Upload
marlo
View
20
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Water infusion and drug effusion in drug release polymers and drug diffusion in mucosae and muscle. A S Clough, F E Gauntlett, M S Rihawy University of Surrey M Braden, M P Patel, QMW, London J Booth, Astra- Zeneca, Macclesfield A Cruchley, Royal London and St Barts Hospital. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Water infusion and drug effusion in drug release polymers and drug diffusion in mucosae and muscle
A S Clough, F E Gauntlett, M S RihawyUniversity of Surrey
M Braden, M P Patel, QMW, LondonJ Booth, Astra- Zeneca, Macclesfield
A Cruchley, Royal London and St Barts Hospital
University of SurreyGuildford
SurreyEngland
Outline of Talk
• ION BEAM MICRO-ANALYSIS OF DIFFUSION• WATER INGRESS INTO AND DRUG EGRESS
FROM IN-MOUTH POLYMERS• WATER INGRESS INTO AND DRUG EGRESS
FROM CYLINDRICAL IN-BODY POLYMERS• DRUG INGRESS INTO ORAL MUCOSAE• DRUG DIFFUSION IN MUSCLE• FUTURE WORK.
Ion Beam Analysis at Surrey 2 Years agoAccelerator: 2MV Van de Graaff Ion source: 3HeScanning Micro-beam : Beam size 10m to 200m Beam current - nA to A
Beam scan of up to 3mm 3mm.
Magnet
Computer controlled raster scanned deflection plates
Quadrupole focussing magnets
V de G Objectaperture
LN2 cooled sample stage
Scanning microbeam target chamber
Side view Front view of sample stage
Particle detectors
LN2 cooled sample stage
Focussed 3He scanning microbeam
X-ray detector
Scanning zone
Cu blocks
Sample
Scanning Microbeam Target Chamber
•NRA (Nuclear Reaction Analysis)
Protons detected from the reaction:
3He + d p + Q = 18.4 MeV
•Rutherford BackScattering (RBS)
•PIXE (Particle Induced X-ray Emission)
Water and drug profiles following water ingress into in-mouth planar polymers
Water uptake and drug release have been characterised for:
• chlorhexidine diacetate drug loadings of 0%,4.5%,9% and 15% of dry weight polymer
• 3 polymers – Addition Cured silicone, Condensation Cured silicone and PEM/THFM
• 2 immersion solutions – 90% pure H2O/10%D2O and 90% PBS/10%D2O
• a series of 7 immersion times from 1 hour to 6 months
using three techniques:
scanning 3He ion microbeam NRA ,PIXE and backscattering to profile the water ingress, correlate water and drug distributions and enable inter-sample normalisation
gravimetric measurements to establish absolute normalisation of water uptake
UV measurements to establish mass of drug released to immersion solution.
Sample Preparation
• Mix drug and silicone polymer, press into oblongs 20 mm 10 mm ~1 mm.
• Immerse in 50 ml water (10% D2O/ 90%H2O) or buffer solution (10% D2O/ 90% Buffer solution) at 37C
• Remove, hold between copper blocks on sample plate, cut section at the block height; plunge in LN2
• Mount sample plate on LN2 cooled sample stage and do 3He beam scan
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 33 65 97 129 161 193 225 257 289 321 353 385 417 449 481 513 545
Ln counts
Channel Number
ProtonsAlphas
RBS
NRA Spectrum
Drug-containing silicone polymer exposed to 90%H2O/10% D2O at 37C
Cu ClSiAl
Example of an addition-cured polymer PIXE spectrum, drug loading 4.5%, PBS immersion time 1 hour,
displayed using a square vertical scale.
9% Drug loaded Addition Polymers, 2w exposure to PBS at 37 C
RBS Silicon X-rays Cl X-rays Protons from Deuterium
0
50
100
150
200
-0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3
Polymer thickness (mm)
Rel co
nc (
arb
un
its)
1-d Diffusion Profiles of Water from 90%H2O/10%D2O
Addition cured Polymer
Condensation Cured Polymer
PEMA/THFM
0
25
50
80 130 180 230D i s t a n c e a c r o s s p o l y m e r ( m m )
0
25
50
75
100
60 110 160 210 260D I s t a n c e a c r o s s p o l y m e r ( m m )
0
25
50
60 110 160 210 260
D I s t a n c e a c r o s s p o l y m e r ( m m )
1 h
2 4 h
3 3 6 h
4 0 3 6 h
1-d water diffusion profiles from 90%PBS/10%D2O
Addition Cured Polymer
Condensation Cured Polymer
PEMA/THFM
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 50 100
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
Wat
er u
pta
ke a
s a
per
cen
tag
e o
f p
oly
mer
mas
s
9% CondensationWater9% CondensationPBS
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
Wat
er u
pta
ke a
s a
per
cen
tag
e o
f in
itia
l p
oly
mer
mas
s
9% Addition Water9%Addition PBS
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 20 40 60 80
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
Wate
r u
pta
ke a
s a
perc
en
tag
e o
f p
oly
mer
mass
9% PEM/THFMWater9% PEM/THFMPBS
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100
Time1/2 (Hours1/2)
fracti
on
of
ori
gin
al d
rug
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 20 40 60 80
Time1/2 (Hours1/2)
0
5
10
15
20
0 20 40 60 80
Time1/2 (Hours1/2)
Addition Cured Silicone Condensation Cured Silicone PEMA/THFM
0
4
8
12
16
0 20 40 60 80
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
9% PEM/THFMWater
0
60
120
180
0 20 40 60 80Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
9% CondensationWater
=
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 20 40 60 80
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
Wat
er u
ptak
e %
of i
nitia
l po
lym
er m
ass
9% Add H2O
Drug Release and Water Uptake from 90%H2O/10%D2O at 37C
Addition Cured Condensation Cured PEMA/THFM
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 20 40 60 80
Time1/2 (Hours1/2)
Perc
en
tag
e o
f o
rig
inal d
rug
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 20 40 60 80
Time1/2 (Hours1/2)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 20 40 60 80
Time1/2 (Hours1/2)
0
1
2
3
0 20 40 60 80
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
Wat
er u
ptak
e as
a p
erce
ntag
e of
in
itial
pol
ymer
mas
s
9% Addition PBS
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 20 40 60 80Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
9% CondensationPBS
0
1.5
3
4.5
0 20 40 60 80
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
9% PEM/THFM PBS
Drug Release and Water uptake from 90% PBS/10%D2O at 37C
Percentage of Original Drug released to the PBS from a 9% Drug Loaded Condensation Cured
Silicone Polymer
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 20 40 60 80Time1/2 (Hours1/2)
% o
f Dru
g R
elea
sed
-25.0000
-20.0000
-15.0000
-10.0000
-5.0000
0.0000
5.0000
0 20 40 60 80
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
% of original polymermass lost
Cylindrical Polymer/Drug Depots
• Solid cylindrical depots (2.25 mm in diameter) of poly(dl-lactide) P(DL)LA loaded with goserelin in ratios of 20%, 30% and 40% by weight respectively were prepared by melt extrusion of drug/polymer mixtures.
• Many sections 18 mm long were cut, weighed and immersed in separate glass jars containing 45ml buffer solution mixed with 5ml D2O. These were held at a constant temperature of 37C for times between 1 hr and 7 days.
• On removal they were dried lightly with filter paper, weighed and cut into sections 3mm long. These were transferred to the sample plate, held at liquid nitrogen temperature and subsequently scanned with the 3He ion microbeam – energy 1.3 MeV, diameter 10 microns, current ~ 1nA.
20%
30%
40%
1 Hour 4 Hours 1 Day 4 Days 7 Days
Cylindrical Polymers – colour scale normalised to 7 day 30% data
1hr 4hr 1d 4d 7d
Water diffusion into 40% drug loaded cylindrical drug-release polymer from 90% PBS/ 10% D2O at 37C – colour scale normalised to 1d data
0,000
0,010
0,020
0,030
0,040
0,050
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Immersion time (days)
Wat
er u
ptak
e (g
)
20%
30%
40%
Water Uptake of Drug Depots for Different Immersion Times
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Immersion time (days)
Frac
tiona
l wei
ght c
hang
e (%
)
20%
30%
40%
Fractional Weight increase of Polymer after immersion
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Immersion time (days)
Frac
tion
of d
rug
rele
ased
(%)
20%
30%
40%
Fraction of Drug Released
Ion Beam Analysis at Surrey TodayPresent Accelerator: 2MV TandetronIon source: 3He, 4He or protonsScanning Microbeam : Beam size 1m to 200m Beam current - nA to A
Beam scan of up to 2.5mm 2.5mm.
Magnet
Computer controlled raster scanner deflection plates
Quadrupole focussing magnets
Tandetron Magnet Objectaperture
LN2 cooled sample stage
Scanning microbeam target chamber
External Scanning microbeam (~ 10 microns spot size)
Nano beam (~10 nm spot size) under construction
Drug diffusion in pig mucosa
• Mucosa exposed to 10% solution of chlorhexidine sulphate in water for 90 minutes
• Cut perpendicular to surface, backcooled with LN2, and scanned by 2 MeV, 2 micron spot size, proton microbeam.
• Characteristic X-rays detected.
Reservoir of test compound
Threaded collar allows tightening of
chamber without disturbing tissue
Outlet portTissueInlet port
Teflon chamber
Viewing port allows air bubbles to be checked for.
Cover slip prevents evaporation of test
compound.
Flow Through Chamber
Cross-section of mucosal epithelium
Cl distribution after 90 min exposure to chlorhexidine sulphate solution
K distribution after 90 min exposure to chlorhexidinesulphate solution
Direction of Chlorhexidine ingress
Chlorhexidine uptake distribution in mucosae for a dose time of 90 minutes.
0
1020
3040
5023
21.5 20
18.5 17
15.5 14
12.5 11 9.5
86.5
53.5
20.5 -1
-2.5
Depth (microns)
Chlo
rine X
-ray
coun
ts
Fluorinated Drug Diffusion in porcine muscle tissue
Problem: Detecting fluorine at pp104 with microbeam currents (100pA) and spatial resolution of 1 micron
Solution: Use 3.2 MeV ions and the reaction :
19F (p, ) 16O*
Characteristic 6.05 MeV -rays detected with high efficiency hyper-pure Germanium detector
-Energy (MeV)
N
Spectrum of -rays from 19F (p, ) 16O*
Fluorine Ingress Profile
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 50 100 150 200 250
distance (mm)
no
rmal
ised
co
un
ts
Work in progressDiffusion of drugs that contain either fluorine or chlorine or are deuterated into different biological tissues
Diffusion of water(labelled with deuterium) at low concentration into resins and polymer films
Diffusion of chlorine and water into cements, mortars and concrete
Development of nano-beam and associated detectors
Reactions Detected:(iii) p + 11B + 8Be Q=8.582 MeV
Sensitivity Estimate : parts per 105
Spatial Resolution of Microbeam : ~ 1m
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Energy (MeV)
Co
un
tsRBS
Reactions Detected:(ii) p + 19F + 16O Q=8.114 MeV
Sensitivity Estimate : parts per 104
Spatial Resolution of Microbeam : ~ 1m
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Energy (MeV)
Co
un
tsRBS
RBS Pile-up
• Connected in 3 groups of 4 detectors
• Outputs are summed together
The CdZnTe ArrayThe CdZnTe Array
Reactions Detected:(i) 3He + D + p Q=18.352 MeV
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1.5 4 6.5 9 11.5 14
Energy (MeV)
Co
un
ts
Sensitivity Estimate : parts per 104
Spatial Resolution of Microbeam : ~ 1m
p
• can absorb the full energy of protons up to ~15MeV
• pin connected to the front of the detector is earthed, via a thin (50-100nm) platinum contact layer diffused onto the crystal surface
•15mm x 15mm x 3mm
• other pin for signal
The CdZnTe DetectorsThe CdZnTe Detectors
The array is located ~1cm upstream of the target and subtends a useful solid angle of ~/2 steradians (1/8 sphere).
(We are improving it to allow a solid angle coverage of steradians).
ION BEAM
Cutaway View:Cutaway View:
Array Solid AngleArray Solid Angle
Addition 0% for various times in 90% H2O/10% D2O
0
50
100
150
200
-0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3
mm
wate
r co
ncen
trati
on
(arb
itra
ry u
nit
s)
1 week
24 weeks
15 minutes
24 hours
Water Uptake of the Addition Cured Silicone Polymer Loaded with 0% Drug by weight for different immersion times in PBS (90%H2O/ 10%D2O)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Distance (mm)
Wat
er c
onc.
(arb
itrar
y un
its)
2 weeks
1 Day
4 Weeks
24 Weeks
2-d maps showing diffusion of deuterated water into a planar glass sample - Scott 8330 exposed to 300 C D2O
Deuterium map Si X-ray map
Cu RBS map
X-ray spectrum
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 1 2 3 4
Energy (keV)
Cou
nts
Si from polymer matrix
Cu from Cu blocks
Drug –free polymer exposed to water at 37C
3He
backscatters
Addition 9% for various times in 90% H2O/ 10% D2O
0
50
100
150
200
-0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3
mm
Wat
er c
on
cen
trat
ion
(ar
bit
rary
un
its) 15 minutes
1 week
24 weeks
24 hours
1d profile:
Addition 4.5% for various times in 90% H2O/ 10% D2O
0
50
100
150
200
-0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3
mm
wate
r co
ncen
trati
on
(arb
itra
ry u
nit
s)
1 week
24 weeks
15 minutes
Addifiton 15% for various times in 90% H2O/10% D2O
0
50
100
150
200
-0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3
mm
Wate
r co
ncen
trati
on
(arb
itra
ry u
nit
s)
1 week
24 weeks
15 minutes
24 hours
Water Uptake of the Addition Cured Silicone Polymer Loaded with 4.5% Drug by weight for different immersion times in PBS (90%H2O/ 10%D2O)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Distance (mm)
wate
r conc. (
arb
units)
2 Weeks
1 Days
4 Weeks
24 Weeks
Water Uptake of the Addition Cured Silicone Polymer Loaded with 9% Drug by weight for different immersion times in PBS (90%H2O/ 10%D2O)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Distance across polymer (mm)
Wate
r conc. (
arb
itra
ry u
nits)
2 Weeks
1 Day
4 Weeks
24 Weeks
Water Uptake of the Addition Cured Silicone Polymer Loaded with 15% Drug by weight for different immersion times in PBS (90%H2O/ 10%D2O)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
mm
Wate
r conc. (
arb
itra
ry u
nits)
2 Weeks
1 days
4 Weeks
24 Weeks
Cl/Si X-ray ratio for 9% Addition and 9% Condensation Polymers
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
time1/2 (hours1/2)
Cl/S
i X-r
ay r
atio
9% Condensation Polymer
9% Addition Polymer
Cl/Si Ratio for Addition-Cured Polymer
0
0.0038
0.0076
0.0114
0.0152
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time1/2 (hours1/2)
Cl X
-ray/S
i X
-ray In
ten
sit
y R
ati
o
15%
9%
4.50%
0%
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Radial distance (mm)
Ab
so
lute
co
nc
en
tra
tio
n o
f w
ate
r (g
cm
-3)
1 hour
4 hours
1 day
4 days
7 days
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Radial distance (mm)
Ab
so
lute
co
nc
en
tra
tio
n o
f w
ate
r (g
cm
-3) 1 hour
4 hours
1 day
4 days
7 days
Graph Showing the % Drug Mass Released and % Polymer Mass Loss for the Condensation Cured Silicone Polymer at a drug loading of 9% for Varying Immersion Times in a PBS Solution
-12.0000
-10.0000
-8.0000
-6.0000
-4.0000
-2.0000
0.0000
2.0000
4.0000
6.0000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
% of original drug released
% of original polymer mass lost
Graph Showing the % Polymer Mass Loss for the Condensation Cured Silicone Polymer at a drug
loading of 9% for Varying Immersion Times in a PBS Solution
-25.0000
-20.0000
-15.0000
-10.0000
-5.0000
0.0000
5.0000
0 20 40 60 80
Immersion Time^1/2 (hours^1/2)
% of original polymermass lost
S distribution after 90 min exposure to chlorhexidine sulphate solution
P distribution after 90 min exposure to chlorhexidine sulphate solution
Cl distribution after 90 min exposure to chlorhexidine sulphate solution
S distribution after 90 min exposure to chlorhexidine sulphate solution
Direction of Chlorhexidine ingress