Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    1/68

    Filed on behalf of: Unified Patents Inc.

    By: P. Andrew Riley

    Joshua D. Goldberg

    Kai Rajan

    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,

    Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.

    901 New York Avenue, NW

    Washington, DC 200014413

    Telephone: 202-408-4000

    Email: [email protected]

    Jonathan Stroud

    Unified Patents Inc.

    1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 10

    Washington, D.C., 20009Telephone: 202-805-8931

    Email: [email protected]

    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

    ____________

    BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

    ____________

    UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,

    Petitioner

    v.

    CONVERGENT MEDIA SOLUTIONS, LLC,

    Patent Owner

    ____________

    IPR2016-00047Patent 8,640,183

    Method and Apparatus for Browsing Using Alternative Linkbases

    ____________

    PETITION FORINTER PARTESREVIEW OF U.S. PATENT 8,640,183

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    2/68

    ii

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1

    II. MANDATORY NOTICES ....................................................................... 2

    A. Real Party-in-Interest ....................................................................................... 2

    B. Related Matters ................................................................................................. 2

    C. Lead and Back-Up Counsel, and Service Information............................. 3

    III. FEE PAYMENT ....................................................................................... 3

    IV. STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED .......................... 3

    A.

    Claims for Which Review Is Requested...................................................... 3

    B. Statutory Grounds of Challenge .................................................................... 3

    C. The Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art at the Time of the

    Claimed Invention ............................................................................................ 4

    V. THE 183 PATENT .................................................................................. 4

    A. Overview of the Disclosure ............................................................................ 4

    B. Prosecution History .......................................................................................... 5

    VI. GROUNDS FOR STANDING ................................................................. 6

    VII. STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED FOREACH CLAIM CHALLENGED .............................................................. 6

    A. Claims for Which Review is Requested...................................................... 6

    B. Statutory Grounds of Challenge .................................................................... 7

    C. Claim Construction .......................................................................................... 7

    Unified Media Selection and Presentation User1.

    Interface ................................................................................................ 7

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    3/68

    iii

    VIII. CLAIMS 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 OFTHE 183 PATENT ARE UNPATENTABLE UNDER 35 U.S.C. 103(a) ...................................................................................................... 9

    A. Chenis Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) ............................................... 9

    B. Elabbadyis Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) ....................................... 9

    C. Meade is Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) ............................................ 9

    D. Ground 1: Chenin view ofElabbadyrenders claims 1-5, 16,

    18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 obvious.................... 9

    Implementation of Chens Second Computerized Device1.

    Set ........................................................................................................... 14

    Implementation of Chens Discovery Protocol............................162.

    E. Ground 2:Meadein view ofElabbadyrenders claims 1, 16, 18,

    24, 32, 33, 37, 38, 41, 55, 58, 59, and 60 obvious...................................37

    Implementation ofMeades Second Computerized1.

    Device Set .............................................................................................40

    Implementation ofMeades Discovery Protocol.........................422.

    Implementation ofMeades Resource Indicator..........................44

    3.

    IX. CONCLUSION....................................................................................... 60

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    4/68

    iv

    TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

    Page(s)

    Cases

    Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. AT&T Inc.,

    3-15-cv-02156 (N.D. Tex.) .................................................................................. 2

    Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. Hulu, Inc.,

    3-15-cv-02158 (N.D. Tex.) .................................................................................. 2

    Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. Netflix Inc.,

    3-15-cv-02160 (N.D. Tex.) .................................................................................. 2

    Phillips v. AWH Corp.,

    415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc) ............................................................ 7

    Federal Statutes

    35 U.S.C. 103(a) ............................................................................................. 4, 7, 9

    35 U.S.C. 311 ......................................................................................................3, 7

    Regulations

    37 C.F.R. 42.8(b)(1) ................................................................................................ 2

    37 C.F.R. 42.15(a) ................................................................................................... 3

    37 C.F.R. 42.100(b) ................................................................................................7

    37 C.F.R. 42.103(a) ................................................................................................. 3

    37 C.F.R. 42.104(a) .................................................................................................6

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    5/68

    v

    LIST OF EXHIBITS

    Exhibit Description

    EX1001 U.S. Patent No. 8,640,183 B2 to Richard Reisman

    EX1002 Declaration of Jon Weissman, Ph.D.EX1003 U.S. Patent No. 8,479,238 B2 to Chen, et al. (Chen)

    EX1004 U.S. Patent No. 7,483,958 B1 to Elabbady, et al. (Elabbady)

    EX1005 U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0073412 to William

    K. Meade, II (Meade)

    EX1006 Merriam-Websters Collegiate Dictionary (10th ed. 2000) (definition

    of unified)

    EX1007 Excerpts of Prosecution History for U.S. Patent No. 8,640,183

    EX1008 Petitioners Voluntary Interrogatory Responses

    EX1009 Microsoft Computer Dictionary (5th ed. 2002) (definitions of

    UPnP and URL)

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    6/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    1

    I. INTRODUCTION

    Petitioner Unified Patents Inc. (Unified) requests Inter Partes Review

    (IPR) of claims 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 of

    U.S. Patent No. 8,640,183 (the 183 patent) assigned to Convergent Media

    Solutions, LLC (Convergent) (EX1001).

    The 183 patent, which has a filing date of October 26, 2012 and a priority

    date of May 10, 2002, describes systems and methods for navigating hypermedia

    using multiple coordinated input/output device sets. EX1001 at Abstract. The 183

    patent suggests that it uniquely fills gaps in interactive media control, id. at

    1:30-35, 2:63-3:4, by providing user interfaces for controlling what resources (e.g.

    media) are presented on which device sets.Id.at 3:15-20.

    Technologies that enable media selection and device selection were well-

    known in the art. The claimed first and second computerized device sets are

    devices such as a television and personal digital assistant, respectivelyelectronic

    devices that have been used for decades. As the 183 patent concedes, innovators

    since the 1990s focused on converging television and computer technologies. Id.

    at 1:30-32. Other facets of the 183 patent, such as discovery information and

    resource indicators, are known in Universal Plug and Play and networked media

    systems. Indeed, the 183 patent specification concedes that aspects of the claims

    are based on known standards and prior art systems. See e.g., id.at 37:46-55. Thus,

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    7/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    2

    technologies that enable selecting media for presentation on another device were

    well-known prior to the application for the 183 patent and its priority date.

    Years before the 183 patents effective filing date, a myriad of prior art

    patents and printed publications disclosed the claimed combination of elements. As

    this petition demonstrates, the disclosures of Chen(EX1003),Elabbady(EX1004),

    andMeade(EX1005), among other patents and publications, warrant cancellation

    of claims 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61.

    II.

    MANDATORY NOTICES

    A.

    Real Party-in-Interest

    Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.8(b)(1), Petitioner certifies that Unified is the real

    party-in-interest, and further certifies that no other party exercised control or could

    exercise control over Unifieds participation in this proceeding, the filing of this

    petition, or the conduct of any ensuing trial. In this regard, Unified has submitted

    voluntary discovery. See EX1008 (Petitioners Voluntary Interrogatory

    Responses).

    B. Related Matters

    Upon information and belief, the 183 patent was asserted in the following

    cases: Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. AT&T Inc., 3-15-cv-02156 (N.D. Tex.),

    Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. Hulu, Inc., 3-15-cv-02158 (N.D. Tex.), and

    Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. Netflix Inc., 3-15-cv-02160 (N.D. Tex.).

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    8/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    3

    C. Lead and Back-Up Counsel, and Service Information

    The signature block of this petition designates lead counsel, backup counsel,

    and service information for each petitioner. Unified designates P. Andrew Riley

    (Reg. No. 66,290) as lead counsel and designates Joshua L. Goldberg (Reg. No.

    59,369) and Kai Rajan (Reg. No. 70,110) as backup counsel. All can be reached at

    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, 901 New York Avenue,

    NW, Washington, DC 20001-4413 (phone: 202.408.4000; fax: 202.408.4400).

    Unified also designates as backup counsel Jonathan Stroud (Reg. No. 72,518).

    Petitioner consents to e-mail service at [email protected].

    III.

    FEE PAYMENT

    The required fees are submitted under 37 C.F.R. 42.103(a) and 42.15(a).

    If any additional fees are due during this proceeding, the Office may charge such

    fees to Deposit Account No. 060916.

    IV. STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED

    A.

    Claims for Which Review Is Requested

    Petitioner requests IPR and cancellation of claims 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38,

    40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 of the 183 patent under 35 U.S.C. 311.

    B.

    Statutory Grounds of Challenge

    Petitioner requests that the Board hold claims 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-

    42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 unpatentable as follows:

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    9/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    4

    Ground Proposed Statutory Rejections for the 183 Patent Exhibit No(s).

    1

    Claims 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55,

    and 58-61 are obvious under 103(a) over U.S. Patent

    No. 8,479,238 to Chen, et al. (Chen) in view of U.S.

    Patent No. 7,483,958 to Elabbady, et al. (Elabbady).

    EX1003,

    EX1004

    2

    Claims 1, 16, 18, 24, 32, 33, 37, 38, 41, 58, 59, and 60

    are obvious under 103(a) over U.S. Patent

    Application Publication No. 2003/0073412 to William

    K. Meade, II (Meade) in view ofElabbady.

    EX1005, EX

    1004

    C. The Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art at the Time of the Claimed

    Invention

    The 183 patent claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No.

    60/379635, filed May 10, 2002. At that time, a person having ordinary skill in the

    art (hereafter, POSA) of hypermedia browsing and control (i.e., in the art for the

    183 patent) would have (i) a B.S. degree in computer engineering, computer

    science, or equivalent training, and (ii) approximately two years of experience or

    research related to computer networking. SeeEX1002 at 23.

    V.

    THE 183 PATENT

    A.

    Overview of the Disclosure

    The 183 patent describes systems and methods for navigating hypermedia

    using multiple coordinated input/output device sets. EX1001 at Abstract. The

    device sets may include personal computing (PC) devices such as Personal Digital

    Assistants (PDAs), and televisions (TVs).Id. at 16:28-43, 19:32-47.

    Hypermedia may include any kind of media that may have the effect of a

    non-linear structure of associated elements, and includes graphics, video, and

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    10/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    5

    sound.Id.at 7:13-22. Notably, none of the claims require or recite hypermedia.

    Instead, the claims recite continuous media, which broadly encompasses any

    representation of content elements that have an intrinsic duration, that continue

    (or extend) and may change over time, including one or more of audio data,

    video data, animation, virtual reality data, hybrid natural and synthetic video

    data, including both stored format and streams or streaming transmission

    formats.Id. at 20:5-12.

    B.

    Prosecution History

    The application was filed on October 26, 2012, EX1007 at 160-510, and

    claimed the priority of multiple non-provisional and provisional applications, the

    earliest of which was U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/379,635, filed on May

    10, 2002.Id.at 460. Thus, the 183 patent may have an effective filing date of May

    10, 2002, pending full support in the provisional application.

    The Examiner opened prosecution in June of 2013, by restricting the original

    three claims. EX1007 at 123-128. In response, Applicant cancelled one claim, and

    added 61 new claims to the remaining two claims. Id. at 94-117. Nearly 60 of the

    new claims were distinct and did not have overlapping or duplicate subject matter.

    The Examiner conducted a brief search, unnecessarily confined to class 725, for

    words within the specification, and not for prior art. Id. at 47-48 (Ref. Nos. S1-S9).

    In September of 2013, the Examiner proposed claim amendments during an

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    11/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    6

    Examiner-initiated interview (EX1007 at 36), and then mailed a Notice of

    Allowance on September 18, 2013. Id. at 18-35. In the Examiners Amendment,

    the Examiner failed to cancel dependent claims that recited the same elements as

    those incorporated into the independent claims, such as dependent claims 46 and

    47. More remarkable, the Examiner never rejected any of the claims. In the Notice

    of Allowance, the Examiner declined to identify the allowable aspects of the

    claims, and instead vaguely stated that [t]he prior art of record fails to neither (sic)

    disclose nor sufficiently suggest the combination of features as claimed and

    arranged by applicant.Id.at 34.

    VI. GROUNDS FOR STANDING

    Petitioner certifies that the 183 patent is available for IPR and that the

    Petitioner is not barred or estopped from requesting IPR challenging the 183

    patent on the grounds identified. See 37 C.F.R. 42.104(a). Specifically: (1)

    Petitioner is not the owner of the 183 patent; (2) Petitioner is not barred or

    estopped from requesting IPR; and (3) Petitioner has not been served with a

    complaint alleging infringement of the 183 patent.

    VII.

    STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED FOR EACH

    CLAIM CHALLENGED

    A. Claims for Which Review is Requested

    Petitioner respectfully requests review under 35 U.S.C. 311 of claims 1-5,

    16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 of the 183 patent, and their

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    12/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    7

    cancellation as unpatentable.

    B. Statutory Grounds of Challenge

    Claims 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 are

    challenged as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 103(a). The claim construction,

    reasons for unpatentability, and specific evidence supporting this request are

    detailed below.

    C. Claim Construction

    Claim terms are given their ordinary and customary meaning as understood

    by a POSA. Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1312-13 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en

    banc). A claim in an unexpired patent subject to inter partes review receives the

    broadest reasonable construction in light of the specification of the patent in

    which it appears. 37 C.F.R. 42.100(b). The majority of the claims are common

    terms that deserve their ordinary and customary meaning. Unified suggests the

    following term from the claims of the 183 patent requires construction.1

    Unified Media Selection and Presentation User Interface1.

    Independent claims 1, 58, 59, and 60 all specify that the first user interface

    and the second user interface together comprise a unified media selection and

    presentation user interface. EX1001 at 164:65-165:1, 169:6-9, 57-60, 140:44-47.

    1The broadest reasonable interpretation should be applied to any claim terms not

    addressed below.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    13/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    8

    The term unified is not defined or even recited anywhere in the specification,

    except in 103:35-42, where the term is used in a different context of unified

    messaging services. The term unified is also not defined anywhere in the

    dependent claims, and only appears in dependent claim 47, which merely

    duplicates elements from independent claim 1. The dictionary definition of

    unified is ma[d]e into a unit or a coherent whole. EX1006. The independent

    claims specify that the unified media selection and presentation user interface

    includes controls for (1) selecting continuous media content and (2) selecting one

    of the first or second computerized device sets for presentation of the continuous

    media content. EX1001, claims 1, 58, 59, 60. Taken in the context of the

    specification and the claims, which are directed to a first and second user interface,

    the phrase unified media selection and

    presentation user interface should be

    construed to mean a coherent set of user

    interfaces for selecting media and selecting

    a presentation device. EX1002 at 26-27. This construction is consistent with

    FIG. 3 of the 183 patent, which shows typical displays and user interface

    display layouts according to certain embodiments of the present invention.

    EX1001 at FIG. 3, 3:37-39. A portion of FIG. 3 illustrates the coherent set of user

    interfaces for selecting media, as used in a personal digital assistant (PDA):

    Portion of 183 Patent

    EX1001), FIG. 3

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    14/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    9

    VIII. CLAIMS 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 OF

    THE 183 PATENT ARE UNPATENTABLE UNDER 35 U.S.C.

    103(a)

    A. Chenis Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e)

    U.S. Patent No. 8,479,238 (EX1003, Chen), filed on May 14, 2002, claims

    priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/290,788, filed on May 14,

    2001. Chen is prior art under at least 35 U.S.C. 102(e) based on at least its

    domestic priority date of May 14, 2001.

    B. Elabbadyis Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e)

    U.S. Patent No. 7,483,958 (EX1004, Elabbady), filed on March 26, 2002,

    claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/278,804, filed on

    March 26, 2001.Elabbady is prior art under at least 35 U.S.C. 102(e) based on at

    least its domestic priority date of March 26, 2001.

    C.

    Meade is Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e)

    U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0073412 (EX1005, Meade),

    filed on October 16, 2001. Meade is prior art under at least 35 U.S.C. 102(e)

    based on its filing date of October 16, 2001.

    D. Ground 1: Chen in view of Elabbady renders claims 1-5, 16, 18,

    24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53, 55, and 58-61 obvious

    Chendiscloses control of multimedia playback, just like the 183 patent.

    See EX1003 Title. FIG. 3 of Chen shows an exemplary network topology

    including a Control Device 212, in communication with a Video Device 218:

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    15/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    10

    EX1004, FIG. 3

    Control Device 212 can include a portable computerized device such as a personal

    digital assistant (PDA) (claim 37) or a tablet computer (claim 40) capable of

    playing multimedia data such as, preferably, still images, text, preview videos, or

    the like. EX1003 at 4:47-60. In Chens system, Control Device 212 serves as a

    dynamic control pad for initiating video playback. Id. Control Device 212

    communicates with other components (such as Video Device 218) via network

    216, which may operate using wireless protocols such as Bluetooth, IEEE,

    802.11b, infrared protocols, or other wireless protocols.Id. at 4:55-58. Network

    216 may include an Internet Protocol (IP) network.Id. at 65-66. 802.11b is known

    as a version of WiFi, to people of ordinary skill in the art (POSA) of wireless data

    networks. EX 1002 at 33.

    Control device 212 includes a display screen that provides multiple user

    interfaces for selecting content and for controlling playback on video device 218.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    16/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    11

    EX1003 at FIGS. 4-10. Chen discloses having more than one video

    device controlled by the [same] control device.Id.at 5:13-14.

    An exemplary graphical user interface displayed on control device 212

    provides multimedia data representing video data for browsing and selection for

    playback. EX1003 at 8:1-10. An example of this

    graphical user interface is illustrated in FIG. 7 of

    Chen (reproduced at the right). Video data

    relative to a search term is displayed, so that the

    consumer can browse available videos, and select

    a particular video from the list. Id. at 4:32-35.

    Represented video data can be stored in a

    centralized video database, or stored locally and

    proximate to the video device 218.Id. at 5:31-32,

    7:66-:810. Represented video data can include

    videos encoded according to a standard such as

    the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)a

    type of encoded video.Id. at 3:35-38; EX1002 at

    35.

    In addition to displaying a listing of

    multimedia programs, the user interface displayed

    EX1003, FIG. 7

    EX1003, portion of FIG. 4

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    17/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    12

    on the control device 212 includes multimedia content data based on the content of

    the video data. EX1003 at 3:21-29. The multimedia content data can include still

    images, preview videos, and detailed information about the video data.Id.

    A consumer may select a particular video data (such as a television program)

    for playback, from the displayed multimedia data.Id. at 8:3-10.

    Prior to selecting the video data, control device 212 may display another

    exemplary graphical user interface to allow the user to specify a video device for

    viewing multimedia. EX1003 at FIG. 4 (reproduced to the right). A single control

    device 212 may control multiple video devices.Id.at 5:13-14.

    Control device 212 displays the user interfaces illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 8

    as part of a coherent set of user interfaces for selecting media for playback and for

    selecting a presentation device, and thus Chendiscloses a unified media selection

    and presentation interface. See EX1002 at 39.

    Video device 218 may include a television (claims 38, 41) or computer

    monitor that plays video. EX1003 at 5:4-5. Video device 218 is capable of

    decoding compressed video data, including MPEG video (claim 42). Video device

    218 communicates with the system, including with control device 212, using a

    wireless connection with sufficient bandwidth to support playback of digital video

    data. Id. at 5:5-9. Chen discloses storing multiple versions of the video data in

    various formats, so that the highest possible quality version may be delivered and

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    18/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    13

    played on a video device. The video quality is determined based on the capability

    of the video device 218 to receive the video data, including the available

    bandwidth for the video device and the video device capabilities.Id. at 3:38-42.

    Chen discloses using a protocol similar to an Address Resolution Protocol

    (ARP) to discover nearby devices and determine which video devices 218 are

    active and capable of receiving and playing video. EX1003, at 7:13-25. When a

    user accesses the user interface shown in FIG. 4 (reproduced above), the control

    device 212 provides a list of available video devices to which the consumer has

    access.Id.The consumer inputs a selection of an available video device, and the

    selected video device receives selected video data to begin playback.Id.at 7:4-25.

    After the consumer selects a playback video device and then selects the video data,

    control device 212 generates and transmits URLs (claim 55) to the video device

    218.Id.at 6:43-54. The generated URL can include a MediaURL and other

    parameters which facilitate retrieval of the video data for playback on the selected

    video device 218.Id. Control device 212 and video device 218 communicate over

    network 216, which uses wireless protocols such as Bluetooth (claim 33), IEEE, or

    WiFi (claim 32), which are types of packet networks. EX1003 at 4:55-58; EX1002

    at 41. Control device 212 also communicates with a video server 220 to assist the

    video device 218 with retrieving the desired video data for playback. EX1003at

    5:58-62. Video server 220 may be located remotely from the premises, and

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    19/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    14

    communicate with video device 218 and control device 212 using a Wide Area

    Network (WAN) that routes packets between devices.Id. at 5:31-38. The Internet

    is a common type of Wide Area Network, and thus the video device 218 and

    control device 212 may communicate over the Internet with video server 220,

    acting as a web server. EX 1002 at 41.

    During playback, the video data is presented on the video device 218, and

    the control device 212 provides a user interface for soliciting consumer

    input/instructions to control video playback. EX1003 at 6:40-50. Using the

    interface, the consumer can control parameters including volume, play, stop, and

    pause (claim 25), for example.Id. at 6:58-67. Video server 220 may be included in

    an implementation of Chens system that provides media content distribution

    services such as network-based, video-on-demand entertainment and information

    services. EX1003 at 9:12-18.

    Implementation of Chens Second Computerized Device Set1.

    As explained above, Chen discloses a control device such as a PDA that

    browses video data and plays videos. EX1003 at 3:24-26, 4:50-53. To the extent

    that the control device in Chen does not present MPEG encoded video data,

    Elabbady discloses this element.

    Elabbady, like Chen and the 183 patent, discloses a media browsing and

    playback system having a first device 202 and other devices 206a-d. EX1004 at

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    20/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    15

    5:24-31. Like Chen, first device 202 in Elabbady is a PDA that provides a media

    catalog for a user to select media content for playback. Id. at 9:53-60. Elabbady

    also teaches that first device 202 PDA can play media content such as video. Id. at

    3:33-46, 5:66-6:3, 7:3-8, 8:57-62. Thus, Elabbady recognizes that a PDA is a

    media processing device and that it has an ordinary function of playing media

    content such as video.Id.

    It would have been obvious to modify Chens control device PDA to provide

    functionality to present encoded video data. EX1002 at 45. Such a modification

    would combine known elements and functionsi.e., modifying control device 202

    to include a functionality that was known and commonly implemented in PDAs at

    the time of Chens invention. Furthermore, both Chen andElabbady are analogous

    references in the same art of media browsing and playback. Id. Moreover, the

    combination of Chen and Elabbady is obvious because it would provide a more

    desirable system, one where multiple media browsing devices also have the ability

    to playback selected data, using devices and functionalities that were well-known

    at the time of Chens invention.Id.

    Therefore, it would have been obvious to POSA to modify Chens control

    device 212 PDA with Elabbadys first device 202 having video data playback

    capability. POSA would have had a reasonable likelihood of success when

    combining the two because the PDAs in both systems are ordinary, common

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    21/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    16

    PDAs, and the implementation of a known function would have been

    straightforward and predictable. EX1002 at 46.

    Implementation of Chens Discovery Protocol2.

    As discussed above, Chen discloses an interface that presents a list of

    available video devices. EX1003 at 7:13-25. To do this, Chen teaches using a

    protocol similar to an Address Resolution Protocol (ARP)a type of discovery

    protocol to identify nearby video devices.Id., EX1002 at 47. To the extent that

    Chens ARP protocol is not a discovery protocol that is implemented at a

    communication layer above an internet protocol layer,Elabbady teaches these

    elements.

    Like Chen, Elabbady discloses locally networked devices that browse and

    play video data.Elabbady discloses devices 202 (which can be a PDA),206, and

    300 (which can televisions) connected via network 204. EX1004 at 5:23-31, 9:56-

    60. One implementation of Elabbadys network 204 uses a Universal Plug-and-

    play (UPnP) protocol (claim 16) that connects devices 202 and 206 and connects

    devices 202 and 300. Id. at 5:54-65, 10:11-16. Similar to the ARP protocol in

    Chen, Elabbadys UPnP provides for device collaboration and communication in

    network 204 in a peer-to-peer manner with zero-configuration networking, to

    configure devices that were previously not connected (claim 18).Id. The UPnP

    protocol is implemented in a communication layer that is above an internet

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    22/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    17

    protocol layer. EX1002 at 48. Notably, claim 16 of the 183 patent specifies that

    the discovery protocol is performed at least partially in accordance with a

    universal plug and play (UPnP) protocol, and, therefore, Elabbadys UPnP

    protocol meets the discovery protocol of the claims. Indeed, UPnP is a known

    mechanism for devices to discover and connect to other devices and to enumerate

    the characteristics of those devices. EX1009.

    It would have been obvious to modify Chens determination of available

    video devices with Elabbadys UPnP discovery protocol to provide zero-

    configuration networking of Chens control and video devices. EX1002 at 49.

    Such a modification would merely replace one technique for identifying available

    devicesARPwith another known technique for identifying available devices

    UPnP. As illustrated in Chen and Elabbady, both techniques are known to POSA

    for identifying available devices in a network that are capable of receiving and

    playing video data.Id.Furthermore, UPnP is intended to be an element of home

    networking, in which PCs, appliances, and the services they provide are linked

    together. EX1009. Thus, the combination of Chen andElabbady would have been

    obvious because Elabbady substitutes one known technique for another, and

    provides predictable, if not equivalent, results. EX1002 at 49.

    As further explained in the chart below,2 the combination of Chen and

    2All emphasis in the claim charts in this petition is added unless otherwise noted.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    23/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    18

    Elabbadyteach all elements of claims 1-5, 16, 18, 24-26, 32-38, 40-42, 49, 51-53,

    55, and 58-61 of the 183 patent.3

    [1.P] 1. A method

    for use in a

    second

    computerized

    device set which

    is configured for

    wireless

    communication

    using a wireless

    communications

    protocol thatenables wireless

    communication

    with a first

    computerized

    device set,

    wherein the first

    and second

    computerized

    device setsinclude respective

    first and second

    continuous media

    players, the

    method

    comprising:

    Chen discloses a control device 212 (the claimed second

    device set) that may be a PDA that plays media including

    preview videos, and a video device 218 (the claimed first

    device set) that may be a television or computer monitor that

    plays video. Control device 212 and video device 218

    communicate over network 216 which uses wireless protocols

    such as Bluetooth, WiFi, or infrared.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 4:46-53: [A] control

    device 212 communicates via a network access point 214

    over a network 216. The control device acts as a dynamiccontrol pad for initiating video playback of content specific

    information and may be a suitably programmed Personal

    Digital Assistant (PDA) device. The control device is capable

    of inputting control command, communicating data, and

    playing multimedia data such as, preferably, still images, text,

    preview videos, or the like. See also id. at 4:55-58: The

    control device utilizes wireless data communications and may

    employ Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11b, infrared protocols, or other

    wireless protocols, to establish communication with thenetwork access point. See also id. at 5:4-9: a video device

    218 is located at the consumer premises 210. The video

    device can decode compressed digital video data and may be

    a television monitor, computer monitor, or the similar device

    for display video data. The video device communicates with

    the network using compatible protocols, as is known in the

    art. See also id. at 5:9-12: The video device may

    communicate with the network through a wireless connection

    that has sufficient bandwidth to support the playback of

    compressed digital video data.

    3The chart does not explicitly address claims 16, 18, 32, 33, 37, 38, and 40-42.

    Those claims are explicitly addressed in the discussion above.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    24/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    19

    [1.A] making

    available to a user

    a first user

    interface that

    allows the user to

    select a

    continuous media

    content to be

    presented to the

    user, wherein the

    continuous media

    content includes a

    set of encoded

    video data;

    Chen discloses a user interface that allows selection of

    multimedia content including MPEG encoded video data.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 7:60-62: [A] control

    device screen of multimedia data indicating video data

    relevant to a particular search term. See also id. at 8:3-10:

    The display of this multimedia data conveys a summary or

    condensed representation pertaining to the content of the

    video data for browsing and serves as a dynamic control pad

    for initiating of video data playback. The consumer then

    selects a particular video data (e.g., a television program) of

    interest from this displayed list of condensed representations

    pertaining to the content of the video data. See also id. 3:36-

    38 - video data may be stored in a format such as MPEG-1,

    MPEG-2, MPEG-4, or other formats and delivered across thenetwork at various bitrates.

    [1.B] making

    available to the

    user a second

    user interface that

    allows the user to

    select to have the

    continuous media

    content presentedon either one of

    the first

    computerized

    device set and the

    second

    computerized

    device set;

    Chen discloses a user interface displayed on control device

    212 (such as a PDA), that allows for a selection of video data

    for playback on a selected video device 218 of multiple

    available video devices.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at FIG. 4; 4:47-53:

    The control device acts as a dynamic control pad for

    initiating video playback of content specificinformation and may be a suitably programmed

    Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) device. The control

    device is capable of inputting control command,

    communicating data, and playing multimedia data such

    as, preferably, still images, text, preview videos, or the

    like. See also id. at 7:5-7: The control device

    provides an input field 410 for the consumer to specify

    the video device that is to be controlled. See also id. at

    5:13-14: There may be more than one video device

    that may be controlled by the control device.

    Elabbady discloses multiple networked devices such as first

    device 202 (such as a PDA) and other device 206 (such as a

    television).Elabbady teaches both PDA 202 and television

    206 being capable of playing the same media content.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    25/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    20

    For example, see EX1004 (Elabbady) at 3:33-46: The

    methods and systems may also be implemented, for example,

    using various media processing devices such as desktop

    computing devices, notebook computing devices, tablet

    computing devices, hand-held computing devices, personal

    digital assistant (PDA) devices, electronic paper devices,

    electronic book devices, wearable computing devices, digital

    audio receiver (DAR) devices, digital audio player devices,

    digital audio recording devices, automobile-based media

    player devices, digital television devices, digital video player

    devices, digital versatile disc (DVD) player devices; set top

    box devices, digital video receiver devices, digital video

    recording devices, wireless communication devices, and the

    like. See also id. at 8:57-62: With attention once again to

    FIG. 2A, devices 206b and 206c are representative of mediacontent playing devices. It should be noted, however, that one

    or more of devices 202, 206a and 206d may also provide

    media content playing.

    [1.C] receiving

    discovery

    information at the

    second

    computerized

    device set inaccordance with a

    device

    management

    discovery

    protocol that is

    implemented at a

    communication

    layer above an

    internet protocol

    layer, andwherein the

    discovery

    information

    allows the second

    computerized

    device set to

    Chen discloses control device 212 and video device

    218 in wireless communication, where control device

    212 provides, in a user interface, a list of active video

    devices 218 for video data playback. Chen discloses

    using a protocol similar to an Address Resolution

    Protocol (ARP) to determine a list of active videodevices. Chen also discloses using an Internet Protocol

    (IP) network.

    Chen also discloses storing multiple versions and formats of

    the video data to provide a version of the video data based on

    the available bandwidth of the selected video device 218.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 7:13-15: Preferably, the

    control device provides a list of all available video devices to

    which the consumer has access. See also id. at 7:23-25:Alternatively, a protocol similar to Address Resolution

    Protocol (ARP) can be used to determine a list of active video

    devices. See also id. at 3:38-42: Multiple versions of the

    video data in various formats are stored so that the highest

    possible quality version may be later delivered to a consumer

    based on available bandwidth and the consumer's video

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    26/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    21

    determine that the

    first

    computerized

    device set is

    capable of

    receiving the

    continuous media

    content and

    playing the

    continuous media

    content;

    device capabilities.See also id. at 4:65-67: The network

    preferably is an Internet Protocol (IP) network and may have

    bandwidth of 10 Mbps or greater.

    Elabbady discloses locally networked devices 202 (e.g., a

    PDA), 206, and 300 (e.g., televisions), that utilize the

    Universal Plug-and-Play (UPnP) protocol to connect in

    network 204. The UPnP protocol allows zero-configuration

    networking between proximate networked devices.

    For example, see EX1004 (Elabbady) at 5:54-65: One such

    implementation, in accordance with certain preferred

    implementations, includes the use of a Universal Plug-and-

    Play (UPnP) protocol that provides a peer-to-peer network

    capability that can support various devices through wiredand/or wireless connections. UPnP provides a distributed,

    open networking architecture that leverages Transmission

    Control Protocol (TCP/IP) and World Wide Web (WWW)

    features to enable seamless proximity networking in addition

    to control and data transfer among networked devices in a

    home, office, or other like environment(s). UPnP

    advantageously boasts device-driver independent and zero-

    configuration networking.See also id. at 10:13-16: Media

    CS 203 generates at least one media catalog 205, which isdiscovered by a network interface 314 of device 300 in act #2.

    Network interface 314, for example, may include or otherwise

    work with a UPnP User Control Point (UCP) 315. See also

    id. at FIG. 3.

    [1.D] wherein, in

    the event the user

    selects, via the

    second user

    interface, to have

    the continuousmedia content

    presented on the

    second

    computerized

    device set, the

    second media

    Chen discloses a user interface displayed on control device

    212 (such as a PDA), that allows for a selection of video data

    for playback on a selected video device 218 of multiple

    available video devices. Chen also discloses video device 218

    having a decoder for decoding video data before playback.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at FIG. 4; 4:47-53: The

    control device acts as a dynamic control pad for initiating

    video playback of content specific information and may be a

    suitably programmed Personal Digital Assistant (PDA)

    device. The control device is capable of inputting control

    command, communicating data, and playing multimedia data

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    27/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    22

    player decoding

    the continuous

    media content for

    presentation on

    the second

    computerized

    device set;

    such as, preferably, still images, text, preview videos, or the

    like. See also id. at 5:5-6: The video device can decode

    compressed digital video data and may be a television

    monitor.

    Elabbady discloses multiple networked devices such as first

    device 202 (such as a PDA) and other device 206 (such as a

    television).Elabbady teaches both PDA 202 and television

    206 being capable of playing the same media content.

    Elabbady also teaches

    For example, see EX1004 (Elabbady) at

    8:57-62 - With attention once again to FIG. 2A, devices

    206b and 206c are representative of media content playing

    devices. It should be noted, however, that one or more ofdevices 202, 206a and 206d may also provide media content

    playing.

    [1.E] wherein, in the

    event the user selects,

    via the second user

    interface, to have the

    continuous media

    content presented on

    the first computerizeddevice set, wirelessly

    transmitting, in

    accordance with a

    wireless local area

    network protocol, at

    least a resource

    indicator, wherein the

    resource indicator

    comprises at least one

    of a URL, URI, andURN, from the second

    computerized device

    set to the first

    computerized device

    set, wherein the

    resource indicator

    Chen discloses control device 212 receiving a

    selection of video device 218 for video data

    playback, and a selection of video data for

    playback. Chen also discloses wireless

    communication between control device 212 and

    218, and based on the selected video data and

    video device, control device 212 generates URLsand parameters including a MediaURL.

    Parameters are provided to the video device to

    retrieve and playback selected video data.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 7:5-7: The control

    device provides an input field 410 for the consumer to

    specify the video device that is to be controlled. See

    also id. at8:21-25: If the consumer selects one of the

    displayed excerpts, the video data corresponding to the

    excerpt will be provided to the video device for playbackat that point in the video data corresponding to the

    selected excerpt. See also id. at 4:55-58: The control

    device utilizes wireless data communications and may

    employ Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11 b, infrared protocols, or

    other wireless protocols, to establish communication

    with the network access point. See also id. at 6:43-54:

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    28/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    23

    facilitates obtaining

    the continuous media

    content for

    presentation to the

    user on the first

    computerized device

    set; and

    For initiation and control of video data playback,

    application software on the control device generates

    URLs, which pass parameters to a CGI application

    running under the HTTP server on the video device. A

    CGI syntax of name/value pairs is used for passing

    parameters from the control device to the video device.

    Parameters include MediaURL, VideoDevice, StartTime,

    so Volume, Reply, and Command.

    [1.F] wherein the

    continuous media content is

    not presented on the second

    computerized device set

    during presentation on the

    first computerized device

    set, and the first userinterface and the second

    user interface together

    comprise a unified media

    selection and presentation

    user interface, wherein the

    unified media selection and

    presentation user interface

    presents user input controls

    for selection of thecontinuous media content

    and for selection of either

    one of the first

    computerized device set and

    the second computerized

    device set for presentation

    of the continuous media

    content.

    Chen discloses presenting selected video

    data on a selected video device. Chen also

    discloses user interfaces having controls for

    selecting video data and for selecting a video

    device.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 5:58-62:After the user has selected multimedia data in

    order to view the corresponding video data or at

    least one video program, the control device 212

    communicates with video server 220 over the

    network 216 to instruct the video server to retrieve

    and provide the desired video data to the video

    device. See also id. at FIGS. 4, 7, 8. See also id. at

    8:7-10: The consumer then selects a particular

    video data (e.g., a television program) of interest

    from this displayed list of condensed

    representations pertaining to the content of the

    video data. See also id. at 7:4-7: FIG. 4 illustrates

    an exemplary control device screen for specifying

    the video device that is to be controlled. The

    control device provides an input field 410 for the

    consumer to specify the video device that is to be

    controlled.

    [2] The method of claim

    1, further comprising:initiating a user

    browsing session at the

    second computerized

    device set.

    Chen discloses an application that allows for

    browsing video data on the control device 212.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 4:14-17:

    [A]pplication software generates a content rich

    interface for browsing the corresponding multimedia

    data and initiating video data playback.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    29/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    24

    [3] The method of

    claim 2, wherein the

    user browsing

    session includes

    navigation of a

    content listing of

    content available

    from a remote

    source, and

    receiving from the

    user via the first

    user interface an

    input selecting the

    continuous media

    content.

    Chen discloses providing user interfaces on a control

    device 212 for browsing a list of video data. The video data

    may be stored in a remote multimedia server. The user

    interface includes controls for selecting video data for

    playback on a video device.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 7:66-8:10:[A] listing

    of multimedia data describing, in some manner, video data

    relevant to the search term is displayed. Multimedia data

    displayed may include a program name, date and time of

    airing, network aired on, and the like. The display of this

    multimedia data conveys a summary or condensed

    representation pertaining to the content of the video data

    for browsing and serves as a dynamic control pad for

    initiating of video data playback. The consumer thenselects a particular video data (e.g., a television program)

    of interest from this displayed list of condensed

    representations pertaining to the content of the video data.

    See also id. at 5:31-32: The multimedia server may be

    located remotely with respect to the consumer premises.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    30/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    25

    [4] The method of

    claim 2, wherein the

    user browsing session

    includes navigation of

    a content listing that

    identifies content

    available from storage

    within a computerized

    storage device that is

    independent of the

    first and second

    computerized device

    sets and is accessible

    to the first and second

    computerized devicesets via a packet

    network that is local to

    both the first and

    second computerized

    device sets, and

    receiving from the

    user via the first user

    interface an input

    selecting thecontinuous media

    content.

    Chen discloses browsing video data that is stored in a

    centralized database that may be local to the video

    device 218, and a database that is separate from control

    device 212 and video device 218. Network 216 connects

    all devices using an Internet Protocol (IP) network, and

    uses wireless protocols such as Bluetooth, IEEE, WiFi,

    or infrared. A user interface on control device 212

    receives a selection of a particular video data from the

    consumer, for playback on video device 218.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) 7:66-8:1: [A] listing

    of multimedia data describing, in some manner, video

    data relevant to the search term is displayed. See also

    id. at 4:32-35: While centralizing the video database

    offers economies of scale and eases maintenance, thevideo data can be stored locally (i.e., proximate a

    consumer's video device). See also id. at 4:55-58:

    Control Device communicates over network 216 which

    uses wireless protocols such as Bluetooth, IEEE, WiFi,

    or infrared. See also id. at 4:65-67: The network

    preferably is an Internet Protocol (IP) network and may

    have bandwidth of 10 Mbps or greater.See also id. at

    8:7-10: The consumer then selects a particular video

    data (e.g., a television program) of interest from thisdisplayed list of condensed representations pertaining to

    the content of the video data.

    [5] The method

    of claim 2,

    wherein the user

    browsing session

    includes a

    selection of a

    control function

    related to aparameter of the

    presentation of

    the continuous

    media content on

    the first

    computerized

    Chen discloses a control device 212 that provides a user

    interface for receiving input and instructions from a

    consumer. Control device 212 generates URLs to pass

    parameters to a video device to control playback. Parameters

    include commands to change the video playback volume, play

    the video, pause the video, or stop the video.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 6:44-50: For initiationand control of video data playback, application software on

    the control device generates URLs, which pass parameters to

    a CGI application running under the HTTP server on the

    video device. A CGI syntax of name/value pairs is used for

    passing parameters from the control device to the video

    device. Parameters include MediaURL, VideoDevice,

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    31/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    26

    device set. StartTime, Volume, Reply, and Command. See also id. at

    6:58-67: The Command parameter may take on one of

    several values. Those values include play (play the video data

    at the given StartTime), stop (stop the video data playback

    and blank the video display), mute (set volume to zero), volup

    (increase the volume by a predetermined number of units),

    voldown (decrease the volume by a predetermined number of

    units), volume (set the volume using the given Volume

    parameter) and pause (stop the video data playback, freezing

    the display on the current video frame), and other values

    within the skill of one in the art.

    [24] The method of

    claim 1, the method

    further comprising:

    presenting to theuser at the second

    computerized

    device set a set of

    control functions to

    allow the user to

    control the

    presentation of the

    continuous media

    content on the firstcomputerized

    device set.

    Chen discloses a control device 212 that provides a user

    interface for receiving input and instructions from a

    consumer. Control device 212 generates URLs to pass

    parameters to a video device to control playback.Parameters include commands to change the video

    playback volume, play the video, pause the video, or stop

    the video.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 6:40-50: The control

    device provides an interface, such as a Graphical User

    Interface (GUI), for display of information and solicitation

    of consumer input/instruction as explained below in

    conjunction with FIGS. 4-10. For initiation and control ofvideo data playback, application software on the control

    device generates URLs, which pass parameters to a CGI

    application running under the HTTP server on the video

    device. A CGI syntax of name/value pairs is used for

    passing parameters from the control device to the video

    device. Parameters include MediaURL, VideoDevice,

    StartTime, Volume, Reply, and Command. See also id. at

    6:58-67: The Command parameter may take on one of

    several values. Those values include play (play the video

    data at the given StartTime), stop (stop the video dataplayback and blank the video display), mute (set volume to

    zero), volup (increase the volume by a predetermined

    number of units), voldown (decrease the volume by a

    predetermined number of units), volume (set the volume

    using the given Volume parameter) and pause (stop the

    video data playback, freezing the display on the current

    [25] The method of

    claim 24, wherein

    the set of control

    functions comprise

    at least a play

    control function and

    a pause

    control function.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    32/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    27

    video frame), and other values within the skill of one in the

    art.

    [26] The method of

    claim 1, further

    comprising:

    presenting at the

    second

    computerized

    device set,

    enhancement

    content including

    information related

    to the continuous

    media content.

    Chen discloses displaying, in a user interface on a control

    device 212, multimedia content data related to video data.

    The multimedia content data can include, for example,

    images of a scene from a movie, a theatrical trailer, names

    of actors in a video program, and the cinematography of the

    video program director.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 3:21-29: Multimedia

    data includes multimedia content data, which is data based

    on the content of the video data, such as content specific

    index data, for example, an index of select keywords

    referenced in the video data. Examples of multimedia

    content data include still images (e.g., images of a scene

    from a movie), preview videos (e.g., a theatrical trailer),

    detailed information about the video data (e.g., names of

    actors in a video program, the cinematography of the

    director of a video program), and the like. See also id. at7:60-8:3: FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary control device

    screen of multimedia data indicating video data relevant to

    a particular search term. After a search term has been

    instructed (e.g., either by entering a search term on the

    main screen and clicking search button (518, 526) or by

    selecting a link on the topic list(610)), a search of the

    multimedia data, specifically content specific index data, is

    undertaken and a listing of multimedia data describing, in

    some manner, video data relevant to the search term is

    displayed. Multimedia data displayed may include a

    program name, date and time of airing, network aired on,

    and the like.

    [34] The method of

    claim 1, further

    comprising:

    Chen discloses a video device 218 that receives video data

    for playback, and the video data can be retrieved from a

    remote video server 220. Video device 218 receives URLs

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    33/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    28

    the first

    computerized

    device set receiving

    the continuous

    media content from

    a remote source via

    an Internet

    connection.

    from a control device 212, and the URLs include a

    MediaURL for retrieving video data from web server 220

    over a Wide Area Network (WAN).

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 6:40-50: The control

    device provides an interface, such as a Graphical User

    Interface (GUI), for display of information and solicitation

    of consumer input/instruction as explained below in

    conjunction with FIGS. 4-10. For initiation and control of

    video data playback, application software on the control

    device generates URLs, which pass parameters to a CGI

    application running under the HTTP server on the video

    device. A CGI syntax of name/value pairs is used for

    passing parameters from the control device to the video

    device. Parameters include MediaURL, VideoDevice,StartTime, Volume, Reply, and Command. See also id.

    at 5:60-62: The control device 212 communicates with

    video server 220 over the network 216 to instruct the video

    server to retrieve and provide the desired video data to the

    video device 218. See also id. at 5:31-38 The video

    server 220 may be located remotely with respect to the

    consumer premises 210. In such an instance, the network

    216 may use WAN or other network protocols to route

    packets between the control device and the video server, asis known in the art.

    Elabbady discloses an implementation of a WAN as the

    Internet, for retrieving content for playback on a first

    device 202 or other device 206.

    For example, see EX1004 (Elabbady) at 5:12-15:

    Depicted in FIG. 1, is a specific implementation of a

    WAN via the Internet. Here, computer 130 employs

    modem 178 to establish communications with at least oneremote computer 182 via the Internet 180.

    [35] The method of

    claim 34, wherein

    the remote source

    comprises a web

    server.

    Chen discloses a video server 220 located remotely from

    consumer premises 210, where control device 212 and

    video device 218 are located. Video server 220

    communicates with control device 212 and video device

    218 via network 216 such as a WAN. Chen discloses using

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    34/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    29

    URLs including MediaURLs to a HTTP server on video

    device 218, to retrieve video data.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 5:31-38: The video

    server 220 may be located remotely with respect to the

    consumer premises 210. In such an instance, the network

    216 may use WAN or other network protocols to route

    packets between the control device and the video server, as

    is known in the art.See also id. at 6:43-50: For initiation

    and control of video data playback, application software on

    the control device generates URLs, which pass parameters

    to a CGI application running under the HTTP server on the

    video device. A CGI syntax of name/value pairs is used for

    passing parameters from the control device to the video

    device. Parameters include MediaURL, VideoDevice,StartTime, Volume, Reply, and Command.

    Elabbady discloses devices communicating over a WAN

    implemented via the Internet.Elabbady also discloses

    using URLs to locate and retrieve media over the WAN.

    For example, see EX1004 (Elabbady) at 5:12-15:

    Depicted in FIG. 1, is a specific implementation of a

    WAN via the Internet. Here, computer 130 employsmodem 178 to establish communications with at least one

    remote computer 182 via the Internet 180.See also id. at

    12:21-26: The user control point would select a media

    content file, e.g., by URL!etc., that has a compatible format

    and uses a supported network protocol. Thus, for example,

    the client 316 eventually provides the URL, license

    information, metadata, or other like information to media

    player 324.

    [36] The method of

    claim 35, whereinthe web server

    comprises

    a media content

    distribution service.

    Chen discloses retrieving video data from an intelligent

    content distribution network.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 4:41-43: 4:41-43:

    intelligent content distribution networks can be utilized to

    efficiently distribute the video data from the video database

    to consumers.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    35/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    30

    [49] The method of claim 1, wherein

    the continuous media content is a

    member of the group consisting of:

    moving images with accompanying

    sound and moving-images without

    accompanying sound, wherein the

    moving-images originate from a

    member of the group consisting of:

    analog video, digitally coded video,

    television, Internet television

    (IPTV), Internet protocol (IP) video,

    film, animation, virtual reality data,

    and hybrid natural and synthetic

    video data.

    Chen discloses video data that is presented

    on video device 218. The video data

    includes compressed video data such as

    MPEG video.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 3:19-

    20: Video data includes that data used to

    display the video source material 100 on a

    video device (i.e. the video itself). See

    also id. at 3:35-38: For example, video

    data may be stored in a format such as

    MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, or other

    formats and delivered across the network

    at various bitrates.

    [51] Themethod of claim

    1, wherein the

    wirelessly

    transmitting

    begins in

    response to a

    user selection

    using the first

    user interface,subsequent to a

    user selection

    using the

    second user

    interface.

    Chen discloses a control device 212 that provides userinterfaces for selecting a video device 218 for video playback,

    and for selecting video data to play on the video device. Chen

    also teaches the control device 212 wirelessly communicating

    with video device 218 and video server 220 after receiving

    selections.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 7:4-7: FIG. 4 illustrates

    an exemplary control device screen for specifying the video

    device that is to be controlled. The control device provides aninput field 410 for the consumer to specify the video device

    that is to be controlled. See also 5:58-62: After the user has

    selected multimedia data in order to view the corresponding

    video data for at least one video program, the control device

    212 communicates with video server 220 over the network 216

    to instruct the video server to retrieve and provide the desired

    video data to the video device 218. See also id.at 6:43-47:

    For initiation and control of video data playback, application

    software on the control device generates URLs, which pass

    parameters to a CGI application running under the HTTP serveron the video device.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    36/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    31

    [52] The method

    of claim 1,

    wherein the

    resource indicator

    refers to a

    resource that is

    served in a form

    usable by the first

    computerized

    device set and by

    the second

    computerized

    device set.

    Chen discloses control device 212 generating and

    transmitting URLs for controlling video playback on video

    device 218. The URLs include MediaURLs. Chen also

    discloses storing multiple versions of the video data in

    various formats, which can be played on different devices,

    depending on the available bandwidth and capabilities of the

    device.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 6:43-54: MediaURL is

    a URL, URN, or URI indicating the video data stream. See

    also id. at 3:38-42: Multiple versions of the video data in

    various formats are stored so that the highest possible quality

    version may be later delivered to a consumer based on

    available bandwidth and the consumer's video device

    capabilities.

    Elabbady discloses multiple networked devices such as first

    device 202 (such as a PDA) and other device 206 (such as a

    television).Elabbady teaches both PDA 202 and television

    206 being capable of playing the same media content.

    Elabbady also teaches

    For example, see EX1004 (Elabbady) at

    8:57-62 - With attention once again to FIG. 2A, devices206b and 206c are representative of media content playing

    devices. It should be noted, however, that one or more of

    devices 202, 206a and 206d may also provide media content

    playing.

    [53] The method

    of claim 52,wherein the

    resource is

    enabled to be

    adapted to

    differences

    between the first

    computerized

    device set and the

    secondcomputerized

    device set.

    [58.P] A method for use in a second computerized device set which is

    configured for wireless communication using a wireless communications

    protocol that enables wireless communication with a first computerized

    device set, wherein the first and second computerized device sets include

    respective first and second continuous media players, the method

    comprising:

    See

    [1.P]

    above.

    [58.A] enabling a user to select a continuous media content to be

    presented to the user, wherein the continuous media content includes a

    set of encoded video data;

    See

    [1.A]

    above.

    [58.B] making available to the user a user interface that allows the user

    to select to have the continuous media content presented on either one of

    the first computerized device set and the second computerized device set;

    See[1.B]

    above.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    37/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    32

    [58.C] receiving discovery information at the second computerized

    device set in accordance with a device management discovery protocol

    that is implemented at a communication layer above an internet protocol

    layer, and wherein the discovery information allows the second

    computerized device set to determine that the first computerized device

    set is capable of receiving the continuous media content and playing the

    continuous media content;

    See

    [1.C]

    above.

    [58.D] wherein, in the event the user selects, via the user interface, to

    have the continuous media content presented on the second computerized

    device set, the second media player decodes the continuous media

    content for presentation on the second computerized device set;

    See

    [1.D]

    above.

    [58.E] wherein, in the event the user selects, via the user interface, to

    have the continuous media content presented on the first computerized

    device set, wirelessly transmitting, in accordance a wireless local area

    network protocol, at least a resource indicator, wherein the resourceindicator comprises at least one of a URL, URI, and URN, from the

    second computerized device set to the first computerized device set,

    wherein the resource indicator facilitates obtaining the continuous media

    content by the first media player for presentation to the user on the first

    computerized device set; and

    See

    [1.E]

    above.

    [58.F] wherein the continuous media content is not presented on the

    second computerized device set during presentation on the first

    computerized device set, and the first user interface and the second user

    interface together comprise a unified media selection and presentationuser interface, wherein the unified media selection and presentation user

    interface presents user input controls for selection of the continuous

    media content and for selection of either one of the first computerized

    device set and the second computerized device set for presentation of the

    continuous media content.

    See

    [1.F]

    above.

    [59.P] A method for use in a second computerized device set which is

    configured for wireless communication using a wireless communications

    protocol that enables wireless communication with a first computerized

    device set, wherein the first and second computerized device sets include

    respective first and second continuous media players, the method

    comprising:

    See

    [1.P]

    above.

    [59.A] making available to a user a first user interface that allows the

    user to select a continuous media content to be presented to the user,

    wherein the continuous media content includes a set of encoded video

    data;

    See

    [1.A]

    above.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    38/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    33

    [59.B] making available to the user a second user interface that allows

    the user to select to have the continuous media content presented on

    either one of the first computerized device set and the second

    computerized device set;

    See

    [1.B]

    above.

    [59.C] receiving discovery information at the second computerizeddevice set in accordance with a device management discovery protocol

    that is implemented at a communication layer above an internet protocol

    layer, and wherein the discovery information allows the second

    computerized device set to determine that the first computerized device

    set is capable of receiving the continuous media content and playing the

    continuous media content;

    See[1.C]

    above.

    [59.D] wherein, in the event the user selects, via the second user

    interface, to have the continuous media content presented on the second

    computerized device set, the second media player decodes the continuous

    media content for presentation on the second computerized device set;

    See

    [1.D]

    above.

    [59.E] wherein, in the event the user selects, via the second user

    interface, to have the continuous media content presented on the first

    computerized device set, wirelessly transmitting in accordance a wireless

    local area network protocol, at least a resource indicator, wherein the

    resource indicator comprises at least one of a URL, URI, and URN from

    the second computerized device set to the first computerized device set,

    wherein the resource indicator facilitates obtaining the continuous media

    content by the first media player for presentation to the user on the first

    computerized device set; and

    See

    [1.E]

    above.

    [59.F] wherein the continuous media content is not presented on the

    second computerized device set during presentation on the first

    computerized device set, and the first user interface and the second user

    interface together comprise a unified media selection and presentation

    user interface, wherein the unified media selection and presentation user

    interface presents user input controls for selection of the continuous

    media content and for selection of either one of the first computerized

    device set and the second computerized device set for presentation of the

    continuous media content.

    See

    [1.F]

    above.

    [60.P] A method for use in a first computerized device set which

    wirelessly communicates with a second computerized device set,

    wherein the first and second computerized device sets include respective

    first and second continuous media players, the method comprising:

    See

    [1.P]

    above.

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    39/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    34

    [60.A] providing discovery information to the second computerized

    device set in accordance with a device management discovery protocol

    that is implemented at a communication layer above an internet protocol

    layer, and wherein the discovery information allows the second

    computerized device set to determine that the first computerized device

    set is capable of receiving continuous media content and playing the

    continuous media content;

    See

    [1.C]

    above.

    [60.B] establishing

    a wireless

    communication

    session with the

    second

    computerized

    device set;

    Chen discloses a control device 212 (the claimed second

    device set) that may be a PDA that plays media including

    preview videos, and a video device 218 (the claimed first

    device set) that may be a television or computer monitor

    that plays video. Control device 212 and video device 218

    communicate over network 216 which uses wireless

    protocols such as Bluetooth, WiFi, or infrared.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 4:46-53: [A] control

    device 212 communicates via a network access point 214

    over a network 216. The control device acts as a dynamic

    control pad for initiating video playback of content specific

    information and may be a suitably programmed Personal

    Digital Assistant (PDA) device. The control device is

    capable of inputting control command, communicating data,

    and playing multimedia data such as, preferably, still

    images, text, preview videos, or the like. See also id. at4:55-58: The control device utilizes wireless data

    communications and may employ Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11b,

    infrared protocols, or other wireless protocols, to establish

    communication with the network access point.

    [60.C] receiving, via

    the wireless

    communication

    session, in accordance

    a wireless local area

    network protocol, atleast a resource

    indicator, wherein the

    resource indicator

    comprises at least one

    of a URL, URI, and

    URN from the second

    Chen discloses control device 212 receiving a

    selection of video device 218 for video data

    playback, and a selection of video data for

    playback. Chen also discloses wireless

    communication between control device 212 and

    218, and based on the selected video data andvideo device, control device 212 generates URLs

    and parameters including a MediaURL.

    Parameters are provided to the video device to

    retrieve and playback selected video data.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 7:5-7: The control

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    40/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    35

    computerized device

    set to the first

    computerized device

    set, wherein the

    resource indicator

    facilitates obtaining the

    continuous media

    content by the first

    media player for

    presentation to the user

    on the first

    computerized device

    set; and receiving

    discovery information

    at the secondcomputerized device

    set in accordance with

    a device management

    discovery protocol that

    is implemented at a

    communication layer

    above an internet

    protocol layer, and

    wherein the discoveryinformation allows the

    second computerized

    device set to determine

    that the first

    computerized device

    set is capable of

    receiving the

    continuous media

    content and playing the

    continuous mediacontent;

    device provides an input field 410 for the consumer to

    specify the video device that is to be controlled. See

    also id. at8:21-25: If the consumer selects one of the

    displayed excerpts, the video data corresponding to the

    excerpt will be provided to the video device for

    playback at that point in the video data corresponding to

    the selected excerpt. See also id. at 4:55-58: The

    control device utilizes wireless data communications

    and may employ Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11 b, infrared

    protocols, or other wireless protocols, to establish

    communication with the network access point. See also

    id. at 6:43-54: For initiation and control of video data

    playback, application software on the control device

    generates URLs, which pass parameters to a CGI

    application running under the HTTP server on the videodevice. A CGI syntax of name/value pairs is used for

    passing parameters from the control device to the video

    device. Parameters include MediaURL, VideoDevice,

    StartTime, so Volume, Reply, and Command.

    Elabbady discloses locally networked devices 202 and

    206 (which can be a PDA and television, respectively),

    that utilize the Universal Plug-and-Play (UPnP)

    protocol. The UPnP protocol allows zero-configurationnetworking between proximate networked devices.

    For example, see EX1004 (Elabbady) at 5:54-65: One

    such implementation, in accordance with certain

    preferred implementations, includes the use of a

    Universal Plug-and-Play (UPnP) protocol that provides

    a peer-to-peer network capability that can support

    various devices through wired and/or wireless

    connections. UPnP provides a distributed, open

    networking architecture that leverages TransmissionControl Protocol (TCP/IP) and World Wide Web

    (WWW) features to enable seamless proximity

    networking in addition to control and data transfer

    among networked devices in a home, office, or other

    like environment(s). UPnP advantageously boasts

    device-driver independent and zero-configuration

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    41/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    36

    networking.

    [60.D] wherein

    the wireless

    communication

    session isconducted in

    accordance with

    an Internet

    protocol; and

    Chen discloses an Internet Protocol (IP) network 216 which

    uses wireless protocols such as Bluetooth, WiFi, or infrared.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 4:65-67: The networkpreferably is an Internet Protocol (IP) network and may have

    bandwidth of 10 Mbps or greater.

    Chen also discloses using an Internet Protocol (IP) network.

    See also id. at 4:55-58: The control device utilizes wireless

    data communications and may employ Bluetooth, IEEE

    802.11b, infrared protocols, or other wireless protocols, to

    establish communication with the network access point.

    [60.E] wherein the continuous media content is not presented on the

    second computerized device set during presentation on the first

    computerized device set, and the first user interface and the second userinterface together comprise a unified media selection and presentation

    user interface, wherein the unified media selection and presentation user

    interface presents user input controls for selection of the continuous

    media content and for selection of either one of the first computerized

    device set and the second computerized device set for presentation of the

    continuous media content.

    See

    [1.F]

    above.

    [61] The method of

    claim 60, wherein the

    continuous mediacontent is selected based

    on an input associated

    with the second

    computerized device set,

    and wherein the

    receiving resulted from a

    selection of the first

    computerized device set

    as one of an alternative

    to and a supplement topresentation on the

    second device

    computerized set, based

    on the input associated

    with the second

    computerized device set.

    Chen discloses a user interface that allows selection of

    multimedia content including MPEG encoded video

    data. Chen also discloses a user interface displayed oncontrol device 212 (such as a PDA), that allows for a

    selection of video data for playback on a selected

    video device 218 of multiple available video devices.

    For example, see EX1003 (Chen) at 7:60-62: [A]

    control device screen of multimedia data indicating

    video data relevant to a particular search term. See

    also id. at 8:3-10: The display of this multimedia data

    conveys a summary or condensed representation

    pertaining to the content of the video data forbrowsing and serves as a dynamic control pad for

    initiating of video data playback. The consumer then

    selects a particular video data (e.g., a television

    program) of interest from this displayed list of

    condensed representations pertaining to the content of

    the video data. See also id. 3:36-38 - video data may

  • 7/23/2019 Unified Patents v. Convergent Media Solutions, IPR2016-00047

    42/68

    IPR2016-00047

    U. S. Patent 8,640,183

    37

    be stored in a format such as MPEG-1, MPEG-2,

    MPEG-4, or other formats and delivered across the

    network at various bitrates. See also id.at FIG. 4;

    4:47-53: The control device acts as a dynamic control

    pad for initiating video playback of content specific

    information and may be a suitably programmed

    Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) device. Th