If you can't read please download the document
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
1
Ultra-Rapid Polishing of Silicon
Carbide (SiC) substrates
Rajiv K. Singh
CTO & Founder, Sinmat Inc
Professor, University of Florida
Fellow: IEEE, ECS, APS, MRS, ASM & AAAS
mailto:[email protected]
2
Outline
1. Sinmat Overview
2. CMP Technology for SiC
3. CMP Technology for GaN
4. CMP of Diamond
5. Defect Reduction in SiC homo-epitaxy by
novel CMP enabled substrates
6. Conclusions
3
Overview: Sinmat Inc.
University of Florida Spin-off
Novel planarization technologies for the semiconductor industry
Winner of four R&D 100 Awards 2004 & 2005, 2008, 2009
Top 100 most significant technologies of the year
10 licensed and pending patents
Employees : 28 and several consultants
Currently the largest worldwide supplier of SiC CMP slurries
4
CMP Slurries and Processes for Current and Next
Generation Semiconductors
s
p
slurry feed
polishing pad platen
wafer
pressure
5
Challenges: Polishing of Hard/Inert Materials
Materials Hardness Knoop
(Kg/mm2)
Chemical
Action
Silicon Carbide 2150 - 2900 Inert
Quartz 820-1000
Porous Silica (SiO2) 200-500
Gallium Nitride 1580 - 1640 Inert
Sapphire (Al2O3) 2000-2050 Inert
Diamond 8000 - 10000 Inert
Polishing rate is slow when soft particles such as silica are used (10 nm -100 nm/hr)
Mechanical Polishing of SiC
Poor Surface Quality
High Density of Scratches
Rms roughness > 1 nm, sub-surface damage
Surface Morphology: Optical Finish 10 m 10 m
Surface Preparation requires CMP
7
Challenges: Polishing Anisotropy
Least removal rate and worst surface finish in C-face polishing
C-face polishing rates 20 times less than Si face (6 nm/hr)
AFM of c-face after CMP
Example of Polishing Defects in GaN using
Conventional Processes
Sub-surface damage
Scratches
Non Planarity GaN on Silicon
Stresses
Ref . P Tavernier (JECS 2003)
9
Reactive CMP (RCMP) Approach : Soft Layer
Polishing
Surface reaction using surface modified nanoparticles. Soft layer Creation Soft layer removal by soft particles Ultra-smooth surfaces Low Friction process no edge pull outs No silica contamination No defect delineation
t
o n
m
Substrate (GaN)
Chemically modified soft layer
10
RCMP SiC Polishing: Ultra-High Removal Rates
Synergistic role of particles + chemistry
Tunable Slurry for high finish/high rate
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Conventional
CMP
State-of-the-Art
Si face CMP Si face
Sinmat
CMP
C face
Sinmat
CMP
10-20
nm/hr
Rem
oval
Rate
(n
m/h
r)
15-25
nm/hr
100 -125
nm/hr
1500 nm/hr
> 10000 nm/hr
Enhancement factor of 15
over state-of-the-art 1500
State-of-the-Art
C face CMP
2000
4000
5000
Enhancement factor of 200
over state-of-the-art
RCMP GaN Polishing Performance
Removal rate of up to 800 nm/hr obtained during planarization
Polish rate 10 - 20X higher than conventional CMP
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
10-50
nm/hr Rem
oval
Rate
(n
m/h
r)
400-800
nm/hr
Enhancement factor of 25-40
over state-of-the-art
State-of-the-Art
GaN CMP Sinmat GaN RCMP
AFM Surface Finish of SiC Surfaces After RCMP Polishing:
Atomically Terraced Surfaces
After polishing Line scan
GaN AFM Surface Finish After RCMP
Polishing: Atomically Terraced Features
Ra- 0.9 A, RMS- 1.2 A, Rz- 1.2 nm
14
Sinmat Process Vs Conventional CMP
Pit Creation
Conventional Silica based CMP Sinmat CMP
No defect delineation
Cathodolumiscence Measurements- Sub
Surface Damage
Secondary Electron Mode CL Mode
Sinmat Polished Samples- No Sub-surface
damage
Secondary Electron Mode CL Mode
Sinmat Process Vs Conventional CMP-
Surface Contamination XPS Studies
Binding Energy (eV)
N(E)
Min: 0 Max: 590
118 116 114 112 110 108 106 104 102 100 98
1
2
3
Binding Energy (eV)
N(E)
Min: 0 Max: 929
118 116 114 112 110 108 106 104 102 100 98
1
2
a bGa 3pGa 3pSi 2p
Binding Energy (eV)
N(E)
Min: 0 Max: 590
118 116 114 112 110 108 106 104 102 100 98
1
2
3
Binding Energy (eV)
N(E)
Min: 0 Max: 929
118 116 114 112 110 108 106 104 102 100 98
1
2
a bGa 3pGa 3pSi 2p
Multiplex XPS spectra showing (a) Si 2p peak (peak 3) (Conventional
Silica polish and (b) no Si 2p peak after Sinmat CMP polish
No Silica contamination after Sinmat Polish
Large Area Uniform Surface Finish
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
12
13
2
1
3
4 6
7
8
5 9
10 11
12
13
1
2 4
3
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
12
Before
After Polish
13 spot inspection
19
RCMP Process Highlights
Ultra-Rapid Polishing Rates
Rates up to 1500 nm/hr for SiC surfaces Polishing rates > 10- 20X higher than existing
processes
Polishing rates 100 to 1000X higher for C-face polishing
UltraSmooth Flawless Surfaces
Atomic Terraced Finish Eliminates scratches Angstrom level roughness
SiC MOSFET Device Performance
8.00E+10
5.60E+11
8.40E+11
0.00E+00
5.00E+11
1.00E+12
Sinmat
Processed
Conventional As received
Wafer process type
Dit
(eV
-1cm
-2)
SiC Substrate
Ni / Pt
Dielectric (CaxMg(1-x)O)
Au/Pt (Dia 50m)
3.723.26
2.58
0
1
2
3
4
Ele
ctr
ical
Bre
akd
ow
n
(MV
/cm
2)
Sinm
at
Con
vent
iona
l
As re
ceived
Process
Electrical break down field
Lower Interface traps for MOSFETs devices
Reduced Dit and Increased Electrical Break
down field
(Courtesy: Prof. Cammy Abernathy, University of Florida)
21
Diamond Applications
Polished
Diamond
Substrates
RF MEMS
Nano
Imprinting
DNA
Sensors
Optical
Windows &
Mirrors
MEMS
Ultra-Low
Friction
Smooth surfaces combined with high
modulus results in very high frequency devices
High thermal conductivity and
smooth surface will help in fabrication of SOI devices
Smooth surface needed for achieving
nano-scale resolution in imprint lithography
Smooth surfaces allow reproducable
attachment/detachment of DNA molecules
Smooth surfaces ensure reduced
light scattering and better light transmission through windows
Smooth surfaces decrease friction
and increase lifetime of devices
Si/GaN On
Diamond
(SUD)
Diamond Applications
22
Diamond Polishing Examples
Starting PV 50 micron to 0.7 micron after
25 hrs processing
Thin sold films 212 (1992)43
23
23
Diamond and Related Materials 6(1997)1789
Sequential Laser-Assisted Polishing
Advancement in Diamond Polishing Technology
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
1992 1995 1996 2002 2002 2002 2004 2006 2009
Year
Su
rface R
ou
gh
ness (
) Ion Beam
(Hirata)
15-700
Laser Polishing
(Tokarev)
70-1,000
Thermo-Chemical
Polishing (Tokura)
80-100
EDM (Wang)
2,000-10,000
Mechanical
Polishing (Hird)
250-400
CVD-UNCD
(Krauss)
120-200
Dynamic
Friction (Iw ai)
300-4500
Chemo-Mechanical
Polishing (Wang)
100-250
RCMP Process
(SINMAT)
1-10
25
Timeline of Diamond Growth and Polishing
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1989 Large area CVD growth
of diamond company
established (Diamonex)
1968 Low pressure vapo-solid-
liquid technology for
diamond growth
(Derjayuin, Russia)
1952 First demonstration of
diamond by synthetic
methods. (Eversole,
Union Carbide)
2005 High-rate single-crystal
diamond growth ability
(Carnegie Institute,
Washington)
2009 Super-smooth 1
diamond finished
substrates up to
100mm commercialized
(SINMAT)
1954 High pressure, high
temperature
diamond growth
demonstration (GE)
1981 Consistent
demonstration of low
pressure CVD growth of
diamond