1
Origin of LifeOrigin of Life
2
Aristotle (384 –322 BC)Aristotle (384 –322 BC)
Proposed the theory of Proposed the theory of spontaneous generationspontaneous generationAlso called Also called abiogenesisabiogenesisIdea that Idea that living things can living things can arise from nonlivingarise from nonliving matter matterIdea lasted almost Idea lasted almost 2000 2000 yearsyears
3
4
Spontaneous GenerationSpontaneous Generation
For centuriesFor centuries, , people basedpeople based their their beliefsbeliefs onon their their interpretations of interpretations of what they what they sawsaw going on in the world going on in the world around them without testing around them without testing their ideastheir ideas They They didn’t use the scientific didn’t use the scientific methodmethod to arrive at answers to to arrive at answers to their questionstheir questionsTheir conclusions were based on Their conclusions were based on untested observationsuntested observations
5
Examples of Examples of Spontaneous Spontaneous GenerationGeneration
6
Example #1Example #1
Observation:Observation: Every year in the Every year in the spring, the spring, the Nile River floodedNile River flooded areas of Egypt along the river, areas of Egypt along the river, leaving behind nutrient-rich leaving behind nutrient-rich mud that enabled the people mud that enabled the people to grow that year’s crop of to grow that year’s crop of food. However, along with the food. However, along with the muddy soil, muddy soil, large numbers of large numbers of frogsfrogs appeared that weren’t appeared that weren’t around in drier timesaround in drier times
7
Example #1Example #1Conclusion:Conclusion: It was It was perfectly obvious to people perfectly obvious to people back then that back then that muddy soil muddy soil gave rise to the frogsgave rise to the frogs
8
Example #2Example #2
Observation:Observation: In many parts of In many parts of Europe, medieval farmers Europe, medieval farmers stored stored grain in barnsgrain in barns with with thatched roofs (like thatched roofs (like Shakespeare’s house). As a Shakespeare’s house). As a roof aged, it was not roof aged, it was not uncommon for it to start uncommon for it to start leaking. This could lead to leaking. This could lead to spoiled or moldy grainspoiled or moldy grain, and of , and of course there were course there were lots of mice lots of mice aroundaround..
9
Example #2Example #2
Conclusion: It was obvious It was obvious to them that the to them that the mice mice came from the moldy came from the moldy grain.grain.
10
Example #3Example #3Observation:Observation: In the cities In the cities centuries ago, there were no centuries ago, there were no sewers, no garbage trucks, no sewers, no garbage trucks, no electricity, and no refrigeration. electricity, and no refrigeration. Sewage flowed down the Sewage flowed down the streets, and chamber pots and streets, and chamber pots and left over foodleft over food were thrown out were thrown out into the streets each morning. into the streets each morning. Many cities also had major Many cities also had major rat rat problemsproblems and a disease called and a disease called Bubonic plagueBubonic plague..
11
Example #3Example #3
Conclusion:Conclusion: Obviously, all Obviously, all the the sewage and garbage sewage and garbage turned into the ratsturned into the rats.
12
Example #4Example #4
Observation:Observation: Since there were Since there were no refrigerators, the no refrigerators, the mandatory, daily trip to the mandatory, daily trip to the butcher shop, especially in butcher shop, especially in summer, summer, meant battling the meant battling the flies around the carcassesflies around the carcasses. . Typically, carcasses were Typically, carcasses were “hung by their heels,” and “hung by their heels,” and customers selected which customers selected which chunk the butcher would carve chunk the butcher would carve off for them. off for them.
13
Example #4Example #4
Conclusion: Obviously, the Obviously, the rotting meatrotting meat that had been that had been hanging in the sun all day hanging in the sun all day was the was the source of the fliessource of the flies. .
14
Abiogenesis RecipesAbiogenesis Recipes
Recipe for bees:Recipe for bees:
Kill a young bullKill a young bull, and , and bury itbury it in an upright in an upright position so that its position so that its horns protrude from the horns protrude from the groundground. After a month, a . After a month, a swarm of bees will fly swarm of bees will fly out of the corpse. out of the corpse.
15
Abiogenesis RecipesAbiogenesis Recipes
Recipe for mice:Recipe for mice:
Place a Place a dirty shirtdirty shirt or some rags or some rags in an in an open pot or barrelopen pot or barrel containing a containing a few grains of few grains of wheatwheat or some wheat bran, and or some wheat bran, and in in 21 days21 days, mice will appear. , mice will appear. There will be adult males and There will be adult males and females present, and they will females present, and they will be capable of mating and be capable of mating and reproducing more mice.reproducing more mice.
16
Disproving Disproving Spontaneous Spontaneous GenerationGeneration
17
Francesco Redi (1668)Francesco Redi (1668)
In 1668, Francesco In 1668, Francesco RediRedi, an , an Italian physician, did an Italian physician, did an experiment with experiment with fliesflies and and wide-mouth jars containing wide-mouth jars containing meatmeat
18
Redi’s ExperimentRedi’s Experiment
Redi used Redi used open & closed open & closed flasksflasks which which contained contained meatmeat.. His His hypothesishypothesis was that was that rotten meat does not turn rotten meat does not turn into flies.into flies. He He observedobserved these flasksthese flasks to see in which one(s) to see in which one(s) maggots would develop.maggots would develop.
19
Redi’s FindingsRedi’s FindingsHe found that if a flask was He found that if a flask was closedclosed with a lid so with a lid so adult adult flies could not get in, no flies could not get in, no maggotsmaggots developed on the developed on the rotting meat within.rotting meat within. In a flask In a flask without a lidwithout a lid, , maggots soon were seenmaggots soon were seen in in the meat because adult flies the meat because adult flies had laid eggs and more had laid eggs and more adult flies soon appeared.adult flies soon appeared.
20
Redi’s (1626-1697) Experiments
Evidence against spontaneous Evidence against spontaneous generation:generation:
1. 1. Unsealed Unsealed – maggots on meat– maggots on meat2. 2. SealedSealed – no maggots on meat – no maggots on meat3. 3. GauzeGauze – few maggots on gauze, none on – few maggots on gauze, none on
meatmeat
21
Results of Redi’s ExperimentsResults of Redi’s Experiments
The results of this The results of this experiment experiment disproved the disproved the idea of spontaneous idea of spontaneous generation for larger generation for larger organisms,organisms, but people still but people still thought microscopic thought microscopic organisms like algae or organisms like algae or bacteria could arise that bacteria could arise that way.way.
22
Francesco RediFrancesco Redi
23
Did Redi Use the Did Redi Use the Scientific Scientific Method?Method?
24
The Scientific MethodThe Scientific MethodObservationObservation
HypothesisHypothesis
ExperimentExperiment
Accept, Reject, or Modify hypothesisAccept, Reject, or Modify hypothesis
25
Step 1 - ObservationStep 1 - Observation
There were flies around There were flies around meat carcasses at the meat carcasses at the Butcher shop.Butcher shop.
Where do the flies come Where do the flies come from?from?
Does rotting meat turn Does rotting meat turn into or produce rotting into or produce rotting flies?flies?
26
Step 2 - HypothesisStep 2 - Hypothesis
Rotten meat does not Rotten meat does not turn into flies. turn into flies. Only flies Only flies can make more flies.can make more flies.
27
Step 3 - TestingStep 3 - Testing
Wide-mouth jarsWide-mouth jars each containing a piece each containing a piece of meat were subjected to several of meat were subjected to several variations of variations of “openness”“openness” while all while all other other variables were kept the same.variables were kept the same.
Control groupControl group — These jars of meat were — These jars of meat were set out set out without lidswithout lids so the meat would be so the meat would be exposed to whatever it might be in the exposed to whatever it might be in the butcher shop.butcher shop.
Experimental group(s)Experimental group(s) — One group of — One group of jars were jars were sealedsealed with lids, and another with lids, and another group of jars had gauze placed over group of jars had gauze placed over them.them.
28
Step 4 - DataStep 4 - Data
Presence or absence of fliesPresence or absence of flies and maggots observed in and maggots observed in each jar was each jar was recordedrecorded..Control groupControl group – flies entered, – flies entered, laid eggs, & maggots laid eggs, & maggots emergedemergedGauze coveredGauze covered – flies on – flies on gauze, but not in jargauze, but not in jarSealed jarsSealed jars – No maggots or – No maggots or flies on the meatflies on the meat
29
Step 5 - ConclusionStep 5 - Conclusion
Only flies can make more fliesOnly flies can make more flies. In the . In the uncovered jarsuncovered jars, flies entered and laid , flies entered and laid eggs on the meat. Maggots hatched from eggs on the meat. Maggots hatched from these eggs and grew into more adult these eggs and grew into more adult flies. Adult flies laid eggs on the gauze on flies. Adult flies laid eggs on the gauze on the gauze-covered jars. These eggs or the the gauze-covered jars. These eggs or the maggots from them dropped through the maggots from them dropped through the gauze onto the meat. In the gauze onto the meat. In the sealed jarssealed jars, , no flies, maggots, nor eggs could enter, no flies, maggots, nor eggs could enter, thus none were seen in those jars. thus none were seen in those jars. Maggots arose only where flies were able Maggots arose only where flies were able to lay eggs. to lay eggs. This experiment disproved This experiment disproved the idea of spontaneous generation for the idea of spontaneous generation for larger organisms.larger organisms.
30
Disproving Disproving Spontaneous Spontaneous Generation of Generation of
MicrobesMicrobes
31
Anton van Leeuwenhoek Anton van Leeuwenhoek (1674)(1674)
Leeuwenhoek began Leeuwenhoek began makingmaking and and looking through looking through simple microscopessimple microscopesHe often made a new microscope for He often made a new microscope for each specimeneach specimenHe He examined waterexamined water and visualized and visualized tiny animals, fungi, algae, and single tiny animals, fungi, algae, and single celled protozoa; celled protozoa; “animalcules”“animalcules”By end of 19By end of 19thth century, these century, these organisms were called organisms were called microbesmicrobes
32
Anton van Leeuwenhoek 1632-Anton van Leeuwenhoek 1632-17231723
33
Leeuwenhoek’s MicroscopeLeeuwenhoek’s Microscope
34
John Needham (1745)John Needham (1745)
Showed that microorganisms Showed that microorganisms flourished in various soups that flourished in various soups that had been exposed to the airhad been exposed to the airClaimed that there was a Claimed that there was a “life “life force” present in the molecules force” present in the molecules of all inorganic matterof all inorganic matter, , including air and the oxygen in including air and the oxygen in it, that could cause it, that could cause spontaneous generation to spontaneous generation to occuroccur
35
Needham’s ResultsNeedham’s Results
Needham’s experiments Needham’s experiments seemed to supportseemed to support the idea the idea of of spontaneous generationspontaneous generationPeople People didn’t realizedidn’t realize bacteria bacteria were already present in were already present in Needham’s soupsNeedham’s soupsNeedham Needham didn’t boil long didn’t boil long enoughenough to kill the microbes to kill the microbes
36
Needham’s ExperimentNeedham’s Experiment
37
Lazzaro Spallanzani’s (1765)Lazzaro Spallanzani’s (1765)
Boiled soups for almost an Boiled soups for almost an hourhour and sealed containers by and sealed containers by melting the slender necks melting the slender necks closedclosed.
The The soups remained clearsoups remained clear..
Later, he Later, he broke the sealsbroke the seals & & the the soups became cloudysoups became cloudy with with microbes. microbes.
38
Spallanzani’s ResultsSpallanzani’s Results
39
ConclusionConclusion
CriticsCritics said sealed vials said sealed vials did not allow enough air did not allow enough air for organisms to survive for organisms to survive and that and that prolonged prolonged heating destroyed “life heating destroyed “life force”force”
Therefore, Therefore, spontaneous spontaneous generation remainedgeneration remained the the theory of the timetheory of the time
40
The Theory The Theory Finally ChangesFinally Changes
41
How Do Microbes Arise?How Do Microbes Arise?
By By 18601860, the debate had become , the debate had become so heated that the so heated that the Paris Academy Paris Academy of Sciencesof Sciences offered a prizeoffered a prize for for any experiments that would help any experiments that would help resolve this conflictresolve this conflict
The The prize was claimed in 1864 by prize was claimed in 1864 by Louis PasteurLouis Pasteur, as he published , as he published the results of an experiment he the results of an experiment he did to disproved spontaneous did to disproved spontaneous generation in microscopic generation in microscopic organismsorganisms
42
Louis Pasteur (1822-1895)Louis Pasteur (1822-1895)
43
Pasteur's ProblemPasteur's Problem
Hypothesis:Hypothesis: Microbes come Microbes come from cells of organisms on from cells of organisms on dust particles in the air; not dust particles in the air; not the air itself.the air itself.
Pasteur put broth into Pasteur put broth into several special several special S-shaped S-shaped flasksflasks
Each flask was Each flask was boiled and boiled and placed at various locationsplaced at various locations
44
Pasteur's Experiment - Pasteur's Experiment - Step Step 11
S-shaped FlaskS-shaped Flask
Filled withFilled with broth broth
The special shaped The special shaped flask was intended flask was intended to to trap any dust trap any dust particles containing particles containing bacteriabacteria
45
Pasteur's Experiment - Pasteur's Experiment - Step Step 22
FlasksFlasks boiledboiled
Microbes KilledMicrobes Killed
46
Pasteur's Experiment - Pasteur's Experiment - Step Step 33
Flask left at various Flask left at various locationslocations Did Did not turn cloudynot turn cloudyMicrobes not foundMicrobes not foundNotice the Notice the dustdust that that collected in the neckcollected in the neck of the flask of the flask
47
Pasteur's Experimental Pasteur's Experimental ResultsResults
48
Pasteur’s Pasteur’s S-shaped flask kept S-shaped flask kept microbes out but let air inmicrobes out but let air in..
Proved microbes only come from Proved microbes only come from other microbes (life from life) - other microbes (life from life) - biogenesisbiogenesis
The Theory of BiogenesisThe Theory of Biogenesis
Figure 1.3
49
ReviewReview
50
1668: 1668: Francisco RediFrancisco Redi filled six filled six jars with decaying meat.jars with decaying meat.
Evidence Pro and ConEvidence Pro and Con
Conditions:Conditions: Results:Results:3 jars covered with 3 jars covered with fine netfine net
No maggotsNo maggots
3 open jars3 open jars Maggots appearedMaggots appeared
From where did the maggots come?From where did the maggots come?
What was the purpose of the sealed jars?What was the purpose of the sealed jars?
SSpontaneous generation or biogenesis?pontaneous generation or biogenesis?
51
1745: 1745: John NeedhamJohn Needham put put boiled nutrient broth into boiled nutrient broth into covered flasks.covered flasks.
Evidence Pro and ConEvidence Pro and Con
Conditions:Conditions: Results:Results:Nutrient broth Nutrient broth heated, then heated, then placed in sealed placed in sealed flaskflask
Microbial growthMicrobial growth
From where did the microbes come?From where did the microbes come?
SSpontaneous generation or pontaneous generation or biogenesis?biogenesis?
52
1765: 1765: Lazzaro SpallanzaniLazzaro Spallanzani boiled boiled nutrient solutions in flasks.nutrient solutions in flasks.
Evidence Pro and Con
Conditions:Conditions: Results:Results:
Nutrient broth Nutrient broth placed in flask, placed in flask, heated, then heated, then sealedsealed
No microbial No microbial growthgrowth
SSpontaneous generation or pontaneous generation or biogenesis?biogenesis?
53
1861: 1861: Louis PasteurLouis Pasteur demonstrated that demonstrated that microorganisms are present in microorganisms are present in the air.the air.
Evidence Pro and ConEvidence Pro and Con
Conditions:Conditions: Results:Results:Nutrient broth Nutrient broth placed in flask, placed in flask, heated, not sealedheated, not sealed
Microbial growthMicrobial growth
Nutrient broth Nutrient broth placed in flask, placed in flask, heated, then sealedheated, then sealed
No microbial No microbial growthgrowth
SSpontaneous generation or biogenesis?pontaneous generation or biogenesis?
Early Earth
54
Age of the Earth
The Earth began as a collection of cosmic dust 4.5 billion years ago.Radiometric dating allows us to compare amounts of radioactive isotopes and their stable daughter products to determine ageA half-life is the time required for half a radioactive isotope to degrade.
Radioactive Decay
Early Organic Molecules
Oparin and Haldane suggested the primordial soup model.Miller-Urey conducted experiments to create organic molecules in the early atmosphere.The Bubble model suggests: gases were trapped in bubbles. Gases went through chemical reactions and released to atmosphere to react like Miller-Urey and fell into the ocean.
Miller-Urey Experiment
Lerman’s Bubble Model
60
Early Life on Earth
Protobionts
Aggregates of abiotically produced molecules.Exhibit some properties of life.
Ex: Osmosis, Electrical Charge, Fission
Protobionts
Protobiont Formation
Proteinoids + H2O microspheres
Liposomes + H2O lipid membranes
Coacervates
Colloidal droplets of proteins, nucleic acids and sugars surround by a water shell.Will form spontaneously from abiotically produced organic compounds.
Summary
Protobionts have membrane-like properties and are very similar to primitive cells.Start for selection process that lead to cells?
Question ?
Where did the energy come from to run these early cells?
Answer
ATP.Reduction of sulfur compounds.Fermentation.Rs and Ps developed much later.
Genetic Information
DNA RNA ProteinToo complex for early life.Other forms of genetic information?
RNA Hypothesis
RNA as early genetic information.
Rationale
RNA polymerizes easily.RNA can replicate itself.RNA can catalyze reactions including protein synthesis.
Ribozymes
RNA catalysts found in modern cells.e.g. ribosomes
Possible relic from early evolution?
Molecular Cooperation
Interaction between RNA and the proteins it made.Proteins formed may serve as RNA replication enzymes.
Molecular Cooperation
Works best inside a membrane.RNA benefits from the proteins it made.
Selection favored:
RNA/protein complexes inside membranes as they were the most likely to survive and reproduce.
DNA Developed later as the genetic information
Why? More stable than RNA
The hypothesis of spontaneous generation was used to explain
77
How new lif
e s...
How si
mple org...
How m
icrosp
her...
How euka
ryote
s...
25% 25%25%25%1. How new life
started2. How simple
organic molecules formed
3. How microspheres formed
4. How eukaryotes evolved
201 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Redi’s experiment was important because it showed that
78
Magg
ots giv
e r...
Flies s
warm on...
Flies d
o not f...
Air co
ntains a
...
25% 25%25%25%1. Maggots give rise
to microorganisms
2. Flies swarm on rotting meat
3. Flies do not form from rotting meat
4. Air contains a “vital force”
201 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
People objected to Spallanzani’s experiment because he
79
Use
d an open j...
Boiled his
fla...
Drew th
e necks..
.
Did not h
ave a...
25% 25%25%25%1. Used an open jar of meat as a control
2. Boiled his flasks of broth for a long time
3. Drew the necks of his flasks into a long shape
4. Did not have a control group 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
The neck of Pasteur’s flasks
80
Allowed both
a...
Allowed air b
u...
Allowed parti
c...
Kept both
air ...
25% 25%25%25%1. Allowed both air and particles to enter the flask
2. Allowed air but not particles in
3. Allowed particles in but not air
4. Kept both air and particles out
201 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
The oldest fossil of cellular life on Earth is
81
About 4.6 bill.
..
About 4.2 bill.
..
About 3.5 bill.
..
Less
than 2 bi...
25% 25%25%25%
1. About 4.6 billion years old
2. About 4.2 billion years old
3. About 3.5 billion years old
4. Less than 2 billion years old
201 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Coacervates and microspheres cannot evolve because they have no
82
Genetic i
nform
...
Cell membra
ne
Complex organi...
Fluid in
their.
..
25% 25%25%25%
1. Genetic information
2. Cell membrane3. Complex organic
molecules4. Fluid in their
interior
201 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Miller and Urey’s experiment
83
Proved O
parin’...
Disp
rove
d Opar..
.
Provided su
ppo...
Is ir
relevant ...
25% 25%25%25%1. Proved Oparin’s hypothesis about the origin of organic molecules
2. Disproved Oparin’s hypotheisi
3. Provided support for Oparin’s hypothesis
4. Is irrelevant to any hypothesis regarding the origin of life
201 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30