1
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
JOANNA KRUPA, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 15-001602-CA-01
v.
BRANDI GLANVILLE
Defendant.
_________________________/
ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANT BRANDI GLANVILLES MOTION TO DISMISS KRUPAS COMPLAINT
AND STRIKING [SIC] THE ALLEGATIONS IN 8, 9 & 32 AND THE
REQUESTS FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST IN ALL RELIEF CLAUSES
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on June 2, 2015, on the
[Defendant] Glanvilles
Motion to Dismiss Krupas Complaint and Striking [sic] the
Allegations in 8, 9 & 32 and the
Requests for Prejudgment Interest in All Relief Clauses (Motion
to Dismiss), served February
18, 2015, Plaintiff Joanna Krupas Response In Opposition To
[Defendant Brandi] Glanvilles
Motion To Dismiss Krupas Complaint And Striking [Sic] The
Allegations In 8, 9 & 32 And
The Requests For Prejudgment Interest In All Relief Clauses
(Response and Request For Denial
of Glanvilles Motion to Dismiss), served May 28, 2015,
Glanvilles Notice of Limited
Withdrawal of Portions of Pending Motion to Dismiss the
Complaint, served May 28, 2015
(Notice of Limited Withdrawal), and Glanvilles Notice of
Supplemental Authority served
May 28, 2015 (Notice of Supplemental Authority). Present at the
hearing was Plaintiff Joanna
Krupas counsel Raymond J. Rafool, Esquire, and Defendant Brandi
Glanvilles counsel Scott
M. Zaslav, Esquire.
The Court having considered Joanna Krupas Complaint And Demand
For Jury Trial
Against Brandi Glanville (Complaint), the Motion to Dismiss, the
Response and Request For
Denial of Glanvilles Motion to Dismiss, the Notice of Limited
Withdrawal, and the Notice of
Supplemental Authority, the clarification that Mrs. Krupas
request for interest in the Relief
2
Clauses in Counts I and II of the Complaint are requests for
post-judgment interest only, and not
for prejudgment interest, and the Court having heard argument of
counsel, the Court is duly
advised in the premises. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED
the Defendant
Glanvilles Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. The Defendant Glanville
shall answer the
Complaint on or before June 22, 2015.
The Court sua sponte does strike the second to last paragraph on
page two (2) of Mrs.
Krupas correspondence to the Defendant dated January 6, 2015,
and attached to the Complaint
as Exhibit A as the notification provisions in Fla. Stat. 770.01
are not required in this action.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida, on
06/09/15.
_______________________________ JERALD BAGLEY CIRCUIT COURT
JUDGE
No Further Judicial Action Required on THIS
MOTION
CLERK TO RECLOSE CASE IF POST
JUDGMENT
The parties served with this Order are indicated in the
accompanying 11th Circuit email confirmation which includes all
emails provided by the submitter. The movant shall IMMEDIATELY
serve a true and correct copy of this Order, by mail, facsimile,
email or hand-delivery, to all parties/counsel of record for whom
service is not indicated by the accompanying 11th Circuit
confirmation, and file proof of service with the Clerk of Court.
Signed original order sent electronically to the Clerk of Courts
for filing in the Court file.
___________________________________
HONORABLE JERALD BAGLEY
Circuit Court Judge
Copies furnished to:
Raymond J. Rafool, Esquire
