21
Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals D. Roosendans

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in … Refining & Chemicals 3 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015 Nr

  • Upload
    lehuong

  • View
    224

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals

D. Roosendans

TOTAL Refining & Chemicals

2 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

TOTAL Refining & Chemicals

3 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Nr Site Country

1 TOTAL Petrochemicals Antwerpen Belgium

2 Appryl (Lavera) France

3 Feluy Belgium

4 El Prat Spain

5 Ravenna Italy

6 Kralupy Czech republic

7 Plateforme de Normandie France

8 TOTAL Olefins Antwerpen Belgium

9 Antwerp Refinery Belgium

10 NaphtaChimie (Lavera) France

11 La Mede Refinery France

12 Feyzin Refinery France

13 TOTAL Petrochemicals Carling France

14 Leuna Refinery Germany

15 Donges Refinery France

16 Grandpuits Refinery France

17 Etablissement Flandres France

18 Lindsey Oil Refinery UK

19 Zeeland Refinery TheNetherlands

20 TRTF France

21 Port Arthur Refinery US

22 Bayport US

23 La Porte US

24 Houston Central Services US

25 Carville US

26 Samsung TOTAL Petrochemicals DAESAN Korea

27 Dongguan China

28 Samsung construction project Korea

29 Foshan China

30 Ningbo China

31 Singaport Singapore

32 TRTG France

o 220 sites worldwide

o Major sites

Safety Indicators in TOTAL RC

4 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL RC

5

o HSE performance indicators

Leading Indicators

Lagging Indicators

Monthly follow-up of these indicators

o Leading indicators

Number of failures of safety critical systems encountered during inspection, testing or operations

Number of reported substandard conditions/acts

Ratio of reported substandard conditions/acts per employee

Degree of realization of tests of safety critical systems

Number of out of date implementation of works following recommendations of inspection service

Number of excursions of safe operating window

Number of permit violations related to air emissions

Number of permit violations related to water emissions

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL RC

6

o Occupational Safety Lagging Indicators

Total Recordable Injury Rate (own employees + contractors)

Total LossTime Injury Rate (own employees + contractors)

TOTAL number of injuries (with and without loss time cases)

o Process Safety Lagging Indicators

Number of LOPC of hazardous products (Tier1 + Tier2, API754)

Number of fires and explosions

Process Safety Event Rate (Tier 1) (using API754 classification)

Process Safety Event Rate (Tier 2) (using API754 classification)

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Focus of this presentation !

LOPC

7

o A loss of primary containment (LOPC) = accidental, sudden and uncontrolled loss of combustible, flammable, explosive, corrosive, toxic products or products dangerous to the environment whatever steps are taken to confine or collect them or to protect the environment.

o The materials to which this indicator relates are those identified in API 754.

o Examples:

Leaks or releases of liquid and/or gas hydrocarbons or flammable or toxic materials occurring on site from a closed circuit:

• Either directly into the atmosphere (Ex: burst of a pipe, of a seal, rupture of pump seals)

• Or in a collection network (drain network or gutters).

• Or in a secondary containment (storage tank, service station separator).

Opening of pressure relief valves (PRV) to the atmosphere giving way either to liquid carry over, or to discharge to a potential unsafe location, or to a shelter in place or to a public protective measure (road closure)

Break of rupture disks

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Thresholds for reporting

8

o Values in kg/h o The thresholds in Kg/h are corresponding to the quantity released in any one hour period

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Benchmark with CONCAWE data

9 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

CONCAWE

10

o Benchmark study in 2013 was performed by CONCAWE on safety performance of European refineries

o The study represents about 99% of European refining capacity

Occupational safety : 39 sites included in benchmark Process Safety : 33 sites included in benchmark

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

2014

11 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

0.43

1.25

1.68

0.41

1.52

1.93

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 1+Tier 2

Rate (per million hours)

TOTAL Refining 2014

CONCAWE 2013

Benchmark with AFPM data

12 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

AFPM Benchmark

13

o Process Safety Events (PSE) survey based on information collected per ANSI/API Recommended Practice 754

o 113 refining facilities (representing 96.4% of the total US operable refining capacity) participated in the survey

o 123 petrochemical facilities participated in the survey

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

1.93

1.32

1.74

1.87

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

TOTAL Refining, 2014 TOTAL RP, 2014 AFPM 2013, Refining AFPM 2013, Petrochemicals

Rat

e (p

er

mil

lio

n h

ou

rs)

14

AFPM Benchmark. Tier1 + Tier2 rates.

Performance of RP in 2014 within AFPM benchmark for refineries and petrochemical installations

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Benchmark with GBG/API data

15 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Benchmarking with GBG data (2012)

16

A - Mechanical failure 1 - Fixed Equipment Inspection

Technical cause (sudden failure) (failure while operating within design enveloppe) 2 - Equipment Reliability

3 - Design

B - Process failure 4 - Change Management

(failure because of operation out of design enveloppe) 5 - Operating Limits

Organisational cause (inadequate operation) C - Inadequate operation preparation 6 - Procedures

7 - Risk Assessment

8 - Safe Work Practices

D -Inadequate practices 9 - Work Monitoring

10 - Communication

Human related cause

E - Other human related cause 11 - Knowledge and Skills

12 - Human Factors

Other F - Other 13 -Other

Classification of accident causes according to API & GBG

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

29.7 29.3

24.722.9

45.747.8

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

GBG 2012, Tier 1 TOTAL RC, LOPC ( 2012-2014)

Pe

rce

nt

Technical causes

Organisational causes

Human related causes

Benchmarking with GBG data

17

GBG data : Refining Industry 2012 (6 Majors) Analysis of 70 LOPC events

TOTAL RC data : Analysis of 57 LOPC HiPo events (excl. fires/explosions) in 2012-2014

Profile of LOPC events in TOTAL RC is similar to the profile of LOPC events in GBG

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

Benchmarking with GBG data, evolution 2012-> 2014

18

29.7

23.7

30.9 31.4

24.726.3

20.6

23.5

45.7

50.048.5

45.1

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

GBG 2012, Tier 1 TOTAL RC 2012, LOPC TOTAL RC 2013, LOPC TOTAL RC 2014, LOPC

Pe

rce

nt

Technical causes

Organisational causes

Human related causes

Most LOPC are related to organizational issues and human factors issues

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

2.5

11.5

8.3

1.9

5.1

7.0

15.9

14.6

10.2

2.5

8.3

12.1

5.0

9.0

9.0

2.0

0.0

7.0

13.0

10.0

12.0

2.0

5.0

12.0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Fixed Equipment Inspection

Equipment Reliability

Design

Change Management

Operating Limits

Procedures

Risk Assessment

Safe Work Practices

Work Monitoring

Communication

Knowledge and Skills

Human Factors

Percent

Analysis of TOTAL RC data (LOPC, 2012-2014)

19

Human related

Organization

Technical

GBG 2012 data

50% of all LOPC are related to: • Knowledge & skills • Safe work practices • Supervision • Risk assessment

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

2.5

11.5

8.3

1.9

5.1

7.0

15.9

14.6

10.2

2.5

8.3

12.1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Fixed Equipment Inspection

Equipment Reliability

Design

Change Management

Operating Limits

Procedures

Risk Assessment

Safe Work Practices

Work Monitoring

Communication

Knowledge and Skills

Human Factors

Percent

Action Plan

20

Development & implementation of

Safety Culture Program

Review and effective application of work

permit systems

Full implementation of RC Maestro requirements

Integration of technical integrity activities &

programs

Full implementation of Safety Management System requirements

Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015

21 Use of Process Safety Performance Indicators in TOTAL Refining & Chemicals Antwerpen, 22 January 2015