Objectives for the day:To:
• bring Local Authorities up to date with progress in key areas of development of the successor arrangements to CCGs and CLs for Living Expenses,
• help them prepare for implementation
• help them build their networks and share practice with other Authorities.
COMMUNITY CARE GRANTS AND CRISIS LOANS FOR
LIVING EXPENSES – SUCCESSOR
ARRANGEMENTS IN SCOTLAND
LOCAL GOVERNMENT EVENT
23 January 2013
Outline Timeline• April – Design Group discuss high level scheme.• May – Gather information and verify practicalities. • June to Sept – stakeholder events, consult on guidance,
EQIA, application form, monitoring, communications, training, liaison with IT suppliers, funding.
• Oct - political agreement and announcement of high level scheme.
• Oct to Dec - Finalise guidance, finalise and consult on application form, training materials, options appraisal for independent review. LG – planning for implementation.
• Jan to Mar ‘13– Set up, training, testing, communication.• April 1 2013 – Go live.• April onwards – Monitoring and evaluation, service
refinements, legislation for permanent arrangements.
Finance• Grant fund 23.8m (DWP) + 9.2m (SG)
• Set up Costs – now £2m
• Running costs – £5m falling to £4.6m. £150k retained centrally for quality improvement, monitoring and evaluation.
• Distribution of programme funding based on CCG and CL pattern of spend for 2011-12.
• Allocations letters after 25th (COSLA Leaders.
Guidance• No substantial change from 4 Dec version
anticipated. • Finalising financial management and
monitoring section. Developing Review section.
• Consistency check with other docs, examples given etc.
• Guidance - fairly static, decision makers guide – a living document
• Ready 5 February, formal issue 14 Feb.
Single application form
• Promote consistency/give service a national character
• Currently out for final comment (by 28 Jan)
• SG will print small un-badged supply
• LG will receive a file for printing locally and to inform telephone scripts (by 15 Feb)
• IT suppliers have the question set.
Monitoring and Evaluation• Data requirements and reports finalised
• IT suppliers have a full spec for the system
• Quantitative - Reporting by monthly upload
• Qualitative - Draft evaluation specification in place – considering resourcing
• Review data
• Regular dialogue between SG and LG
• Info will inform permanent arrangements
Training• National training programme to support
delivery and consistency – staff skills key
• Dates in place for Feb – 4 x 2 day course
• Train the trainer
• 2 places for each LA plus reserve places
• Provider is CPAG – extensive experience
• Draws on IRS and DWP materials
• Separate sessions on monitoring, review and financial management.
Review• Options considered thoroughly – paper on
Knowledge hub.
• Conclusion – most proportionate and appropriate solution is: 2nd Tier review in LAs, by a panel independent of decision making team.
• Group set up to develop guidance and resolve issues.
• Final guidance available a.s.a.p.
Key Dates• End Jan – settlement letters out• 5 Feb – Guidance and Decision Makers
Guide to LAs (formal issue 14 Feb)• 12 Feb - Section 30 Order made• 12/13,14/15, 19/20, 21/22 Feb - Training• 15 Feb - Communications texts and
application form to LAs • (tba) – specialist meetings – monitoring,
review, financial management.
Communications
• Communications Group in place, incl LA Reps, DWP, and CAS.
• Communications Strategy in place.
• Key Messages – in draft.
• Products – posters, leaflets and briefing notes.
Communications – local channels