52B09NE2009 2.26332 CONACHER 010
ASSESSMENT REPORT
ON THE
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
CONACHER TOWNSHIP
THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION ONTARIO
FOR
BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
G. Cavey, P.Geo.
Sept 3, 2003
RECEIVEDSEP 1 9 2003
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT _____OFFICE______
OREQUEST
l TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................iIntroduction..........................................................................................................................!Property Description, Location, Access and Physiography .................................................lHistory and Previous Work .................................................................................................3Geology...............................................................................................................................^
Regional Geology.....................................................................................................5Property Geology .....................................................................................................5Mineralization.........................................................................................................^
2003 Exploration ................................................................................................................,8Soil Geochemistry....................................................................................................8Rock Sampling.........................................................................................................9
Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................................12Qualifications - George Cavey, P.Geo...............................................................................14References..........................................................................................................................15
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure l Location Map Following Page lFigure 2 Claim Map Following Page lFigure 3 Regional Geology Following Page 5Figure 4 Property Geology Following Page 5Figure 5 Soil Geochemistry -Au Grid #1 Following Page 8Figure 6 Soil Geochemistry -Au Grid #4 Following Page 8Figure 7 Soil Geochemistry -Cu Grid #1 Following Page 9Figure 8 Soil Geochemistry -Cu Grid #4 Following Page 9
LIST OF TABLES
Table I Claim Status 2Table II 2003 Sample Summary 10Table in 1984 Noranda Main Zone Trench Assays 11Table IV Metallic Screen Analysis vs. Fire Assay 12
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix I 1999 Band-Ore Sample Results 18Appendix n iPL Analytical Results 20Appendix in iPL Procedures 25
INTRODUCTIONThis report presents a summary of recent geochemical work completed on of the
Shebandowan Property owned by Band-Ore Resources Ltd. It is prepared by Orequest Consultants Ltd. The information herein is derived from a review of the documents listed in the References and from information provided by Band-Ore. The field was competed between July 26-29, 2003.
The property is located west of Thunder Bay, Ontario (Figure 1), in the Matawin Gold Belt, a 75 km long, six kilometre wide geological structure that contains more than 75 gold occurrences. Gold mineralization shows a close spatial association between the Timiskaming type porphyry intrusives in contact with Archean greenstones.
The author of this report is familiar with the subject matter covering the preceding and intervening years and the current publicly available body of data. OreQuest Consultants has worked on a number of gold exploration properties in the Shebandowan area from 1983-1990. The author has written two technical reports in whole or in part for Band-Ore on the subject property hi 1993 and 1996.
All reference to currency in this report is in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. All historic gold assays from the Band-Ore property exploration programs from 1937-1990 were reported in ounces per ton (oz/ton) which have commonly been converted to grams per tonne (g/t) in this report. Technical reports from 1984-1990 contain analyses in both formats although all fire analyses were completed in grams per tonne (g/t).
At the time of the property visits, the Thunder Bay mineral records indicated that all the unpatented claims were in good standing although assessment work is required prior to Oct l, 2003 to keep them in good standing. The work to keep the claims in good standing was completed in Aug 2003 but has not yet been filed for assessment purposes. In addition, the land registry office has indicated that the patented claims and mineral lease where also in good standing.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, ACCESS AND PHYSIOGRAPHYThe property consists of 16 patented claims, one mining lease and 11 unpatented mining
claims, located in Conacher Township within the Thunder Bay Mining division (Figure 2).
A complete list of claim numbers and expiry dates is listed in Table I.
N
A
MONTREAL
Lake Ontario U.S.A.
OREQUESTO 100 200 300 400km BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Figure 1
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
LOCATION MAPOntario
NTS 52B/9
SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3
5390000
5 389 000 C
OREQUESTLower Shebandowan Lake
500 1000 1500
SCALE
Shebandowan Lake Management Plan (RAO)
BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Figure 2
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
CLAIM MAPOntario
NTS 52B/9
SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3
TABLE I; CLAIM STATUS
Claim NumberUnpatentedTB 11 87494TB 614741-614749TB964523
TotalPatentedTB533943TB 17221TB21966TB22147TB26533-535TB26547TB26539TB26953-954TB27924TB28019TB28089-092
Total
Acres
4036040
440*
41.9838.7935.9448.05111.8852.7137.6182.0330.6154.67
221.67755.94
No of Claims
191
11
1111311211417
Recording Date
Ol-Oct-0109-Nov-Sl10-Feb-87
Expiry Dates
Ol-Oct-0309-Nov-0310-Feb-05
LeasedPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatent
* - All Ontario unpatented claims are theoretically 40 acres (16 ha) in size, but in reality rarely are exactly 40 acres in size. Exact acreage is not known until the claims are legally surveyed.
The unpatented claims (11 claims) are currently in good standing as per the list in Table I. The unpatented Band-Ore claims are currently in good standing although 10 of the claims require assessment work prior to Oct l, 2003 and Nov 3, 2003 to keep them in good standing beyond their current expiry dates. The work to keep the claims in good standing was completed in July 2003 and summarized in this report. Upon approval of the assessment work, the 10 claims will be in good standing until Oct l, 2004 and Nov 3, 2004.
There are no known environmental liabilities either on the patented or unpatented claims which are the subject of this report. The author is not aware of any unusual permit requirements for the claims during the early exploration phases other standard permitting for any issues related to road bed improvements or stream bed crossings. Such permits are generally easily obtained. There are no known native land title issues in this area.
Parts of some of the claims lie within the "Shebandowan Lake Management Plan (SLMP)" which has been set up to '"balance the sustainable use of natural resources with the protection and enhancement of the natural ecosystems". The SLMP has been set up by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and applies to public lands such as crown land held in unpatented mineral claims. Portions of some of the unpatented claims will be affected by a "Restricted Area Order (RAO) which includes Shebandowan Lake and the immediate shoreline area for 300m inland of the lake. Exploration and mining are not affected but the normal permits related to streambeds will be required, for any work within the RAO. Portions of the No. 4 Zone and any extensions either west or
east of the zone may be within the RAO. The RAO does not apply to subsurface work. Figure 2 shows the extent of the RAO and indicates which portions of the claims lie within the RAO.
The Shebandowan property is located on the north shore of Shebandowan Lake, approximately two kilometres west of Shebandowan and 80 kilometres west of Thunder Bay, Ontario (Figure 1). Approximately 10 kilometers to the southwest of the property is Inco's recently shut down, Shebandowan Ni-Cu Mine.
The Trans Canada Highway (Highway 11) crosses the northern half of the property. Several bush roads branch off the highway providing access to both the cottage lots along the north shore of Shebandowan Lake and to most of the property. The property is also traversed by the C.N.R. railway and two transmission power lines. All essential services such as food and lodging are available in from the mining city of Thunder Bay including all heavy-duty equipment. Regular, daily scheduled airline companies including Air Canada, West Jet and Bearskin Airways service Thunder Bay.
Topography relief on the Shebandowan property is low and undulating with elevation not exceeding 100 feet. The Swamp River crosses the eastern half of the property and flows into Shebandowan Lake. Bedrock exposure is generally poor and glacial cover is abundant in places.
Vegetation on the property is typical of most areas of northwestern Ontario. Much of the property is covered by swamp with stunted black spruce, larch, alder, and labrador tea growing from thick mats of lichen and moss. As elevation increases and drainage improves larger black and white spruce, jack pine, birch and aspen are common. One and possibly two generations of timber have been cut from some portions of the property and there are recreational cottage lots along the north shore of Shebandowan Lake.
Precipitation for the region is low to moderate. Winters can be extremely cold (-30 to -40 degrees celsius), for periods of several weeks, but temperatures usually average -10 to -20 degrees celsius over the entire winter. Snow accumulations vary from year to year with 100 to 200 centimetres of accumulation being common especially in wooded areas. Shebandowan Lake can begin to freeze over in early December and break up in mid to late April. Summers are often hot and dry with temperatures often reaching the 250 C to 300 C range. Periodic heavy rain and thunderstorms are common during the summer months. Exploration can take place year round with minor breaks during the spring thaw and winter freeze up.
HISTORY AND PREVIOUS WORKGold was first discovered on the original Bandolac property in 1937. In 1939, the Rochon-
Maney Mining Syndicate sold the property to the Bandolac Mining Company.
The original showing, exposed in 11 trenches, consists of a zone 7.2 feet wide by 400 feet long over which channel sample assays averaged 0.247 oz/ton gold. In 1940, Bandolac Mining Company completed 500 feet of drilling in seven short holes on the East Zone. It is reported that the nine intersections encountered averaged 0.21 oz/ton gold over 5.5 feet (Crosscombe, 1947). In 1944, a total of 13,382 feet of drilling was completed in 30 holes on the East Zone. The historic reports do not state if samples collected over disclosed vein widths represent true widths. During this same year
Auband Mines Ltd. acquired the ground west of the Bandolac property and completed 10,121 feet of drilling in 19 holes on the West Zone (the western extension of Bandolac's East Zone). During the war years, the company announced, on a number of occasions, preparation for shaft sinking and underground work. There are no records in the assessment files to indicate that this work was actually completed likely due to the effects of World War n on manpower and other resources. In 1945, Freeport Exploration Company leased both the Bandolac and Auband properties and completed a self-potential survey over the porphyry that hosts the East and West Zones. In addition, Freeport completed 5,057 feet of drilling in seven holes.
In 1946, Band-Ore Gold Mines Limited was incorporated to take over Auband Mines Limited. Band-Ore Gold Mines completed 7,694 feet of drilling in 7 holes, and were successful in defining the East Zone gold bearing structure over a strike length of 4,800 feet. In the same year Band Ore Gold Mines Ltd. took over the property and assets of the Bandolac Mining Company Limited. The East and West Zones were now part of one property controlled by Band Ore Gold Mines Ltd. In 1947, a report was prepared for Band-Ore stating a tonnage estimate of 687,400 tons to the 500 foot level averaging 0.265 oz/ton gold (estimate not to the required standards of NI43- 101). This estimate was arrived at by combining the reserves of five separate zones named A to E, which represent the former East and West Zones and now combined, make up the present day Main Zone. The Main Zone has also been called the No. l Zone by certain authors, for the purposes of this report the zone will be referred to as the Main Zone. The drill logs have not been located for any of the 1944-46 drilling.
No significant work was reported to have occurred on the property from 1947 until 1974 with the exception of a small drill program completed in 1966. A Mr. John Anderson who drilled three holes (170m) from the shores of Shebandowan Lake completed the drill program. Anderson reported intersecting sections of well mineralized core but no assay results were contained in the assessment file. Bonnacord Explorations Ltd. optioned the property from Band-Ore in 1974 and conducted a bulk sampling program on the Main Zone in 1974, the results of which were subsequently lost.
On September l, 1980 Mattagami Lake Exploration optioned the Band-Ore property. In the fall of 1980, 50.9 kilometres of linecutting, VLF, magnetometer and I.P. surveys were completed. Seven drill holes (BO-80-1 to 7) totaling 1125.6 metres were drilled to verify the presence of the five auriferous zones A-E. The best intersections included 1.2 metres of 0.235 oz/ton gold (BO-80-2), and 1.63 metres of 0.133 oz/ton gold (BO-80-7), true widths are unknown. A selected number of intercepts from various drill programs on the Main Zone have been included in Appendix I. In addition to geological work and IP surveys, Mattagami completed a program of drilling. Based on the earlier 1940's Main Zone drilling, Watts, Griffis and McQuat, in 1980, estimated a reserve of approximately 705,000 tonnes grading 6.86 g/t gold above the 500 foot level.
During the fall of 1981 the No. 4 Zone was discovered by drilling some of the IP anomalies peripheral to the anomaly coincident with the Main Zone. The No.4 Zone lies approximately 800 metres southwest of the Main Zone and does not outcrop due to thick glacial till cover. During the summer of 1982 Mattagami completed 21 drill holes totaling 3512.2 metres on the No. 4 Zone (BO- 82 holes). The No. 4 Zone was tested over a strike length of 500 metres and to a vertical depth of 200 metres. The drilling determined that the zone consists of three sub-parallel zones referred to by
Mattagami as the Telluride, Upper and Lower Zones. Possible geological reserves for these three zones were calculated by Noranda to be approximately 616,000 tonnes of 4.83 g/t gold and 7.71 g/t silver. The western extension of the No. 4 Zone lies outside the present day claim block, although much of the defined mineralized material lies with the Band-Ore property.
From 1984 to 1990 Noranda trenched a portion of the Main Zone and several of the I.P. conductors on the property. During this period of time Noranda Exploration drilled 18 drill holes totaling 3,639 metres on both the No. 4 zone and the Main Zone. In 1991 Noranda transferred its interest to Hemlo Gold Mines. Hemlo Gold Mines terminated the option later that year and returned the property to Band-Ore Resources Ltd. Noranda spent approximately 51,100,000 between 1980- 1991 on the property.
hi 1995, Band-Ore completed a one hole (698 ft-212.75 meter) drill program on claim TB614747 in the central portion of the property. This hole was drilled to examine the stratigraphy in an area with little or no outcrop. The hole was designed to test the geological contact between intermediate to mafic volcanics and the felsic to intermediate tuffs which host the No. 4 Zone approximately one kilometre to the west. The hole, S-95-1, intersected 318.5 ft (97 meters) of intermediate to mafic tuffs predominately consisting of ash to lapilli tuffs. The tuffs are in contact with a 163.2 ft (47.7 meter) thick agglomerate unit, which in turn is in contact with a 69.3 ft (21.1 meter) felsic tuff, a part of the felsic -intermediate volcanic unit. The hole did determine that the favorable horizon existed at depth but was unsuccessful in discovering any new mineralization in this area. No gold analysis higher than 0.01 oz/ton were detected.
Band-Ore also completed a prospecting, sampling program in the fall of 2000 over the area of the Main Zone. Further detail of this work is contained in the "Exploration" section of this report.
GEOLOGY Regional Geology
The Shebandowan Lakes area contains east trending mafic to intermediate metavolcanics consisting of basalt, andesite, and dacite flows and tuffs with minor felsic volcaniclastics and metasediments underlies the Shebandowan Lake area. Gabbro, peridotite and feldspar (+A- quartz) porphyry sills and plugs (Figure 3) intrude the metavolcanics. Mafic intrusives referred to as gabbro and peridotite by Mattagami have been described as meta-diabase by Chorlton. A large quartz diorite stock underlies Lower Shebandowan Lake.
In 1994 government geologists first coined the term "Matawin Gold Belt (MGB)" to describe the 75 km long, six kilometre wide geological structure that contains more than 75 gold occurrences including the Band-Ore occurrences. Gold mineralization in the MGB shows a close spatial association between the Timiskaming type alkalic metavolcanics and intrusives and intrusives in contact with Archean greenstones and metasedimentary units.
Property GeologyThe property is underlain mainly by intermediate to mafic metavolcanic rocks with lesser
felsic volcaniclastic rocks, gabbro and feldspar porphyry sills (Figure 4). The metavolcanic sequence
QueticoMetasedimentary
Superbelt
N
Northerniaht Gneiss
TerrainLEGEND
B Gold Occurrence
Metasediments and Pyroclastic Rocks
Gabbro, Anorthosite
Late to Post-Tectonic Plutons
Mafic, Ultramafic Metevolcanics; Locally Intrusive Bodies
Felsic Metavolcanics; Altered Fissile Metavolcanics of Mafic- Intermediate Composition
OREQUEST
Oe e
Fault
Pistol Lake
Inco-Shebandowan Mine
Narrows
Ol
10kml adapted from
Stott and Schnieders, 1983
BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Figure 3
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
REGIONAL GEOLOGYOntario
NTS 52B/9
SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3
5 391 000 N
Shebandowan Lake Management Plan (RAO)
after Band-Ore; Duess 2000
OREQUESTBAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Figure 4
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
PROPERTY GEOLOGYOntario
NTS 52B/9
SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3
is in contact with the Shebandowan Lake quartz diorite stock, which lies south of the property."
Metavolcanic rocks on the property are east west trending and dip steeply to the north.
The intermediate to mafic metavolcanics consists of andesite and dacite flows, tuffs, breccias
and agglomerates. A barren iron formation interbedded with dacitic flows is reported in the 1980
drilling. The felsic metavolcanic rocks are comprised of serialized and pyritized rhyolite tuffs and
felsic fragmentals. The No. 4 Zone is hosted within a quartz-carbonate veined shear zone within
sheared felsic volcanics in the southern half of the property.
Felsic intrusives on the property include an outcrop of syenite approximately 300 metres
north of Blizzard Bay and the feldspar porphyry sill, which hosts the Main Zone. The feldspar
porphyry has been intensely sheared locally, where it appears as a sericite schist with no apparent
phenocryst phase and a higher than average pyrite concentration. Mafic intrusives on the property
are mainly gabbroic sills with some peridotite noted. Contacts with the hosting metavolcanics are
conformable, chloritized and sharp.
The metavolcanics underlying the property lie on the north limb of a large isoclinal anticline.
Top determinations from pillowed flows in the general area indicates that the sequence is north
facing (Huska, 1981). Three north trending faults are noted on the property, two of these east of the
Swamp River have displaced gabbro sills as much as 100 metres on surface. The intensity of
schistosity within the metavolcanics and porphyry is variable and for the most part east-west striking
and sub-vertical. Sinistral shearing within the feldspar porphyry unit is most intense along trends
parallel with local well developed schistosity. Foliation and fracture patterns observed on the
property are likely associated with the emplacement of the Shebandowan Lake quartz diorite stock.
MineralizationTwo distinct types of mineral occurrences have been identified on the Band-Ore property.
The Main Zone (No. l Zone), discovered in 1937, consists of sheared and altered porphyry with
disseminated and stringer pyrite mineralization. The No. 4 Zone consists of blue-grey quartz veining
hosted in sheared and altered felsic to intermediate pyroclastics. The host rocks consist of
intermediate to mafic metavolcanics are mainly comprised of well-foliated andesite and dacite flows,
tuffs, breccias and agglomerates. To the north of this sequence lies the Postan Fault which marks the
contact between the metavolcanics and the northern metasedimentary Quetico subprovince. To the
south of the property is the Mabella Fault and associated Timiskaming-type sediments. Gold
mineralization in the area is associated with sulphide bearing veins and pyritic stringers in sheared
metavolcanic rocks and sheared felsic porphyry sills and plugs.
Pyrite occurs as fine disseminations and massive pods within mafic breccias and
agglomerates. Noranda reported that their highest assay from this type of occurrence was 0.013
oz/ton gold, 0.15 oz/ton silver, and Q.04% copper. Trenching of an LP. anomaly approximately 300
metres northeast of the Main Zone, within a sheared sericitic/chloritic intermediate to mafic
metavolcanic, returned a result of 0.16 oz/ton gold across two metres (true width unknown). There
is no further description of this showing, however the showing seems to indicate the presence of
significant gold mineralization within the intermediate to mafic metavolcanics. In 1989 a total of 15
trenches were excavated to test I.P. anomalies outside the drilled areas. Most of the trenches
exposed sericite-chlorite schists; the best assay returned was 0.214 oz/ton gold from a grab sample
although many of the samples returned lower grades.
Disseminated pyrite and pyritic lenses occur within the sheared and altered feldspar porphyry
in the Main (No.l) Zone. Concentrations of disseminated pyrite are higher in sericitized zones (1-
20/*)) in semi-massive discontinuous lenses. Sampling of drill core indicates that gold values greater
than 0.1 oz/ton occur only within seriticized zones with appreciable amounts of pyrite (Huska, 1981).
In 1984 Noranda Exploration stripped the Main Zone exposing an area 120 metres by 10 metres.
Noranda collected 107 diamond saw cut channel samples from the exposed outcrop, only eight
samples returned values greater than 0.08 oz/ton Au. The highest values were 0.56 and 0.74 oz/ton
Au. Sample widths were typically 0.50m, but final trench maps are missing from the assessment
records so the actual sample widths and locations are not known. Noranda felt that because of the
lack of continuity in mineralization on surface and in previous drilling, no further work would be
required (Bellinger, 1992).
The most abundant sulphide noted from surface work by Mattagami and Noranda was pyrite,
minor chalcopyrite associated with quartz veining was noted in drilling by Noranda. Clayton (1980)
reports the occurrence of sphalerite and chalcopyrite within rusty shear zones. The highest base
metal assay, reported from historic work on the property is from a grab sample which assayed Q.3%
copper and 4.4*^ zinc (Crosscombe, 1947). Base metals were not routinely tested by any of the past
explorationists so the 1947 assays cannot be considered indicative of base metal mineralization on
the property. The highest precious metal results came from a grab sample, which returned a value of
15.7 oz/ton gold and 43.6 oz/ton silver. Precious metal values of this magnitude are not considered
indicative of the mineralization at the Main Zone; assays do not normally exceed 1.0 oz/ton Au or
Ag. Channel samples from the original trenches collected in 1947 on the Main Zone averaged 0.35
oz/ton gold over a true width of 7 feet and a strike length of 400 feet (Crosscombe, 1947). Locations
for these samples were reportedly "imprecise at best; in some cases locations are not given"
(Clayton, 1980).
No. 4 Zone gold mineralization occurs in structurally controlled quartz veins; quartz flooded
zones and silicified pyritic tuffs. All mineralized zones exhibit some degree of silicification, quartz
veining or quartz stockwork and are associated with disseminated pyrite. Ankerite alteration is
abundant and forms a broad halo around the gold bearing zones. Fine-grained specks of tourmaline
are common in the No.4 Zone, but it does not show preferential association with the gold
mineralization. The No. 4 Zone is comprised of three sub-zones termed the Telluride, Upper and
Lower Zones, and is hosted by sheared and altered felsic to intermediate pyroclastics. All three of the
mineralized zones are associated with quartz veins including:
a) hydrothermal veins- beige to creamy white, competent containing banded pyrite mineralization, generally low silver and gold values.
b) Bluish grey to grey pyritiferous veins- grey in colour, competent, generally contains the
best gold values.c) Light greenish-grey veins- not common, competent and carry good gold values.d) White quartz veins- weakly mineralized, narrow ^lcm in width) and contain good values
8
2003 EXPLORATIONMost of the previous exploration work completed on the property was done from 1937-90
and has been discussed hi the "History" section of this report. The only recent work completed on the property was a lone diamond drill hole in 1995 in the southeast corner of the property followed by a trench sampling program completed in the fall of 1999 (Duess 2000). Both of these programs were conducted by Band-Ore and were assessment work to maintain tenure of the unpatented claims. Band-Ore collected 119 grab samples from old pre-existing trenches excavated by Noranda from their work in the 80's located on and around the Main Zone. In addition, the company collected another 45 prospecting rock grab samples from various locations within the claim block.
Many of the old trenches contain visible diamond saw cuts, presumably the result of Noranda collecting channel samples. The authors have been unable to find maps relating individual samples to specific sample cuts in the trenches. Of the 164 samples collected by Band-Ore in 1999, 26 returned values above l gram per tonne. The highest result was 32.2 g/t Au with most samples containing only trace values of gold. Most of the higher-grade samples came from Trenches "A", "B" or "D". A complete list of the 2000 Duess sample results from Trenches A, B, and D can be located in Appendix I.
The 1995 drill core is the only core on the property that is intact and labelled however no significant mineralization was intersected in this hole. The grab samples collected from the trenches in 1999 were successful in establishing the presence of gold within small pyritic lenses within the sheared feldspar porphyry of the main zone.
Soil GeochemistryNoranda using the standard technique of collecting a "B" horizon sample approximately 15-
20cm below the surface completed previous soil sampling surveys. The Noranda surveys found that typically that copper geochemical anomalies were located along road or old trails so felt that these results were likely contaminated. Noranda concluded:
"Difficulties in obtaining a consistent sample and soil contamination would appear to be contributing factors resulting in the ineffectiveness of this survey. A more effective geochemical technique may involve basal till sampling where the effects of topography and soil contamination would be minimal".
In 2003, in an attempt to determine if a different approach to soil geochemistry could be used to examine the many IP anomalies on the property, Band-Ore decided to complete two soil profile test grids over the Main and No.4 Zones. Five lines, 100 m in length and 100m apart were placed over each zone of interest, al total of 0.5km of lines per grid. Three pits where dug at 50m spacing along each line with a sample collected at approximately 30cm depth and a second sample collected at 60cm depth. The pits were completed using a combination of grub hoes, metal pry bars and hand gardening trowels. A total of 14 sample sites were completed on the Main Zone (Figures 5 and 7) and 15 sites over the No.4 Zone sample (Figures 6 and 8), all sample sites were located with a compass and hipchain and were recorded with a OPS.
1L1+OOE 1L2+OOE 1L3+OOE 1L4+OOE 1L5+OOE
100N
SON
LO+00, <2 1289,163 l
SOS4^2
100S<2, 2
<2,4
2,12
<2
L , <2
<2
, <2
<2,317
<2,34
OREQUEST
A sample Au ppb, B sample Au ppb
BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Figure 5
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Au GRID #1
Ontario NTS 52B/9
SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3
.. ...V ..; ^ ,'* O***j , "r V-* ;^
4LO+OOE 4L1+OOE 4L2+OOE 4L3+OOE 4L4+OOE
100N
SON. <2
LO+00, <2
<2'
, <2
SOS^^2,10 ( ^2,
100S
150S
, <2
A sample Au ppb, B sample Au ppb
1^2 L2. <2
(l, <2
l-
OREQUESTBAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Figure 6
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Au GRID #4
Ontario NTS 52B/9
SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3
In general, samples collected at the 15-30 cm depth consisted of uniform coloured, orange- brown to brown, soil. A marked difference exists from the samples collected at the 50-60cm depth. Samples were orange-brown to brown or grey- brown and much coarser often containing abundant sand. Samples were collected in kraft paper sample bags labelled and sent to iPL Labs in Vancouver for ICP analysis, (Au with an AA finish). The 30 cm sample was collected from the "B" horizon, while it appeared that the 60cm depth encountered a transitional horizon between the "B" and "C" horizon. Full details on the analytical procedures used by iPL Labs have been included in Appendix III of this report.
Two of the planned sample sites over the Main Zone, Grid l, were located in swamps so no sample was collected at the predetermined site. Instead, samples were collected as close to the planned site as possible and were numbered accordingly. These sites were, Line 4E, Station 0+80S and Line 5E, Station 0+85S. All other sample collected from sites from both grids were dry, water was not a problem. Regionally, the terrain in the area of the No.4 Zone tends to contain abundant swamps or wet ground, which may hamper future sampling over a broader area centred on the No.4 Zone. The Main Zone sits on a prominent ridge, likely due to the siliceous component of the underling porphyry. Samples site located over the Main Zone porphyry were fairly easy to obtain, but as the sampling proceeded to the south, the wet ground surrounding the No.4 Zone was encountered which made the soil sampling more difficult.
In summary, results of the 2003 soil sampling indicated that of the 29 sites where two samples were collected from the two different depths 21 sites contained no detectable gold values (Figures 5 and 6). Five of the sites contained increases in gold values from the deeper sample, while three sites showed the sample collected from the upper sample returning a higher value than the deeper sample. Statistical analysis to determine background and anomalous values for the limited database was not completed since the database was too small to provide any meaningful statistical conclusions. Further sampling over a broader area and further sampling at greater depths (^ 1m) should be considered to determine if soil sampling at depth can assist in locating areas of gold mineralization.
In all cases, the copper values were higher at depth than from the shallower sample (Figures 7 and 8). The increase in copper values at depth could also be attributed to possible surface contamination due to effects of the nearby Inco Shebandowan Cu-Ni mine. Nickel values were less consistent. No detailed testing has been completed by any Ontario government department to determine if the area shows an increase in copper in the soils due to the effect of the mine. No additional testing for copper or nickel in any future soil sampling is recommended.
Rock SamplingA number of rock samples from the property in order to verify some of the historic data. It
was decided that sampling of some of the structures exposed in the trenches would verify the existence of gold in the structures. Sample sites were selected based on the best grab sample locations of Band-Ore (from trenches located on Figure 4), all from the Main Zone. Table n summarizes the samples in July 2003.
1L1+OOE 1L2+OOE 1L3+OOE 1L4+OOE 1L5+OOE
100N
SON
LO+0029, 53
SOS15,21
100S32,33
i 39,54 123,25 127,34 L27, 33
33,44
28,44
29,81
25,85
12,22
169,263
20,30
21,31
OREQUEST
A sample Cu ppm, B sample Cu ppm
BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Figure 7
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Cu GRID #1
Ontario NTS 52B/9
SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3
4LO+OOE 4L1+OOE 4L2+OOE 4L3+OOE 4L4+OOE
100N
SON
LO+00
, 36
, 30
100S
150S
70,139
61,101 l 36. 39 l 12,52
20,31 40,39 120,31 40,39 16,31 28,63
t
l28,43
OREQUEST
A sample Cu ppm, B sample Cu ppm
BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Figure 8
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Cu GRID #4
Ontario NTS 52B/9
SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3
10
TABLE II -2003 SAMPLE SUMMARY
Tag Number
88515
88516
88518
88519
88521
88522
Sample Length
1 metre
1 metre
1 metre
1.4 metre
1 metre
0.5 metre
Band-Ore Trench
A
A
A
D
B
Assay (R/t)
0.33 Au 1.0 Ag
10.65 Au
30.5 Ag
5.26 Au 11.2Ag
2.77 Au 9.2 Ag1.63 Au4.2 Ag0.04 Au 0.4 Ag
Sample Description
Chip sample along Noranda saw cut east end of trench A near Duess sample 40 1 54, consists of feldspar porphyry containing 1 cm shear containing pyrite striking 090 degrees.
Chip sample near middle of trench A near Duess sample 40156, consists of feldspar porphyry containing 5cm vertical shear containing massive pyrite striking 070 degrees.
Chip sample near west end of trench A near Duess sample 40172 consists of feldspar porphyry containing two 5cm vertical shear containing pyrite striking 070 degrees. Sample oriented about 040 degrees
Chip sample across sericite altered shear in porphyry containing abundant pyrite and includes Duess samples 7481 through 7487
Chip sample oriented 000 degrees across very sheared porphyry with rusty sericite near Duess 40187
Pieces of split core from one box at zone 4 dump, very rusty sericite sheared material possibly intermediate volcanics. Hole number and depth unknown.
These rock samples were taken to verify the existence of mineralization, with resultant analytical results being similar to the historic resources mentioned previously in this report. These samples do nothing to verify the tonnage and given the state of the core storage on the property it will be necessary to twin some of the past holes to verify the intersections. The actual location of the old holes may be difficult to determine as only two drill collars were found in the No.4 Zone area and none were seen in the Main Zone. More time in the field may reveal additional hole collars but confirmation of the historic resources will take a substantial amount of work.
Samples 88516 and 88518 were taken across the same shear about 20 meters apart. The shear continued both east and west of the samples but was not continuous throughout Trench A. The average of the two samples is 7.96 g/t Au. There is the possibility that numerous en echelon style mineralized lenses are present within the boundaries of the shear zones causing apparent discontinuity in trenches compared to that seen in the drilling.
All of the rock samples were subject to fire assay with AA finish and 30 element ICP. The results are shown in Appendix II and the iPL analytical procedures are shown in Appendix HI.
In the above samples silver appears to occur with gold in a three to one ratio. Copper values are generally less than 100 ppm. There is one elevated zinc value over G.1% in sample 88521 which also contained 2.7 ppm cadmium (other samples were below detection limit in cadmium). There are no significant quantities of mercury, antimony or arsenic in any of the samples with all results below detection limits.
Most of the historic samples discussed in this report were taken either in the 1980's by Noranda or their wholly owned subsidiary Mattagami Lake Exploration Company Ltd. Noranda used standard techniques for that time, ICP with AA finish for gold analysis and fire assay for core
11
samples. Full details of all the sampling methods and assaying procedures are not available to the authors and this is not uncommon for work in these eras. Some of the old reports contain attached assay certificates, which provide some analytical information. For example, Noranda collected 107 channel samples from the Main Zone trench in 1984. Noranda sent the samples to "Warnock Mersey Professional Services" in Winnipeg for analysis. Warnock analyzed the samples using the one assay ton fire assay method. Seventeen of the samples were sent to "Custom Fire Assaying Ltd." in Cochenour, Ontario for checks although the report contains the results, there is no discussion of the analytical procedures. The following table indicates that Noranda was aware of reproducibility problems with the gold on the Band-Ore property:
TABLE III - 1984 NORANDA MAIN ZONE TRENCH ASSAYS
Sample No1197211973119741197511976119771199011992119931199411995120141201512016120211202212023
Laboratory (all analyses in oz/ton Au)Warnock Mersey
0.030.560.740.020.130.04
Trace0.210.040.01
TraceTrace0.11
Trace0.010.210.01
Custom Fire Assaying0.020.010.260.010.080.04
Trace0.2
0.04TraceTraceTrace0.060.040.020.260.02
Noranda routinely used a 30-gram fire assay technique for gold analysis. Gold values range from 0.01 g/t to samples approaching 34 g/t. Coarse gold may be contributing to the erratic nature of the Noranda results. There is no detailed discussion of abundant visible gold noted but with values of nearly one oz/ton, coarse gold may be a problem, hi 2003, two samples were collect and analyzed with the metallic screen analysis method. In the case of the samples collected, there was not appreciable difference between a conventional fire assay and the metallic screen analysis. The following table summarizes the results of the two samples using the two analytical methods:
12
TABLE IV -METALLIC SCREEN ANALYSIS VS FIRE ASSAY (2003)
Sample Total weight +150M -1SOM Number (grams) (grams) (grams)88517 88520
975.96 1123.2
13.88 962.08 49.96 1073.24
Au+150 Au 150 Metallic Screen Fire Assay g/t g/t Au Total (g/t) Au (g/t)149.55
16.931.05
8.8532.73
9.2133.3
9.7
Certain Noranda drill holes also indicated problems with reproducibility. Noranda used two labs for much of the drill core analysis, a facility in Pamour Ontario and Swastika Laboratories located in Swastika Ontario. Similar swings in assay values between the two labs were also noted from the drilling. Some metallic screen analysis was completed on certain holes and although the reports did not provide the breakdown of the gold distribution between the coarse and fine fractions, the metallic analyses likely provided an indication of the contained gold. Metallic screen analysis should be considered on core and selected trenches to attempt to reduce the effects of irregular distribution of gold in the samples as noted by Noranda.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSThe Shebandowan Property of Band-Ore Resources Ltd. is located along the north shore of
Shebandowan Lake, approximately two kilometers west of the village of Shebandowan, and approximately 80 kilometers west of Thunder Bay. The property lies within the Matawin Gold Belt, a 75 km long, six kilometre wide geological structure that contains more than 75 gold occurrences. Gold mineralization in the Belt shows a close spatial association between the Timiskaming type porphyry intrusives in contact with Archean greenstones.
In 1944-46 drilling outlined a mineralized body named the Main Zone. In 1980, based on the earlier 1940's Main Zone drilling, Watts, Griffis and McQuat, estimated a reserve of approximately 705,000 tonnes grading 6.86 g/t gold above the 500 foot level.
hi 1980 Mattagami Lake Exploration optioned the property and discovered the No.4 Zone mineralized body by drilling IP anomalies. The No. 4 Zone was tested over a strike length of 500 metres and to a vertical depth of 200 metres. Possible geological reserves for these three zones were calculated by Noranda to be approximately 616,000 tonnes of 4.83 g/t gold and 7.71 g/t silver.
To date much work has been performed on the property. A systematic program of drill testing I.P. anomalies was initiated by Mattagami and later carried on by Noranda but never completed. Since a great deal of ground geophysical surveys and geological mapping have already been conducted on the property, the majority of the proposed exploration program will be drill intensive focusing on targets defined by the existing data base. The passing of time has not been friendly to the database. Core is unavailable for re-logging or re-assaying and it may be difficult to orient the previous drill data on the ground.
The two known zones on the property will need to be verified at least in part while other anomalies are investigated. As the recently defined Matawin Gold Belt is more actively explored on other properties, new ideas for exploration targets may present themselves in addition to those already defined by previous operators.
13
After evaluation of the geochemical, geophysical and geological data, many questions regarding the potential of the property remain unanswered. It is recommended that an exploration program of follow up diamond drilling be initiated to test I.P. anomalies beyond the limits of the previous drilling. These areas would include testing the felsic porphyry west of and along strike of the Main zone as well as untested I.P. anomalies within the metavolcanic rocks adjacent to the felsic porphyry. Further sampling over a broader area and further sampling at greater depths ^ 1m) should be considered to determine if soil sampling at depth can assist in locating areas of gold mineralization.
No further work is recommended on the No. 4 Zone at this time. The work program recommended in this report refers to the Main Zone mineralization and possible extensions thereof. The dominant control on mineralization appears to be structural and further drill testing of the porphyry should focus on intersections of structural features oblique to the dominant east trending shearing within the Main Zone porphyry.
The success of I.P. surveys on the property seems to be substantiated by the I.P. targets drilled to date that contains auriferous mineralization. However, many of the I.P. anomalies remain untested. Approximately 1,500 metres of the feldspar porphyry unit west of the Main Zone remains untested by drilling. Coinciding with the western trend of the feldspar porphyry are two I.P. anomalies that are extensions of the anomaly overlying the Main Zone. Due to the absence of outcrop in this area it is recommended that this area be a high priority target for drilling.
Since the Main Zone mineralization has not been tested below the 500 foot level it is recommended that a portion of the proposed drilling test the down dip potential of the Main Zone. Additional holes are recommended to twin several of the old 1944-46 holes to understand the basis of the historic estimates.
14
QUALIFICATIONS
I, George Cavey, of 306-595 Howe Street, Vancouver British Columbia, hereby certify:
1. I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia (1976) and hold a B.Sc. degree in geology.2. I am presently employed as a consulting geologist with OreQuest Consultants Ltd. of #306-595
Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia.3. I have been employed in my profession by various mining companies since graduation, with
OreQuest Consultants Ltd. since 1982.4. I am a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British
Columbia, and have been registered since 1992.1 am also a member of the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta and the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Manitoba.
5. I am responsible for preparation of all sections of this report utilizing data summarized in the References section of this report.
6. I most recently visited the subject property on July 26,27 and 29th, 2003.7. I have had no recent direct involvement with the Band-Ore, Shebandowan property since I co-
authored two reports for Band-Ore in 1993 and 1996 on the same subject property covered in by this report. I last visited the property in 1985.
8. I have been the author or co-author of an number of technical reports dedicated to exploration in the Band-Ore Shebandowan area including two reports written for Band-Ore Resources between 1993 and 1996 on the same property that is the subject of this report.
9. I am independent of Band-Ore Resources Ltd.10.1 consent to the use of this report for the purpose of filing assessment work on the Band-Ore
Shebandowan property.
George Cavey, P.Geo.
DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 3rd day of Sept, 2003.
15
REFERENCESAGAR,G.1984: Band-Ore Evaluation - Progress Report #1, Inco Metals Company June 25,1984CHORLTON, L.1987: Geological Setting of Gold Mineralization in the Western Part of the Shebandowan
Greenstone Belt, District of Thunder Bay, Northwestern Ont; Ontario Geological Survey,Open File Report 5636.
CALVERT, D and CLARK, J.1999: Dan Calvert 1998 OPAP Program, Conacher Property, Conacher Township Jan, 1999 CALVERT SR, D and CALVERT JR, D.2000: 1999 OPAP Report, Conacher Property, Conacher Township Jan, 2000 CAVEY, G. and TURNBULL, D 1993: Report on the Shebandowan Property, Conacher Township for Band-Ore Resources Ltd.,
May 3,1993. CAVEY, G.1996: Letter to Band-Ore dated July 10,1996. CLAYTON, R.H. 1980: Summary Report for the Shebandowan Property of Band-Ore Resources Ltd., Watts, Griffis,
and McQuat Ltd., Toronto, June 6, 1980. CLAYTON, R.H. 1980: Report on the Shebandowan Property of Band-Ore Resources Ltd., Watts, Griffis, and
McQuat Ltd., Toronto, July 10, 1980. CLAYTON, R.H. 1984: Summary of Recent Work by Mattagami Lake Exploration on the Conacher Township
Claims of Band-Ore Resources Ltd., Watts, Griffis, and McQuat Ltd., July 20, 1984. CROSSCOMBE, J.S. 1947: Report on the Property of Band Ore Gold Mines Limited, Thunder Bay Mining Division,
Ontario, May 15, 1947. DUESS, R.1992: Summary Report for the Shebandowan Property of Band-Ore Resources Ltd. DUESS, R.2000: Geological Report for the Shebandowan Property, Band-Ore Resources Ltd. Jan 5, 2000. GREEN ICE INC.2003: News Release dated July 29,2003. HATCH, H.B.1946: Report on the Property of the Band Ore Gold Mines Limited; Shebandowan, Ont, April 1946. LAVIGNE, M. AND SCOTT, J. 1994: Report of Activities, 1993, Resident Geologist Program, Thunder Bay South Regional
Resident Geologist Report, Ontario Geological Survey Open File #5892 LAROUCHE C., LICHTBLAU, A 1995: Evaluation of Previous Exploration Work and the Potential for Gold Exploration, Conacher-
Hagy Properties for Landore Explorations Inc., Nov 30, 1995. MORIN, J.A. 1973: Geology of the Lower Shebandowan Lake Area, District of Thunder Bay, ODN Geological
Report #11O
16 V .v l '- ^vv! . : '-' '-" "
O'CONNER, A.1997: Report on Diamond Drilling, Shebandowan Project- Moose Calf Property, Shebandowan,
Ont, Green Ice Corporation, Feb 23, 1997. O'CONNER, A. 1997: Report on Diamond Drilling, Shebandowan Project- Narrows Property, Shebandowan, Ont,
Green Ice Corporation, April 1997. ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1991: Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Magnetic Survey, Shebandowan Area Map
81575 scale 1:20,000. OSAMANI, I.1997: Greenwater Lake Area , West Central Shebandowan, Greenstone Belt OGS Open File 296. SCHNIEDERS, B.R, SCOTT, J., SMYK, M. and O'BRIEN, M. 2003: Report of Activities, 2002, Resident Geologist Program, Thunder Bay South Regional
Resident Geologist Report, Ontario Geological Survey Open File #6112 STOTT, G.M., SCHNIEDERS, B.R.1983: The Geology of Gold in Ontario, A.C. Colvine; OGS Misc. Paper 110, Toronto, 1983. WITTE, M. 1981: Heap Leaching Metallurgical Studies on Several Ontario Gold Ores, Ontario Geological
Survey Open File #6112
NORANDA/MATTAGAMI REPORTS
BELLO, A, CASEY, J. and PARKER, D.1986: Diamond Drilling Report 1986-87, Band-Ore Property, N.T.S. 52B/9, Northwest Ontario
District, Project 1245, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, May l, 1987. BELLINGER, W. and BELLO,A. 1988: Report of Work, Band-Ore Property, N.T.S. 52B/9, Northwest Ontario District, Project 1245,
Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, March 25,1988. BELLINGER, W. 1992: Summary Report, Band-Ore Property, Conacher Township, Ontario, N.T.S. 52B/9,
Northwest Ontario District, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, January24, 1992.
CASEY, J. 1985: Final Report on the Sixth Program, Band-Ore Mines Option, N.T.S. 52B/9, Project 1245,
Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Nov 21,1985. CASEY, J. 1985: Report on the Core Relogging Program, Band-Ore Option Property, No.4 Zone, N.T.S.
52B/9,, Project 1245, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, June 13,1986. HUSKA, K.J. 1982: Diamond Drilling Report and Pre Evaluation study on the Band-Ore Option, Conacher
Township, Ontario; Mattagami Lake Exploration Company Limited, December 1982. HUSKA, K.J. 1981: Report on the Initial Program on the Band-Ore Option; Mattagami Lake Exploration
Company Limited, January 1981.
17
NEILSEN, P.1984: Geochemical Report, Band-Ore Extension, N.T.S. 52B/9, Project 1245, Northwest Ontario
District, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Nov 26, 1984. PARKER, D. 1986: Report on Work Diamond Drilling, Band-Ore Property, N.T.S. 52B/9, Northwest Ontario
District, Project 1245, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Dec 12, 86. PURDY, N. and CLUFF, R. 1984: Report on the Fifth Program, Band-Ore Mines Option, N.T.S. 52B/9,, Project 1245, Noranda
Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Dec, 1984. SUTHERLAND, D. 1982: Memorandum Detail IP Survey Zones l A 8 Greenwich Option Shebandowan Ont. for
Mattagami Lake Exploration Limited, March 1982. THOMPSON, K. 1989: Report on Diamond Drilling, Band-Ore Property, N.T.S. 52B/9, Northwest Ontario District,
Project 1245, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Oct 31. WALLIS, C.S. 1980: Summary Report of the Band-Ore Property, Noranda Exploration Company Limited,
September 1980.
18
APPENDIX I
2000 BAND-ORE SAMPLE RESULTS
19
APPENDIX I- 2000 BAND-ORE SAMPLE RESULTS
Trench
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
DuessSample #
401514015240153401544015540156401574015840159401604016140162401634016440165401664016740168401694017040171401724017340174
ResultsAu (oz/ton)
0.0410.0190.2240.0450.0160.1560.0790.3700.0690.0050.0450.0110.0130.0010.0010.0040.3010.5490.1400.1260.2290.8040.0520.019
Trench
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBDDDDDDD
DuessSample #
4017540176401774017840179401804018140182401834018440185401864018740188401894019040191401927481748274837484748574867487
ResultsAu (oz/ton)
O.OOlO.OOlO.OOlO.OOlO.OOlO.OOlO.OOl0.0060.1770.002
O.OOlO.OOl0.340
O.OOl0.0010.0010.0030.0020.1430.9410.3240.0140.3840.0120.010
20
APPENDIX II
iPL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
21
APPENDIX II - iPL ANALYTICAL RESULTS COPPER AND GOLD RESULTS ONLY
Certificated 03H1222 Client: Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BANDORR No. of Samples: 58 Sample Type: Soil Date In: Aug 01, 2003 Date Out: Aug 11,2003 Grid l Grid 4
Line
1L1+OOE
1L1+OOE1L1+OOE 1L1+OOE1L1+OOE 1L1+OOE1L2+OOE 1L2+OOE1L2+OOE 1L2+OOE1L2+OOE 1L2+OOE1L3+OOE 1L3+OOE1L3+OOE 1L3+OOE1L3+OOE 1L3+OOE1L4+OOE 1L4+OOE1L4+OOE 1L4+OOE1L4+OOE 1L4+OOE1L5+OOE 1L5+OOE1L5+OOE 1L5+OOE1L5+OOE 1L5+OOE
Station
0+OOSA
0+OOSB0+50SA 0+50SB1+OOSA 1+OOSB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB1+OOSA 1+OOSB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB1+OOSA 1+OOSB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB0+80SA 0+80SB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB0+85 SA 0+85 SB
Au Cu ppb ppm^ 29
^ 534 15 ^ 21^ 32 2 33
289 39 163 54^ 33 4 442 28 12 44^ 23 ^ 25^ 29 ^ 81^ 25 ^ 85^ 27 ^ 34^ 12 ^ 22<2 169 317 263^ 27 <2 33^ 20 34 30<2 21 ^ 31
Line
4LO+OOE
4LO+OOE4LO+OOE 4LO+OOE4LO+OOE 4LO+OOE4L1+OOE 4L1+OOE4L1+OOE 4L1+OOE4L1+OOE 4L1+OOE4L2+OOE 4L2+OOE4L2+OOE 4L2+OOE4L2+OOE 4L2+OOE4L3+OOE 4L3+OOE4L3+OOE 4L3+OOE4L3+OOE 4L3+OOE4L4+OOE 4L4+OOE4L4+OOE 4L4+OOE
Station
0+00 A
0+00 B0+50NA 0+50NB0+50SA 0+50SB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50NA 0+50NB0+50SA 0+50SB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50NA 0+50NB0+50SA 0+50SB0+00 A 0+00 B5+50SA 5+50SB1+50SA 1+50SB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB
Au ppb
Cu ppm
^ 27
^ 10497
^10
^^<2
^
<2 <2<2 <2
^<2<2<2
<2^<2<2
<2
507524 13516 3014 36203161 10170 13940 3936 3916 3128 43125228 63
22
ALL SOIL RESULTS
Note: Results from the following elements were included in the iPl ICP soil sample analysis butexcluded from this Appendix as they were not consider either anomalous or relevant.Excluded elements were: Sb, Hg, Tl, Bi, Cd, Co, Ba, W, W, Cr, V, Mn, La, Sr, Zr, Se, Ti, Al, Mg, P.Certificate*: 03H1222Client: Orequest Consultants Ltd.Project: BANDORRNo. of Samples: 58Sample Type: SoilDate In: Aug01,2003Date Out: Aug 11, 2003
GRID1 Sample Name1L1+OOEO+OOSA 1L1+OOE 0+OOSB
1L1+OOE 0+50SA 1L1+OOE 0+50SB
1L1+OOE 1+OOSA 1L1+OOE 1+OOSB
1L2+OOE 0+00 A 1L2+OOE 0+00 B
1L2+OOE 0+50SA 1L2+OOEO+50SB
1L2+OOE 1+OOSA 1L2+OOE 1+OOSB
1L3+OOE 0+00 A 1L3+OOE 0+00 B
1L3+OOE 0+50SA 1L3+OOE 0+50SB
1L3+OOE 1+OOSA 1L3+OOE 1+OOSB
1L4+OOEO+OOA 1L4+OOE 0+00 B
1L4+OOE 0+50SA 1L4+OOEO+50SB
1L4+OOE 0+80SA 1L4+OOE 0+80SB
1L5+OOE 0+00 A 1L5+OOE 0+00 B
1L5+OOE 0+50SA 1L5+OOEO+50SB
1L5+OOE 0+85SA 1L5+OOE 0+85SB
Au ppb
24
2
289 163
4
2 12
?2
2
^ ^
^ ^
<2
<2 317<2
^ 34<2 <2
Ag Cu Pb ppm ppm ppm
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
1 0.5
0.1 0.1
0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 O.I
0.1 O.I
O.I O.I
O.I 0.1
O.I 0.3
O.I O.I
O.I 0.1
O.I O.I
29 53
15 21
32 33
39 54
33 44
28 44
23 25
2981
25 85
27 34
1222
169 263
27 33
20 30
21 31
913
15 14
11 15
11 14
13 10
17 12
12 10
18 14
9 13
11 9
12 13
8 11
13 12
13 13
9 10
Zn As ppm ppm
45 < 53 <42 < 43 <176 < 92 <
67 <277 <46 < 38 <181 < 108 <57 < 51 <
239 <274 <244 < 520 <121 < 77 <198 < 131 <
3831 < 4492 <127 < 58 <356 <
360 <
110 <77 <
Mo Ni ppm ppm
5 2 5 3
5 2 5 1
5 35 2
5 2 5 2
5 2 5 2
5 2 5 2
5 2 S 2
5 2 5 2
5 1 5 2
5 3 5 2
5 2 5 2
S 2 5 1
5 2 5 2
5 1 5 3
5 2 5 2
3937
25 29
44 39
22 12
3633
37 54
36 35
4452
17 20
31 33
2935
41 40
36 34
36 45
3434
CaVo
0.8 0.91
0.35 0.44
0.25 0.27
0.17 0.09
0.27 0.34
0.24 0.34
0.25 0.26
0.29 0.39
0.34 0.36
0.26 0.29
0.19 0.29
0.59 0.62
0.24 0.27
0.19 0.24
0.3 0.34
Fe'/o
3.3 3.57
2.37 2.31
4.123.25
2.83 2.68
3.27 3.22
3.89 5.07
3.09 2.94
4.29 4.46
1.96 2.16
3.5 2.93
3.65 3.55
3.814.34
3.32 3.06
3.5 4.14
3.13 3.19
KVo
0.07 0.11
0.04 0.05
0.08 0.06
0.05 0.04
0.05 0.05
0.1 0.09
0.04 0.05
0.08 0.13
0.03 0.04
0.06 0.05
0.07 0.07
0.08 0.1
0.06 0.06
0.08 0.08
0.05 0.08
Na /o
0.14 0.13
0.05 0.08
0.06 0.06
0.04 0.03
0.06 0.08
0.05 0.06
0.05 0.06
0.05 0.06
0.08 0.07
0.05 0.06
0.06 0.08
0.1 0.1
0.05 0.06
0.04 0.05
0.07 0.09
23
GRID 4 Sample Name4LO+OOE 0+00 A 4LO+OOE 0+00 B
4LO+OOE 0+50NA 4LO+OOE 0+50NB
4LO+OOE 0+50SA 4LO+OOE 0+50SB
4L1+OOEO+OOA 4L1+OOEO+OOB
4L1+OOEO+50NA 4L1+OOE 0+50NB
4L1+OOE 0+50SA 4L1+OOEO+50SB
4L2+OOE 0+00 A 4L2+OOE 0+00 B
4L2+OOE 0+50NA 4L2+OOE 0+50NB
4L2+OOE 0+50SA 4L2+OOE 0+50SB
4L3+OOE 0+00 A 4L3+OOE 0+00 B
4L3+OOE 5+50SA 4L3+OOE 5+50SB
4L3+OOE 1+50SA 4L3+OOE 1+50SB
4L4+OOE 0+00 A 4L4+OOE 0+00 B
4L4+OOE 0+50SA 4L4+OOE 0+50SB
Au ppb
2
97
10
^
^
^ ^
^ ^
<2
^ <2
<2
<2<2
^<2
<2
<2<2
Ag ppmO.I O.I
0.1 0.1
0.1 O.I
0.1
0.1 O.I
O.I O.I
O.I O.I
O.I O.I
O.IO.I
O.I O.I
O.I O.I
O.I O.I
O.I O.I
O.I O.I
Cu Pb Zn As ppm ppm ppm ppm
27 104
5075
24 135
16 30
14 36
20 31
61 101
70 139
40 39
36 39
16 31
28 43
12 52
28 63
19 17
1722
18 18
18 14
16 13
14 10
1922
15 18
14 15
1011
12 13
11 13
6 12
15 13
119 <124 <88 < 105 <122 < 109 <
166 <115 <
92 <75 <68 < 49 <82 < 82 <79 < 61 <
80 <71 <38 < 40 <67 < 54 <
69 <72 <28 < 51 <87 < 67 <
Mo Ni ppm ppm
5 3 5 4
5 2 5 3
5 2 5 2
5 3 5 3
5 1 5 2
5 4 5 2
5 3 5 4
5 4 5 3
5 3 5 3
5 1 5 2
5 3 5 3
5 2 5 2
5 3
5 2 5 3
42 70
58 62
4877
3644
33 41
46 45
6477
52 82
51 46
39 48
37 49
3147
28 48
51 57
Ca /o
0.22 0.39
0.36 0.39
0.21 0.37
0.17 0.26
0.15 0.23
0.2 0.29
0.34 0.46
0.79 0.73
0.25 0.27
0.34 0.37
0.24 0.3
0.42 0.48
0.27 0.44
0.23 0.33
Fe"/o
4.42 5.26
4.33 5.27
3.64 4.33
3.63 3.78
3.18 3.84
3.93 3.46
4.77 4.94
3.45 4.07
4.21 3.63
3.03 3.12
3.48 3.45
3.14.12
2.49 3.6
4.14 4
K'/o
0.12 0.34
0.13 0.13
0.09 0.14
0.1 0.09
0.07 0.1
0.07 0.09
0.17 0.2
0.17 0.31
0.11 0.11
0.08 0.11
0.08 0.1
0.14 0.17
0.06 0.22
0.1 0.16
Na"/o
0.04 0.07
0.07 0.07
0.05 0.07
0.04 0.05
0.04 0.05
0.05 0.06
0.06 0.07
0.06 0.08
0.05 0.05
0.07 0.07
0.05 0.05
0.05 0.06
0.06 0.08
0.05 0.06
24
ROCK SAMPLE RESULTS
Note: Results from the following elements were included in the iPl ICP rock sample analysis butexcluded from this Appendix as they were not consider either anomalous or relevant.Excluded elements were: Sb, Hg, Tl, Bi, Cd, Co, Ba, W, W, Cr, V, Mn, La, Sr, Zr, Se, Ti, Al, Mg, P.
Certificated 03H1216Client: Orequest Consultants Ltd.Project: BANDORENo. of Samples: 6Date In: Aug01,2003Date Out: Aug 08,2003Sample Number885158851688518885198852188522
Au ppb334
10650526027701630
44
Ag ppm
130.511.29.24.20.4
Cu ppm
2610559
13211244
Pb ppm
949104
133
Zn ppm414491171374
187762
As Mo ppm ppm^ 2^ 2^ 2^ 2^ 1^ 2
Ni ppm
44
ci27
27
Ca"/o
0.460.840.260.660.153.39
Fe07o
1.884.192.944.334.053.25
K"/o
0.130.140.130.140.150.16
Na "/o
0.090.080.080.080.07
0.1
METALLIC SCREEN ROCK SAMPLE RESULTS
Certificated 03H1222Client: Orequest Consultants Ltd.Project: BANDORRNo. of Samples: 2Date In: Aug O l, 2003Date Out: Aug 11,2003
Sample Name88517 88520
Total
Sample g975.96 1123.2
+150M -150M Au+150 Sample g Sample g g/t
13.88 49.96
962.08 1073.24
149.55 16.9
Au-150 Au Total
g/t g/t31.05
8.8532.73
9.21
Sample Name
88517 88520
Aug/t
33.3 9.7
Agg/t
75.2 25.7
Ag ppm
6824
Cu ppm
47 153
Pb ppm
15 11
Znppm
156 590
As ppm
^
Ca"/o
0.63 1.96
Fe"/o
9.46 7.81
Na"/o
0.06 0.05
Note: Results from the following elements were included in the iPl ICP analysis of the rock samples butexcluded from this Appendix as they were not consider either anomalous or relevant.Excluded elements were: Mo, Ni, Sb, Hg, Tl, Bi, Cd, Co, Ba, W, W, Cr, V, Mn, La, Sr, Zr, Se, Ti, Al, Mg, K,P.
25
APPENDIX HI
iPL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
26
APPENDIX m- iPL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
1. METHOD OF 30 ELEMENT ANALYSIS BY AQUA REGIA DIGESTION/ICP
(a) 0.50 grams of sample is digested with diluted Aqua Regia solution by heating in a hot water bath, at about 95 Celsius for 90 minutes, then cooled and bulked up to a fixed volume with de-mineralized water, and thoroughly mixed. Digested samples are let settled over night to separate residue from solution.
(b) The specific elements are determined using an Inductively Coupled Argon Plasmaspectrophotometer. All elements are corrected for inter-element interference. All data are subsequently stored onto computer diskette.
Quality ControlThe machine is first calibrated using three known standards and a blank. The test samples are
then run in batches.
A sample batch consists of 38 or less samples. Two tubes are placed before a set. These are an In-house standard and an acid blank, which are both digested with the samples. A known standard with characteristics best matching the samples is chosen and placed after every fifteenth sample. After every 38th sample (not including standards), two samples, chosen at random, are re- weighed and analyzed. At the end of a batch, the standard and blank used at the beginning is rerun. The readings for these knowns are compared with the pre-rack knowns to detect any calibration drift.
Note: Some elements may not be completely digested
2. METHOD OF GOLD ANAL YSIS B Y FIRE ASSA Y/AAS
(a) 10.00 to 30.00 grams of sample was weighed into a fusion pot which contained a combination of fluxes such as lead oxide, sodium carbonate, borax, silica flour, baking flour or potassium nitrate. After the sample and fluxes had been mixed thoroughly, some silver inquart and a thin layer of borax was added on top.(b) The sample was then charged into a fire assay furnace at 2000 F for one hour, at this stage, lead oxide would be reduced to elemental lead and slowly sunken down to the bottom of the fusion pot and collected the gold and silver along the way.(c) After one hour of fusion, the sample was then taken out and pour into a conical cast iron mould, the elemental lead which contained precious metals would stayed at the bottom of the mould and any unwanted materials called slag would floated on top and removed by hammering, a "lead button" is formed.(d) The lead button was then put back in the furnace onto a preheated cupel for a second stage of separation, at 1650 F, the lead button became liquefied and absorbed by the cupel, but gold and silver which had higher melting points would stayed on top of the cupel.(e) After 45 minutes of cupellation, the cupel was then taken out and cooled, the dore bead which contained precious metals was then transferred into a test tube and dissolved in hot Aqua Regia solution heated by a hot water bath.
fi* . -- - -
27
(f) The gold in solution is determined with an Atomic Absorption spectrometer. The gold value, in parts-per-billion, or grams-per-tonne is calculated by comparison with a set of known gold standards.
Quality ControlEvery fusion of 24 pots contains 22 samples, one internal standard or blank, and a random
reweigh of one of the samples. Samples with anomalous gold values greater than 1000 ppb are automatically checked by Fire Assay/AA methods. Samples with gold values greater than 10000 ppb are automatically checked by Fire Assay/Gravimetric methods.
3. METHOD OF METALLIC GOLD ANALYSIS BY FIRE ASSAY
Sample preparation:(a) Samples are crushed to -10 mesh, riffle split into 250 grams and pulverized, The coarse
fraction is then screened out by using a 150 mesh size screen. The entire +150 mesh and a portion of minus are assay separately and a combined total gold in g/mt is calculated based on the weight of both fraction.
(b) 20 to 30 grams of samples was weighed into a fusion pot with fluxes such as lead oxide,sodium carbonate, borax, silica flour, baking flour or potassium nitrate. After the sample and fluxes had been mixed thoroughly, some silver inquart and a thin layer of borax was added on top.
(c) The sample was then charged into a fire assay furnace at 2000 F for one hour, at his stage, lead oxide would be reduced to elemental lead and slowly sunken down to the bottom of the fusion pot and collected the gold and silver along the way.
(d) After one hour of fusion, the sample was taken out and pour into a conical cast iron mould. The elemental lead which contained precious metals would stayed at the bottom of the mould and any unwanted materials called slag would floated on top and removed by hammering, a "lead button" is formed.
(e) The lead button was then put back in the furnace onto a preheated cupel for a second stage of separation, at 1650 F, the lead burton became liquefied and absorbed by the cupel, but gold and silver which had higher melting points would stayed on top of the cupel.
(f) After 45 minutes of cupellation, the cupel was then taken out and cooled, the dore bead which contained precious metals was then weighed and transferred into a test tube and dissolved in hot Aqua Regia solution heated by a hot water bath.
(g) The gold in solution is determined with an Atomic Absorption spectrometer. The gold value, in parts-per-billion, or grams-per-tonne is calculated by comparison with a set of known gold standards.
Quality ControlEvery fusion of 24 pots contains 22 samples, one internal standard or blank, and a random
reweigh of one of the samples. Samples with anomalous gold values greater than 500 ppb are automatically checked by Fire Assay/AA methods. Samples with gold values greater than 10000 ppb are automatically checked by Fire Assay/Gravimetric methods.
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iI'LU3HI222
Orcquest ConsultantsProject : BANDORE Shipper : George Cavey Shipment: P00: Comment:
26332 60 Samples Out: Aug 11, 2003 In: Aug 01, 2003 Page l of ||2
i Columbia Slreet Vancouver. B.C. Canada V5Y 3E1 Phone (00-1) 879-7070 F ux (G04) 079-7090 F.rnail iplabOtolns nel
[122218:06:15:30081103:001]
Document Distributionl Orequest Consultants Ltd. 306 - 595 Howe Street Vancouver B.C. V6C 2T5 Canada At t: George Cjvey
EH RT CC IN FX11121
DL 3D EH BT BL00100
Ph:604^88-6788Fx:6047688-9727
Em: gcaveyPorequest . com
CODE AMOUNT TYPE PREPARATION DESCRIPTIONBZ11 2 Rock crush, split K pulverize
B11100 58 Soil Dry 4 sift to -00 mesh, discard reject.
A ttfiltrf inol Cit **i**i n t-*r
ttm 5102030405
0607080910
1112131415
1617181920
2122232425
2627282930
3132333435
36
AnalyslVrAu(M'ciaVlic)"'Au(FAyAAii 30g) 1 ICT(AqU)30
Code Method Units Description
080Z Spec Smpl g Total Weight (Z Decimal)080Z Spec Smpl g Weight (2 Decimal)0802 Spec Smpl g -150H sample Weight (2 Decimal)036B FA/AAS g/mt +150H Au Fire Assay g/mt0368 FA/AAS g/mt -150M Au Fire Assay g/mt
0368 FA/AAS g/mt Total Au Fire Assay g/mt0364 FAGrav g/mt Au FA/Grav in g/mt0354 FAGrav g/mt Ag FA/Grav 1n g/mt0313 FA/AAS ppb Au FA/AAS finish 30g0721 ICP ppm Ag ICP
0711 ICP ppm Cu ICP0714 ICP ppm Pb ICP0730 ICP ppm Zn ICP0703 ICP ppm As ICP0702 ICP ppm Sb ICP
0732 ICP ppm Mg ICP0717 ICP ppm Mo ICP0747 ICP ppm Tl ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0705 ICP ppm B1 ICP0707 ICP ppm Cd ICP
0710 ICP ppm Co ICP0718 ICP ppm N1 ICP0704 ICP ppm Ba ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0727 ICP ppm W ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0709 ICP ppm Cr ICP (Incomplete Digestion)
0729 ICP ppm V ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0716 ICP ppm Mn ICP0713 ICP ppm La ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0723 ICP ppm Sr ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0731 ICP ppffl Zr ICP (Incomplete Digestion)
0736 ICP ppm Se ICP0726 ICP * T1 ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0701 ICP 1 Al ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0708 ICP * Ca ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0712 ICP * Fe ICP (Incomplete Digestion)
0715 ICC t Mg ICP (Incomplete '.'xjestion)
NS-llo Sample
Element
WtwtwtGoldGold
GoldGoldSilverGoldSilver
CopperLeadZincArsenicAntimony
MercuryMolydenumThalliumBismuthCadmium
CobaltNickelBariumTungstenChromium
VanadiumManganese *-LanthanumStrontiumZirconium
ScandiumTitaniumAluminumCalciumIron
Maonffs iiifti
PULP REJECT1211/Dis 03M/D1SIZM/Dis OOM/Dis
Rep-flepHcate M-Honth Dis-t)1scard
Limit LimitLow High
0.01 99999.000.01 99999.000.01 99999.000.01 10000.000.01 10000.00
0.01 10000.000.07 9999.000.3 9999.0
Z 100000.1 100.0
1 100002 100001 100005 100005 2000
s3 100001 1000
10 10002 2000
0.2 2000.0
1 100001 100002 100005 10001 10000
1 100001 100002 100001 100001 10000
1 100000.01 10.000.01 10.000.01 10.000.01 10.00
/fi) 01 ft 10.00
l N l v .ii-pir ' K l Id p :: V.'. i" IN -
i h l j
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iPL 03111222
nmmwnoxM PIMMA uioMnxt uo
Orcquest Consultants Ltd.Project : BANDORE Shipper : George Cavey Shipment: PW: Comment:
60 Samples Out: Aug 11. 2003 In: AugOl. 2003 Page 2 of (2
i!03G Columbia SUocl Vancouver, D.C Canada V5Y 3E1 Chone (604) 879-7878 Fax (604) 879-7890tlmoil iplab@lelus riel
[122218:06:15:30081103:001]
Document Distribution-1 Orequest Consultants Ltd.
306 - 595 Howe Street Vancouver B.C. V6C 2T5 Canada Att: George Cavey
EN RT CC IN FX 11121
OL 3D EH BT BL 00100
Ph:60V68B-6788Fx:604X688-9727
Em: gcaveytforequest.com
Code Method Units Description
0720 ICP * K 1CP (Incomplete Digestion)0722 ICP X Na ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0719 ICP * P ICP
Element
PotassiumSodiumPhosphorus
LimitLow
0.010.010.01
LimitHigh10.0010.00B.00
l!'
lw W JRiww*
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS il'L 03111222
Client : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BAIIDORR
60 Samples2-Rock 58-Soll [122216:57:24:30081103:001]-
Out: Aug 111. 2003 In : Aug 01, 2003
i'036 Columbia SlietM V.'i'icijuvci. H C C;iiiadaV!iY 3H Phone (004) 879-7070 Fax (604)079-7890 Ginail iplabfllRlijs.nel
Page l of 2 Section l of 3
Sample Name
88517 88520 1L1+OOE 0+OOSA 1L1+OOE 0+OOSB 1L1+OOE 0+50SA
1L1+OOE 0+50SB 1L1+OOE 1+OOSA 1L1+OOE 1+OOSB 1L2+OOE 0+00 A 1L2+OOE 0+00 B
1L2+OOE 0+50SA 1L2+OOE 0+50SB 1L2+OOE 1+OOSA 1L2+OOE 1+OOSB 1L3+OOE 0+00 A
1L3+OOE 0+00 B -. 1L3+OOE 0+50SA 1L3+OOE 0+50SB 1L3+OOE 1+OOSA 1L3+OOE 1+OOSB
1L4+OOE 0+00 A 1L4+OOE 0+00 B 1L4+OOE 0+50SA 1L4+OOE 0+50SB 1L4+OOE 0+80SA
1L4+OOE 0+80SB 1L5+OOE 0+00 A 1L5+OOE 0+00 B 1L5+OOE 0+50SA 1L5+OOE 0+50SB
1L5+OOE 0+85SA 1L5+OOE 0+85SB 410+OOE 0+00 A 4LO+OOE 0+00 B 4LO+OOE 0+50NA
4LO+OOE 0+50NB 4LO+OOE 0+50SA 4LO+OOE 0+50SB 4l)*OOE 0+00 A
Him"! i"! |)P! J M ion Md* ir ."i Dot"1. 1. 'en Met' :
Type
Rock Rock
Soil Soil
Soil Soil Soil Soil
Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Soil Soil Soil Soil
Total +150M -150H Au+150 Au- 150 Au Ttl Au Ag Smpl g Smpl g Smpl g g/mt g/mt g/mt g/mt g/mt
975.96 13.88 962.08 149.55 31.05 32.73 33.30 75.2 1123.20 49.96 1073.24 16.90 8.85 9.21 9.70 25.7
— — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —
— — — _-_____
— — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —.
— — — _____
— — .,. — .... — —
o.o) o.t'i o.;.1 : o.yi o.ui o 01 o o- sij'J-y no y-."-'-* op -'^ f. looon.or i;n!0!! OD mooo.oo 99^ ;m .'.' v
Au I'l'b
_..—*2•c?4
^^2
?09163
^4212'2
<2'2<2-.2<2
<2'2<2<2<2
317'2'2<23*
'2'2<2<297
<2*210<2
Ag ppm
68.024.00.10.10.2
0.20.10.11.00.5
0.1'0.1'0.10.1'O.i0.1
'0.1'O.i0.1
<0.1
'O.i'O.i<0.1'0.1'0.10.3
'0.1'0.1'0.10.1
'0.1'0.'0.'0.'0.
0.0.
'0.O.I
Cuppm
47153295315
213233395-1
3344204-123
2529012585'
27341222169
26327332030
213127
10450
75H13516
Pb ppm
15119
1315
1411151114
1310171212
1018149
' 13
119
12133
1113121313
910191717
2218in18
Znppm
156590455342
431769267
277
4638
18110857
51239274244520
12177
198131
3831
449212758
356360
11077
11912488
105122109166
Asppm
'5'5'5'5'5
'5'5'5'5'5
'5'5'5'5'5
'5'5'5'5'5
'5'5'5'5'5
'5'5'5'5'5
'5'5'5'5'5
'5'5'5'-5
Sbppm
'5'5'5'5^
'5^^^'5
'5'5^^'5
'5^'5^*5
'5^'5^^
^'5'5'5'5
'5'5'5'5'5
'5*5'5•-•5
Mgppm
'3'3'3'3'3
'3'3'3'3'3
^'3'3'3'3
'3'3'3'3'3
'3'3'3'3'3
'3'3'3'3'3
'3'3'3'3'3
'3'3'3O
l
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iPL 03111222
2036 Columbia Slieel Vancouver, G.C. Canada V5Y 3t l Phone (604) 079-7070 Tax (601) 879-7898
INnillllllONU PIUMA UtOUIOH 110
:iient : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BANDORR
Sample Name
88517885201L1+OOE 0+OOSA1L1+OOE 0+005B1L1+OOE 0+50SA
1L1+OOE 0+50SB1H+OOE 1+OOSA1L1+OOE 1+OOSB1L2MJOE 0+00 A1L2+OOE 0+00 B
1L2+OOE 0+50SA1L2+OOE 0+50SB1L2+OOE 1+OOSA1L2+OOE 1+OOSB1L3+OOE 0+00 A
1L3+OOE 0+00 B '\1L3+OOE 0+50SA1L3+OOE 0+50SB1L3+OOE 1+OOSA1L3+OOE 1+OOSB
1L4+OOE 0+00 A1L4+OOE 0+00 B1L4+OOE 0+50SA1L4+OOE 0+50SB1L4+OOE 0+80SA
1L4+OOE 0+80SB1L5+OOE 0+00 A1L5+OOE 0+00 B1L5+OOE 0+50SA1L5+OOE 0+50SB
1L5+OOE 0+85SA1L5+OOE 0+85SB4LO+OOE 0+00 A4LO+OOE 0+00 B4LO*OOE 0+50NA
4LO+OOE 0+50NB4LO+OOE 0*50SA4LO+OOE 0+50SB4L1+OOE 0*00 A
Hinimura Oe'et i c'i Maximum Oru.1 ':'. i"'leiu.'.-l
Ho ppn
35232
13222
22222
2221Z
3222Z
12213
22342
3223
1 1000:ci
Tlppm
•UO•UO•aot !01 10
•ao*10^0^0•ao*10•00*10<10<10
<10•ao*10<10<10
elo•ao<10<10•:10
<10":104 10<10<10
*io*13<10<10'10
*10•MO<10* 10
ivKii' fi
60 Samples2-flock 58-Soll
B1ppm
^^^<2*2
<2<2^^^
*2<2<2<2^
<2<2<2<Z4
<2<2*2^4
<2<2<2<2^
<2*2eg<2^<2*2<2'2
i
1
Cd Co ppm ppm
*0.? 9^.2 li^.2 19^.2 21"0.2 14
*0.2 13e0.2 22"0.2 18"0.2 14*0.2 13
"0.2 19^.2 17^.2 19^.2 27^.2 17
*0.2 17^.2 17^.2 28*0.2 12"0.2 12
•:0.2 15^.2 16^.2 16^.2 20^.2 21
^.2 26^.2 18*0.2 17<0.2 19<0.2 22
^.2 200. 2 19^.2 21^.2 34*0.2 27
*0.2 31^.2 19•:0.2 32•:0.2 19
0 ? i,.:-,l) p ji.njr.
;ci " : '
Ni ppm
4•a393725
2944392212
3633375436
3544521720
3133293541
4036343645
3434427058
62487736
ii'
Bappm
42412020164
75136926666
7250786193
951831695090
7552
1067078
1151125514693
9763119104140
86153104167
'iiSOC-i;if.-' 1
VI ppra,e5^^•e5
^
^^^c5^
*5*5^*5*5
<5c5t 5<5^
<5<5<5^5*5
<5<5<5<5^
<5<5<5*5^
<545e;5
<5
L,
IIIUO 1H. f
Cr ppm
4646525126
3049402517
4236475144
4254912428
4746424665
6848425054
34416110169
815210946
- i
r.l22216:57:24:300U1103:001]
V ppm
916
142139118
1201591407439
176199176352126
121141172112112
13?134141167213
179130170131226
166146144265217
326116173113
..,;r
Mnppm
327966323557142
136226225190338
197197239348176
177233566142164
282232217248360
445253218241287
170252221429209
335239361413
1
i r
Lappm
33
13248
98101113
101311119
810121123
899
1116
1910119
10
611101411
13Q
1?11
r ,,;', ,'
Sr ppm
31793?4016
21121476
1012111314
1417171314
1111141623
2719121111
1423111417
1610139
i
i
Zr ppm
108773
36755
7846
, 4
54654
34696
55646
613688
104(I3
1I'.'COO :'' 1 1.
Out : In :
Se
^•:1472
33322
43443
33f.35
33446
74434
24475
53f).1
1
Aug li Auq 01.
li \
"0.01•:0.01
0.200.170.14
0.150.180.150.080.03
0.170.1B0.160.280.16
0.150.150.230.16
"0.16
0.130.140.170.190.23
0.200.140.160.140.19
0.170.190.160.290.23
0.280.140.230.13
'' '..i
pi I..
2003 2003
Al
0.791.271.B62.301.63
1.792.832.422.321.76
2.612.233.142.092.58
2.503. 873.361.131.32
2.382.212.902.781.46
1.752.841.712.912.46
2.232.453.493.293.25
2.863.393.B5'i 96
•il
Page 1 of 2 Section 2 of 3
Ca
0.631.960.800.910.35
0.440.250.270.170.09
0.270.340.240.340.25
0.260.290.390.340.36
0.260.290.190.290.59
0.620.240.270.190.24
0.300.340.220.390.36
0.390.210.370.17
.' '."M . - -J i 1
: "i-
Fe \
9.467.813.303.572.37
2.314.123.252.032.68
3.273.223.895.073.09
2.944.294.461.962.16
3.502.933.653.553.81
4.343.323.063.504.14
3.133.194.425.264.33
5.273.644.333.63
(' (ii; '"i
Mg K
0.470.690.900.850.34
0.410.620.520.440.41
0.560.540.660.690.49
0.480.651.110.330.36
0.600.570.550.590.80
0.890.660.490.560.63
0.480.880.731.290.93
1.050.711.350.51
•,; o i
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 1PL03HI222
INUPNATIONAI r
Client : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BANDORR
60 Samples2-Rock 58*Soil [122216:57:24:30081103:001]
Out. In
Auy lil j ?003 Aug 01, 2003
20'M Columbia Slteel Vancouver, BC. Cnnadii V5Y ,'JE 1 Phone (GO*) 879-7070 Tax (GO'1) 879-7890 Email iplnb^lalus.nd
Page l of Section 3 of
Sample Name
88517885201L1+OOE 0+OOSA1L1+OOE 0+OOSB1L1+OOE 0+50SA
1L1+OOE 0+50SB1L1+OOE 1+OOSA1L1+OOE 1+OOSB1L2+OOE 0+00 A1L2+OOE.O+00 B
1L2+OOE 0+50SA1L2+OOE 0+50SB1L2+OOE 1+OOSA1L2+OOE 1+OOSB1L3+OOE 0+00 A
1L3+OOE 0+00 B v1L3+OOE 0+50SA1L3+OOE 0+50SB1L3+OOE 1+OOSA1L3+OOE 1+OOSB
1L4+OOE 0+00 A1L4+OOE 0+00 B1L4+OOE 0+50SA1L4+OOE 0+50SB1L4+OOE 0+80SA
1L4+OOE 0+80SB1L5+OOE 0+00 A1L5+OOE 0+00 B1L5+OOE 0+50SA1L5+OOE 0+50SB
1L5+OOE 0+B5SA1LS+OOE 0+85SB4LO+OOE 0+00 A4LO+OOE 0+00 B4LO+OOE 0+50NA
4LO+OOE 0+50NB4LO+OOE 0+50SA4LO+OOE 0+50SB4L1+OOE 0+00 A
Minimum Deled icn iiixTinuni iJetficl i. M
KH
0.090.090.070.110.04
0.050.080.060.050.04
0.050.050.100.090.04
0.050.080.130.030.04
0.060.050.070.070.08
0.100.060.060.080.08
0.050.080.120.340.13
0.130.090.140.10
0.' .
NaK
0.060.050.140.130.05
0.080.060.060.040.03
0.060.08O.OS0.060.05
0.060.050.060.080-07
0.050.060.06O.OB0.10
0.100.050.060.040.05
0.070.090.040.070.07
0.070.050.070.04
.'i 1 1
P*
0.020.030.030.030.02
0.030.030.030.040.04
0.04 ,0.050.120.070.04
0.040.070.070.010.01
0.040.040.030.030.04
0.050.030.040.050.05
0.030.020.080.080.06
0.060.090.080.08
0.01 u . 00
•O-M
IP^(W "W
MSfi*36**Tf "
CERTIFICATE OK ANALYSISil'L 03111 222
INtltNtllOMU PIAIM* lAIOUtOIT HO
Client : OrequestVoject: BANDORR
Sample Name
4L1+OOE 0+00 B4L1+OOE 0+50N4U+OOE 0+50 B4L1+OOE 0+50SA4L1+OOE 0+50SB
4L2+OOE 0+00 A4L2+OOE 0+00 B412+OOE 0+50NA4L2+OOE 0+50NB4L2+OOE 0+50SA
4L2+OOE 0+50SB4L3+OOE 0+00 A4L3+OOE 0+00 B4L3+OOE 5+50SA4L3+OOE.5+50SB
4L3+OOE 1+50SA-;4L3+OOE 1+50SB4L4+OOE 0+00 A4L4+OOE 0+00 B4L4+OOE 0+50SA
4L4+OOE 0+50SB
Minimum Oeiec* ". " •'lAxifljim Di' t ("ri : : : Mi'lltOi)
Consultants Ltd.
Type
SoilSoilSoilSoilSoil
SoilSoilSoilSoilSoil
SoilSoilSoilSoilSoil
SoilSoilSoilSoilSoil
Soil
*
60 Samples2-Rock 58=5011 [122216:57:24:30081103:001]
Total +150H -150H Au+150 Au-150 Au Ttl Au Ag Au AgSmpl g Smpl g Smpl g g/mt g/mt g/mt g/mt g/mt ppb ppm
_ _ . _ _ . — _ . — r-2 ^0 1—— — — —— — — . .. — <2 cQ.l— — — — — — .- t? eQ.l— — ~ .... — — *2 <0.1— — — — .- — ... <2 cO.l
— — — _____<2 .cO.l— — — — — — — _<2<0.1— — — — _ — _ _ <2<0.1— — _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ *0 . l— — — — — — — — '-2 0.1
— — — — — — — — <2 *0.1— — — — — — — — <2 tfl.'l
— — — — .- — - ^2 ^.1_ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ <2 *: 0 1. _ . ^ ̂ . _ . ^^^ ^^ ^ _ . _ _ ^2 <o 1
^^ , _ _ ,. _ _ ^ _ _ _ ^2 <^ i^ _ , ^.^ ^^, . _ . . _ . _ _ _ ^2 en 1_ _ _ c y c n i —— — - — — — — — - .p.^- *,^ -*u 1 1— — — — — — _ _ c2 <0.1— — — — — — — — c2 ^.1
5.01 C. 01 0.01 01 0.01 0 L'i l'. 'J/ 0 J -' 1ojiiso oo ? c?9y oy -.^^99 o"- ; ;'"'- oo ;^ ; i;fio IK; liioiu; u:; --vy) ov ••••w o i^r" *
Out:In :
Cuppm
3014362031
61101
7013940
3936391631
2843125228
63
i
i i
Aug \ l!.Aug 01.
Pbppm
1416131410
1922151814
1510111213
11136
12-' 15
13
-HM
?0032003
Znppm
11592756849
0282796180
7138406754
6972205187
67
i
203(3 Columbia Slieol Vancouver, l). C.Canada V5Y3C1 Phone (604) 879-7078Tax (604) 879-7090Email iplabOlalus riel
Page 2 of 2Section 1 of 3
As Sb Hgppro ppm ppm
*5 ^ c3^ ^ *3*5 ^ O^ <5 O^ *5 <3
t5 ^ ^<5 <5 <3^ *5 <3*5 <5 0^ <5 <3
<5 *5 <3•^5 *5 O^ <5 <3<5 <5 *3<5 *5 *3
<5 t 5 f 3*5 ^5 <3^ <5 <3<5 <5 ^<5 <5 <3
<5 *5 <3
fi i) i i'lOl'O .^'00 i""'.".'
9Jjf P~ WPS*
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS il'LU3H1222
H* UHOIUIOM no
iUJo LoiuinUia btieel Vancouver DC. Conacta V5Y 3E t Phone (004) 0/9-7870 fax (GO'1) 0/9-7U9U
;iient : Orequest Consultants Ltd. 'reject: BANDORR
Sample Name
4L1+OOE 0+00 B4L1+OOE 0+50N4L1+OOE 0+50 B4L1+OOE 0+50SA4L1+OOE 0+50SB
4L2+OOE 0+00 A4L2+OOE 0+00 B4L2+OOE 0+50HA4L2+OOE 0+50NB4L2+OOE 0+50SA
4L2+OOE 0+50SB4L3+OOE 0+00 A4L3+OOE 0+00 B4L3+OOE 5+50SA4L3+OOE 5+SOSB
4L3+OOE 1+50SA4L3+OOE 1+50SB ~4L4+OOE 0+00 A4L4+OOE 0+00 B4L4+OOE 0+50SA
4L4+OOE 0+50SB
MV Mm DeiectionM,.. .Mm |V-r eel mn
Ho ppm
31242
34433
31233
22
•432
3
11000 ...p
Tl ppm
•40"10"10•40•40
•40<10<10<10
. <10
• 10<10<10•40<10
•10<10<10•10•10
lu loonl).l. '
60 Samples2^ock 58-
Bi Cdppm ppm
<2 0.2^ <0.2^ •0.2•2 •0 2•2 '0.2
•2 •O.?•2 *0.2<2 •0.2*2 *0.2•2 *0.2
•2 •0.2•2 e0.2•2 *0.2•2 *0.2•2 *0.2
•2 •O. 2•2 •0.2•2 *0.2•2 0.2•2 •O. 2
i' U , ?nno ?orn i ;r.p :
Co ppm
2017232221
2834242627
2217191822
1823132321
27
i
Soil
Ni ppm
4433414645
6477528251
4639483749
3147284851
57
1 liiOC'O
;.T
Ba ppm
12915111410397
110102165160104
808695
1231ZO
821194697127
75
•t j, moo
W Cr ppm ppm
•5 52•5 42•5 57•5 50•5 49
•5 835 1025 65
•5 91•5 65
•5 55•5 42•5 55•5 43•5 49
•5 54•5 72•5 27•5 59•5 56
•5 59
5 J 1000 10000I.I 1 1 . 1
V ppm
135104
.196188187
179171116136162
152152150150162
140162156160160
225
110000Mr
[122216:
Mnppm
343208256259250
323377382395209
199205232244239
4303-19200361240
335
iHUM,,.
57:24:30081103:001]
La ppm
119
1189
101555579
11101277
8106
148
10
•COi.i' -"i
Srppm
101011910
1316272411
1317181113
1516112212
11
1 .ii noo ...p
Z rppm
65956
77456
58745
57496
7
1
Oul: In :
Seppm
43434
57594
44423
34254
4
i
Aug 1 1 4 Any 01.
Ti
0.150.120.200.180.18
0.220.230.160.210.19
0.180.180.190.1C0.17
0.190.21C. 130.19(M7
0.21
0.0! 10. ("J
P003 2003
A) *
3.212.992.652.742.40
3.343.852.713.273.18
2.682.672.332.272.65
1.562.441.242.693.06
2.11
0.01 10 ('l.1
1 '. *
Page 2 of 2 Section 2 of 3
Ca V
0.260.150.230.200.29
0.340.460.790.730.25
0.270.340.370.240.30
0.420.480.270.440.23
0.33
o c:i,.-. .-..i
Fe
3.783.183.843.933.46
4.774.943.454.074.21
3.633.033.123.483.45
3.104.122.493.604.14
4.00
fi. t i !C v.
Mg V
0.700.560.750.570.65
1.021.280.901.260.72
0.640.620.790.57O.G6
0.741.030.391.000.71
0.79
0 01 i C' o;;
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISil'L 03111222
2030 Columbia SUcnl Vancouver. 13.C Canada V5Y 3E l Phone (604) 079-7870 Fax (G04) 879-7B90
Client : OrequeU Project: BANDOftf
Sample Name
4L1+OOE 0+00 B411+OOE 0+50N4L1+OOE 0+50 B4L1+OOE 0+50SA4L1+OOE 0+50SB
4L2+OOE 0+00 A4L2+OOE 0+00 B4L2+OOE 0+50NA4L2+OOE 0+50NB4L2+OOE 0+50SA
4L2+OOE 0+50SB4L3+OOE 0+00 A4L3+OOE 0+00 B4L3+OOE 5+50SA4L3+OOE 5+50SB
4L3+OOE 1+50SA.4L3+OOE 1+50SB ~4L4+OOE 0+00 A4L4+OOE 0+00 B4L4+OOE 0+50SA
4L4+OOE 0+50SB
'••n imuii. Detect u-n "..)-imuif LVUU'c:' ' Ml"!
Consultants Ltd.
K l
0.090.070.100.070.09
0.170.200.170.31o.ir0.110.080.110.08
' 0.10
0.140.170.060.220.10
0.16
0.01 10.00ir?
Na
0.050.040.050.050.06
0.060.070.060.080.05
0.050.070.070.050.05
0.050.060.060.08O.OS
0.06
a. ui10.00i C"
60 Samples Out: Aug HI. 2003 Page 2 of 2 2-Rock 58-Soll [122216:57:24:30081103:001] In : Aug 01. 2003 Section 3 of 3
P l
0.100.040.050.050.04
0.040.060.040.060.03
0.020.040.040.030.04 ,
0.020.030.030.050.06
0.05
i i
t
r
,1
1t l
|(li
,*
j:
C
1fJri;
i
i
0.01'. Hit
j.": 1
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iPL 03H1216
INTERNATIONAL PLASMA LABORATORY LTD
Orequest Consultants Ltd. 6 Samples Out: Aug 08. 2003 In: Aug 01. 2003
2036 Columbia Stioel Vancouver, B.C. Canada V5Y 3E1 Phone (604) 879-70/8 Fax (604) 879-7898 Email iplab@telns nnl
[121615:04:49:30080803:001]rrujeti. : onnuuncShipper : David GunningShipment: P0#:Coninicnt:
Document Distribution ————————————1 Orequest Consultants Ltd. EN RT CC IN FX
306 - 595 Howe Street 11121Vancouver DL 3D EM BT BLB.C. V6C 2T5 00100CanadaAtt: George Cavey Ph: 604/688 -6788
Fx: 604/688 -9727Em: gcaveyPorequest.com
2 D. R. Gunning Consultant EN RT CC IN FX11001
Langley DL 3D EM BT BLB.C. 01100CanadaAtt: David Gunning Ph 1604/533 -5678
FXI604/533-5648Em: d gunningPtelus.net
1^ ' s*o\'
stc"v*-^ (V*
C -~y;'f~ ̂V \,
009'C' " **
CODE AMOUNT TYPE PREPARATION DESCRIPTION PULP REJECTB211 6 Rock crush, split 4 pulverize 12M/D1S OSM/Dis
NS=No Sample Rep=Replicate M=Month Dis~DiscardA li olirtlf**ll di tnrkionr
m0102030405
0607080910
1112131415
1617181920
2122232425
2627282930
31
j— 1 11 di y 1. 1 V.H1 ILJ UIIIHIKIB T —————————————————————————————————————————————————— " ———————— ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Analysis: ICP(AqR)30 Au(FA7AAS 30g) 1
Code Method Units Description Element Limit LimitLow High
0313 FA/AAS ppb Au FA/AAS finish 30g Gold 2 100000721 ICP ppm Ag ICP Silver 0.1 100.00711 ICP ppm Cu ICP Copper 1 100000714 ICP ppm Pb ICP Lead 2 100000730 ICP ppm Zn ICP Zinc 1 10000
0703 ICP ppm As ICP Arsenic 5 100000702 ICP ppm Sb ICP Antimony 5 20000732 ICP ppm Hg ICP Mercury 3 100000717 ICP ppm Mo ICP Molydenum 1 10000747 ICP ppm Tl ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Thallium 10 1000
0705 ICP ppm Bi ICP Bismuth 2 20000707 ICP ppm Cd ICP Cadmium 0.2 2000.00710 ICP ppm Co ICP Cobalt 1 100000718 ICP ppm Ni ICP Nickel 1 100000704 ICP ppm Ba ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Barium 2 10000
0727 ICP ppm W ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Tungsten ' 5 10000709 ICP ppm Cr ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Chromium 1 100000729 ICP ppm V ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Vanadium 1 100000716 ICP ppm Mn ICP Manganese 1 100000713 ICP ppm La ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Lanthanum 2 10000
0723 ICP ppm Sr ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Strontium 1 100000731 ICP ppm Zr ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Zirconium 1 100000736 ICP ppm Se ICP Scandium 1 100000726 ICP * T1 ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Titanium 0.01 10.000701 ICP * Al ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Aluminum 0.01 10.00
0708 ICP * Ca ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Calcium 0.01 10.000712 ICP * Fe ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Iron 0.01 10.000715 ICP X Mg ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Magnesium 0.01 10.000720 ICP X K ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Potassium 0.01 10.000722 ICP * Na ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Sodium 0.01 10.00
0719 ICP * P ICP Phosphorus 0.01 5.00
| /)
EN=^nvelope# RT^Rcport Style CCK'opies IN=lnvoices Fx=Fax(l=YesO=No) Totals: ^Copy 2^nvoice 1=3 '/i Disk \ sT~~j?[^Download 30=3 M)isk EM^-Mail BT'BBS Type BL~BBS(^ Yes (^No) 10=0)1670103 /2fc\ S* Our liability is limited solely to the analytical cost of these analyses. BC Certified Assaycr: David Chill t g^f*\l '
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iPL 03H1216
INTERNATIONAL PI ASMA U60HATOBV IIP
Client : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BANDORE
6 Samples6-Rock [121615:04:49:30080803:001]
Out: In :
Aug 08. 2003 Aug 01, 2003
2036 Columbia Street Vancouver, B.C. Canada V5Y 3E1 Phone (6(M) 879-7078 Fax (604) 879-7890 Email [email protected]
Page l of Section 2 of
Sample Name Lappm
Sr ppm
Zr ppm
Se ppm
Ti Al*
Ca*
Fe X
Mg X
NaX
8851588516885188851988521
88522
3742274724
65
410898
11
l ^.01
a o.01 o.01 o.01
1704,n26
1.10
0.460.840.260.660.15
1.884.192.944.334.05
0.570.570.600.610.55
0.130.140.130.140.15
0.090.080.080.080.07
2 0.01 0.47 3.39 3.25 1.14 0.16 0.10
0.050.040.040.040.04
0.05
Minimum Detection - 2111 Maximum Detection 10000 10000 10000 10000 Method ICP ICP ICP ICP —^No Test Ins—Insufficient Sample DcHDelay Max=No Estimate
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 5.00
ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP Rec=ReClleck n^xlOOO "/(^Estimate "/o NS^o Sample
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS IPL03H1216
INTERNATIONAL PI ASM* lAROHATORY ITD
2036 Columbia Street Vancouver, B.C. Canada V5Y 3E1 Phono (GO'1) 079-7070 Fax (604)879-7898
Client : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Droject: BANDORE
Sample Name Type
88515 Rock 88516 Rock 88518 Rock 88519 Rock 88521 Rock
88522 Rock
6 Samples Out: Aug 08 j 2003 Page 1 of 1 6-Rock [121615:04:49:30080803:001] In : Aug 01. 2003 Section 1 of 2
Au Ag Cu Pb Zn As Sb Hg Mo Tl Bi Cd Co Ni Ba W Cr V Mn ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm
334 1.0 26 9 414 ^ <5 ^ 2 ^0 <2 <0.2 7 4 95 ^ 56 15 453 llm 30.5 105 49 491 ^ ^ *3 2 ^0 <2 ^.2 7 4 43 ^5 55 8 529
5260 11.2 59 10 171 ^ ^ <3 2 ^0 <2 *0.2 5 *1 59 <5 32 8 449 2770 9.2 132 4 374 *5 ^ <3 2 ^0 <2 -^0.2 7 2 49 ^ 58 11 503 1630 4.2 112 13 1877 ^ ^ <3 1 <10 ^ 2.9 9 7 70 ^ 47 11 539
44 0.4 44 3 62 ^ ^ <3 2 <10 <2 ^0.2 14 27 37 <5 54 7 840
**
Minimum Detection 2 0.1 l 2 l 5 5 3 l 10Maximum Detection 10000 100.0 10000 10000 10000 10000 2000 10000 1000 1000Method FA/AAS ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP "No Test Ins^nsufficienl Sample De^Delay Max=No Estimate Rec=RcCheek m=xlOOO "/^Estimate "/r. NS^No Sample
2 0.2 l l 22000 2000.0, 10000 10000 10000ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP
51111000 10000 10000 10000ICP ICP ICP ICP
ONTMIO MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES
Work Report Summary
Transaction No: W0340.01495 Status: APPROVED
Recording Date: 2003-SEP-19 Work Done from: 2003-JUL-26
Approval Date: 2003-OCT-20 to: 2003-SEP-03
Client(s):215879 BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.
Survey Type(s):ASSAY GCHEM
Work Report Details:
Claim#
G
G
G
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
4000456
4000467
4040013
614741
614742
614743
614744
614745
614746
614747
614748
1187494
Perform
31,482
31,483
S988
SO
S989
30
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
5988
S5.930
External Credits:
Perform Approve
S1.482
S1.483
S988
SO
S989
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
S988
S5.930
SO
AppliedSO
soso
5400
S400
S400
S400
S400
S400
S400
S400
S800
54,000
Applied Approve
SO
soSO
S400
S400
S400
S400
S400
5400
5400
5400
5800
S4.000
Assign
S 1,482
S 1,483
5988
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
53,953
Assign Approve
1,482
1,483
988
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
53,953
Reserve
SO
sosoSO
S965
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
S965
S1.930
Reserve Approve
SO
sososo
S965
50
SO
SO
SO
soSO
S965
S1.930
Due Date
2004-NOV-09
2004-NOV-09
2004-NOV-09
2004-NOV-09
2004-NOV-09
2004-NOV-09
2004-NOV-09
2005-NOV-09
2005-OCT-01
Reserve:S1 ,930 Reserve of Work
S1.930 Total Remaining
Report#: W0340.01495
Status of claim is based on information currently on record.
52B09NE2009 2.26332 CONACHER 900
2003-Oct-24 14:12 Armstrong-d Page 1 of 1
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Date: 2003-OCT-20
Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE 933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 6B5
BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD. 1115 SUTTON DRIVE, SUITE 200 BURLINGTON, ONTARIO L7L 5Z8 CANADA
Tel: (888) 415-9845 Fax:(877)670-1555
Dear Sir or Madam
Submission Number: 2.26332 Transaction Number(s): W0340.01495
Subject: Approval of Assessment Work
We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.
At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.
The revisions outlined in the Notice dated September 22, 2003 have been corrected. Accordingly, assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the Declaration of Assessment Work Form that accompanied this submission.
If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact BRUCE GATES by email at [email protected] or by phone at (705) 670-5856.
Yours Sincerely,
Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section
Cc: Resident Geologist
Robert Leo Duess (Agent)
Band-Ore Resources Ltd. (Assessment Office)
Assessment File Library
Band-Ore Resources Ltd. (Claim Holder)
Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page: 1 Correspondence 10:18781
ON1MUOCANADAMining Land Tenure
Map
m 10O)
o o
O
l
K) O O
71700fJE 718000E 71900CS 720000E 721000E
UTM Zano 1& JODOm flftf
Date ? Time of ll*ut: Mon Od 20 15:04:29 EOT 2003
TOWNSHIP l AREA PLAN CONACHER G-0646
ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS l DIVISIONS
Mining Division Thunder BayLand Titles/Registry Division THUNDER BAYMinistry of Natural Resources District THUNDER BAY
TOPOGRAPHIC Land TenureFtoMXKtl SatoM
['2,'j HWw"*. tSRf
[S] •~.*
rg w
[i "*"B3 -LS "-[SI **
HH "-
: ••n*^*
m
t^/^iWSl •'j
LAND TENURE WITHDRAWALS
IMPORTANT NOTICiS
LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRIPTIONS
**rr JifH.SWHw* Jw!,*J0iWi Ml.'wt
"" "fi RtSHtI ONLY WITK*!**t4 CNOM DTAKIHft OMUBH W-TB-1MJ" SEC ' 1 91BJI!rlVATW*l#ri(ftM(
2.26332 GCHEM ASSAY
General Information and Limitations
Area of Main Zone
\Mafic Volcanics
tJvj'W//28^. \
AMafic Volcanics
, ;̂;.'" PORPHYRY
Intermediate VoTcanics
N6.2 Grid
Intermediate l Volcanics
No.4 Zone OREOUEST
Band-Ore Resources Ltd.SHEBANDOWAN LAKE PROPERTY
Conacher Township G 646
Geological Compilation
52B09NE2009 2.26332 CONACHER 210
General Notes:Exposed area consists entirely of feldspar porphyry. Rock for the most part is massive to weakly sheared, weakly altered with well preserved porphyritic textures. More intensely sheared and altered (carbonate sericite) zones do occur and are best exposed in the west part of the trench. Sulphide mineralization is erratic, and is generally confined to sheared and altered sections, where up to 107D pyrite mineralization occurs. Several samples of trie mineral were collected returned values of up to 0.604 oz Au/ton.
LEGEND
x
54
SAMPLE NUMr3ER (401) XX
Trench Plan Trench Ascale 1:500
O 5 10 15m
SCALE
75 72
covered
pyrite(gossanous)
66 TO 70
Shear Zone (locally gossanous * mineralization)
VIEW LOOKING EAST
VIEW LOOKING WEST
trencc-a.cdr Jan.5/00
Band-Ore Resources Ltd.
SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY Conacher Township
Fig. 5
?Sampling Results Results given in oz Au/ton
Sample
4015140152401534015440155401564015740155401594016040161401624016340164401654016640167 4016S401694017040171401724017340174
Result0.0410.019O.2240.0450.0160.1560.0790.3700.0690.0050.0450.0110.013O.OO10.0010.0040.3010.5490.1400.1260.229O.5O40.0520.019
toCOo
General Notes:Exposed rock in trenched area consisted entirely of porphyry, weathered white to light grey in colour. Texture varies with deformation and alteration, i.e., from
relatively massive and weakly altered to strongly altered - carbonate and sericite and strong to intensely deformed - sheared and schistose, Sericite carbonate schist is well developed in strongly sheared section with only occasional remnant porphyry textures present if any at all. Sulphide mineralization is generally sparse, with the exception of occasional narrow sulphide seams parallel to foiiation and shearing, Shearing - schistosity is slightly variable at 900 and dip is vertical to steep to the north.
Trench Plan^Trench B
scale 1:500N
massive section
Sampling Results Results given in oz Au/ton
Sample
4017540176401774O176401794010040151401624O1634O164401654O1664O1674016040189401904019140192
Result
cO.OOI< 0.001^.OO1^.OO1*:0.001•cO.OOl•cO.001O.OO60.1770.002^.OO1^.OO10.34O^.001*:0.001O.OO1O.O03O.OO2
LEGEND
61- SAMFLE NUMBER (4O1) XX
Highly variably from weakly to strongly sheared
1.2m wide strong shear - fault22 - 23mSRelatively massive section
0.6m wide strong sk
Gradatlonal contact23 -49mSModerately to strongly sheared - schistose with occasionalnarrow seams (Vtcm) or rusty sulphides,
8)
narrow sulphide seam
49 -54m5Relatively massive to weakly sheared, weakly sericitic and weakcarbonate alteration.
72 -SOmSStrongly sheared section. Sericite carbonate schistsjocallyrusty and mineralized with up to 170 pyrite.
TRENCHE-BCDR Jan.5/00
&0-
Weakly sheared, weakly to moderate sericite altered section.Trace sulphide mineralization.
Band-Ore Resources Ltd. SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
Conacher Township Fig. 6
^ — — ̂
- ———— - — ̂
ar - fault\^
-•s- *.
occasional^^^
21(1m)^^Vearn ^d^
ovb
itic and weak
istsjocally
s seams"^ed section. ^^
'\
ovb
— *-
65 0*
~ ~^-~~
wate—x-—
^-'
^
water
|jssrv^^r*t^.^
x
-— ̂ ^
x —
se 0
-- — —
ovb
x-r^'x —
x —---X-— .-.x.-•H—
ovl?
— 5m
- 10m
- 20m
^
^^^— ̂ ^"
- 40m~^^^--^
^^^^^^—
— 60m
- SOm
- 69m iow lying area
91,92
90
67665=5
636462
60
797677
7675
15m
View of Trench B Looking North
Sample 401#3:narrow sulphide seam in sheared and intensely sericite and carbonate altered porphyry, this sample returned a value of 0.177 oz Au per ton.
Sample 40193: 0.6 metre wide shear zone- intensely sheared porphyryr altered to sericitecarbonate schist. Very 0radational contacts
LLlOCM tO
5390215NView of Trench 5 Looking South
to w o .~
52B09NE2009 2.26332 CONACHER 240Trench Plan
Trench Dscale NTS
LU O (O
N̂
5390245N
Filled in overburdentrench?
Grab samples742-174S2742-374547405743674S7
5m
2-3m deep ^ filled with water
grab
Photograph showing horizontal exposure of sheared and altered porphyry (sericite carbonate schist). Schist is rusty and variably mineralized with pyrite and occasional flecks of green mica. Note bottom of trench filled with water.
Photograph of rusty mineralized schist on vertical face, looking east. Grab samples collected from this location returned values up to O.941 oz Au per ton. Zone is poorly exposed in this location.
N
TRENCHES.CDR Jan.^OQ
Strongly sheared rusty schi&t mineralized with 2-570 disseminated pyrite (along east wall)
Band-Ore Resources Ltd, SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY
Conacher Township Fig. 8
Sampling Results Results given in oz Au/ton
Sample
7451745274537454745574567457
Result0.1430.941O.3240.0140.3540.012O.O1O