Luc Van Ootegem & Elsy Verhofstadt Presentation at the conference “New directions in Welfare”
Oxford 29 June – 1 July 2009
© Luc Van Ootegem & Elsy Verhofstadt
Challenges for Direct Capabilities Measurement
1. Introduction
2. From triangle to questionnaire
3. Description of the samples
4. The meaning of primary data
5. Modelling of well-being
6. Conclusion
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 2
Structure
FunctioningsAchieved
Capabilities
Valuation
Non-welfarism
Consumption
Income or wealth
Happiness
Welfarism
Introduction
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 3
“Listing” = which functionings
and capabilities?
“Indexing” = how to valueand the weighting problem
Observability?
Challenges
FunctioningsAchieved
Capabilities
Valuation
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 4
Introduction
Secondary data-base research
FunctioningsAchieved
Capabilities
Valuation
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 5
Solution is data-driven: Re-interpretation of existing data and empirical results
Almost all empirical research
Introduction
Primary data-base research
FunctioningsAchieved
Capabilities
Valuation
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 6
Large potential to think about good questions
Introduction
Anand & van Hees, 2006 Anand et al., 2009
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 7
Two challenges
1. Real meaning of primary data– Functionings versus capabilities– Self-reporting versus valuation – Objective versus subjective functionings
2. Explanatory models– Life satisfaction – Functionings– Capabilities
1. Introduction
2. From triangle to questionnaire
3. Description of the samples
4. The meaning of primary data
5. Modelling of well-being
6. Conclusion
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 8
FunctioningsAchieved
Capabilities
Valuation
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 9
From triangle
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 10
To questionnaire
Level /Measurement Objective O Subjective S Valuation V
Capabilities Q OQ SQ VQ
Achieved Functionings B OB SB VB
Questionnaire-version All versions Version1 Version2
Version 3 and 4: Refined Functionings
General satisfaction: all versions
‘How satisfied are you with your life as a whole? Give a score from 1 to 10, where 1 indicates very unsatisfied and 10 very satisfied.’
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 11
Life domains
Life domain Realisation in the questionnaire SQ SB VQ VB
1 happy life 1 lead a happy life x x x x
2 reach dreams and goals in life x x
2a reach dreams in life x x
2b reach goals in life x x
3a be in good health x x x x
3b do sports x x x x
3c eat healthy food x x x x
4a have education and training x x x x
4b keep abreast of current events x x x x
4c participate in cultural events x x x x
5 social life 5 have a satisfying social life x x x x
6 environment 6 live in pleasant environments x x x x
7 personal integrity 7 act according to personal integrity x x x x
8 in general x x
2 achievement of dreams and goals
3 healthy life
4 education, information and culture
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 12
Subjective measurement and Valuation
Questions for life domain: ‘happy life’
− SQ: How are the possibilities for you … to seek happiness in your life − SB: Generally, I lead a happy life− VQ: I am satisfied with the possibilities…to seek happiness in my life − VB: I am satisfied with … the extent of happiness in my life
Scales− SQ: from 1 ‘completely unsatisfactory’ to 7 ‘excellent’ − SB/VQ/VB: from 1’completely disagree’ to 7 ‘completely agree’
Objective measurements Life domain Realisation in the questionnaire OB OQ
Smoking behaviour
Drinking behaviour
3a be in good health Number of doctor consults
3b do sports Hours playing sports x
Fruit consumption
Vegetable consumption
Hours spending on Internet
Hours watching TV
4a have education and training
4b keep abreast of current events Reading newspaper x
4c participate in cultural events Cultural activities x
Membership clubs (sports club, youth movement, student, cultural or political association)
x
Volunteer work x
Number of nights out
Direct social contacts
Indirect social contacts
Number of friends
Conversations with neighbours
Family visits
Place of residence
Live in centre of town
Garden
x
5 social life 5 have a satisfying social life
6 environment 6 live in pleasant environments
3 have a healthy life
3c eat healthy food
4 education, information and culture
4 acquire knowledge
3 healthy life
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 14
Examples
Life domain: ‘do sports’− SQ: How are the possibilities for you … to do sports − SB: I do sports sufficiently− VQ: I am satisfied with the possibilities…to do sports − VB: I am satisfied with … the sports I am doing
− OB: How many hours a week do you play sports?− OQ: You do this: (thick the most important reason)
at the insistence of others or pressed by the circumstances to find favour in someone’s eyes because you think it is important because it is fully in keeping with your belief and it fits your own
principles and values
1. Introduction
2. From triangle to questionnaire
3. Description of the samples
4. The meaning of primary data
5. Modelling of well-being
6. Conclusion
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 15
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 16
Goal, population, samples
Goal of research: primarily of a methodological nature
Population: First year Bachelor students in business economics at the University College Ghent
Samples:− Each version is tested with a different sample− 4 samples of about 120 students (483 in total)− Each sample is representative for the population
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 17
Socio-economic characteristics (SEC)
1. Personal characteristics: sex, relational position, number of siblings
2. Indicators of social background: educational level mother, situation parents, parental home, strictness parents
3. Variables related to student life: accommodated in student’s apartment, having a job while student, pay for studies
4. Capacity: hours of maths and final score in third stage secondary education, chance to pass
5. Personality: Big-five personality traits (extraversion, altruism, punctuality, emotional stability, creativity) + question refering to the mood
1. Introduction
2. From triangle to questionnaire
3. Description of the samples
4. The meaning of primary data
5. Modelling of well-being
6. Conclusion
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 18
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 19
Two challenges
1. Real meaning of primary data– Functionings versus capabilities– Self-reporting versus valuation– Objective versus subjective functionings
2. Explanatory models for– Life satisfaction – Functionings– Capabilities
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 20
Functionings vs capabilities
Life domain Realisation in the questionnaire Subjective measurement
Valuation
1 happy life 1 lead a happy life SB > SQ VB < VQ
2 achievement of dreams and goals
2 reach dreams and goals in life nsd VB < VQ
3a be in good health SB < SQ VB < VQ
3b do sports SB < SQ VB < VQ
3c eat healthy food SB < SQ VB < VQ
4a have education and training SB < SQ VB < VQ
4b keep abreast of current events SB < SQ VB < VQ
4c participate in cultural events SB < SQ VB < VQ
5 social life 5 have a satisfying social life SB < SQ nsd
6 environment 6 live in pleasant environments nsd nsd
7 personal integrity 7 act according to personal integrity SB > SQ nsd
3 healthy life
4 education, information and culture
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 21
Self-reporting vs valuation
Life domain Realisation in the questionnaire Functionings Capabilities
1 happy life 1 lead a happy life nsd nsd
2 reach dreams and goals in life nsd /
2a reach dreams in life / S < V
2b reach goals in life / S < V
3a be in good health nsd nsd
3b do sports nsd nsd
3c eat healthy food nsd S > V
4a have education and training S < V S > V
4b keep abreast of current events nsd nsd
4c participate in cultural events S < V nsd
5 social life 5 have a satisfying social life nsd nsd
6 environment 6 live in pleasant environments nsd nsd
7 personal integrity 7 act according to personal integrity nsd nsd
8 in general / nsd
2 achievement of dreams and goals
3 healthy life
4 education, information and culture
Objective and subjective measurements of functionings
Life domain Realisation in the questionnaire - SB
OB Correlation
3a be in good health Number of doctor consults -0.226**3b do sports Hours playing sports 0.603**
Fruit consumption 0.229**Vegetable consumption 0.304**
4a have education and training
4b keep abreast of current events Reading newspaper 0.378**
4c participate in cultural events Cultural activities 0.454**
Membership clubs a 0.167*
Volunteer work naNumber of nights out 0.260**Direct social contacts 0.296**Indirect social contacts 0.146Number of friends 0.328**Conversations with neighbours 0.085
Family visits -0.010
3 healthy life
3c eat healthy food
4 education, information and culture
5 social life 5 have a satisfying social life
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 23
The meaning of…
Respondents do not distinguish between subjective reporting and valuation (as being satisfied with)
The set of capabilities is perceived as larger than the achieved functionings
Subjective measurement of functionings correlates with objective measurements
1. Introduction
2. From triangle to questionnaire
3. Description of the samples
4. The meaning of primary data
5. Modelling of well-being
6. Conclusion
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 24
FunctioningsAchieved
Capabilities
Valuation
Three levels
Three equations
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 25
Well-being models
Y = f (X)
Life satisfaction FunctioningsCapabilities
SEC
Valuation
FunctioningAchieved
Capabilities
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 26
Well-being models
General satisfaction SB 1 lead a happy life 0,554
SB 2 reach dreams and goals in life 0,157SB 3a be in good health -0,019SB 3b do sports 0,095SB 3c eat healthy food -0,017SB 4a have education in line with capacity -0,326
SB 4b keep abreast of current events 0,058SB 4c participate in cultural events 0,111SB 5 have a satisfying social life 0,16SB 6 live in pleasant environments -0,137SB 7 act according to personal integrity -0,056not single 0,22parents divorced -0,351parental home rented -0,229a previous non-successful attempt to higher education -0,112chance to pass 0,022
extraversion 0,091emotionally concerned -0,081mood 0,121
Y = f (X)
Functionings CapabilitiesSEC
Valuation
FunctioningAchieved
Capabilities
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 28
Well-being models
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 29
Functionings
SB 1 SB 2 SB 3a SB 3b SB 3c SB 4a SB 4b SB 4c SB 5 SB 6 SB 7
SQ 1 lead a happy life 2,08 0,50 0,17 0,79 0,94 0,27 0,13 0,13 0,91 -0,08 0,39SQ 2a reach dreams in life 0,45 0,12 0,08 -0,30 -0,28 0,09 0,22 -0,36 0,49 0,21 0,32SQ 2b reach goals in life -0,47 0,40 0,56 -0,02 -0,31 -0,51 -0,37 -0,46 -0,58 0,20 -0,37SQ 3a be in good health -0,29 -0,09 -0,34 -0,51 -0,06 0,21 0,14 -0,34 -0,30 -0,50 0,23SQ 3b do sports 0,71 0,46 0,79 1,47 -0,10 0,08 -0,30 -0,21 -0,50 0,06 0,16SQ 3c eat healthy food 0,06 0,14 0,80 -0,07 0,78 0,01 0,12 0,53 0,36 0,16 0,06SQ 4a have education and training -0,34 -0,37 -0,09 -0,82 0,10 0,14 -0,15 -0,12 -0,43 0,27 -0,61SQ 4b keep abreast of current events 0,04 -0,08 -0,46 -0,11 -0,26 -0,26 1,10 -0,06 0,20 -0,37 -0,38SQ 4c participate in cultural events -0,14 -0,04 0,10 0,24 0,00 0,44 -0,08 0,48 0,08 0,03 0,18SQ 5 have a satisfying social life -0,33 0,12 -0,11 -0,66 -0,26 -0,77 -0,25 -0,41 1,85 -0,17 -0,30SQ 6 live in pleasant environments 0,54 -0,18 0,05 0,36 0,14 0,56 0,16 0,53 -0,05 0,75 0,44SQ 7 act according to personal integrity -0,74 0,13 0,26 -0,12 0,05 0,44 0,47 -0,10 -0,39 0,58 0,96
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 30
Functionings
SB 1 SB 2 SB 3a SB 3b SB 3c SB 4a SB 4b SB 4c SB 5 SB 6 SB 7
woman 0,18 0,03 -0,49 -1,85 -0,28 -1,48 -1,70 0,42 -0,78 0,07 -0,26not single 0,39 -0,33 0,59 0,05 -0,45 -0,26 0,02 -0,06 -0,43 0,67 0,16living in student's apartment 0,21 0,28 0,07 -0,12 -0,77 0,21 0,09 0,59 0,65 0,06 -0,06pay (partly) for studies 1,28 0,03 -0,68 1,02 0,55 -0,35 1,86 0,39 -0,15 0,51 -0,39number of siblings 0,28 -0,38 -0,22 -0,34 0,04 -0,17 0,46 0,03 0,06 -0,37 0,16no job while being a student 0,07 0,40 0,98 0,33 0,43 -0,10 -0,35 -0,02 -0,03 -0,20 0,21mother bachelor or master degree 0,70 0,14 -0,02 -0,34 -0,39 -0,84 -1,35 -0,09 -0,63 0,42 0,01parents divorced -0,64 0,39 1,47 -1,62 0,04 -0,39 -1,58 -1,26 -0,36 -1,12 0,45strictness parents 0,27 0,18 0,24 -0,22 0,02 -0,10 -0,41 -0,14 0,09 -0,07 0,22a previous non-successful attempt to HE -1,21 -3,00 -1,05 -1,45 -2,84 -0,61 0,26 -0,29 0,99 -0,27 0,70chance to pass 0,06 0,07 -0,01 0,05 0,07 0,07 0,02 -0,01 0,01 0,04 0,02extraversion -0,06 0,29 0,00 0,02 0,25 0,03 0,24 0,46 0,03 0,21 0,39less punctual 0,12 -0,03 0,23 -0,08 -0,20 -0,11 -0,03 -0,36 0,03 0,17 0,29emotionally concerned -0,10 -0,02 -0,33 -0,29 -0,16 0,02 0,01 0,06 0,08 -0,05 -0,26mood 0,29 0,26 0,09 -0,09 -0,53 0,28 0,37 0,88 -0,20 -0,04 -0,06
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 31
Comparing results…
Student specific variables (‘non-successful previous attempt to higher education’ and thinking to have a higher ‘chance to pass this year’) have an influence on some functionings, but only the ‘chance to pass’ has a direct effect on general life satisfaction.
General life satisfaction is not directly gender-related, but some functioning levels are.
The parental situation clearly influences some functioning levels while the impact on general satisfaction can only be
found on a lower significance level.
Y = f (X)
CapabilitiesSEC
Valuation
FunctioningAchieved
Capabilities
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 32
Well-being models
Capabilities
SQ 1 SQ 2a SQ 2b SQ 3b SQ 4b SQ 5 SQ 6 SQ 7 SQ 8
woman 1,02 1,06 0,33 -0,70 -0,74 0,39 0,45 0,52 0,70not single 1,25 -0,05 0,43 -0,01 -0,22 0,73 0,43 0,25 -0,17living in student's apartment -0,47 0,35 -0,28 -1,55 -1,71 -0,54 -0,50 -0,71 -0,39pay (partly) for studies -1,84 -0,36 0,62 0,16 0,77 -0,73 -1,15 -1,00 -0,69number of siblings -0,12 0,22 0,00 -0,23 -0,17 -0,08 0,10 -0,32 -0,02hours math in third stage sec. ed. -0,02 -0,43 -0,20 -0,10 -0,04 -0,34 -0,09 -0,32 0,13final score in third stage sec. ed. 0,06 0,34 0,36 -0,31 0,49 1,12 0,87 0,42 0,73
intensive study behaviour (sec. ed.) -0,58 0,03 -0,40 -1,47 -0,63 -0,96 -0,05 -0,77 -0,28no job while being a student -0,09 0,81 0,58 0,05 -0,42 0,25 0,55 0,55 0,27mother bachelor or master degree 0,84 -0,17 0,11 -0,57 0,45 0,63 0,31 0,87 0,04parents divorced 0,58 -0,97 -0,65 0,17 -0,05 -1,49 0,24 0,50 0,66parental home rented -0,80 -0,05 -0,53 -0,88 -1,50 -1,12 -2,37 -1,11 -1,79
strictness parents -0,21 -0,17 -0,04 -0,26 -0,20 -0,69 -0,61 -0,34 -0,52
a previous non-successful attempt to HE 0,06 -0,25 -0,75 0,31 -0,93 -0,13 -0,33 -0,89 -1,48
chance to pass 0,01 0,02 0,04 0,02 0,03 0,05 0,04 0,04 0,03extraversion 0,80 0,56 0,54 0,20 0,24 1,09 0,90 0,32 0,51
altruism -0,15 -0,25 -0,22 -0,15 0,09 -0,12 0,22 0,29 0,29less punctual 0,08 -0,11 -0,11 0,08 0,30 0,02 0,22 0,16 0,18emotionally concerned -0,25 -0,19 0,10 0,02 0,19 -0,26 -0,33 -0,06 -0,21creativity -0,25 0,14 -0,23 -0,36 -0,34 -0,32 -0,32 -0,15 -0,35mood 0,60 0,35 0,61 -0,24 -0,56 0,05 0,32 0,22 0,49
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 34
Comparing results…
Extraverted students have more life satisfaction, an effect that vanishes when controlling for functionings.
Extraversion has no direct influence on the more psychological functionings.
It is not extraversion as such that creates life satisfaction. Satisfaction originates from the indirect effect of extraversion via capabilities on (higher) functionings.
A similar reasoning holds for ‘mood’ and to a lower extent for ‘emotional stability’.
1. Introduction
2. From triangle to questionnaire
3. Description of the samples
4. The meaning of primary data
5. Modelling of well-being
6. Conclusion
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 35
Van Ootegem & Verhofstadt 36
Conclusion
Concrete questioning does make a difference.
Respondents do not make a significant difference (in most of the cases) between subjective reporting on and valuation of a functioning level or capability set.
The capability set is larger than the achieved functionings.
General life satisfaction is strongly influenced by (higher) reported functioning levels, and not by (higher) capabilities.
Achieved functionings are higher when the (reported) capabilities are higher.