Upload
others
View
15
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
USDA Agricultural Biotechnology Research
Peter Burfening, Ph.D.National Program Leader, Animal Genome Program
National Research InitiativeCSREES, USDA
Agricultural BiotechnologyA range of tools, including traditional breeding techniques, that alter living organisms, or parts of organisms, to make or modify products; improve plants or animals; or develop microorganisms for specific agricultural uses. Modern biotechnology today includes the tools of genetic engineering.
http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?contentidonly=true&navid=AGRICULTURE&contentid=BiotechnologyGlosary.xml
Agricultural BiotechnologyA set of biological techniques developed through basic research and now applied to research and product development. Biotechnology refers to the use of recombinant DNA, cell fusion, and new bioprocessing techniques.
http://www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/biotech/res/biotechnology_res_glossary.html
World Food SituationCirca 1965
• In the late 1960s, famine was a serious threat in Asia.
• Professor Paul Ehrlich shocked the world in his 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb.– “The battle to feed all of humanity is over,"– "In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of
people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now."
• Clearly these predictions didn’t happen!
Changes in World Grain Production• 1950 the world produced 692 million tons of grain
for 2.2 billion people; by 1992 production was 1.9 billion tons for 5.6 billion people -- 2.8 times the grain for 2.2 times the population.
• 1950 grain output of 692 million tons came from 1.7 billion acres of cropland, the 1992 output of 1.9 billion tons from 1.73 billion acres -- 170 % increase from one percent more land.
• From 1965 to 1990 the globe's daily per capita intake grew from 2,063 calories to 2,495, with an increased proportion as protein.
Impact of Agricultural Research on Americans
Impact of Agricultural Research on Americans
Trends in Food Expenditures as a Share of Disposable Personal Income
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2006
Percen
t
Away From Home
At Home
Trends in U.S. Milk Production
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
No.
Dairy
Cow
s (tho
usan
ds)
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
Tot
al M
ilk P
rodu
ction
(Millions
Pou
nds)In 2007 U.S. Produced 34%
more milk with 48% fewer dairy cows than in 1960
12000
16000
20000
24000
28000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Poun
ds o
f Milk
(1st
Lac
)
Year
Milk Production Increases Due To Improved Breeding Selection
↑ 92%
2001 Males
Day 43 Day 57 Day 71 Day 85
1957 MalesBROILERS
Havenstein and Qureshi, 2004
Trends in U.S. Corn Production
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Acr
age
Har
vest
ed (
thou
sand
acr
es)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Tota
l Pro
duct
ion
(mill
ion
bush
els)
U.S. Produced 235% more CornOn 23% more acres
USDA Research Organization
• Research, Education and Economics (REE)– Agricultural Research Service (ARS)– Cooperative State Research, Education and
Extension Service (CSREES)– Economic Research Service (ERS)– National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS)• US Forest Service (USFS)
ARS Mission• ARS conducts research to develop and
transfer solutions to agricultural problems of high national priority and provide information access and dissemination to: – ensure high-quality, safe food, and other
agricultural products – assess the nutritional needs of Americans – sustain a competitive agricultural economy – enhance the natural resource base and the
environment, and – provide economic opportunities for rural citizens,
communities, and society as a whole.
ARS
• USDA’s primary intramural (in-house) research organization– $1.1 billion fiscal year 2007 budget– 2,100 scientists – 6,000 other employees – 100 research locations including a few in
other countries– 1,200 research projects within 22 National
Programs
Livestock and Range Research Laboratory
• Fort Keogh was established by Congress as an Army Calvary post on July 22, 1876, approximately one month after the Battle of the Little Bighorn
• In 1907, all infantry troops were withdrawn• In 1909 it was designated a Remount Station. During
this period, more horses were processed here than at any other army post in the U. S. Horses were shipped worldwide.
• In 1922 all military personnel were withdrawn and in 1924, Congress transferred Fort Keogh to the USDA for the purpose of conducting agricultural research.
Livestock and Range Research Laboratory
• Fort Keogh is a 55,000 acre rangeland beef cattle research facility– 22 USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
employees• 8 scientists; 2 geneticists, 2 reproductive physiologists, 1
range animal nutritionist, and 3 rangeland scientists– Operated in cooperation with the Montana
Agricultural Experiment Station• 20 Montana Agricultural Experiment Station employees
paid from state funds generated by livestock sales• 1 State beef cattle extension specialists
Soybean/maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research Unit
• Acquire, characterize, evaluate, maintain, utilize, and distribute germplasm accessions in the genus Glycine
• Identify genes controlling traits of economic importance in soybean including seed yield, seed composition and disease resistance
• Investigate soybean genomic responses to microbial interactions
• Determine the genetic variability of soybean fungal pathogens
• Acquire, maintain, develop, evaluate and distribute genetic and cytogenetic stocks of maize
• Evaluate induction and characterize regulatory components of gene expression in maize in response to anaerobic stress.
National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation
• Conserves genetic resources of crops and animals important to U.S. agriculture and landscapes.
• Both a storage and research facility– Plant Germplasm Preservation Research
• Developing strategies and technologies to preserve plant geneticdiversity in ex situ genebanks
– National Animal Germplasm Program • Coordinate the availability, conservation and utilization of animal
and aquatic genetic resources in order to provide optimum accessto desirable genes and gene complexes that will contribute to the future food and fiber supply
CSREES• USDA’s primary extra-mural (outside of
USDA) research organization– Unique mission is to advance knowledge for
agriculture, the environment, human health and well-being, and communities by supporting research, education, and extension programs in the Land-Grant University System and other partner organizations.
– CSREES doesn't perform actual research, education, and extension but rather helps fund it at the state and local level.
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
CSREES• CSREES' two key mechanisms for
accomplishing its mission of "advancing knowledge" are: – National program leadership. We help states
identify and meet research, extension, and education priorities in areas of public concern that affect agricultural producers, small business owners, youth and families, and others.
– Federal assistance. Provides annual formula grants to land-grant universities and competitively granted funds to researchers in land-grant and other universities.
CSREES• Federal Assistance
– Competitive Funding. Awarded based upon the recommendations of peer review panels. CSREES requests proposals, and a panel of subject-matter experts reviews each proposal and prioritizes projects for funding.
– Formula Grants. Provides support for research and extension activities at land-grant institutions through federal funds that are appropriated to the states on the basis of statutory formulas.
– Congressionally Directed Funding (earmarks). Each year Congress directs CSREES to fund and administer certain state or commodity-specific programs
Sources of CSREES FY 2008 Funding($ x103)
Higher Education, $38,791, 3%
Integrated Grants, $41,990, 4%
Outreach to Socially Disadvantaged Farmers,
$6,395, 1%
Formula Extension, $310,510, 26%
National Research Initiative, $190,883, 16%
Tribal Colleges Endowment Fund , $15,089, 1%
Other: non-competitive, $221,514, 18%
Special Research Grants, $107,088, 9%
Formula Research, $266,625, 22%
Not Included• SBIR ($18,000)• Biotech Risk ($3,000)
Competitively awarded,
$278,059, 23%Non-Competitively Funded, $935,885,
77%
Sources of CSREES FY 2008 Funding($ x103)
Not Including• SBIR ($18,000)• Biotech Risk ($3,000)
National Research Initiative (NRI) Competitive Grants Program
• USDA’s Primary Competitive Grants program
• FY 07 budget of $190,000,000• Supports both Fundamental (60%) and
Mission Oriented (40%) research• Supports scientists at all academic
institutions, Federal research agencies, private and industrial organizations, and as individuals
Agriculture and Food Research Initiative
National Research Initiative (NRI) Competitive Grants Program 2007• Agricultural Genomics and Biosecurity
– 155 projects totaling $64,800,948• Agricultural Production and Value-added
Processing– 130 projects totaling $38,397,491
• Agroecosystems and Rural Prosperity– 91 projects totaling $29,595,434
• Nutrition, Food Safety and Quality– Supported 75 projects totaling $31,579,004
• Total of 451 projects totaling $164,372,877
National Research Initiative (NRI) Competitive Grants Program 2007
% of GrantsType of Institution
77.6Land-Grant university
8.3Public non-land grant university
5.3Private college/university
3.3Private research
5.1Federal (primarily ARS)
0.4Individual/other
Land-Grant Universities (LGU)
• CSREES primary partner in conducting it research, extension and education mission
Land Grant Universities• 1862 -- the Federal Government granted federally
owned land (hence the name “land-grant”) to each state for the development of a university that would serve the citizens of the state in the areas of research, education, and extension.
• 1892 -- congress appropriated research funding to land-grant universities (State Ag. Experiment Stations) based on a formula.
• 1914 -- Extension was formalized, with the Smith-Lever Act which established the partnership between the agricultural colleges and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to provide for cooperative agricultural extension work
Land-Grant Universities• Research programs generally focus on state and/or
regional priorities rather than national problems• Scientist generally have split appointments• Scientist are supported by multiple funding sources
and can compete for funding from many agencies– AES both state appropriated dollars and formula– NRI– NSF– NIH– DOD– Etc.
ARS - LGU collaborations• Many ARS laboratories are located on LGU
campuses• Almost all ARS scientist have adjunct
appointments in the LGU system• Some ARS scientist are embedded in LGU
departments• LGU scientist collaborate with ARS scientists
and work on ARS research locations• LGU and ARS scientists serve on graduate
student committees and some ARS scientist chair graduate student committees
ARS - LGU collaborations• ARS and LGU scientist serve on multi-
state research and extension committees together
• ARS and LGU scientists often jointly plan and fund research efforts
• ARS and CSREES hold joint national stakeholder workshops to help prioritize research and extension efforts
Summary• USDA supported research has a long history
of significant accomplishments contributing to solving national and world food and agricultural problems
• Scientists at ARS and Land-Grant universities work both independently and collaboratively to solve present and future problems.
• USDA has a variety of funding mechanisms to accomplish their goals
• Biotechnology in the broadest sense is an integral part of most of USDA’s current and future research portfolio.
Thank youand any
Questions?
I am sure many of our producers are wondering how BIOTECHNOLOGY will
affect their future