Upload
tori
View
60
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ultrafine Particles and Freeways. Yifang Zhu , Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Engineering Texas A&M University –Kingsville Email: [email protected] [email protected]. Comparison of PM10, PM2.5, and Ultrafine PM. Ultrafine PM (0.1 m m). PM2.5 (2.5 m m). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Ultrafine Particles and Freeways
Yifang Zhu , Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Environmental Engineering
Texas A&M University –Kingsville
Email: [email protected]
2
Comparison of PM10, PM2.5, and Ultrafine PM
PM10PM10(10 (10 m)m)
PM2.5PM2.5(2.5 (2.5 m)m)
Ultrafine PM Ultrafine PM (0.1 (0.1 m)m)
Human Hair(60 m diameter)
PM2.5PM2.5
(2.5 (2.5 m)m)
PM10PM10(10 (10 m)m)
Relative size of particles
3
Atmospheric Aerosols: Particulate Matter (PM) Size Distribution
Number Distribution
Mass Distribution
Ultrafine Particles
PM2.5
PM10
Source: Hinds 1999
4
Res
pira
tory
Dep
ositi
on, f
ract
ion
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Particle Diameter (nm)
1 10 100 1000 10000
Number Weighted
Mass Weighted
Head Airways
Tracheobronchial
Alveolar
Particle Regional Deposition for Light Exercise
5
Pathways of Particle Translocation Within and Outside Respiratory Tract
Translocation of UFP fromNP and TB region along sensoryneurons to CNS (neurodegeneration)
•Translocation of UFP to interstitium, capillaries, heart•Uptake by endothelium; platelets•Activation/interaction of endothelial cells, platelets and leukocytes
Alveolar inflammation
6
Publications Address Ultrafine Particles
Pollution Health Toxcicity Cardiovascula Asthma
Nu
mb
er o
f P
ub
licat
ion
s
0
100
200
300
400
500
Before 19961996-2005
7
8
I-405 Freeway
9
Sampling Site
Day
Night
10
INSTRUMENTS
Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS): Particle Size Distribution (6-300 nm) Condensation Particle Counter (CPC):
Total Particle Number Concentration
Q-Trak: CO, CO2, Temp, Rh
Portable Aethelometer: EC
Dust Trak: Real timePM10, PM2.5
Weather Wizard III:Wind speed and direction
11
Experimental Setup: 2001 Daytime
12
Traffic Effect: Total Particle Number Concentration & Traffic Density
Zhu et al., 2002a
13
Normal Traffic
Traffic Slowdown
Zhu et al., 2002a
14
RESULTS: Change in Ultrafine Particle Size Distribution with Increasing Distance
Day
Zhu et al., 2002a
15
RESULTS: Number Concentration for Different Size Ranges Vs. Increasing Distance from Freeway 405.
Zhu et al., 2002a
16
RESULTS: Relative Particle Number, Mass, Black Carbon, CO Concentration, Vs. Downwind Distance from Freeway 405.
Zhu et al., 2002a
17
18
19
Experimental Setup: 2004 Nighttime
20Distance from the freeway (m)
500 400 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Tot
al P
artic
le N
umbe
r C
once
ntra
tion
(cm
-3)
0.0
2.0e+4
4.0e+4
6.0e+4
8.0e+4
1.0e+5
1.2e+5
1.4e+5
1.6e+5
1.8e+5
2.0e+5
Freeway 405 Eastern SideLA National Cemetery
Western SideVA Facility
Daytime Dominant Wind
RESULTS: Decay of Total Particle Number Concentration
Nighttime Dominant WindNighttime Dominant Wind
Daily exposure to Ultrafine Particles:3 folds of difference between the two cases
21Distance from the freeway (m)
500 400 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Tot
al P
artic
le N
umbe
r C
once
ntra
tion
(cm
-3)
0.0
2.0e+4
4.0e+4
6.0e+4
8.0e+4
1.0e+5
1.2e+5
1.4e+5
1.6e+5
1.8e+5
2.0e+5
Freeway 405 Eastern SideLA National Cemetery
Western SideVA Facility
Daytime Dominant Wind
RESULTS: Decay of Total Particle Number Concentration
Nighttime Dominant WindNighttime Dominant Wind
22
RESULTS: Temperature Effect
Temperature ( oC )
0 10 20 30 40
Par
ticle
Num
ber
Con
cent
ratio
n/ve
hicl
e (c
m-3
)
0.0
2.0e+4
4.0e+4
6.0e+4
8.0e+4
1.0e+5
1.2e+5
405 Fwy Summer
405 Fwy Winter
405 Fwy Night Time
Y=7.35e4-1.74e3XR2=0.98
Y=5.17e3+1.17e5exp(-0.071X)R2=0.99
Zhu et al, 2006
23
Indoor Study Sampling Site and Dominant Wind
Zhu et al., 2005
24
I-405 Freeway
25
RESULTS: Effect of distance from freeways
Apartment 1
Apartment 2
Zhu et al., 2005
26
RESULTS: Effect of Ventilation Conditions on Size Segregated I/O Ratios
Zhu et al., 2005
27
RESULTS: Effect of Ventilation Conditions on Size Segregated I/O Ratios
Zhu et al., 2005
28
RESULTS: Effect of Ventilation Conditions on Size Segregated I/O Ratios
Zhu et al., 2005
29
In-Cabin Study
30
Outdoor and In-Cabin Size Distribution Time Series
Zhu et al., 2007
31
Average Outdoor UFP Distribution on Different Freeways
Zhu et al., 2007
32
Average In-Cabin UFP Distribution on Different Freeways
Zhu et al., 2007
33
Similar I/O Ratio Profiles on Different Freeways
Zhu et al., 2007
34
Effect of Ventilation Conditions on I/O Profiles
Zhu et al., 2007
35
TAKE HOME MESSAGES
• Because of dilution (and coagulation/condensation) ultrafine particles behave like a local source.
• Central station monitoring not useful for estimating dose
• 1 hr on freeway exceeds 23 hrs away from freeway.
• Newer vehicles with recirculation on helps to reduce in-cabin ultrafine particle exposure.
36
• Most ultrafine particles formed after exhaust leaves the tailpipe
• Cooling and dilution both occurring• Cooling increases nucleation• Dilution decreases nucleation• Complex physical process• Sensitive to environmental conditions
TAKE HOME MESSAGES
37
• Assessing Children’s Exposure to Ultrafine Particles from Vehicular Emissions
Objective: To identify hot spots in South Texas where school children are likely to be exposed to high levels of UFPs and develop simple models to estimate children’s exposure to UFPs from vehicular emissions.
• Using In-Situ Observations to Quantify Emissions from Prescribed Fires in two Grassland-Pine Ecosystems
Objective: To directly quantify UFP emissions from prescribed fires on DoD managed grassland and grass-shrub type ecosystems with different fuel types and fuel loadings.
FUTURE WORD
38
FUTURE WORD
Master and Ph.D. Students will be Financially Supported in Part by National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored Center for Research Excellence in Science and Technology (CREST)- Research in Environmental Sustainability for Semiarid Coastal Areas (RESSACA) at Environmental Engineering Department at Texas A&M University-Kingsville.