46
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

Trend analysis for HMs and POPs

Applications

I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

Page 2: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

List of trend parametersParameters for trend characterization:

Relative reduction over the whole period (Rtot),

Relative annual reductions of contamination:

average over the period (Rav),

maximum (Rmax),

minimum (Rmin).

Relative contribution of seasonal variability (Fseas).

Relative contribution of random component (Frand).

Phase shift of maximum values of contamination with respect to the beginning of the year (φ).

Statistical tests:

Non-linearity parameter (NL) 10%

Relative contribution of seasonal variability (Fseas) 10%

Page 3: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for the report

Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations

• Seasonality • Random component • Shift relative to beginning of year

Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries• Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates • Overall reduction

Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources.) Changes of transboundary transport Pollution levels caused by emission source categories Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation) Large Point Sources (LPS) Deposition to ecosystems

Page 4: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations

• Seasonality • Random component • Shift relative to beginning of year

Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries• Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates • Overall reduction

Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources. ) Changes of transboundary transport Pollution levels caused by emission source categories Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation) Large Point Sources (LPS) Deposition to ecosystems

Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for the report

Page 5: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Application of the analysis of trends to individual stations

Hg and B[a]P

- in air - wet deposition - collocated

Pb, Cd

Selection of stations: data available from 1990-1992 to 2008-2010 (Pb, Cd)

from 1996 to 2008-2010 (Hg, B[a]P)

Pb, Cd: 15 stations

Hg: 6 stations

B[a]P: 6 stations

Page 6: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Air

co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

, ng

/m3

Observed

Observed air concentrations of Pb for station DE1 (Germany)

Non-linearity of observed and modelled trends at monitoring stations

Analysis of modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 7: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Observed air concentrations of Pb their trend for station DE1 (Germany)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Air

co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

, ng

/m3

Observed

Non-linearity of observed and modelled trends at monitoring

stations

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Air

co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

, ng

/m3

Observed

Observed (main component)

NL = 45%

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 8: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Modelled air concentrations of Pb their trend for station DE1 (Germany)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Air

co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

, ng

/m3 Modelled

Modelled (main component)

NL = 43%

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Non-linearity of observed and modelled trends at monitoring

stations

Page 9: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Pb

No

n-l

ine

ari

rty

, %

Average among stations

Max among stations

Min among stations

Non-linearity of observed and modelled trends at monitoring

stations

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 10: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

0

30

60

90

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

No

n-l

ine

ari

ty,

%

Observed

10%

Non-linearity: summary for HMs and POPs

0

30

60

90

Pb Cd Hg

No

n-l

ine

ari

ty,

%

Observed

10%

Air concentrations Wet deposition

Threshold value: 10%

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 11: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

0

30

60

90

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

No

n-l

ine

ari

ty,

%

Observed

10%

Non-linearity: summary for HMs and POPs

0

30

60

90

Pb Cd Hg

No

n-l

ine

ari

ty,

%

Observed

10%

Air concentrations Wet deposition

Threshold value: 10%

0

30

60

90

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

No

n-l

ine

ari

ty,

%

Observed

Modelled

10%

0

30

60

90

Pb Cd Hg

No

n-l

ine

ari

ty,

%

Observed

Modelled

10%

As a rule, trends of observed and modelled levels at stations are non-linear

Linear trend at all stations

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Non-linear trend at all stations

Page 12: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Observed air concentrations and their trend, including seasonality for station DE1 (Germany)

Analysis of long-term trends at monitoring stations: seasonality

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Air

co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

, ng

/m3

ObservedObserved (trend)Observed (main component)

Cseas = 50%

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 13: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Air concentrations Wet deposition

Seasonality: summary for HMs and POPs

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

Se

as

on

ali

ty,

%

Observed

10%

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg

Se

as

on

ali

ty,

%

Observed

10%

FI36, Hg in air

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

19

96

19

97

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

Air

co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

, ng

/m3

ObservedObserved (trend)

Observed (annual component)

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 14: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Air concentrations Wet deposition

Seasonality: summary for HMs and POPs

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

Se

as

on

ali

ty,

%

Observed

10%

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg

Se

as

on

ali

ty,

%

Observed

10%

CZ3, B[a]P in air

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n in

air

, ng

/m3

Observed Observed (trend)Observed (main component)

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 15: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

Se

as

on

ali

ty,

%

Observed

10%

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

Se

as

on

ali

ty,

%

Observed

Modelled

10%

Air concentrations Wet deposition

Seasonality: summary for HMs and POPs

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg

Se

as

on

ali

ty,

%

Observed

10%

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg

Se

as

on

ali

ty,

%

Observed

Modelled

10%

FI36, Hg wet dep.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

We

t d

ep

os

itio

n, n

g/m

2 /mo

nth

ObservedObserved (trend)

Observed (annual component)

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 16: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Observed air concentrations and their trend, including seasonality for station DE1 (Germany)

Analysis of long-term trends at monitoring stations: random component

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Air

co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

, ng

/m3

ObservedObserved (trend)Observed (main component)

Crand = 66%

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 17: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Random component: summary for HMs and POPs

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

Ra

nd

om

co

mp

on

en

t, %

Observed

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg

Ra

nd

om

co

mp

on

en

t, %

Observed

0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg B[a]P

Ra

nd

om

co

mp

on

en

t, %

Observed

Modelled0

30

60

90

120

150

Pb Cd Hg

Ra

nd

om

co

mp

on

en

t, %

Observed

Modelled

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 18: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Analysis of long-term trends at monitoring stations: phase shift

Observed wet deposition and their trend, including seasonality for station NO39 (Norway)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

We

t d

ep

os

itio

n, g

/km

2 /mo

nth

Observed Observed (trend)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Jan

Ap

r

Jul

Oct

Jan

Ap

r

Jul

Oct

Δφ = ~6 months

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Page 19: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb, in air

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

CZ

1

CZ

3

DE

1

DE

3

DE

7

DE

8

DE

9

DK

3

DK

31

GB

91

NL

9

SK

4

ObservedPb, in air

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

CZ

1

CZ

3

DE

1

DE

3

DE

7

DE

8

DE

9

DK

3

DK

31

GB

91

NL

9

SK

4

Observed

Modelled

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Month of maximum air concentrations of Pb trend in 1990-2010

Phase shifts: summary for all stations (Pb, air concentrations)

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Num

ber

of m

onth

with

max

imum

Page 20: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Air

co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

, ng

/m3 Observed (trend)

Modelled (trend)

Δφmodel = 6 months

Trends of modelled and observed concentrations of Pb at DE3 (Germany)

DE3 is located at height 1200 m (but in the model at 550 m)

This station may characterize conditions mostly in free troposphere rather then in boundary layer

Possible explanation of difference in modelled and observed phase shifts (to be examined)

Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

Δφmodel ~ 1 month

Page 21: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Concluding remarks

As a rule, trends of observed and modelled levels at stations are non-linear. Exception is concentrations of Hg in air

Trends of observed and modelled levels at stations exhibit substantial seasonal variability (except of Hg in air). The most pronounced seasonality is noted for B[a]P

Random component characterizes non-regular short-term seasonal meteorological variability

Page 22: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for

the report Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations

• Seasonality • Random component • Shift relative to beginning of year

Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries• Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates • Overall reduction

Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources. ) Changes of transboundary transport Pollution levels caused by emission source categories Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation) Large Point Sources (LPS) Deposition to ecosystems

Page 23: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations

• Seasonality • Random component • Shift relative to beginning of year

Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries• Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates • Overall reduction

Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources. ) Changes of transboundary transport Pollution levels caused by emission source categories Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation) Large Point Sources (LPS) Deposition to ecosystems

Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for

the report

Page 24: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations

• Seasonality • Random component • Shift relative to beginning of year

Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries• Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates • Overall reduction

Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources. ) Changes of transboundary transport Pollution levels caused by emission source categories Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation)

Large Point Sources (LPS) Deposition to ecosystems

Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for

the report

Page 25: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Analysis of pollution trends in the EMEP region

Cd, Europe

0

2

4

6

8

10

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, g/k

m2 /m

on

th Deposition

B[a]P, Europe

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n in

air

, ng

/m3

Concentration

Pb, Europe

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.41

99

01

99

11

99

21

99

31

99

41

99

51

99

61

99

71

99

81

99

92

00

02

00

12

00

22

00

32

00

42

00

52

00

62

00

72

00

82

00

92

01

0

De

po

sit

ion

, kg

/km

2 /mo

nth Deposition

Hg, Europe

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, g/k

m2 /m

on

th Deposition

Page 26: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Analysis of pollution trends in the EMEP region

Pb, Europe

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.41

99

01

99

11

99

21

99

31

99

41

99

51

99

61

99

71

99

81

99

92

00

02

00

12

00

22

00

32

00

42

00

52

00

62

00

72

00

82

00

92

01

0

De

po

sit

ion

, kg

/km

2 /mo

nth Deposition

Cd, Europe

0

2

4

6

8

10

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, g/k

m2 /m

on

th Deposition

Hg, Europe

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, g/k

m2 /m

on

th DepositionB[a]P, Europe

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n in

air

, ng

/m3

Concentration

Page 27: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

B[a]P, Europe

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n in

air

, ng

/m3 Concentration

Main component

Hg, Europe

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, g/k

m2 /m

on

th

Deposition

Main component

Cd, Europe

0

2

4

6

8

10

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, g/k

m2 /m

on

th

Deposition

Main component

Pb, Europe

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.41

99

01

99

11

99

21

99

31

99

41

99

51

99

61

99

71

99

81

99

92

00

02

00

12

00

22

00

32

00

42

00

52

00

62

00

72

00

82

00

92

01

0

De

po

sit

ion

, kg

/km

2 /mo

nth

Deposition

Main component

Analysis of pollution trends in the EMEP region

Reduction = 3.4% per yearReduction = 6 (5 – 7)% per year

Reduction = 1.2 (-3.2 – 3.9)% per yearReduction = 2.2 (1.1 – 3.1)% per year

Page 28: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Sw

itze

rla

nd

Slo

ven

iaL

uxe

mb

ou

rgU

nite

d_

Kin

gd

om

Fra

nce

Sp

ain

Be

lgiu

mA

ust

ria

Lith

ua

nia

Ne

the

rla

nd

sIta

lyG

erm

an

yS

we

de

nF

inla

nd

Mo

na

coP

ort

ug

al

Ukr

ain

eD

en

ma

rkL

atv

iaN

orw

ay

Mo

nte

ne

gro

Re

p._

Mo

ldo

vaH

un

ga

ryIr

ela

nd

Est

on

iaB

ela

rus

Cro

atia

Cze

ch_

Re

p.

Slo

vaki

aP

ola

nd

Bo

snia

_H

erz

eg

ovi

na

Ro

ma

nia

Ru

ssia

Se

rbia

Gre

ece

Ma

ced

on

iaB

ulg

ari

aA

lba

nia

Cyp

rus

Ma

ltaIc

ela

nd

Tu

rke

yG

eo

rgia

Aze

rba

ijan

Arm

en

ia

Me

an

re

du

cti

on

ra

te,

% p

er

ye

ar

Mean reduction rate of pollution levels in the EMEP countries for 1990-2010

Rates of total deposition reduction of lead in the EMEP countries

Average rate for period 1990-2010

Maximum (beginning of the period)

Minimum (end of the period)

Trends in the EMEP region

Page 29: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Sw

itze

rla

nd

Slo

ven

iaL

uxe

mb

ou

rgU

nite

d_

Kin

gd

om

Fra

nce

Sp

ain

Be

lgiu

mA

ust

ria

Lith

ua

nia

Ne

the

rla

nd

sIta

lyG

erm

an

yS

we

de

nF

inla

nd

Mo

na

coP

ort

ug

al

Ukr

ain

eD

en

ma

rkL

atv

iaN

orw

ay

Mo

nte

ne

gro

Re

p._

Mo

ldo

vaH

un

ga

ryIr

ela

nd

Est

on

iaB

ela

rus

Cro

atia

Cze

ch_

Re

p.

Slo

vaki

aP

ola

nd

Bo

snia

_H

erz

eg

ovi

na

Ro

ma

nia

Ru

ssia

Se

rbia

Gre

ece

Ma

ced

on

iaB

ulg

ari

aA

lba

nia

Cyp

rus

Ma

ltaIc

ela

nd

Tu

rke

yG

eo

rgia

Aze

rba

ijan

Arm

en

ia

Me

an

re

du

cti

on

ra

te,

% p

er

ye

ar

Rates of total deposition reduction of lead in the EMEP countries

Pb, Spain

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, kg

/km

2 /mo

nth

Data

Main component

Trends in the EMEP region

Page 30: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Sw

itze

rla

nd

Slo

ven

iaL

uxe

mb

ou

rgU

nite

d_

Kin

gd

om

Fra

nce

Sp

ain

Be

lgiu

mA

ust

ria

Lith

ua

nia

Ne

the

rla

nd

sIta

lyG

erm

an

yS

we

de

nF

inla

nd

Mo

na

coP

ort

ug

al

Ukr

ain

eD

en

ma

rkL

atv

iaN

orw

ay

Mo

nte

ne

gro

Re

p._

Mo

ldo

vaH

un

ga

ryIr

ela

nd

Est

on

iaB

ela

rus

Cro

atia

Cze

ch_

Re

p.

Slo

vaki

aP

ola

nd

Bo

snia

_H

erz

eg

ovi

na

Ro

ma

nia

Ru

ssia

Se

rbia

Gre

ece

Ma

ced

on

iaB

ulg

ari

aA

lba

nia

Cyp

rus

Ma

ltaIc

ela

nd

Tu

rke

yG

eo

rgia

Aze

rba

ijan

Arm

en

ia

Me

an

re

du

cti

on

ra

te,

% p

er

ye

ar

Pb, Switzerland

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.21

99

01

99

11

99

21

99

31

99

41

99

51

99

61

99

71

99

81

99

92

00

02

00

12

00

22

00

32

00

42

00

52

00

62

00

72

00

82

00

92

01

0

De

po

sit

ion

, kg

/km

2 /mo

nth

Data

Main component

Trends in the EMEP region

Rates of total deposition reduction of lead in the EMEP countries

Page 31: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

GB

DE

AM IE NL

LU CZ

BE

FR AL

AT

HU

NO

HR IS

MD

ES PL

CY

SK

CH

BA TR SI

TM

RS KZ

RU

MK

DK

SE LT BY

GR

RO

UA

BG

GE AZ

UZ

LV PT FI IT

EE

MT

MC

ME

Me

an

re

du

cti

on

ra

te, %

pe

r y

ea

r B[a]PB[a]P, Sweden

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n in

air

, ng

/m3 Data

Main componentSE2 / SE14

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

ns

in

air

, n

g/m

3

Observed

Trend (main component)

Trends in the EMEP region

Rates of total deposition reduction of B[a]P in the EMEP countries

Page 32: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

GB

DE

AM IE NL

LU CZ

BE

FR AL

AT

HU

NO

HR IS

MD

ES PL

CY

SK

CH

BA TR SI

TM

RS KZ

RU

MK

DK

SE LT BY

GR

RO

UA

BG

GE AZ

UZ

LV PT FI IT

EE

MT

MC

ME

Me

an

re

du

cti

on

ra

te, %

pe

r y

ea

r B[a]P B[a]P, Estonia

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n in

air

, ng

/m3 Data

Main component

Rates of total deposition reduction of B[a]P in the EMEP countries

Trends in the EMEP region

Page 33: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Mean among countries

Maximum among countries

Minimum among countries

95 percentile

5 percentile

Average among countries

25 percentile

75 percentile

Average reduction rate and overall reduction in the EMEP countries for 1990-

2010Mean annual reduction rates

in countries

Page 34: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Average reduction rate and overall reduction in the EMEP countries for 1990-

2010Mean annual reduction rates

in countriesOverall reduction in

countries for 1990-2010

Page 35: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Factors affecting long-term trends

Meteorological variability

Secondary emission sources

Anthropogenic emissions

Main factors affecting trends:

Transboundary transport

Changes in atmospheric composition

Non-EMEP sources (boundary conditions)

Page 36: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Factors affecting long-term trends

Pb, Europe

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Dim

en

sio

nle

ss e

mis

sio

n .

Emission

Dimensionless emission of Pb in Europe

Page 37: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb, Europe

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

Dim

en

sio

nle

ss d

ep

osi

tion

an

d e

mis

sio

n .

Deposition

Emission

Factors affecting long-term trends

Dimensionless emission and deposition of Pb in Europe

Deposition reduction is smaller

Deposition trend is less smooth

Compared to the emission trend:

Main factors affecting deposition trends:

Anthropogenic emissions

Meteorological variability

Secondary emission sources

Page 38: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Model calculations for 1990-2010 to determine influence of factors affecting trends

Anthrop. emission

MeteoSecondary

sources

Effect of anthrop. emission

Effect of meteorology

Effect of secondary emission

Varies

Varies

Varies

Fixed Fixed

Fixed Fixed

Fixed Fixed

“Fixed” – relates to 1990

Factors affecting long-term trends

Page 39: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb deposition in Europe

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sitio

n f

lux,

dim

en

sio

nle

ss .

Deposition

Relative deposition changes caused by different factors

Overall reduction of Pb deposition ~74%

Factors affecting long-term trends

Page 40: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb deposition in Europe

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sitio

n f

lux,

dim

en

sio

nle

ss .

Deposition

Effect of anthrop. emisison

Overall reduction of Pb deposition ~74%

Major factor of Pb long-term changes is anthropogenic emission

Relative deposition changes caused by different factors

Factors affecting long-term trends

Page 41: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb deposition in Europe

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sitio

n f

lux,

dim

en

sio

nle

ss .

Deposition

Effect of meteorol. variability

Effect of anthrop. emisison

Overall reduction of Pb deposition ~74%

Major factor of Pb long-term changes is anthropogenic emission

Meteorological variability responsible for ±10% of deposition in Europe as a whole

Relative deposition changes caused by different factors

Factors affecting long-term trends

Page 42: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Pb deposition in Europe

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

De

po

sitio

n f

lux,

dim

en

sio

nle

ss .

DepositionEffect of meteorol. variabilityEffect of anthrop. emisisonEffect of secondary emissions

Overall reduction of Pb deposition ~74%

Major factor of Pb long-term changes is anthropogenic emission

Meteorological variability responsible for ±10% of deposition in Europe as a whole

Effect of secondary sources is explained by long-term decline of concentrations in soils

In countries of Europe the effect of these factors may be different

Relative deposition changes caused by different factors

Factors affecting long-term trends

Page 43: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Effect of transboundary transport on long-term changes of pollution levels

Reduction of Pb deposition 1990 and 2010 in the EMEP region

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

Slo

ven

iaS

witz

erla

nd

Lu

xem

bo

urg

Est

on

iaF

ran

ceB

ela

rus

Un

ited

_K

ing

do

mF

inla

nd

Be

lgiu

mC

roa

tiaA

ust

riaL

atv

iaU

kra

ine

Re

pu

blic

_o

f_M

old

oL

ithu

an

iaG

erm

an

yM

on

aco

Hu

ng

ary

Italy

Mo

nte

ne

gro

Bo

snia

_H

erz

eg

ovi

na

Ire

lan

dN

eth

erla

nd

sS

we

de

nD

en

ma

rkS

pa

inU

zbe

kist

an

Cze

ch_

Re

pu

blic

Ro

ma

nia

Kyr

gyz

sta

nA

lba

nia

Slo

vaki

aT

ajik

ista

nR

uss

iaN

orw

ay

Ka

zakh

sta

nF

YR

_M

ace

do

nia

Po

lan

dS

erb

iaP

ort

ug

al

Bu

lga

riaT

urk

me

nis

tan

Gre

ece

Ma

ltaA

rme

nia

Ge

org

iaT

urk

ey

Ice

lan

dA

zerb

aija

nC

ypru

s

Pb

de

po

sit

ion

ch

an

ge

, %

.

Page 44: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Reduction of Pb deposition caused by changes of national, foreign and sum of secondary and non-EMEP sources between 1990 and

2010 in countries of the EMEP region

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

Slo

ven

iaS

witz

erla

nd

Lu

xem

bo

urg

Est

on

iaF

ran

ceB

ela

rus

Un

ited

_K

ing

do

mF

inla

nd

Be

lgiu

mC

roa

tiaA

ust

riaL

atv

iaU

kra

ine

Re

pu

blic

_o

f_M

old

oL

ithu

an

iaG

erm

an

yM

on

aco

Hu

ng

ary

Italy

Mo

nte

ne

gro

Bo

snia

_H

erz

eg

ovi

na

Ire

lan

dN

eth

erla

nd

sS

we

de

nD

en

ma

rkS

pa

inU

zbe

kist

an

Cze

ch_

Re

pu

blic

Ro

ma

nia

Kyr

gyz

sta

nA

lba

nia

Slo

vaki

aT

ajik

ista

nR

uss

iaN

orw

ay

Ka

zakh

sta

nF

YR

_M

ace

do

nia

Po

lan

dS

erb

iaP

ort

ug

al

Bu

lga

riaT

urk

me

nis

tan

Gre

ece

Ma

ltaA

rme

nia

Ge

org

iaT

urk

ey

Ice

lan

dA

zerb

aija

nC

ypru

s

Pb

de

po

sit

ion

ch

an

ge

, %

.

National Foreign Non-EMEP and Secondary

U.K.

0

20

40

60

80

100Deposition of Pb

Effect of transboundary transport on long-term changes of pollution levels

Factors affecting long-term trends

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

19

90

19

95

20

00

20

05

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, k

g/k

m2/y

N-E & S

Foreign

National

Page 45: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

Slo

ven

iaS

witz

erla

nd

Lu

xem

bo

urg

Est

on

iaF

ran

ceB

ela

rus

Un

ited

_K

ing

do

mF

inla

nd

Be

lgiu

mC

roa

tiaA

ust

riaL

atv

iaU

kra

ine

Re

pu

blic

_o

f_M

old

oL

ithu

an

iaG

erm

an

yM

on

aco

Hu

ng

ary

Italy

Mo

nte

ne

gro

Bo

snia

_H

erz

eg

ovi

na

Ire

lan

dN

eth

erla

nd

sS

we

de

nD

en

ma

rkS

pa

inU

zbe

kist

an

Cze

ch_

Re

pu

blic

Ro

ma

nia

Kyr

gyz

sta

nA

lba

nia

Slo

vaki

aT

ajik

ista

nR

uss

iaN

orw

ay

Ka

zakh

sta

nF

YR

_M

ace

do

nia

Po

lan

dS

erb

iaP

ort

ug

al

Bu

lga

riaT

urk

me

nis

tan

Gre

ece

Ma

ltaA

rme

nia

Ge

org

iaT

urk

ey

Ice

lan

dA

zerb

aija

nC

ypru

s

Pb

de

po

sit

ion

ch

an

ge

, %

.

National Foreign Non-EMEP and Secondary

Reduction of Pb deposition caused by changes of national, foreign and sum of secondary and non-EMEP sources between 1990 and

2010 in countries of the EMEP region

Latvia

0

20

40

60

80

100 Deposition of Pb

Effect of transboundary transport on long-term changes of pollution levels

Factors affecting long-term trends

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

19

90

19

95

20

00

20

05

20

10

De

po

sit

ion

, k

g/k

m2/y

N-E & S

Foreign

National

Page 46: Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, 17-18 November 2014

Changes in key source categories

Contribution of source categories to HM deposition in EMEP countries

0 10 20 30 40

Energyproduction

Combustionin industry

Metalproduction

Non-industrial

combustion

Wasteincineration

Other

Hg deposition, t/y

Mercury

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Roadtransport

Metalproduction

Combustionin industry

Energyproduction

Non-industrial

combustion

Other

Pb deposition, kt/y

1990

2010

Lead

18