UZBEKISTAN 2010 AFC Futsal Championship UZBEKISTAN …res.cloudinary.com/deltatreafcprod/image/upload/zamtmhcnv622qujavsmt.pdf1 AFC Futsal Championship UZBEKISTAN 2010 23-30 MAY 2010

AFC FUTSAL CHAMPIONSHIP 2010

1

AFC Futsal ChampionshipUZBEKISTAN 201023-30 MAY 2010

Technical Report and Statistics

UZBEKISTAN 2010

2

UZBEKISTAN 2010


3

GENERAL

Foreword by the AFC President 3

OVERALL ANALYSISGeneral Organization 6

Technical and Tactical Analysis 8

Story of the Championship 10

Regional Analysis 12

STATISTIC AND TEAM DATAVenues and Stadiums 16

Results and Ranking 18

Match Data 24

Official AFC Awards 34

General Statistics 38

Referee and Assistant Referees 52

Preliminary Competitions 54

Team Data and Analysis 56

AFC Delegation 88

TSG Members and Assistants 90

Contents

2

UZBEKISTAN 2010


3

Mohamed Bin HammamPresident

AFC President’s Message

Dear friends,

The AFC Futsal Championship may be just eleven years old but it is already one of our most endearing and established competitions. The popularity of this event is directly linked to the overall attraction and rapid growth of Futsal in Asia where the mini-version of football has found favour with the masses.

It is very heartwarming to see our Futsal developmental efforts achieve a year on year increase in spectator attendance and media coverage of the AFC Futsal Championship. I have also observed tremendous improvements in speed, tactics, skills, and strategies which mean we are on the right track of development.

AFC is determined to move forward in full speed in its mission to bring up the level of coaches, players and clubs from amateur to professional. This ambition, of course, needs the close collaboration of our member associations as this will bring us to the standard that can be compared to the worlds’ best in Futsal.

This year in Uzbekistan, we saw the best 16 teams from Asia in action in Tashkent. Determined to defend their title, Iran exhibited exemplary performance to reach the finals of the competition. On the other hand, Uzbekistan was also full of determination to achieve victory in the competition and worthily reached the finals as well.

We are very grateful to the Uzbekistan Football Federation for their support and dedication in hosting the eleventh edition of the AFC Futsal Championship.

Lastly, on behalf of the AFC Executive Committee, I would like to congratulate the Football Association of Thailand for becoming the third Asian country to be given the honor by FIFA to host the FIFA Futsal World Cup 2012.

4

UZBEKISTAN 2010


5

• General Organization

• Technical and Tactical Analysis

• Story of the Championship

• Regional Analysis

OVERALL ANALYSIS

6

UZBEKISTAN 2010


7

The attractiveness of the five-a-side version of the game has in the last decade experienced exponential growth in Asia. Its popularity can be attributed to its easy accessibility to all

and the lightning pace of the game on a reduced pitch.

The AFC Futsal Championship presents to Asian fans and spectators an opportunity to enjoy the highest level of elite Futsal games.

AFC organizes this annual Asian competition, which enables the teams to develop their competitive instincts.

The AFC Futsal Championship 2010 was held from 23 to 30 May in the beautiful country of Uzbekistan. Passionate spectators eagerly watched the championship, the skillful players of Uzbekistan, and the crowned champions again, IR Iran.

The Organizing Committee of Uzbekistan worked diligently hard to make necessary improvements to meet the requirements of organizing the Futsal championship.

The venues of the competition were the Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Tashkent and the IT University Complex, Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan. One of the stadiums were extremely well-equipped to accommodate Asia’s best Futsal teams and their supporters.

The Uzbekistan Sports Complex served as the main court of the competition where all the televised matches took place. The offices of the AFC delegation and the Organizing committee were also conveniently located in the stadium. It also provided ample space for the media and VIP. On non-match days, it becomes the venue for the training of the teams

The IT University Complex, which served as the second venue,

GENERAL ORGANIZATION

but was not as good as the main venue. The surfaces of the two Futsal courts were constructed especially for the tournament. The Uzbekistan Football Association and AFC collaborated to ensure that the championship was televised to increase its fan base.

Transportation, security, medical facilities and the friendliness shown towards foreigners did not fail to leave a good impression on all those fortunate enough to have made it to Uzbekistan.

The matches from the group stage to the finals were varied but full of excitement. The Knock-out match between Uzbekistan and China P.R. was deferent than the past game Uzbek crowds give their team the power to beat china . Uzbekistan, however, bowed to the defending champions, IR Iran.

In spite of the aggressiveness of the teams to win, the sporting level of fair play shown by the teams charmed the championship.The AFC Futsal Championship 2010 took another step forward in the development of the game with the publication of this Technical Report. This will encourage more development work by the Member Associations through the feedback given to improve their teams and the education of coaches.

In conclusion, the organization of the AFC Futsal Championship 2010 was a success for it has fulfilled the needs of all the stakeholders of the championship. The analysis of all the events in Uzbekistan will be a benchmark to help improve preparations of future tournaments. The game of Futsal being new necessitates extending competitions and leagues to develop specialized Futsal coaches and referees.

We look forward to more pleasant surprises in the future.

8

UZBEKISTAN 2010


9

TECHNICAL AND TACTICAL ANALYSIS

Uzbekistan organized the 11th AFC Futsal Championship 2010 for the top teams who qualified. The competition was well organized but it also shows that it is still in the

developmental stage in Asia. More study and work needs to be done by the Member Associations to boost the knowledge of Futsal and to develop the competition.

AFC appointed a Technical Study Group for the competition. They evaluated teams’ tactics and the technical ability of players. The report will help the development of Futsal in the Member Associations by making recommendations to Futsal instructors who will deliver Futsal Coaching Courses as well as for Futsal coaches.

I.R Iran, Uzbekistan, Japan and China qualified for the 2012 FIFA World Championship

Iran beat bitter rivals Japan, 7-0 in the semifinal match . In the other semifinal match, Uzbekistan defeated China, 4-3.

The reigning champion Iran dominated Uzbekistan in all aspects

of the game during the final match to win the match, 8-3.. The win is Iran’s tenth title out of 11 competitions.

Japan defeated China P.R. 6-1 in a very slow and boring match to clinch 3rd place.

It was once again obvious that countries without regular Futsal competition have found it much harder to develop the game during the competition.

A big variation in method between the coaches was obvious regarding their discipline and strategic preparation in this tournament.

Some coaches made one substitution at a time, which allowed the players to get more involved in the match and also to quickly change the strategy of the team. Some coaches did not intervene at all, with themselves making the substitutions.

Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that the most successful teams had coaches who took a practical approach.

Most of the teams used a mass substitution system, four players being substituted at the same time, in this tournament as compared to last year.

In general, exceptional teams used 3-1 and rarely 4-0 formations and switching at times to 1-3, 2-2 formations to score. The other teams need more work on the training ground to adapt quickly and efficiently to different playing systems.

Fitness is one of the requirements of using pressurizing tactic. Three out of the four top teams in this competition were using pressing defense in the opponents half and that showed the teams had good Futsal physical preparation for this important competition to qualify for the FIFA Word Cup .

Player’s solo effort and counter attacking was the base of most of the teams’ attacking strategies in this tournament as noticed in the statistics and graphs.

An excellent counter attack is a sign of the team’s defensive achievement. This means that the teams play defensive as a

strategy but after regaining the ball, immediately go for attack to score using varied counter attack tactics in Futsal. Some teams used man to man defending without a coordinated change in the system which resulted into confusion when the opponents employ rotation system.

The best teams used a mix defending system which is a combination of zonal and man marking systems with coordinated changes in the system depending on the situation. This is more dynamic than zonal system.

Goalkeeper’s performances improved a lot as well. The goalkeepers were confident with their field player’s skills while receiving and making passes as well as shot stopping skills. Some teams used their goalkeepers as power play players and some teams play back pass to the goalkeeper from the opponent’s half to deter opponent’s pressure and to keep ball possession just like Tajikistan goalkeeper.

This is probably the reason of the increased importance of goalkeepers training with special goalkeeper coaches.

10

UZBEKISTAN 2010


11

STORY OF THE CHAMPIONSHIP

Group A:

The host country of this championship, Uzbekistan, was top of this group with 3 wins in a row. They played differently from their previous competitions after the former Futsal National Head Coach of Japan Mr. Sapo became their head coach. They were more aggressive in attack, better organized in defense and played more as a team thus making them one of the most exciting teams in this tournament.

Indonesia also performed better than before as they played more as a unit. Their players showed good individual ability.

Lebanon’s major attribute were their strong and fit physicality. Some of their players were skillful and if they could consistently work well as a unit, they will be a team to be reckoned with in future.

Although Chinese Taipei did not get any points in this group, their fighting spirit was an inspiration to others in the tournament.

Group B:

The fact that I.R. Iran became the top of this group with 9 points was no surprise at all. They had versatile individuals and worked well as a unit in terms of attack and defend throughout the tournament. They were physical superiority was another factor why they could dominate most of the matches.

Australia showed they have the potential to develop this game in their country. Most of their players were rather young but showed good discipline. They played solidly in defense and launched quick counter-attacks efficiently most of the time.

Tajikistan was good in attack but not when defending. They conceded 27 goals in the group stage. Even though losing 19:2 to I.R. Iran in one of the group matches, they showed that they have the ability to score goals against the best team in Asia.

There were some talented players in the Kuwait team but unfortunately, they did not play as a unit in most of the matches.

Group C:

Thailand is one of the power house of Asia which comprised mostly of young players. This competition was a good platform for their Head coach to cultivate the young ones by giving them the opportunity to gain more international experience and maturity in preparation for the next championship which will be hosted by Thailand. They performed quite well in this group in terms of attack but in defense, they were not truly tested.

Besides Thailand, Kyrgyzstan, Vietnam and Korea Republic were very close competitors vying for another qualifying seat among themselves.

Vietnam showed marked improvements after engaging an Italian coach to guide them while Korea Republic still used a young team to for this competition. The Koreans had very good fighting spirit and their players were quite skillful. However, they will have to train and play more games in order for their players to gain more experience.

Group D:

Japan won all three group matches and qualified to the 2nd round. They outclassed China P.R. and Iraq and showed they were one of the best team in this tournament. They defeated China and Iraq 5:1 and 10:1 respectively and demonstrated that they had good scoring abilities and also at the same time, they were good at defending. However, in the match against Turkmenistan, Japan was struggling in their play against this team which executed Power Play right from the beginning but they still managed to finished 1:0.

China P.R. consisted of a group of young and skillful players that performed reasonably well both in attack and defense. Under their Brazilian coach, we noticed that this team has improved.Iraq won only one match in this group against Turkmenistan but they played a very close match with China. They showed their strong mentality throughout the tournament.

THAILAND VS CHINA P.R. (1st Q/Finals)

China started the match with confidence and determination. They pushed forward and pressed the Thailand players until they could not play their usual game. There were plenty of missed passes when they tried to build up. It was evident that Thailand was in a bit of a panic.China’s players performed well individually as well as a team. They won most of the 1 v 1 duel and showed that they were fit enough to play man to man marking right from the beginning. As a result, Thailand was not able to keep ball possession well and lost their shape.

Plenty of attractive and attacking combination play from China also helped them dominate throughout the match.

When Thailand occupied the Power Play from the second half, China showed that they were prepared for this and reacted to it very well. The match ended up 9:2 to China.

JAPAN VS KYRGYSTAN (2nd QF Match)

Japan started the game with determination and tried to score very quickly, so they pressed from the beginning and attacked from the wings as was their style coupled with fast movements from all players to create more space. They did score in the first half Kyrgystan played too cautiously and that only gave Japan more chances to score against them.

UZBEKISTAN VS AUSTRALIA (3rd Q/F Match)

Uzbekistan played aggressively. They pressed from the very first second till the end making sure that Australia could not build up from the back. Their players challenged every 1 v 1 situation physically and demonstrated that they had better physical

abilities. It was evident that the Australian players were a bit tired in the later part of the second half which may be due to the fact that most of their players could not recover after the group matches.

Uzbekistan kept moving and shifting around during attack. Their multitude of variations created plenty of shooting chances while the Australians were struggling to cope with their pace. If Uzbekistan can improve upon their scoring ability, they can become a team to be reckoned with. However, the “never give up” mentality and attitude of the Australian team deserves respect.

I.R. IRAN VS LEBANON (4th Q/F Match)

I.R. Iran seemed to take this game lightly at first and Lebanon took advantage of that and started attacking and threatening I.R. Iran’s goal.

They regrouped and began building attacks from behind and towards the wings till they scored the first goal which geared up their game and played to their true potential with speed and different tactics, and their movements off the ball were smooth and effective. They won 7-1 with ease.

UZBEKISTAN VS CHINA P.R. (1st Semi -Finals)

It was a very close game between these two teams. Uzbekistan could not perform up to their usual standards especially in the first half. It could be due to fatigue and stress.

They were not able to create more scoring chances due to the very little variations during their rotation in attack. They tried some long balls up into the “D” for their ‘Pivot” but lacked accuracy which resulted in their losing possession of the ball most of the times.

China showed that they were well prepared for this tournament. They were confident in 1 v 1 situations and demonstrated good combination play ability. Their sudden “Runs” to the back of their opponents’ defense caused plenty of panic.

Although Uzbekistan defeated China by 4:3, the Chinese impressed us tremendously.

I.R.IRAN VS JAPAN (2nd Semi- Finals)

Iran showed they were good individually as well as a team. Their players performed well in both attack and defend. They pushed up and press making it difficult for Japan to build up their normal play.

Japan lost their confidence and even failed to take shots some 10 meters away from the goal which they were usually good at.Iran showed they were a better side as most of their players were good at finishing. This made it difficult for Japan to defend.

Japan tried the Power Play when they were 0-5 down but Iran showed that they were well prepared and overcame that easily.

They scored two more goals to wrap up the match with 7:0 win.

CHINA P. R. VS JAPAN (3rd / 4th PLACING)

China looked a bit nervous and not as confident as compared with the previous match against Thailand. There were stray passes which caused them to lose the rhythm of attack and they had to face quick counter-attacks launched by Japan. Their rotation was not successful because they did not move around much, lacked concentration and alertness during the set pieces too.

Japan showed they were the better side in 1 v 1 duels. They also combined well as a unit during attack and made plenty of good moves with pattern. They demonstrated very good reaction to the pressing play from the Chinese players. It was evident that the Japanese were well prepared for this match against China.

After defeating China 5:1 in their group “D” match, Japan won again by 6:1 and became the 2nd runners up in this Championship.

FINAL

UZBEKISTAN v I. R. IRAN The host country Uzbekistan had the support of their huge home crowd and they appeared confident and of high spirits. They started the match very well and scored two goals in quick succession causing much to the delight of their supporters in the packed stadium who were cheering them on.

They kept rotating during attack and pressed right after losing ball possession. Their positive attitude earned them the lead for the first 1/3 of the first half.

I.R. Iran, the defending champion, was rattled in the first 5 minutes and lost their shape both in attack and defense. Probably due to the hot atmosphere in the stadium, most of the Iranian players could not perform to their usual standards. But as the match progressed, the Iranian showed their real potential. They were not just good individually but they could work very well as a team. Apart from their good skills, they were also superior in physical fitness. They were down by 0:2, but managed to rebound by beating Uzbekistan 8:3, which demonstrated tough mentality. The Iranian team’s good preparation and possession of international experience also played a major role in their victory.

12

UZBEKISTAN 2010


13

REGIONAL ANALYSIS

Futsal in Asia is developing at different levels. In some countries, they work hard to improve the standards of their game by having very competitive and professional leagues.

In doing so, players gained more experience and exposure and would be able to compete in an international arena. Just like I.R. Iran, Thailand and Japan too have their own league. Unfortunately, most of the countries in Asia have yet to have their own league.

South and Central Asia(Iran, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan)

In general, the south and central regions had the most representatives in this competition compared to the other regions.

The performance of the teams with the exception of I.R. Iran and Uzbekistan was below expectations resulting in the other regions’ great progress this year. Kyrgyzstan only qualified up to the quarterfinals whereas Uzbekistan and I.R. Iran made it to the final round. Eventually, I.R. Iran won the championship once more and qualified for the FIFA Futsal World Cup Championship.

West Asia(Kuwait, Iraq, Lebanon)

The West Asian teams’ lack of Futsal league competitions and exposure may have been a major factor in their poor results. The inexperience and the lack of Futsal players may be another reason why they were not up to par with the standards of top Asian Futsal teams. The Lebanon team played well this year and managed to qualify for the quarterfinals.

The good news for West Asia is that some countries such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar have set up Futsal Committees and started a Futsal league.

It is the hope of AFC that the establishment of Futsal Committees and Leagues will filter through to the other countries where a high level of Futsal is being played. The organization of leagues will develop Futsal players, coaches and referees which will eventually assist West Asian Member Associations to be more competitive in future Futsal competitions.

East Asia(Japan, Korea Republic, Chinese Taipei, China PR)

After a year of absence from the championship, Chinese Taipei qualified thanks to a highly disciplined team with good physically conditioned players. However, they still need to learn more about the game and to adapt to the competition’s format. Japan had the leadership of a new coach and they played very well but were outplayed by I.R. Iran in the final throes of the competition.

South East Asia (Asean)(Thailand, Vietnam, Australia, Indonesia)

Futsal is popular in the South-East Asian countries which is one of the reasons why AFC Futsal Championship was hosted in this region. Good physical condition and speed are positive traits of South-East Asian countries which are essential in Futsal. However, it was noted that there was no improvement to this region’s performance this year as none of the countries managed to reach the next round.

Thailand veered from their usual style technically and tactically. Their entire performance from defense to attack did not produce positive results. They managed to reach the quarterfinals but lost to China. Australia comprised of players who were physically strong and they exhibited great improvements when compared with their previous competitions. They have new and young players this year but they still need composure and patience in the game.

Indonesia and Vietnam were the young teams in this group but demonstrated that they have good potential in Futsal which was evident during their last games as they were able to adjust to the demands of high level of play. It is recommended that they should consider more international exposure prior to the competitions.

14

UZBEKISTAN 2010


15

• Venues and Stadiums

• Result and Ranking

• Group Standings

• Semi Final and Final

• Official AFC Awards

• General Statistics

• Referee and Assistant Referees

• Preliminary Competitions

• Team Data and Analysis

• AFC Delegation

• TSG Members and Assistants

STATISTIC AND TEAM DATA

16

UZBEKISTAN 2010


17

VENUES & STADIUMS

Tashkent,Tashkent, which is the capital of Uzbekistan, is one of the ancient cities located along the great Silk Road from China to Europe.

Since Tashkent was a city of rich merchants and craftspeople, they were known to construct big architectural buildings such as caravanserais, mosques and mausoleums.

Many mausoleums are sprinkled all over the city of Tashkent and the surrounding areas.

Uzbekistan Sports Complex

The Uzbekistan Sports Complex is one of the two venues where the 2010 edition of the AFC Futsal Championship took place in Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

This main venue comprises of a complex well equipped with several rooms for Medical, Doping Contral, Media, LOC, and AFC. The surface of the hall was renovated and constructed especially for this tournament and the plastic surface was in accordance with AFC’s specification.

IT University Complex

The second venue for this championship was at IT University Complex in Tashkent. This complex was not as impressive as the main venue but it was also equipped with the necessary Medical, Doping Contral, Media, LOC and AFC albeit on a smaller scale. The surface of the hall was also renovated and constructed especially for this tournament and the plastic surface was in accordance with AFC’s specification.

Teams Training Stadiums

Four training courts were designated for regular training for the 16 participating countries. The training venues were located at Yoshlik, Chilanzar, Qushbegi and Umid.

Team Managers Meeting

The Representatives from all 16 participating countries and all Delegations of the AFC Futsal Championship 2010 were present at the Team Managers Meeting to kickstart this important event.

Yoshlik Chilanzar

Qushbegi Umid

18

UZBEKISTAN 2010


19

RESULT AND RANKING

P W D L F A GD PTS

UZBEKISTAN 3 3 0 0 11 4 7 9

LEBANON 3 2 0 1 11 9 2 6

INDONESIA 3 1 0 2 10 9 1 3

CHINESE TAIPEI 3 0 0 3 6 16 -10 0

P W D L F A GD PTS

JAPAN 3 3 0 0 16 2 14 9

CHINA P.R. 3 2 0 1 14 13 1 6

IRAQ 3 1 0 2 12 20 -8 3

TURKMENISTAN 3 0 0 3 5 12 -7 0

P W D L F A GD PTS

CHINA P.R. 1 1 0 0 9 2 7 3

I.R. IRAN 1 1 0 0 7 1 6 3

JAPAN 1 1 0 0 4 0 4 3

UZBEKISTAN 1 1 0 0 5 3 2 3

AUSTRALIA 1 0 0 1 3 5 -2 0

KYRGYZSTAN 1 0 0 1 0 4 -4 0

LEBANON 1 0 0 1 1 7 -6 0

THAILAND 1 0 0 1 2 9 -7 0

P W D L F A GD PTS

I.R. IRAN 3 3 0 0 35 5 30 9

AUSTRALIA 3 2 0 1 12 15 -3 6

TAJIKISTAN 3 1 0 2 10 27 -17 3

KUWAIT 3 0 0 3 5 15 -10 0

P W D L F A GD PTS

THAILAND 3 3 0 0 19 7 12 9

KYRGYZSTAN 3 1 1 1 10 10 0 4

VIETNAM 3 1 0 2 11 12 -1 3

KOREA REPUBLIC 3 0 1 2 10 21 -11 1

Group A Group D

Quarter FinalsGroup B

Group C

UZ-BEKISTAN LEBANON INDONESIA CHINESE

TAIPEI P W D LGOALS

GD PTS CAU. EXP.F A

UZBEKISTAN 3-1 4-2 4-1 3 3 0 0 11 4 7 9 3 0

LEBANON 1-3 4-2 6-4 3 2 0 1 11 9 2 6 2 1

INDONESIA 2-4 2-4 6-1 3 1 0 2 10 9 1 3 6 0

CHINESE TAIPEI 1-4 4-6 1-6 3 0 0 3 6 16 -10 0 4 0

TOTAL 38 15 1

AVERAGE PER MATCH 6.33 2.5 0.17

JAPAN CHINA P.R. IRAQ TURKMENI-STAN P W D L

GOALSGD PTS CAU. EXP.

F A

JAPAN 5-1 10-1 1-0 3 3 0 0 16 2 14 9 3 0

CHINA P.R. 1-5 7-6 6-2 3 2 0 1 14 13 1 6 4 0

IRAQ 1-10 6-7 5-3 3 1 0 2 12 20 -8 3 3 1

TURKMENISTAN 0-1 2-6 3-5 3 0 0 3 5 12 -7 0 7 1

TOTAL 47 17 2


I.R. IRAN AUSTRALIA TAJIKISTAN KUWAIT P W D LGOALS

GD PTS CAU. EXP.F A

I.R. IRAN 9-3 19-2 7-0 3 3 0 0 35 5 30 9 3 0

AUSTRALIA 3-9 5-4 4-2 3 2 0 1 12 15 -3 6 5 1

TAJIKISTAN 2-19 4-5 4-3 3 1 0 2 10 27 -17 3 3 0

KUWAIT 0-7 2-4 3-4 3 0 0 3 5 15 -10 0 5 0

TOTAL 62 16 1


THAILAND KYR-GYZSTAN VIETNAM KOREA

REPUBLIC P W D LGOALS

GD PTS CAU. EXP.F A

THAILAND 4-2 5-2 10-3 3 3 0 0 19 7 12 9 4 0

KYRGYZSTAN 2-4 4-2 4-4 3 1 1 1 10 10 0 4 4 0

VIETNAM 2-5 2-4 7-3 3 1 0 2 11 12 -1 3 8 1

KOREA REPUBLIC 3-10 4-4 3-7 3 0 1 2 10 21 -11 1 3 0

TOTAL 50 19 1


CHINA P.R.

I.R. IRAN JAPAN UZ-

BEKISTANAUS-

TRALIAKYR-

GYZSTANLEBA-NON

THAI-LAND P W D L


F A

CHINA P.R. 9-2 1 1 0 0 9 2 7 3 3 0

I.R. IRAN 7-1 1 1 0 0 7 1 6 3 0 0

JAPAN 4-0 1 1 0 0 4 0 4 3 1 0

UZBEKISTAN 5-3 1 1 0 0 5 3 2 3 0 0

AUSTRALIA 3-5 1 0 0 1 3 5 -2 0 0 0

KYRGYZSTAN 0-4 1 0 0 1 0 4 -4 0 1 0

LEBANON 1-7 1 0 0 1 1 7 -6 0 1 0

THAILAND 2-9 1 0 0 1 2 9 -7 0 1 1

TOTAL 31 7 1


20

UZBEKISTAN 2010


21

RESULT AND RANKING

P W D L F A GD PTS

I.R. IRAN 1 1 0 0 7 0 7 3

UZBEKISTAN 1 1 0 0 4 3 1 3

CHINA P.R. 1 0 0 1 3 4 -1 0

JAPAN 1 0 0 1 0 7 -7 0

P W D L F A GD PTS

JAPAN 1 1 0 0 6 1 5 3

CHINA P.R. 1 0 0 1 1 6 -5 0

P W D L F A GD PTS

I.R. IRAN 1 1 0 0 8 3 5 3

UZBEKISTAN 1 0 0 1 3 8 -5 0

Semi Finals

3rd/4th Placing

Final

I.R. IRAN UZ-BEKISTAN CHINA P.R. JAPAN P W D L


F A

I.R. IRAN 7-0 1 1 0 0 7 0 7 3 2 0

UZBEKISTAN 4-3 1 1 0 0 4 3 1 3 2 0

CHINA P.R. 3-4 1 0 0 1 3 4 -1 0 1 0

JAPAN 0-7 1 0 0 1 0 7 -7 0 1 0

TOTAL 14 6 0

AVERAGE PER MATCH 7 3 0

JAPAN CHINA P.R. P W D LGOALS

GD PTS CAU. EXP.F A

JAPAN 6-1 1 1 0 0 6 1 5 3 2 0

CHINA P.R. 1-6 1 0 0 1 1 6 -5 0 1 1

TOTAL 7 3 1


I.R. IRAN UZ-BEKISTAN P W D L


F A

I.R. IRAN 8-3 1 1 0 0 8 3 5 3 0 0

UZBEKISTAN 3-8 1 0 0 1 3 8 -5 0 2 0

TOTAL 11 2 0


Tournament ResultsNo. Date Time Team A Score Team B Venue Group

1 5/23/2010 12:30 UZBEKISTAN 3 : 1 LEBANON Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group A

2 5/23/2010 12:30 THAILAND 4 : 2 KYRGYZSTAN IT University Complex, Tashkent Group C

3 5/23/2010 15:00 I.R. IRAN 19 : 2 TAJIKISTAN Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group B

4 5/23/2010 15:00 JAPAN 5 : 1 CHINA P.R. IT University Complex, Tashkent Group D

5 5/23/2010 17:30 CHINESE TAIPEI 1 : 6 INDONESIA Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group A

6 5/23/2010 17:30 VIETNAM 7 : 3 KOREA REPUBLIC IT University Complex, Tashkent Group C

7 5/23/2010 20:00 KUWAIT 2 : 4 AUSTRALIA Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group B

8 5/23/2010 20:00 TURKMENISTAN 3 : 5 IRAQ IT University Complex, Tashkent Group D

9 5/24/2010 12:30 LEBANON 6 : 4 CHINESE TAIPEI Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group A

10 5/24/2010 12:30 KYRGYZSTAN 4 : 2 VIETNAM IT University Complex, Tashkent Group C

11 5/24/2010 15:00 TAJIKISTAN 4 : 3 KUWAIT Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group B

12 5/24/2010 15:00 CHINA P.R. 6 : 2 TURKMENISTAN IT University Complex, Tashkent Group D

13 5/24/2010 17:30 INDONESIA 2 : 4 UZBEKISTAN Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group A

14 5/24/2010 17:30 KOREA REPUBLIC 3 : 10 THAILAND IT University Complex, Tashkent Group C

15 5/24/2010 20:00 AUSTRALIA 3 : 9 I.R. IRAN Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group B

16 5/24/2010 20:00 IRAQ 1 : 10 JAPAN IT University Complex, Tashkent Group D

17 5/25/2010 12:30 UZBEKISTAN 4 : 1 CHINESE TAIPEI Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group A

18 5/25/2010 12:30 INDONESIA 2 : 4 LEBANON IT University Complex, Tashkent Group A

19 5/25/2010 15:00 I.R. IRAN 7 : 0 KUWAIT Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group B

20 5/25/2010 15:00 AUSTRALIA 5 : 4 TAJIKISTAN IT University Complex, Tashkent Group B

21 5/25/2010 17:30 THAILAND 5 : 2 VIETNAM Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group C

22 5/25/2010 17:30 KOREA REPUBLIC 4 : 4 KYRGYZSTAN IT University Complex, Tashkent Group C

23 5/25/2010 20:00 JAPAN 1 : 0 TURKMENISTAN Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Group D

24 5/25/2010 20:00 IRAQ 6 : 7 CHINA P.R. IT University Complex, Tashkent Group D

25 5/27/2010 11:00 THAILAND 2 : 9 CHINA P.R. Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Quarter Finals

26 5/27/2010 14:00 JAPAN 4 : 0 KYRGYZSTAN Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Quarter Finals

27 5/27/2010 17:30 UZBEKISTAN 5 : 3 AUSTRALIA Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Quarter Finals

28 5/27/2010 20:30 I.R. IRAN 7 : 1 LEBANON Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Quarter Finals

29 5/28/2010 16:30 UZBEKISTAN 4 : 3 CHINA P.R. Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Semi Finals

30 5/28/2010 19:30 I.R. IRAN 7 : 0 JAPAN Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Semi Finals

31 5/30/2010 15:00 CHINA P.R. 1 : 6 JAPAN Uzbekistan Sports Complex, 3rd/4th Placing

32 5/30/2010 18:00 UZBEKISTAN 3 : 8 I.R. IRAN Uzbekistan Sports Complex, Final

22

UZBEKISTAN 2010


23

RESULT AND RANKING

Team Ranking Report

Country Stage RankingI.R. IRAN Final 1UZBEKISTAN Final 2JAPAN Final 3CHINA P.R. Final 4AUSTRALIA Final 5KYRGYZSTAN Final 6LEBANON Final 7THAILAND Final 8INDONESIA Final 9VIETNAM Final 10IRAQ Final 11TAJIKISTAN Final 12KOREA REPUBLIC Final 13TURKMENISTAN Final 14CHINESE TAIPEI Final 15KUWAIT Final 16MALAYSIA Qualification 17QATAR Qualification 18HONG KONG Qualification 19PHILIPPINES Qualification 20JORDAN Qualification 21BAHRAIN Qualification 22MYANMAR Qualification 23GUAM Qualification 24AFGHANISTAN Qualification 25MACAU Qualification 26CAMBODIA Qualification 27

24

UZBEKISTAN 2010


25

MATCH DATA

UZBEKISTAN v. LEBANON 3-1 (2-0)

UZB 1 UMAROV, 11 YUNUSOV, 2 IRSALIEV, 3 ELIBAEV, 4 TOJIBOEV, 13 SAMEGOV, 16 T.BERDIYEV, 18 SVIRI-DOV, 19 S.BERDIYEV, 5 FAYZULLAEV, 6 SHARIPOV, 7 TAJIBAEV

TEAM COACH SERGIO AGUIAR GUIMARAES FILHO

TEAM MANAGER JAHANGIR USMANOV

LEB 1 R. EL KHAKHI, 10 H. ATWI, 11 K. TAKAJI, 6 I. HAM-MOUD, 8 K. KAWSAN, 12 A.GEBEILY, 14 M.ITANI, 15 M. ISKANDARANI, 3 H. HAMMOUD, 5 H. CHAITO, 7 R. EL LADKI, 9 A. EL HOMSI

TEAM COACH: DORY ZAKHOUR

TEAM MANAGER: ELIAS RACHID EL KOSSAIFI

Scorers: 1-0 7' ELIBAEV(3), 2-0 10' TAJIBAEV(7), 2-1 34' K. TAKAJI(11), 3-1 40' IRSALIEV(2)

Referee: MIYATANI NAOKI (JPN)

Second Referee: KAZUYA ISOKAWA (JPN)

Third Referee: KIM JANG KWAN (KOR)

Time Keeper: PRASERT KRUTSRI (THA)

Match Commissioner

ABDUL GHAFOOR ABDUL HAMEED

Referee Inspector MOUSAVI SEYED SADRODDIN

CHINESE TAIPEI v. INDONESIA 1-6 (1-4)

TPE: 12 Y.H.CHIANG, 13 Y.L.CHEN, 2 C.J.FANG, 4 P.F.FENG, 8 C.A.LO, 1 W.C.PAN, 10 K.C.HUNG, 11 F.H.CHANG, 14 K.K.PAN, 3 P.Y.LIN, 5 M.C.LEE, 9 C.S.WANG

TEAM COACH CHEN, KUEI-JEN

TEAM MANAGER TSAI, CHIN-HSIANG

IDN 1 WICAKSONO, 15 HAIDAR, 17 PURNOMO, 4 OHORELLA, 8 V.HUTABARAT, 10 HANDOYO, 11 J.PURBA, 13 SAPUTRA, 18 B. HERA, 2 MAOLANA, 5 MATULESSY, 7 J.LADJANIBI

TEAM COACH: ROBBY HARTONO

TEAM MANAGER: DARIUS SINATHRYA KARTOPRAWIRO

Scorers: 1-0 1’ C.J.FANG(2), 1-1 3’ HAIDAR(15), 1-2 6’ V.HUTABARAT(8), 1-3 10’ MATULESSY(5), 1-4 19’ J.LADJANIBI(7), 1-5 25’ HANDOYO(10), 1-6 34’ B. HERA(18)

Referee: KIM JANG KWAN (KOR)

Second Referee: PRASERT KRUTSRI (THA)

Third Referee: MIYATANI NAOKI (JPN)

Time Keeper: KAZUYA ISOKAWA (JPN)

Match Commissioner

ABDUL GHAFOOR ABDUL HAMEED

Referee Inspector MOUSAVI SEYED SADRODDIN

INDONESIA v. UZBEKISTAN 2-4 (0-1)

IDN: 1 WICAKSONO, 17 PURNOMO, 4 OHORELLA, 8 V.HUTABARAT, 9 S.KARMADI, 10 HANDOYO, 11 J.PURBA, 13 SAPUTRA, 15 HAIDAR, 2 MAOLANA, 5 MATULESSY, 7 J.LADJANIBI

TEAM COACH ROBBY HARTONO

TEAM MANAGER DARIUS SINATHRYA KARTOPRAWIRO

UZB: 1 UMAROV, 11 YUNUSOV, 2 IRSALIEV, 3 ELI-BAEV, 4 TOJIBOEV, 10 AHMEDOV, 13 SAMEGOV, 16 T.BERDIYEV, 18 SVIRIDOV, 5 FAYZULLAEV, 6 SHARIPOV, 7 TAJIBAEV

TEAM COACH: SERGIO AGUIAR GUIMARAESFILHO

TEAM MANAGER: JAHANGIR USMANOV

Scorers: 0-1 12’ IRSALIEV(2), 1-1 27’ OHORELLA(4), 2-1 32’ J.PURBA(11), 2-2 32’ SAMEGOV(13), 2-3 33’ ELI-BAEV(3), 2-4 36’ SVIRIDOV(18)

Referee: ALI REZA SOHRABI BALSINI (IRN)

Second Referee: KIM JANG KWAN (KOR)

Third Referee: SCOTT KIDSON (AUS)

Time Keeper: CHRIS COLLEY (AUS)

Match Commissioner

KEMEL TOKABAEV (KYRGYZSTAN)

Referee Inspector SAMINATHEN MARIMUTHU (MALAYSIA)

INDONESIA v. LEBANON 2-4 (2-1)

IDN: 1 WICAKSONO, 17 PURNOMO, 4 OHORELLA, 8 V.HUTABARAT, 9 S.KARMADI, 10 HANDOYO, 13 SAPUTRA, 15 HAIDAR, 2 MAOLANA, 5 MATULESSY, 6 KARISMAWAN, 7 J.LADJANIBI

TEAM COACH ROBBY HARTONO

TEAM MANAGER DARIUS SINATHRYA KARTOPRAWIRO

LEB 1 R. EL KHAKHI, 10 H. ATWI, 11 K. TAKAJI, 6 I. HAM-MOUD, 8 K. KAWSAN, 14 M.ITANI, 15 M. ISKANDARA-NI, 19 H. HAMADANI, 3 H. HAMMOUD, 5 H. CHAITO, 7 R. EL LADKI, 9 A. EL HOMSI



Scorers: 1-0 14’ S.KARMADI(9), 1-1 18’ K. TAKAJI(11), 2-1 20’ HAIDAR(15), 2-2 21’ K. KAWSAN(8), 2-3 22’ K. KAW-SAN(8), 2-4 30’ K. TAKAJI(11)

Referee: CHRIS COLLEY (AUS)

Second Referee: RYAN JOHN SHEPHEARD (AUS)

Third Referee: MOHAMMED AL HADDAD (KUW)

Time Keeper: REY RITAGA (PHI)

Match Commissioner

DAVID DWIGHT (PHI)

Referee Inspector SAMINATHEN MARIMUTHU (MAS)

LEBANON v. TAIPEI 6-4 (3-1)

LEB 1 R. EL KHAKHI, 10 H. ATWI, 14 M.ITANI, 6 I. HAMMOUD, 8 K. KAWSAN, 12 A.GEBEILY, 15 M. ISKANDARANI, 19 H. HAMADANI, 3 H. HAMMOUD, 5 H. CHAITO, 7 R. EL LADKI, 9 A. EL HOMSI

TEAM COACH DORY ZAKHOUR

TEAM MANAGER ELIAS RACHID EL KOSSAIFI

TPE 11 F.H.CHANG, 12 Y.H.CHIANG, 14 K.K.PAN, 5 M.C.LEE, 9 C.S.WANG, 1 W.C.PAN, 10 K.C.HUNG, 13 Y.L.CHEN, 2 C.J.FANG, 3 P.Y.LIN, 4 P.F.FENG, 8 C.A.LO

TEAM COACH: CHEN, KUEI-JEN

TEAM MANAGER: TSAI, CHIN-HSIANG

Scorers: 1-0 10’ H. CHAITO(5), 2-0 10’ H. CHAITO(5), 2-1 11’ C.S.WANG(9), 3-1 13’ H. ATWI(10), 4-1 21’ K. KAW-SAN(8), 5-1 25’ K. KAWSAN(8), 6-1 30’ H. ATWI(10), 6-2 34’ C.J.FANG(2), 6-3 35’ C.J.FANG(2), 6-4 38’ C.J.FANG(2)

Referee: SCOTT KIDSON (AUS)

Second Referee: CHRIS COLLEY (AUS)

Third Referee: ALI REZA SOHRABI BALSINI (IRN)

Time Keeper: KIM JANG KWAN (KOR)

Match Commissioner

TOKABAEV KEMEL (KGY)

Referee Inspector SAMINATHEN MARIMUTHU (MAS)

UZBEKISTAN v. CHINESE TAIPEI 4-1 (1-0)

UZB: 11 YUNUSOV, 16 T.BERDIYEV, 3 ELIBAEV, 4 TOJI-BOEV, 7 TAJIBAEV, 10 AHMEDOV, 12 KRAVCHENKO, 13 SAMEGOV, 18 SVIRIDOV, 19 S.BERDIYEV, 5 FAYZULLAEV, 6 SHARIPOV



TPE 12 Y.H.CHIANG, 13 Y.L.CHEN, 2 C.J.FANG, 4 P.F.FENG, 8 C.A.LO, 10 K.C.HUNG, 11 F.H.CHANG, 14 K.K.PAN, 3 P.Y.LIN, 5 M.C.LEE, 6 C.H.WEN, 9 C.S.WANG

TEAM COACH: CHEN, KUEI-JEN

TEAM MANAGER: TSAI, CHIN-HSIANG

Scorers: 1-0 7' ELIBAEV(3), 1-1 21' C.A.LO(8), 2-1 33' TAJIBAEV(7), 3-1 34' YUNUSOV(11), 4-1 40' YUNUS-OV(11)

Referee: VAHID ARZPEYMA MOHAMAREH (IRN)

Second Referee: ALI REZA SOHRABI BALSINI (IRN)

Third Referee: PRASERT KRUTSRI (THA)

Time Keeper: VADIM BARATOV (TKM)

Match Commissioner


Referee Inspector MATSUZAKI YASUHIRO (JPN)

Group A

P W D L F A GD PTS

UZBEKISTAN 3 3 0 0 11 4 7 9

LEBANON 3 2 0 1 11 9 2 6

INDONESIA 3 1 0 2 10 9 1 3

CHINESE TAIPEI 3 0 0 3 6 16 -10 0

26

UZBEKISTAN 2010


27

MATCH DATA

IRAN v. TAJIKISTAN 19-2 (8-0)

IRN 10 M. TAHERI, 12 M.NAZARI, 4 M.KESHAVARZ, 7 A.HASSANZADEH, 9 M. DANESHVAR, 1 H. ABRARIN-IA, 11 M. ZAHMATKESH, 17 M.TAYYBI, 3 H. SOLTANI, 5 M.HASHEMZADEH, 6 J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM, 8 M.RAEISI

TEAM COACH HOSSEIN SHAMS

TEAM MANAGER GHAHREMANI KERI BOZORG ASGHAR

TJK 1 SHARIPOV, 10 JUMAEV, 5 FAYZULLAEV, 6 FATKHU-LOEV, 9 MAHMUDOV, 14 AKNAZAROV, 15 BIBUDOV, 17 MAMEDBABAEV, 2 VASIEV, 3 NIYATBEKOV, 4 ZUBAYDOV, 7 ISMOILOV

TEAM COACH: KAMALETDINOV DAMIR

TEAM MANAGER: SATTOROV SHAFKAT

Scorers: 1-0 1’ A.HASSANZADEH(7), 2-0 2’ A.HASSANZADEH (7), 3-0 4’ A.HASSANZADEH (7), 4-0 4’ M. TAHERI (10), 5-0 6’ M. ZAHMATKESH (11), 6-0 8’ M. ZAH-MATKESH(11), 7-0 12’ M. TAHERI (10), 8-0 18’ M. DANESHVAR (9), 9-0 21’ M. TAHERI (10), 10-0 22’ M. DANESHVAR (9), 11-0 22’ M. TAHERI (10), 12-0 23’ M. TAHERI (10), 13-0 24’ M.RAEISI (8), 13-1 26’ VASIEV (2), 14-1 28’ M. TAHERI (10), 15-1 30’ M. DANESHVAR (9), 16-1 32’ M. ZAHMATKESH (11), 16-2 33’ FATKHU-LOEV (6), 17-2 37’ M. DANESHVAR (9), 18-2 37’ M.TAYYBI (17), 19-2 38’ M. TAHERI (10)

Referee: HUSEIN MAHMOUD HUSEIN KHALAILEH (JOR)

Second Referee: ABDULRAHMAN ABDULQADER ABDULRAHMAN ABDULLA (BHR)

Third Referee: MOHAMAD CHAMI (LEB)

Time Keeper: VADIM BARATOV (TKM)

Match Commissioner


Referee Inspector WONG ANDY (HK)

AUSTRALIA v. IRAN 3-9 (3-3)

AUS 11 NGALUAFE, 14 FOGARTY, 2 SPATHIS, 4 G. GIOVENALI, 7 SEETO, 1 KONSTANTINOU, 12 ADELI, 13 ROGIC, 15 MILLER, 3 ROSS MAGEE, 5 KEITH, 9 LOCKHART

TEAM COACH STEVE KNIGHT

TEAM MANAGER CHRISTOPHER CONTI

IRN 11 M. ZAHMATKESH, 12 M.NAZARI, 3 H. SOLTANI, 5 M.HASHEMZADEH, 6 J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM, 10 M. TAHERI, 17 M.TAYYBI, 18 A. RAHNAMA, 19 M. NASIR-NIA, 4 M.KESHAVARZ, 8 M.RAEISI, 9 M. DANESHVAR

TEAM COACH: HOSSEIN SHAMS

TEAM MANAGER: GHAHREMANI KERI BOZORG ASGHAR

Scorers: 0-1 4’ M. ZAHMATKESH(11), 0-2 8’ M. TAHERI(10), 1-2 9’ FOGARTY(14), 2-2 12’ G. GIOVENALI(4) Pen, 2-3 14’ M.KESHAVARZ(4), 3-3 18’ ROGIC(13), 3-4 24’ M.TAYYBI(17), 3-5 29’ M. ZAHMATKESH(11), 3-6 32’ M. TAHERI(10), 3-7 38’ J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM(6), 3-8 39’ A. RAHNAMA(18), 3-9 40’ M.TAYYBI(17)

Referee: VADIM BARATOV (TKM)

Second Referee: MOHAMAD CHAMI (LEB)

Third Referee: PRASERT KRUTSRI (THA)

Time Keeper: NURDIN BUKUEV (KGZ)

Match Commissioner

DAVID DWIGHT (PHI)


IRAN v. KUWAIT 7-0 (2-0)

IRN 10 M. TAHERI, 19 M. NASIRNIA, 4 M.KESHAVARZ, 5 M.HASHEMZADEH, 9 M. DANESHVAR, 1 H. ABRARINIA, 11 M. ZAHMATKESH, 17 M.TAYYBI, 18 A. RAHNAMA, 3 H. SOLTANI, 6 J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM, 8 M.RAEISI



KUW 11 HAMZAH M., 18 S. AL MEKAIMI, 20 SAYYED MOSAWY, 6 S.ALMARTAH, 7 H. ALOTHMAN, 1 F. ALBAGHLI, 14 S. AMAN, 17 M. ASHKANANI, 19 M. AL-DOUSARI, 4 A. ALBASAM, 5 H. HAYAT, 9 A. AL BUTAI

TEAM COACH: EISA SAADOUN

TEAM MANAGER: SALEM M S S ALENEZY

Scorers: 1-0 6' M. DANESHVAR(9), 2-0 9' M.HASHEMZADEH(5), 3-0 22' M.TAYYBI(17), 4-0 31' M.TAYYBI(17), 5-0 36' M. ZAHMATKESH(11), 6-0 39' M. TAHERI(10)

Referee: MIYATANI NAOKI (JPN)

Second Referee: KAZUYA ISOKAWA (JPN)

Third Referee: MOHAMAD CHAMI (LEB)

Time Keeper: HUSEIN MAHMOUD HUSEIN KHALAILEH (JOR)

Match Commissioner

TALAL ALSWAILMYEEN (JOR)

Referee Inspector WONG ANDY (HK)

TAJIKISTAN v. KUWAIT 4-3 (3-0)

TJK 1 SHARIPOV, 11 ULMASOV, 5 FAYZULLAEV, 6 FATKHULOEV, 9 MAHMUDOV, 10 JUMAEV, 14 AKNAZAROV, 15 BIBUDOV, 17 MAMEDBABAEV, 2 VASIEV, 4 ZUBAYDOV, 7 ISMOILOV

TEAM COACH KAMALETDINOV DAMIR

TEAM MANAGER SATTOROV SHAFKAT

KUW 14 S. AMAN, 15 O. AL JASER, 18 S. AL MEKAIMI, 20 SAYYED MOSAWY, 7 H. ALOTHMAN, 1 F. ALBAGHLI, 11 HAMZAH M., 19 M. ALDOUSARI, 4 A. ALBASAM, 5 H. HAYAT, 6 S.ALMARTAH, 8 M. AL NAKKAS

TEAM COACH: EISA SAADOUN

TEAM MANAGER: SALEM M S S ALENEZY

Scorers: 1-0 3' ULMASOV(11), 2-0 6' MAHMUDOV(9), 3-0 18' ULMASOV(11), 3-1 23' S. AMAN(14), 3-2 25' HAMZAH M.(11), 4-2 38' ULMASOV(11), 4-3 39' O. AL JASER(15)

Referee: PRASERT KRUTSRI (THA)

Second Referee: NURDIN BUKUEV (KGZ)

Third Referee: VADIM BARATOV (TKM)

Time Keeper: MOHAMAD CHAMI (LIB)

Match Commissioner

DAVID DWIGHT (PHI)

Referee Inspector MOUSAVI SEYED SADRODDIN (IRN)

AUSTRALIA v TAJIKISTAN 5-4 (2-2)

AUS 11 NGALUAFE, 14 FOGARTY, 2 SPATHIS, 4 G. GIOVENALI, 7 SEETO, 1 KONSTANTINOU, 12 ADELI, 13 ROGIC, 15 MILLER, 3 ROSS MAGEE, 5 KEITH, 9 LOCKHART

TEAM COACH STEVE KNIGHT

TEAM MANAGER CHRISTOPHER CONTI

TJK 1 SHARIPOV, 11 ULMASOV, 5 FAYZULLAEV, 6 FATKHULOEV, 9 MAHMUDOV, 10 JUMAEV, 14 AKNAZAROV, 15 BIBUDOV, 17 MAMEDBABAEV, 2 VASIEV, 3 NIYATBEKOV, 7 ISMOILOV

TEAM COACH: KAMALETDINOV DAMIR

TEAM MANAGER: SATTOROV SHAFKAT

Scorers: 0-1 5’ MAHMUDOV(9), 0-2 8’ JUMAEV(10), 1-2 14’ G. GIOVENALI(4), 2-2 20’ MILLER(15), 2-3 22’ JU-MAEV(10), 3-3 23’ ROGIC(13), 4-3 26’ MILLER(15), 4-4 30’ JUMAEV(10), 5-4 36’ ROGIC(13)

Referee: REY RITAGA (PHI)


Third Referee: NURDIN BUKUEV (KGZ)

Time Keeper: ABDULRAHMAN ABDULQADER ABDULRAHMAN ABDULLA (BHR)

Match Commissioner

ABDUL GHAFOOR ABDUL HAMEED ( MALDIVES)

Referee Inspector MOUSAVI SEYED SADRODDIN (IRN)

KUWAIT v. AUSTRALIA 2-4 (1-2)

KUW 15 O. AL JASER, 18 S. AL MEKAIMI, 20 SAYYED MOSAWY, 7 H. ALOTHMAN, 8 M. AL NAKKAS, 1 F. ALBAGHLI, 11 HAMZAH M., 14 S. AMAN, 19 M. AL-DOUSARI, 4 A. ALBASAM, 5 H. HAYAT, 6 S.ALMARTAH

TEAM COACH MOUSAVI SEYED SADRODDIN Country I.R. IRAN

TEAM MANAGER SALEM M S S ALENEZY

AUS 14 FOGARTY, 2 SPATHIS, 4 G. GIOVENALI, 5 KEITH, 7 SEETO, 1 KONSTANTINOU, 11 NGALUAFE, 12 ADELI, 13 ROGIC, 15 MILLER, 17 MCANDREW, 9 LOCKHART

TEAM COACH: STEVE KNIGHT

TEAM MANAGER: CHRISTOPHER CONTI

Scorers: 0-1 16’ ROGIC(13), 0-2 17’ NGALUAFE(11), 1-2 19’ S. AL MEKAIMI(18), 1-3 21’ ROGIC(13), 2-3 34’ O. AL JASER(15), 2-4 40’ ROGIC(13)

Referee: MOHAMAD CHAMI (LEB)

Second Referee: VADIM BARATOV (TKM)

Third Referee: HUSEIN MAHMOUD HUSEIN KHALAILEH (JOR)


Match Commissioner


Referee Inspector WONG PO ON, ANDY ( HK)

Group B

P W D L F A GD PTS

I.R. IRAN 3 3 0 0 35 5 30 9

AUSTRALIA 3 2 0 1 12 15 -3 6

TAJIKISTAN 3 1 0 2 10 27 -17 3

KUWAIT 3 0 0 3 5 15 -10 0

28

UZBEKISTAN 2010


29

Group CTHAILAND v. KYRGYZSTAN 4-2 (1-2)

THA 12 S.TOMPA, 13 S.KHUMTHINKAEW, 5 L.ISSARASUWIPAKORN, 6 P.SAISORN, 9 S.THUEANKLANG, 10 E.SURATSAWANG, 14 K.CHALAEMKHET, 15 N.THUSIRI, 2 P.PANDEE, 7

TEAM COACH PARZOS MANDEZ JOSE MARIA

TEAM MANAGER MOHAMED IQBAL MARICAR

KGZ 1 KIRIL, 15 AZAMAT, 4 DILSHAT, 7 NURJAN, 9 ABEK, 11 VADIM, 14 AZAMAT, 16 VITALII, 17 EMIL, 18 ERKIN, 5 ZAKIR, 8 GULBEK

TEAM COACH: MUKANOV AMIRZHAN

TEAM MANAGER: ISHENBAEV MAKSATBEK

Scorers: 0-1 3' AZAMAT(15), 0-2 14' VADIM(11), 1-2 18' K.CHALAEMKHET(14), 2-2 21' E.SURATSAWANG(10), 3-2 32' S.THUEANKLANG(9), 4-2 38' ERKIN(18)

Referee: RYAN JOHN SHEPHEARD (AUS)

Second Referee: SCOTT KIDSON (AUS)

Third Referee: CHRIS COLLEY (AUS)


Match Commissioner

DAVID DWIGHT (PHI)


KYRGYZSTAN v. VIETNAM 4-2 (2-0)


TEAM COACH MUKANOV AMIRZHAN

TEAM MANAGER ISHENBAEV MAKSATBEK

VIE 10 N.B.QUAN, 17 T.H.VINH, 20 D.P.ANH, 5 P.M.GIANG, 8 N.Q.MINH, 11 N.H.GIANG, 12 T.Q.TUAN, 16 N.D.KHANH, 18 N.Q.BAO, 19 N.V.HUY, 4 N.T.THIEN, 7 H.B.TUAN

TEAM COACH: GARGELLI SERGIO

TEAM MANAGER: TRAN ANH TU

Scorers: 1-0 15’ DILSHAT(4), 2-0 19’ GULBEK(8), 3-0 24’ NUR-JAN(7), 3-1 27’ T.H.VINH(17), 3-2 34’ T.H.VINH(17), 4-2 39’ DILSHAT(4)

Referee: KAZUYA ISOKAWA (JPN)

Second Referee: VAHID ARZPEYMA MOHAMAREH (IRN)

Third Referee: MIYATANI NAOKI (JPN)


Match Commissioner


Referee Inspector ANDY WONG (HK)

THAILAND v. VIETNAM 5-2 (3-1)

THA 10 E.SURATSAWANG, 12 S.TOMPA, 4 P.JANTA, 5 L.ISSARASUWIPAKORN, 9 S.THUEANKLANG, 13 S.KHUMTHINKAEW, 14 K.CHALAEMKHET, 15 N.THUSIRI, 2 P.PANDEE, 6 P.SAISORN, 7 K.WONGKAEO, 8 T.SANTANAPRASIT



VIE 10 N.B.QUAN, 17 T.H.VINH, 19 N.V.HUY, 5 P.M.GIANG, 8 N.Q.MINH, 11 N.H.GIANG, 12 T.Q.TUAN, 15 N.A.DUNG, 18 N.Q.BAO, 2 L.T.CUONG, 4 N.T.THIEN, 7 H.B.TUAN

TEAM COACH: GARGELLI SERGIO

TEAM MANAGER: TRAN ANH TU

Scorers: 1-0 3' S.THUEANKLANG(9), 1-1 9' N.Q.BAO(18), 2-1 11' S.THUEANKLANG(9), 3-1 15' N.THUSIRI(15), 4-1 29' T.Q.TUAN(12), 5-1 33' L.ISSARASUWIPAKORN(5), 5-2 35' T.Q.TUAN(12)

Referee: VADIM BARATOV (TKM)

Second Referee: HUSEIN MAHMOUD HUSEIN KHALAILEH (JOR)

Third Referee: SCOTT KIDSON (AUS)

Time Keeper: KAZUYA ISOKAWA (JPN)

Match Commissioner

KEMEL TOKABAEV (KGY)

Referee Inspector YASUHIRO MATSUZAKI (JPN)

VIETNAM v. KOREA 7-3 (2-1)

VIE 10 N.B.QUAN, 11 N.H.GIANG, 17 T.H.VINH, 20 D.P.ANH, 5 P.M.GIANG, 12 T.Q.TUAN, 15 N.A.DUNG, 18 N.Q.BAO, 19 N.V.HUY, 2 L.T.CUONG, 4 N.T.THIEN, 7 H.B.TUAN

TEAM COACH GARGELLI SERGIO

TEAM MANAGER TRAN ANH TU

KOR 1 MIN KYU, 11 JONG HOON, 19 BYUNG JUN, 8 JEONG NAM, 9 HYUN JONG, 12 CHANG WOO, 16 SUNG MIN, 18 KYUNG MOOK, 2 JIN WON, 3 MYUNG BUM, 4 EUI HYUN, 7 MIN GYU

TEAM COACH: LEE CHANG HWAN

TEAM MANAGER: KIM SEUNG JUN

Scorers: 0-1 3' JEONG NAM(8), 1-1 4' N.T.THIEN(4), 2-1 10' N.T.THIEN(4), 3-1 23' N.T.THIEN(4), 4-1 32' N.H.GIANG(11), 4-2 33' JEONG NAM(8), 5-2 37' T.H.VINH(17), 6-2 40' H.B.TUAN(7)


Second Referee: REY RITAGA (PHI)

Third Referee: RYAN JOHN SHEPHEARD (AUS)

Time Keeper: SCOTT KIDSON (AUS)

Match Commissioner

DAVID DWIGHT (PHI)


KOREA v. THAILAND 3-10 (0-6)

KOR 10 IN WOO, 11 JONG HOON, 19 BYUNG JUN, 3 MYUNG BUM, 8 JEONG NAM, 1 MIN KYU, 12 CHANG WOO, 18 KYUNG MOOK, 4 EUI HYUN, 6 DAE SUNG, 7 MIN GYU, 9 HYUN JONG

TEAM COACH LEE CHANG HWAN

TEAM MANAGER KIM SEUNG JUN

THA 10 E.SURATSAWANG, 12 S.TOMPA, 4 P.JANTA, 5 L.ISSARASUWIPAKORN, 9 S.THUEANKLANG, 13 S.KHUMTHINKAEW, 14 K.CHALAEMKHET, 15 N.THUSIRI, 2 P.PANDEE, 6 P.SAISORN, 7 K.WONGKAEO, 8 T.SANTANAPRASIT

TEAM COACH: PARZOS MANDEZ JOSE MARIA

TEAM MANAGER: MOHAMED IQBAL MARICAR

Scorers: 0-1 1’ L.ISSARASUWIPAKORN(5), 0-2 1’ L.ISSARASUWIPAKORN(5), 0-3 4’ S.THUEANKLANG(9), 0-4 6’ N.THUSIRI(15), 0-5 12’ K.WONGKAEO(7), 0-6 16’ P.JANTA(4), 1-6 24’ EUI HYUN(4), 1-7 25’ S.THUEANKLANG(9), 2-7 30’ JEONG NAM(8), 2-8 30’ K.CHALAEMKHET(14), 3-8 37’ JEONG NAM(8), 3-9 37’ K.CHALAEMKHET(14), 3-10 39’ K.CHALAEMKHET(14)

Referee: REY RITAGA (PHI)

Second Referee: MIYATANI NAOKI (JPN)

Third Referee: KAZUYA ISOKAWA (JPN)

Time Keeper: VAHID ARZPEYMA MOHAMAREH (IRN)

Match Commissioner



KOREA v. KYRGYZSTAN 4-4 (1-2)

KOR 1 MIN KYU, 10 IN WOO, 11 JONG HOON, 4 EUI HYUN, 8 JEONG NAM, 12 CHANG WOO, 16 SUNG MIN, 2 JIN WON, 3 MYUNG BUM, 6 DAE SUNG, 7 MIN GYU, 9 HYUN JONG

TEAM COACH LEE CHANG HWAN

TEAM MANAGER KIM SEUNG JUN




Scorers: 0-1 1' DILSHAT(4), 1-1 3' EUI HYUN(4), 1-2 12' GUL-BEK(8), 2-2 29' DAE SUNG(6), 2-3 30' AZAMAT(15), 3-3 33' EUI HYUN(4), 3-4 39' AZAMAT(15), 4-4 40' EUI HYUN(4)

Referee: ABDULRAHMAN ABDULQADER ABDULRAHMAN ABDULLA (BHR)

Second Referee: MOHAMMED AL HADDAD (KUW)

Third Referee: RYAN JOHN SHEPHEARD (AUS)

Time Keeper: MIYATANI NAOKI (JPN)

Match Commissioner

DAVID DWIGHT (PHI)

Referee Inspector SEYED MOUSAVI (IRN)

MATCH DATA

P W D L F A GD PTS

THAILAND 3 3 0 0 19 7 12 9

KYRGYZSTAN 3 1 1 1 10 10 0 4

VIETNAM 3 1 0 2 11 12 -1 3

KOREA REPUBLIC 3 0 1 2 10 21 -11 1

30

UZBEKISTAN 2010


31

Group D

JAPAN v. CHINA P.R. 5-1 (3-0)

JAP 1 KAWAHARA, 10 KOGURE, 11 TAKAHASHI, 5 MU-RAKAMI, 8 KAMISAWA, 12 FUJIWARA, 16 YOSHIDA, 2 SUGAWARA, 4 KOMIYAMA, 6 OSODO, 7 MATSUMIYA, 9 HOSHI

TEAM COACH MIGUEL RODRIGO

TEAM MANAGER MURAYAMA TSUTOMU

CHN 1 ZHENG T, 13 HU J, 2 LIANG SH, 7 ZHANG J, 9 ZHANG X, 12 LI X, 16 XIA X, 19 CONG L, 20 ZENG Q, 3 WANG W, 4 HUANG H, 6 ZHANG XI

TEAM COACH: GUILHERME CARVALHO FRANCO DA SILVEIRA

TEAM MANAGER: FU YUPEI

Scorers: 1-0 5’ KAMISAWA(8), 2-0 18’ MURAKAMI(5), 3-0 27’ KOMIYAMA(4), 4-0 35’ KAMISAWA(8)

Referee: NURDIN BUKUEV (KGZ)


Third Referee: VAHID ARZPEYMA MOHAMAREH (IRN)

Time Keeper: MOHAMMED AL HADDAD (KUW)

Match Commissioner


Referee Inspector SAMINATHEN MARIMUTHU (MAL)

CHINA P.R. v. TURKMENISTAN 6-2 (4-2)

CHN 1 ZHENG T, 13 HU J, 2 LIANG SH, 6 ZHANG XI, 9 ZHANG X, 12 LI X, 16 XIA X, 19 CONG L, 20 ZENG Q, 3 WANG W, 4 HUANG H, 7 ZHANG J

TEAM COACH GUILHERME CARVALHO FRANCO DA SILVEIRA

TEAM MANAGER FU YUPEI

TKM 1 TASHLIYEV, 11 ATAYEV M., 13 ORAZOW, 3 ESEN-MAMEDOV, 9 CHARIYEV, 15 A. VATAN, 16 MEREDOV, 2 MUHAMMEDOV, 4 ANNAMEREDOV, 6 OVEZOV, 7 A. SERDARALI, 8 KANAYEV

TEAM COACH: KUROCHKIN VICTOR

TEAM MANAGER: IMAMGULYYEV JOMART

Scorers: 1-0 2’ ZHANG XI(6), 2-0 3’ ZHENG T(1), 2-1 3’ CHARI-YEV(9), 3-1 4’ ZHANG X(9), 3-2 15’ ATAYEV M.(11), 4-2 15’ HUANG H(4), 5-2 25’ LIANG SH(2), 6-2 38’ HUANG H(4)

Referee: ABDULRAHMAN ABDULQADER ABDULRAHMAN ABDULLA (BHR)


Third Referee: HUSEIN MAHMOUD HUSEIN KHALAILEH (JOR)

Time Keeper: MOHAMMED AL HADDAD (KUW)

Match Commissioner

ABDUL GHAFOOR ABDUL HAMEED (MALDIVES)


JAPAN v. TURKMENISTAN 1-0 (1-0)

JPN 1 KAWAHARA, 11 TAKAHASHI, 5 MURAKAMI, 7 MAT-SUMIYA, 8 KAMISAWA, 10 KOGURE, 12 FUJIWARA, 16 YOSHIDA, 18 TAKITA, 2 SUGAWARA, 4 KOMI-YAMA, 9 HOSHI



TKM 1 TASHLIYEV, 10 MUHAMEDMURADOV, 11 ATAYEV M., 13 ORAZOW, 9 CHARIYEV, 16 MEREDOV, 2 MU-HAMMEDOV, 3 ESENMAMEDOV, 4 ANNAMEREDOV, 6 OVEZOV, 7 A. SERDARALI, 8 KANAYEV

TEAM COACH: KUROCHKIN VICTOR

TEAM MANAGER: IMAMGULYYEV JOMART

Scorers: 1-0 11’ KAMISAWA(8)


Second Referee: PRASERT KRUTSRI (THA)

Third Referee: KIM JANG KWAN (KOR)


Match Commissioner



TURKMENISTAN v. IRAQ 3-5 (1-1)

TKM 1 TASHLIYEV, 10 MUHAMEDMURADOV, 11 ATAYEV M., 13 ORAZOW, 9 CHARIYEV, 16 MEREDOV, 2 MUHAMMEDOV, 3 ESENMAMEDOV, 5 ANNAYEV, 6 OVEZOV, 7 A. SERDARALI, 8 KANAYEV

TEAM COACH KUROCHKIN VICTOR

TEAM MANAGER IMAMGULYYEV JOMART

IRQ 1 UTAYL KHALEEL ABDULQADER TAMADHI, 11 KARRAR MOHSIN. M, 2 MUSTAFA. B, 5 HUSSIN. A, 8 HASHIM. K, 10 ABDULKAREEM, 14 HAITHAM. A, 15 OMAR. K, 4 LABID, 6 MUSTAFA. S, 7 ADMON, 9 ZAMAN. M

TEAM COACH: ASAAD LAZIM ALI AL-HAMADANI

TEAM MANAGER: SUBHI RAHEEM ABDUL NABI

Scorers: 0-1 4’ KARRAR MOHSIN. M(11), 1-1 5’ MUHAMEDMU-RADOV(10), 1-2 28’ MUSTAFA. B(2), 2-2 33’ MU-HAMMEDOV(2), 2-3 35’ KARRAR MOHSIN. M(11), 3-3 35’ ESENMAMEDOV(3), 3-4 38’ MUSTAFA. B(2)

Referee: VAHID ARZPEYMA MOHAMAREH (IRN)



Time Keeper: ALI REZA SOHRABI BALSINI (IRN)

Match Commissioner



IRAQ v. JAPAN 1-10 ( 1-3)

IRQ 1 UTAYL KHALEEL ABDULQADER TAMADHI, 11 KARRAR MOHSIN. M, 2 MUSTAFA. B, 5 HUSSIN. A, 6 MUSTAFA. S, 10 ABDULKAREEM, 14 HAITHAM. A, 15 OMAR. K, 4 LABID, 7 ADMON, 8 HASHIM. K, 9 ZAMAN. M

TEAM COACH ASAAD LAZIM ALI AL-HAMADANI

TEAM MANAGER SUBHI RAHEEM ABDUL NABI

JPN 1 KAWAHARA, 11 TAKAHASHI, 5 MURAKAMI, 6 OS-ODO, 8 KAMISAWA, 10 KOGURE, 12 FUJIWARA, 16 YOSHIDA, 18 TAKITA, 2 SUGAWARA, 7 MATSUMIYA, 9 HOSHI

TEAM COACH: MIGUEL RODRIGO

TEAM MANAGER: MURAYAMA TSUTOMU

Scorers: -1 2' KAMISAWA (8), 0-2 3' KAMISAWA (8), 1-2 10' ZAMAN. M(9), 1-3 11' KOGURE(10), 1-4 21' OSODO(6), 1-5 23' TAKAHASHI(11), 1-6 26' HOSHI(9), 1-7 27' YOSHIDA(16), 1-8 31' TAKAHASHI(11), 1-9 36' OS-ODO(6), 1-10 36' MATSUMIYA(7)

Referee: MOHAMMED AL HADDAD (KUW)

Second Referee: HUSEIN MAHMOUD HUSEIN KHALAILEH (JOR)

Third Referee: ABDULRAHMAN ABDULQADER ABDULRAHMAN ABDULLA (BHR)

Time Keeper: RYAN JOHN SHEPHEARD (AUS)

Match Commissioner


Referee Inspector SEYED MOUSAVI ( IRN)

IRAQ v. CHINA P.R. 1-5 (0-2)

IRQ 1 UTAYL KHALEEL ABDULQADER TAMADHI, 11 KARRAR MOHSIN. M, 2 MUSTAFA. B, 6 MUSTAFA. S, 7 ADMON, 10 ABDULKAREEM, 14 HAITHAM. A, 15 OMAR. K, 4 LABID, 8 HASHIM. K, 9 ZAMAN. M

TEAM COACH ASAAD LAZIM ALI AL-HAMADANI

TEAM MANAGER SUBHI RAHEEM ABDUL NABI

CHN 1 ZHENG T, 13 HU J, 2 LIANG SH, 6 ZHANG XI, 9 ZHANG X, 11 WANG TIAN YI, 12 LI X, 16 XIA X, 19 CONG L, 20 ZENG Q, 4 HUANG H, 7 ZHANG J



Scorers: 0-1 3' ZHANG XI(6), 0-2 10' ZHANG J(7), 0-3 22' ZHANG XI(6), 1-3 23' KARRAR MOHSIN. M(11), 1-4 24' LI X(12), 1-5 29' WANG TIAN YI(11)

Referee: NURDIN BUKUEV (KGZ)

Second Referee: MOHAMAD CHAMI (LEB)

Third Referee: ALI REZA SOHRABI BALSINI (IRN)

Time Keeper: VAHID ARZPEYMA MOHAMAREH (IRN)

Match Commissioner



MATCH DATA

P W D L F A GD PTS

JAPAN 3 3 0 0 16 2 14 9

CHINA P.R. 3 2 0 1 14 13 1 6

IRAQ 3 1 0 2 12 20 -8 3

TURKMENISTAN 3 0 0 3 5 12 -7 0

32

UZBEKISTAN 2010


33

MATCH DATA

Quarter-Final

IRAN v. LEBANON 7-1 (4-1)

IRN 10 M. TAHERI, 12 M.NAZARI, 17 M.TAYYBI, 4 M.KESHAVARZ, 9 M. DANESHVAR, 1 H. ABRARINIA, 11 M. ZAHMATKESH, 18 A. RAHNAMA, 3 H. SOLTANI, 5 M.HASHEMZADEH, 6 J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM, 8 M.RAEISI



LEB 1 R. EL KHAKHI, 10 H. ATWI, 11 K. TAKAJI, 6 I. HAM-MOUD, 8 K. KAWSAN, 12 A.GEBEILY, 14 M.ITANI, 15 M. ISKANDARANI, 3 H. HAMMOUD, 5 H. CHAITO, 7 R. EL LADKI, 9 A. EL HOMSI



Scorers: 1-0 7' M.KESHAVARZ(4), 2-0 9' M.HASHEMZADEH(5), 2-1 11' H. CHAITO(5), 3-1 13' M. DANESHVAR(9), 4-1 14' M.TAYYBI(17), 5-1 24' M. DANESHVAR(9), 6-1 27' M. ZAHMATKESH(11), 7-1 34' M. TAHERI(10)



Third Referee: ABDULRAHMAN ABDULQADER ABDULRAHMAN ABDULLA (BHR)


Match Commissioner



JAPAN v. KYRGYZSTAN 4-0 (2-0)

JPN 1 KAWAHARA, 10 KOGURE, 11 TAKAHASHI, 5 MU-RAKAMI, 8 KAMISAWA, 12 FUJIWARA, 16 YOSHIDA, 2 SUGAWARA, 4 KOMIYAMA, 6 OSODO, 7 MATSUMIYA, 9 HOSHI






Scorers: 1-0 8' KOMIYAMA(4), 2-0 16' MATSUMIYA(7), 3-0 33' MURAKAMI(5), 4-0 40' HOSHI(9)

Referee: KIM JANG KWAN (KOR)



Time Keeper: PRASERT KRUTSRI (THA)

Match Commissioner



THAILAND v. CHINA 2-9 (1-4)

THAI 10 E.SURATSAWANG, 12 S.TOMPA, 4 P.JANTA, 5 L.ISSARASUWIPAKORN, 9 S.THUEANKLANG, 13 S.KHUMTHINKAEW, 14 K.CHALAEMKHET, 15 N.THUSIRI, 2 P.PANDEE, 3 N.SUTTIROJ, 6 P.SAISORN, 8 T.SANTANAPRASIT






Scorers: 0-1 2’ ZHANG XI(6), 1-1 8’ S.THUEANKLANG(9), 1-2 9’ WANG W(3), 1-3 9’ ZHANG XI(6), 1-4 17’ ZHANG X(9), 2-4 28’ P.JANTA(4), 2-5 30’ LIANG SH(2), 2-6 31’ ZHANG XI(6), 2-7 31’ LI X(12), 2-8 33’ WANG W(3), 2-9 39’ LIANG SH(2)

Referee: ALI REZA SOHRABI BALSINI (IRN)

Second Referee: VAHID ARZPEYMA MOHAMAREH (IRN)

Third Referee: REY RITAGA (PHI)


Match Commissioner

KEMEL TOKABAEV (KYG)


UZBEKISTAN v. AUSTRALIA 5-3 (1-1)

UZB 1 UMAROV, 11 YUNUSOV, 3 ELIBAEV, 4 TOJI-BOEV, 7 TAJIBAEV, 10 AHMEDOV, 13 SAMEGOV, 16 T.BERDIYEV, 18 SVIRIDOV, 2 IRSALIEV, 5 FAYZUL-LAEV, 6 SHARIPOV



AUS 11 NGALUAFE, 14 FOGARTY, 15 MILLER, 2 SPATHIS, 4 G. GIOVENALI, 1 KONSTANTINOU, 12 ADELI, 13 ROGIC, 17 MCANDREW, 3 ROSS MAGEE, 7 SEETO, 9 LOCKHART

TEAM COACH: STEVE KNIGHT

TEAM MANAGER: CHRISTOPHER CONTI

Scorers: 1-0 18' YUNUSOV(11), 1-1 20' SEETO(7), 1-2 24' ADELI(12), 2-2 26' FAYZULLAEV(5), 3-2 27' IRSALI-EV(2), 4-2 33' YUNUSOV(11), 4-3 35' G. GIOVENALI(4), 5-3 36' SVIRIDOV(18)


Second Referee: MIYATANI NAOKI (JPN)


Time Keeper: MOHAMAD CHAMI (LEB)

Match Commissioner

DAVID DWIGHT (PHI)

Referee Inspector SEYED MOUSAVI (IRN)

P W D L F A GD PTS

CHINA P.R. 1 1 0 0 9 2 7 3

I.R. IRAN 1 1 0 0 7 1 6 3

JAPAN 1 1 0 0 4 0 4 3

UZBEKISTAN 1 1 0 0 5 3 2 3

AUSTRALIA 1 0 0 1 3 5 -2 0

KYRGYZSTAN 1 0 0 1 0 4 -4 0

LEBANON 1 0 0 1 1 7 -6 0

THAILAND 1 0 0 1 2 9 -7 0

34

UZBEKISTAN 2010


35

MATCH DATA

Semi-Final 3rd & 4th Placing Finals

IRAN v. JAPAN 7-0 (2-0)

IRN 10 M. TAHERI, 12 M.NAZARI, 17 M.TAYYBI, 4 M.KESHAVARZ, 9 M. DANESHVAR, 11 M. ZA-HMATKESH, 19 M. NASIRNIA, 3 H. SOLTANI, 5 M.HASHEMZADEH, 6 J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM, 7 A.HASSANZADEH, 8 M.RAEISI



JPN 1 KAWAHARA, 11 TAKAHASHI, 5 MURAKAMI, 6 OSODO, 8 KAMISAWA, 10 KOGURE, 12 FUJIWARA, 16 YOSHIDA, 2 SUGAWARA, 4 KOMIYAMA, 7 MAT-SUMIYA, 9 HOSHI



Scorers: 1-0 1' M. DANESHVAR(9), 2-0 12' M. DANESHVAR(9), 3-0 21' M.TAYYBI(17), 4-0 24' J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM(6), 5-0 27' J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM(6), 6-0 31' J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM(6), 7-0 35' M.KESHAVARZ(4)

Referee: RYAN JOHN SHEPHEARD (AUS)

Second Referee: SCOTT KIDSON (AUS)

Third Referee: REY RITAGA (PHI)


Match Commissioner



CHINA P.R. v. JAPAN 1-6 (0-3)

CHN 1 ZHENG T, 13 HU J, 2 LIANG SH, 3 WANG W, 6 ZHANG XI, 12 LI X, 16 XIA X, 19 CONG L, 20 ZENG Q, 4 HUANG H, 7 ZHANG J, 8 HUANG Q

TEAM COACH GUILHERME CARVALHO FRANCO SILVEIRA

TEAM MANAGER FU YUPEI

JPN 1 KAWAHARA, 11 TAKAHASHI, 5 MURAKAMI, 6 OS-ODO, 8 KAMISAWA, 10 KOGURE, 12 FUJIWARA, 16 YOSHIDA, 18 TAKITA, 4 KOMIYAMA, 7 MATSUMIYA, 9 HOSHI



Scorers: 0-1 4' TAKAHASHI(11), 0-2 15' TAKAHASHI(11), 0-3 16' MURAKAMI(5), 1-3 21' HU J(13), 1-4 24' OSODO(6), 1-5 27' MATSUMIYA(7)



Third Referee: MOHAMMED AL HADDAD (KUW)


Match Commissioner



UZBEKISTAN v. CHINA P.R. 4-3 (2-3)

UZB 1 UMAROV, 11 YUNUSOV, 2 IRSALIEV, 3 ELI-BAEV, 4 TOJIBOEV, 10 AHMEDOV, 13 SAMEGOV, 16 T.BERDIYEV, 18 SVIRIDOV, 5 FAYZULLAEV, 6 SHARIPOV, 7 TAJIBAEV






Scorers: 1-0 2’ YUNUSOV(11), 1-1 4’ LI X(12), 1-2 8’ LI X(12), 1-3 19’ LI X(12), 2-3 19’ SAMEGOV(13), 3-3 24’ ELI-BAEV(3), 4-3 33’ SAMEGOV(13)

Referee: MOHAMMED AL HADDAD (KUW)

Second Referee: NURDIN BUKUEV (KGZ)


Time Keeper: KIM JANG KWAN (KOR)

Match Commissioner



UZBEKISTAN v. IR. IRAN 3-8 (2-3)

UZB 1 UMAROV, 11 YUNUSOV, 2 IRSALIEV, 3 ELI-BAEV, 4 TOJIBOEV, 10 AHMEDOV, 13 SAMEGOV, 16 T.BERDIYEV, 18 SVIRIDOV, 5 FAYZULLAEV, 6 SHARIPOV, 7 TAJIBAEV



IRN 10 M. TAHERI, 12 M.NAZARI, 17 M.TAYYBI, 4 M.KESHAVARZ, 9 M. DANESHVAR, 1 H. ABRAR-INIA, 11 M. ZAHMATKESH, 3 H. SOLTANI, 5 M.HASHEMZADEH, 6 J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM, 7 A.HASSANZADEH, 8 M.RAEISI

TEAM COACH: HOSSEIN SHAMS

TEAM MANAGER: GHAHREMANI KERI BOZORG ASHGAR

Scorers: 1-0 2’ IRSALIEV(2), 2-0 5’ ELIBAEV(3), 2-1 5’ J.ASGHARIMOGHADAM(6), 2-2 12’ M.RAEISI(8), 2-3 19’ M. TAHERI(10), 3-3 22’ ELIBAEV(3), 3-4 22’ M. DANESHVAR(9), 3-5 24’ M.RAEISI(8), 3-6 25’ A.HASSANZADEH(7), 3-7 27’ A.HASSANZADEH(7), 3-8 31’ M. DANESHVAR(9)




Time Keeper: RYAN JOHN SHEPHEARD (AUS)

Match Commissioner



P W D L F A GD PTS

I.R. IRAN 1 1 0 0 7 0 7 3

UZBEKISTAN 1 1 0 0 4 3 1 3

CHINA P.R. 1 0 0 1 3 4 -1 0

JAPAN 1 0 0 1 0 7 -7 0

P W D L F A GD PTS

JAPAN 1 1 0 0 6 1 5 3

CHINA P.R. 1 0 0 1 1 6 -5 0

P W D L F A GD PTS

I.R. IRAN 1 1 0 0 8 3 5 3

UZBEKISTAN 1 0 0 1 3 8 -5 0

36

UZBEKISTAN 2010


37

OFFICIAL AFC AWARDS

Champion (I.R. IRAN)

MVPMOHAMMAD TAHERI (I.R. IRAN)

Best ScorerMOHAMMAD TAHERI (I.R. IRAN)

Fair Play TrophyI.R. IRAN

38

UZBEKISTAN 2010


39

GENERAL STATISTICS

How Goals Were ScoredHow Goals Were Scored

How Goals Were Scored: 1. Set Plays

Set plays 43

Open play 214

Own goal 3

Set Plays

Corners left 8

Corners right 6

Free-kicks (Direct) 6

Following a free-kick 5

Penalties 2

2nd Penalties 7

Following a kick-in 5

Combination Play 52 20.0%

Wing Play - Left side 31 11.9%

Wing Play - Right side 21 8.1%

Solo Effort 70 26.9%

Defensive Error 11 4.2%

Rebound 26 10.0%

Counter Attack. 20 8%

5 Player Attack 4 1.5%

After a corner kick - Left side 8 3.1%

After a corner kick - Right side 6 2.3%

Direct from a free kick 6 2.3%

Following a free kick 5 1.9%

Kick-in 6 2.3%

Own Goal 3 1.2%

Penalty - 6m 2 0.8%

Penalty - 10m 7 2.7%

Total 260

40

UZBEKISTAN 2010


41

GENERAL STATISTICS

How Goals Were Scored: 2. Open Plays

Open Plays

Combinations 52

Counter attack 2

Rebound 26

Wing play left 31

Wing play right 21

Solo effect 70

Defensive errors 11

Power Play 4

When Goals Were Scored

Minute Total

Min 1 - 5 36

Min 6 - 10 27

Min 11-15 24

Min 16 - 20 23

Half Time

Min 21 - 25 40

Min 26 - 30 28

Min 31 - 35 42

Min 36 - 40 40

Extra Time and penalties

Min 41- 45 0

Min 46- 50 0

42

UZBEKISTAN 2010


43

GENERAL STATISTICS

Where Goals Were Scored

Penalty 2

2nd Penalty 7

Inside penalty area 140

Corner of outside penalty area 41

Between penalty and 2nd penalty 48

Between 2nd penaltyand half line 18

From own half 4

44

UZBEKISTAN 2010


45

Tournament Goal ScorersPlayer Country Goals

MOHAMMAD TAHERI I.R. IRAN 12 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 13 (total)

DANESHVAR MASOUD I.R. IRAN 11 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 11 (total)

MOSTAFA TAYYEBI I.R. IRAN 7 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 7 (total)

ZAHMATKESH BAJGIRAN MOHAMMADREZA I.R. IRAN 7 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 7 (total)

ZHANG XI CHINA P.R. 7 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 7 (total)

ELIBAEV NODIR UZBEKISTAN 6 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 6 (total)

ROGIC TOMAS PETAR AUSTRALIA 6 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 6 (total)

THUEANKLANG SUPHAWUT THAILAND 6 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 6 (total)

HASSAN ZADEH NAVLIGHE ALI ASGHAR I.R. IRAN 5 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 5 (total)

JAVAD ASGHARIMOGHADDAM I.R. IRAN 5 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 5 (total)

KAMISAWA TAKANORI JAPAN 5 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 5 (total)

KARRAR MOHSIN MOHAMMED AL THABETI IRAQ 5 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 5 (total)

LI XIN CHINA P.R. 5 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 5 (total)

TAKAHASHI KENSUKE JAPAN 4 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 5 (total)

YUNUSOV ARTUR UZBEKISTAN 5 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 5 (total)

CHALAEMKHET KEATTIYOT THAILAND 4 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 4 (total)

FANG, CHING-JEN CHINESE TAIPEI 4 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 4 (total)

IRSALIEV DILSHOD UZBEKISTAN 4 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 4 (total)

JEONG EUIHYUN KOREA, REPUBLIC 4 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 4 (total)

KASSEM KAWSAN LEBANON 4 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 4 (total)

KIM JEONGNAM KOREA, REPUBLIC 4 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 4 (total)

LIANG SHUANG CHINA P.R. 3 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 4 (total)

AZAMAT MENDIBAEV KYRGYZSTAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

DILSHAT KADYROV KYRGYZSTAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

GREGORY GIOVENALI AUSTRALIA 2 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

HASSAN CHAITO LEBANON 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

HU JIE CHINA P.R. 2 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

ISSARASUWIPAKORN LERTCHAI THAILAND 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

JUMAEV SHERZOD TAJIKISTAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

KHALED TAKAJI LEBANON 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

MATSUMIYA MITSUYOSHI JAPAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

MOHAMMAD KESHAVARZ NASRABADI I.R. IRAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

MURAKAMI TETSUYA JAPAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

MUSTAFA BACHAY HAMZAH IRAQ 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

NGUYEN TRONG THIEN VIETNAM 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

OSODO NOBUYA JAPAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

RAEISI MAJID I.R. IRAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

SAMEGOV FAKHRIDDIN UZBEKISTAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

TRAN HOANG VINH VIETNAM 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

ULMASOV ALISHER TAJIKISTAN 3 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 3 (total)

ABDURAZAKOV GULBEK KYRGYZSTAN 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

ALI HAIDAR INDONESIA 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

HASHEMZADEH MOHAMMAD I.R. IRAN 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

HAYSSAM ATWI LEBANON 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

HOSHI SHOTA JAPAN 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

HUANG HE CHINA P.R. 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

GENERAL STATISTICS

46

UZBEKISTAN 2010


47

GENERAL STATISTICS

Player Country Goals

HUYNH BA TUAN VIETNAM 1 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

JANTA PANUWAT THAILAND 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

KOMIYAMA YUSUKE JAPAN 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

MAKHMUDOV KHURSHED TAJIKISTAN 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

OMAR A A I M ALJASER KUWAIT 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

RAYMOND MILLER AUSTRALIA 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

SVIRIDOV KONSTANTIN UZBEKISTAN 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

TAJIBAEV HURSHID UZBEKISTAN 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

THUSIRI NA-TEE THAILAND 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

WANG WEI CHINA P.R. 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

ZHANG XIAO CHINA P.R. 2 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 2 (total)

ABDULKAREEM AL-SHARSHAHI IRAQ 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

ADMON HANNA ESHO QASHA IRAQ 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

ATAYEV MERGEN TURKMENISTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

BENNY HERA INDONESIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

CHARIYEV ANNABERDY TURKMENISTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

DANNY NGALUAFE AUSTRALIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

DENY HANDOYO INDONESIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

DJETYBAEV NURJAN KYRGYZSTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

ESENMAMEDOV BAYRAMMURAT TURKMENISTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

FATKHULOEV FATKHULLO TAJIKISTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

FOGARTY DANIEL STEVEN AUSTRALIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

HAIRUL INDONESIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

HAMZAH F A H MUHAMMAD KUWAIT 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

HUSSEIN ABD ALI MOHAMMED AL-ZUBAIDI IRAQ 0 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

JAELANI LADJANIBI INDONESIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

JEFRI PURBA INDONESIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

KOGURE KENICHIRO JAPAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

KONDRATKOV VADIM KYRGYZSTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

Player Country Goals

LO, CHIH-AN CHINESE TAIPEI 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

MAKHSUD FAYZULLAEV UZBEKISTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

MUHAMEDMURADOV MEKAN TURKMENISTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

MUHAMMEDOV NURYAGDY TURKMENISTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

NGUYEN HONG GIANG VIETNAM 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

NGUYEN QUOC BAO VIETNAM 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

RAHNAMA ALI I.R. IRAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

SALEM T S A S ALMEKAIMI KUWAIT 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

SALEM Y. S. AMAN KUWAIT 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

SAYAN KARMADI INDONESIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

SEOK DAE SUNG KOREA, REPUBLIC 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

SHERVIN KESHAVARZ ADELI AUSTRALIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

SHIN JONGHOON KOREA, REPUBLIC 0 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

SOCRATES MATULESSY INDONESIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

SURATSAWANG EKAPONG THAILAND 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

TAKITA MANABU JAPAN 0 (G), 1 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

TOBIAS GUANG HUA SEETO AUSTRALIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

TRUONG QUOC TUAN VIETNAM 1 (G), 0 (PK), 1 (Own), 1 (total)

VASIEV DILSHOD TAJIKISTAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

VENNARD VONARZA VICTOR HUTABARAT INDONESIA 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

WANG CHIH-SHENG CHINESE TAIPEI 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

WONGKAEO KRITSADA THAILAND 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

YOSHIDA AKIRA JAPAN 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

ZAMAN MAJID SALIM IRAQ 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

ZHANG JIONG CHINA P.R. 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

ZHENG TAO CHINA P.R. 1 (G), 0 (PK), 0 (Own), 1 (total)

Tournament Goal Scorers Tournament Goal Scorers

48

UZBEKISTAN 2010


49

Tournament Report : Spectators

Date Fixture Group Venue Spectators Capacity %

30-May-10 UZBEKISTAN vs I.R. IRAN Final Uzbekistan Sports Complex 3,500 2,600 135%

24-May-10 INDONESIA vs UZBEKISTAN Group A Uzbekistan Sports Complex 3,000 2,600 115%

25-May-10 UZBEKISTAN vs CHINESE TAIPEI Group A Uzbekistan Sports Complex 3,000 2,600 115%

27-May-10 UZBEKISTAN vs AUSTRALIA Quarter Finals Uzbekistan Sports Complex 3,000 2,600 115%

28-May-10 UZBEKISTAN vs CHINA P.R. Semi Finals Uzbekistan Sports Complex 2,500 2,600 96%

28-May-10 I.R. IRAN vs JAPAN Semi Finals Uzbekistan Sports Complex 1,500 2,600 58%

30-May-10 CHINA P.R. vs JAPAN 3rd/4th Placing Uzbekistan Sports Complex 1,500 2,600 58%

23-May-10 UZBEKISTAN vs LEBANON Group A Uzbekistan Sports Complex 1,200 2,600 46%

24-May-10 AUSTRALIA vs I.R. IRAN Group B Uzbekistan Sports Complex 650 2,600 25%

27-May-10 I.R. IRAN vs LEBANON Quarter Finals Uzbekistan Sports Complex 550 2,600 21%

23-May-10 THAILAND vs KYRGYZSTAN Group C IT University Com-plex 500 400 125%

23-May-10 JAPAN vs CHINA P.R. Group D IT University Com-plex 500 400 125%

23-May-10 VIETNAM vs KOREA REPUBLIC Group C IT University Com-plex 500 400 125%

24-May-10 KYRGYZSTAN vs VIETNAM Group C IT University Com-plex 500 400 125%

24-May-10 KOREA REPUBLIC vs THAILAND Group C IT University Com-plex 400 400 100%

25-May-10 JAPAN vs TURKMENISTAN Group D Uzbekistan Sports Complex 400 2,600 15%

25-May-10 I.R. IRAN vs KUWAIT Group B Uzbekistan Sports Complex 400 2,600 15%

27-May-10 JAPAN vs KYRGYZSTAN Quarter Finals Uzbekistan Sports Complex 400 2,600 15%

23-May-10 TURKMENISTAN vs IRAQ Group D IT University Com-plex 350 400 88%

27-May-10 THAILAND vs CHINA P.R. Quarter Finals Uzbekistan Sports Complex 300 2,600 12%

23-May-10 KUWAIT vs AUSTRALIA Group B Uzbekistan Sports Complex 250 2,600 10%

23-May-10 CHINESE TAIPEI vs INDONESIA Group A Uzbekistan Sports Complex 250 2,600 10%

24-May-10 TAJIKISTAN vs KUWAIT Group B Uzbekistan Sports Complex 250 2,600 10%

24-May-10 CHINA P.R. vs TURKMENISTAN Group D IT University Com-plex 250 400 63%

25-May-10 IRAQ vs CHINA P.R. Group D IT University Com-plex 250 400 63%

GENERAL STATISTICS

Date Fixture Group Venue Spectators Capacity %

25-May-10 AUSTRALIA vs TAJIKISTAN Group B IT University Com-plex 250 400 63%

25-May-10 INDONESIA vs LEBANON Group A IT University Com-plex 250 400 63%

25-May-10 THAILAND vs VIETNAM Group C Uzbekistan Sports Complex 200 2,600 8%

23-May-10 I.R. IRAN vs TAJIKISTAN Group B Uzbekistan Sports Complex 150 2,600 6%

24-May-10 LEBANON vs CHINESE TAIPEI Group A Uzbekistan Sports Complex 150 2,600 6%

24-May-10 IRAQ vs JAPAN Group D IT University Com-plex 150 400 38%

25-May-10 KOREA REPUBLIC vs KYRGYZSTAN Group C IT University Com-plex 150 400 38%

Total Attendance: 27,200

50

UZBEKISTAN 2010


51

GENERAL STATISTICS

Fair Play Report Tournament Team Disciplinary Report

Team Total

I.R. IRAN 52.03

UZBEKISTAN 50.67

JAPAN 48.12

CHINA P.R. 47.47

AUSTRALIA 36.02

LEBANON 35.75

KYRGYZSTAN 34.21

THAILAND 33.14

KOREA REPUBLIC 27.04

TAJIKISTAN 26.64

INDONESIA 25.75

CHINESE TAIPEI 25.75

VIETNAM 25.5

KUWAIT 24.46

IRAQ 24.25

TURKMENISTAN 23.1

Team Yellow Cards Red Cards (second yellow) Red Cards

AUSTRALIA 5 1 -

CHINA P.R. 9 - 1

CHINESE TAIPEI 4 - -

I.R. IRAN 5 - -

INDONESIA 6 - -

IRAQ 3 - 1

JAPAN 7 - -

KOREA REPUBLIC 3 - -

KUWAIT 5 - -

KYRGYZSTAN 5 - -

LEBANON 3 - 1

TAJIKISTAN 3 - -

THAILAND 5 - 1

TURKMENISTAN 7 1 -

UZBEKISTAN 7 - -

VIETNAM 8 1 -

Total 85 3 4

52

UZBEKISTAN 2010


53

REFEREE AND ASSISTANT REFEREES

Name Country Designation

RYAN JOHN SHEPHEARD AUSTRALIA FUTSAL Referee

ISOKAWA KAZUYA JAPAN FUTSAL Referee

KRUTSRI PRASERT THAILAND FUTSAL Referee

COLLEY CHRISTOPHER DANIEL AUSTRALIA FUTSAL Referee

BUKUEV NURDIN KYRGYZSTAN FUTSAL Referee

KIM JANG KWAN KOREA, REPUBLIC FUTSAL Referee

ALI REZA SOHRABI BALSINI I.R. IRAN FUTSAL Referee

HUSEIN MAHMOUD HUSEIN KHALAILEH JORDAN FUTSAL Referee

KIDSON SCOTT BRADLEY AUSTRALIA FUTSAL Referee

BARATOV VADIM TURKMENISTAN FUTSAL Referee

VAHID ARZPEYMA MOHAMAREH I.R. IRAN FUTSAL Referee

RITAGA REY MARTINEZ PHILIPPINES FUTSAL Referee

ABDULRAHMAN ABDULQADER ABDULRAHMAN ABDULLA BAHRAIN FUTSAL Referee

MOHAMMAD Y A M ALHADDAD KUWAIT FUTSAL Referee

MOHAMAD CHAMI LEBANON FUTSAL Referee

MIYATANI NAOKI JAPAN FUTSAL Referee

54

UZBEKISTAN 2010


55

PRELIMINARY COMPETITIONS

Qualification ASEAN Qualification South & Central

Qualification WestQualification East

No. Date Time Team A Score Team B Group

1 20 Feb,10 14:30:00 AUSTRALIA 6-1 (5-1) MYANMAR Group A

2 20 Feb,10 16:15:00 MALAYSIA 4-1 (1-0) PHILIPPINES Group B

3 20 Feb,10 18:30:00 VIETNAM 12-2 (5-1) CAMBODIA Group B

4 21 Feb,10 14:30:00 MYANMAR 1-7 (0-3) INDONESIA Group A

5 21 Feb,10 16:15:00 PHILIPPINES 1-4 (0-1) VIETNAM Group B

6 21 Feb,10 18:30:00 CAMBODIA 1-13 (0-4) MALAYSIA Group B

7 22 Feb,10 14:30:00 AUSTRALIA 4-1 (2-1) INDONESIA Group A

8 22 Feb,10 16:15:00 MALAYSIA 2-2 (0-2) VIETNAM Group B

9 22 Feb,10 18:30:00 CAMBODIA 4-8 (3-3) PHILIPPINES Group B

10 24 Feb,10 16:15:00 MALAYSIA 3-5 (1-0) INDONESIA Semi Finals

11 24 Feb,10 18:30:00 AUSTRALIA 4-1 (2-0) VIETNAM Semi Finals

12 25 Feb,10 16:15:00 MALAYSIA 3-6 a.e.t. (3-3,2-2) VIETNAM 3rd/4th Placing

13 25 Feb,10 18:30:00 INDONESIA 0-3 (0-1) AUSTRALIA Final

QUALIFIED : AUSTRALIA, INDONESIA and VIETNAM


1 10 Nov,09 12:00:00 KYRGYZSTAN 8-3 (3-3) AFGHANISTAN Group A

2 10 Nov,09 14:30:00 TURKMENISTAN 3-7 (2-3) TAJIKISTAN Group A

3 11 Nov,09 12:00:00 AFGHANISTAN 0-2 (0-0) TURKMENISTAN Group A

4 11 Nov,09 14:30:00 TAJIKISTAN 2-3 (0-2) KYRGYZSTAN Group A

5 12 Nov,09 12:00:00 KYRGYZSTAN 2-2 (1-2) TURKMENISTAN Group A

6 12 Nov,09 14:30:00 TAJIKISTAN 10-2 (4-1) AFGHANISTAN Group A

QUALIFIED : TAJIKISTAN, TURKMENISTAN and KYRGSZSTAN


1 13 Oct,09 17:00:00 JORDAN 2-6 (0-3) IRAQ Group B

2 13 Oct,09 19:15:00 BAHRAIN 4-4 (3-1) LEBANON Group A

3 14 Oct,09 17:00:00 KUWAIT 1-2 (0-1) JORDAN Group B

4 14 Oct,09 19:15:00 QATAR 4-3 (1-0) BAHRAIN Group A

5 15 Oct,09 17:00:00 IRAQ 1-2 (1-0) KUWAIT Group B

6 15 Oct,09 19:15:00 LEBANON 8-3 (2-2) QATAR Group A

7 17 Oct,09 17:00:00 IRAQ 4-0 (0-0) QATAR Semi Finals

8 17 Oct,09 19:30:00 LEBANON 1-0 (0-0) KUWAIT Semi Finals

9 18 Oct,09 17:00:00 KUWAIT 13-9 a.e.t. (7-7,4-1) QATAR 3rd/4th Placing

10 18 Oct,09 19:30:00 LEBANON 3-1 (0-0) IRAQ Final

QUALIFIED : LEBANON, IRAQ and KUWAIT


1 24 Nov,09 14:00:00 JAPAN 10-1 (6-0) MACAU Group A

2 24 Nov,09 16:20:00 CHINESE TAIPEI 2-1 (0-1) HONG KONG Group A

3 24 Nov,09 19:45:00 GUAM 0-23 (0-8) CHINA P.R. Group B

4 25 Nov,09 14:00:00 MACAU 5-9 (3-2) CHINESE TAIPEI Group A

5 25 Nov,09 16:20:00 KOREA REPUBLIC 26-1 (10-0) GUAM Group B

6 25 Nov,09 19:45:00 HONG KONG 0-8 (0-5) JAPAN Group A

7 26 Nov,09 14:00:00 JAPAN 4-2 (2-1) CHINESE TAIPEI Group A

8 26 Nov,09 16:20:00 HONG KONG 9-1 (4-0) MACAU Group A

9 26 Nov,09 19:45:00 CHINA P.R. 5-4 (4-3) KOREA REPUBLIC Group B

10 28 Nov,09 14:00:00 MACAU 8-2 (3-1) GUAM Semi Finals

11 28 Nov,09 16:30:00 CHINA P.R. 5-1 (1-0) CHINESE TAIPEI Semi Finals

12 28 Nov,09 19:45:00 JAPAN 6-1 (4-0) KOREA REPUBLIC Semi Finals

13 29 Nov,09 10:00:00 HONG KONG 11-2 (5-0) GUAM Semi Finals

14 29 Nov,09 14:00:00 CHINESE TAIPEI 7-6 (3-2) KOREA REPUBLIC 3rd/4th Placing

15 29 Nov,09 16:30:00 CHINA P.R. 5-4 (1-3) JAPAN Final

QUALIFIED : CHINA, JAPAN, KOREA REPUBLIC and CHINESE TAIPEI

56

UZBEKISTAN 2010


57

TEAM DATA AND ANALYSIS

I.R. IRAN Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Iran vs. Tajikistan 19 : 2 (8-0)24 May 2010 Iran vs. Australia 9 : 3 (3-3)25 May 2010 Iran vs. Kuwait 7 : 0 (2-0) Quarter Final27 May 2010 Iran vs. Lebanon 7 : 1 (4-1)

Semi-Final28 May 2010 Iran vs. Japan 7 : 0 (2-0)

Final 30 May 2010 Iran vs. Uzbekistan 8 : 3 (3-2)

TEAM DATA:

Average Age 27 yrs old Disciplinary Record: Yellow cards 5Red cards (indirect) 0Red cards (direct) 0

Statistics and Team Data

Team: I.R.IRAN Attacking DefendingSanctions

No PlayerMinutes Played Shots Passes Field

Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5

Match6 Total Score Saved Post Out Assist Miss IP DP CS NCS DO YC 2YC RC

1 ABRARINIA AMIDREZA (GK) 20 - 1 - - - 21

3 SOLTANI HOSSEIN 16 13 18 15 7 16 85 9 2 12 2 11 2 1 1

4 MOHAMMAD KESHA-VARZ NASRABADI 19 18 23 23 27 28 138 3 10 10 7 10 19 6

5 HASHEMZADEH MOHAMMAD 16 14 13 11 9 7 70 2 2 3 3 1 6 4 1 1

6 JAVAD ASGHARIMOGHDAM 11 11 15 14 18 20 89 5 8 4 7 3 10 9 8

7HASSAN ZADEH NAVLIGHE ALI ASGHAR

10 - - - 9 19 38 5 1 1 3 1

8 RAEISI MAJID 14 11 13 7 - 10 55 3 6 12 6 3 3

9 MASOUD DANESHVAR 20 22 17 21 23 14 117 11 14 1 16 3 6 9 12

10 MOHAMMAD TAHERI 17 21 21 23 28 25 135 13 25 5 16 2 11 11 7 1

11ZAHMATKESH BAJGIRAN MOHAMMADREZA

14 20 15 22 7 12 90 7 2 1 14 15 6 5

12 MOSTAFA NAZARI (GK) 20 40 - 40 40 40 180 8 1 22 8 18

17 MOSTAFA TAYYEBI 19 23 17 23 27 12 121 7 6 1 13 2 7 10 5 1

18 RAHNAMA ALI - 3 8 10 - - 21 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1

19 NASIRNIAIEFAROUJI MOJTABA (GK) - - 39 - - - 39 4 2 4

Legends:IP: Intercepted Pass- DP: Dispossessed Opponent- CS: Completed Save- NCS: Non Completed Save- DO: Deflected Out of the pitch

Goal Scorers:

MOHAMMAD TAHERI 13 DANESHVAR MASOUD 11MOSTAFA TAYYEBI 7ZAHMATKESH BAJGIRAN MOHAMMADREZA 7HASSAN ZADEH NAVLIGHE ALI ASGHAR 5JAVAD ASGHARIMOGHADDAM 5MOHAMMAD KESHAVARZ NASRABADI 3RAEISI MAJID 3HASHEMZADEH MOHAMMAD 2RAHNAMA ALI 1

Outstanding Players:

• No 12: GK, Mostafa Nazari – Calm, stable and good in long throw

• No 4: M. Keshavarz Nasrabadi – Calm, good positioning in defend

• No 9: Daneshvar Masoud – Good at shielding the ball and able to score with both feet

• No 10: Mohammad Taheri – Versatile player. Good at both attack and defend

Key Points:

• Formation alternating between 4-0 and 3-1 • Good individually and as a team• Most players are able to attack and defend• Outstanding physical ability• Showed very attractive combination plays• Players are aggressive, skillful and willing to fight• Quick transfer between defense and offense• Good finishing ability• Press as a unit• Strong mentality

System/Formation:

Alternating between 4-0 and 3-1 and flexible

Style of Play:

They played aggressively in every game and would normally move to upper court to give pressure to opposite team to try and win ball possession quickly. React quickly between Offense and Defense. Their players were skillful and worked as a unit very well. Their finishing ability is outstanding too.

Goal scored: 57Goal conceded: 9

Coach:

Coach: Hossein Shams (IRAN) Day of birth: 6 April 1961

Coaching Qualification: AFC A Licence AFC and FIFA Futsal international instructor

Career as a Coach:1999-2001 Iran Futsal National team 2002 Bahrain Futsal National team 2003-2005 Kuwait Futsal National team 2006-present Iran Futsal National team

Technical:

All of their players were skillful. Good at both feet and able to score goals.

Their passing and controlling ability were outstanding.

Tactics:-

Defensive – Zonal defense plus combination with man mark. They pushed up to press immediately right after losing ball possession and also in most games which made it difficult for their opponents to build up.

Offensive – Basic form is 4-0 but change to 3-1 suddenly and smoothly. Players kept moving fluently during the rotation with plenty of variations. It made opposite teams difficult to react properly. They were able to stop the ball in front of the “D” and support quickly from behind. Physical condition

High fitness level. Most of their players were quick, agile and have ideal anaerobic capacity.

Mental aspect

They have strong mentality and were able to overcome difficult situations. They also have self believe and full of confidence but at times, over confident.

Group B Final Ranking: Champion

58

UZBEKISTAN 2010


59


UZBEKISTAN Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Uzbekistan vs. Lebanon 3:1 (2-0)24 May 2010 Uzbekistan vs. Indonesia 4:2 (1-0)25 May 2010 Uzbekistan vs. Chinese Taipei 4:1 (1-0)

Quarter Final27 May 2010 Uzbekistan vs. Australia 5:3 (1-1)

Semi-Final28 May 2010 Uzbekistan vs. China 4:3 (2-3)

Final 30 May 2010 Uzbekistan vs. Iran 3:8 (2-3)

TEAM DATA:

Average Age 25.8 yrs old Disciplinary Record: Yellow cards 7Red cards (indirect) 0Red cards (direct) 0


Team: Uzbekistan Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 UMAROV RUSTAM (GK) 40 39 - 40 40 35 194 5 15 6 10

2 IRSALIEV DILSHOD 24 16 - 22 21 17 100 4 2 1 8 1 13 10 4 1

3 ELIBAEV NODIR 26 24 20 27 21 23 141 6 4 1 17 12 12 2 2

4 TOJIBOEV SHUHRAT 24 18 23 20 24 33 142 6 1 5 3 16 18 10

5 MAKHSUD FAYZULLAEV 17 23 17 15 19 20 111 1 4 1 3 12 8 2 1

6 SHARIPOV JAMOLIDDIN 10 6 11 6 9 - 42 2 1 1 1 10 5 2

7 TAJIBAEV HURSHID 12 15 20 18 17 11 93 2 2 1 1 3 12 4 6

10 AHMEDOV BAHODIR - 9 20 23 21 11 84 3 1 5 2 13 6 3

11 YUNUSOV ARTUR 20 21 15 15 17 18 106 5 4 8 14 10 9 2

12 KRAVCHENKO NIKOLAY (GK) - - - - - - -

13 SAMEGOV FAKHRIDDIN 11 16 9 4 12 9 61 3 3 2 14 9 5 5

16 BERDIYEV TUYCHIBOY(GK) - - 38 - - - 38 1 6 2

18 SVIRIDOV KONSTANTIN 11 14 19 21 21 18 104 2 4 1 13 10 6 1

19 BERDIEV SUKHROB 6 - 8 - - - 14 1 1


Goal Scorers:

ELIBAEV NODIR 6YUNUSOV ARTUR 5IRSALIEV DILSHOD 4SAMEGOV FAKHRIDDIN 3 SVIRIDOV KONSTANTIN 2 TAJIBAEV HURSHID 2MAKHSUD FAYZULLAEV 1


• No 1: Umarov Rustam – GK, Stable, good in long throws• No 11: Yunusov Artur – Agile, skillful and good with both feet• No 13: Samegov Fakhriddin – Powerful left foot

Key Points:

• Formation: Alternate between 4-0 and 3-1• Quite skillful individuals • Plenty of good moves in rotation• Try to find the pivot suddenly while rotating• Playing aggressively and confidently in front of home

supporters• Much improved under the new coach in terms of attack and

defend as a team• Some effective long passes• Using #13 in the Power Play and taking free kicks• Needs to improve the combination play

System/Formation:

Alternating between 4-0 and 3-1


Coach:

Coach: SERGIO AGUIARGUIMARAES FILHO (Brazil)

Day of birth: 17 February 1958

Coaching Qualification: Cref. Consello Regional Esucacao Fisica Abtf. Associacao Brasileira De Treinasores De Futebol - FIFA

Career as a CoachInternational Coaching:2003-2008: Japan National Futsal Team2009-present: Uzbekistan National Futsal Team

Club Coaching:Dinamo Yamal – Russia Bradesco Esporte Clube – Brasil Fulminense Futebol Clube – Brazil Grajau Tenis Clube - Brazil

Style of Play:

Start with 4-0 normally but change to 3-1 suddenly trying to find the Pivot. But their combination plays were not good enough although they have quite skillful individuals. Their physical condition was quite good and as a result they were able to press in the upper court and launch the counter attack quickly. Technical:

Players are skillful averagely. #11 is good with both feet and #13 have a powerful left foot. However, the passing was not so accurate.

Tactics:-

Defensive – Zonal defense mainly. Sometimes start defending from the half-way line and sometimes press in the upper field then change to man to man marking.

Offensive – Normally play aggressively or it could be because they are in their home ground. Plenty of rotations but variations were insufficient. Their basic form was 4-0 but may suddenly change to 3-1 and look for the Pivot. Physical condition

The physical condition of their players was quite good. That is the reason why they were able to press in the upper court. Most of their players are agile and quick.

Mental aspect

They played aggressively and confidently because of home ground advantage. They were fearless and fought hard in every game.

Group A Final Ranking: 2nd PLACE

60

UZBEKISTAN 2010


61


JAPAN Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Japan vs. China 5:1 (3-0)24 May 2010 Japan vs. Iraq 10:1 (3-1)25 May 2010 Japan vs. Turkmenistan 1:0 (1-0) Quarter Final27 May 2010 Japan vs. Kyrgyzstan 4:0 (2-0)

Semi-Final28 May 2010 Japan vs Iran 0:7 (0-2)

3rd/4th Place30 May 2010 Japan vs China P.R 5:1(3-0)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Japan Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 KAWAHARA HISAMITSU(GK) 40 31 40 40 33 40 224 16 9 28

2 SUGAWARA KAZU-NORI 4 14 9 23 25 - 75 1

4 KOMIYAMA YUSUKE 13 - 8 15 16 14 66 3 3 2 1 5 7 2

5 MURAKAMI TETSUYA 24 13 22 22 25 20 126 5 22 14 2 6 7 6

6 OSODO NOBUYA 14 21 - 22 23 22 102 3 8 5 13 3 15 5 6 2

7 MATSUMIYA MITSUYOSHI 12 14 16 9 9 17 77 4 2 5 5 14 5 7 2

8 KAMISAWA TAKANORI 24 19 22 27 24 21 137 6 7 2 8 2 8 11 8

9 HOSHI SHOTA 15 13 15 11 20 17 91 4 18 2 8 8 7 7 10 1

10 KOGURE KEN-ICHIRO 19 14 22 27 21 19 122 1 5 8 4 11 4

11 AKAHASHI KENSUKE 14 24 26 24 24 18 130 6 6 12 8 7 12 1

12 FUJIWARA (GK) - 9 - - - - 9

14 FUKIMBARA TORU (GK) - - - - - - -

16 YOSHIDA AKIRA 12 16 11 2 4 7 42 1 6 1 4 1 5 6 4 1

18 TAKITA MANABU 0 12 9 - - 2 23 1 1 2


Goal Scorers:

TAKAHASHI KENSUKE 5KAMISAWA TAKANORI 4MATSUMIYA MITSUYOSHI 3OSODO NOBUYA 3 MURAKAMI TETSUYA 3KOMIYAMA YUSUKE 2HOSHI SHOTA 2TAKITA MANABU 1KOGURE KENICHIRO 1YOSHIDA AKIRA 1


• No 8 KAMISAWA TAKANORI – very athletic, technically strong skilful dribbler and creative player

• No 11 AKAHASHI KENSUKE – skilful dribbler and creative left wing attacker

• No 10 KOGURE KENICHIRO -- professional player and leader and very skillful

Key Points: • Formation varies 4-0/3-1• Efficient and compact defending• Excellent tactical awareness• Excellent use of wide areas• Aggressive and skillful dribblers in No. 11 , No. 8 and No. 6• Quick transfer from defense to offence by solo runs

System/Formation:

Flexible 1.3.1 or 1.4.0 or 1.2.2 etc

Style of Play:

They always played aggressively in every game and would normally move to upper court to give pressure to their opponents and try to win ball possession. React quickly between Offence and Defense. Their players were skillful and worked as a team very well. Their finishing ability is very good too.


Coach:

Coach: Miguel Jose Rodrigo (SPAIN) Date of birth: 15 July 1970

Coaching Qualification:Instructor Technical – Tactical course :level 1,2,3 (R.F.E.F)Level 3 master in Spain (R.F.E.F) Collaborator FIFA courses

Career as a Coach:Padova patrarca Serie A ITALY (3 seasons) Luparese Padova Seria A ITALY (2 seasons) Dinamo Moscow Super league RUSSIA (1 Season) Japan National Team Head Coach (1 +3 Seasons) Nazareno das Hermanas Jaen Paraiso Jnterior

Technical:

Very skillful players that can perform any tactic or system of play efficiently and physically fit to do any technical move

Tactics:-

Depend heavily on tactical strategies in defense or in offense or even in free kicks or in kicks

Defensive – They adopted group play and depended mainly on tactical strategies combined with strong and effective defense by defending with 1.4.0 and change to 1.3.1 or 1.1.3

Offensive – They attacked mostly from the wings with fast passes and movements without the ball to create space with skillful dribblers which can make a difference and are dependable during preparation to score as they possessed very strong shooters Physical condition

One of the fittest team and well prepared for the tournament

Mental aspect

They were mentally strong and focused in all matches, knowing what they want and what to do, except the match against Iran whereby they were unable to play as they usually did with other opponents and lost the game

Group D Final Ranking: 3rd Place

62

UZBEKISTAN 2010


63


CHINA Group Matches:

23 May 2010 China P.R. vs. Japan 1:5 (0-3)24 May 2010 China P.R. vs. Turkmenistan 6:2 (4-2)25 May 2010 China P.R. vs. Iraq 7:6 (2-0)

Quarter Final27 May 2010 China vs. Thailand 9:2 (4-1)

Semi Final28 May 2010 China vs. Uzbekistan 3:4 (3-2)

3rd/4th Place30 May 2010 China vs Japan 1:6 (0-3)

TEAM DATA:



Team: China Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 ZHENG TAO (GK) 40 40 40 38 32 32 222 1 1 7 28 22 39

2 LIANG SHUANG 23 26 18 26 28 17 138 4 9 2 16 1 25 21 3 1 1

3 WANG WEI 18 23 - 22 33 30 126 2 7 2 15 3 20 6 2 2

4 HUANG HE 16 12 17 17 16 14 92 2 3 7 12 5 2 1

6 ZHANG XI 21 30 17 24 25 27 144 7 13 4 10 1 22 10 5

7 ZHANG JIONG 13 9 17 6 21 11 77 1 5 1 10 8 3 3

8 HUANG ZHENGQI - - - - 2 5 7 1

9 ZHANG XIAO 22 26 20 19 - - 87 2 7 14 1 18 12 3 2

11 WANG TIANYI - - - - - - - -

12 LI XIN 17 15 23 26 30 29 140 5 7 1 9 4 27 15 2

13 HU JIE 24 24 24 27 20 20 139 3 4 4 1 17 6 1 1

16 XIA XUN - - 12 2 10 6 30 2 3 1

19 CONG LIN - - - 2 10 9 21 1 2 2

20 ZENG QIAN (GK) - - - 3 - - 3 1


Goal Scorers:

ZHENG XI 7LI XIN 5LIANG SHUANG 4HU JIE 3HUANG HE 2WANG WEI 2ZHANG XIAO 2ZHANG JIONG 1ZHENG TAO 1


• No 2 LIANG SHUANG – very athletic, technically strong and good composure and a leader

• No 6 ZHANG XI – creative, skilful dribbler and scorer • No 13 HU JIE – skilful dribbler and creative with great

passing skills

Key Points:

• Formation: Alternating between 1-2-1 and 3-1 and 1-3• Quite skillful individuals • Plenty of good moves in rotation• Try to find the space while rotating• Playing aggressively and Confidently • Improved a lot after afew game in attack and defend as a

team• Some effective long passes• Using No.13 in the Power Play • Need to improve their self confidence

System/Formation:

Flexible 1-2-1 and 3-1 and 1-3

Style of Play:

They play diamond formation most of the time in defense and


Coach:

Coach: Guilherme Carvalho Franco Da Silveira (Brazil) Date of birth: 7 April 1964

Coaching Qualification: Master Degree in Physical Education (Federal University of MG) Degree in Physical Education (Federal University of MG)

Career as a Coach:International Coaching:2007 – 2010 China Futsal National Team 2004 China Futsal National Team 1999 – 2000 Australian Youth Team, Centre of Excellence in BrazilClub Coaching:2003 -2004 Chendu Laimei (Chinese Futsal League)1995 – 1996 Nirasaki High School U18 Soccer Team (Japan)1985 – 1995 Arsenal Esporte Clube in Brazil (Futsal for U11 – U18 and 1st Division)

performed it very well and closed the area by moving together without losing the shape of the team and changing to other formations according to the opponent attacking strategies. They attack through the wings. Technical:

Players are skillful on the average. No.2 is good with both feet and No.6 have a powerful and skillful left foot.The accuracy of passing was very good and the movements were great but lacked confidence.

Tactics:-

Defensive – They are the few teams that played diamond defense and covered the area with tactical moves without losing the shape of the team and they move together cohesively and changed very fast to other formation where necessary.

Offensive – They played with good attacking tactics via the wings to break the opponent’s defense and sent fast passes to the penalty area or by skillful moves from player No.6 to create a space for the player to strike from behind to aim for the goal. Physical condition

They were in very good physical condition and were well prepared with young players doing as told exactly and perfectly

Mental aspect

They were well prepared on the mental aspect and it was clearly shown in their matches except the last match with Japan where their players entered the game unprepared mentally to win so they lost badly.

Group D Final Ranking: 4th Place

64

UZBEKISTAN 2010


65


AUSTRALIA Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Australia vs. Kuwait 4:2 (2-1)24 May 2010 Australia vs. Iran 3:9 (3-3)25 May 2010 Australia vs. Tajikistan 5:4 (2-2)

Quarter Final

27 May 2010 Australia vs. Uzbekistan 3:5 (1-1)

TEAM DATA:

Average Age 23 yrs old

Disciplinary Record: Yellow cards 5Red cards (indirect) 1Red cards (direct) 0


Team: Australia Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 KONSTANTINOU ANGELO(GK) - - - 7 7 2 2 1 1

2 SPATHIS PETER(GK) 20 40 40 33 133 1 9 1 23 17 19

3 ROSS-MAGEE PATRICK ALAN - 3 - - 3 3 2

4 GIOVENALI GRE-GORY JAMES 26 27 29 35 117 3 3 3 15 1 24 16 19 1

5 KEITH SIMON ROBERT 15 16 11 42 2 1 2 1 10 3 3 2 1

6 MARK LESLIE SYM-INGTON - - - - -

7 SEETO TOBIAS GUANG HUA 24 26 31 19 100 1 9 4 1 19 13 10

9 LOCKHART DEAN EDWARD 7 5 7 8 27 2 2 2 1 2 1

11 NGALUAFE DANNY HENRY TALI-TAUFA 21 17 21 15 74 1 1 5 2 13 8 3 1

12 KESHAVARZ ADELI SHERVIN - 10 9 9 28 1 2 5 2 2

13 ROGIC TOMAS PETAR 24 19 18 25 86 6 6 1 5 5 21 7 2

14 FOGARTY DANIEL STEVEN 24 25 14 25 88 1 6 7 3 12 8 3 1

15 RAYMOND CHARLES MILLER - 11 16 17 44 2 2 5 4 7 5 5

17 IAN RHYS MCAN-DREW 18 - - 5 23 2 1 1 1


Goal Scorers:

ROGIC TOMAS PETAR 6GIOVENALI GREGORY JAMES 3RAYMOND CHARLES MILLER 2 FOGARTY DANIEL STEVEN 1SEETO TOBIAS GUANG HUA 1KESHAVARZ ADELI SHERVIN 1NGALUAFE DANNY HENRY TALI-TAUFA 1


• No 13: Rogic Tomas Petar – Strong in both feet and able to protect the ball well

• No 14: Fogarty Daniel Steven – Speedy and always on the move.

Key Points:

• Basic formation 1-2-1 but may change to 2-2 in some occasions

• Very disciplined team• Strong mentality and never say die• Physically fit and strong in 1 v 1 duel • Quick in launching the counter attack• Quick recovery after losing ball possession• Work quite well as a team• Play “Simple” – plenty of long balls to the target player (No.

13)• Quick support from behind• Man to man marking mainly in defense but not good in

blocking the passing line

System/Formation:

Basic form is 1-2-1 but may change to 2-2

Style of Play:

They played simply and directly as they were not very good in


Coach:

Coach: Steven Knight (Australian)

Day of birth: 8 March 1963

Coaching Qualification:AFC “B” Licence Certificate FFA Futsal Level 1 and Level 2

Career as a Coach:International Coaching:2009 – present: Australian Futsal National Team Head Coach2008: Australian Futsal National Team Asst. Coach1991: Australian Futsal National Team Asst. Coach

Club Coaching:2009-2010: Macabi Man/Youth Teams Head Coach2006-09: Northern Beaches Academy/Youth and Men Head Coach1986-90: Sydney Tornadoes Head Coach building up from behind. Most of the time, they used plenty of

long balls to their target player around the “D” and supporting quickly from behind. They rely on man to man marking in their own half and look for quick counter attacks after winning ball possession. Technical:

A number of their players were quite skillful like No. 11, No. 13 and No. 14, but the majority of their players were not skillful enough to build up the attack from behind.

Tactics:-

Defensive – They stayed in their own half to defend normally but will push up to press when possible. Man to man marking is their basic defensive philosophy.

Offensive – Alternating between 2-2 and 1-2-1. They would launch quick counter-attack right after winning ball possession. However, they also play long balls to their target player around the “D” and supporting quickly from behind. Physical condition

Most of their players were physically strong and able to move up and down the court with ease..

Mental aspect

Strong mentality, willing to fight and have “Never Say Die” attitude. It made them a team that is others do not like to play with.

Group B Final Ranking: 5th PLACE

66

UZBEKISTAN 2010


67


KYRGYZSTAN Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Kyrgyzstan vs. Thailand 2:4 (2-1)24 May 2010 Kyrgyzstan vs. Vietnam 4:2 (2-0)25 May 2010 Kyrgyzstan vs. Korea Republic 4:4 (2-1)

Quarter Final27 May 2010 Kyrgyzstan vs. Japan 0:4 (0-2)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Kyrgyzstan Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 ERMOLOV KIRILL(GK) 37 38 40 36 151 32 19 17

4 KADYROV DILSHAT 27 27 27 29 110 3 14 10 2 11 6 1

5 KASIMOV ZAKIR 22 20 17 21 80 5 1 2 3 6 1 1

7 DJETYBAEV NURJAN 31 27 26 31 115 1 13 1 6 5 27 7 5

8 ABDURAZAKOV GULBEK - 12 10 2 22 2 1 5 2 1

9 TILEKEEV ABEK 23 23 26 29 101 4 1 6 4 2 1

11 KONDRATKOV VADIM 14 - 4 12 30 1 2 2 1

14 ASKARBEK UULU - - - - -

15 MENDIBAEV AZAMAT 24 23 23 26 96 3 1 8 1 8 5 2

16 ZUBAREV VITALII - - - - -

17 KANETOV EMIL 18 17 12 18 65 2 6 1 10 3 6 1

18 TABALDIEV ERKIN 8 15 11 4 38 3 3 1 8 4 1 1


Goal Scorers:

Dilshat Kadyrov 3Azamat Mendibaev 2Abdurazakov Gulbek 2Djetybaev Nurjan 1Kondratkov Vadim 1Abek Tilekeev 1


• No 7 Djetybaev Nurjan – very athletic, technically strong and good leader

• No 4 Dilshat Kadyrov – skilful dribbler and very good attacker

Key Points:

• Formation varies 1-2-1/2-2/3-1• Efficient and compact defending• Excellent tactical awareness• Excellent use of wing areas• Aggressive, skilful dribblers • Quick transfer from defense to offence

System/Formation:

Flexible 1.1.2.1 or 1.3.1 or etc

Style of Play:

They played the diamond formation most of the time in defense and performed it very well and closed the area by moving together without losing the shape of the team and changing to other formations according to the opponent attacking strategies then attack depending on the wings Technical:

Players are skillful averagely. No.7 is good in both feet and No.4 have a powerful and skillful with his left foot.The accuracy of passing was very good but lack experience.


Coach:

Coach: Amirzhan Mukanov (KASAKHSTAN)

Day of birth: 26 August 1960

Coaching Qualification:

Career as a Coach:2001 – present Mini Football club “Kazakhstan” tulpar 2008 Head coach of KAZAKHSTAN Futsal National Team 2010 Head Coach of KYRGYZSTAN Futsal National Team

Tactics:-

Defensive – They are from the few teams that played diamond defense and cover the area with tactical moves without losing the shape of the team and they moved together as a unit.

Offensive – They play with a good attacking tactics through the wings to break the opponent’s defense and sent fast passes to the penalty area or to the player who would penetrate from behind to shoot directly at the goal Physical condition

They were in a very good physical condition and were well prepared physically with young players

Mental aspect

They were well prepared in the mental aspect and it was clearly shown in their matches except the last match with Japan wherein their players entered this game unprepared mentally to win so they loss badly.

Group C Final Ranking: 6th PLACE

68

UZBEKISTAN 2010


69


LEBANON Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Lebanon vs. Uzbekistan 1:3 (0-2)24 May 2010 Lebanon vs. Chinese Taipei 6:4 (3-1)25 May 2010 Lebanon vs. Indonesia 4:2 (1-2)

Quarter Final27 May 2010 Lebanon vs. Iran 1:7 (1-4)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Lebanon Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 RABIE JAMIL EL KAKHI (GK) 40 40 40 40 160 1 3 11 16 15

3 HASSAN HAMMOUD 6 9 - 6 21 2 2

5 HASSAN CHAITO 9 26 15 10 70 3 1 8 2 6 8 7

6 IBRAHIM HAMMOUD 25 20 30 23 98 1 3 1 1 11 2

7 RAMY EL LADKI - 10 - 4 14 2 1 1 2

8 KASSEM KAWSAN 24 27 27 23 101 4 4 1 6 3 10 6 7 1

9 ALI EL HOMSI 19 16 11 19 65 2 1 4 1 6 6 3

10 HAYSSAM ATWI 19 32 31 28 110 2 9 2 5 5 26 5 10

11 KHALED TAKAJI - - 31 31 62 3 13 1 13 4 14 6 7 1 1

12 ALI GEBEILY (GK) - - - - -

14 MAHMOUD ITANI 20 14 13 11 58 3 5 2 7 4 5 1

15 MOHAMMAD ISKANDARANI 10 18 - 7 35 5 5 4

19 HUSSEIN HAMADANI(GK) - - - - -


Goal Scorers:

KASSEM KAWSAN 4HASSAN CHAITO 3KHALED TAKAJI 3HAYSSAM ATWI 2


• No 11: Khaled Takaji – Quick, clever and skillful• No 10: Hayssam Atwi – Skillful and good in both feet. Always

involved• No 14: Mahmoud Itani – Strong and big. Able to pass, shoot

and shield the ball well.

Key Points:

• Formation varies between 2-2 and 1-2-1• Physically strong individuals• Most players were skillful• Willing to move and try to rotate when attacked• Not ideal in combination play• Have good ability to build up from behind• Quick transition between offence and defense • Strong in I v 1 duel• Quite confident

System/Formation:

Formation varies between 2-2 and 1-2-1

Style of Play:

2-2 is their basic formation. They have 2 groups of outfield players. Within each group, there is one strong ‘Pivot’. That made them could be able to alter their attacking tactics from 2-2 rotation to 1-2-1. They occupied the 4 to 4 substitution and also 1 replacing 1 at a time. Since the Lebanon players are strong enough, they would use man to man marking from the upper court during defend.


Coach:

Coach: Dory ZAKHOUR (Lebanese)

Day of birth: 8 April 1971

Coaching Qualification:AFC “B” Licence Certificate AFC Futsal Level 1 Coaching Certificate

Career as a Coach:International Coaching:2010 Lebanon National Futsal Team Club Coaching:Pro’s Café Salam Zgharta

Technical:

Most of their players are good on the ball. They are not just confidence in the 1 v 1 dual, but also able to keep the ball possession well.

Tactics:-

Defensive – As mentioned above that they are strong in 1 v 1. Most of the time they would use the man to man marking plus pressing in the upper court, trying to win the ball possession as soon as possible. If they could work more as a team, Lebanon may become more difficult to play against.

Offensive – From 2-2 to 1-2-1 system. Since they have skillful and strong player in front to act as a ‘Pivot’ and able to stop the ball around the ‘D’. They start the attack with the 2-2 formation with some rotation but change suddenly into 1-2-1 and look for the ‘Pivot’, the quickly support from behind. Physical condition

Most games could see Lebanon use same group of 4 outfield players to play up to 6-7 minutes before making any substitution.

Mental aspect

Lebanon players also showed they have really tough mentality

Group A Final Ranking: 7th PLACE

70

UZBEKISTAN 2010


71


THAILAND Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Thailand vs. Kyrgyzstan 4:2 (1-2)24 May 2010 Thailand vs. Korea Republic 10:3 (6-0)25 May 2010 Thailand vs. Vietnam 5:2 (3-1) Quarter Final 27 May 2010 Thailand vs. China PR 2:9 (1-4)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Thailand Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 ROJJANAMETHEE-SAP SUKRIT (GK) - - - 5 5

2 PANDEE PARINYA (GK) - 20 - 18 38 5 5 3

3 SUTTIROJ NAT-THAPON 8 - 11 20 39 1 1 1 5 2

4 JANTA PANUWAT - 15 23 14 52 2 9 2 8 2 19 5 3 1

5 ISSARASUWIPA-KORN LERTCHAI 25 7 - 16 48 3 5 1 9 3 14 11 4

6 SAISORN PANOM-KORN 22 6 10 - 38 6 7 2 11 6 4 1

7 WONGKAEO KRIT-SADA 2 24 19 6 51 1 1 3 1 5 4 3 1

8 SANTANAPRASIT TANAKORN 12 15 22 18 67 4 2 10 4 2

9 THUEANKLANG SUPHAWUT 27 15 15 16 73 6 15 18 4 12 4 6 1

10 SURATSAWANG EKAPONG 18 23 40 32 113 1 1 4 3 8 7 8

12 TOMPA SURAPONG (GK) 40 20 26 18 104 4 1 11 12 15 1 1

13 KHUMTHINKAEW SERMPHAN 26 13 19 17 75 4 2 9 1 13 3 5

14 CHALAEMKHET KEATTIYOT 19 16 8 12 55 4 6 13 15 5 2

15 THUSIRI NA-TEE 19 17 - - 36 2 5 4 2 2 3 2 2


Goal Scorers:

THUEANKLANG SUPHAWUT 6CHALAEMKHET KEATTIYOT 4ISSARASUWIPAKORN LERTCHAI 3JANTA PANUWAT 2THUSIRI NA-TEE 2SURATSAWANG EKAPONG 1WONGKAEO KRITSADA 1 Outstanding Players:

• No 14 CHALAEMKHET KEATTIYOT– skillful, calm, clever and fast

• No 9 THUEANKLANG SUPHAWUT –strong, shield the ball well and able to score with both feet

Key Points:

• Basic formation is 2-2 but may change to 3-1• Players are quite skillful • Able to build up from behind• Like to attack with long passes sometimes• Able to perform well when under pressure• Able to dictate the game tempo when playing against weaker

teams• Potential to be improved as they have a young and new

squad• Very good physical condition

System/Formation:

Basic formation is 2-2 but change to 3-1 quite easily.

Style of Play:

They have the ability to build up from behind. Plenty of rotations during attack and look towards the front players to score, occasionally make use of the diagonal moves. They would use long ball tactics if under pressure in their own half. Normally, they prefer to defend tightly in own half and launch the quick counter attack after winning ball possession.


Coach:

Coach: PARZOS MENDES JOSE MARIA (SPAIN) Date of birth: 28th March, 1974

Coaching Qualification:Spanish Coaching License

Career as a Coach:|2008 – Present Head Coach of Thailand team 2006 – 2007 Autos Lobelle Santiago (Spain) MNK Orkan Zagreb (Crotia) 2004 – 2006 Barcel Evro (Spain) 2003 – 2004 Valencia Vilusa (Spain) 2002 – 2003 Muebles Caloto (Spain) 2001 – 2003 Azkar Lugo (Spain) Melilla L. S. (Spain) Lobelle Santiago (Spain)

Technical:

Most of their players are skillful. Some of them are good at both feet and very quick. Their long passes were quite accurate too.

Tactics:-

Defensive – They defend in their own half normally but will push up to press when needed. Mainly using zonal defense and changed to man mark and press aggressively when they are behind. They can press as well as mark man to man for a long time due to their high endurance.

Offensive – Play with 2-2 system and kept rotating during attack and would suddenly change to 1-3 and look towards the back player to stop the ball then support quickly. They are also quite good in using diagonal moves from one side to the other occasionally. Physical condition

They were in a very good physical condition and were well prepared physically with young players

Mental aspect

They had good spirit and showed great confidence but lack experience.


72

UZBEKISTAN 2010


73


INDONESIA Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Indonesia vs. Chinese Taipei 6:1 (4-1)24 May 2010 Indonesia vs. Uzbekistan 2:4 (0-1)25 May 2010 Indonesia vs. Lebanon 2:4 (2-1)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Indonesia Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 YOS ADI WICAKSONO(GK) 18 40 40 98 7 1 1 19 13 16

2 AHMAD SURYA MOLANA(GK) 2 - - 2 1 2

4 HAIRUL SALEH OHORELLA 14 18 17 49 1 4 1 4 4 2

5 SOCRATES MATULESSY 16 27 27 70 1 3 1 6 5

6 KARISMAWAN - - 3 3

7 JAELANI LADJANIBI 17 27 27 71 1 11 7 1 20 2 13 2

8 VENNARD VONARZA VICTOR HUTABARAT 16 18 17 51 1 5 1 1 10 1 2 1

9 SAYAN KARMADI - 25 23 48 1 4 6 4

10 DENY HANDOYO 16 20 18 54 1 1 11 5 3

11 JEFRI PURBA 15 - - 15 1 1 1 1 3 1 1

13 ANGGA SURYA SAPUTRA 9 9 11 29 2 3 1

15 ALI HAIDAR 15 5 9 29 2 1 5 1 2

17 INDRA KURNIA PURNOMO 22 16 19 57 1 2 7 3 1

18 BENNY HERA 10 - - 10 1 2 1 1


Goal Scorers:

ALI HAIDAR 2DENY HANDOYO 1BENNY HERA 1HAIRUL SALEH OHORELLA 1JAELANI LADJANIBI 1JEFRI PURBA 1SAYAN KARMADI 1SOCRATES MATULESSY 1VENNARD VONARZA VICTOR HUTABARAT 1


• No 1 (GK) Yos Adi Wicaksono – Calm, stable and quick reaction

• No 8 Vennard Vonarza Victor Hutabarat – Capt, calm and clever

• No 9 Sayan Karmadi – Quite strong, shield the ball well and able to score with both feet

Key Points:

• Basic formation is 2-2 but may change to 3-1• Players are quite skillful and agile• Able to build up from behind• Like to attack with long passes occasionally• Not able to perform well when under pressing• Could control the game better when playing against weaker

team• Potential to be improved as they have a young and new

squad• Moderate physical condition• Mentality was not tough enough

System/Formation:

Basic formation is 2-2 but change to 3-1 quite sometimes

Style of Play:

They have the ability to build up from behind. Plenty of rotations during attack and look towards the front player around the “D” suddenly or make use of the diagonal moves. They would use plenty of long balls if under press in own half. Normally, they prefer to defend tightly in their own half and launched quick counter attacks after winning ball possession.

Goal scored: 11 Goal conceded: 12

Coach:

Coach: ROBBY HARTONO

Date of birth: 6 December 1966


Career as a Coach:National team coach

Technical:

Most of their players are quite skillful. Some of them are good at both feet like No. 8 and No. 9. Their long passes were quite accurate too.

Tactics:-

Defensive –

They defend in their own half normally but will push up to press when needed. Mainly using zonal defense and changed to man mark and press aggressively when they are behind.

Offensive –

Play with 2-2 system, kept rotating during attack and suddenly change to 3-1 and look towards the front players to stop the ball then support quickly from behind. They are also quite good in using diagonal moves from one side to the other occasionally. Physical condition

Moderate physical condition

Mental aspect

Positive and strong approach towards all matches but lack concentration.


74

UZBEKISTAN 2010


75


VIETNAM Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Vietnam vs. Korea Republic 7:3 (2-1)24 May 2010 Vietnam vs. Kyrgyzstan 2:4 (0-2)25 May 2010 Vietnam vs. Thailand 2:5 (1-3)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Vietnam Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


2 LE THE CUONG - - 10 10 1 5

4 NGUYEN TRONG THIEN 19 19 19 57 3 1 1 4 8 4 2 1

5 PHAM MINH GIANG 23 21 13 57 1 4 1 3 4 1 1

7 HUYNH BA TUAN 15 18 21 54 2 4 3 2 10 5 3 1

8 NGUYEN QUANG MINH 0 19 16 35 1 1 2 11 4 3 1

10 NGUYEN BAO QUAN 23 26 22 71 4 2 5 15 1 1

11 NGUYEN HONG GIANG 23 19 16 58 1 7 1 2 4 9 7 2 1

12 TRUONG QUOC TUAN 11 15 13 39 1 2 1 5 2 2

15 NGO ANH DUNG 8 13 17 38 2 2 3 5 4 2 1

16 NGO DUY KHANH - 11 - 11 2 2 2

17 TRAN HOANG VINH 22 19 15 56 3 6 1 9 1 9 5 2 1

18 NGUYEN QUOC BAO 8 9 13 30 1 1 2 1 1 4 3 3

19 NGUYEN VAN HUY(GK) 0 12 35 47 9 2 7 3 13

20 DANG PHUOC ANH(GK) 40 19 - 59 1 1 5 5 15


Goal Scorers:

NGUYEN TRONG THIEN 3TRAN HOANG VINH 3HUYNH BA TUAN 2NGUYEN HONG GIANG 1NGUYEN QUOC BAO 1


• No. 4 NGUYEN TRONG THIEN technically strong and good composure

• No. 20 DANG PHUOC ANH(GK)– skilful and creative

Key Points:

• Basic formation is 3-1, may change to 4-0• Very good fighting spirit• Quite quick during changing ball possession• Good in building up from behind but their attacks were

without any finishing• They have some skillful players in No.4 and No.16• Good confidence but no experience • They were a team which is better in defending• They use short passes and depend on the wings

System/Formation:

Flexible 4-0 or 3-1

Style of Play:

Concentrate mainly in defense and tried to build a good attack. They have very good spirit. The have young players who were physically fit enough to press the ball in their court . Whenever they win the ball, they plan the counter attack quickly.

Technical:

Some of their players were technically good although not very skillful. They worked as a team quite well but their finishing ability was not that good.


Coach:

Coach: Sergio Gargelli (ITALIAN)

Day of birth: 28 May 1974

Coaching Qualification:Italian coaching license Spanish coaching license

Career as a Coach:1 -1 - 2010 to present Vietnam national team head coach 1 -5 - 2009 Japan national team 2nd coach and keeper coach Prato Italian serie A2 - b Fucho Athletic Japan

Tactics:-

Defensive – Man to man marking in their area and zonal defense. They defended in their own half normally but able to push up to press when needed.

Offensive – Their ability to build from behind is not bad. They rely on quick wings for attack. When they are under press in their own half, they would change from 3-1 to 2-2 and use plenty of short passes to the wings then push up to support with key player behind always. Physical condition

They have very good physical condition. This made them able to press in the opposite team and attack as they win the ball. Also, they have quite strong team defense.

Mental aspect

Good spirit. They showed great confidence in all the games thanks to their new coach.


76

UZBEKISTAN 2010


77


IRAQ Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Iraq vs. Turkmenistan 5:3 (1-1)24 May 2010 Iraq vs. Japan 1:10 (1-3)25 May 2010 Iraq vs. China P.R. 6:7 (0-2)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Iraq Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 UTAYL KHALEEL ABDULQADER (GK) 40 22 40 102 19 11 7

2 MUSTAFA BACHAY HAMZAH 16 29 30 75 3 4 7 2 4 3 4

4 ABDULRAZZAQ ABU-ALHAIL LABID 6 3 - 9 1 2 2

5HUSSEIN ABD ALI MOHAMMED AL-ZUBAIDI

39 25 - 64 1 5 1 8 2 8 5 7 2

6 MUSTAFA SAADI MAHDI 15 21 14 50 3 4 1 3 4 2

7 ADMON HANNA ESHO QASHA 4 11 11 26 1 1 1 1 5 1 1

8 HASHIM KHALID KADHIM AL-SARAF 3 - 20 23 2 1 2 2 7 1

9 ZAMAN MAJID SALIM 18 12 10 40 1 4 2 2 2 2 1

10ABDULKAREEM GHAZI RADHI AL-SHARSHAHI

17 14 26 57 1 2 5 2 6

11KARRAR MOHSIN MOHAMMED AL THABETI

30 26 34 90 5 8 3 7 2 12 4 4 1

14 HAITHAM ABDUL-MUNEM JABBAR 11 9 9 29 2 2 4 1 3

15OMAR KHALEEL MUSTAFA AL-ANI (GK)

- 30 - 30 5 3 3


Goal Scorers:

KARRAR MOHSIN MOHAMMED AL THABETI 5 MUSTAFA BACHAY HAMZAH 3ABDULKAREEM GHAZI RADHI AL-SHARSHAHI 1 ADMON HANNA ESHO QASHA 1ZAMAN MAJID SALIM 1HUSSEIN ABD ALI MOHAMMED AL-ZUBAIDI 1


• No. 5 HUSSEIN ABD ALI MOHAMMED AL-ZUBAIDI – very athletic, technically strong and good composure

• No 11 KARRAR MOHSIN MOHAMMED AL THABETI – skillful dribbler and scorer and can end any attack

Key Points:

• Formation varies 1-2-1/2-2/3-1• Efficient and compact defending• Excellent tactical awareness• Excellent use of wing areas• Quick transfer from defense to offence

System/Formation:

Flexible 1.1.2.1 or 1.3.1

Style of Play:

They played the diamond formation most of the time in defense and performed it very well and closed the area by moving together without losing the shape of the team but needs more physical strength and experience and they should change to other formation according to the opponent’s attacking strategies

Technical:

Players are skillful on the average. No. 11 is good in both feet and No. 5 is powerful and skillful . The accuracy of passing was very good but they do not have enough experience.


Coach:

Coach: ASAAD LAZIM ALI AL-HAMADANI

Day of birth: 1 July 1957


Career as a Coach:2008 – present National team coach

Tactics:-

Defensive – They are the few teams that played diamond defense and covered the area with tactical moves without losing the shape of the team and they move together cohesively most of the time but at times they failed to do so.

Offensive – They played with good attacking tactics by depending on the wings to break the opponent’s defense and send fast passes to the penalty area specially to No.11 or to the player who comes from behind to shoot directly at the goal. Physical condition

They were in a good physical condition but they were not well prepared physically with young players who did not always do what they were instructed to do on the pitch.

Mental aspect

They were well prepared in the mental aspect and it was clearly shown in their matches except the last match The players entered this game mentally unprepared so they sustained a loss.

Group D Final Ranking: 11th PLACE

78

UZBEKISTAN 2010


79


TAJIKISTAN Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Tajikestan vs. Iran 2:19 (0-8)24 May 2010 Tajikestan vs. Kuwait 4:3 (3-0)25 May 2010 Tajikestan vs. Australia 4:5 (2-2)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Tajikistan Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 SHARIPOV MIRALI (GK) 24 40 40 104 5 17 22 20

2 VASIEV DILSHOD 26 10 14 50 1 2 6 6 1 1

3 NIYATBEKOV SHAMSHOD - - - -

4 ZUBAYDOV RUSLAN - - - -

5 FAYZULLAEV FIRDAVS 17 34 26 77 15 6 10

6 FATKHULLOEV FATKHULO 31 23 21 75 1 3 1 9 2 2

7 ISMOILOV OBIDJON 26 17 20 63 1 2 10 8 1 1

9 MAKHMUDOV KHURSHED 33 29 29 91 2 7 2 12 2 23 7 2

10 JUMAEV SHERZOD 32 16 23 71 3 9 1 7 3 5 1

11 ULMASOV ALISHER - 31 30 61 3 2 11 4

12 MIRZOEV ANVARSHO(GK) - - - -

14 AKNAZAROV DALER - - - -

15 BIBUDOV SHUKHRAT(GK) 16 - - 16 1 2 3

17 MAMEDBABAEV MANSUR - - - -


Goal Scorers:

JUMAEV SHERZOD 3ULMASOV ALISHER 3 MAKHMUDOV KHURSHED 2VASIEV DILSHOD 1FATKHULLOEV FATKHULO 1


• No 5 Fayzullaev Firdavs – Capt., Calm and strong leader• No 11 Ulmasov Alisher – Quite quick and have good feet

Key Points:

• Basic formation is 1-2-1 and changing to 2-2 sometimes• Players have moderate Futsal skills• Trying to move during rotation but without pattern• Look for their “Pivot” in most of their attack• Without a fixed “Pivot”• Lack of combination plays• Play more individually but not as a team• Poor in defending both as individual and as a team• Willing to participate

System/Formation:

Basic formation is 1-2-1 and change to 2-2 at times.

Style of Play:

Played individually but not work as a team. Players like to attack but do not concentrate on defending. Used 1-2-1 as their basic attacking formation. Look for the Target Player in front then support quickly from behind but they do not have a fixed “Pivot”. They do not combine well as a team.

Technical:

Moderate skills. Some of them are quick and have the ability to dribble and beat oppositions.


Coach:

Coach: Kamaletdinov Damir Date of birth: 14 March 1968

Coaching Qualification: Futsal coach

Career as a Coach: 2006 – present National team coach

Tactics:

Defensive – They adopted the 2-2 system with zonal defending most of the time. Stay in their own half to defend but changed to 1-3 whenever they want to play a safer game.

Offensive – 1-2-1 was their basic formation. They tried to play to the target player to stop the ball at the front then support quickly from behind. However, they do not have a fixed “Pivot”. Occasionally they would change to 2-2 attacking system. Physical condition

Some players are quick but physically they were not well prepared to compete in this Championship.

Mental aspect

Keen on attack but lack concentration when defending. Willing to take risks.


80

UZBEKISTAN 2010


81


KOREA REP Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Korea Rep vs. Vietnam 3:7 (1-2)24 May 2010 Korea Rep vs. Thailand 3:10 (0-6)25 May 2010 Korea Rep vs. Kyrgyzstan 4:4 (1-2)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Korea Rep Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 HAN MINKYU (GK) 40 1 38 78 12 8 5

2 HA JIN WON 4 - - 4 2 2

3 HUR MYUNGBUM(GK) - 33 - 33 4 2 4

4 JEONG EUIHYUN 15 18 27 60 4 1 1 2 2 8 3 2 1

6 SEOK DAE SUNG - 15 14 29 1 2 1 2 1 1

7 JANG MINGYU 11 16 14 41 1 4 2 1

8 KIM JEONGNAM 24 25 28 77 4 9 12 4 8 1 1

9 OH HYUNJONG 17 5 3 25 1 2 1 2 1 1

10 KIM IN WOO - 25 27 52 2 2 1 2 2

11 SHIN JONGHOON 27 26 14 67 1 10 1 13 1 9 3 2 1

12 HEO CHANGWOO 16 16 12 44 3 1 1 1 2 3

16 KANG SUNGMIN 9 - 12 21 1 1 1

18 KANG KYUNG MOOK 14 12 - 26 1

19 CHOI BYUNG JUN - 9 - 9 1 1 2 1


Goal Scorers:

JEONG EUIHYUN 4KIM JEONGNAM 4SEOK DAE SUNG 1SHIN JONGHOON 1


• No 8 KIM JEONGNAM – very athletic and technically strong • No 11 SHIN JONGHOON – skilful dribbler and creative

player

Key Points:

• Basic formation is 3-1, may change to 4-0• Very good fighting spirit• Quite fast during change of ball possession• Good in building up from behind but their attack was without

finishing• They have some skillful players in No.11 and No.4• Good confidence but no experience • They are a team which is better in defending• They used short passes and depend on the wings

System/Formation:

Flexible 4-0 or 3-1

Style of Play:

Concentrated on defending and tried to build a good attack. They have very good spirits and have young players who were physically fit enough to press the ball in their court . Whenever they win the ball, they plan the counter- attack but were quick at it. Technical:

Some of their players were technically good. Although not very skillful, they work as a team quite well but their finishing ability was wanting.


Coach:

Coach: LEE CHANG HWAN

Date of birth: 22 January 1970

Coaching Qualification:Futsal coach

Career as a Coach: 2010

Tactics:-

Defensive – Combined with man to man marking in their area and zonal defend. They defended in their own half normally and were able to push up to press when needed.

Offensive – Their ability to build from behind is not bad. They rely on quick wings to attack. When they are under press in their own half, they would change from 3-1 to 2-2 and used plenty of short passes to the wings with key player behind always. Physical condition

They have very good physical condition. This enabled them to press in the opponent’s half and start their attack right away. They were also quick in switching to defending the moment they lost possession of the ball.

Mental aspect

Good fighting spirit and showed great confidence in all matches.


82

UZBEKISTAN 2010


83


TURKMENISTAN Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Turkmenistan vs. Iraq 3:5 (1-1)24 May 2010 Turkmenistan vs. China P.R. 2:6 (2-4)25 May 2010 Turkmenistan vs. Japan 0:1 (0-1)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Turkmenistan Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


1 TASHLIYEV ILDAR(GK) 40 40 40 120 5 1 10 1 12 8 8

2 MUHAMMEDOV NURYAGDY 20 18 15 53 1 1 2 2 1 9 3 3 1

3 ESENMAMEDOV BAYRAMMURAT 21 23 18 62 1 3 4 7 10 5 1 2

4 ANNAMEREDOV PERMAN 7 3 6 16 1 1 1

5 ANNAYEV DOVLET-MURAD - - - - 1 1

6 OVEZOV VELSAHAT 21 27 18 66 2 1 1 9 3 1 2

7 ATAYEV SERDARALI 16 17 11 44 1 1 2 3

8 KANAYEV GUVANCH 11 13 8 32 4 7 5

9 CHARIYEV ANNAB-ERDY 19 20 17 56 1 1 6 1 3 1

10 MUHAMEDMURA-DOV MEKAN - - 25 25 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

11 ATAYEV MERGEN 23 21 29 73 1 1 6 3 11 4 3

13 ORAZOV MERGEN 23 20 20 63 3 4 1 7 1

15 ATAYEV VATAN 12 16 - 28 1 2

16 MEREDOV CHARIYAR(GK) - - - -


Goal Scorers:

ATAYEV SERDARALI 1CHARIYEV ANNABERDY 1ESENMAMEDOV BAYRAMMURAT 1MUHAMEDMURADOV MEKAN 1 MUHAMMEDOV NURYAGDY 1


• None

Key Points:

• Formation: Alternating between 4-0 and 3-1• Quite skillful individuals • Plenty of good moves in rotation• Try to find the Pivot suddenly while rotating• Playing aggressively • Improved a lot under the new coach in terms of attack and

defense as a team• Some effective long passes• Needs to improve the combination play

System/Formation:

Alternating between 4-0 and 3-1

Style of Play:

Start with 4-0 normally but change to 3-1 suddenly and try to find the Pivot. However, their combination plays were not good enough although they have quite skillful individuals. Their physical condition was quite good which was the reason why they were able to press in the upper court and launch the counter attack quickly. Technical:

Players were skillful on the average. The accuracy of passing was erratic.


Coach:

Coach: KUROCHKIN VICTOR

Day of birth: 29 September 1954

Coaching Qualification: Futsal coach

Career as a Coach:2004 Assistant Coach 2005-2006 Goal-keeper Coach 2007-2008 Assistant Coach 2010-present Head Coach

Tactics:-

Defensive – Zonal defend mainly. Sometimes start defending from the half way line and at other times press in the upper field then, change to man to man when they need the time badly to retrieve the ball

Offensive – Play aggressively normally. Plenty of rotation but the variations were insufficient. Their basic form was 4-0 but may suddenly change to 3-1 by moving the ball fast to the wings then look for the Pivot. Physical condition

The physical condition of their players was good which could be the reason why they were able to press in the upper court. Most of their players are quick.

Mental aspect

They played aggressively and confidently. Fearless and fought for every ball.

Group D Final Ranking: 14th PLACE

84

UZBEKISTAN 2010


85


CHINESE TAIPEI Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Chinese Taipei vs. Indonesia 1:6 (1-4)24 May 2010 Chinese Taipei vs. Lebanon 4:6 (1-3)25 May 2010 Chinese Taipei vs. Uzbekistan 1:4 (0-1)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Chinese Taipei Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


2 FANG, CHING-JEN 26 19 17 62 4 1 6 1 15 5 3

3 LIN, PO-YUAN 7 9 8 24 1 2 5 3 2

4 FENG, PAO-HSING 24 16 18 58 1 5 1 5 9 3

5 LEE, MENG-CHIAN 14 21 14 49 3 1 11 1

6 WEN CHIH-HAO - - 12 12 2 1

8 LO, CHIH-AN 28 21 15 64 2 5 16 11 1

9 WANG CHIH-SHENG 14 20 14 48 1 1 5 5 2 1 1

10 HUNG, KAI-CHUN 11 - 7 18 1 1 9 1

11 CHANG FU-HSIANG 16 20 12 48 1 4 11 5 3

12 CHIANG, YUNG-SUAN(GK) 40 40 18 98 9 2 23 10 10

13 CHEN, YU-LIN 28 22 18 68 2 2 1 12 5 3

14 PAN, KUAO-KAI 7 14 10 31 2 5 4 3


Goal Scorers:

FANG, CHING-JEN 4LO, CHIH-AN 1WANG CHIH-SHENG 1 Outstanding Players:

• No 2, FANG Ching-jen: Hard working, always on the move and able to score goals

• No 5, LEE Meng-Chian: Team commander, calm and intelligent

Key Points:

• Basic formation is 1-2-1, may change to 2-2• Very good fighting spirit• Quite quick duringt the moment of changing ball possession• Able and fit enough to press in the upper half• Not good in building up from behind but their counter attacks

were not bad• They have some skillful players like No.2, No. 5 and No. 11• Quite confident• They are a team which is better in defending• Like to use long passes especially when using 2-2 formation

(if under press)

System/Formation:

Alternating between 1-2-1 and 2-2

Style of Play:

Concentrated in defending and looked for quick counter attack. They have very good fighting spirit. Even though they are amateur players, they were physically fit enough to press in upper court and made it difficult for their opponents to keep the ball well. Whenever they win the ball, they launch the counter attack quite quickly.


Coach:

Coach: Kuei-Jeh CHEN

Day of birth: 6 July 1968

Coaching Qualification:AFC “B” Licence Certificate

Career as a Coach:2006-2010 Chinese Taipei National Futsal Team Head Coach

Technical:

Some of their players were technically good. Although not very skillful, they work as a team quite well But their finishing ability was not ideal.

Tactics:-

Defensive – Man to man marking and zonal defending. They defended in their own half normally but were able to push up to press when needed.

Offensive – Did not have the ability to build up from behind. They relied on quick counter attacks. When they were under press in their own half, they would change from 1-2-1 to 2-2 and used plenty of long passes to the opponent’s t half then push up to support and or press. Physical condition

They have quite good physical condition. This enabled them to press in the opponent’s half. They were also quite strong in 1 v 1 duel.

Mental aspect

Good fighting spirit. No matter which team they played against, they showed great confidence.


86

UZBEKISTAN 2010


87


KUWAIT Group Matches:

23 May 2010 Kuwait vs. Australia 2:4 (1-2)24 May 2010 Kuwait vs. Tajikistan 3:4 (0-3)25 May 2010 Kuwait vs. Iran 0:7 (0-2)

TEAM DATA:



Team: Kuwait Attacking DefendingSanctions


Player Goalkeeper

Match1

Match2

Match3

Match4

Match5


4 ABDULAZIZ M A F N ALBASAM 5 13 10 28 2 10 3 3 1

5 HAMAD F. M. H. A. A. HAYAT 17 16 6 39 5 1 11 2 2

6 SAUD J A S ALMA-RIAH 8 6 25 39 2 2 9 10 2

7 HAMAD A O Y A ALOTHMAN 26 28 30 84 5 1 10 12 11 2

8 MESHARI I GH H M ALNAKKAS 24 11 - 35 1 4 8 2 2 2

9 ALI A I M ALBUTAI - - 5 5 1

11 HAMZAH F A H MUHAMMAD 14 18 30 62 1 5 6 1 14 4 1 1

14 SALEM Y. S. AMAN 4 17 26 47 1 5 4 6 5 3 1

15 OMAR A A I M ALJASER 22 26 - 48 2 6 3 7 3 3

17 MOHAMMAD N H M ASHKANANI(GK) - - 2 2

18 SALEM T S A S ALMEKAIMI 23 27 28 78 1 4 1 9 1 11 2 3

19 MOHAMMAD F. R. N. M. ALDOUSARI 9 3 - 12 3 1 2 1 1

20SAYYEDHASAN M S H S A A S EBRAHEEM(GK)

38 39 40 117 4 1 9 16 34


Goal Scorers:

OMAR A A I M ALJASER 2HAMZAH F A H MUHAMMAD 1SALEM T S A S ALMEKAIMI 1SALEM Y. S. AMAN 1 Outstanding Players:

• No 7 Hamad AOYA Alothman – Capt., skillful and strong

Key Points:

• Formation 2-2• Players are agile• Some rotation during attack but without pattern• Poor passing quality. Too many careless passes• Insufficient tactical mind• Combination play was rare• Finishing ability was poor• No concentration during game• Could play better if the players concentrated more• Able to push up to press in the upper court

System/Formation:

2-2 Formation both in attack and defend

Style of Play:

Stayed in their own half to defend and to look for quick counter attack. Although they did not combined well as a unit, they tried to rotate during their attack. Unfortunately, their rotation did not have pattern and variations making it difficult to create opportunities.

Technical:

Players were agile and have quick feet but their Futsal skills were not ideal.


Coach:

Coach: Eisa Falah Saadoun

Day of birth: 28 April 1967

Coaching Qualification:A Licence (Football) Coaching Instructor Futsal

Career as a Coach:2010 National team coach

Tactics:-

Defensive – Occupied the 2-2 system in defend. Zonal defend combined with man marking.Stayed in their own half to defend normally but could be able to push up a bit to press sometime.

Offensive – They basically used the 2-2 formation. Some rotation during the attack but not mature in their moves. Combination plays were very rare, thus, their attack could hardly create good opportunities.

Physical condition

Players were quick and agile but not strong enough. Physical condition was not ideal

Mental aspect

Careless most of the time but could become more attentive when needed.


88

UZBEKISTAN 2010


89

AFC DELEGATIONS

Name Country Designation

Junji Ogura JAPAN Head of Delegation

SHIN MANGIL KOREA, REPUBLIC Head of Administration

ALI TARGHOLIZADE I.R. IRAN Tournament Director

MOHAMED FAIROZE MUHISEEN SRI LANKA Venue Manager

YU JIN HO KOREA, REPUBLIC Venue Manager

SEE MEI CHIAT MALAYSIA Assistant Venue Manager

GLYCHMAMEDOV MAKSAT TURKMENISTAN Assistant Venue Manager

HAMID MOHAMMED ALI AL-SHAIBANI YEMEN Disciplinary Representative

SELINA LEE SIEW CHOO MALAYSIA Finance

LAZARUS JANSEN A/L XAVIER BENNY MALAYSIA Legal Dept

BAWANIE THORARAJU MALAYSIA Logistics/Protocol - Accomodation

BRIAN JOHNSON MALAYSIA Logistics/Protocol - Accomodation

HIYOSHI KENTARO JAPAN Marketing Officer

TOKABAEV KEMEL KYRGYZSTAN Match Commissioner

ABDUL GHAFOOR ABDUL HAMEED MALDIVES Match Commissioner

TALAL MAH'D ALI ALSWAILMYEEN JORDAN Match Commissioner

PENANO DAVID DWIGHT BALDOZA PHILIPPINES Match Commissioner

ARIFOV ALIM UZBEKISTAN Media Officer

KUCHKOROV RUSTAM UZBEKISTAN Media Officer

CARPIO EDNA PONELAS PHILIPPINES Medical Coordinator

AL RIYAMI MASOUD ALI MASOUD OMAN Medical/Doping Control Officer

INWOOD MEECHAI THAILAND Medical/Doping Control Officer

PIRMUKHAMEDOV KHASAN UZBEKISTAN Photographer

ILYASOV ANVAR UZBEKISTAN Photographer

ABDUL RAZAK BIN ANUAR SINGAPORE Referee Coordinator

DEBORAH MARY PEREIRA MALAYSIA Secretary

ZURAYA BINTI OSMAN MALAYSIA Secretary

NG BEE HIOK MALAYSIA Secretary

TSANG WAI CHUNG HONG KONG TSG Officer

HASAN MOHAMMAD HAMID ABU RASS JORDAN TSG Officer

NGANGA STEPHEN TIMOTHY KENYA AV TSG Officer

MAMETOV BAHTIYOR UZBEKISTAN Website Writer

NIZAMOV FAKHRIDDINKHON UZBEKISTAN Website Writer

MATSUZAKI YASUHIRO JAPAN Futsal Referee Inspector

MOUSAVI SEYED SADRODDIN I.R. IRAN Futsal Referee Inspector

SAMINATHEN MARIMUTHU MALAYSIA Futsal Referee Inspector

WONG PO ON ANDY HONG KONG Futsal Referee Inspector

90

UZBEKISTAN 2010


91

Each group consists of 5 local assistants; the local TSG assistants with coaching backgrounds eagerly worked very hard through out the tournament to gather technical information as well as gaining own Technical Study’s experience in this very important tournament. They concentrated in what they had been assigned to do and follow the instruction given by the group leaders very well.

Since the initial TSG requirements is more proper and quiet official areas for the technical study in both venues, the TSG members had to sit together in the upper area behind the top level of stands to gain optimal observation in the main stadium. But in the Auxiliary stadium, we had to locate ourselves in front of the playing area. Meanwhile with team work and cooperation of TSG members and devoted assistants had big achievement to execute the technical study group’s assignments and could manage to do best analysis of the matches.

TSG MEMBERS AND ASSISTANTS

The TSG had been divided into 2 groups:

Group ‘A’ leaded by Mr. Tsang Wai Chung AFC Elite Futsal Instructor as the head of Technical Study Group from Hong Kong Group ‘B’ guided by Mr. Hasan abu Rass AFC Elite Futsal Instructor from Jordan as the member of Technical Study Group.

Asian Football ConfederationAFC House, Jalan 1/155B, Buki t Jal i l , 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Tel : +603 8994 3388 | Fax : +603 8994 2689 | Emai l : market [email protected]

Official Home of Asian Football

Documents

UZBEKISTAN 2010 AFC Futsal Championship UZBEKISTAN …res.cloudinary.com/deltatreafcprod/image/upload/zamtmhcnv622qujavsmt.pdf1 AFC Futsal Championship UZBEKISTAN 2010 23-30 MAY 2010