34
Quantitative Risk Assessment Walking through Simplified Example

Walking Through Simplified QRA Examples

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Quantitative Risk Assessment

Citation preview

  • Quantitative Risk AssessmentWalking through Simplified Example

  • What Would You Learn From This Exercise?Elements of Risk Quantification Risk = Frequency * Consequence

  • (1) Frequency AssessmentHazard IdentificationFrequency Assessmentbase-line frequencymagnitude-frequency 40 m80 m100 mGradient = 1:2(a) Hillside susceptible to landslides(b) Probable landslide volumes and frequencySectionPlan

    Landslide Volume (m3)

  • (1) Frequency AssessmentHazard IdentificationFrequency Assessmentbase-line frequencymagnitude-frequency 80 m100 mABCDEach Hillside Unit Area = 100 m2

    Landslide Volume (m3)

  • (1) Frequency AssessmentHazard IdentificationFrequency Assessmentbase-line frequencymagnitude-frequency

  • (1) Frequency AssessmentHazard IdentificationFrequency Assessmentbase-line frequencymagnitude-frequency

  • (2) Consequence AssessmentABCDConsequence AssessmentRunout distanceProximityVulnerability factorsFacility at riskPopulation at riskTable in C.2

  • (2) Consequence AssessmentAB

  • (2) Consequence AssessmentAB

  • (2) Consequence AssessmentABCDConsequence AssessmentRunout distanceProximityVulnerability factorsFacility at riskPopulation at risk

  • (2) Consequence Assessment

  • (2) Consequence Assessment

  • (2) Consequence AssessmentABCDConsequence AssessmentRunout distanceProximityVulnerability factorsFacility at riskPopulation at risk

  • (2) Consequence Assessment

  • (2) Consequence Assessment

  • (2) Consequence Assessment

  • (2) Consequence AssessmentLarge ScaleSmall Scale

  • (2) Consequence Assessment

  • (2) Consequence Assessment

  • (2) Consequence AssessmentABCDConsequence AssessmentFacility at riskPopulation at riskProximityRunout distanceVulnerability factors

  • (2) Consequence AssessmentABCDConsequence AssessmentFacility at riskPopulation at riskProximityRunout distanceVulnerability factors

  • (2) Consequence Assessment

  • (3) Risk EvaluationABCDRisk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveRisk dist.Risk TolerabilityCost-benefitRisk Mitigation

  • (3) Risk Evaluation

  • (3) Risk Evaluation

  • (3) Risk Evaluation

  • (3) Risk EvaluationRisk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveCost-benefitRisk ManagementDifferent Fatality Scenarios Risk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveRisk dist.Risk TolerabilityCost-benefitRisk Mitigation

  • (3) Risk EvaluationRisk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveCost-benefitRisk ManagementDifferent Fatality Scenarios Risk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveRisk dist.Risk TolerabilityCost-benefitRisk Mitigation

  • (3) Risk EvaluationRisk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveCost-benefitRisk ManagementDifferent Fatality Scenarios Risk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveRisk dist.Risk TolerabilityCost-benefitRisk Mitigation

  • (3) Risk EvaluationRisk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveRisk dist.Risk TolerabilityCost-benefitRisk Mitigation

  • (3) Risk Evaluation

  • (3) Risk EvaluationRisk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveRisk dist.Risk TolerabilityCost-benefitRisk MitigationABCD

  • (3) Risk EvaluationRisk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveRisk dist.Risk TolerabilityCost-benefitRisk Mitigation> 10-4 UNACCEPTABLEReference:Interim Risk Guideline (ERM, 1998)

  • (3) Risk EvaluationRisk AnalysisPIRPLLF-N curveRisk dist.Risk TolerabilityCost-benefitRisk MitigationReference: Interim Risk Guideline (ERM, 1998)Stabilization of Zones A to DSoil nailing at 1 m vertical and 1.5 m horizontal spacing:

    No. of nails 7 x 20 = 140 Cost $5000 x 140= HK$ 0.7 M