UN/CEFACTLyon, TBG6

Meeting

TBG17 Report for TBG17 Report for TBG6TBG6

Korean Delegation, 27Korean Delegation, 27thth Sep. 2005Sep. 2005

UN/CEFACT

TBG17 (Membership)

Voting Members• TBG WGs and other Forum Groups• International Organizations

• Standards • User Groups• Cross-domain

• Officers

General Membership• Participants or Observers

UN/CEFACT

TBG17 (Submitters)

InternalEach TBG group should have at least one representative on TBG17

This representative is responsible for providing details and feedback to the TBG group they represent

External International Standards Organizations International or regional User Groups Governmental Organizations

UN/CEFACT

TBG17 Documents

1. TBG17 Terms of Reference Ver1.0 (March 2004)

2. General Procedures Document Ver1.0 (August 2004)

3. P1, BP and CC Project Proposal Ver1.0 (January 2004)

4. Submission Assessment Checklist Ver1.0 (October 2004)

5. Submission Guideline and Procedures Ver1.0 (October 2004)

6. TBG Library of Core Components ; Released CC Library ( 25 January 2005)

7. Submission Template Ver1.1 (February 2005)

8. Change Request Template (February 2005)

9. TBG17 Requirements for Additions to RSM (February 2005)

10. Controlled Vocabulary (February 2005)

UN/CEFACT

TBG17 Harmonizing Procedures

1. The workbook template distributed by TBG17 is the required format for submissions

2. TBG WG submmit to TBG17 RSM - Based on CCTS of last version (2.01 currently)

- Additional background information : Use Cases, Activity Diagrams, and Class Diagrams are requested

3. TBG17 harmonizing - Consensus is preferred - If consensus is not possible, votes may be taken.

4. Feedback of harmonization result to submitters

UN/CEFACT

Initail TBG17 Submissions

Submissions : 2,486 BIEs from 11 groups (July, 2004)

SUMITTER ABIEs ASBIEs BBIEs Total

eAC 16 27 54 97EANUCC 15 8 24 47

EUROFER 27 35 103 165OAGIS 42 84 139 265

oX 5 4 16 25TBG8 40 80 152 272TBG1 38 - 132 170TBG3 15 92 146 253TBG6 59 47 172 278UBL 67 180 356 603

US Gov 35 35 241 311Total 359 592 1,535 2,486

UN/CEFACT

Status of TBG17 Submissions(1)

Official Outputs : 49 ACCs, 307 BCCs and 117 ASCCs (25th Jan. 2005)

- No official harmonization for RSM including BIEs, BRS, etc

- I am not sure that those are approved as TBG17’s roles except CC library

Official Status of TBG6

- First business standard (BRS ver1, e-tendering in Works domain except BOQ) was approved under the CCs of latest version

- New BIEs (BOQ, Goods & Services domains including 20 new ACCs) were submitted to TBG17 in Mar. 2005

Current Status of TBG17 : Quality Assurance Actions since Mar. 2005

- 57 ACCs, 461 BCCs, and 222 ASCCs have been discussed (Sep. 2005)

* refer to “QA Actions.xls”

Current Status of TBG6 submission

- 17 ACCs, 38 BCCs, and 10 ASCCs from TBG6 e-Tendering BRS ver1 were discussed again in the list

UN/CEFACT

□ Table for the Status

Core Components

ACC ASCC BCC

Released CC Library (Jan. 2005) 49 117 307

CCs in TBG6 e-Tendering BRS Ver1(Mar. 2005) 23 29 67

TBG6 CCs under re-discussion in QA Action (Sep. 2005)* 17 10 38

* Candidate list of modification according to the newly released library after QA result

Must reflect them in Ver2 including BOQ, etc

Must follow them in case of new projects

Status of TBG17 Submissions(2)

UN/CEFACT

□ Sample of QA Distribution vs. TBG6 Draft 7 (ver1)

1) Identify typo's and spelling errors.

2) Check all acronyms are spelled out.

3) Check harmony between definition and cardinality.

4) Check to ensure all fields are filled out.

5) Check to ensure that definition is in accordance with template.

6) Identify discrepancies between definition and object class, property term, and representation term

□ QA action’s viewpoint

Red font-type identifies different term.

Refer to “CC_status_TBG6_QA.xls” for details

Status of TBG17 Submissions(3)

UN/CEFACT

□ Issues about the QA Action

Most of revisions could need just the editorial work

We need rearrange our BIEs according to the new library, for

example, rearrangement for the ‘Process. Details’ because of

adding new independent ‘Tendering Process. Details’

“Guarantee..” needs the further study

Status of TBG17 Submissions(4)