View on Mobile or Online - Nanonano.xjtu.edu.cn/__local/B/32/76/84115F3EC603DF0C0DC284...View the list Subject: Congratulaons, Highly Cited Researcher! From: Clarivate Analycs

View the list

Subject: Congratula ons, Highly Cited Researcher!

From: Clarivate Analy cs <[email protected]>

Date: 11/27/2018, 8:00 AM

To: <[email protected]>

View on Mobile or Online

Congratulations on being named a Highly Cited Researcher for 2018You are among an elite group recognized for exceptional researchperformance demonstrated by production of multiple highly cited papers thatrank in the top 1% by citations for field and year in Web of Science.

The distinction you have earned derives not from Clarivate Analytics but fromyour peers, who have time and again acknowledged the influence of yourresearch contributions in their publications and citations.

View the Highly Cited Researchers 2018 list.

Now that you have been identified as a Highly Cited Researcher, you maywish to share this accomplishment.

Your personalized digital certificate is waiting for you on Publons(what’s this?). Sign-in using your existing credentials or create a newprofile by following this link. (It will take up to 24 hours after logging in toappear on your profile.)

Access this promotional kit to showcase your achievement as a Highly

Congratulations, Highly Cited Researcher!

1 of 2 11/27/2018, 5:31 PM

Follow us:

ClarivateAccelerating innovation

1500 Spring Garden StreetFourth FloorPhiladelphiaPA 19130 USA

© 2018 Clarivate AnalyticsUnsubscribe from all communications

Manage your email preferencesPrivacy policy

Cited Researcher on your institution’s website, social accounts, or otherwebsites.

Add this badge to your website, social profiles and email signature.

Share the news! Share a photo of yourself, something related to yourresearch, or your HCR badge on social media using the hashtag#HighlyCited2018. We’ll be sure to spread the message on our socialaccounts. This is a great way to connect with other HCRs and get theword out about your accomplishment!

Once again, congratulations. We wish you continued success.

Best regards,

Annette ThomasCEO, Web of Science GroupClarivate Analytics

Congratulations, Highly Cited Researcher!

2 of 2 11/27/2018, 5:31 PM

11/27/2018 Highly Cited Researchers - The Most Influential Scientific Minds

https://hcr.clarivate.com/?utm_campaign=EM_Highly_Cited_Researchers_Product_SAR_Global_2018_Email_1&utm_medium=email&utm_source=… 1/22

Highly Cited Researchers 2018This list recognizes world-class researchers selected for their exceptional research

performance, demonstrated by production of multiple highly cited papers that rank in the top1% by citations for field and year in Web of Science.

Download Executive Summary

MIT

Filter categories

Clear all

Agricultural Sciences

Biology & Biochemistry

Chemistry

Clinical Medicine

Computer Science

Economics & Business

Engineering

Environment/Ecology

Geosciences

Immunology

Materials Science

Mathematics

Acemoglu Daron

Economics & BusinessMITUnited States

Amit Raphael

Economics & BusinessUniv PennUnited States

Arrowsmith Cheryl H.

Cross-FieldUniv Toronto

Highly Cited Researchers

http://discover.clarivate.com/hcr-2018-exec-summary?utm_campaign=EM_Highly_Cited_Researchers_Product_SAR_Global_2018_Email_1&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua

https://hcr.clarivate.com/



Microbiology

Molecular Biology & Genetics

Neuroscience & Behavior

Pharmacology & Toxicology

Physics

Plant & Animal Science

Psychiatry/Psychology

Social Sciences, general

Space Science

Cross-Field

Canada

Autor David H.


Baleanu Dumitru

MathematicsCankaya UnivTurkeyInst Space Science Magurele, Romania

Bartel David P.

Molecular Biology & GeneticsMITUnited StatesHoward Hughes Med Inst, United States

Basov Dimitri N.

PhysicsColumbia UnivUnited States

Bawendi Moungi G.


https://publons.com/a/1226760/

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-9936-2012

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0286-7244

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-2856

https://infrared.cni.columbia.edu/basov/




g

Cross-FieldMITUnited States

Bhatia Sangeeta N.


Bhatnagar Amit

Cross-FieldUniv East FinlandFinland

Boyden Edward S.


Buchwald Stephen L.

ChemistryMITUnited States

Buehler Markus J.


http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-8838-2008

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3565-9943

http://www.uef.fi/en/web/water-research/bhatnagar-amit

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/D-3527-2009





Bullmore Edward T.

Neuroscience & BehaviorUniv CambridgeUnited KingdomGlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom

Bullmore Edward T.

Psychiatry/PsychologyUniv CambridgeUnited KingdomGlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom

Bulovic Vladimir

PhysicsMITUnited States

Chen Gang

Materials ScienceMITUnited States


http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-4580-2008

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-9659



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-8283



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-8283

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/J-1325-2014

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3968-8530




Chen Gang


Collins James J.


Dermitzakis Emmanouil T.

Molecular Biology & GeneticsUniv GenevaSwitzerland

Dinca Mircea


Doumith Michel



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3968-8530


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3968-8530

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=te5DjPQAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1262-1264




Pharmacology & ToxicologyPublic Hlth EnglandUnited Kingdom

Dowsett Mitch

Clinical MedicineBreast Canc NowUnited KingdomRoyal Marsden Hosp, United Kingdom

Dresselhaus Mildred S.


Du�y J. Emmett

Environment/EcologySmithsonian InstUnited States

Duflo Esther

Economics & BusinessMITUnited StatesNatl Bur Econ Res, United States

Eisenstein Daniel J.

Space ScienceHarvard-Smithsonian Ctr Astrophysics





p yUnited States

Etkin Amit

Psychiatry/PsychologyStanford UnivUnited States

Fischl Bruce

Neuroscience & BehaviorHarvard UnivUnited StatesMIT, United States

Fu Liang


Gabrilovich Dmitry I.

ImmunologyWistar InstUnited StatesUniv Penn, United States

Garg Amit X.

Cross-FieldLondon Hlth Sci Ctr


https://wistar.org/our-scientists/dmitry-gabrilovich




Canada

Ghosh Amitava

Computer ScienceNokiaFinland

Golberg Dmitri

Materials ScienceQueensland Univ TechnolAustraliaNIMS, Japan

Goudsmit Jaap

MicrobiologyJanssen Biotech IncUnited States

Guarente L


Hammond Paula T.

Cross-FieldMiTUnited States



http://www.researcherid.com/rid/H-2776-2011

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-6539




Hernan Miguel A.

Social Sciences, generalHarvard UnivUnited StatesMIT, United States

Hernquist Lars

Space ScienceHarvard-Smithsonian Ctr AstrophysicsUnited States

Jacks Tyler


Jaenisch Rudolf

Biology & BiochemistryWhitehead InstUnited StatesMIT, United States

Jaenisch Rudolf

Molecular Biology & GeneticsWhitehead InstUnited StatesMIT, United States





Jarillo-Herrero P.


Johnson Toby

Molecular Biology & GeneticsGlaxoSmithKlineUnited Kingdom

Kellis Manolis

Biology & BiochemistryMITUnited StatesBroad Inst, United States

Kellis Manolis

Molecular Biology & GeneticsMITUnited StatesBroad Inst, United States

Kong Jing



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-3270




Kontoyiannis Dimitrios P.

Cross-FieldUniv Texas MD Anderson Canc CtrUnited States

Krebs-Smith Susan M.

Agricultural SciencesNIH Natl Canc InstUnited States

Lander Eric S.

Clinical MedicineBroad InstUnited StatesHarvard Univ, United States; MIT, United States

Lander Eric S.

Molecular Biology & GeneticsBroad InstUnited StatesHarvard Univ, United States; MIT, United States

Langer Robert S.

Biology & BiochemistryMITUnited States





Langer Robert S.


Langer Robert S.

Pharmacology & ToxicologyMITUnited States

Li Ju


Lippard Stephen J.


Mikhailidis Dimitri P.

Pharmacology & ToxicologyUniv Coll LondonUnited Kingdom

Mitchell Alex J



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-8058

http://li.mit.edu/





Mitchell Alex J.

Psychiatry/PsychologyUniv LeicesterUnited Kingdom

Mitchell Paul

Cross-FieldUniv SydneyAustralia

Mitchell Richard

Social Sciences, generalUniv GlasgowUnited Kingdom

Mitragotri Samir

Pharmacology & ToxicologyHarvard UnivUnited States

Mittal Alok

EngineeringMaulana Azad Natl Inst Tech BhopalIndia



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6014-598X

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/P-1498-2014

https://www.gla.ac.uk/researchinstitutes/healthwellbeing/staff/richmitchell/


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-0977

http://www.manit.ac.in/content/dr-alok-mittal




Mittal Jyoti

Cross-FieldMaulana Azad Natl Inst Tech BhopalIndia

Mittler Ron

Plant & Animal ScienceUniv N Texas SystemUnited States

Mitzi David B.

Materials ScienceDuke UnivUnited States

Neve Rachael L.

Neuroscience & BehaviorMITUnited States

Orlikowski Wanda J.




http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-3815


http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5189-4612

https://mems.duke.edu/faculty/david-mitzi




Palacios Tomas


Polli J. W.

Pharmacology & ToxicologyGlaxoSmithKlineUnited States

Rakopoulos Dimitrios C.

EngineeringCtr Res Technol HellasGreeceNatl Tech Univ Athens, Greece

Sabatini David M.

Molecular Biology & GeneticsWhitehead InstUnited StatesHoward Hughes Med Inst, United States; MIT, United States

Sasselov Dimitar

Cross-FieldHarvard-Smithsonian Ctr AstrophysicsUnited States



https://www.linkedin.com/in/dimitrios-rakopoulos-b392b848




Schwaber Mitchell J.

Cross-FieldTel Aviv UnivIsrael

Seo Mitsunori

Plant & Animal ScienceRIKENJapan

Shao-Horn Yang


Sharp Phillip A.


Shatanawi Wasfi

MathematicsChina Med Univ TaiwanTaiwanHashemite Univ, Jordan


http://www.researcherid.com/rid/N-9603-2015



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7492-4933




Smit Johannes H.

Cross-FieldVU Univ AmsterdamNetherlands

Smith Albert Vernon

Molecular Biology & GeneticsUniv MichiganUnited StatesUniv Iceland, Iceland

Smith David L.

Cross-FieldNIH Natl Canc InstUnited States

Smith David R.

PhysicsDuke UnivUnited States

Smith Derek J.

MicrobiologyUniv Cambridge


http://www.researcherid.com/rid/K-5150-2015

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1942-5845

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/L-8850-2013

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4367-3849

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/E-4710-2012




United Kingdom

Smith F. Andrew

Cross-FieldUniv AdelaideAustralia

Smith George Davey

Molecular Biology & GeneticsUniv BristolUnited Kingdom

Smith George Davey

Social Sciences, generalUniv BristolUnited Kingdom

Smith Melinda D.

Environment/EcologyColorado State UnivUnited States

Smith Pete

Agricultural SciencesUniv AberdeenUnited Kingdom







United Kingdom

Smith Sally E.

Cross-FieldUniv AdelaideAustralia

Smith Sidney C.

Clinical MedicineUniv N CarolinaUnited States

Smith Stephen A.

Cross-FieldUniv MichiganUnited States

Smith Stephen M.

Neuroscience & BehaviorUniv OxfordUnited Kingdom

Smith Steven J.

Cross-FieldPacific NW Natl Lab


http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-1041-2010

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-1124

http://www.abdn.ac.uk/ibes/people/profiles/pete.smith


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2035-9531

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8166-069X




Pacific NW Natl LabUnited States

Sogin Mitchell L.

Cross-FieldMarine Biol LabUnited States

Stephanopoulos Gregory

Biology & BiochemistryMITUnited States

Strano Michael S.


Talapin Dmitri V.

Cross-FieldUniv ChicagoUnited StatesArgonne Natl Lab, United States

Tonegawa Susumu

Cross-Field


http://srg.mit.edu/

http://talapinlab.uchicago.edu/




MITUnited States

Trichopoulos Dimitrios

Social Sciences, generalHarvard UnivUnited States

Tsai Li-Huei


Tye Kay M.


1 2


© 2018 HCR

Copyright notice



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-0182

https://hcr.clarivate.com/copyright-notice/




Follow us

Terms of use

Privacy statement

Cookie policy


https://twitter.com/webofscience

https://www.facebook.com/webofscience.clarivate/

https://hcr.clarivate.com/terms-of-use/

https://hcr.clarivate.com/privacy-statement/

https://hcr.clarivate.com/cookie-policy/



https://hcr.clarivate.com/?utm_campaign=EM_Highly_Cited_Researchers_Product_SAR_Global_2018_Email_1&utm_medium=email&utm_source=El… 1/3




MIT

Filter categories

Clear all



Chemistry

Clinical Medicine

Computer Science


Engineering

Environment/Ecology

Geosciences

Immunology

Materials Science

Mathematics

Van Reenen John

Economics & BusinessMITUnited StatesLondon Sch Econ & Polit Sci, United Kingdom

Vander Heiden Matthew G.


Voigt Christopher A.

Cross-Field


http://discover.clarivate.com/hcr-2018-exec-summary?utm_campaign=EM_Highly_Cited_Researchers_Product_SAR_Global_2018_Email_1&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua




Microbiology




Physics




Space Science

Cross-Field

MITUnited States

Wang Han


Weinberg Robert A.

Molecular Biology & GeneticsMITUnited StatesWhitehead Inst, United States

Win Moe Z.

Computer ScienceMITUnited States

Wright S. J.

Environment/EcologySmithsonian Trop Res InstPanama

Young Richard A.




http://www.researcherid.com/rid/M-3311-2013

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4260-5676




gyMITUnited StatesWhitehead Inst, United States

Zhang Feng

Biology & BiochemistryBroad InstUnited StatesMIT, United States

1 ... 2


© 2018 HCR

Follow us

Copyright notice

Terms of use

Privacy statement

Cookie policy


http://www.researcherid.com/rid/F-6495-2012

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8855-8647








Highly Cited Researchers 2018 Identifying top talent in the sciences and social sciences

2

Highly Cited Researchers are selected for their exceptional research performance, determined by production of multiple highly cited papers that rank in the top 1% by citations for field and year in Web of Science..

Of the world population of scientists and social scientists, the Clarivate Analytics Highly Cited Researchers are one in 1,000.

Web of Science | Highly Cited Researchers 2018 3

OverviewThe Clarivate Analytics list of Highly Cited Researchers for 2018 identifies scientists and social scientists who have demonstrated significant influence through publication of multiple highly cited papers during the last decade. Researchers are selected for their exceptional performance in one or more of 21 fields (those used in Essential Science Indicators (ESI)) or across several fields. Approximately 6,000 researchers are named Highly Cited Researchers in 2018 — some 4,000 in specific fields and about 2,000 for Cross-Field performance. This is the first year that researchers with Cross-Field impact are identified.

The number of researchers selected in each field is based on the square root of the population of authors listed on the field’s highly cited papers. The number of those with Cross-Field influence is determined by finding those who have influence equivalent to those identified in the 21 fields.

For the 2018 Highly Cited Researchers analysis, the papers surveyed were those published and cited during 2006- 2016 and which at the end of 2016 ranked in the top 1% by citations for their ESI field and year (the definition of a highly cited paper).

The threshold number of highly cited papers for selection differs by field, with Clinical Medicine requiring the most and Agricultural Sciences, Economics & Business, and Pharmacology & Toxicology the fewest.

A second criterion for selection is a citation count to highly cited papers that ranks a researcher in the top 1% by total citations in an ESI field for the period surveyed.

To identify researchers with Cross-Field impact, highly cited paper and citation counts are normalized through fractional counting according to the thresholds required for each field (thus, each Clinical Medicine paper has a smaller unit fraction, or counts less, than one in Agricultural Sciences). Citation counts are treated in a similar manner. If the sum of the fractional publication counts and the sum of the fractional citation counts for a researcher equals 1.0 or more, the individual exhibits influence equivalent to a researcher selected in one or more ESI defined fields and is therefore selected as a Highly Cited Researcher for exceptional Cross-Field performance.

There is no unique or universally agreed concept of what constitutes extraordinary research performance and elite status in the sciences and social sciences. Consequently, no quantitative indicators will reveal a list that satisfies all expectations or requirements. Moreover, a different basis or formula for selection would generate a different — though likely overlapping — list of names. Thus, the absence of a name on our list cannot be interpreted as inferior performance or stature in comparison to those selected. To understand both the meaning and the inevitable limitations of our analytical approach, a careful reading of the methodology is required.

https://hcr.clarivate.com/methodology/

https://hcr.clarivate.com/methodology/

4

This year, for the first time, Highly Cited Researchers introduces a new Cross-Field category to identify researchers with substantial influence across several fields during 2006-2016


Who would contest that in the race for knowledge it is human capital that is most essential? Talent — including intelligence, creativity, ambition, and social competence (where needed) — outpaces other capacities such as access to funding and facilities, although these are typically also necessities for success.

The advancement of scientific endeavor represents a critical activity for individual research institutions and entire nations.

The 2018 Highly Cited Researchers from Clarivate Analytics is a contribution to the identification of that small fraction of the researcher population that contributes disproportionately to extending the frontier and gaining for society knowledge and innovations that make the world healthier, richer, sustainable, and more secure.”

At UTS we strive for excellence in research and support our

researchers to achieve their ambitions. A critical element of their success is that their research findings attract attention and create impact within the scholarly community and more broadly for society, with the latter being significantly aided by the former, establishing the reputation of both our researchers and UTS. Clarivate’s Highly Cited Researchers List helps validate our researchers’ success, confirming the standing of our researchers and their research in their fields of specialisation. As UTS continues to grow as a research-intensive university and the number of our researchers who are recognised on the HCR List increases we increase the ability for our researchers to use their research to deliver the greatest benefits for society and to aspire our researchers to aim higher.

Kate McGrath, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research), University of Technology Sydney

Web of Science | Highly Cited Researchers 20186

In the institution of science, the tail wags the proverbial

dog. Highly Cited Researchers wield a vastly disproportionate influence on their fields.³John N. Parker (U.S. National Science Foundation and Arizona State University), Christopher Lortie (York University), and Stefano Allesina (University of Chicago)

Citations: Pellets of peer recognition

When Eugene Garfield created the first citation index for science in 1964, he did so to make searching the literature more efficient and effective. He called his creation an “association-of-ideas index.”1 And the connections he captured between topics, concepts, or methods discussed in indexed papers could be trusted, he argued, because they were based on the informed judgments of researchers themselves, as recorded in the references they appended to their papers.

Thus, the network of citations linking items in the Web of Science offers a cognitive road map for those seeking to follow the progression of a finding or advancement — a map sometimes leading to unexpected regions that can turn research in a new, promising direction.

The raison d’être of the Web of Science is and always has been to help researchers find the information they need to carry out their investigations. And today Clarivate Analytics continues the work of Garfield by providing trusted insights and analytics to enable researchers to accelerate discovery.

A secondary use of a citation index for science evolved in the decade after its introduction: analysis of research performance. Citations, when tallied and especially at high frequency, reveal influence, utility, and often significance (quality, however, requires expert judgment). In 1972, the U.S. National Science Foundation included publication and citation data in its first Science Indicators report, which permitted comparisons of national research activity, focus, performance, and growth. In the 1980s, and in

Europe particularly, publication and citation data were harvested and deployed for analysis of the research performance of universities.

New Public Management, introduced in universities in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia in the 1980s and 1990s, applied business management methods to academia and emphasized performance indicators and benchmarks. Academic scientists and social scientists, who previously roundly rejected evaluation by outsiders and insisted on traditional peer review, have gradually accepted bibliometric assessments because opportunities and rewards tied to such assessments have become institutionalized. Some researchers now list citation data on their CVs and websites, such as a total citation count or their h-index.

What citations represent and how to interpret citation statistics have been debated for many years. Some assert that they convey importance or popularity; others say they function largely as rhetorical devices and collectively create a socially constructed reality. The late Robert K. Merton, the 20th century’s leading sociologist of science, called the citation “a pellet of peer recognition.”² Citations, he said, were given as repayments of intellectual debt to others. He emphasized that citation was an essential part of normative behavior among researchers, that it was a considered, formal, and obligatory activity, one that included a moral imperative to cite others when appropriate. It is largely this perspective that supports citation analysis to identify research influence and success. In most fields, there is a moderate positive correlation between peer esteem and citation frequency of papers and people, shown in a variety of so-called validation studies.


Evaluating the research performance of individuals is the most contentious application of publication and citation data. Apart from being an emotionally charged exercise, difficulties include finding comparable researchers or research publications to enable fair comparisons, expecting that influence and impact can be detected quickly when it may require many years, and selecting appropriate indicators, ones in alignment with the agreed priorities and values of a research program. A specific hazard is false precision – making distinctions without any meaningful differences – which frequently arises in dealing with small numbers, so often encountered in analyzing the work of an individual rather than that of an institution or nation.

When, however, a researcher’s record exhibits top-tier status quantitatively, demonstrated by the production of papers in the top 1%, top .1%, or even top .01% of a citation distribution, researchers can be more certain of having positive and reliable evidence that the individual under review has contributed something of utility and even significance. Having multiple contributions of this type increases confidence in attributing significant impact to a researcher’s oeuvre.

The application of the data (or of the ESI designation “Highly Cited”) — for example in the context of appointment or promotion decisions or in awarding research funds — demands informed interpretation. One should never rely on publication and citation data as a substitute for reading and assessing a researcher’s publications — that is, for human judgement.

This perspective is consistent with two of the recommendations of the Leiden Manifesto (2015), namely:

Beyond questions of evaluation, Garfield was fascinated by the power of citations to discriminate the typical from the truly exceptional researcher. The power-law nature of the citation distribution allows one to rapidly focus on a small number of top-end ‘events,’ including papers and people. Over the years he produced many lists of most-cited researchers in almost every field of inquiry. And he took special interest in using citation data to forecast Nobel Prize winners by identifying a group of researchers he termed ‘of Nobel class.’5

The Highly Cited Researchers list from Clarivate Analytics extends Garfield’s work in recognizing investigators whose citation records position them in the top strata of influence and impact. This year’s list includes 17 Nobel laureates, including two announced this year: James P. Allison, Physiology or Medicine, and William D. Nordhaus, Economic Sciences. Also included are 56 Clarivate Analytics Citation Laureates, individuals who, through citation analysis, we have identified as researchers ‘of Nobel class’ and potential Nobel Prize recipients.

Eugene Garfield

That quantitative evaluation should support qualitative,

expert assessment,” and that “assessment of individual researchers [should be based] on a qualitative judgement of their portfolio.⁴

https://clarivate.com/2018-citation-laureates


Credit where credit is due Garfield, who passed away in February 2017, would be most gratified by those instances in which our designation of Highly Cited gave a deserving but underappreciated researcher the recognition and opportunity he or she deserved. Professor Eun-Jung Park, of Kyung Hee University, South Korea, who studies nanotoxicology and immunotoxicology, is an example.

“While I was aware that my research was being cited regularly, it was a huge surprise when an email appeared in

my inbox telling me I had been announced as a Highly Cited Researcher for 2017. It’s incredibly hard to describe how this moment felt in one word — I felt touched, elated, consoled and excited all at the same time — but most of all, I felt proud of myself.

Being recognized as a Highly Cited Researcher has triggered what can only be described as a miraculous trail of events for me over the last few months. Before the news, I was preparing to retire as a researcher. I suffer from gastritis, and I was in so much pain towards the end of last year that I was ready to give up for good — a decision I had not taken lightly. But receiving this award has spurred me on to continue with the work I’ve been doing. The enthusiasm I first felt as a researcher has now been reignited, and a whole new future lies ahead of me.”⁶

Professor Eun-Jung Park, Kyung Hee University Graduate School of East-West Medicine Science, Seoul, South Korea


Highly Cited Researchers 2018

Highly Cited Researchers from Clarivate Analytics is an annual list recognizing influential researchers in the sciences and social sciences from around the world. The 2018 list contains 6,078 Highly Cited Researchers, 4,058 in 21 fields of the sciences and social sciences and 2,020 Highly Cited Researchers identified as having exceptional performance across several fields.*

The list focuses on contemporary research achievement: only highly cited papers in science and social sciences journals indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection during the 11-year period 2006-2016 were surveyed. Highly cited papers are defined as those that rank in the top 1% by citations for field and publication year. This percentile-based selection method removes the citation advantage of older papers relative to recently published ones, since papers are weighed against others in the same annual cohort.

The data derive from Essential Science Indicators (ESI), a component of InCites. The fields are also those employed in ESI — 21 broad fields defined by sets of journals and exceptionally, in the case of multidisciplinary journals such as Nature and Science, by a paper-by-paper assignment to a field based on an analysis of the cited references in the papers.

*The number of unique Highly Cited Researchers is 5,836, including 3,816 in the ESI fields and 2,020 in the Cross-Field category. The analysis reported here is based on appearances of Highly Cited Researchers in specific fields, and a small number are selected in more than one ESI field.

Agricultural Sciences Biology & Biochemistry

Chemistry Clinical Medicine

Computer Science Economics & Business

Engineering Environment/Ecology

Geosciences Immunology

Materials Science Mathematics Microbiology

Molecular Biology & Genetics Neuroscience & Behavior

Pharmacology & Toxicology Physics

Plant & Animal Sciences Psychiatry/Psychology

Social Sciences Space Science

ESI fields


Researchers who, within an ESI-defined field, publish highly cited papers are judged to be influential, so the production of multiple top 1% papers is interpreted as a mark of exceptional impact. Relatively younger researchers are more likely to emerge in such an analysis than in one dependent on total citations over many years. To be able to recognize early and mid-career as well as senior researchers is one of the goals in generating Highly Cited Researchers lists. The determination of how many researchers to include in the list for each field is based on the population of each field, as represented by the number of disambiguated author names on all highly cited papers in that field, 2006-2016. The ESI fields vary greatly in size, with Clinical Medicine being the largest and Agricultural Sciences, Economics & Business, and Pharmacology & Toxicology the smallest in terms of researchers and number of highly cited papers produced.

One of two criteria for selection is that the researcher must have enough citations to his or her highly cited papers to rank among all authors in the top 1% by total citations in the ESI field in which that person is considered. Authors of highly cited papers who meet this criterion in a field are ranked by number of such papers, and the threshold for inclusion is determined using the square root of the population represented by the number of disambiguated authors names on the highly cited papers in a field. All who published highly cited papers at the threshold level are admitted to the list, even if the final list then exceeds the number given by the square root calculation.

In addition, and as a concession to the somewhat arbitrary cut-off, any researcher with one fewer highly cited paper than the threshold number is also admitted to the list if total citations to his or her highly cited papers rank that individual in the top 50% by total citations of those at the threshold level or higher. The justification for this adjustment is that it seems to work well in identifying influential researchers, in the judgment of Clarivate Analytics citation analysts.

Of course, there are many highly accomplished and influential researchers who are not recognized by the method described above and whose names do not appear in the 2018 list. This outcome would hold no matter what specific method were chosen for selection. Each measure or set of indicators, whether total citations, h-index, relative citation impact, mean percentile score, etc., accentuates different types of performance and achievement. Here we confront what many expect from such lists, but what is unobtainable: that there is some optimal or ultimatemethod of measuring performance. The only reasonable approach to interpreting a list of top researchers such as ours is to fully understand the method behind the data and results, and why the method is used. With that knowledge, in the end, the results may be judged by users as relevant or irrelevant to their needs or interests.

Release of the Highly Cited Researcher list by Clarivate

Analytics is a major annual event at UNSW. It is internationally respected, and now even more influential with the new cross field category embracing interdisciplinary research. HCR status is testimony to the pinnacle of achievement of our [19 selected academics in 20 fields], and such is its prestige, we recognise annually those academics who make the list at our celebration of research excellence.

Nicholas Fisk, Deputy Vice Chancellor (Research), NSW Sydney


New: Identifying researchers with Cross-Field impact

This year, for the first time, Highly Cited Researchers introduces a new Cross-Field category to identify researchers with substantial influence across several fields during 2006-2016. As mentioned above, 2,020 researchers with Cross-Field impact now join 4,058 who have been selected in one or more of 21 broad ESI fields. An increase of 50% is substantial, but 6,078 researchers still represents a very small fraction of all scientists and social scientists actively publishing today.

Since introducing Highly Cited Researchers in 2014, Clarivate Analytics has received the suggestion from many that limiting the methodology for selection to only those with a required number of highly cited papers in a single field, as defined in ESI, discriminates against researchers who publish highly cited papers in several fields but not enough in any one field to be chosen. We responded to this concern. In line with recommendations on best practice, we want to ensure that any metrics or analyses that we produce are structured and presented in a responsible manner. Extending the identification of Highly Cited Researchers to cross-disciplinary work fulfills that goal.

The challenge for us was finding a method that took account of the different threshold number of highly cited papers in each field so that those contributing papers in several fields could be compared in an equal manner with those selected in one or more ESI fields. The solution chosen was to fractionally count the credit for each highly cited paper such that a paper in a field with a high threshold number of papers was weighted less than a paper in a field with a lower threshold number of papers.

The fictional researcher Joseph Savant (Table below) published 15 highly cited papers in the period 2006-2016 in four ESI fields. Seven papers in Field 6, with a threshold number of eight for selection, earned Savant a credit of .875 (or 7/8ths). Three papers in Field 14, with a threshold number of six for selection, were worth .5. The sum of the fractional paper counts in each field yielded a total Cross-Field paper score of 1.67. A score of 1 or more indicates that the individual achieved equivalent impact to a researcher chosen in a specific ESI field.

ESI field First name

Last name

Number of HCPs

Field paper

threshold

Field paper score

Citation to HCPs

Field citation

threshold

Field citation

score

Field 3 Joseph Savant 1 22 0.045 98 1857 0.053




Cross-Field Joseph Savant 1.670 5.667

Example of Cross-Field selection methodology


The second criterion for selection as a Highly Cited Researcher is enough citations to rank in the top 1% by citations for a field. Again, citations in different fields were fractionated in a similar manner to the treatment of papers. In the example above, Professor Savant earned more than five times the number of citations needed for selection as an influential Cross-Field researcher. Both criteria had to be met for selection as a Cross-Field Highly Cited Researcher, just as required for selection in one or more ESI fields.

Traditional field definitions are useful in some contexts but less so in others. Today, an immunologist may identify herself as a biochemist and a molecular biologist. Another researcher may be hard pressed to say whether he is a chemist, materials scientist, or engineer. Breaking through the artificial walls of conventional disciplinary categories will help keep our Highly Cited Researcher list contemporary and relevant. Moreover, as frontier areas of research are frequently interdisciplinary, it is even more important to identify scientists and social scientists working and contributing substantially at the Cross-Field leading edge.

The 6,078 Highly Cited Researchers of 2018 are unevenly distributed by field, in accordance with the size of each. The table to the right summarizes the number of researchers in each ESI field and in the new Cross-Field category.

ESI field Number of Highly Cited Researchers

Agricultural Sciences 158

Biology & Biochemistry 254

Chemistry 261

Clinical Medicine 497

Computer Science 96

Economics & Business 96

Engineering 204

Environment/Ecology 185

Geosciences 184

Immunology 146

Materials Science 208

Mathematics 90

Microbiology 148

Molecular Biology & Genetics 249

Neuroscience & Behavior 197

Pharmacology & Toxicology 161

Physics 211

Plant & Animal Sciences 223

Psychiatry/Psychology 157

Social Sciences, General 211

Space Science 122

Total 4,058

Cross-Field 2,020

Grand Total 6,078

Is there a formula for managing discovery making?

…. First, and most important, are the people involved.⁷The late Nobel Laureate Ahmed H. Zewail, California Institute of Technology


Breaking through the artificial walls of conventional disciplinary categories will help keep our Highly Cited Researcher list contemporary and relevant.


The following analysis is based on primary researcher affiliations, as specified by the Highly Cited Researchers themselves.

The United States is the institutional home for 2,639 of the 2018 Highly Cited Researchers, which amounts to 43.4% of the group. By contrast, of all papers indexed in the Web of Science for 2006-2016 the percentage with a U.S. author or co-author was 27.6%. The second ranked country / region is the United Kingdom with 546 Highly Cited Researchers, or 9.0%. Mainland China follows, with 482 researchers, or 7.9% (adding Hong Kong with 51 and Macau with 5 raises the total to 538, nearly that of the UK). Next, all with 100 or more Highly Cited Researchers, we list Germany (356), Australia (245), The Netherlands (189), Canada (166), France (157), Switzerland (133), and Spain (115).

The Highly Cited Researchers represent more than 60 regions, but 82.7% of them are from just 10 and 70.2% from the first five, a remarkable concentration of top talent.

While each region pursues its own portfolio of interests, often reflected in numbers of Highly Cited Researchers in different fields, some regions appear to follow less traditional, more transdisciplinary lines of investigation, at least if their scientific elite is representative. Across the group, there are two Highly Cited Researchers in the 21 ESI fields for each in the Cross-Field category. We might expect, therefore, to see this 2:1 ratio for each region. Not so. Instead of a

third in the Cross-Field category, more than half of the Highly Cited Researchers from Sweden (53.2%) and Austria (52.5%) are recognized for high impact research spanning several areas. Nations with more than 40% of their Highly Cited Researchers selected in the Cross-Field category are Singapore (47.4%), Denmark (47.2%), Mainland China (42.7%), and South Korea (42.1%). This prompts the question: style or strategy?

Three regions have shown a notable increase in both number and percentage of Highly Cited Researchers since 2014: Singapore, Mainland China, and Australia. The following figures are based on the 21 ESI fields only, since there are no trends data for researchers in the Cross-Field category.

In 2014, we counted 17 Highly Cited Researchers from Singapore and this year 40 were named in the 21 ESI fields, for an increase of 135.3%. Mainland China increased by 126.2%, based on 122 researchers in 2014 and 276 in 2018 represented in the ESI fields. Australia was the third strongest performer, exhibiting growth of 112.5%, from 80 researchers named in 2014to 170 in the ESI fields in 2018.

By contrast, Japan declined 34.7% in number of Highly Cited Researchers named in the ESI fields, from 98 named in 2014 to 64 this year. Even when one includes the Cross-Field researchers, the total for Japan in 2018 is 90, so there has been an absolute decline in Highly Cited Researchers for the nation.

Rank Country / region Number HCRs Percent HCRs

1 United States 2,639 43.4

2 United Kingdom 546 9.0

3 China Mainland 482 7.9

4 Germany 356 5.9

5 Australia 245 4.0

6 The Netherlands 189 3.1

7 Canada 166 2.7

8 France 157 2.6

9 Switzerland 133 2.2

10 Spain 115 1.9


The university with the greatest number of Highly Cited Researchers is Harvard, with 186. Other top-ranked universities are, in order, Stanford (100), University of California Berkeley (64), Oxford (59), Cambridge (53), Washington University in St. Louis (51), University of California Los Angeles (47), University of California San Diego (47), MIT (45), University of Pennsylvania (44), and Duke (44). The total for all campuses of the University of California is 267, the most of any organization or system.

Among governmental and other types of research organizations, the US National Institutes of Health (including all individual institutes) ranks first, with 148 Highly Cited Researchers. Next is the Chinese Academy of Sciences (99), the Max Planck Society (76), the Broad Institute (44), NIH’s NIAID (39), and Brigham & Women’s Hospital (38).

Institutions* Country /region

Number HCRs

Institutions Nation Number HCRs

Harvard Univ United States 186 Univ Edinburgh United Kingdom 36

Natl Inst Hlth USA United States 148 Northwestern Univ United States 36

Stanford Univ United States 100 Cornell Univ United States 35

Chinese Acad Sciences China Mainland 99 Univ North Carolina United States 34

Max Planck Society Germany 76 Erasmus Univ Rotterdam Netherlands 34

Univ Calif Berkeley United States 64 Univ British Columbia Canada 33

Univ Oxford United Kingdom 59 Univ Melbourne Australia 33

Univ Cambridge United Kingdom 53 Mayo Clinic United States 32

Washington Univ St Louis United States 51 Yale Univ United States 31

Univ Calif Los Angeles United States 47 King Saud University Saudi Arabia 29

Univ Calif San Diego United States 47 Imperial College London United Kingdom 29

MIT United States 45 European Bioinformat Institute United Kingdom 29

Broad Institute United States 44 Univ Toronto Canada 28

Univ Penn United States 44 Univ Queensland Australia 28

Duke Univ United States 44 Univ Copenhagen Denmark 28

King Abdulaziz Univ Saudi Arabia 43 Natl Univ Singapore Singapore 28

Univ Washington United States 42 Univ Calif San Francisco United States 28

Johns Hopkins Univ United States 41 Univ Colorado United States 28

Univ College London United Kingdom 41 Swiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne Switzerland 27

Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore 40 VU Univ Amsterdam Netherlands 26

Table continues on next page


Name Primary Affiliation Fields

Pulickel M. Ajayan Rice Univ, United States Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Zhenan Bao Stanford Univ, United States Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Jinde Cao Southeast Univ, China Mainland Computer Science, Engineering, Mathematics

Yi Cui Stanford Univ, United States Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Hongjie Dai Stanford Univ, United States Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Michael Graetzel Swiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne, Switzerland Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Vinod Kumar Gupta King Abdulaziz Univ, Saudi Arabia Chemistry, Engineering, Environment/Ecology

Albert Hofman Harvard Univ, United States Clinical Medicine, Molecular Biology, Social Sciences

Frank B. Hu Harvard Univ, United States Agricultural Sciences, Clinical Medicine, Social Sciences

Guido Kroemer Univ Paris Descartes, France Immunology, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology

Among the 4,058 researchers named as Highly Cited in the 21 ESI fields, 194, or 4.8%, appear in two ESI fields and only 24, or .6%, appear in three fields. (Cross-Field researchers qualify in only one category, or else they would have been chosen in one or more ESI fields.)

The table below lists the 24 Highly Cited Researchers named in three ESI fields. They are a group remarkable in both output and impact. The high level of performance of these two dozen warrants special recognition as citation superstars.

Table continued

Institutions* Country /region

Number HCRs

Institutions Nation Number HCRs

Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore 40 VU Univ Amsterdam Netherlands 26

Natl Inst Allergy Infectious Dis (NIAID) United States 39 Tsing Hua Univ China Mainland 26

Columbia Univ United States 39 Mem Sloan Kettering Cancer Ctr United States 26

Brigham & Women’s Hospital United States 38 Caltech United States 25

Univ Michigan United States 37 Univ Maryland United States 25


Name Primary Affiliation Fields

Robert S. Langer MIT, United States Biology & Biochemistry, Materials Sciences, Pharmacology

Gang Li Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Zhuang Liu Suzhou Univ, China Mainland Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin

Swiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne, Switzerland Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Markus Reichstein Max Planck Soc, Germany Agricultural Sciences, Environment/Ecology, Geosciences

Rodney S. Ruoff Ulsan Natl Inst Sci Technol, South Korea Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Henry J. Snaith Univ Oxford, United Kingdom Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Zhong Lin Wang Georgia Inst Technol, United States Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Walter C. Willett Harvard Univ, United States Agricultural Sciences, Clinical Medicine, Social Sciences

Richard K. Wilson Washington Univ St Louis, United States Biology & Biochemistry, Clinical Medicine, Molecular Biology

Younan Xia Georgia Inst Technol, United States Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Peidong Yang Univ Calif Berkeley, United States Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Yang Yang Univ Calif Los Angeles, United States Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics

Jiaguo Yu Wuhan Univ Technol, China Mainland Chemistry, Engineering, Materials Science

Table continued

It is important to understand the difference between selection as a Highly Cited Researcher in the Cross-Field category and selection in more than one ESI field. Both classes of individuals have demonstrated significant research impact across fields. Cross-Field researchers, however, qualify for selection based on the sum of their highly cited papers and citations that meets a normalized threshold equivalent to selection in any one field whereas those named in multiple fields qualify outright in each field.

The foregoing is but a ‘tasting’ of the riches of Highly Cited Researcher data from Clarivate Analytics. In early 2019, we will publish a more detailed analysis of the 2018 data, with attention paid to national and regional activity and performance.

Researchers are selected for their exceptional performance in one or more of 21 fields or across several fields.


References

1. Eugene Garfield, “Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas,” Science, 122 (3159): 108-111, July 15, 1955

2. Robert K. Merton, “The Matthew Effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property,” Isis, 79 (4): 606-623, December 1988

3. John N. Parker, Christopher Lortie, Stefano Allesina, “Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology,” Scientometrics, 85 (1): 129-143, October 2010

4. Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, and Ismael Rafols, “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics,” Nature, 520 (7548), 429–431, April 23, 2015

5. Eugene Garfield and Alfred Welljams-Dorof, “Of Nobel class: a citation perspective on high impact research authors,” Theoretical Medicine, 13 (2): 17-35, June 1992

6. Eun-Jung Park, “Defying the odds – my journey to becoming a Highly Cited Researcher” www.healtheuropa.eu/becoming-highly-cited-researcher/84800/ (Also see: Chris King, “For Eun-Jung Park, a long road to ‘Highly Cited Researcher’,” Science Research Connect, December 6, 2017 https://clarivate.com/blog/science-research-connect/ eun-jung-park-long-road-highly-cited-researcher/

7. Ahmed H. Zewail, “Curiouser and curiouser: Managing discovery making,” Nature, 468 (7322): 347, November 2010

http://www.healtheuropa.eu/becoming-highly-cited-researcher/84800/

https://clarivate.com/blog/science-research-connect/eun-jung-park-long-road-highly-cited-researcher/

https://clarivate.com/blog/science-research-connect/eun-jung-park-long-road-highly-cited-researcher/


About Web of Science

Web of Science is the world’s most trusted and largest publisher-neutral citation index, powering global discovery and citation analytics across the sciences, social sciences and art & humanities.

With over 1.4 billion cited references going back to 1900 and millions of users per day – from leading government and academic institutions and research-intensive corporations – Web of Science citation network serves as the foundation for the Journal Impact Factor, InCites and other powerful and trusted citation-impact measures. The Web of Science helps researchers, research institutions, publishers and funders discoverand assess the citation impact of over a century of research publications found in the most prestigious journals, books, and conference proceedings.

To learn more about Web of Science, visit: clarivate.com/web-of-science

About Clarivate Analytics

Clarivate Analytics is the global leader in providing trusted insights and analytics

to accelerate the pace of innovation. Building on a heritage going back more than acentury and a half, we have built

some of the most trusted brands across the innovation lifecycle, including Web of

Science, Cortellis, Derwent, CompuMark, MarkMonitor and Techstreet. Today, Clarivate

Analytics is a new and independent company on a bold entrepreneurial mission to help our clients radically reduce the time from

new ideas to life-changing innovations.

For more information, please visit clarivate.com

About Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)

ISI is the ‘university’ of the Web of Science Group at Clarivate Analytics: it maintains the knowledge corpus upon which Web of Science and related information and analytical content, products and services are built; it disseminates that knowledge internally through reports and recommendations and externally through events, conferences and publications; and it carries out research to sustain, extend and improve the knowledge base.

To see the full list of Highly Cited Researchers 2018, go to hcr.clarivate.com

http://clarivate.com/web-of-science

http://clarivate.com


https://hcr.clarivate.com/#categories%3Dmaterials-science 1/23




Search name and a�iliation

Filter categories

Clear all



Chemistry

Clinical Medicine

Computer Science


Engineering

Environment/Ecology

Geosciences

Immunology

Materials Science

Mathematics

Ade Harald

Materials ScienceN Carolina State UnivUnited States

Ajayan Pulickel M.

Materials ScienceRice UnivUnited States

Amine Khalil

Materials Science


http://discover.clarivate.com/hcr-2018-exec-summary





Microbiology




Physics




Space Science

Cross-Field

Materials ScienceArgonne Natl LabUnited StatesStanford Univ, United States; Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Univ, Saudi Arabia

Antonietti Markus

Materials ScienceMax Planck SocGermany

Archer Lynden A.

Materials ScienceCornell UnivUnited States

Ariga Katsuhiko

Materials ScienceNIMSJapanUniv Tokyo, Japan

Asiri Abdullah M.

Materials ScienceKing Abdulaziz UnivSaudi Arabia






http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7905-3209




Bando Yoshio

Materials ScienceUniv WollongongAustraliaTianjin Univ, China Mainland

Bao Zhenan

Materials ScienceStanford UnivUnited States

Bazan Guillermo C.

Materials ScienceUniv Calif Santa BarbaraUnited States

Blom Paul W. M.


Boccaccini Aldo R.

Materials ScienceUniv Erlangen Nuremberg



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6543-5529

https://isem.uow.edu.au/staff/UOW245030.html



http://www.researcherid.com/rid/U-8304-2017




Univ Erlangen NurembergGermany

Brabec Christoph J.

Materials ScienceZAE BayernGermanyUniv Erlangen Nuremberg, Germany

Brongersma Mark L.


Bruce Peter G.

Materials ScienceUniv OxfordUnited Kingdom

Cao Anyuan

Materials SciencePeking UnivChina Mainland





http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-0253

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/R-6099-2016

http://pgbgroup.materials.ox.ac.uk/people/bruce.html





Cao Guozhong

Materials ScienceUniv WashingtonUnited States

Cao Mao-Sheng

Materials ScienceBeijing Inst TechnolChina Mainland

Cao Yong

Materials ScienceS China Univ TechnolChina Mainland

Chen Gang


Chen Jun

Materials ScienceNankai UnivChina Mainland



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-9422


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3968-8530




China Mainland

Chen Junhong

Materials ScienceUniv Wisconsin SystemUnited States

Chen Liquan

Materials ScienceChinese Acad SciChina Mainland

Chen Mingwei

Materials ScienceJohns Hopkins UnivUnited StatesTohoku Univ, Japan

Chen Xiaodong

Materials ScienceNanyang Technol UnivSingapore

Chen Xiaoyuan

Materials Science





http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-8872

https://engineering.jhu.edu/materials/faculty/



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-1664




Materials ScienceNatl Inst Hlth USAUnited States

Chen Yongsheng

Materials ScienceNankai UnivChina Mainland

Cheng Hui-Ming

Materials ScienceChinese Acad SciChina MainlandKing Abdulaziz Univ, Saudi Arabia

Cheng Liang

Materials ScienceSuzhou UnivChina Mainland

Chhowalla Manish

Materials ScienceRutgers State UnivUnited States


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9622-0870


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-8177

http://nanocenter.nankai.edu.cn/profyongshengchen.htm


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-4241





Cho Jaephil

Materials ScienceUlsan Natl Inst Sci TechnolSouth Korea

Chowdari B. V. R.


Chu Paul K.

Materials ScienceCity Univ Hong KongHong Kong

Chu Y. H.

Materials ScienceNatl Chiao Tung UnivTaiwan

Chueh Chu-Chen

Materials ScienceUniv Washington





http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5581-4883

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3435-9084




United States

Coleman Jonathan N.

Materials ScienceTrinity Coll DublinIreland

Cui Yi


Dai Hongjie


Dai Liming

Materials ScienceUNSW SydneyAustraliaCase Western Reserve Univ, United States; Beijing Univ Chem Technol, ChinaMainland

Dai Sheng




http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9659-9721


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-6352





Dai Sheng

Materials ScienceOak Ridge Natl LabUnited StatesUniv Tennessee, United States

Dou Shi-Xue

Materials ScienceUniv WollongongAustralia

Duan Xiangfeng

Materials ScienceUniv Calif Los AngelesUnited States

Facchetti Antonio

Materials ScienceFlexterraUnited StatesNorthwestern Univ, United States

Fan Hong Jin

Materials ScienceNanyang Technol Univ



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8046-3931



http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3824-7693

http://xduan.chem.ucla.edu/


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-7958




y gSingapore

Fan Zhuangjun

Materials ScienceHarbin Engn UnivChina Mainland

Fang Xiaosheng

Materials ScienceFudan UnivChina Mainland

Feng Xinliang

Materials ScienceTech Univ DresdenGermanyShanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Mainland

Ferrari Andrea C.

Materials ScienceUniv CambridgeUnited Kingdom

Frechet Jean M. J.




http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-4555






Materials ScienceKing Abdullah Univ Sci & TechnolSaudi ArabiaUniv Calif Berkeley, United States

Geim Andre K.

Materials ScienceUniv ManchesterUnited Kingdom

Gogotsi Yury

Materials ScienceDrexel UnivUnited StatesJilin Univ, China Mainland

Golberg Dmitri

Materials ScienceQueensland Univ TechnolAustraliaNIMS, Japan

Graetzel Michael

Materials ScienceSwiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne


http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-0163


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2861-8331



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9423-4032



http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-6539




Swiss Fed Inst Technol LausanneSwitzerlandKing Abdulaziz Univ, Saudi Arabia

Gu Lin


Guo Xia


Guo Yu-Guo


Heeger Alan J.


Heeney Martin




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7504-031X


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0322-8476

http://mnn.iccas.ac.cn/guoyuguo/




Materials ScienceImperial Coll LondonUnited Kingdom

Hone James C.

Materials ScienceColumbia UnivUnited States

Hong Ziruo


Hou Jianhui


Hu Yong-Sheng




http://www.researcherid.com/rid/O-1916-2013

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-5020


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8084-3301


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2763-003X


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2105-6922


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-6474




Huang Fei


Huang Jia-Qi

Materials ScienceBeijing Inst TechnolChina Mainland

Huang Jinsong

Materials ScienceUniv N Carolina Chapel HillUnited StatesUniv Nebraska Lincoln, United States

Huang Wei

Materials ScienceNorthwestern Polytech UnivChina Mainland

Huang Xiao



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-6474




http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-9186

http://arims.bit.edu.cn/xzdw/qnggjs/tbyjy/103298.htm

http://huangjinsong.wixsite.com/group/jinsong-huang


http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7004-6408




g

Materials ScienceNanjing Tech UnivChina Mainland

Huang Yonggang Y.

Materials ScienceNorthwestern UnivUnited States

Huang Yunhui

Materials ScienceHuazhong Univ Sci & TechnolChina Mainland

Hyeon Taeghwan

Materials ScienceSeoul Natl UnivSouth KoreaInst Basic Sci Korea, South Korea

Inganas Olle

Materials ScienceLinkoping UnivSweden




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-7763







Janssen Rene A. J.

Materials ScienceEindhoven Univ TechnolNetherlands

Jaroniec Mietek

Materials ScienceKent State UnivUnited States

Jen Alex K. Y.

Materials ScienceCity Univ Hong KongHong KongUniv Washington, United States

Jenekhe Samson A.

Materials ScienceUniv WashingtonUnited States

Jiang Lei




http://www.researcherid.com/rid/W-2959-2017

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-5124



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1178-5611

https://publons.com/author/1380315/mietek-jaroniec#profile


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-7749

http://www.cityu.edu.hk/chem/profile/pakyj.html





Kanatzidis Mercouri G.


Kaskel Stefan

Materials ScienceTech Univ DresdenGermany

Khademhosseini Ali


Kido Junji

Materials ScienceYamagata UnivJapan



http://chemgroups.northwestern.edu/kanatzidis/



http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4572-0303


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2692-1524

https://www.bioeng.ucla.edu/ali-khademhosseini-ph-d/





Kim Dae-Hyeong

Materials ScienceSeoul Natl UnivSouth KoreaInst Basic Sci Korea, South Korea

Kim Jang-Kyo

Materials ScienceHong Kong Univ Sci & TechnolHong Kong

Kim Jin Young

Materials ScienceUlsan Natl Inst Sci TechnolSouth Korea

Krebs Frederik C.

Materials ScienceTech Univ DenmarkDenmark

Langer Robert S.



https://scholar.google.co.kr/citations?user=wBOc_CMAAAAJ&hl=ko&oi=ao



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5390-8763



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-4468

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-4314




g


Lee Jim Yang

Materials ScienceNatl Univ SingaporeSingapore

Li Chunxia

Materials ScienceZhejiang Normal UnivChina Mainland

Li Feng


Li Gang

Materials ScienceHong Kong Polytech UnivHong Kong



http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1569-9718


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-9914



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-7771




Li Hong


Li Jinghong

Materials ScienceTsing Hua UnivChina Mainland

Li Ju


Li Yongfang

Materials ScienceChinese Acad SciChina MainlandSuzhou Univ, China Mainland

Lieber Charles M.

Materials ScienceHarvard Univ




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8659-086X


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0750-7352

http://rid.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/scholar/653517


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-8058

http://li.mit.edu/

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/I-6011-2013

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2565-2748




United States

Lin Jun

Materials ScienceKing Saud UnivSaudi ArabiaChinese Acad Sci, China Mainland

Lin Yuehe

Materials ScienceWashington State UnivUnited StatesPacific NW Natl Lab, United States

Liu Hong

Materials ScienceShandong UnivChina Mainland

Liu Hua-Kun






http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3791-7587

https://mme.wsu.edu/yuehe-lin/



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0253-647X




Liu Jun

Materials SciencePacific NW Natl LabUnited States

Liu Yunqi


1 2 3


© 2018 HCR

Follow us

Copyright notice

Terms of use

Privacy statement

Cookie policy















Filter categories

Clear all



Chemistry

Clinical Medicine

Computer Science


Engineering

Environment/Ecology

Geosciences

Immunology

Materials Science

Mathematics

Liu Zheng


Liu Zhuang


Liz-Marzan Luis M




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-7198


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1629-1039




Microbiology




Physics




Space Science

Cross-Field

Liz Marzan Luis M.

Materials ScienceCIC biomaGUNESpainBasque Fdn Sci, Spain

Lou Xiong Wen (David)


Lu Gao Qing (Max)

Materials ScienceUniv SurreyUnited Kingdom

Lu Xihong

Materials ScienceSun Yat Sen UnivChina Mainland

Ma E.

Materials ScienceJohns Hopkins UnivUnited States



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-1353



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-1674

https://www.mendeley.com/profiles/gao-qing-max-lu/



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-0024

http://ce.sysu.edu.cn/html/TeachersTeam/7883.html




Maier Joachim


Manthiram Arumugam

Materials ScienceUniv Texas AustinUnited States

Marks Tobin J.


McCulloch Iain

Materials ScienceKing Abdullah Univ Sci & TechnolSaudi ArabiaImperial Coll London, United Kingdom

McGehee Michael D.




http://sites.utexas.edu/manthiram/




United States

Mhaisalkar Subodh G.


Mitzi David B.

Materials ScienceDuke UnivUnited States

Muellen Klaus


Nazar Linda F.

Materials ScienceUniv WaterlooCanada

Nazeeruddin Mohammad Khaja




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9895-2426


http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5189-4612

https://mems.duke.edu/faculty/david-mitzi



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-8197

https://uwaterloo.ca/chemistry/people-profiles/linda-nazar




Materials ScienceSwiss Fed Inst Technol LausanneSwitzerlandKing Abdulaziz Univ, Saudi Arabia

Nelson Jenny

Materials ScienceImperial Coll LondonUnited Kingdom

Nguyen Thuc-Quyen


Nie Zimin


Novoselov Kostya S.

Materials ScienceUniv ManchesterUnited Kingdom



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5955-4786

https://people.epfl.ch/mdkhaja.nazeeruddin

http://www.chem.ucsb.edu/nguyengroup/thuc-quyen-nguyen


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-5371




Park Nam-Gyu

Materials ScienceSungkyunkwan UnivSouth Korea

Passerini Stefano

Materials ScienceKarlsruhe Inst TechnolGermanySapienza Univ Rome, Italy

Qiao Shi Zhang

Materials ScienceUniv AdelaideAustralia

Qu Xiaogang


Raabe D.

Materials ScienceMax Planck Soc




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-5304



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-8422






Max Planck SocGermany

Ramakrishna Seeram

Materials ScienceNatl Univ SingaporeSingapore

Ramesh Ramamoorthy

Materials ScienceUniv Calif BerkeleyUnited States

Ren Wencai


Rogers John A.

Materials ScienceNorthwestern UnivUnited StatesUniv Illinois System, United States




http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-6124


https://blog.nus.edu.sg/seeram/

https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/ramamoorthy-ramesh





Ruo� Rodney S.

Materials ScienceUlsan Natl Inst Sci TechnolSouth KoreaInst Basic Sci Korea, South Korea

Russell Thomas P.

Materials ScienceUniv Mass SystemUnited States

Salleo Alberto


Sargent Edward H.

Materials ScienceUniv TorontoCanada

Schubert Ulrich S.

Materials ScienceFriedrich Schiller Univ JenaGermanyMax Planck Soc, Germany



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-6764



http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-4670




Scrosati Bruno

Materials ScienceSapienza Univ RomeItaly

Shao Yuyan


Shao Zongping

Materials ScienceCurtin UnivAustralia

Shen Laifa


Shi Gaoquan

Materials ScienceTsing Hua Univ


http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7382-1465

http://dicma.ing.uniroma1.it/english/people


http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5735-2670



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-6446




Tsing Hua UnivChina Mainland

Shi Jianlin


Simon Patrice

Materials ScienceUniv Paul Sabatier - Toulouse IIIFrance

Snaith Henry J.

Materials ScienceUniv OxfordUnited Kingdom

Snyder G. Je�rey


Sun Xueliang

Materials Science



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-8268


http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8511-790X


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1414-8682




Materials ScienceTianjin Normal UnivChina Mainland

Sun Xuping

Materials ScienceUniv Elect Sci & Technol ChinaChina MainlandKing Abdulaziz Univ, Saudi Arabia

Sun Yang-Kook

Materials ScienceHanyang UnivSouth Korea

Taberna Pierre-Louis

Materials ScienceUniv Paul Sabatier - Toulouse IIIFrance

Tang Ben Zhong

Materials ScienceS China Univ TechnolChina MainlandHong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong





http://www.researcherid.com/rid/T-7163-2018

http://faculty.uestc.edu.cn/sunxuping/en/index.htm



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0117-0170


http://www.aiepolymer.com/




Tang Zhiyong

Materials ScienceNatl Ctr Nanosci Technol China (CAS)China Mainland

Taniguchi Takashi

Materials ScienceNIMSJapan

Tarascon Jean-Marie

Materials ScienceColl FranceFrance

Thomas Arne

Materials ScienceTech Univ BerlinGermany

Toney Michael F.

Materials Science



http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0610-0064

http://sourcedb.nanoctr.cas.cn//zw/zxrck/200906/t20090602_252684.html




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2130-4930




Stanford UnivUnited States

Tong Yexiang

Materials ScienceSun Yat Sen UnivChina Mainland

Tu J. P.

Materials ScienceZhejiang UnivChina Mainland

Vajtai Robert

Materials ScienceRice UnivUnited States

Wan Li-Jun


Wang Chao

Materials ScienceS h U i



http://www.researcherid.com/rid/R-7839-2016

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0656-0936




Suzhou UnivChina Mainland

Wang Chongmin


Wang Guoxiu

Materials ScienceUniv Technol SydneyAustralia

Wang Jia-Zhao


Wang X. L.


Wang Xinchen

M t i l S i




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8054-3472


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-8578

https://www.uts.edu.au/staff/guoxiu.wang





Materials ScienceKing Abdulaziz UnivSaudi ArabiaFuzhou Univ, China Mainland

Wang Yonggang


Wang Zhong Lin

Materials ScienceGeorgia Inst TechnolUnited States

Waser Rainer

Materials ScienceJulich Res CtrGermany

Watanabe Kenji




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2490-3568


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-4679


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-0380


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-8980


http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-8119




Wei Fei


Wei Tong


Wei Yen


Wen Zhenhai

Materials ScienceFujian Inst Res Struct Matter (CAS)China Mainland

Wienk Martijn M.

Materials ScienceEindhoven Univ Technol



http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-8119

http://www.researcherid.com/rid/H-4809-2012;H-4674-2012



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0397-4156

http://www.fjirsm.ac.cn/wenergy/wenergy_wen/




Eindhoven Univ TechnolNetherlands

Wong Wai-Yeung

Materials ScienceHong Kong Polytech UnivHong KongHong Kong Baptist Univ, Hong Kong

Wu Hao Bin


Wu Hongbin


Xia Yongyao


Xia Younan

Materials Science


http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9949-7525



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0725-6442




Georgia Inst TechnolUnited States

Xiao Jie

Materials SciencePacific NW Natl LabUnited StatesUniv Arkansas System, United States

Xu Qiang

Materials ScienceNatl Inst Adv Ind Sci Technol - JapanJapanYangzhou Univ, China Mainland; Kobe Univ, Japan; Kyoto Univ, Japan; HongKong Polytechnic Univ, Hong Kong

Yan Jun


Yan Qingyu





http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5520-5439



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-9650



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-3912




Yang Kai


Yang Peidong

Materials ScienceUniv Calif BerkeleyUnited States

Yang Shubin

Materials ScienceBeihang UnivChina Mainland

Yang Xiao-Qing

Materials ScienceBrookhaven Natl LabUnited States

Yang Yang

Materials Science




http://www.researcherid.com/rid/T-7686-2017

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-1024



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-9785





Ye Jinhua


Yin Zongyou

Materials ScienceAustralian Natl UnivAustralia

Yip Hin-Lap


You Jingbi





http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8105-8903



http://chemistry.anu.edu.au/people/zongyou-yin



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4651-9081




Yu Jiaguo

Materials ScienceWuhan Univ TechnolChina MainlandKing Abdulaziz Univ, Saudi Arabia

Yu Shu-Hong

Materials ScienceUniv Sci & Technol ChinaChina Mainland

Yu Ting


Yuan Changzhou

Materials ScienceUniv JinanChina Mainland

Yuan Yongbo




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0612-8633



http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-1011

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0113-2895



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6484-8970

http://yzadm.ujn.edu.cn/Page/Dsxxb18/bsds_data/bsds_id/87775694-2f39-8ef4-041a-b4c926a1e883/status/1.html




Materials ScienceUniv Nebraska SystemUnited States

Yushin Gleb

Materials ScienceGeorgia Inst TechnolUnited States

Zakeeruddin Shaik M.

Materials ScienceSwiss Fed Inst Technol LausanneSwitzerlandKing Abdulaziz Univ, Saudi Arabia

Zeng Haibo

Materials ScienceNanjing Univ Sci & TechnolChina Mainland

Zhang Hua




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3274-9265



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0281-3617



http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-740X




1 ... 2 3


© 2018 HCR

Follow us

Copyright notice

Terms of use

Privacy statement

Cookie policy















Filter categories

Clear all



Chemistry

Clinical Medicine

Computer Science


Engineering

Environment/Ecology

Geosciences

Immunology

Materials Science

Mathematics

Zhang Ji-Guang


Zhang Qiang


Zhang Shaoqing




http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7343-4609



http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-1541




Microbiology




Physics




Space Science

Cross-Field

Zhang Shaoqing

Materials ScienceUniv Sci & Technol BeijingChina Mainland

Zhang Xiaogang

Materials ScienceNanjing Univ Aeronaut & AstronautChina Mainland

Zhao Dongyuan

Materials ScienceFudan UnivChina MainlandMonash Univ, Australia

Zhi Linjie


Zhou Guangmin






http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1642-2510





Zhou Haoshen

Materials ScienceNanjing UnivChina Mainland

1 ... 2 3


© 2018 HCR

Follow us

Copyright notice

Terms of use

Privacy statement

Cookie policy




http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-5686

https://profiles.stanford.edu/guangmin-zhou








Documents

View on Mobile or Online - Nanonano.xjtu.edu.cn/__local/B/32/76/84115F3EC603DF0C0DC284...View the list Subject: Congratulaons, Highly Cited Researcher! From: Clarivate Analycs