TURNAROUND EXTERNAL OPERATOR PRESENTATION · A state approved district-managed turnaround plan required for double “D” or “F” schools After three consecutive grades below

TURNAROUND EXTERNAL OPERATOR PRESENTATION

Impacted Schools

222

Northwestern Middle School

Matthew Gilbert Middle School

Lake Forest Elementary School

Principal: Cassandra Thomas Principal: Jamelle Goodwin Principal: Shawn Platts

2

Trajectory of performance for each of the three schools

School NameSchool

Year

Total Points Earned

Total Components

Percent of Total Possible

PointsPercent Tested Grade

LAKE FOREST ES2016-17 264 7 38 100 D2015-16 234 7 33 100 D2014-15 112 3 37 99 D

MATTHEW W. GILBERT MS2016-17 333 9 37 96 D2015-16 284 9 32 97 D2014-15 152 5 30 98 F

NORTHWESTERN MS2016-17 361 9 40 97 D2015-16 315 9 35 95 D2014-15 145 5 29 94 F

3

Statute for Differentiated Accountability1008.33 2016-2017 Provisions 1008.33 2017-2018 Provisions

Schools earning a double “D” or an “F” had a year to plan interventions

Schools earning a double “D” or an “F” must immediatelyimplement interventions

Schools with double “D” or “F” not required to have an MOU with union

Schools with double “D” or “F” are required to have an MOU with union

Schools with double “D” or “F” not required to have a state-approved plan

A state approved district-managed turnaround plan required for double “D” or “F” schools

After three consecutive grades below “C,” 5 turnaroundoptions:

1. District-Managed Turnaround2. Reassigning the students to another school;3. Closing the school and reopening as a charter; 4. Contracting with an outside entity to operate the

school; or5. Hybrid combination of options

After three consecutive grades below “C,” 3 turnaround options:

1. Reassigning the students to another school:2. Closing the school and reopening as a charter; or 3. Contracting with an outside entity to operate the

school, including a district-managed charter school.

4

TOP 1 Options Timeline

Oct 16FDOE sent the

memo with the TOP 1 Options, with an initial due date of

Oct. 27

Oct 18State Board Meeting

Approved TOP 2 plans and made

initial TOP 3 selections

Oct 23-26Schools remained in

contact with the Chancellor

regarding the TOP 1 timeline.

Oct 16Districts with TOP 1

Schools met with Commissioner

Stewart regarding TOP 1 Options

Oct 25Initial district

meeting with CATheld at

Northwestern.

Oct 27Initial date provided

by the DOE fordistricts to submit their TOP 1 option

Nov 9Second CAT Meeting

scheduled forMatthew Gilbert

Middle School

Nov 15Extension due datefor TOP 1 Option for

2018-2019

5

TOP 1 Options*

Close school and transfer all students to a higher

performing school withinthe district

Transfer

Close and turn the

school over to a highperforming charter

school

CharterTakeover

Turn the school over to ahigh performing

management companyor district-operated

charter

ManagementCompany

*FDOE is authorized to allow districts an additional year to implement plan.

6

7

Legislative Requirements

8

Selection Process for External Operator(s)

November 20, 2017 December 1, 2017 December 7, 2017 December 21, 2017

Contacted Prospective EOs –6 contacted and 3

responded

Invited all Prospective EOs that demonstrated interest

to present their plan

Prospective EOs presented to fact

finding committee

Contacted Prospective EOs with follow up fact-finding

questions

1 2 3 4

9

Review of 2017-2018 Turnaround Timeline

November 15, 2017TOP 1

Intervention decision due to

FDOE

December 5, 2017

TOP 2 plans due to FDOE January 31, 2018

Recommended date for districts to submit

signed contract with selected charter or entity if option was selected for TOP 1

July, 2018Project

release of school grades

August, 2018

Deadline to submit revision

September, 2018

TOP Plans submitted to

the State Board

November, 2017Established Fact

Finding Committee to Research Prospective

External Operators

10

PROPOSALS

11

Proposal 1: Learning Sciences International

About:• Founded in 2002 by Michael D. Toth and

fellow university faculty members – 15 years of experience

• Partners with schools and districts to strategically achieve significant, sustainable gains in student learning

• Provides professional development and research-based school improvement solutions to K–12 teachers and leaders

12

Category HighlightContract Time of Support

5-year Transitional Plan

Curriculum Framework

• Innovative, student-centered instructional learning system grounded in real world application task and the new 21st Century Standards; planned curriculum transition over a 2 year period.

• Comprehensive professional development plan for leaders, teachers, and support personnel

Progress Monitoring & Assessments

Teacher created standards based learning targets and success criteria monitored through LSI’s Standards Tracker Technology Tool along with other district monitoring tools currently in use.

School Operational Plan

� Will have primary oversight of all school operations as they affect the quality of instructional leadership, curriculum, instruction, and student learning. DCPS will have primary oversight of non-instructional aspects of school operations including but not limited to transportation, food services, facility maintenance and security, student support services (ELL, ESE) equipment, furniture, etc..

� All school staff remain DCPS employee’s (teachers, assistant principals, and other staff)

Community & Family Engagement

Will collaborate with DCPS to create a comprehensive communication and family engagement plan. Plan will focus on collaborativeengagement with area media, parents, civic leaders, and influential community partners.

Cost Per School � Comprehensive Needs Assessment - $62,250� Readiness Phase - $ 81,750� Year 1 and Year 2 Operations: $ 995,000 � Year 3 - $495,000; year 4 - $ 395, 000 and year 5 - $ 198,000

Learning Science InternationalProposal Highlights

13

409

799

362

241328 326

659

387

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enrollment Comparisons – Palm Beach

Pahokee ES Gove ES Glade View ES Rosenwald ES Cunningham/Canal Point Pioneer Park Belle Glade ES Lake Forest ES

Learning Science InternationalLake Forest Comparison Groups

14

1

35

64

0

20

97

12

3

72

23

2

33

96

22

2 4

92

1

12

98

15

1

25

73

1

12

98

14

3

27

70

0

13

99

19

3

35

61

1

30

99

22

3

35

61

1

25

97

20

3 2

92

3 1

84

14

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% White % Hispanic % Black % Other % ELL % FRL % SWD

Demographic Comparisons – Palm Beach

Pahokee Gove Glade View Rosenwald Cunningham Canal Pt Pioneer Park Belle Glade Lake Forest


15

366418

747

904852

387

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Enrollment Comparisons – Pinellas, Pasco, & Seminole

Bear Creek ES Gulfside ES Pine Crest ES Midway ES Idyllwilde ES Lake Forest


16


39%

5%

52%

5%1%

80%

16%

58%

23%

10% 9% 8%

87%

11%

28%31%

36%

6%10%

40%

17%

16%

25%

53%

6% 6%

84%

17%18%

31%

42%

8% 11%

82%

16%

3% 2%

92%

3%1%

84%

14%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Demographic Comparison (Pinellas, Pasco, and Seminole)

BEAR CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GULFSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PINE CREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

MIDWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IDYLLWILDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LAKE FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

17


School Name

ELA Achievement Math Achievement Science AchievementInformational

Baseline Grade 2015

Grade 2016

2014-15

2015-16

Change 2014-15 to

2015-162014-

152015-

16

Change 2014-15 to

2015-162014-

152015-

16

Change 2014-15 to

2015-16PAHOKEE ES 26 33 7 37 49 12 33 31 -2 D CGOVE ES 33 27 -6 45 32 -13 34 22 -12 D DGLADE VIEW ES 39 25 -14 38 38 0 39 43 4 D CROSENWALD ES 26 33 7 61 63 2 19 26 7 D BCANAL POINT ES 26 30 4 36 47 11 21 31 10 F CPIONEER PARK ES 26 27 1 52 48 -4 43 38 -5 D CBELLE GLADE ES 24 31 7 28 40 12 14 26 12 F C

Performance Comparison GroupsELA Achievement Math Achievement Science Achievement Grade 2017

LAKE FOREST ES 32 42 18 D

18


School Name

ELA Achievement Math Achievement Science Achievement

Baseline Grade 2015

Grade 2016

Grade2017

14-15

15-16

16-17

Change 14-15 to

15-16Change15-16

14-15

15-16

16-17

Change 14-15 to 15-

16

Change 15-16 to 16-

1714-15

15-16

16-17

Change 14-15 to 15-

16

Change 15-16 to 16-

17BEARCREEK ES 35 35 47 0 12 49 46 61 -3 12 37 36 54 -1 17 D C A



19




School Name

ELA Achievement Math Achievement Science Achievement

Baseline Grade 2016

Grade 201715-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to 16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to 16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to 16-17

GULFSIDE ES 45 45 0 43 39 -4 28 31 3 D C

PINE CREST ES 26 32 6 30 35 5 29 19 -10 F D

MIDWAY ES 37 42 5 41 47 6 26 32 6 D C

IDYLLWILDE ES 34 38 4 44 42 -2 25 32 7 D D

20

Advantages• Elementary schools accounted for

twelve of the fifteen schools presented as evidence of proven track record

• One hundred percent of the schools presented improved in English Language Arts (ELA) gains and bottom quartile

• Experienced with supporting turnaround efforts in multiple elementary schools in Florida

Concerns• Some schools submitted for review did

not demonstrate demographics comparable to Lake Forest Elementary

• Math and Science did not show the same level of improvement as Language Arts

• Overall, this company showed an improvement of ninety percent or higher in only four of the twelve areas reviewed

LSI ConsiderationsLake Forest Elementary

21

648

840

435

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enrollment Comparisons

Lake Shore MS Pahokee Middle/Senior Gilbert MS

Learning Science InternationalMatthew Gilbert Comparison Groups

22


1%

29%

69%

1%

11%

97%

23%

2%

40%

57%

2% 3%

94%

19%

5%3%

88%

4%1%

89%

16%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Demographic Comparison

LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL (Palm Beach) PAHOKEE MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH MATTHEW W. GILBERT MIDDLE SCHOOL

23


School Name

ELA Achievement Math Achievement Science AchievementSocial Studies Achievemenet

Baseline Grade 2015

Grade 201614-15 15-16

Change 2014-15 to 2015-

16 14-15 15-16

Change 2014-15 to 2015-

16 14-15 15-16

Change 2014-15 to 2015-

16 14-15 15-16

Change 2014-15 to 2015-

16LAKE SHORE MS 23 28 5 25 36 11 26 34 8 37 53 16 F CPAHOKEE MS/HS 32 31 -1 30 37 7 44 49 5 45 56 11 C C

Performance Comparison Groups

ELA Achievement Math AchievementScience

AchievementSocial Studies Achievement Grade 2017

MATTHEW GILBERT MS 14 28 19 43 D

24

Advantages• Lake Shore Middle School, in Palm

Beach, improved in English Language Arts (ELA) gains and bottom quartile

• Lake Shore Middle School, in Palm Beach, is comparable in size, percent of minority and Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL) students to both Gilbert and Northwestern

Concerns• Limited evidence of turnaround

performance in middle schools similar to Matthew Gilbert.

• Elementary schools accounted for twelve of the fifteen school grades, while high schools accounted for two school grades and one school grade was attributed to a middle school.

• All schools submitted for review did not demonstrate demographics comparable to Matthew Gilbert Middle School.

LSI ConsiderationsMatthew Gilbert Middle School

25

648

840

524

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900


Lake Shore MS Pahokee Middle/Senior Northwestern MS

Learning Science InternationalNorthwestern Comparison Groups

26


1%

29%

69%

1%

11%

97%

23%

2%

40%

57%

2% 3%

94%

19%

5%1%

91%

2% 0%

89%

18%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Demographic Comparisons

LAKE SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL (Palm Beach) PAHOKEE MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH NORTHWESTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL

27


School Name


Baseline Grade 2015

Grade 201614-15 15-16

Change 2014-15 to 2015-

16 14-15 15-16

Change 2014-15 to 2015-

16 14-15 15-16

Change 2014-15 to 2015-

16 14-15 15-16

Change 2014-15 to 2015-

16LAKE SHORE MS 23 28 5 25 36 11 26 34 8 37 53 16 F CPAHOKEE MS/HS 32 31 -1 30 37 7 44 49 5 45 56 11 C C




NORTHWESTERN MS 17 23 22 51 D

28

Advantages• Lake Shore Middle School, in Palm

Beach, improved in English Language Arts (ELA) gains and bottom quartile

• Lake Shore Middle School, in Palm Beach, is comparable in size, percent of minority and Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL) students to both Gilbert and Northwestern

Concerns• Limited evidence of turnaround

performance in middle schools similar to Matthew Gilbert.

• Elementary schools accounted for twleve of the fifteen school grades, while high schools accounted for two school grades and one school grade was attributed to a middle school.

• All schools submitted for review did not demonstrate demographics comparable to Matthew Gilbert Middle School.

LSI ConsiderationsNorthwestern MS

29

Proposal 2: Educational Directions

About:• Midsized educational consulting company

with 20 years of service to educators• Professional development initiatives• Created computer systems to track and connect data• Has patents on several educational processes to improve school

performance through a student-focused approach for designing a successful school year

30


2- 3 year transitional plan


• Will use a number of strategies: Core approach will be to address the rhythm of the learner year and the types of experiences students need to have in each part of the and development focusing on equal opportunity in experience as learner and performer.

• Academic and management rituals and routines will be used to build an equal experience basis for all students and performers.• Comprehensive professional development plan for leaders, teachers, and support personnel


Will develop a true “plan backwards – deliver forwards” curriculum dependent upon extensive monitoring of not only student scores, but also the learning and performing competencies, attitudes, and perceptions required for the student to demonstrate his or her potential as a performer and to make successful transitions to the next achievement level. Additional progress monitoring will incorporate district monitoring tools currently in use.


• Determined by the current status of the school in terms of size, current culture and climate, curriculum and materials resources, state and district expectations. A core of roles that will be common include: Site Director and Content Specialist all employees of Ed. Directions.

• All other school-based staff will remain DCPS employee’s (Principal, assistant principals, teachers and other staff), but screened and selected by Ed. Directions.

Community &Family Engagement

Through collaboration with school personnel and district staff will implement a comprehensive family engagement plan. Plan will focus on collaborative engagement with parents, students, civic leaders, and other community partners

Cost Per School � Spring Comprehensive Needs Assessment - $62, 500� Year 1: $ 325,000 to $350,000 (based upon school needs assessment)� Subsequent years $225, 000 to $250,000 (based upon continued school needs)

Educational DirectionsProposal Highlights

31

Educational DirectionsLake Forest Comparison Groups

551 555

387

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Number of Students


PALMETTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH SHORE K-8 LAKE FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

32


7%

72%

18%

3%

22%

73%

13%6%

2%

87%

5%1%

94%

10%3% 2%

92%

3% 1%

84%

14%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1



PALMETTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH SHORE K-8 LAKE FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

33


School Name


AchievementWriting

Achievement

Baseline Grade 2011 Grade 2012

10-11

11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-1210-11

11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-1210-11

11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-1210-11

11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12NORTH SHORE K-8 38 31 -7 50 54 4 20 35 15 51 78 27 D B

15-16

16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-1715-16

16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17

Baseline Grade 2016 Grade 2017

PALMETTO ES 34 42 8 39 42 3 D C



34

Advantages• Experienced with supporting turnaround efforts in multiple high poverty

elementary schools in Florida • Palmetto ES showed growth in all areas of their school grade calculation from

2015-16 to 2016-17 and is similar to Lake Forest in size, percent of minority students, FRL students, and students with disabilities

• 90% of the schools improved in math bottom quartile and one hundred percent of the schools improved in science and social studies.

• Overall, schools presented improvement in seven out of twelve accountability areas.

• The percentage of total points improved for all eleven schools receiving grades • Ten of the eleven school grades, or ninety-one percent, showed improvement

of at least one letter grade. • All grades improved to a C or higher with two grades reaching an A.

Concerns• Elementary schools

accounted for two of the 11 schools presented as evidence of proven track record

• Not all schools served had identical demographics to Lake Forest elementary

Educational Directions ConsiderationsLake Forest Elementary

35

Educational DirectionsMatthew Gilbert Comparison Groups

1045

848

720

906

555435

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Number of Students


SHELLEY S. BOONE MIDDLE SCHOOL DENISON MIDDLE SCHOOL WESTWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL

CRYSTAL LAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL NORTH SHORE K-8 MATTHEW W. GILBERT MIDDLE SCHOOL

36


13%

65%

21%

2%

26%

63%

14%

30% 32% 34%

3% 5%

57%

13%

26%

42%

28%

4%

11%

68%

16%

36% 35%

23%

6% 4%

69%

19%

6%2%

87%

5%1%

94%

10%5% 3%

88%

4%1%

89%

16%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1




CRYSTAL LAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL NORTH SHORE K-8 MATTHEW W. GILBERT MIDDLE SCHOOL

37


School Name


Baseline Grade 2016

Grade 201715-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17SHELLEY S. BOONE MS 24 29 5 26 26 0 26 31 5 40 51 11 D CDENISON MS 35 35 0 25 24 -1 28 30 2 51 53 2 D CWESTWOOD MS 30 28 -2 29 28 -1 24 27 3 50 60 10 D CCRYSTAL LAKE MS 32 34 2 31 41 10 32 35 3 39 56 17 D C

10-11 11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12 10-11 11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12 10-11 11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12 10-11 11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12Baseline

Grade 2010Grade 2011

NORTH SHORE K-8 38 31 -7 50 54 4 51 78 27 20 35 15 D B





38

Advantages• Middle schools accounted for five of the eleven schools managed by

Educational Directions.

• Ninety percent of the schools improved in math bottom quartile and one hundred percent of the schools improved in science, social studies, and middle school acceleration.


• The percentage of total points improved for all eleven schools receiving grades.

• Ten of the eleven school grades, or ninety-one percent, showed improvement of at least one letter grade.

• All grades improved to a C or higher with two grades reaching an A.

Concerns• Not all schools served had

identical demographics to Matthew Gilbert Middle School.

• Inconsistent improvement in English Language Arts and Math Achievement.

Educational DirectionsMatthew Gilbert MS

39

Educational DirectionsNorthwestern Comparison Groups

1045

848

720

906

555 524

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Number of Students



CRYSTAL LAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL NORTH SHORE K-8 NORTHWESTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL

40


13%

65%

21%

2%

26%

63%

14%

30% 32% 34%

3% 5%

57%

13%

26%

42%

28%

4%

11%

68%

16%

36% 35%

23%

6% 4%

69%

19%

6%2%

87%

5%1%

94%

10%5%

1%

91%

2% 0%

89%

18%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1




CRYSTAL LAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL NORTH SHORE K-8 NORTHWESTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL

41


School Name


Baseline Grade 2016

Grade 201715-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17SHELLEY S. BOONE MS 24 29 5 26 26 0 26 31 5 40 51 11 D CDENISON MS 35 35 0 25 24 -1 28 30 2 51 53 2 D CWESTWOOD MS 30 28 -2 29 28 -1 24 27 3 50 60 10 D CCRYSTAL LAKE MS 32 34 2 31 41 10 32 35 3 39 56 17 D C

10-11 11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12 10-11 11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12 10-11 11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12 10-11 11-12

Change 10-11 to

11-12Baseline

Grade 2010Grade 2011

NORTH SHORE K-8 38 31 -7 50 54 4 51 78 27 20 35 15 D B





42

Advantages• Middle schools accounted for five of the eleven schools managed by

Educational Directions.

• Ninety percent of the schools improved in math bottom quartile and one hundred percent of the schools improved in science, social studies, and middle school acceleration.


• The percentage of total points improved for all eleven schools receiving grades.

• Ten of the eleven school grades, or ninety-one percent, showed improvement of at least one letter grade.

• All grades improved to a C or higher with two grades reaching an A.

Concerns• Not all schools served had

identical demographics to Northwestern Middle School.

• Inconsistent improvement in English Language Arts and Math Achievement.

Educational DirectionsNorthwestern MS

43

Proposal 3: Turnaround Solutions, Inc.

About:• A minority-owned business specializing in school reform• Employs a team of educators with decades of experience

in education dedicated to improving the performance of schools

• All team members recently worked in challenged schools with a successful track record of improving student performance

• Specializes in assisting schools increase academic performance in less than a year and sustain increases in three years.

44


2 -3 year transitional plan based upon school need


• Turnaround Solutions will use a number of strategies to improve student learning and academic achievement but centered upon DCPS’s currently adopted curriculum.

• Adjustments or modifications to learning plans will be develop based upon student current grade level of proficiency. • TS will also develop a professional development plan for leaders, teachers, and other support personnel as identified in the school’s initial

status review.


Turnaround Solutions will develop a curriculum based upon student current grade level proficiencies, identify all curriculum materials to be used, both current district and/or newly identified curriculum resources, and utilize currently adopted district monitoring tools in conjunction with TS identified progress monitoring tools.


• The management structure at the school will be developed based upon the site analysis and identified leadership and instructional staff criteria identified during review. Controlling factors will include but not be limited to performance evaluation data, teacher VAM data, school size, current culture and climate, and other data points. Although all school-based staff will remain DCPS employee’s (Principal, assistant principals, teachers and other staff), Turnaround Solutions will supervise, train, and evaluate all instructional personnel.

• DCPS will maintain oversight of all non-instructional staff and personnel.

Community &Family Engagement

Turnaround Solutions through collaboration with school community and staff will implement a plan to engage both students, parents/guardians, and other stakeholders as active partners in strategies for increasing student achievement and self efficacy.

Cost Per School • Elementary - 262 days of service at $500,000 • Middle school - 262 days at $750,000

Turnaround SolutionsProposal Highlights

45

Turnaround SolutionsLake Forest Comparison Groups

851

511

387 406 387

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Number of Students


GLOBAL OUTREACH CHARTER ACADEMY C. A. WEIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PINE ESTATES (387)**

RUFUS E. PAYNE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ** LAKE FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

46


23%

49%

23%

4%

26%

68%

10%9%5%

79%

6%1%

91%

16%

34%

3%

61%

2% 1%

65%

18%

2% 0%

98%

1%

91%

20%

3% 2%

92%

3% 1%

84%

14%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1



GLOBAL OUTREACH CHARTER ACADEMY C. A. WEIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PINE ESTATES (387)**

RUFUS E. PAYNE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ** LAKE FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

47


School Name


AchievementSocial Studies Achievement

Baseline Grade 2016 Grade 201715-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17GLOBAL OUTREACH CHARTER ACADEMY 37 42 5 37 43 6 29 29 0 50 79 29 D C

C. A. WEIS ES 11 14 3 16 26 10 13 21 8 F C



48




School Year School Name

% In Lowest Reading Level(s)

% Level 2 and Above

FCAT Reading

% Level 3 and Above

FCAT Reading

% Level 2 and Above FCAT Math

% Level 3 and Above FCAT Math

% 3 and Above on

FCAT Writing Grade

1999-2000 PINE ESTATES ES* 71 50- 29 58- 16 74+ D2000-2001 PINE ESTATES ES 73 75 27 57- 14 81+ D

School Year School Name% at Level 3 or

Higher in Reading% at Level 3 or Higher in Math

% Meeting the Writing Standard Grade

2001-2002 PINE ESTATES ES 46 28 61 C2002-2003 RUFUS E. PAYNE ES* 43 19 76 C2003-2004 RUFUS E. PAYNE ES 46 24 89 D2004-2005 RUFUS E. PAYNE ES 57 42 82 B

*prior year F

49

Advantages• Weis Elementary School is similar to

Lake Forest in all subgroups• Weis Elementary School showed

improvement in all areas of their school grade calculation from 15-16 to 16-17.

• Overall presented schools displayed improvement in seven out of twelve areas reviewed.

Concerns• Elementary schools accounted for

one of the 4 schools presented as evidence of proven track record

• Not all schools served had identical demographics to Lake Forest elementary

Turnaround SolutionsLake Forest Elementary

50

Turnaround SolutionsMatthew Gilbert Comparison Groups

173

851

671

779

435

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Number of Students


SCHOOL OF SUCCESS ACADEMY-SOS GLOBAL OUTREACH CHARTER ACADEMY WARRINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL

ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH ** MATTHEW W. GILBERT MIDDLE SCHOOL

51


7%10%

80%

2% 4%

80%

13%

23%

49%

23%

4%

26%

68%

10%

18%

5%

65%

11%

0%

84%

20%

58%

10%

25%

7%3%

43%

20%

5% 3%

88%

4%1%

89%

16%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1




ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH ** MATTHEW W. GILBERT MIDDLE SCHOOL

52


School Name


Baseline Grade 2016

Grade 201715-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17SCHOOL OF SUCCESS ACADEMY-SOS 23 31 8 24 36 12 25 29 4 54 77 23 D CGLOBAL OUTREACH CHARTER ACADEMY 37 42 5 37 43 6 29 29 0 50 79 29 D CWARRINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL 25 24 -1 22 23 1 39 25 -14 25 42 17 D D





53







% at Level 3 or Higher in Reading

% at Level 3 or Higher in Math

% Meeting the Writing

Standard Grade2005-2006 ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH* 68 72 91 A





Standard

% at Level 3 or Higher in Science Grade

2006-2007 ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH 63 67 89 45 A2007-2008 ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH 68 72 90 43 A2008-2009 ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH 68 71 91 47 A

*prior year A

54

Advantages• Two of the three middle schools presented

demonstrated improvement in the areas of ELA achievement, Math achievement, and learning gains.

• Out of the four school grades received, the percentage of total points improved for all schools.

• Three out the four school grades, or seventy-five percent, showed academic improvement.


Concerns• Schools presented did not show

comparable improvement in the bottom quartiles or in science.

• One of the four schools presented remained a grade of D, while no school grades improved to an A.

Turnaround SolutionsMatthew Gilbert Middle School

55

Turnaround SolutionsNorthwestern Comparison Groups

173

851

671

779

524

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Number of Students



ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH ** NORTHWESTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL

56


7%10%

80%

2% 4%

80%

13%

23%

49%

23%

4%

26%

68%

10%

18%

5%

65%

11%

0%

84%

20%

58%

10%

25%

7%3%

43%

20%

5%1%

91%

2% 0%

89%

18%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1




ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH ** NORTHWESTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL

57


School Name


Baseline Grade 2016

Grade 201715-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17 15-16 16-17

Change 15-16 to

16-17SCHOOL OF SUCCESS ACADEMY-SOS 23 31 8 24 36 12 25 29 4 54 77 23 D CGLOBAL OUTREACH CHARTER ACADEMY 37 42 5 37 43 6 29 29 0 50 79 29 D CWARRINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL 25 24 -1 22 23 1 39 25 -14 25 42 17 D D





58










Standard Grade2005-2006 ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH* 68 72 91 A





Standard

% at Level 3 or Higher in Science Grade

2006-2007 ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH 63 67 89 45 A2007-2008 ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH 68 72 90 43 A2008-2009 ORANGE PARK JUNIOR HIGH 68 71 91 47 A

*prior year A

59

Advantages• Two of the three middle schools presented

demonstrated improvement in the areas of ELA achievement, Math achievement, and learning gains.

• Out of the four school grades received, the percentage of total points improved for all schools.

• Three out the four school grades, or seventy-five percent, showed academic improvement.


Concerns• Schools presented did not show

comparable improvement in the bottom quartiles or in science.

• One of the four schools presented remained a grade of D, while no school grades improved to an A.

Turnaround SolutionsNorthwestern Middle School

60

CONSIDERATIONS

61

INDICATOR

ContractorLearning Science

InternationalEducationalDirections

Turnaround Solutions

# of Elementary Schools Served 12 2 4

% of Schools with at least 1 letter grade improvement 83% 100% 100%

# of schools with at least 1 letter grade improvement 10 2 4

% of schools that improved in Total Points earned 92% 100% 100%

Avg. percentage points earned in ELA proficiency 2.75 pts 0.5 pts 9.75 pts

Avg. percentage points earned in Math proficiency 3.08 pts 3.5 pts 12.75 pts

Avg. percentage points earned in Science proficiency 3. 08 pts 7.5 pts 4.0 pts

Performance Indicators

62

INDICATOR

ContractorLearning Science

InternationalEducationalDirections


# of Middle Schools Served 2 5 4

% of Schools with at least 1 letter grade improvement 50% 100% 50%

# of schools with at least 1 letter grade improvement 1 5 2

% of schools that improved in total points earned 50% 100% 100%

Avg. percentage points earned in ELA proficiency 2.0 pts 5.0 pts 3.0 pts

Avg. percentage points earned in Math proficiency 9.0 pts 2.4 pts 4.5 pts

Avg. percentage points earned in Science proficiency 6.5 pts 5.6 pts -2.0 ptsAvg. percentage points earned in Social Studies proficiency 13.5 pts 10.0 pts 23.0 ptsAvg. percentage points earned in Acceleration proficiency 16.0 pts 23.75 pts 21.0 pts

Performance Indicators

63

RespondentSchool

Lake Forest Northwestern Matthew Gilbert

LearningScience

International

• Worked in multiple elementary schools in Florida.

• All schools increased ELA gains.

• Worked in one middle school with like demographics.

• The school increased in ELA and ELA Lowest 25% gains.

• Worked in one middle school with like demographics.

• The school increased in ELA and ELA Lowest 25% gains.

Educational Directions

• Extensive work in Florida.• Familiar with Duval County.• 91% of schools in Florida

increased at least one letter grade in a year.

• Extensive work in middle schools.

• All middle schools increased in percentage of points.

• Previously worked in feeder pattern.

• Extensive work in middle schools.


• Previously worked in feeder pattern.


• Worked in school with like demographics

• The school increased in all accountability areas in one year.

• Experience in feeder pattern.


• Experience in feeder pattern.


ATTR

IBUT

ES

64

Superintendent Recommendation

Lake Forest: Educational Directions, Inc

Matthew Gilbert:

Northwestern:

Educational Directions, Inc

Educational Directions, Inc

65

Conditions that Could Impact Contract Language Negotiations

66

Next Steps

1

2

3

4

BoardConsensus

Contract Negotiations

Board Approval

Submit to Florida Department of

Education

67

Discussion

68

Documents

TURNAROUND EXTERNAL OPERATOR PRESENTATION · A state approved district-managed turnaround plan required for double “D” or “F” schools After three consecutive grades below