
Foster the Energy Management Services Industry Identify, deploy, certify, and reward effective energy management
• Develop tools and protocols to enable industry to measure and manage energy usage • Promote education and hands-on training for a new generation of energy management
engineers.
28 MW, roll-‐to-‐roll manufacturing line for triple-‐junc+on amorphous silicon modules
Energy efficiency can yield cost, producHvity, energy supply resiliency, and compeHHveness benefits to industry.
Policy: Support Research and Development on Energy Efficiency Technology in Industry
Voluntary Program – Be^er Buildings, Be^er Plants Challenge
BeYer Buildings, BeYer Plants Challenge Part of President Obama’s Be^er Buildings Ini+a+ve, with the goal of making buildings 20% more efficient by 2020 and saving $40 billion for U.S. organiza+ons.
Key program elements • Companies agree to 10-‐year, 25% energy intensity improvement target • Companies establish baseline year and any progress made toward the target to-‐
date • Companies report annually on their progress • DOE provides tools, training and assistance as needed • DOE provides na+onal recogni+on for their achievements
A voluntary program administered by the U.S. Environmental ProtecHon Agency (EPA) that helps organizaHons improve their environmental and energy performance:
Voluntary Program -‐ENERGY STAR for Industry
Current Industrial Focuses: • Cement • Concrete • Commercial Baking • Corn Refining • Dairy Processing • Food Processing • Glass • Metal Finishing • Motor Vehicle Produc+on • Petrochemicals • Petroleum Refining • Pharmaceu+cals • Prin+ng • Steel
• Develop Energy Performance Indictors to score plant performance
• Establish Best in Class recogniHon for plant performance
• Create Energy Guides that iden+fy best prac+ces and projects
• Promote successful management strategies between companies
www.energystar.gov/industry
Voluntary Program: Superior Energy Performance
A market-‐based, ANSI/ANAB-‐accredited cerHficaHon program that provides industrial and commercial faciliHes with a roadmap for conHnual improvement in energy efficiency while boosHng compeHHveness.
• Develops a transparent system to validate energy performance improvements and management practices
• Encourages broad participation throughout industry
• Supports and builds the energy efficiency market and workforce
Superior Energy Performance for industry will be launched
na+onwide in 2012. http://www.superiorenergyperformance.net
ISO 50001 Energy Management Standard
• Establishes a framework for industrial and commercial facili+es and organiza+ons to manage energy.
• Offers companies an interna+onal approach for
– Corporate sustainability programs – Energy cost reduc+on ini+a+ves – Responding to manufacturing supply chain
demands for energy efficiency improvement
h^p://www1.eere.energy.gov/energymanagement/index.html
ISO 50001: Founda+onal Tool
Status of ISO 50001 • Published June 15, 2011 • Available for purchase from ISO • Developed by ISO Project Commi^ee 242; United States, Brazil, China and United Kingdom co-‐led
• 59 countries par+cipated, 14 of which observed
• Transitioned to TC 242 to develop related standards and manage implementation
CerHficaHon Requirements:
An ANSI/ANAB-‐accredited Verifica+on Body will conduct a third-‐party audit to verify that the following requirements are met:
1. Energy Management System Conformance to ISO 50001 Energy Management Standard
2. Energy Performance Improvement
10
ISO 50001 Components in place: • Baseline • Policy • Plan • Team/Leader
Superior Energy Performance
Single facility ISO 50001 conformance with validated energy performance improvement
ISO 50001
ISO 50001 is a foundaHonal tool that any organizaHon can use to manage energy.
Geong Superior Energy Performance Cer+fied
SEP Performance Criteria for Certification Levels (Draft)!
11
Performance Characteristics Silver Gold Platinum
Energy Performance
Pathway
Energy Performance Improvement
Meets 5% energy performance improvement threshold over the last 3 years.
Meets 10% energy performance improvement threshold over the last 3 years.
Meets 15% energy performance improvement threshold over the last 3 years.
Mature Energy
Pathway
Energy Performance Improvement
Demonstrates an energy performance improvement of 15% or more over the last 10 years.
Demonstrates an energy performance improvement of 15% or more over the last 10 years.
Demonstrates an energy performance improvement of 15% or more over the last 10 years.
Score on Best Practice Scorecard Includes credits for energy management best practices and energy performance improvements beyond 15% over the last 10 years.
• Meets a score of at least 35 and up to 60 out of 100 total points for Best Practice Scorecard
• Minimum of 25 points required for the energy management best practices.
• Meets a score of at least 61 and up to 80 out of 100 total points for Best Practice Scorecard
• Minimum of 25 points required for the energy management best practices and 10 for energy performance.
• Meets a score of at least 81 out of 100 total points for Best Practice Scorecard
• Minimum of 25 points required for the energy management best practices and 10 for energy performance.
• RecogniHon ‒ Publicly recognized as leader in sustainable use of energy resources (local and financial community)
‒ Customers may grant preferred supplier status
• External financial incenHves ‒ Energy efficiency credits (electric u+lity & others) ‒ Poten+al carbon credits (state, region, and na+onal)
• SystemaHc framework for conHnuous improvement ‒ Consistent with ISO 50001 energy management and ASME system assessment standards
‒ Provides tools and resources to assist implementa+on and valida+on of sustained energy performance improvement
Industry and Construction stock CD 01030FRL
Creatas Power & Energy CD 005776
Superior Energy Performance Benefits to Companies
SEP DemonstraHons involve: – Tes+ng ANSI-‐accredited Superior Energy Performance program – Using newly-‐released ISO 50001 energy management standard – Third party verifica+on on energy performance improvement using
measurement & verifica+on protocol – 35 companies in 20 states
Superior Energy Performance Demonstra+ons
www.superiorenergyperformance.net
Industrial ParHcipants:
• 3M Company • Alcoa • Allsteel • Amcor PET • Ascend Performance
Materials • Bentley Prince Street • Bridgestone Tire • Coca-‐Cola
• Cook Composites & Polymers
• Cooper Tire • Cummins • Didion Milling, Inc • Dixie Chemical • Dow Chemical • Eaton • Freescale
Semiconductor • General Dynamics
• Harbec Plas+cs • Haynes Interna+onal • Holcim • Ingersoll Rand • JR Simplot • Kenworth Trucks • Lockheed Mar+n • MedImmune • Neenah Foundry
Company • Nissan
• OLAM Spices • Owens Corning • Republic Conduit • Schneider Electric • Spirax Sarco • Traco • UTC/Sikorsky • United States Mint • Volvo • World Kitchen
Industrial Assessment Centers (IACs) • IACs provide prac+cal in-‐plant training to engineering students at 24
universi+es. Students work directly with small and medium-‐sized manufacturers to iden+fy and implement energy savings opportuni+es.
Suppor+ng Measure: Workforce Development
hYp://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/tech_deployment/iacs.html
• As part of their training, IAC students have par+cipated in more than 15,000 assessments and provided nearly 114,000 recommenda+ons for small and medium-‐sized plants.
• IACs have trained more than 3,000 students to become the next genera+on of energy engineers.
• Nearly 60% of IAC graduates go on to careers in the energy industry.
Resources to help manufacturers reduce energy use and carbon emissions today — and con)nuously improve.
Training • Awareness • Tool User • System /Topic
• Qualified Specialists • Energy Management
Soeware Tools
• Energy and carbon baselining
• Sorware tools for energy management
InformaHon • Tip sheets, case studies • Website, webcasts, databases
• EERE Informa+on Center • Supply chain guidance
Standards • Superior Energy Performance (SEP)
• ISO 50001 • Assessment standards, protocols, and metrics
Technical Assistance
• Tracking and managing energy intensity
• Project feasibility analysis • Resource referrals
Implementa+on Toolbox: Energy Management & Technology Deployment Resources in DOE
Assessments • Energy savings assessments
• Industrial Assessment Centers
• States/u+li+es
Implementa+on Toolbox-‐ Sorware
Energy Performance Tracking Energy Management
eGuide for ISO 50001 ImplementaHon
eGuide Lite
ePEP (Plant Energy Profiler)
Energy Systems Analysis
• Motors • Pumps • Fans • Compressed Air • Steam • Process HeaHng • Data Centers • Simple Calculators
Baselining EnPI Tool
Corporate Energy Performance Tracking
for Be^er Plants partnership
Facility Energy Performance Tracking for Superior Energy
Performance
h^p://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/tech_deployment/sorware.html
17
Implementa+on Toolbox – DOE’s Save Energy Now Assessments
Conduct Plant Visit
Analyze & Report Results
Gather Preliminary
Data Follow-‐up
Train Plant Staff
• Teams are DOE Energy Experts and plant personnel
• Teams focus on fans, pumps compressors, steam or process hea+ng systems.
• Plant personnel trained on DOE sorware tools
Section I: US DOE’s ITP Activities for US Industry
Successful Project ImplementaHon
Energy Manuals
Sorware Tools & Templates Training Modules & Curricula
Best Prac+ces & Success Stories
IAC Results Databases Industrial Assessment Center Knowledge Base Website
Implementa+on Toolbox: Online Assessment Database for Small & Medium Enterprises
Implementa+on Results
DOE Energy Assessment Results From 2006 to 2011, energy assessments were conducted at over 1,000 large plants and 2,300 small-‐ and medium-‐sized facili+es
IdenHfied savings:
Cost -‐ $1.6 billion in annual savings
Energy -‐ 220 trillion btus
CO2 -‐ 11 million metric tons
Implemented savings to date:
Cost – $ 310 million in annual savings
Energy -‐ 45 trillion btus
Carbon – 3 million metric tons
Global Superior Energy Performance (GSEP)
GSEP Partnership
• GSEP aims to reduce global energy use in industrial facili+es and commercial buildings in order to improve energy security and to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by: – Encouraging industrial facili+es and commercial buildings to pursue con+nuous improvements in
energy efficiency – Promo+ng public-‐private partnerships for coopera+on on specific technologies or in individual
energy-‐intensive sectors
GSEP was announced in July 2010 at the Clean Energy Ministerial, which convened 25 energy ministers from 20 countries and the European Commission.
COOL ROOFS WORKING
GROUP (Lead: U.S.)
STEEL WORKING
GROUP (Lead: Japan)
CEMENT WORKING
GROUP (Lead: Japan)
POWER WORKING
GROUP (Lead: Japan)
ENERGY MGMT WORKING
GROUP (Lead: U.S.)
CHP WORKING
GROUP (Lead: Finland)
Thank You! James Quinn Head – North America Programs Institute for Industrial Productivity www.iipnetwork.org [email protected]
Recommended
