52B09NE2009 2.26332 CONACHER 010

ASSESSMENT REPORT

ON THE

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

CONACHER TOWNSHIP

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION ONTARIO

FOR

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

G. Cavey, P.Geo.

Sept 3, 2003

RECEIVEDSEP 1 9 2003

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT _____OFFICE______

OREQUEST

l TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents ................................................................................................................iIntroduction..........................................................................................................................!Property Description, Location, Access and Physiography .................................................lHistory and Previous Work .................................................................................................3Geology...............................................................................................................................^

Regional Geology.....................................................................................................5Property Geology .....................................................................................................5Mineralization.........................................................................................................^

2003 Exploration ................................................................................................................,8Soil Geochemistry....................................................................................................8Rock Sampling.........................................................................................................9

Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................................12Qualifications - George Cavey, P.Geo...............................................................................14References..........................................................................................................................15

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure l Location Map Following Page lFigure 2 Claim Map Following Page lFigure 3 Regional Geology Following Page 5Figure 4 Property Geology Following Page 5Figure 5 Soil Geochemistry -Au Grid #1 Following Page 8Figure 6 Soil Geochemistry -Au Grid #4 Following Page 8Figure 7 Soil Geochemistry -Cu Grid #1 Following Page 9Figure 8 Soil Geochemistry -Cu Grid #4 Following Page 9

LIST OF TABLES

Table I Claim Status 2Table II 2003 Sample Summary 10Table in 1984 Noranda Main Zone Trench Assays 11Table IV Metallic Screen Analysis vs. Fire Assay 12

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix I 1999 Band-Ore Sample Results 18Appendix n iPL Analytical Results 20Appendix in iPL Procedures 25

INTRODUCTIONThis report presents a summary of recent geochemical work completed on of the

Shebandowan Property owned by Band-Ore Resources Ltd. It is prepared by Orequest Consultants Ltd. The information herein is derived from a review of the documents listed in the References and from information provided by Band-Ore. The field was competed between July 26-29, 2003.

The property is located west of Thunder Bay, Ontario (Figure 1), in the Matawin Gold Belt, a 75 km long, six kilometre wide geological structure that contains more than 75 gold occurrences. Gold mineralization shows a close spatial association between the Timiskaming type porphyry intrusives in contact with Archean greenstones.

The author of this report is familiar with the subject matter covering the preceding and intervening years and the current publicly available body of data. OreQuest Consultants has worked on a number of gold exploration properties in the Shebandowan area from 1983-1990. The author has written two technical reports in whole or in part for Band-Ore on the subject property hi 1993 and 1996.

All reference to currency in this report is in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. All historic gold assays from the Band-Ore property exploration programs from 1937-1990 were reported in ounces per ton (oz/ton) which have commonly been converted to grams per tonne (g/t) in this report. Technical reports from 1984-1990 contain analyses in both formats although all fire analyses were completed in grams per tonne (g/t).

At the time of the property visits, the Thunder Bay mineral records indicated that all the unpatented claims were in good standing although assessment work is required prior to Oct l, 2003 to keep them in good standing. The work to keep the claims in good standing was completed in Aug 2003 but has not yet been filed for assessment purposes. In addition, the land registry office has indicated that the patented claims and mineral lease where also in good standing.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, ACCESS AND PHYSIOGRAPHYThe property consists of 16 patented claims, one mining lease and 11 unpatented mining

claims, located in Conacher Township within the Thunder Bay Mining division (Figure 2).

A complete list of claim numbers and expiry dates is listed in Table I.

N

A

MONTREAL

Lake Ontario U.S.A.

OREQUESTO 100 200 300 400km BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Figure 1

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

LOCATION MAPOntario

NTS 52B/9

SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3

5390000

5 389 000 C

OREQUESTLower Shebandowan Lake

500 1000 1500

SCALE

Shebandowan Lake Management Plan (RAO)

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Figure 2

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

CLAIM MAPOntario

NTS 52B/9

SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3

TABLE I; CLAIM STATUS

Claim NumberUnpatentedTB 11 87494TB 614741-614749TB964523

TotalPatentedTB533943TB 17221TB21966TB22147TB26533-535TB26547TB26539TB26953-954TB27924TB28019TB28089-092

Total

Acres

4036040

440*

41.9838.7935.9448.05111.8852.7137.6182.0330.6154.67

221.67755.94

No of Claims

191

11

1111311211417

Recording Date

Ol-Oct-0109-Nov-Sl10-Feb-87

Expiry Dates

Ol-Oct-0309-Nov-0310-Feb-05

LeasedPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatentPatent

* - All Ontario unpatented claims are theoretically 40 acres (16 ha) in size, but in reality rarely are exactly 40 acres in size. Exact acreage is not known until the claims are legally surveyed.

The unpatented claims (11 claims) are currently in good standing as per the list in Table I. The unpatented Band-Ore claims are currently in good standing although 10 of the claims require assessment work prior to Oct l, 2003 and Nov 3, 2003 to keep them in good standing beyond their current expiry dates. The work to keep the claims in good standing was completed in July 2003 and summarized in this report. Upon approval of the assessment work, the 10 claims will be in good standing until Oct l, 2004 and Nov 3, 2004.

There are no known environmental liabilities either on the patented or unpatented claims which are the subject of this report. The author is not aware of any unusual permit requirements for the claims during the early exploration phases other standard permitting for any issues related to road bed improvements or stream bed crossings. Such permits are generally easily obtained. There are no known native land title issues in this area.

Parts of some of the claims lie within the "Shebandowan Lake Management Plan (SLMP)" which has been set up to '"balance the sustainable use of natural resources with the protection and enhancement of the natural ecosystems". The SLMP has been set up by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and applies to public lands such as crown land held in unpatented mineral claims. Portions of some of the unpatented claims will be affected by a "Restricted Area Order (RAO) which includes Shebandowan Lake and the immediate shoreline area for 300m inland of the lake. Exploration and mining are not affected but the normal permits related to streambeds will be required, for any work within the RAO. Portions of the No. 4 Zone and any extensions either west or

east of the zone may be within the RAO. The RAO does not apply to subsurface work. Figure 2 shows the extent of the RAO and indicates which portions of the claims lie within the RAO.

The Shebandowan property is located on the north shore of Shebandowan Lake, approximately two kilometres west of Shebandowan and 80 kilometres west of Thunder Bay, Ontario (Figure 1). Approximately 10 kilometers to the southwest of the property is Inco's recently shut down, Shebandowan Ni-Cu Mine.

The Trans Canada Highway (Highway 11) crosses the northern half of the property. Several bush roads branch off the highway providing access to both the cottage lots along the north shore of Shebandowan Lake and to most of the property. The property is also traversed by the C.N.R. railway and two transmission power lines. All essential services such as food and lodging are available in from the mining city of Thunder Bay including all heavy-duty equipment. Regular, daily scheduled airline companies including Air Canada, West Jet and Bearskin Airways service Thunder Bay.

Topography relief on the Shebandowan property is low and undulating with elevation not exceeding 100 feet. The Swamp River crosses the eastern half of the property and flows into Shebandowan Lake. Bedrock exposure is generally poor and glacial cover is abundant in places.

Vegetation on the property is typical of most areas of northwestern Ontario. Much of the property is covered by swamp with stunted black spruce, larch, alder, and labrador tea growing from thick mats of lichen and moss. As elevation increases and drainage improves larger black and white spruce, jack pine, birch and aspen are common. One and possibly two generations of timber have been cut from some portions of the property and there are recreational cottage lots along the north shore of Shebandowan Lake.

Precipitation for the region is low to moderate. Winters can be extremely cold (-30 to -40 degrees celsius), for periods of several weeks, but temperatures usually average -10 to -20 degrees celsius over the entire winter. Snow accumulations vary from year to year with 100 to 200 centimetres of accumulation being common especially in wooded areas. Shebandowan Lake can begin to freeze over in early December and break up in mid to late April. Summers are often hot and dry with temperatures often reaching the 250 C to 300 C range. Periodic heavy rain and thunderstorms are common during the summer months. Exploration can take place year round with minor breaks during the spring thaw and winter freeze up.

HISTORY AND PREVIOUS WORKGold was first discovered on the original Bandolac property in 1937. In 1939, the Rochon-

Maney Mining Syndicate sold the property to the Bandolac Mining Company.

The original showing, exposed in 11 trenches, consists of a zone 7.2 feet wide by 400 feet long over which channel sample assays averaged 0.247 oz/ton gold. In 1940, Bandolac Mining Company completed 500 feet of drilling in seven short holes on the East Zone. It is reported that the nine intersections encountered averaged 0.21 oz/ton gold over 5.5 feet (Crosscombe, 1947). In 1944, a total of 13,382 feet of drilling was completed in 30 holes on the East Zone. The historic reports do not state if samples collected over disclosed vein widths represent true widths. During this same year

Auband Mines Ltd. acquired the ground west of the Bandolac property and completed 10,121 feet of drilling in 19 holes on the West Zone (the western extension of Bandolac's East Zone). During the war years, the company announced, on a number of occasions, preparation for shaft sinking and underground work. There are no records in the assessment files to indicate that this work was actually completed likely due to the effects of World War n on manpower and other resources. In 1945, Freeport Exploration Company leased both the Bandolac and Auband properties and completed a self-potential survey over the porphyry that hosts the East and West Zones. In addition, Freeport completed 5,057 feet of drilling in seven holes.

In 1946, Band-Ore Gold Mines Limited was incorporated to take over Auband Mines Limited. Band-Ore Gold Mines completed 7,694 feet of drilling in 7 holes, and were successful in defining the East Zone gold bearing structure over a strike length of 4,800 feet. In the same year Band Ore Gold Mines Ltd. took over the property and assets of the Bandolac Mining Company Limited. The East and West Zones were now part of one property controlled by Band Ore Gold Mines Ltd. In 1947, a report was prepared for Band-Ore stating a tonnage estimate of 687,400 tons to the 500 foot level averaging 0.265 oz/ton gold (estimate not to the required standards of NI43- 101). This estimate was arrived at by combining the reserves of five separate zones named A to E, which represent the former East and West Zones and now combined, make up the present day Main Zone. The Main Zone has also been called the No. l Zone by certain authors, for the purposes of this report the zone will be referred to as the Main Zone. The drill logs have not been located for any of the 1944-46 drilling.

No significant work was reported to have occurred on the property from 1947 until 1974 with the exception of a small drill program completed in 1966. A Mr. John Anderson who drilled three holes (170m) from the shores of Shebandowan Lake completed the drill program. Anderson reported intersecting sections of well mineralized core but no assay results were contained in the assessment file. Bonnacord Explorations Ltd. optioned the property from Band-Ore in 1974 and conducted a bulk sampling program on the Main Zone in 1974, the results of which were subsequently lost.

On September l, 1980 Mattagami Lake Exploration optioned the Band-Ore property. In the fall of 1980, 50.9 kilometres of linecutting, VLF, magnetometer and I.P. surveys were completed. Seven drill holes (BO-80-1 to 7) totaling 1125.6 metres were drilled to verify the presence of the five auriferous zones A-E. The best intersections included 1.2 metres of 0.235 oz/ton gold (BO-80-2), and 1.63 metres of 0.133 oz/ton gold (BO-80-7), true widths are unknown. A selected number of intercepts from various drill programs on the Main Zone have been included in Appendix I. In addition to geological work and IP surveys, Mattagami completed a program of drilling. Based on the earlier 1940's Main Zone drilling, Watts, Griffis and McQuat, in 1980, estimated a reserve of approximately 705,000 tonnes grading 6.86 g/t gold above the 500 foot level.

During the fall of 1981 the No. 4 Zone was discovered by drilling some of the IP anomalies peripheral to the anomaly coincident with the Main Zone. The No.4 Zone lies approximately 800 metres southwest of the Main Zone and does not outcrop due to thick glacial till cover. During the summer of 1982 Mattagami completed 21 drill holes totaling 3512.2 metres on the No. 4 Zone (BO- 82 holes). The No. 4 Zone was tested over a strike length of 500 metres and to a vertical depth of 200 metres. The drilling determined that the zone consists of three sub-parallel zones referred to by

Mattagami as the Telluride, Upper and Lower Zones. Possible geological reserves for these three zones were calculated by Noranda to be approximately 616,000 tonnes of 4.83 g/t gold and 7.71 g/t silver. The western extension of the No. 4 Zone lies outside the present day claim block, although much of the defined mineralized material lies with the Band-Ore property.

From 1984 to 1990 Noranda trenched a portion of the Main Zone and several of the I.P. conductors on the property. During this period of time Noranda Exploration drilled 18 drill holes totaling 3,639 metres on both the No. 4 zone and the Main Zone. In 1991 Noranda transferred its interest to Hemlo Gold Mines. Hemlo Gold Mines terminated the option later that year and returned the property to Band-Ore Resources Ltd. Noranda spent approximately 51,100,000 between 1980- 1991 on the property.

hi 1995, Band-Ore completed a one hole (698 ft-212.75 meter) drill program on claim TB614747 in the central portion of the property. This hole was drilled to examine the stratigraphy in an area with little or no outcrop. The hole was designed to test the geological contact between intermediate to mafic volcanics and the felsic to intermediate tuffs which host the No. 4 Zone approximately one kilometre to the west. The hole, S-95-1, intersected 318.5 ft (97 meters) of intermediate to mafic tuffs predominately consisting of ash to lapilli tuffs. The tuffs are in contact with a 163.2 ft (47.7 meter) thick agglomerate unit, which in turn is in contact with a 69.3 ft (21.1 meter) felsic tuff, a part of the felsic -intermediate volcanic unit. The hole did determine that the favorable horizon existed at depth but was unsuccessful in discovering any new mineralization in this area. No gold analysis higher than 0.01 oz/ton were detected.

Band-Ore also completed a prospecting, sampling program in the fall of 2000 over the area of the Main Zone. Further detail of this work is contained in the "Exploration" section of this report.

GEOLOGY Regional Geology

The Shebandowan Lakes area contains east trending mafic to intermediate metavolcanics consisting of basalt, andesite, and dacite flows and tuffs with minor felsic volcaniclastics and metasediments underlies the Shebandowan Lake area. Gabbro, peridotite and feldspar (+A- quartz) porphyry sills and plugs (Figure 3) intrude the metavolcanics. Mafic intrusives referred to as gabbro and peridotite by Mattagami have been described as meta-diabase by Chorlton. A large quartz diorite stock underlies Lower Shebandowan Lake.

In 1994 government geologists first coined the term "Matawin Gold Belt (MGB)" to describe the 75 km long, six kilometre wide geological structure that contains more than 75 gold occurrences including the Band-Ore occurrences. Gold mineralization in the MGB shows a close spatial association between the Timiskaming type alkalic metavolcanics and intrusives and intrusives in contact with Archean greenstones and metasedimentary units.

Property GeologyThe property is underlain mainly by intermediate to mafic metavolcanic rocks with lesser

felsic volcaniclastic rocks, gabbro and feldspar porphyry sills (Figure 4). The metavolcanic sequence

QueticoMetasedimentary

Superbelt

N

Northerniaht Gneiss

TerrainLEGEND

B Gold Occurrence

Metasediments and Pyroclastic Rocks

Gabbro, Anorthosite

Late to Post-Tectonic Plutons

Mafic, Ultramafic Metevolcanics; Locally Intrusive Bodies

Felsic Metavolcanics; Altered Fissile Metavolcanics of Mafic- Intermediate Composition

OREQUEST

Oe e

Fault

Pistol Lake

Inco-Shebandowan Mine

Narrows

Ol

10kml adapted from

Stott and Schnieders, 1983

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Figure 3

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

REGIONAL GEOLOGYOntario

NTS 52B/9

SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3

5 391 000 N

Shebandowan Lake Management Plan (RAO)

after Band-Ore; Duess 2000

OREQUESTBAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Figure 4

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

PROPERTY GEOLOGYOntario

NTS 52B/9

SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3

is in contact with the Shebandowan Lake quartz diorite stock, which lies south of the property."

Metavolcanic rocks on the property are east west trending and dip steeply to the north.

The intermediate to mafic metavolcanics consists of andesite and dacite flows, tuffs, breccias

and agglomerates. A barren iron formation interbedded with dacitic flows is reported in the 1980

drilling. The felsic metavolcanic rocks are comprised of serialized and pyritized rhyolite tuffs and

felsic fragmentals. The No. 4 Zone is hosted within a quartz-carbonate veined shear zone within

sheared felsic volcanics in the southern half of the property.

Felsic intrusives on the property include an outcrop of syenite approximately 300 metres

north of Blizzard Bay and the feldspar porphyry sill, which hosts the Main Zone. The feldspar

porphyry has been intensely sheared locally, where it appears as a sericite schist with no apparent

phenocryst phase and a higher than average pyrite concentration. Mafic intrusives on the property

are mainly gabbroic sills with some peridotite noted. Contacts with the hosting metavolcanics are

conformable, chloritized and sharp.

The metavolcanics underlying the property lie on the north limb of a large isoclinal anticline.

Top determinations from pillowed flows in the general area indicates that the sequence is north

facing (Huska, 1981). Three north trending faults are noted on the property, two of these east of the

Swamp River have displaced gabbro sills as much as 100 metres on surface. The intensity of

schistosity within the metavolcanics and porphyry is variable and for the most part east-west striking

and sub-vertical. Sinistral shearing within the feldspar porphyry unit is most intense along trends

parallel with local well developed schistosity. Foliation and fracture patterns observed on the

property are likely associated with the emplacement of the Shebandowan Lake quartz diorite stock.

MineralizationTwo distinct types of mineral occurrences have been identified on the Band-Ore property.

The Main Zone (No. l Zone), discovered in 1937, consists of sheared and altered porphyry with

disseminated and stringer pyrite mineralization. The No. 4 Zone consists of blue-grey quartz veining

hosted in sheared and altered felsic to intermediate pyroclastics. The host rocks consist of

intermediate to mafic metavolcanics are mainly comprised of well-foliated andesite and dacite flows,

tuffs, breccias and agglomerates. To the north of this sequence lies the Postan Fault which marks the

contact between the metavolcanics and the northern metasedimentary Quetico subprovince. To the

south of the property is the Mabella Fault and associated Timiskaming-type sediments. Gold

mineralization in the area is associated with sulphide bearing veins and pyritic stringers in sheared

metavolcanic rocks and sheared felsic porphyry sills and plugs.

Pyrite occurs as fine disseminations and massive pods within mafic breccias and

agglomerates. Noranda reported that their highest assay from this type of occurrence was 0.013

oz/ton gold, 0.15 oz/ton silver, and Q.04% copper. Trenching of an LP. anomaly approximately 300

metres northeast of the Main Zone, within a sheared sericitic/chloritic intermediate to mafic

metavolcanic, returned a result of 0.16 oz/ton gold across two metres (true width unknown). There

is no further description of this showing, however the showing seems to indicate the presence of

significant gold mineralization within the intermediate to mafic metavolcanics. In 1989 a total of 15

trenches were excavated to test I.P. anomalies outside the drilled areas. Most of the trenches

exposed sericite-chlorite schists; the best assay returned was 0.214 oz/ton gold from a grab sample

although many of the samples returned lower grades.

Disseminated pyrite and pyritic lenses occur within the sheared and altered feldspar porphyry

in the Main (No.l) Zone. Concentrations of disseminated pyrite are higher in sericitized zones (1-

20/*)) in semi-massive discontinuous lenses. Sampling of drill core indicates that gold values greater

than 0.1 oz/ton occur only within seriticized zones with appreciable amounts of pyrite (Huska, 1981).

In 1984 Noranda Exploration stripped the Main Zone exposing an area 120 metres by 10 metres.

Noranda collected 107 diamond saw cut channel samples from the exposed outcrop, only eight

samples returned values greater than 0.08 oz/ton Au. The highest values were 0.56 and 0.74 oz/ton

Au. Sample widths were typically 0.50m, but final trench maps are missing from the assessment

records so the actual sample widths and locations are not known. Noranda felt that because of the

lack of continuity in mineralization on surface and in previous drilling, no further work would be

required (Bellinger, 1992).

The most abundant sulphide noted from surface work by Mattagami and Noranda was pyrite,

minor chalcopyrite associated with quartz veining was noted in drilling by Noranda. Clayton (1980)

reports the occurrence of sphalerite and chalcopyrite within rusty shear zones. The highest base

metal assay, reported from historic work on the property is from a grab sample which assayed Q.3%

copper and 4.4*^ zinc (Crosscombe, 1947). Base metals were not routinely tested by any of the past

explorationists so the 1947 assays cannot be considered indicative of base metal mineralization on

the property. The highest precious metal results came from a grab sample, which returned a value of

15.7 oz/ton gold and 43.6 oz/ton silver. Precious metal values of this magnitude are not considered

indicative of the mineralization at the Main Zone; assays do not normally exceed 1.0 oz/ton Au or

Ag. Channel samples from the original trenches collected in 1947 on the Main Zone averaged 0.35

oz/ton gold over a true width of 7 feet and a strike length of 400 feet (Crosscombe, 1947). Locations

for these samples were reportedly "imprecise at best; in some cases locations are not given"

(Clayton, 1980).

No. 4 Zone gold mineralization occurs in structurally controlled quartz veins; quartz flooded

zones and silicified pyritic tuffs. All mineralized zones exhibit some degree of silicification, quartz

veining or quartz stockwork and are associated with disseminated pyrite. Ankerite alteration is

abundant and forms a broad halo around the gold bearing zones. Fine-grained specks of tourmaline

are common in the No.4 Zone, but it does not show preferential association with the gold

mineralization. The No. 4 Zone is comprised of three sub-zones termed the Telluride, Upper and

Lower Zones, and is hosted by sheared and altered felsic to intermediate pyroclastics. All three of the

mineralized zones are associated with quartz veins including:

a) hydrothermal veins- beige to creamy white, competent containing banded pyrite mineralization, generally low silver and gold values.

b) Bluish grey to grey pyritiferous veins- grey in colour, competent, generally contains the

best gold values.c) Light greenish-grey veins- not common, competent and carry good gold values.d) White quartz veins- weakly mineralized, narrow ^lcm in width) and contain good values

8

2003 EXPLORATIONMost of the previous exploration work completed on the property was done from 1937-90

and has been discussed hi the "History" section of this report. The only recent work completed on the property was a lone diamond drill hole in 1995 in the southeast corner of the property followed by a trench sampling program completed in the fall of 1999 (Duess 2000). Both of these programs were conducted by Band-Ore and were assessment work to maintain tenure of the unpatented claims. Band-Ore collected 119 grab samples from old pre-existing trenches excavated by Noranda from their work in the 80's located on and around the Main Zone. In addition, the company collected another 45 prospecting rock grab samples from various locations within the claim block.

Many of the old trenches contain visible diamond saw cuts, presumably the result of Noranda collecting channel samples. The authors have been unable to find maps relating individual samples to specific sample cuts in the trenches. Of the 164 samples collected by Band-Ore in 1999, 26 returned values above l gram per tonne. The highest result was 32.2 g/t Au with most samples containing only trace values of gold. Most of the higher-grade samples came from Trenches "A", "B" or "D". A complete list of the 2000 Duess sample results from Trenches A, B, and D can be located in Appendix I.

The 1995 drill core is the only core on the property that is intact and labelled however no significant mineralization was intersected in this hole. The grab samples collected from the trenches in 1999 were successful in establishing the presence of gold within small pyritic lenses within the sheared feldspar porphyry of the main zone.

Soil GeochemistryNoranda using the standard technique of collecting a "B" horizon sample approximately 15-

20cm below the surface completed previous soil sampling surveys. The Noranda surveys found that typically that copper geochemical anomalies were located along road or old trails so felt that these results were likely contaminated. Noranda concluded:

"Difficulties in obtaining a consistent sample and soil contamination would appear to be contributing factors resulting in the ineffectiveness of this survey. A more effective geochemical technique may involve basal till sampling where the effects of topography and soil contamination would be minimal".

In 2003, in an attempt to determine if a different approach to soil geochemistry could be used to examine the many IP anomalies on the property, Band-Ore decided to complete two soil profile test grids over the Main and No.4 Zones. Five lines, 100 m in length and 100m apart were placed over each zone of interest, al total of 0.5km of lines per grid. Three pits where dug at 50m spacing along each line with a sample collected at approximately 30cm depth and a second sample collected at 60cm depth. The pits were completed using a combination of grub hoes, metal pry bars and hand gardening trowels. A total of 14 sample sites were completed on the Main Zone (Figures 5 and 7) and 15 sites over the No.4 Zone sample (Figures 6 and 8), all sample sites were located with a compass and hipchain and were recorded with a OPS.

1L1+OOE 1L2+OOE 1L3+OOE 1L4+OOE 1L5+OOE

100N

SON

LO+00, <2 1289,163 l

SOS4^2

100S<2, 2

<2,4

2,12

<2

L , <2

<2

, <2

<2,317

<2,34

OREQUEST

A sample Au ppb, B sample Au ppb

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Figure 5

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Au GRID #1

Ontario NTS 52B/9

SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3

.. ...V ..; ^ ,'* O***j , "r V-* ;^

4LO+OOE 4L1+OOE 4L2+OOE 4L3+OOE 4L4+OOE

100N

SON. <2

LO+00, <2

<2'

, <2

SOS^^2,10 ( ^2,

100S

150S

, <2

A sample Au ppb, B sample Au ppb

1^2 L2. <2

(l, <2

l-

OREQUESTBAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Figure 6

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Au GRID #4

Ontario NTS 52B/9

SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3

In general, samples collected at the 15-30 cm depth consisted of uniform coloured, orange- brown to brown, soil. A marked difference exists from the samples collected at the 50-60cm depth. Samples were orange-brown to brown or grey- brown and much coarser often containing abundant sand. Samples were collected in kraft paper sample bags labelled and sent to iPL Labs in Vancouver for ICP analysis, (Au with an AA finish). The 30 cm sample was collected from the "B" horizon, while it appeared that the 60cm depth encountered a transitional horizon between the "B" and "C" horizon. Full details on the analytical procedures used by iPL Labs have been included in Appendix III of this report.

Two of the planned sample sites over the Main Zone, Grid l, were located in swamps so no sample was collected at the predetermined site. Instead, samples were collected as close to the planned site as possible and were numbered accordingly. These sites were, Line 4E, Station 0+80S and Line 5E, Station 0+85S. All other sample collected from sites from both grids were dry, water was not a problem. Regionally, the terrain in the area of the No.4 Zone tends to contain abundant swamps or wet ground, which may hamper future sampling over a broader area centred on the No.4 Zone. The Main Zone sits on a prominent ridge, likely due to the siliceous component of the underling porphyry. Samples site located over the Main Zone porphyry were fairly easy to obtain, but as the sampling proceeded to the south, the wet ground surrounding the No.4 Zone was encountered which made the soil sampling more difficult.

In summary, results of the 2003 soil sampling indicated that of the 29 sites where two samples were collected from the two different depths 21 sites contained no detectable gold values (Figures 5 and 6). Five of the sites contained increases in gold values from the deeper sample, while three sites showed the sample collected from the upper sample returning a higher value than the deeper sample. Statistical analysis to determine background and anomalous values for the limited database was not completed since the database was too small to provide any meaningful statistical conclusions. Further sampling over a broader area and further sampling at greater depths (^ 1m) should be considered to determine if soil sampling at depth can assist in locating areas of gold mineralization.

In all cases, the copper values were higher at depth than from the shallower sample (Figures 7 and 8). The increase in copper values at depth could also be attributed to possible surface contamination due to effects of the nearby Inco Shebandowan Cu-Ni mine. Nickel values were less consistent. No detailed testing has been completed by any Ontario government department to determine if the area shows an increase in copper in the soils due to the effect of the mine. No additional testing for copper or nickel in any future soil sampling is recommended.

Rock SamplingA number of rock samples from the property in order to verify some of the historic data. It

was decided that sampling of some of the structures exposed in the trenches would verify the existence of gold in the structures. Sample sites were selected based on the best grab sample locations of Band-Ore (from trenches located on Figure 4), all from the Main Zone. Table n summarizes the samples in July 2003.

1L1+OOE 1L2+OOE 1L3+OOE 1L4+OOE 1L5+OOE

100N

SON

LO+0029, 53

SOS15,21

100S32,33

i 39,54 123,25 127,34 L27, 33

33,44

28,44

29,81

25,85

12,22

169,263

20,30

21,31

OREQUEST

A sample Cu ppm, B sample Cu ppm

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Figure 7

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Cu GRID #1

Ontario NTS 52B/9

SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3

4LO+OOE 4L1+OOE 4L2+OOE 4L3+OOE 4L4+OOE

100N

SON

LO+00

, 36

, 30

100S

150S

70,139

61,101 l 36. 39 l 12,52

20,31 40,39 120,31 40,39 16,31 28,63

t

l28,43

OREQUEST

A sample Cu ppm, B sample Cu ppm

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Figure 8

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY Cu GRID #4

Ontario NTS 52B/9

SEPTEMBER 2003 XY3

10

TABLE II -2003 SAMPLE SUMMARY

Tag Number

88515

88516

88518

88519

88521

88522

Sample Length

1 metre

1 metre

1 metre

1.4 metre

1 metre

0.5 metre

Band-Ore Trench

A

A

A

D

B

Assay (R/t)

0.33 Au 1.0 Ag

10.65 Au

30.5 Ag

5.26 Au 11.2Ag

2.77 Au 9.2 Ag1.63 Au4.2 Ag0.04 Au 0.4 Ag

Sample Description

Chip sample along Noranda saw cut east end of trench A near Duess sample 40 1 54, consists of feldspar porphyry containing 1 cm shear containing pyrite striking 090 degrees.

Chip sample near middle of trench A near Duess sample 40156, consists of feldspar porphyry containing 5cm vertical shear containing massive pyrite striking 070 degrees.

Chip sample near west end of trench A near Duess sample 40172 consists of feldspar porphyry containing two 5cm vertical shear containing pyrite striking 070 degrees. Sample oriented about 040 degrees

Chip sample across sericite altered shear in porphyry containing abundant pyrite and includes Duess samples 7481 through 7487

Chip sample oriented 000 degrees across very sheared porphyry with rusty sericite near Duess 40187

Pieces of split core from one box at zone 4 dump, very rusty sericite sheared material possibly intermediate volcanics. Hole number and depth unknown.

These rock samples were taken to verify the existence of mineralization, with resultant analytical results being similar to the historic resources mentioned previously in this report. These samples do nothing to verify the tonnage and given the state of the core storage on the property it will be necessary to twin some of the past holes to verify the intersections. The actual location of the old holes may be difficult to determine as only two drill collars were found in the No.4 Zone area and none were seen in the Main Zone. More time in the field may reveal additional hole collars but confirmation of the historic resources will take a substantial amount of work.

Samples 88516 and 88518 were taken across the same shear about 20 meters apart. The shear continued both east and west of the samples but was not continuous throughout Trench A. The average of the two samples is 7.96 g/t Au. There is the possibility that numerous en echelon style mineralized lenses are present within the boundaries of the shear zones causing apparent discontinuity in trenches compared to that seen in the drilling.

All of the rock samples were subject to fire assay with AA finish and 30 element ICP. The results are shown in Appendix II and the iPL analytical procedures are shown in Appendix HI.

In the above samples silver appears to occur with gold in a three to one ratio. Copper values are generally less than 100 ppm. There is one elevated zinc value over G.1% in sample 88521 which also contained 2.7 ppm cadmium (other samples were below detection limit in cadmium). There are no significant quantities of mercury, antimony or arsenic in any of the samples with all results below detection limits.

Most of the historic samples discussed in this report were taken either in the 1980's by Noranda or their wholly owned subsidiary Mattagami Lake Exploration Company Ltd. Noranda used standard techniques for that time, ICP with AA finish for gold analysis and fire assay for core

11

samples. Full details of all the sampling methods and assaying procedures are not available to the authors and this is not uncommon for work in these eras. Some of the old reports contain attached assay certificates, which provide some analytical information. For example, Noranda collected 107 channel samples from the Main Zone trench in 1984. Noranda sent the samples to "Warnock Mersey Professional Services" in Winnipeg for analysis. Warnock analyzed the samples using the one assay ton fire assay method. Seventeen of the samples were sent to "Custom Fire Assaying Ltd." in Cochenour, Ontario for checks although the report contains the results, there is no discussion of the analytical procedures. The following table indicates that Noranda was aware of reproducibility problems with the gold on the Band-Ore property:

TABLE III - 1984 NORANDA MAIN ZONE TRENCH ASSAYS

Sample No1197211973119741197511976119771199011992119931199411995120141201512016120211202212023

Laboratory (all analyses in oz/ton Au)Warnock Mersey

0.030.560.740.020.130.04

Trace0.210.040.01

TraceTrace0.11

Trace0.010.210.01

Custom Fire Assaying0.020.010.260.010.080.04

Trace0.2

0.04TraceTraceTrace0.060.040.020.260.02

Noranda routinely used a 30-gram fire assay technique for gold analysis. Gold values range from 0.01 g/t to samples approaching 34 g/t. Coarse gold may be contributing to the erratic nature of the Noranda results. There is no detailed discussion of abundant visible gold noted but with values of nearly one oz/ton, coarse gold may be a problem, hi 2003, two samples were collect and analyzed with the metallic screen analysis method. In the case of the samples collected, there was not appreciable difference between a conventional fire assay and the metallic screen analysis. The following table summarizes the results of the two samples using the two analytical methods:

12

TABLE IV -METALLIC SCREEN ANALYSIS VS FIRE ASSAY (2003)

Sample Total weight +150M -1SOM Number (grams) (grams) (grams)88517 88520

975.96 1123.2

13.88 962.08 49.96 1073.24

Au+150 Au 150 Metallic Screen Fire Assay g/t g/t Au Total (g/t) Au (g/t)149.55

16.931.05

8.8532.73

9.2133.3

9.7

Certain Noranda drill holes also indicated problems with reproducibility. Noranda used two labs for much of the drill core analysis, a facility in Pamour Ontario and Swastika Laboratories located in Swastika Ontario. Similar swings in assay values between the two labs were also noted from the drilling. Some metallic screen analysis was completed on certain holes and although the reports did not provide the breakdown of the gold distribution between the coarse and fine fractions, the metallic analyses likely provided an indication of the contained gold. Metallic screen analysis should be considered on core and selected trenches to attempt to reduce the effects of irregular distribution of gold in the samples as noted by Noranda.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSThe Shebandowan Property of Band-Ore Resources Ltd. is located along the north shore of

Shebandowan Lake, approximately two kilometers west of the village of Shebandowan, and approximately 80 kilometers west of Thunder Bay. The property lies within the Matawin Gold Belt, a 75 km long, six kilometre wide geological structure that contains more than 75 gold occurrences. Gold mineralization in the Belt shows a close spatial association between the Timiskaming type porphyry intrusives in contact with Archean greenstones.

In 1944-46 drilling outlined a mineralized body named the Main Zone. In 1980, based on the earlier 1940's Main Zone drilling, Watts, Griffis and McQuat, estimated a reserve of approximately 705,000 tonnes grading 6.86 g/t gold above the 500 foot level.

hi 1980 Mattagami Lake Exploration optioned the property and discovered the No.4 Zone mineralized body by drilling IP anomalies. The No. 4 Zone was tested over a strike length of 500 metres and to a vertical depth of 200 metres. Possible geological reserves for these three zones were calculated by Noranda to be approximately 616,000 tonnes of 4.83 g/t gold and 7.71 g/t silver.

To date much work has been performed on the property. A systematic program of drill testing I.P. anomalies was initiated by Mattagami and later carried on by Noranda but never completed. Since a great deal of ground geophysical surveys and geological mapping have already been conducted on the property, the majority of the proposed exploration program will be drill intensive focusing on targets defined by the existing data base. The passing of time has not been friendly to the database. Core is unavailable for re-logging or re-assaying and it may be difficult to orient the previous drill data on the ground.

The two known zones on the property will need to be verified at least in part while other anomalies are investigated. As the recently defined Matawin Gold Belt is more actively explored on other properties, new ideas for exploration targets may present themselves in addition to those already defined by previous operators.

13

After evaluation of the geochemical, geophysical and geological data, many questions regarding the potential of the property remain unanswered. It is recommended that an exploration program of follow up diamond drilling be initiated to test I.P. anomalies beyond the limits of the previous drilling. These areas would include testing the felsic porphyry west of and along strike of the Main zone as well as untested I.P. anomalies within the metavolcanic rocks adjacent to the felsic porphyry. Further sampling over a broader area and further sampling at greater depths ^ 1m) should be considered to determine if soil sampling at depth can assist in locating areas of gold mineralization.

No further work is recommended on the No. 4 Zone at this time. The work program recommended in this report refers to the Main Zone mineralization and possible extensions thereof. The dominant control on mineralization appears to be structural and further drill testing of the porphyry should focus on intersections of structural features oblique to the dominant east trending shearing within the Main Zone porphyry.

The success of I.P. surveys on the property seems to be substantiated by the I.P. targets drilled to date that contains auriferous mineralization. However, many of the I.P. anomalies remain untested. Approximately 1,500 metres of the feldspar porphyry unit west of the Main Zone remains untested by drilling. Coinciding with the western trend of the feldspar porphyry are two I.P. anomalies that are extensions of the anomaly overlying the Main Zone. Due to the absence of outcrop in this area it is recommended that this area be a high priority target for drilling.

Since the Main Zone mineralization has not been tested below the 500 foot level it is recommended that a portion of the proposed drilling test the down dip potential of the Main Zone. Additional holes are recommended to twin several of the old 1944-46 holes to understand the basis of the historic estimates.

14

QUALIFICATIONS

I, George Cavey, of 306-595 Howe Street, Vancouver British Columbia, hereby certify:

1. I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia (1976) and hold a B.Sc. degree in geology.2. I am presently employed as a consulting geologist with OreQuest Consultants Ltd. of #306-595

Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia.3. I have been employed in my profession by various mining companies since graduation, with

OreQuest Consultants Ltd. since 1982.4. I am a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British

Columbia, and have been registered since 1992.1 am also a member of the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta and the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Manitoba.

5. I am responsible for preparation of all sections of this report utilizing data summarized in the References section of this report.

6. I most recently visited the subject property on July 26,27 and 29th, 2003.7. I have had no recent direct involvement with the Band-Ore, Shebandowan property since I co-

authored two reports for Band-Ore in 1993 and 1996 on the same subject property covered in by this report. I last visited the property in 1985.

8. I have been the author or co-author of an number of technical reports dedicated to exploration in the Band-Ore Shebandowan area including two reports written for Band-Ore Resources between 1993 and 1996 on the same property that is the subject of this report.

9. I am independent of Band-Ore Resources Ltd.10.1 consent to the use of this report for the purpose of filing assessment work on the Band-Ore

Shebandowan property.

George Cavey, P.Geo.

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 3rd day of Sept, 2003.

15

REFERENCESAGAR,G.1984: Band-Ore Evaluation - Progress Report #1, Inco Metals Company June 25,1984CHORLTON, L.1987: Geological Setting of Gold Mineralization in the Western Part of the Shebandowan

Greenstone Belt, District of Thunder Bay, Northwestern Ont; Ontario Geological Survey,Open File Report 5636.

CALVERT, D and CLARK, J.1999: Dan Calvert 1998 OPAP Program, Conacher Property, Conacher Township Jan, 1999 CALVERT SR, D and CALVERT JR, D.2000: 1999 OPAP Report, Conacher Property, Conacher Township Jan, 2000 CAVEY, G. and TURNBULL, D 1993: Report on the Shebandowan Property, Conacher Township for Band-Ore Resources Ltd.,

May 3,1993. CAVEY, G.1996: Letter to Band-Ore dated July 10,1996. CLAYTON, R.H. 1980: Summary Report for the Shebandowan Property of Band-Ore Resources Ltd., Watts, Griffis,

and McQuat Ltd., Toronto, June 6, 1980. CLAYTON, R.H. 1980: Report on the Shebandowan Property of Band-Ore Resources Ltd., Watts, Griffis, and

McQuat Ltd., Toronto, July 10, 1980. CLAYTON, R.H. 1984: Summary of Recent Work by Mattagami Lake Exploration on the Conacher Township

Claims of Band-Ore Resources Ltd., Watts, Griffis, and McQuat Ltd., July 20, 1984. CROSSCOMBE, J.S. 1947: Report on the Property of Band Ore Gold Mines Limited, Thunder Bay Mining Division,

Ontario, May 15, 1947. DUESS, R.1992: Summary Report for the Shebandowan Property of Band-Ore Resources Ltd. DUESS, R.2000: Geological Report for the Shebandowan Property, Band-Ore Resources Ltd. Jan 5, 2000. GREEN ICE INC.2003: News Release dated July 29,2003. HATCH, H.B.1946: Report on the Property of the Band Ore Gold Mines Limited; Shebandowan, Ont, April 1946. LAVIGNE, M. AND SCOTT, J. 1994: Report of Activities, 1993, Resident Geologist Program, Thunder Bay South Regional

Resident Geologist Report, Ontario Geological Survey Open File #5892 LAROUCHE C., LICHTBLAU, A 1995: Evaluation of Previous Exploration Work and the Potential for Gold Exploration, Conacher-

Hagy Properties for Landore Explorations Inc., Nov 30, 1995. MORIN, J.A. 1973: Geology of the Lower Shebandowan Lake Area, District of Thunder Bay, ODN Geological

Report #11O

16 V .v l '- ^vv! . : '-' '-" "

O'CONNER, A.1997: Report on Diamond Drilling, Shebandowan Project- Moose Calf Property, Shebandowan,

Ont, Green Ice Corporation, Feb 23, 1997. O'CONNER, A. 1997: Report on Diamond Drilling, Shebandowan Project- Narrows Property, Shebandowan, Ont,

Green Ice Corporation, April 1997. ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1991: Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Magnetic Survey, Shebandowan Area Map

81575 scale 1:20,000. OSAMANI, I.1997: Greenwater Lake Area , West Central Shebandowan, Greenstone Belt OGS Open File 296. SCHNIEDERS, B.R, SCOTT, J., SMYK, M. and O'BRIEN, M. 2003: Report of Activities, 2002, Resident Geologist Program, Thunder Bay South Regional

Resident Geologist Report, Ontario Geological Survey Open File #6112 STOTT, G.M., SCHNIEDERS, B.R.1983: The Geology of Gold in Ontario, A.C. Colvine; OGS Misc. Paper 110, Toronto, 1983. WITTE, M. 1981: Heap Leaching Metallurgical Studies on Several Ontario Gold Ores, Ontario Geological

Survey Open File #6112

NORANDA/MATTAGAMI REPORTS

BELLO, A, CASEY, J. and PARKER, D.1986: Diamond Drilling Report 1986-87, Band-Ore Property, N.T.S. 52B/9, Northwest Ontario

District, Project 1245, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, May l, 1987. BELLINGER, W. and BELLO,A. 1988: Report of Work, Band-Ore Property, N.T.S. 52B/9, Northwest Ontario District, Project 1245,

Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, March 25,1988. BELLINGER, W. 1992: Summary Report, Band-Ore Property, Conacher Township, Ontario, N.T.S. 52B/9,

Northwest Ontario District, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, January24, 1992.

CASEY, J. 1985: Final Report on the Sixth Program, Band-Ore Mines Option, N.T.S. 52B/9, Project 1245,

Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Nov 21,1985. CASEY, J. 1985: Report on the Core Relogging Program, Band-Ore Option Property, No.4 Zone, N.T.S.

52B/9,, Project 1245, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, June 13,1986. HUSKA, K.J. 1982: Diamond Drilling Report and Pre Evaluation study on the Band-Ore Option, Conacher

Township, Ontario; Mattagami Lake Exploration Company Limited, December 1982. HUSKA, K.J. 1981: Report on the Initial Program on the Band-Ore Option; Mattagami Lake Exploration

Company Limited, January 1981.

17

NEILSEN, P.1984: Geochemical Report, Band-Ore Extension, N.T.S. 52B/9, Project 1245, Northwest Ontario

District, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Nov 26, 1984. PARKER, D. 1986: Report on Work Diamond Drilling, Band-Ore Property, N.T.S. 52B/9, Northwest Ontario

District, Project 1245, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Dec 12, 86. PURDY, N. and CLUFF, R. 1984: Report on the Fifth Program, Band-Ore Mines Option, N.T.S. 52B/9,, Project 1245, Noranda

Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Dec, 1984. SUTHERLAND, D. 1982: Memorandum Detail IP Survey Zones l A 8 Greenwich Option Shebandowan Ont. for

Mattagami Lake Exploration Limited, March 1982. THOMPSON, K. 1989: Report on Diamond Drilling, Band-Ore Property, N.T.S. 52B/9, Northwest Ontario District,

Project 1245, Noranda Exploration Company Limited, Thunder Bay, Oct 31. WALLIS, C.S. 1980: Summary Report of the Band-Ore Property, Noranda Exploration Company Limited,

September 1980.

18

APPENDIX I

2000 BAND-ORE SAMPLE RESULTS

19

APPENDIX I- 2000 BAND-ORE SAMPLE RESULTS

Trench

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

DuessSample #

401514015240153401544015540156401574015840159401604016140162401634016440165401664016740168401694017040171401724017340174

ResultsAu (oz/ton)

0.0410.0190.2240.0450.0160.1560.0790.3700.0690.0050.0450.0110.0130.0010.0010.0040.3010.5490.1400.1260.2290.8040.0520.019

Trench

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBDDDDDDD

DuessSample #

4017540176401774017840179401804018140182401834018440185401864018740188401894019040191401927481748274837484748574867487

ResultsAu (oz/ton)

O.OOlO.OOlO.OOlO.OOlO.OOlO.OOlO.OOl0.0060.1770.002

O.OOlO.OOl0.340

O.OOl0.0010.0010.0030.0020.1430.9410.3240.0140.3840.0120.010

20

APPENDIX II

iPL ANALYTICAL RESULTS

21

APPENDIX II - iPL ANALYTICAL RESULTS COPPER AND GOLD RESULTS ONLY

Certificated 03H1222 Client: Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BANDORR No. of Samples: 58 Sample Type: Soil Date In: Aug 01, 2003 Date Out: Aug 11,2003 Grid l Grid 4

Line

1L1+OOE

1L1+OOE1L1+OOE 1L1+OOE1L1+OOE 1L1+OOE1L2+OOE 1L2+OOE1L2+OOE 1L2+OOE1L2+OOE 1L2+OOE1L3+OOE 1L3+OOE1L3+OOE 1L3+OOE1L3+OOE 1L3+OOE1L4+OOE 1L4+OOE1L4+OOE 1L4+OOE1L4+OOE 1L4+OOE1L5+OOE 1L5+OOE1L5+OOE 1L5+OOE1L5+OOE 1L5+OOE

Station

0+OOSA

0+OOSB0+50SA 0+50SB1+OOSA 1+OOSB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB1+OOSA 1+OOSB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB1+OOSA 1+OOSB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB0+80SA 0+80SB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB0+85 SA 0+85 SB

Au Cu ppb ppm^ 29

^ 534 15 ^ 21^ 32 2 33

289 39 163 54^ 33 4 442 28 12 44^ 23 ^ 25^ 29 ^ 81^ 25 ^ 85^ 27 ^ 34^ 12 ^ 22<2 169 317 263^ 27 <2 33^ 20 34 30<2 21 ^ 31

Line

4LO+OOE

4LO+OOE4LO+OOE 4LO+OOE4LO+OOE 4LO+OOE4L1+OOE 4L1+OOE4L1+OOE 4L1+OOE4L1+OOE 4L1+OOE4L2+OOE 4L2+OOE4L2+OOE 4L2+OOE4L2+OOE 4L2+OOE4L3+OOE 4L3+OOE4L3+OOE 4L3+OOE4L3+OOE 4L3+OOE4L4+OOE 4L4+OOE4L4+OOE 4L4+OOE

Station

0+00 A

0+00 B0+50NA 0+50NB0+50SA 0+50SB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50NA 0+50NB0+50SA 0+50SB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50NA 0+50NB0+50SA 0+50SB0+00 A 0+00 B5+50SA 5+50SB1+50SA 1+50SB0+00 A 0+00 B0+50SA 0+50SB

Au ppb

Cu ppm

^ 27

^ 10497

^10

^^<2

^

<2 <2<2 <2

^<2<2<2

<2^<2<2

<2

507524 13516 3014 36203161 10170 13940 3936 3916 3128 43125228 63

22

ALL SOIL RESULTS

Note: Results from the following elements were included in the iPl ICP soil sample analysis butexcluded from this Appendix as they were not consider either anomalous or relevant.Excluded elements were: Sb, Hg, Tl, Bi, Cd, Co, Ba, W, W, Cr, V, Mn, La, Sr, Zr, Se, Ti, Al, Mg, P.Certificate*: 03H1222Client: Orequest Consultants Ltd.Project: BANDORRNo. of Samples: 58Sample Type: SoilDate In: Aug01,2003Date Out: Aug 11, 2003

GRID1 Sample Name1L1+OOEO+OOSA 1L1+OOE 0+OOSB

1L1+OOE 0+50SA 1L1+OOE 0+50SB

1L1+OOE 1+OOSA 1L1+OOE 1+OOSB

1L2+OOE 0+00 A 1L2+OOE 0+00 B

1L2+OOE 0+50SA 1L2+OOEO+50SB

1L2+OOE 1+OOSA 1L2+OOE 1+OOSB

1L3+OOE 0+00 A 1L3+OOE 0+00 B

1L3+OOE 0+50SA 1L3+OOE 0+50SB

1L3+OOE 1+OOSA 1L3+OOE 1+OOSB

1L4+OOEO+OOA 1L4+OOE 0+00 B

1L4+OOE 0+50SA 1L4+OOEO+50SB

1L4+OOE 0+80SA 1L4+OOE 0+80SB

1L5+OOE 0+00 A 1L5+OOE 0+00 B

1L5+OOE 0+50SA 1L5+OOEO+50SB

1L5+OOE 0+85SA 1L5+OOE 0+85SB

Au ppb

24

2

289 163

4

2 12

?2

2

^ ^

^ ^

<2

<2 317<2

^ 34<2 <2

Ag Cu Pb ppm ppm ppm

0.1 0.1

0.2 0.2

0.1 0.1

1 0.5

0.1 0.1

0.1

0.1 0.1

0.1 O.I

0.1 O.I

O.I O.I

O.I 0.1

O.I 0.3

O.I O.I

O.I 0.1

O.I O.I

29 53

15 21

32 33

39 54

33 44

28 44

23 25

2981

25 85

27 34

1222

169 263

27 33

20 30

21 31

913

15 14

11 15

11 14

13 10

17 12

12 10

18 14

9 13

11 9

12 13

8 11

13 12

13 13

9 10

Zn As ppm ppm

45 < 53 <42 < 43 <176 < 92 <

67 <277 <46 < 38 <181 < 108 <57 < 51 <

239 <274 <244 < 520 <121 < 77 <198 < 131 <

3831 < 4492 <127 < 58 <356 <

360 <

110 <77 <

Mo Ni ppm ppm

5 2 5 3

5 2 5 1

5 35 2

5 2 5 2

5 2 5 2

5 2 5 2

5 2 S 2

5 2 5 2

5 1 5 2

5 3 5 2

5 2 5 2

S 2 5 1

5 2 5 2

5 1 5 3

5 2 5 2

3937

25 29

44 39

22 12

3633

37 54

36 35

4452

17 20

31 33

2935

41 40

36 34

36 45

3434

CaVo

0.8 0.91

0.35 0.44

0.25 0.27

0.17 0.09

0.27 0.34

0.24 0.34

0.25 0.26

0.29 0.39

0.34 0.36

0.26 0.29

0.19 0.29

0.59 0.62

0.24 0.27

0.19 0.24

0.3 0.34

Fe'/o

3.3 3.57

2.37 2.31

4.123.25

2.83 2.68

3.27 3.22

3.89 5.07

3.09 2.94

4.29 4.46

1.96 2.16

3.5 2.93

3.65 3.55

3.814.34

3.32 3.06

3.5 4.14

3.13 3.19

KVo

0.07 0.11

0.04 0.05

0.08 0.06

0.05 0.04

0.05 0.05

0.1 0.09

0.04 0.05

0.08 0.13

0.03 0.04

0.06 0.05

0.07 0.07

0.08 0.1

0.06 0.06

0.08 0.08

0.05 0.08

Na /o

0.14 0.13

0.05 0.08

0.06 0.06

0.04 0.03

0.06 0.08

0.05 0.06

0.05 0.06

0.05 0.06

0.08 0.07

0.05 0.06

0.06 0.08

0.1 0.1

0.05 0.06

0.04 0.05

0.07 0.09

23

GRID 4 Sample Name4LO+OOE 0+00 A 4LO+OOE 0+00 B

4LO+OOE 0+50NA 4LO+OOE 0+50NB

4LO+OOE 0+50SA 4LO+OOE 0+50SB

4L1+OOEO+OOA 4L1+OOEO+OOB

4L1+OOEO+50NA 4L1+OOE 0+50NB

4L1+OOE 0+50SA 4L1+OOEO+50SB

4L2+OOE 0+00 A 4L2+OOE 0+00 B

4L2+OOE 0+50NA 4L2+OOE 0+50NB

4L2+OOE 0+50SA 4L2+OOE 0+50SB

4L3+OOE 0+00 A 4L3+OOE 0+00 B

4L3+OOE 5+50SA 4L3+OOE 5+50SB

4L3+OOE 1+50SA 4L3+OOE 1+50SB

4L4+OOE 0+00 A 4L4+OOE 0+00 B

4L4+OOE 0+50SA 4L4+OOE 0+50SB

Au ppb

2

97

10

^

^

^ ^

^ ^

<2

^ <2

<2

<2<2

^<2

<2

<2<2

Ag ppmO.I O.I

0.1 0.1

0.1 O.I

0.1

0.1 O.I

O.I O.I

O.I O.I

O.I O.I

O.IO.I

O.I O.I

O.I O.I

O.I O.I

O.I O.I

O.I O.I

Cu Pb Zn As ppm ppm ppm ppm

27 104

5075

24 135

16 30

14 36

20 31

61 101

70 139

40 39

36 39

16 31

28 43

12 52

28 63

19 17

1722

18 18

18 14

16 13

14 10

1922

15 18

14 15

1011

12 13

11 13

6 12

15 13

119 <124 <88 < 105 <122 < 109 <

166 <115 <

92 <75 <68 < 49 <82 < 82 <79 < 61 <

80 <71 <38 < 40 <67 < 54 <

69 <72 <28 < 51 <87 < 67 <

Mo Ni ppm ppm

5 3 5 4

5 2 5 3

5 2 5 2

5 3 5 3

5 1 5 2

5 4 5 2

5 3 5 4

5 4 5 3

5 3 5 3

5 1 5 2

5 3 5 3

5 2 5 2

5 3

5 2 5 3

42 70

58 62

4877

3644

33 41

46 45

6477

52 82

51 46

39 48

37 49

3147

28 48

51 57

Ca /o

0.22 0.39

0.36 0.39

0.21 0.37

0.17 0.26

0.15 0.23

0.2 0.29

0.34 0.46

0.79 0.73

0.25 0.27

0.34 0.37

0.24 0.3

0.42 0.48

0.27 0.44

0.23 0.33

Fe"/o

4.42 5.26

4.33 5.27

3.64 4.33

3.63 3.78

3.18 3.84

3.93 3.46

4.77 4.94

3.45 4.07

4.21 3.63

3.03 3.12

3.48 3.45

3.14.12

2.49 3.6

4.14 4

K'/o

0.12 0.34

0.13 0.13

0.09 0.14

0.1 0.09

0.07 0.1

0.07 0.09

0.17 0.2

0.17 0.31

0.11 0.11

0.08 0.11

0.08 0.1

0.14 0.17

0.06 0.22

0.1 0.16

Na"/o

0.04 0.07

0.07 0.07

0.05 0.07

0.04 0.05

0.04 0.05

0.05 0.06

0.06 0.07

0.06 0.08

0.05 0.05

0.07 0.07

0.05 0.05

0.05 0.06

0.06 0.08

0.05 0.06

24

ROCK SAMPLE RESULTS

Note: Results from the following elements were included in the iPl ICP rock sample analysis butexcluded from this Appendix as they were not consider either anomalous or relevant.Excluded elements were: Sb, Hg, Tl, Bi, Cd, Co, Ba, W, W, Cr, V, Mn, La, Sr, Zr, Se, Ti, Al, Mg, P.

Certificated 03H1216Client: Orequest Consultants Ltd.Project: BANDORENo. of Samples: 6Date In: Aug01,2003Date Out: Aug 08,2003Sample Number885158851688518885198852188522

Au ppb334

10650526027701630

44

Ag ppm

130.511.29.24.20.4

Cu ppm

2610559

13211244

Pb ppm

949104

133

Zn ppm414491171374

187762

As Mo ppm ppm^ 2^ 2^ 2^ 2^ 1^ 2

Ni ppm

44

ci27

27

Ca"/o

0.460.840.260.660.153.39

Fe07o

1.884.192.944.334.053.25

K"/o

0.130.140.130.140.150.16

Na "/o

0.090.080.080.080.07

0.1

METALLIC SCREEN ROCK SAMPLE RESULTS

Certificated 03H1222Client: Orequest Consultants Ltd.Project: BANDORRNo. of Samples: 2Date In: Aug O l, 2003Date Out: Aug 11,2003

Sample Name88517 88520

Total

Sample g975.96 1123.2

+150M -150M Au+150 Sample g Sample g g/t

13.88 49.96

962.08 1073.24

149.55 16.9

Au-150 Au Total

g/t g/t31.05

8.8532.73

9.21

Sample Name

88517 88520

Aug/t

33.3 9.7

Agg/t

75.2 25.7

Ag ppm

6824

Cu ppm

47 153

Pb ppm

15 11

Znppm

156 590

As ppm

^

Ca"/o

0.63 1.96

Fe"/o

9.46 7.81

Na"/o

0.06 0.05

Note: Results from the following elements were included in the iPl ICP analysis of the rock samples butexcluded from this Appendix as they were not consider either anomalous or relevant.Excluded elements were: Mo, Ni, Sb, Hg, Tl, Bi, Cd, Co, Ba, W, W, Cr, V, Mn, La, Sr, Zr, Se, Ti, Al, Mg, K,P.

25

APPENDIX HI

iPL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

26

APPENDIX m- iPL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

1. METHOD OF 30 ELEMENT ANALYSIS BY AQUA REGIA DIGESTION/ICP

(a) 0.50 grams of sample is digested with diluted Aqua Regia solution by heating in a hot water bath, at about 95 Celsius for 90 minutes, then cooled and bulked up to a fixed volume with de-mineralized water, and thoroughly mixed. Digested samples are let settled over night to separate residue from solution.

(b) The specific elements are determined using an Inductively Coupled Argon Plasmaspectrophotometer. All elements are corrected for inter-element interference. All data are subsequently stored onto computer diskette.

Quality ControlThe machine is first calibrated using three known standards and a blank. The test samples are

then run in batches.

A sample batch consists of 38 or less samples. Two tubes are placed before a set. These are an In-house standard and an acid blank, which are both digested with the samples. A known standard with characteristics best matching the samples is chosen and placed after every fifteenth sample. After every 38th sample (not including standards), two samples, chosen at random, are re- weighed and analyzed. At the end of a batch, the standard and blank used at the beginning is rerun. The readings for these knowns are compared with the pre-rack knowns to detect any calibration drift.

Note: Some elements may not be completely digested

2. METHOD OF GOLD ANAL YSIS B Y FIRE ASSA Y/AAS

(a) 10.00 to 30.00 grams of sample was weighed into a fusion pot which contained a combination of fluxes such as lead oxide, sodium carbonate, borax, silica flour, baking flour or potassium nitrate. After the sample and fluxes had been mixed thoroughly, some silver inquart and a thin layer of borax was added on top.(b) The sample was then charged into a fire assay furnace at 2000 F for one hour, at this stage, lead oxide would be reduced to elemental lead and slowly sunken down to the bottom of the fusion pot and collected the gold and silver along the way.(c) After one hour of fusion, the sample was then taken out and pour into a conical cast iron mould, the elemental lead which contained precious metals would stayed at the bottom of the mould and any unwanted materials called slag would floated on top and removed by hammering, a "lead button" is formed.(d) The lead button was then put back in the furnace onto a preheated cupel for a second stage of separation, at 1650 F, the lead button became liquefied and absorbed by the cupel, but gold and silver which had higher melting points would stayed on top of the cupel.(e) After 45 minutes of cupellation, the cupel was then taken out and cooled, the dore bead which contained precious metals was then transferred into a test tube and dissolved in hot Aqua Regia solution heated by a hot water bath.

fi* . -- - -

27

(f) The gold in solution is determined with an Atomic Absorption spectrometer. The gold value, in parts-per-billion, or grams-per-tonne is calculated by comparison with a set of known gold standards.

Quality ControlEvery fusion of 24 pots contains 22 samples, one internal standard or blank, and a random

reweigh of one of the samples. Samples with anomalous gold values greater than 1000 ppb are automatically checked by Fire Assay/AA methods. Samples with gold values greater than 10000 ppb are automatically checked by Fire Assay/Gravimetric methods.

3. METHOD OF METALLIC GOLD ANALYSIS BY FIRE ASSAY

Sample preparation:(a) Samples are crushed to -10 mesh, riffle split into 250 grams and pulverized, The coarse

fraction is then screened out by using a 150 mesh size screen. The entire +150 mesh and a portion of minus are assay separately and a combined total gold in g/mt is calculated based on the weight of both fraction.

(b) 20 to 30 grams of samples was weighed into a fusion pot with fluxes such as lead oxide,sodium carbonate, borax, silica flour, baking flour or potassium nitrate. After the sample and fluxes had been mixed thoroughly, some silver inquart and a thin layer of borax was added on top.

(c) The sample was then charged into a fire assay furnace at 2000 F for one hour, at his stage, lead oxide would be reduced to elemental lead and slowly sunken down to the bottom of the fusion pot and collected the gold and silver along the way.

(d) After one hour of fusion, the sample was taken out and pour into a conical cast iron mould. The elemental lead which contained precious metals would stayed at the bottom of the mould and any unwanted materials called slag would floated on top and removed by hammering, a "lead button" is formed.

(e) The lead button was then put back in the furnace onto a preheated cupel for a second stage of separation, at 1650 F, the lead burton became liquefied and absorbed by the cupel, but gold and silver which had higher melting points would stayed on top of the cupel.

(f) After 45 minutes of cupellation, the cupel was then taken out and cooled, the dore bead which contained precious metals was then weighed and transferred into a test tube and dissolved in hot Aqua Regia solution heated by a hot water bath.

(g) The gold in solution is determined with an Atomic Absorption spectrometer. The gold value, in parts-per-billion, or grams-per-tonne is calculated by comparison with a set of known gold standards.

Quality ControlEvery fusion of 24 pots contains 22 samples, one internal standard or blank, and a random

reweigh of one of the samples. Samples with anomalous gold values greater than 500 ppb are automatically checked by Fire Assay/AA methods. Samples with gold values greater than 10000 ppb are automatically checked by Fire Assay/Gravimetric methods.

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iI'LU3HI222

Orcquest ConsultantsProject : BANDORE Shipper : George Cavey Shipment: P00: Comment:

26332 60 Samples Out: Aug 11, 2003 In: Aug 01, 2003 Page l of ||2

i Columbia Slreet Vancouver. B.C. Canada V5Y 3E1 Phone (00-1) 879-7070 F ux (G04) 079-7090 F.rnail iplabOtolns nel

[122218:06:15:30081103:001]

Document Distributionl Orequest Consultants Ltd. 306 - 595 Howe Street Vancouver B.C. V6C 2T5 Canada At t: George Cjvey

EH RT CC IN FX11121

DL 3D EH BT BL00100

Ph:604^88-6788Fx:6047688-9727

Em: gcaveyPorequest . com

CODE AMOUNT TYPE PREPARATION DESCRIPTIONBZ11 2 Rock crush, split K pulverize

B11100 58 Soil Dry 4 sift to -00 mesh, discard reject.

A ttfiltrf inol Cit **i**i n t-*r

ttm 5102030405

0607080910

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

2627282930

3132333435

36

AnalyslVrAu(M'ciaVlic)"'Au(FAyAAii 30g) 1 ICT(AqU)30

Code Method Units Description

080Z Spec Smpl g Total Weight (Z Decimal)080Z Spec Smpl g Weight (2 Decimal)0802 Spec Smpl g -150H sample Weight (2 Decimal)036B FA/AAS g/mt +150H Au Fire Assay g/mt0368 FA/AAS g/mt -150M Au Fire Assay g/mt

0368 FA/AAS g/mt Total Au Fire Assay g/mt0364 FAGrav g/mt Au FA/Grav in g/mt0354 FAGrav g/mt Ag FA/Grav 1n g/mt0313 FA/AAS ppb Au FA/AAS finish 30g0721 ICP ppm Ag ICP

0711 ICP ppm Cu ICP0714 ICP ppm Pb ICP0730 ICP ppm Zn ICP0703 ICP ppm As ICP0702 ICP ppm Sb ICP

0732 ICP ppm Mg ICP0717 ICP ppm Mo ICP0747 ICP ppm Tl ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0705 ICP ppm B1 ICP0707 ICP ppm Cd ICP

0710 ICP ppm Co ICP0718 ICP ppm N1 ICP0704 ICP ppm Ba ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0727 ICP ppm W ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0709 ICP ppm Cr ICP (Incomplete Digestion)

0729 ICP ppm V ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0716 ICP ppm Mn ICP0713 ICP ppm La ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0723 ICP ppm Sr ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0731 ICP ppffl Zr ICP (Incomplete Digestion)

0736 ICP ppm Se ICP0726 ICP * T1 ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0701 ICP 1 Al ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0708 ICP * Ca ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0712 ICP * Fe ICP (Incomplete Digestion)

0715 ICC t Mg ICP (Incomplete '.'xjestion)

NS-llo Sample

Element

WtwtwtGoldGold

GoldGoldSilverGoldSilver

CopperLeadZincArsenicAntimony

MercuryMolydenumThalliumBismuthCadmium

CobaltNickelBariumTungstenChromium

VanadiumManganese *-LanthanumStrontiumZirconium

ScandiumTitaniumAluminumCalciumIron

Maonffs iiifti

PULP REJECT1211/Dis 03M/D1SIZM/Dis OOM/Dis

Rep-flepHcate M-Honth Dis-t)1scard

Limit LimitLow High

0.01 99999.000.01 99999.000.01 99999.000.01 10000.000.01 10000.00

0.01 10000.000.07 9999.000.3 9999.0

Z 100000.1 100.0

1 100002 100001 100005 100005 2000

s3 100001 1000

10 10002 2000

0.2 2000.0

1 100001 100002 100005 10001 10000

1 100001 100002 100001 100001 10000

1 100000.01 10.000.01 10.000.01 10.000.01 10.00

/fi) 01 ft 10.00

l N l v .ii-pir ' K l Id p :: V.'. i" IN -

i h l j

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iPL 03111222

nmmwnoxM PIMMA uioMnxt uo

Orcquest Consultants Ltd.Project : BANDORE Shipper : George Cavey Shipment: PW: Comment:

60 Samples Out: Aug 11. 2003 In: AugOl. 2003 Page 2 of (2

i!03G Columbia SUocl Vancouver, D.C Canada V5Y 3E1 Chone (604) 879-7878 Fax (604) 879-7890tlmoil iplab@lelus riel

[122218:06:15:30081103:001]

Document Distribution-1 Orequest Consultants Ltd.

306 - 595 Howe Street Vancouver B.C. V6C 2T5 Canada Att: George Cavey

EN RT CC IN FX 11121

OL 3D EH BT BL 00100

Ph:60V68B-6788Fx:604X688-9727

Em: gcaveytforequest.com

Code Method Units Description

0720 ICP * K 1CP (Incomplete Digestion)0722 ICP X Na ICP (Incomplete Digestion)0719 ICP * P ICP

Element

PotassiumSodiumPhosphorus

LimitLow

0.010.010.01

LimitHigh10.0010.00B.00

l!'

lw W JRiww*

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS il'L 03111222

Client : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BAIIDORR

60 Samples2-Rock 58-Soll [122216:57:24:30081103:001]-

Out: Aug 111. 2003 In : Aug 01, 2003

i'036 Columbia SlietM V.'i'icijuvci. H C C;iiiadaV!iY 3H Phone (004) 879-7070 Fax (604)079-7890 Ginail iplabfllRlijs.nel

Page l of 2 Section l of 3

Sample Name

88517 88520 1L1+OOE 0+OOSA 1L1+OOE 0+OOSB 1L1+OOE 0+50SA

1L1+OOE 0+50SB 1L1+OOE 1+OOSA 1L1+OOE 1+OOSB 1L2+OOE 0+00 A 1L2+OOE 0+00 B

1L2+OOE 0+50SA 1L2+OOE 0+50SB 1L2+OOE 1+OOSA 1L2+OOE 1+OOSB 1L3+OOE 0+00 A

1L3+OOE 0+00 B -. 1L3+OOE 0+50SA 1L3+OOE 0+50SB 1L3+OOE 1+OOSA 1L3+OOE 1+OOSB

1L4+OOE 0+00 A 1L4+OOE 0+00 B 1L4+OOE 0+50SA 1L4+OOE 0+50SB 1L4+OOE 0+80SA

1L4+OOE 0+80SB 1L5+OOE 0+00 A 1L5+OOE 0+00 B 1L5+OOE 0+50SA 1L5+OOE 0+50SB

1L5+OOE 0+85SA 1L5+OOE 0+85SB 410+OOE 0+00 A 4LO+OOE 0+00 B 4LO+OOE 0+50NA

4LO+OOE 0+50NB 4LO+OOE 0+50SA 4LO+OOE 0+50SB 4l)*OOE 0+00 A

Him"! i"! |)P! J M ion Md* ir ."i Dot"1. 1. 'en Met' :

Type

Rock Rock

Soil Soil

Soil Soil Soil Soil

Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Soil Soil Soil Soil

Total +150M -150H Au+150 Au- 150 Au Ttl Au Ag Smpl g Smpl g Smpl g g/mt g/mt g/mt g/mt g/mt

975.96 13.88 962.08 149.55 31.05 32.73 33.30 75.2 1123.20 49.96 1073.24 16.90 8.85 9.21 9.70 25.7

— — — — — — — —

— — — — — — — —

— — — _-_____

— — — — — — — —

— — — — — — — —.

— — — _____

— — .,. — .... — —

o.o) o.t'i o.;.1 : o.yi o.ui o 01 o o- sij'J-y no y-."-'-* op -'^ f. looon.or i;n!0!! OD mooo.oo 99^ ;m .'.' v

Au I'l'b

_..—*2•c?4

^^2

?09163

^4212'2

<2'2<2-.2<2

<2'2<2<2<2

317'2'2<23*

'2'2<2<297

<2*210<2

Ag ppm

68.024.00.10.10.2

0.20.10.11.00.5

0.1'0.1'0.10.1'O.i0.1

'0.1'O.i0.1

<0.1

'O.i'O.i<0.1'0.1'0.10.3

'0.1'0.1'0.10.1

'0.1'0.'0.'0.'0.

0.0.

'0.O.I

Cuppm

47153295315

213233395-1

3344204-123

2529012585'

27341222169

26327332030

213127

10450

75H13516

Pb ppm

15119

1315

1411151114

1310171212

1018149

' 13

119

12133

1113121313

910191717

2218in18

Znppm

156590455342

431769267

277

4638

18110857

51239274244520

12177

198131

3831

449212758

356360

11077

11912488

105122109166

Asppm

'5'5'5'5'5

'5'5'5'5'5

'5'5'5'5'5

'5'5'5'5'5

'5'5'5'5'5

'5'5'5'5'5

'5'5'5'5'5

'5'5'5'-5

Sbppm

'5'5'5'5^

'5^^^'5

'5'5^^'5

'5^'5^*5

'5^'5^^

^'5'5'5'5

'5'5'5'5'5

'5*5'5•-•5

Mgppm

'3'3'3'3'3

'3'3'3'3'3

^'3'3'3'3

'3'3'3'3'3

'3'3'3'3'3

'3'3'3'3'3

'3'3'3'3'3

'3'3'3O

l

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iPL 03111222

2036 Columbia Slieel Vancouver, G.C. Canada V5Y 3t l Phone (604) 079-7070 Tax (601) 879-7898

INnillllllONU PIUMA UtOUIOH 110

:iient : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BANDORR

Sample Name

88517885201L1+OOE 0+OOSA1L1+OOE 0+005B1L1+OOE 0+50SA

1L1+OOE 0+50SB1H+OOE 1+OOSA1L1+OOE 1+OOSB1L2MJOE 0+00 A1L2+OOE 0+00 B

1L2+OOE 0+50SA1L2+OOE 0+50SB1L2+OOE 1+OOSA1L2+OOE 1+OOSB1L3+OOE 0+00 A

1L3+OOE 0+00 B '\1L3+OOE 0+50SA1L3+OOE 0+50SB1L3+OOE 1+OOSA1L3+OOE 1+OOSB

1L4+OOE 0+00 A1L4+OOE 0+00 B1L4+OOE 0+50SA1L4+OOE 0+50SB1L4+OOE 0+80SA

1L4+OOE 0+80SB1L5+OOE 0+00 A1L5+OOE 0+00 B1L5+OOE 0+50SA1L5+OOE 0+50SB

1L5+OOE 0+85SA1L5+OOE 0+85SB4LO+OOE 0+00 A4LO+OOE 0+00 B4LO*OOE 0+50NA

4LO+OOE 0+50NB4LO+OOE 0*50SA4LO+OOE 0+50SB4L1+OOE 0*00 A

Hinimura Oe'et i c'i Maximum Oru.1 ':'. i"'leiu.'.-l

Ho ppn

35232

13222

22222

2221Z

3222Z

12213

22342

3223

1 1000:ci

Tlppm

•UO•UO•aot !01 10

•ao*10^0^0•ao*10•00*10<10<10

<10•ao*10<10<10

elo•ao<10<10•:10

<10":104 10<10<10

*io*13<10<10'10

*10•MO<10* 10

ivKii' fi

60 Samples2-flock 58-Soll

B1ppm

^^^<2*2

<2<2^^^

*2<2<2<2^

<2<2<2<Z4

<2<2*2^4

<2<2<2<2^

<2*2eg<2^<2*2<2'2

i

1

Cd Co ppm ppm

*0.? 9^.2 li^.2 19^.2 21"0.2 14

*0.2 13e0.2 22"0.2 18"0.2 14*0.2 13

"0.2 19^.2 17^.2 19^.2 27^.2 17

*0.2 17^.2 17^.2 28*0.2 12"0.2 12

•:0.2 15^.2 16^.2 16^.2 20^.2 21

^.2 26^.2 18*0.2 17<0.2 19<0.2 22

^.2 200. 2 19^.2 21^.2 34*0.2 27

*0.2 31^.2 19•:0.2 32•:0.2 19

0 ? i,.:-,l) p ji.njr.

;ci " : '

Ni ppm

4•a393725

2944392212

3633375436

3544521720

3133293541

4036343645

3434427058

62487736

ii'

Bappm

42412020164

75136926666

7250786193

951831695090

7552

1067078

1151125514693

9763119104140

86153104167

'iiSOC-i;if.-' 1

VI ppra,e5^^•e5

^

^^^c5^

*5*5^*5*5

<5c5t 5<5^

<5<5<5^5*5

<5<5<5<5^

<5<5<5*5^

<545e;5

<5

L,

IIIUO 1H. f

Cr ppm

4646525126

3049402517

4236475144

4254912428

4746424665

6848425054

34416110169

815210946

- i

r.l22216:57:24:300U1103:001]

V ppm

916

142139118

1201591407439

176199176352126

121141172112112

13?134141167213

179130170131226

166146144265217

326116173113

..,;r

Mnppm

327966323557142

136226225190338

197197239348176

177233566142164

282232217248360

445253218241287

170252221429209

335239361413

1

i r

Lappm

33

13248

98101113

101311119

810121123

899

1116

1910119

10

611101411

13Q

1?11

r ,,;', ,'

Sr ppm

31793?4016

21121476

1012111314

1417171314

1111141623

2719121111

1423111417

1610139

i

i

Zr ppm

108773

36755

7846

, 4

54654

34696

55646

613688

104(I3

1I'.'COO :'' 1 1.

Out : In :

Se

^•:1472

33322

43443

33f.35

33446

74434

24475

53f).1

1

Aug li Auq 01.

li \

"0.01•:0.01

0.200.170.14

0.150.180.150.080.03

0.170.1B0.160.280.16

0.150.150.230.16

"0.16

0.130.140.170.190.23

0.200.140.160.140.19

0.170.190.160.290.23

0.280.140.230.13

'' '..i

pi I..

2003 2003

Al

0.791.271.B62.301.63

1.792.832.422.321.76

2.612.233.142.092.58

2.503. 873.361.131.32

2.382.212.902.781.46

1.752.841.712.912.46

2.232.453.493.293.25

2.863.393.B5'i 96

•il

Page 1 of 2 Section 2 of 3

Ca

0.631.960.800.910.35

0.440.250.270.170.09

0.270.340.240.340.25

0.260.290.390.340.36

0.260.290.190.290.59

0.620.240.270.190.24

0.300.340.220.390.36

0.390.210.370.17

.' '."M . - -J i 1

: "i-

Fe \

9.467.813.303.572.37

2.314.123.252.032.68

3.273.223.895.073.09

2.944.294.461.962.16

3.502.933.653.553.81

4.343.323.063.504.14

3.133.194.425.264.33

5.273.644.333.63

(' (ii; '"i

Mg K

0.470.690.900.850.34

0.410.620.520.440.41

0.560.540.660.690.49

0.480.651.110.330.36

0.600.570.550.590.80

0.890.660.490.560.63

0.480.880.731.290.93

1.050.711.350.51

•,; o i

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 1PL03HI222

INUPNATIONAI r

Client : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BANDORR

60 Samples2-Rock 58*Soil [122216:57:24:30081103:001]

Out. In

Auy lil j ?003 Aug 01, 2003

20'M Columbia Slteel Vancouver, BC. Cnnadii V5Y ,'JE 1 Phone (GO*) 879-7070 Tax (GO'1) 879-7890 Email iplnb^lalus.nd

Page l of Section 3 of

Sample Name

88517885201L1+OOE 0+OOSA1L1+OOE 0+OOSB1L1+OOE 0+50SA

1L1+OOE 0+50SB1L1+OOE 1+OOSA1L1+OOE 1+OOSB1L2+OOE 0+00 A1L2+OOE.O+00 B

1L2+OOE 0+50SA1L2+OOE 0+50SB1L2+OOE 1+OOSA1L2+OOE 1+OOSB1L3+OOE 0+00 A

1L3+OOE 0+00 B v1L3+OOE 0+50SA1L3+OOE 0+50SB1L3+OOE 1+OOSA1L3+OOE 1+OOSB

1L4+OOE 0+00 A1L4+OOE 0+00 B1L4+OOE 0+50SA1L4+OOE 0+50SB1L4+OOE 0+80SA

1L4+OOE 0+80SB1L5+OOE 0+00 A1L5+OOE 0+00 B1L5+OOE 0+50SA1L5+OOE 0+50SB

1L5+OOE 0+B5SA1LS+OOE 0+85SB4LO+OOE 0+00 A4LO+OOE 0+00 B4LO+OOE 0+50NA

4LO+OOE 0+50NB4LO+OOE 0+50SA4LO+OOE 0+50SB4L1+OOE 0+00 A

Minimum Deled icn iiixTinuni iJetficl i. M

KH

0.090.090.070.110.04

0.050.080.060.050.04

0.050.050.100.090.04

0.050.080.130.030.04

0.060.050.070.070.08

0.100.060.060.080.08

0.050.080.120.340.13

0.130.090.140.10

0.' .

NaK

0.060.050.140.130.05

0.080.060.060.040.03

0.060.08O.OS0.060.05

0.060.050.060.080-07

0.050.060.06O.OB0.10

0.100.050.060.040.05

0.070.090.040.070.07

0.070.050.070.04

.'i 1 1

P*

0.020.030.030.030.02

0.030.030.030.040.04

0.04 ,0.050.120.070.04

0.040.070.070.010.01

0.040.040.030.030.04

0.050.030.040.050.05

0.030.020.080.080.06

0.060.090.080.08

0.01 u . 00

•O-M

IP^(W "W

MSfi*36**Tf "

CERTIFICATE OK ANALYSISil'L 03111 222

INtltNtllOMU PIAIM* lAIOUtOIT HO

Client : OrequestVoject: BANDORR

Sample Name

4L1+OOE 0+00 B4L1+OOE 0+50N4U+OOE 0+50 B4L1+OOE 0+50SA4L1+OOE 0+50SB

4L2+OOE 0+00 A4L2+OOE 0+00 B412+OOE 0+50NA4L2+OOE 0+50NB4L2+OOE 0+50SA

4L2+OOE 0+50SB4L3+OOE 0+00 A4L3+OOE 0+00 B4L3+OOE 5+50SA4L3+OOE.5+50SB

4L3+OOE 1+50SA-;4L3+OOE 1+50SB4L4+OOE 0+00 A4L4+OOE 0+00 B4L4+OOE 0+50SA

4L4+OOE 0+50SB

Minimum Oeiec* ". " •'lAxifljim Di' t ("ri : : : Mi'lltOi)

Consultants Ltd.

Type

SoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

SoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

SoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

SoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

Soil

*

60 Samples2-Rock 58=5011 [122216:57:24:30081103:001]

Total +150H -150H Au+150 Au-150 Au Ttl Au Ag Au AgSmpl g Smpl g Smpl g g/mt g/mt g/mt g/mt g/mt ppb ppm

_ _ . _ _ . — _ . — r-2 ^0 1—— — — —— — — . .. — <2 cQ.l— — — — — — .- t? eQ.l— — ~ .... — — *2 <0.1— — — — .- — ... <2 cO.l

— — — _____<2 .cO.l— — — — — — — _<2<0.1— — — — _ — _ _ <2<0.1— — _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ *0 . l— — — — — — — — '-2 0.1

— — — — — — — — <2 *0.1— — — — — — — — <2 tfl.'l

— — — — .- — - ^2 ^.1_ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ <2 *: 0 1. _ . ^ ̂ . _ . ^^^ ^^ ^ _ . _ _ ^2 <o 1

^^ , _ _ ,. _ _ ^ _ _ _ ^2 <^ i^ _ , ^.^ ^^, . _ . . _ . _ _ _ ^2 en 1_ _ _ c y c n i —— — - — — — — — - .p.^- *,^ -*u 1 1— — — — — — _ _ c2 <0.1— — — — — — — — c2 ^.1

5.01 C. 01 0.01 01 0.01 0 L'i l'. 'J/ 0 J -' 1ojiiso oo ? c?9y oy -.^^99 o"- ; ;'"'- oo ;^ ; i;fio IK; liioiu; u:; --vy) ov ••••w o i^r" *

Out:In :

Cuppm

3014362031

61101

7013940

3936391631

2843125228

63

i

i i

Aug \ l!.Aug 01.

Pbppm

1416131410

1922151814

1510111213

11136

12-' 15

13

-HM

?0032003

Znppm

11592756849

0282796180

7138406754

6972205187

67

i

203(3 Columbia Slieol Vancouver, l). C.Canada V5Y3C1 Phone (604) 879-7078Tax (604) 879-7090Email iplabOlalus riel

Page 2 of 2Section 1 of 3

As Sb Hgppro ppm ppm

*5 ^ c3^ ^ *3*5 ^ O^ <5 O^ *5 <3

t5 ^ ^<5 <5 <3^ *5 <3*5 <5 0^ <5 <3

<5 *5 <3•^5 *5 O^ <5 <3<5 <5 *3<5 *5 *3

<5 t 5 f 3*5 ^5 <3^ <5 <3<5 <5 ^<5 <5 <3

<5 *5 <3

fi i) i i'lOl'O .^'00 i""'.".'

9Jjf P~ WPS*

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS il'LU3H1222

H* UHOIUIOM no

iUJo LoiuinUia btieel Vancouver DC. Conacta V5Y 3E t Phone (004) 0/9-7870 fax (GO'1) 0/9-7U9U

;iient : Orequest Consultants Ltd. 'reject: BANDORR

Sample Name

4L1+OOE 0+00 B4L1+OOE 0+50N4L1+OOE 0+50 B4L1+OOE 0+50SA4L1+OOE 0+50SB

4L2+OOE 0+00 A4L2+OOE 0+00 B4L2+OOE 0+50HA4L2+OOE 0+50NB4L2+OOE 0+50SA

4L2+OOE 0+50SB4L3+OOE 0+00 A4L3+OOE 0+00 B4L3+OOE 5+50SA4L3+OOE 5+SOSB

4L3+OOE 1+50SA4L3+OOE 1+50SB ~4L4+OOE 0+00 A4L4+OOE 0+00 B4L4+OOE 0+50SA

4L4+OOE 0+50SB

MV Mm DeiectionM,.. .Mm |V-r eel mn

Ho ppm

31242

34433

31233

22

•432

3

11000 ...p

Tl ppm

•40"10"10•40•40

•40<10<10<10

. <10

• 10<10<10•40<10

•10<10<10•10•10

lu loonl).l. '

60 Samples2^ock 58-

Bi Cdppm ppm

<2 0.2^ <0.2^ •0.2•2 •0 2•2 '0.2

•2 •O.?•2 *0.2<2 •0.2*2 *0.2•2 *0.2

•2 •0.2•2 e0.2•2 *0.2•2 *0.2•2 *0.2

•2 •O. 2•2 •0.2•2 *0.2•2 0.2•2 •O. 2

i' U , ?nno ?orn i ;r.p :

Co ppm

2017232221

2834242627

2217191822

1823132321

27

i

Soil

Ni ppm

4433414645

6477528251

4639483749

3147284851

57

1 liiOC'O

;.T

Ba ppm

12915111410397

110102165160104

808695

1231ZO

821194697127

75

•t j, moo

W Cr ppm ppm

•5 52•5 42•5 57•5 50•5 49

•5 835 1025 65

•5 91•5 65

•5 55•5 42•5 55•5 43•5 49

•5 54•5 72•5 27•5 59•5 56

•5 59

5 J 1000 10000I.I 1 1 . 1

V ppm

135104

.196188187

179171116136162

152152150150162

140162156160160

225

110000Mr

[122216:

Mnppm

343208256259250

323377382395209

199205232244239

4303-19200361240

335

iHUM,,.

57:24:30081103:001]

La ppm

119

1189

101555579

11101277

8106

148

10

•COi.i' -"i

Srppm

101011910

1316272411

1317181113

1516112212

11

1 .ii noo ...p

Z rppm

65956

77456

58745

57496

7

1

Oul: In :

Seppm

43434

57594

44423

34254

4

i

Aug 1 1 4 Any 01.

Ti

0.150.120.200.180.18

0.220.230.160.210.19

0.180.180.190.1C0.17

0.190.21C. 130.19(M7

0.21

0.0! 10. ("J

P003 2003

A) *

3.212.992.652.742.40

3.343.852.713.273.18

2.682.672.332.272.65

1.562.441.242.693.06

2.11

0.01 10 ('l.1

1 '. *

Page 2 of 2 Section 2 of 3

Ca V

0.260.150.230.200.29

0.340.460.790.730.25

0.270.340.370.240.30

0.420.480.270.440.23

0.33

o c:i,.-. .-..i

Fe

3.783.183.843.933.46

4.774.943.454.074.21

3.633.033.123.483.45

3.104.122.493.604.14

4.00

fi. t i !C v.

Mg V

0.700.560.750.570.65

1.021.280.901.260.72

0.640.620.790.57O.G6

0.741.030.391.000.71

0.79

0 01 i C' o;;

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISil'L 03111222

2030 Columbia SUcnl Vancouver. 13.C Canada V5Y 3E l Phone (604) 079-7870 Fax (G04) 879-7B90

Client : OrequeU Project: BANDOftf

Sample Name

4L1+OOE 0+00 B411+OOE 0+50N4L1+OOE 0+50 B4L1+OOE 0+50SA4L1+OOE 0+50SB

4L2+OOE 0+00 A4L2+OOE 0+00 B4L2+OOE 0+50NA4L2+OOE 0+50NB4L2+OOE 0+50SA

4L2+OOE 0+50SB4L3+OOE 0+00 A4L3+OOE 0+00 B4L3+OOE 5+50SA4L3+OOE 5+50SB

4L3+OOE 1+50SA.4L3+OOE 1+50SB ~4L4+OOE 0+00 A4L4+OOE 0+00 B4L4+OOE 0+50SA

4L4+OOE 0+50SB

'••n imuii. Detect u-n "..)-imuif LVUU'c:' ' Ml"!

Consultants Ltd.

K l

0.090.070.100.070.09

0.170.200.170.31o.ir0.110.080.110.08

' 0.10

0.140.170.060.220.10

0.16

0.01 10.00ir?

Na

0.050.040.050.050.06

0.060.070.060.080.05

0.050.070.070.050.05

0.050.060.060.08O.OS

0.06

a. ui10.00i C"

60 Samples Out: Aug HI. 2003 Page 2 of 2 2-Rock 58-Soll [122216:57:24:30081103:001] In : Aug 01. 2003 Section 3 of 3

P l

0.100.040.050.050.04

0.040.060.040.060.03

0.020.040.040.030.04 ,

0.020.030.030.050.06

0.05

i i

t

r

,1

1t l

|(li

,*

j:

C

1fJri;

i

i

0.01'. Hit

j.": 1

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iPL 03H1216

INTERNATIONAL PLASMA LABORATORY LTD

Orequest Consultants Ltd. 6 Samples Out: Aug 08. 2003 In: Aug 01. 2003

2036 Columbia Stioel Vancouver, B.C. Canada V5Y 3E1 Phone (604) 879-70/8 Fax (604) 879-7898 Email iplab@telns nnl

[121615:04:49:30080803:001]rrujeti. : onnuuncShipper : David GunningShipment: P0#:Coninicnt:

Document Distribution ————————————1 Orequest Consultants Ltd. EN RT CC IN FX

306 - 595 Howe Street 11121Vancouver DL 3D EM BT BLB.C. V6C 2T5 00100CanadaAtt: George Cavey Ph: 604/688 -6788

Fx: 604/688 -9727Em: gcaveyPorequest.com

2 D. R. Gunning Consultant EN RT CC IN FX11001

Langley DL 3D EM BT BLB.C. 01100CanadaAtt: David Gunning Ph 1604/533 -5678

FXI604/533-5648Em: d gunningPtelus.net

1^ ' s*o\'

stc"v*-^ (V*

C -~y;'f~ ̂V \,

009'C' " **

CODE AMOUNT TYPE PREPARATION DESCRIPTION PULP REJECTB211 6 Rock crush, split 4 pulverize 12M/D1S OSM/Dis

NS=No Sample Rep=Replicate M=Month Dis~DiscardA li olirtlf**ll di tnrkionr

m0102030405

0607080910

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

2627282930

31

j— 1 11 di y 1. 1 V.H1 ILJ UIIIHIKIB T —————————————————————————————————————————————————— " ———————— ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Analysis: ICP(AqR)30 Au(FA7AAS 30g) 1

Code Method Units Description Element Limit LimitLow High

0313 FA/AAS ppb Au FA/AAS finish 30g Gold 2 100000721 ICP ppm Ag ICP Silver 0.1 100.00711 ICP ppm Cu ICP Copper 1 100000714 ICP ppm Pb ICP Lead 2 100000730 ICP ppm Zn ICP Zinc 1 10000

0703 ICP ppm As ICP Arsenic 5 100000702 ICP ppm Sb ICP Antimony 5 20000732 ICP ppm Hg ICP Mercury 3 100000717 ICP ppm Mo ICP Molydenum 1 10000747 ICP ppm Tl ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Thallium 10 1000

0705 ICP ppm Bi ICP Bismuth 2 20000707 ICP ppm Cd ICP Cadmium 0.2 2000.00710 ICP ppm Co ICP Cobalt 1 100000718 ICP ppm Ni ICP Nickel 1 100000704 ICP ppm Ba ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Barium 2 10000

0727 ICP ppm W ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Tungsten ' 5 10000709 ICP ppm Cr ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Chromium 1 100000729 ICP ppm V ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Vanadium 1 100000716 ICP ppm Mn ICP Manganese 1 100000713 ICP ppm La ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Lanthanum 2 10000

0723 ICP ppm Sr ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Strontium 1 100000731 ICP ppm Zr ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Zirconium 1 100000736 ICP ppm Se ICP Scandium 1 100000726 ICP * T1 ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Titanium 0.01 10.000701 ICP * Al ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Aluminum 0.01 10.00

0708 ICP * Ca ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Calcium 0.01 10.000712 ICP * Fe ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Iron 0.01 10.000715 ICP X Mg ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Magnesium 0.01 10.000720 ICP X K ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Potassium 0.01 10.000722 ICP * Na ICP (Incomplete Digestion) Sodium 0.01 10.00

0719 ICP * P ICP Phosphorus 0.01 5.00

| /)

EN=^nvelope# RT^Rcport Style CCK'opies IN=lnvoices Fx=Fax(l=YesO=No) Totals: ^Copy 2^nvoice 1=3 '/i Disk \ sT~~j?[^Download 30=3 M)isk EM^-Mail BT'BBS Type BL~BBS(^ Yes (^No) 10=0)1670103 /2fc\ S* Our liability is limited solely to the analytical cost of these analyses. BC Certified Assaycr: David Chill t g^f*\l '

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS iPL 03H1216

INTERNATIONAL PI ASMA U60HATOBV IIP

Client : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Project: BANDORE

6 Samples6-Rock [121615:04:49:30080803:001]

Out: In :

Aug 08. 2003 Aug 01, 2003

2036 Columbia Street Vancouver, B.C. Canada V5Y 3E1 Phone (6(M) 879-7078 Fax (604) 879-7890 Email iplab@telus.net

Page l of Section 2 of

Sample Name Lappm

Sr ppm

Zr ppm

Se ppm

Ti Al*

Ca*

Fe X

Mg X

NaX

8851588516885188851988521

88522

3742274724

65

410898

11

l ^.01

a o.01 o.01 o.01

1704,n26

1.10

0.460.840.260.660.15

1.884.192.944.334.05

0.570.570.600.610.55

0.130.140.130.140.15

0.090.080.080.080.07

2 0.01 0.47 3.39 3.25 1.14 0.16 0.10

0.050.040.040.040.04

0.05

Minimum Detection - 2111 Maximum Detection 10000 10000 10000 10000 Method ICP ICP ICP ICP —^No Test Ins—Insufficient Sample DcHDelay Max=No Estimate

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 5.00

ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP Rec=ReClleck n^xlOOO "/(^Estimate "/o NS^o Sample

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS IPL03H1216

INTERNATIONAL PI ASM* lAROHATORY ITD

2036 Columbia Street Vancouver, B.C. Canada V5Y 3E1 Phono (GO'1) 079-7070 Fax (604)879-7898

Client : Orequest Consultants Ltd. Droject: BANDORE

Sample Name Type

88515 Rock 88516 Rock 88518 Rock 88519 Rock 88521 Rock

88522 Rock

6 Samples Out: Aug 08 j 2003 Page 1 of 1 6-Rock [121615:04:49:30080803:001] In : Aug 01. 2003 Section 1 of 2

Au Ag Cu Pb Zn As Sb Hg Mo Tl Bi Cd Co Ni Ba W Cr V Mn ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm

334 1.0 26 9 414 ^ <5 ^ 2 ^0 <2 <0.2 7 4 95 ^ 56 15 453 llm 30.5 105 49 491 ^ ^ *3 2 ^0 <2 ^.2 7 4 43 ^5 55 8 529

5260 11.2 59 10 171 ^ ^ <3 2 ^0 <2 *0.2 5 *1 59 <5 32 8 449 2770 9.2 132 4 374 *5 ^ <3 2 ^0 <2 -^0.2 7 2 49 ^ 58 11 503 1630 4.2 112 13 1877 ^ ^ <3 1 <10 ^ 2.9 9 7 70 ^ 47 11 539

44 0.4 44 3 62 ^ ^ <3 2 <10 <2 ^0.2 14 27 37 <5 54 7 840

**

Minimum Detection 2 0.1 l 2 l 5 5 3 l 10Maximum Detection 10000 100.0 10000 10000 10000 10000 2000 10000 1000 1000Method FA/AAS ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP "No Test Ins^nsufficienl Sample De^Delay Max=No Estimate Rec=RcCheek m=xlOOO "/^Estimate "/r. NS^No Sample

2 0.2 l l 22000 2000.0, 10000 10000 10000ICP ICP ICP ICP ICP

51111000 10000 10000 10000ICP ICP ICP ICP

ONTMIO MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES

Work Report Summary

Transaction No: W0340.01495 Status: APPROVED

Recording Date: 2003-SEP-19 Work Done from: 2003-JUL-26

Approval Date: 2003-OCT-20 to: 2003-SEP-03

Client(s):215879 BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD.

Survey Type(s):ASSAY GCHEM

Work Report Details:

Claim#

G

G

G

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

4000456

4000467

4040013

614741

614742

614743

614744

614745

614746

614747

614748

1187494

Perform

31,482

31,483

S988

SO

S989

30

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

5988

S5.930

External Credits:

Perform Approve

S1.482

S1.483

S988

SO

S989

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

S988

S5.930

SO

AppliedSO

soso

5400

S400

S400

S400

S400

S400

S400

S400

S800

54,000

Applied Approve

SO

soSO

S400

S400

S400

S400

S400

5400

5400

5400

5800

S4.000

Assign

S 1,482

S 1,483

5988

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

53,953

Assign Approve

1,482

1,483

988

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

53,953

Reserve

SO

sosoSO

S965

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

SO

S965

S1.930

Reserve Approve

SO

sososo

S965

50

SO

SO

SO

soSO

S965

S1.930

Due Date

2004-NOV-09

2004-NOV-09

2004-NOV-09

2004-NOV-09

2004-NOV-09

2004-NOV-09

2004-NOV-09

2005-NOV-09

2005-OCT-01

Reserve:S1 ,930 Reserve of Work

S1.930 Total Remaining

Report#: W0340.01495

Status of claim is based on information currently on record.

52B09NE2009 2.26332 CONACHER 900

2003-Oct-24 14:12 Armstrong-d Page 1 of 1

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Date: 2003-OCT-20

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE 933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 6B5

BAND-ORE RESOURCES LTD. 1115 SUTTON DRIVE, SUITE 200 BURLINGTON, ONTARIO L7L 5Z8 CANADA

Tel: (888) 415-9845 Fax:(877)670-1555

Dear Sir or Madam

Submission Number: 2.26332 Transaction Number(s): W0340.01495

Subject: Approval of Assessment Work

We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.

At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.

The revisions outlined in the Notice dated September 22, 2003 have been corrected. Accordingly, assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the Declaration of Assessment Work Form that accompanied this submission.

If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact BRUCE GATES by email at bruce.gates@ndm.gov.on.ea or by phone at (705) 670-5856.

Yours Sincerely,

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section

Cc: Resident Geologist

Robert Leo Duess (Agent)

Band-Ore Resources Ltd. (Assessment Office)

Assessment File Library

Band-Ore Resources Ltd. (Claim Holder)

Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page: 1 Correspondence 10:18781

ON1MUOCANADAMining Land Tenure

Map

m 10O)

o o

O

l

K) O O

71700fJE 718000E 71900CS 720000E 721000E

UTM Zano 1& JODOm flftf

Date ? Time of ll*ut: Mon Od 20 15:04:29 EOT 2003

TOWNSHIP l AREA PLAN CONACHER G-0646

ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS l DIVISIONS

Mining Division Thunder BayLand Titles/Registry Division THUNDER BAYMinistry of Natural Resources District THUNDER BAY

TOPOGRAPHIC Land TenureFtoMXKtl SatoM

['2,'j HWw"*. tSRf

[S] •~.*

rg w

[i "*"B3 -LS "-[SI **

HH "-

: ••n*^*

m

t^/^iWSl •'j

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWALS

IMPORTANT NOTICiS

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRIPTIONS

**rr JifH.SWHw* Jw!,*J0iWi Ml.'wt

"" "fi RtSHtI ONLY WITK*!**t4 CNOM DTAKIHft OMUBH W-TB-1MJ" SEC ' 1 91BJI!rlVATW*l#ri(ftM(

2.26332 GCHEM ASSAY

General Information and Limitations

Area of Main Zone

\Mafic Volcanics

tJvj'W//28^. \

AMafic Volcanics

, ;̂;.'" PORPHYRY

Intermediate VoTcanics

N6.2 Grid

Intermediate l Volcanics

No.4 Zone OREOUEST

Band-Ore Resources Ltd.SHEBANDOWAN LAKE PROPERTY

Conacher Township G 646

Geological Compilation

52B09NE2009 2.26332 CONACHER 210

General Notes:Exposed area consists entirely of feldspar porphyry. Rock for the most part is massive to weakly sheared, weakly altered with well preserved porphyritic textures. More intensely sheared and altered (carbonate sericite) zones do occur and are best exposed in the west part of the trench. Sulphide mineralization is erratic, and is generally confined to sheared and altered sections, where up to 107D pyrite mineralization occurs. Several samples of trie mineral were collected returned values of up to 0.604 oz Au/ton.

LEGEND

x

54

SAMPLE NUMr3ER (401) XX

Trench Plan Trench Ascale 1:500

O 5 10 15m

SCALE

75 72

covered

pyrite(gossanous)

66 TO 70

Shear Zone (locally gossanous * mineralization)

VIEW LOOKING EAST

VIEW LOOKING WEST

trencc-a.cdr Jan.5/00

Band-Ore Resources Ltd.

SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY Conacher Township

Fig. 5

?Sampling Results Results given in oz Au/ton

Sample

4015140152401534015440155401564015740155401594016040161401624016340164401654016640167 4016S401694017040171401724017340174

Result0.0410.019O.2240.0450.0160.1560.0790.3700.0690.0050.0450.0110.013O.OO10.0010.0040.3010.5490.1400.1260.229O.5O40.0520.019

toCOo

General Notes:Exposed rock in trenched area consisted entirely of porphyry, weathered white to light grey in colour. Texture varies with deformation and alteration, i.e., from

relatively massive and weakly altered to strongly altered - carbonate and sericite and strong to intensely deformed - sheared and schistose, Sericite carbonate schist is well developed in strongly sheared section with only occasional remnant porphyry textures present if any at all. Sulphide mineralization is generally sparse, with the exception of occasional narrow sulphide seams parallel to foiiation and shearing, Shearing - schistosity is slightly variable at 900 and dip is vertical to steep to the north.

Trench Plan^Trench B

scale 1:500N

massive section

Sampling Results Results given in oz Au/ton

Sample

4017540176401774O176401794010040151401624O1634O164401654O1664O1674016040189401904019140192

Result

cO.OOI< 0.001^.OO1^.OO1*:0.001•cO.OOl•cO.001O.OO60.1770.002^.OO1^.OO10.34O^.001*:0.001O.OO1O.O03O.OO2

LEGEND

61- SAMFLE NUMBER (4O1) XX

Highly variably from weakly to strongly sheared

1.2m wide strong shear - fault22 - 23mSRelatively massive section

0.6m wide strong sk

Gradatlonal contact23 -49mSModerately to strongly sheared - schistose with occasionalnarrow seams (Vtcm) or rusty sulphides,

8)

narrow sulphide seam

49 -54m5Relatively massive to weakly sheared, weakly sericitic and weakcarbonate alteration.

72 -SOmSStrongly sheared section. Sericite carbonate schistsjocallyrusty and mineralized with up to 170 pyrite.

TRENCHE-BCDR Jan.5/00

&0-

Weakly sheared, weakly to moderate sericite altered section.Trace sulphide mineralization.

Band-Ore Resources Ltd. SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

Conacher Township Fig. 6

^ — — ̂

- ———— - — ̂

ar - fault\^

-•s- *.

occasional^^^

21(1m)^^Vearn ^d^

ovb

itic and weak

istsjocally

s seams"^ed section. ^^

'\

ovb

— *-

65 0*

~ ~^-~~

wate—x-—

^-'

^

water

|jssrv^^r*t^.^

x

-— ̂ ^

x —

se 0

-- — —

ovb

x-r^'x —

x —---X-— .-.x.-•H—

ovl?

— 5m

- 10m

- 20m

^

^^^— ̂ ^"

- 40m~^^^--^

^^^^^^—

— 60m

- SOm

- 69m iow lying area

91,92

90

67665=5

636462

60

797677

7675

15m

View of Trench B Looking North

Sample 401#3:narrow sulphide seam in sheared and intensely sericite and carbonate altered porphyry, this sample returned a value of 0.177 oz Au per ton.

Sample 40193: 0.6 metre wide shear zone- intensely sheared porphyryr altered to sericitecarbonate schist. Very 0radational contacts

LLlOCM tO

5390215NView of Trench 5 Looking South

to w o .~

52B09NE2009 2.26332 CONACHER 240Trench Plan

Trench Dscale NTS

LU O (O

N̂

5390245N

Filled in overburdentrench?

Grab samples742-174S2742-374547405743674S7

5m

2-3m deep ^ filled with water

grab

Photograph showing horizontal exposure of sheared and altered porphyry (sericite carbonate schist). Schist is rusty and variably mineralized with pyrite and occasional flecks of green mica. Note bottom of trench filled with water.

Photograph of rusty mineralized schist on vertical face, looking east. Grab samples collected from this location returned values up to O.941 oz Au per ton. Zone is poorly exposed in this location.

N

TRENCHES.CDR Jan.^OQ

Strongly sheared rusty schi&t mineralized with 2-570 disseminated pyrite (along east wall)

Band-Ore Resources Ltd, SHEBANDOWAN PROPERTY

Conacher Township Fig. 8

Sampling Results Results given in oz Au/ton

Sample

7451745274537454745574567457

Result0.1430.941O.3240.0140.3540.012O.O1O