Upload
elaine
View
48
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Workgroup 0493: EU Gas Balancing Code - Daily Nominations at Interconnection Points (IP). Phil Lucas 1 st May 2014. Background. EU Balancing Code implementation required by October 2015 Nominations process: timescales and rejections, etc. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line.
Workgroup 0493: EU Gas Balancing Code - Daily Nominations at Interconnection Points (IP)
Phil Lucas
1st May 2014
Background
EU Balancing Code implementation required by October 2015
Nominations process: timescales and rejections, etc.
NG are not currently exercising the option to approach our NRA for a 12 month extension
EU CAM Code implementation required by November 2015
‘Single nomination’ process for bundled capacity
EU Interoperability Code in ‘comitology’ – it was expected that implementation would be required for October 2015
Nominations matching process
Data exchange
2
Framework for IP Nominations
3
EU Balancing Code
EU Capacity Allocation
Mechanism (CAM)
EU Interoperability
Code Code
ENTSOG Business Requirements Specification (BRS) for Nominations
EASEE-gas Edig@s Message Implementation Guidelines (Nominations and Matching Process)
Solution
1. New terms
2. Application
3. Nominations and Renominations – General
4. Processing of Nominations
5. Processing of Re-nominations
6. Rejection and Revision of Nominations and Renominations
7. Physical or Locational Trades at IPs
4
1. New Terms; and 2. Application
Additional terms required in new Nomination process
Rules apply in respect of each System Entry Point and Connected System Exit Point at an Interconnection Point (as now)
Transitional requirements in September 2015
For gas days up to and including 30th September 2015 – existing process
For gas days 1st October 2015 onwards – new process
5
3. Nominations and Renominations General
‘Single Sided’ and ‘Double Sided’ nominations
Communications (User to Transporter)
Acknowledgment
Quantity types – ‘Processed’ and ‘Confirmed’
Multiple nominations per User per Day
Initiating Transporter and Matching Transporter role
Matching rule publication
6
Nominations at IPs Examples
7
Example 1
User A DSN 20 kWh > < DSN 20 kWh User B
Example 2
User A DSN 5 kWh > < DSN 5 kWh User B
User A DSN 15 kWh > < DSN 15 kWh User C
Example 3
User A SSN 20 kWh > < SSN 20kWh User A
Example 4
User A SSN 20 kWh > < SSN 20kWh User AUser A DSN 15 kWh > < DSN 15 kWh User BUser A DSN 10 kWh > < DSN 10 kWh User C
UK Transporter
adjacent Transporter
IP
UK Transporter
adjacent Transporter
IP
IP
UK Transporter
adjacent Transporter
IP
UK Transporter
adjacent Transporter
4. Processing of Nominations
Submission window: D-30 to D-1 (13:00)
Default Nomination Rule – Nominated Quantity deemed to be zero in absence of User Nomination
Mandatory information requirements
Determination of Processed Quantity by NG
Notification of Confirmed Quantity: by D-1 (15:00)
8
5. Processing of Renominations
Submission window: D-1 (15:00) to D (02:00)
Negative Implied Flow rate validation
Daily nomination must not exceed the volume deemed to have already flowed at effective time of flow rate change
Mandatory information requirements
Determination of Processed Quantity by NG
Notification of Confirmed Quantity – by Hour Bar + 120 minutes
Effective time of flow rate change – Hour Bar + 120 minutes
9
Single Side Nomination Processing
10
User TSO1 (Initiating) TSO2 (Matching) User
NominationReceive Nomination
(by 13:00 / HB)
Forward Nomination(by 13:15 / HB+15)
Receive Nomination
Send TSO1 Processed Quantity(by 13:45 / HB+45)
Receive TSO1 Processed Quantity and determine TSO2
Processed Quantity
Undertake Matching process
Receive TSO2 Processed Quantity and Confirmed
Quantity
Send TSO2 Processed Quantity and Confirmed Quantity
(by 14:30 / HB+90)
Receive Confirmed QuantitySend Confirmed Quantity
(by 15:00 / HB+120)Send Confirmed Quantity
(by 15:00 / HB+120)Receive Confirmed Quantity
IP
Double Sided Nomination Processing
11
User TSO1 (Initiating) TSO2 (Matching) User
NominationReceive Nomination
(by 13:00 / HB)Receive Nomination
(by 13:00 / HB)Nomination
Send TSO1 Processed Quantity(by 13:45 / HB+45)
Receive TSO1 Processed Quantity and determine TSO2
Processed Quantity
Undertake Matching process
Receive TSO2 Processed Quantity and Confirmed
Quantity
Send TSO2 Processed Quantity and Confirmed Quantity
(by 14:30 / HB+90)
Receive Confirmed QuantitySend Confirmed Quantity
(by 15:00 / HB+120)Send Confirmed Quantity
(by 15:00 / HB+120)Receive Confirmed Quantity
IP
6. (A) Rejection
National Grid NTS may reject Nominations or Renominations:
Absence of mandatory information
Not submitted by User or its User Agent
In a Transportation Constraint, nominations above capacity entitlement
Negative value or Negative Implied Flow rate
Absence of a Double Sided Nomination to match against
Absence of matching information from Adjacent Transporter
Timing and consequence –
User notified within 120 minutes of Hour Bar
Prevailing Confirmed Quantity applies
12
6. (B) Revision
National Grid NTS may revise Processed Quantity:
In a National Grid NTS Transportation Constraint / Emergency
To match capacity entitlement
To a value deemed appropriate (Emergency only)
In the case of multiple Confirmed Quantities, the revisions will pro-rated
National Grid NTS may revise Confirmed Quantity:
Where the Adjacent Transporter has revised its Processed Quantity
13
7. Physical or Locational Trades at IPs
Confirmation lead time – Hour Bar +120 minutes
Opportunity for User to provide Renomination/s up to next Hour Bar
In absence of such Renomination/s, National Grid NTS will revise the previously determined Processed Quantity
In the case of multiple Confirmed Quantities, the revisions will pro-rated
User may subsequently revise subject to availability of Renomination process
14
Regime Comparison
15
Current Arrangements at Interconnection Points Prospective Arrangements at Interconnection Points
One type of Nomination / Renomination ‘Single Sided’ and ‘Double Sided’ Nominations and Renominations
No details of User’s counterparty at IP required Details of User’s counterparty at IP required
One Nomination per System Entry Point or Connected
System Exit Point at the IP per User
One or more Nominations per System Entry Point or Connected System Exit Point
at the IP, depending on the types of nomination used and the number of
counterparties per User
No NG NTS interaction with Adjacent Transporters at IPs NG NTS interaction with adjacent TSOs at IPs to undertake Nomination ‘matching’
process. Specification of an Initiating and Matching Transporter role.
Nomination submission period:
D-30 to D-1 13:00 (DM Output)
D-30 to D-1 14:30 (Input)
Nomination submission period:
D-30 to D-1 13:00. Note that the adjacent Transporters may not offer the same
earliest submission time.
Renomination submission period:
15:00 D-1 to 03:00 D
Renomination submission period:
15:00 D-1 to three hours prior to the end of the Gas Day
Typically 1 hour processing time Processing time up to 2 hours
Communications as per UK Link Manual / Gemini Communications as per Edig@s file formats or equivalent data format developed
by ENTSOG
Limited ability to reject a nomination (e.g. validation
failure). Application of Overrun Charges for nominations
in excess of capacity entitlement.
Additional reasons for Transporter to amend or reject a nomination. Application
of Overrun Charges for nominations in excess of capacity entitlement
Working Towards 1 October 2015
NG discussions with adjacent TSOs to agree nominations framework principles and implementation date/s - Q4 2013 onwards
The Nomination information required in the Interconnection Agreements (IA) will be included with the other EU code IA changes
NG discussions with adjacent TSOs may lead to variations to Mod 493
16
Next steps
What topics do stakeholders want NG to cover at the next Workgroup on the 22nd May?
17
Appendix
Matching Examples
18
Example 1 – “Easy” match (Double Sided Nom)
National Grid Transmission Network Adjacent Transporter's Transmission Network
User A Charges20 Capacity, 18 Commodity, 0 Overrun
User B ChargesAs per Adjacent Transporter arrangements
Interconnection Point
User A Nomination18
User A NTS Exit Capacity Entitlement20 (Unbundled)
Confirmed Quantity (to User B)18
Confirmed Quantity (to User A)18
User B Nomination18
20 (Unbundled)
18Processed Quantity MATCH
User B Entry Capacity Entitlement
Processed Quantity 18
Example 2 – “Easy” match (Single Sided Nom)
National Grid Transmission Network Adjacent Transporter's Transmission Network(In this example, the Initiating Transporter) (In this example, the Matching Transporter)
20 Capacity, 18 Commodity, 0 Overrun As per Adjacent Transporter arrangements
Forwarded by National Grid
Confirmed Quantity (to User A) Confirmed Quantity (to User B)18 18
User A Charges User A Charges
20 (Bundled) 20 (Bundled)
Processed Quantity MATCH Processed Quantity 18 18
User A NTS Exit Capacity Entitlement User A Entry Capacity Entitlement
Interconnection Point
User A Nomination User A Nomination (forwarded)18 18
Example 3 – “Easy” match (Multiple Double Sided Nom)
National Grid Transmission Network Adjacent Transporter's Transmission Network
* one single Capacity Charge levied for 20 units, one single Commodity Charge levied for 20 units
15 Capacity*, 15 Commodity*, 0 Overrun As per Adjacent Transporter arrangements
Confirmed Quantity (to User A) Confirmed Quantity (to User C)15 15
User A Charges User C Charges
User A NTS Exit Capacity Entitlement User C Entry Capacity Entitlement20 (Unbundled) 15 (Unbundled)
Processed Quantity MATCH Processed Quantity 15 15
5 Capacity*, 5 Commodity*, 0 Overrun As per Adjacent Transporter arrangements
User A Nomination 2 User C Nomination15 15
Confirmed Quantity (to User A) Confirmed Quantity (to User B)5 5
User A Charges User B Charges
20 (Unbundled) 5 (Unbundled)
Processed Quantity MATCH Processed Quantity 5 5
User A NTS Exit Capacity Entitlement User B Entry Capacity Entitlement
Interconnection Point
User A Nomination 1 User B Nomination5 5
Example 3 – Lesser Rule (Double Sided Nom)
National Grid Transmission Network Adjacent Transporter's Transmission Network
Rule' applies as shown here.
User A Charges20 Capacity, 15 Commodity, 0 Overrun
User B ChargesAs per Adjacent Transporter arrangements
User A NTS Exit Capacity Entitlement User B Entry Capacity Entitlement
Matching rule applied as specified
If none specified, default 'Lesser in Interconnection Agreement.
Confirmed Quantity (to User A) Confirmed Quantity (to User B)15 15
20 (Unbundled) 20 (Unbundled)
Processed Quantity NO MATCH Processed Quantity 18 15
Interconnection Point
User A Nomination User B Nomination18 15
Example 4 – Overrun (Double Sided Nom)
National Grid Transmission Network Adjacent Transporter's Transmission Network
User A NTS Exit Capacity Entitlement User B Entry Capacity Entitlement
User A Charges20 Capacity, 25 Commodity, 5 Overrun
User B ChargesAs per Adjacent Transporter arrangements
20 (Unbundled) 25 (Unbundled)
Processed Quantity MATCH Processed Quantity 25 25
Confirmed Quantity (to User A) Confirmed Quantity (to User B)25 25
Interconnection Point
User A Nomination User B Nomination25 25