Upload
kenneth-stanley
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Treatment of ST Elevation MI Treatment of ST Elevation MI in the ED: Fibrinolytics, in the ED: Fibrinolytics,
Antiplatelets and Antiplatelets and AntithrombinsAntithrombins
James Hoekstra, MDProfessor and Chair
Department of Emergency MedicineWake Forest University
Treatment of ST Elevation MI Treatment of ST Elevation MI in the ED: Fibrinolytics, in the ED: Fibrinolytics,
Antiplatelets and Antiplatelets and AntithrombinsAntithrombins
James Hoekstra, MDProfessor and Chair
Department of Emergency MedicineWake Forest University
Atherothrombosis: Thrombus Superimposed on Atherosclerotic Plaque
Adapted with permission from Falk E, et al. Circulation. 1995 ;92:657-671.Adapted with permission from Falk E, et al. Circulation. 1995 ;92:657-671.
Slide reproduced with permission from Cannon CP: Atherothrombosis slide compendium; www.theheart.orgSlide reproduced with permission from Cannon CP: Atherothrombosis slide compendium; www.theheart.org
Annual Admissions for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
Annual Admissions for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
1.4 MillionNon-ST-segment
elevation ACS
600,000ST-segment elevation
MI
~ 2.0 MM patients admittedto CCU or telemetry annually
Class I ED Treatment of STEMI:AHA/ACC Guidelines
(ST Elevation, BBB, Pain<12 Hours)
Class I ED Treatment of STEMI:AHA/ACC Guidelines
(ST Elevation, BBB, Pain<12 Hours)
Targeted ED Protocol and Collaboration
O2, IV, monitor
ASA immediately (162-325 mg)
Nitrates, beta blockers (IV)
Heparin weight based dosing (60 IVP and 12/k/h, max 4000/1000)
Fibrinolytics in less than 30 minutes (esp if CP<3 hours)
PCI less than 90 minutes if available
Treatment of Complications
Targeted ED Protocol and Collaboration
O2, IV, monitor
ASA immediately (162-325 mg)
Nitrates, beta blockers (IV)
Heparin weight based dosing (60 IVP and 12/k/h, max 4000/1000)
Fibrinolytics in less than 30 minutes (esp if CP<3 hours)
PCI less than 90 minutes if available
Treatment of Complications
Rapid time to treatment with fibrinolytics improves outcomes in ST MI
Absolute %difference
in mortalityat 35 days
0-1 2-3 4-6 7-12 12-24
The Fibrinolytics Therapy Trialists’ collaborative group. Lancet. 1994; 343: 311-322
Time from onset of symptoms to treatment (hours)
3.5%
2.5%
1.8% 1.6%
0.5%
STEMI Treatment in the ED: The Options
STEMI Treatment in the ED: The Options
STEMI: ST segment elevation MI, new LBBB, pain less than 12 hours, eligible for fibrinolytics Treatment with Fibrinolytic Therapy and UFH Treatment with Fibrinolytic Therapy with
LMWH Addition of Clopidogrel to Fibrinolytics Treatment with Primary PCI Treatment with Facilitated PCI with IIb/IIIa or
half dose fibrinolytic
STEMI: ST segment elevation MI, new LBBB, pain less than 12 hours, eligible for fibrinolytics Treatment with Fibrinolytic Therapy and UFH Treatment with Fibrinolytic Therapy with
LMWH Addition of Clopidogrel to Fibrinolytics Treatment with Primary PCI Treatment with Facilitated PCI with IIb/IIIa or
half dose fibrinolytic
STEMI Treatment with Fibrinolytic Therapy
STEMI Treatment with Fibrinolytic Therapy
Reperfusion GuidelinesReperfusion Guidelines
STEMI patients presenting to a facility without PCI capability should undergo fibrinolysis unless contraindicated (class I)
STEMI patients presenting to a facility without PCI capability should undergo fibrinolysis unless contraindicated (class I)
Fibrinolytic Therapy InclusionsFibrinolytic Therapy Inclusions
Symptoms >30 minutes<12 hours
ECG ST elevation >2mm in 2 contiguous precordial leads or >1mm in 2 contiguous limb leads, or ST depression >2mm in precordial leads with reciprocal ST elevation in II, AVF, V6
New BBB
Patient Consent
Symptoms >30 minutes<12 hours
ECG ST elevation >2mm in 2 contiguous precordial leads or >1mm in 2 contiguous limb leads, or ST depression >2mm in precordial leads with reciprocal ST elevation in II, AVF, V6
New BBB
Patient Consent
Thrombolytic Therapy ExclusionsThrombolytic Therapy Exclusions
Prior ICH
Active Bleeding
Altered Mental Status
Major CNS Surgery <6 weeks PTA
CVA <3 mo PTA
Bleeding Diathesis
CHI < 3 mo PTA
Prior ICH
Active Bleeding
Altered Mental Status
Major CNS Surgery <6 weeks PTA
CVA <3 mo PTA
Bleeding Diathesis
CHI < 3 mo PTA
CNS AVM, Aneurysm, Tumor
AAA/Dissection
CNS AVM, Aneurysm, Tumor
AAA/Dissection
Thrombolytic Therapy Relative Contraindications
Thrombolytic Therapy Relative Contraindications
SBP >180, DBP >110
Recent CPR
Recent Surgery or Trauma <3 wks
Ischemic CVA >3 mo
Recent Int Bleeding
Coumadin Use
Chronic Severe HTN
Noncompressible Vascular Punctures
SBP >180, DBP >110
Recent CPR
Recent Surgery or Trauma <3 wks
Ischemic CVA >3 mo
Recent Int Bleeding
Coumadin Use
Chronic Severe HTN
Noncompressible Vascular Punctures
Cardiogenic Shock
Peptic Ulcer Disease
Pregnancy
Cardiogenic Shock
Peptic Ulcer Disease
Pregnancy
Reperfusion guidelinesReperfusion guidelines
Mortality reduction is greatest when thrombolysis is performed within the first 60 minutes of symptoms
If symptoms have persisted beyond 12 hours, PCI is suggested
Guideline recommendations are not made regarding the selection of fibrinolytic agents
Mortality reduction is greatest when thrombolysis is performed within the first 60 minutes of symptoms
If symptoms have persisted beyond 12 hours, PCI is suggested
Guideline recommendations are not made regarding the selection of fibrinolytic agents
Deficiencies of Current Thrombolytic Regimens for STEMI
Deficiencies of Current Thrombolytic Regimens for STEMI
Suboptimal macroperfusion ± 60% TIMI grade 3 flow at 90 min
Inadequate microperfusion Impaired tissue flow in > 50% of pts with
TIMI grade 3 flow High rates of reocclusion
Inhospital reinfarction ± 4% High rates of ICH
0.5 – 1.0% Angiographically proven reocclusion ± 25%
at 3 months
Suboptimal macroperfusion ± 60% TIMI grade 3 flow at 90 min
Inadequate microperfusion Impaired tissue flow in > 50% of pts with
TIMI grade 3 flow High rates of reocclusion
Inhospital reinfarction ± 4% High rates of ICH
0.5 – 1.0% Angiographically proven reocclusion ± 25%
at 3 months
STEMI Treatment with LMWH and Fibrinolytic Therapy
STEMI Treatment with LMWH and Fibrinolytic Therapy
Trials of Enoxaparin plus Fibrinolytics in STEMI
Trials of Enoxaparin plus Fibrinolytics in STEMI
Hart 2: LMWH plus TPA
AMI-SK: LMWH plus SK (NOT)
ENTIRE: LMWH, Reopro, TNK-TPA
ASSENT III: LMWH, Reopro, TNK-TPA
EXTRACT TIMI 25
Hart 2: LMWH plus TPA
AMI-SK: LMWH plus SK (NOT)
ENTIRE: LMWH, Reopro, TNK-TPA
ASSENT III: LMWH, Reopro, TNK-TPA
EXTRACT TIMI 25
ASSENT 3 Randomization ASSENT 3 Randomization
EnoxaparinI.V. bolus
EnoxaparinI.V. bolus
ENOXAPARIN
UFH I.V. bolusUFH I.V. bolus
ABCIXIMAB
TNK-tPA full doseI.V. bolus
TNK-tPA full doseI.V. bolus
AbciximabI.V. bolus
AbciximabI.V. bolus
TNK-tPA half doseI.V. bolus
TNK-tPA half doseI.V. bolus
EnoxaparinS.C.injections every
12 hours up to discharge or
revascularization (max of 7 days)
EnoxaparinS.C.injections every
12 hours up to discharge or
revascularization (max of 7 days)
AbciximabI.V. infusion for 12
hrs
AbciximabI.V. infusion for 12
hrs
UFH I.V. Infusion for up to 48 hrs
UFH I.V. Infusion for up to 48 hrs
RANDOMIZATION 1:1:1
RANDOMIZATION 1:1:1
UFH I.V. bolusUFH I.V. bolus
UFH
TNK-tPA full doseI.V. bolus
TNK-tPA full doseI.V. bolus
UFH I.V. infusionfor up to 48 hrs
UFH I.V. infusionfor up to 48 hrs
n=6000n=6000
ASSENT-3 Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Significant Improvement in TNK + Enox and TNK + Abx vs TNK +
UFH
ASSENT-3 Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Significant Improvement in TNK + Enox and TNK + Abx vs TNK +
UFH
11.4 11.1
15.4
0
5
10
15
20
TNK + EnoxTNK + Enox 1/2 TNK + Abx1/2 TNK + Abx
Per
cent
(%
)P
erce
nt (
%)
3 way 3 way P=0.0001=0.00013 way 3 way P=0.0001=0.0001
P=0.0002*P=0.0002*P=0.0009*P=0.0009*
*P values are the Bonferroni P-values after correcting for multiple comparisons. *P values are the Bonferroni P-values after correcting for multiple comparisons.
TNK + UFHTNK + UFHTNK + UFHTNK + UFH
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Composite of 30-day mortality, recurrent MI, refractory ischemia.
ASSENT 3: Individual EndpointsASSENT 3: Individual Endpoints
Endpoint Enoxaparin Abciximab Unfractionated heparin
p value
30-day death 5.4% 6.6% 6.0% 0.25
In-hospital re-infarction
2.7% 2.2% 4.2% 0.0009
In-hospital refractory ischemia
4.5% 3.2% 6.5% <0.0001
In-hospital ICH 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.98
Other major bleeding
3.0% 4.3% 2.2% 0.0005
ASSENT 3
The ASSENT 3 Investigators. Lancet 2001; 358: 605-13
LMWH versus UFHLMWH versus UFH ASSENT-3 PLUS
Prehospital study of tenecteplase + (LMWH versus UFH)LMWH group demonstrated
increased rates of major bleeding (4% vs 2.8%, p = 0.18)
LMWH group demonstrated increased intracranial bleeding (2.2% vs 1.0%, P = 0.05)
Thus, because of concerns of increased bleeding and not clear mortality benefit, LMWH receives a IIb recommendation.
ASSENT-3 PLUS Prehospital study of tenecteplase +
(LMWH versus UFH)LMWH group demonstrated
increased rates of major bleeding (4% vs 2.8%, p = 0.18)
LMWH group demonstrated increased intracranial bleeding (2.2% vs 1.0%, P = 0.05)
Thus, because of concerns of increased bleeding and not clear mortality benefit, LMWH receives a IIb recommendation.
LMWH Management: ACC/AHA GuidelinesLMWH Management: ACC/AHA Guidelines Anticoagulation Low molecular weight heparin
(LMWH)may be used as an
alternative to heparin (Class IIb) if:
–Age < 75–No renal dysfunction
“Enoxaparin (30 mg IV bolus followed by 1.0 mg/kg sq) used in combination with full-dose tenecteplase is the most comprehensively studied regimen in patients less than 75 years of age.”
Anticoagulation Low molecular weight heparin
(LMWH)may be used as an
alternative to heparin (Class IIb) if:
–Age < 75–No renal dysfunction
“Enoxaparin (30 mg IV bolus followed by 1.0 mg/kg sq) used in combination with full-dose tenecteplase is the most comprehensively studied regimen in patients less than 75 years of age.”
STEMI < 6 hSTEMI < 6 hLytic eligibleLytic eligible
Lytic choice by MDLytic choice by MD(TNK, tPA, rPA, SK)(TNK, tPA, rPA, SK)
ENOXENOX
< 75 y: 30 mg IV bolus < 75 y: 30 mg IV bolus SC 1.0 mg / kg q 12 h (Hosp DC)SC 1.0 mg / kg q 12 h (Hosp DC)
≥≥ 75 y: No bolus75 y: No bolus
SC 0.75 mg / kg q 12 h (Hosp DCSC 0.75 mg / kg q 12 h (Hosp DC))
CrCl CrCl << 30: 1.0 mg / kg q 24 30: 1.0 mg / kg q 24 hh
Double-blind, double-dummyDouble-blind, double-dummy
ASAASA
Day 30Day 3011°° Efficacy Endpoint: Death or Nonfatal MI Efficacy Endpoint: Death or Nonfatal MI1° Safety Endpoint: TIMI Major Hemorrhage1° Safety Endpoint: TIMI Major Hemorrhage
EXTRACT Protocol DesignEXTRACT Protocol Design
UFHUFH60 U / kg bolus (4000 U) 60 U / kg bolus (4000 U)
Inf 12 U / kg / h (1000 U / h)Inf 12 U / kg / h (1000 U / h)Duration: at least 48 hDuration: at least 48 hCont’d at MD discretionCont’d at MD discretion
N=20,478N=20,478
EXTRACT Primary End Point Death or Nonfatal MI
EXTRACT Primary End Point Death or Nonfatal MI
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pri
ma
ry E
nd
Po
int
(%)
Pri
ma
ry E
nd
Po
int
(%)
ENOX
UFH
Relative RiskRelative Risk0.83 (0.77 to 0.90)0.83 (0.77 to 0.90)
P<0.0001P<0.0001
Days Days
9.9%
12.0%
Lost to follow up = 3 Lost to follow up = 3
17% RRR
EXTRACT Outcomes at 30 DaysEXTRACT Outcomes at 30 Days
7.5
4.5
2.8
6.9
3
2.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Death Nonfatal MI Urg Revasc
8%8%
33%33%26%26%
P= 0.11 <0.0001 0.0008P= 0.11 <0.0001 0.0008
%%
EXTRACT Outcomes by PCI versus MedicalPrimary Outcome: Death/MI
EXTRACT Outcomes by PCI versus MedicalPrimary Outcome: Death/MI
0
5
10
15
PCI Medical Rx
ENOX
UFH
0
5
10
15
PCI Medical Rx
ENOX
UFH
%% 10.710.7
13.813.8
9.79.7
11.411.4
P= 0.001 0.0004P= 0.001 0.0004
Death or Nonfatal MI - Day 30 Major Subgroups
Death or Nonfatal MI - Day 30 Major Subgroups
B
B
B
> Median
< Median
Fibrin-specific
Streptokinase
Prior MI
No Prior MI
DM
No DM
Other
Anterior
0.5 1 2
PRIOR MI
OVERALLOVERALL
DIABETES
FIBRINOLYTIC
INFARCT
LOCATION
ENOX Better UFH BetterRelative Risk
TIME TO Rx
20,479
1123
1721
1720
1318
2312
17
Reduction In Risk (%)
>= 75
< 75AGE (y)
206
Female
MaleSEX 1816
All Interaction TestsAll Interaction TestsP = NSP = NS
P < 0.0001
10,256 Assigned ENOX10,256 Assigned ENOX
20,479 Patients Randomized into 20,479 Patients Randomized into ExTRACT-TIMI 25ExTRACT-TIMI 25
2,272 Underwent2,272 Underwent
PCI by 30 daysPCI by 30 days
22.8%22.8%
10,223 Assigned UFH10,223 Assigned UFH
2,404 Underwent2,404 Underwent
PCI by 30 daysPCI by 30 days
24.2%24.2%
EXTRACT PCI Study Profile
PCI Cohort: Primary EndpointDeath or Nonfatal MI by 30 days
PCI Cohort: Primary EndpointDeath or Nonfatal MI by 30 days
ENOX
DaysDays
13.8%
0055
1010
1515
00 55 1010 1515 2020 2525 3030
De
ath
or
MI (
%)
De
ath
or
MI (
%)
UFH
10.7%
RR 0.77RR 0.77p=0.001p=0.001
EXTRACT PCI Cohort: SafetyEXTRACT PCI Cohort: Safety
Event ENOX UFH RR P-Value n=2,238 n=2,377
TIMI Major Bleed 1.4% 1.6% 0.87 (0.55-1.39) 0.56
TIMI Minor Bleed 3.3% 2.4% 1.34 (0.95-1.88) 0.09
TIMI Major or 4.6% 4.0% 1.15 (0.88-1.51) 0.31 Minor Bleed
ICH 0.2% 0.4% 0.42 (0.13-1.35) 0.18
Stroke 0.3% 0.9% 0.30 (0.12-0.75) 0.006
Outcomes by 30 Days in Patients Undergoing PCI on Blinded Study Drug
Outcomes by 30 Days in Patients Undergoing PCI on Blinded Study Drug
16.7
2.4
13.0
1.8
0
5
10
15
20 UFH UFH (n=1,075)(n=1,075)
ENOX ENOX (n=1,103)(n=1,103)
%
% E
ven
tsE
ven
ts
Death or Nonfatal reMIDeath or Nonfatal reMI Major BleedMajor Bleed
RR 0.77RR 0.77P=0.002P=0.002
RR 0.75RR 0.75P=0.33P=0.33
Use of LMWH with Thrombolytics in STEMI: Non Cath Lab Centers
Use of LMWH with Thrombolytics in STEMI: Non Cath Lab Centers
ASA, NTG, Beta Blockers
Enoxaparin 30 mg IVP, 1 mg/kg sub q q12 hours (reduced in elderly)
TNK Weight Based Dosing (50 mg max) or Retavase 10 + 10
Treat Complications
Transfer to cath lab center if no resolution of ST changes or pain in 90 minutes (RESCUE PCI)
Avoid in patients >75 years old, CRF
ASA, NTG, Beta Blockers
Enoxaparin 30 mg IVP, 1 mg/kg sub q q12 hours (reduced in elderly)
TNK Weight Based Dosing (50 mg max) or Retavase 10 + 10
Treat Complications
Transfer to cath lab center if no resolution of ST changes or pain in 90 minutes (RESCUE PCI)
Avoid in patients >75 years old, CRF
ConclusionsConclusions Fibrinolytic Therapy remains a Class
IA recommendation in non-cath lab centers
Enoxaparin demonstrates advantages over UFH in conjunction with fibrinolysis, based on ASSENT 3
Enoxaparin should probably be avoided in CRF, elderly
EXTRACT TIMI 25 should answer many questions regarding enoxaparin in STEMI
Fibrinolytic Therapy remains a Class IA recommendation in non-cath lab centers
Enoxaparin demonstrates advantages over UFH in conjunction with fibrinolysis, based on ASSENT 3
Enoxaparin should probably be avoided in CRF, elderly
EXTRACT TIMI 25 should answer many questions regarding enoxaparin in STEMI
Utilization of Clopidogrel in STEMI
Utilization of Clopidogrel in STEMI
CURE: MI/Stroke/CV Death/Severe
Ischemia Within 24 h of Randomization
CURE: MI/Stroke/CV Death/Severe
Ischemia Within 24 h of Randomization
CURE, Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Ischemic Events; MI, myocardial infarction; CURE, Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Ischemic Events; MI, myocardial infarction; CV, cardiovascular; RRR, relative risk reduction; RR, relative risk.CV, cardiovascular; RRR, relative risk reduction; RR, relative risk.Adapted from Adapted from Yusuf S, et al. Yusuf S, et al. Circulation.Circulation. 2003;107:966-972. 2003;107:966-972.
Hours After RandomizationHours After Randomization
Cu
mu
lati
ve H
azar
d R
ates
Cu
mu
lati
ve H
azar
d R
ates
0.00.0
0.0050.005
0.0100.010
0.0150.015
0.0200.020
0.0250.025
00 22 44 66 88 1010 1212 1414 1616 1818 2020 2222 2424
RR = 0.67RR = 0.67P P = 0.003= 0.003
PlaceboPlacebo+ ASA+ ASA
ClopidogrelClopidogrel+ ASA+ ASA
33%33%RRRRRR
CLARITY TIMI 28 Study DesignCLARITY TIMI 28 Study Design
Fibrinolytic, ASA, HeparinFibrinolytic, ASA, Heparin
Clopidogrel300 mg + 75 mg qd
Coronary Angiogram(2-8 days)
Primary endpoint:Occludedartery (TIMI Flow Grade 0/1)or D/MI by timeof angio
Primary endpoint:Occludedartery (TIMI Flow Grade 0/1)or D/MI by timeof angio
randomize
Placebo
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in3491 patients, age 18-75 yrs with STEMI < 12 hours
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in3491 patients, age 18-75 yrs with STEMI < 12 hours
StudyDrug
StudyDrug
30-day clinical follow-up30-day clinical follow-up
Open-labelclopidogrelper MD in
both groups
Open-labelclopidogrelper MD in
both groups
Primary Endpoint:Occluded Artery (or D/MI thru Angio/HD)
Primary Endpoint:Occluded Artery (or D/MI thru Angio/HD)
15.0
21.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
Occ
lud
ed A
rter
y o
r D
eath
/MI
(%
)
PlaceboPlaceboClopidogrelClopidogrel
P=0.00000036P=0.00000036P=0.00000036P=0.00000036
Odds Ratio 0.64Odds Ratio 0.64(95% CI 0.53-0.76)(95% CI 0.53-0.76)
Odds Ratio 0.64Odds Ratio 0.64(95% CI 0.53-0.76)(95% CI 0.53-0.76)
1.00.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.6
ClopidogrelClopidogrelbetterbetter
PlaceboPlacebobetterbetter
n=1752 n=1739
36%Odds Reduction
36%Odds Reduction
CV Death, MI, RI Urg RevascCV Death, MI, RI Urg Revasc
days
Per
cen
tag
e w
ith
en
dp
oin
t (%
)P
erce
nta
ge
wit
h e
nd
po
int
(%)
05
1015
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
PlaceboPlacebo
ClopidogrelClopidogrel
Odds Ratio 0.80Odds Ratio 0.80(95% CI 0.65-0.97)(95% CI 0.65-0.97)
P=0.026P=0.026
20%20%20%20%
BleedingBleeding
Outcome Clopidogrel (%)
Placebo (%)
P value
Through angiography
TIMI major (Hgb >5 g/dL or ICH) 1.3 1.1 NS
TIMI minor (Hgb 3-5 g/dL) 1.0 0.5 NS
Intracranial hemorrhage 0.5 0.7 NS
Through 30 days
TIMI major 1.9 1.7 NS
In those undergoing CABG 7.5 7.2 NS
CABG w/in 5 d of study med 9.1 7.9 NS
TIMI minor 1.6 0.9 NS
CV Death, MI, or Strokefollowing PCI
CV Death, MI, or Strokefollowing PCI
02
46
8
0 10 20 30Days post PCI
Per
cen
tag
e w
ith
ou
tco
me
(%) No PretreatmentNo Pretreatment
Clopidogrel Clopidogrel PretreatmentPretreatment
46%46%46%46%
Odds Ratio 0.54Odds Ratio 0.54(95% CI 0.35-0.85)(95% CI 0.35-0.85)
P=0.008P=0.008
Odds Ratio 0.54Odds Ratio 0.54(95% CI 0.35-0.85)(95% CI 0.35-0.85)
P=0.008P=0.008
Conclusions: Clopidogrel in STEMIConclusions: Clopidogrel in STEMI
Addition of Clopidogrel to ED treatment of STEMI with fibrinolytics is useful and effective
In patients going to PCI, early treatment with clopidogrel is effective as well.
Addition of Clopidogrel to ED treatment of STEMI with fibrinolytics is useful and effective
In patients going to PCI, early treatment with clopidogrel is effective as well.
Reperfusion Guidelines:Fibrinolytics Versus PCIReperfusion Guidelines:Fibrinolytics Versus PCI
Reperfusion guidelinesReperfusion guidelines Comparing PCI to fibrinolysis*:
PCI demonstrates lower mortality PCI demonstrates lower reinfarction
rate PCI has a lower hemorrhagic stroke
rate
However, this is only likely to be significant if PCI can be performed within 90 minutes in a high volume center If there is greater than a 60 minute
delay, fibrinolysis is likely superior**
Comparing PCI to fibrinolysis*: PCI demonstrates lower mortality PCI demonstrates lower reinfarction
rate PCI has a lower hemorrhagic stroke
rate
However, this is only likely to be significant if PCI can be performed within 90 minutes in a high volume center If there is greater than a 60 minute
delay, fibrinolysis is likely superior***Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. The Lancet. 2003;361:13-20.
**Nallamothu BK, Bates ER. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything? Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:824-6.
Symptoms – balloon inflation (min)
On
e-ye
ar m
ort
alit
y (%
)
6 RCTs of 1° PCI by Zwolle Group 1994 – 2001N = 1,791
RR = 1.08 [1.01 – 1.16] for each 30 min delay(P = 0.04)
P < 0.000112
10
8
6
4
2
00 60 120 180 240 300 360
Time-delay to Treatment and MortalityTime-delay to Treatment and Mortality in 1 in 1°° Angioplasty for Acute MI: Angioplasty for Acute MI:
Every Minute Delay CountsEvery Minute Delay Counts
DeLuca G, et al. DeLuca G, et al. CirculationCirculation. 2004;109:1223.. 2004;109:1223.
PCI-related Time Delay (Door-to-balloon − Door to-needle)PCI-related Time Delay (Door-to-balloon − Door to-needle)
CircleCircle sizessizes = = sample size of the sample size of the individual study individual study
Solid lineSolid line = = weighted meta-regressionweighted meta-regression
Favors PCIFavors PCI
Favors LysisFavors Lysis
Benefits of PCI are LOST if PCI COSTS TOO MUCH TIME vs. Benefits of PCI are LOST if PCI COSTS TOO MUCH TIME vs. lytic therapylytic therapy
PP = 0.006 = 0.006
62 min62 min
Ab
solu
te R
isk
Dif
fere
nce
in
Dea
th (
%)
Ab
solu
te R
isk
Dif
fere
nce
in
Dea
th (
%)
1515
1010
55
00
-5-500 2020 4040 6060 8080 100100
PCI vs. Lysis: Is Timing (Almost) Everything ?PCI vs. Lysis: Is Timing (Almost) Everything ?
Nallamothu BK, Bates ER. Nallamothu BK, Bates ER. Am J CardiolAm J Cardiol. 2003:92:824.. 2003:92:824.
Actual time of inter-hospital transfer in the USActual time of inter-hospital transfer in the US
NRMI-4 data from 2002: Door to balloon time for STEMI
patients in the US, when transferred from a non-PCI center to a PCI center:
185 minutes Only 3% of patients received PCI in
less than 90 minutes!
NRMI-4 data from 2002: Door to balloon time for STEMI
patients in the US, when transferred from a non-PCI center to a PCI center:
185 minutes Only 3% of patients received PCI in
less than 90 minutes!Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:E1-E211.
Reperfusion guidelinesReperfusion guidelines
STEMI patients who have contraindications to fibrinolysis presenting within 12 hours of onset should undergo primary PCI (class I)
Class III (harmful) recommendations ST depression (unless posterior MI
suspected) Symptoms began > 24h prior
STEMI patients who have contraindications to fibrinolysis presenting within 12 hours of onset should undergo primary PCI (class I)
Class III (harmful) recommendations ST depression (unless posterior MI
suspected) Symptoms began > 24h prior
Reperfusion guidelinesReperfusion guidelines
Thrombolysis failure Rescue PCI is recommended for patients
experiencing cardiogenic shock after failed fibrinolysis
< 75 yo (class I)> 75 yo (class IIa)
Rescue PCI is recommended for patients experiencing hemodynamic or electrical instability, or continued ischemic symptoms after fibrinolysis (class IIa)
Rationale for Early Transfer to PCI capable hospital
Thrombolysis failure Rescue PCI is recommended for patients
experiencing cardiogenic shock after failed fibrinolysis
< 75 yo (class I)> 75 yo (class IIa)
Rescue PCI is recommended for patients experiencing hemodynamic or electrical instability, or continued ischemic symptoms after fibrinolysis (class IIa)
Rationale for Early Transfer to PCI capable hospital
Facilitated PCI Facilitated PCI Can the use of early antiplatelet and
antithrombin agents make PCI easier? Can the use of early antiplatelet and
antithrombin agents make PCI easier?
8%8%
23%23%
18%18%
32%32%
Gold et al 10 minCirculation. 1997; 95: 1755-1959.
GRAPE 45 minJACC. 1999; 33:1528-1532.
SPEED 60 minEHJ. 1999; 20:616 (3336).
TIMI-14 90 minCirculation. 1999; 99:2720-2732.
Fribrinolytic Effect of Abciximab Fribrinolytic Effect of Abciximab
TIMI Grade 3 Flow25% 50%
Study Time0
Experience Over Several Clinical TrialsExperience Over Several Clinical Trials
Cutlip, et al: ED Administration of Eptifibatide Prior to Primary PTCA in the Treatment of STEMI Am J Cardiol 2001;88:62-64
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
TIMI 2 TIMI 3 TIMI 2/3
PlaceboIntegrilin
56.7%
13.3%
Primary PCIPrimary PCIPrimary PCIPrimary PCI
STEMI < 6 HRS Undergoing Primary PCI STEMI < 6 HRS Undergoing Primary PCI (n=343)(n=343)
TITAN TIMI 34: Study DesignTITAN TIMI 34: Study Design
RANDOMIZERANDOMIZEOpen LabelOpen Label
RANDOMIZERANDOMIZEOpen LabelOpen Label
ASA 160-325 mg po ASA 160-325 mg po HEPARIN 60 U/kg bolus (Max 4000U) and 7U/kg HEPARIN 60 U/kg bolus (Max 4000U) and 7U/kg
infusion (Max 800 U/hr)infusion (Max 800 U/hr)
””EPTIFIBATIDE EPTIFIBATIDE
180/2.0/180180/2.0/180TRANSFER TO CATH TRANSFER TO CATH
LABLAB
DIAGNOSTIC ANGIODIAGNOSTIC ANGIO
PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Pre PCI TIMI Frame CountPRIMARY ENDPOINT: Pre PCI TIMI Frame CountPRIMARY ENDPOINT: Pre PCI TIMI Frame CountPRIMARY ENDPOINT: Pre PCI TIMI Frame Count
EPTIFIBATIDE EPTIFIBATIDE 180/2.0/180180/2.0/180
TRANSFER TO CATH TRANSFER TO CATH LABLAB
DIAGNOSTIC ANGIODIAGNOSTIC ANGIO
© © TIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by lawTIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by law
© © TIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by lawTIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by law
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Pre
- P
CI
TM
PG
3 (
%)
Pre
- P
CI
TM
PG
3 (
%)
EREREptifibatideEptifibatide
Cath Lab Cath Lab EptifibatideEptifibatide
24.3%24.3%
14.2%14.2%
p = 0.026p = 0.026
(41/169)(41/169) (20/141)(20/141)
p=0.025 adjusting for infarct locationp=0.025 adjusting for infarct location
Primary Analysis: Modified Intent-to-TreatPrimary Analysis: Modified Intent-to-Treat
TITAN-TIMI 34: Secondary Angiographic Endpoint TIMI Flow Grades
TITAN-TIMI 34: Secondary Angiographic Endpoint TIMI Flow Grades
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Pre
- P
CI
TIM
I 2
or
3 F
low
(%
)P
re -
PC
I T
IMI
2 o
r 3
Flo
w (
%)
EREREptifibatideEptifibatide
Cath Lab Cath Lab EptifibatideEptifibatide
46.2%46.2%
36.6%36.6%
(79/171)(79/171) (52/142)(52/142)
TIMI 2 or 3TIMI 2 or 3p = 0.087p = 0.087
24%19%p=NSp=NS
TIMI 3TIMI 3
TITAN-TIMI 34: Angiographic Perfusion ScoreTITAN-TIMI 34: Angiographic Perfusion Score
Integrates epicardial and myocardial perfusion
Integrates flow before and after PCI
Sum of the following:
TIMI Flow Grade Before PCI (0-3)
TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade Before PCI (0-3)
TIMI Flow Grade After PCI (0-3)
TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade After PCI (0-3)
Integrates epicardial and myocardial perfusion
Integrates flow before and after PCI
Sum of the following:
TIMI Flow Grade Before PCI (0-3)
TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade Before PCI (0-3)
TIMI Flow Grade After PCI (0-3)
TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade After PCI (0-3)
Total Angiographic Perfusion Score: 0 - 12Total Angiographic Perfusion Score: 0 - 12
Gibson CM. Am Heart J. 2004 Aug;148(2):336-40. Gibson CM. Am Heart J. 2004 Aug;148(2):336-40.
Failed 0-3; Partial 4-9; Failed 0-3; Partial 4-9; Full 10-12Full 10-12Failed 0-3; Partial 4-9; Failed 0-3; Partial 4-9; Full 10-12Full 10-12
© © TIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by lawTIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by law
TITAN-TIMI 34: Full Angiographic PerfusionTITAN-TIMI 34: Full Angiographic Perfusion
© © TIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by lawTIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by law
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
15
20
25
Fu
ll A
ng
iog
rap
hic
F
ull
An
gio
gra
ph
ic
Per
fusi
on
(A
PS
10-
12)
%
Per
fusi
on
(A
PS
10-
12)
%
EREREptifibatideEptifibatide
Cath Lab Cath Lab EptifibatideEptifibatide
21.1%21.1%
12.5%12.5%
p = 0.059p = 0.059
(32/152)(32/152) (16/128)(16/128)
Primary Analysis: Modified Intent-to-TreatPrimary Analysis: Modified Intent-to-Treat
Full Angiographic Perfusion previously defined in Gibson CM. Am Heart J. 2004 Aug;148(2):336-40. Full Angiographic Perfusion previously defined in Gibson CM. Am Heart J. 2004 Aug;148(2):336-40.
© © TIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by lawTIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by law
2.32.1
0
1
2
3
2.32.1
0
1
2
3
Dea
th (
%)
Dea
th (
%)
EREREptifibatideEptifibatide
Cath Lab Cath Lab EptifibatideEptifibatide
DeathDeathp = NSp = NS
2.9
7.1
0
2
4
6
8
2.9
7.1
0
2
4
6
8
CH
F
(%)
CH
F
(%)
EREREptifibatideEptifibatide
Cath Lab Cath Lab EptifibatideEptifibatide
n=173n=173 n=142n=142
Primary Analysis: Modified Intent-to-TreatPrimary Analysis: Modified Intent-to-Treat
TITAN-TIMI 34 Clinical Endpoints at Discharge/Day 5
TITAN-TIMI 34 Clinical Endpoints at Discharge/Day 5
CHFCHFp = 0.082p = 0.082
n=173n=173 n=142n=142
© © TIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by lawTIMI 2005. Duplication prohibited by law
OutcomeER
Eptifibatide (n=174)
Cath Lab Eptifibatide (n=142)
P-value
TIMI Major (Hgb >5 g/dL or ICH)
1.7% 3.5% NS
TIMI Minor (Hgb 3-5 g/dL) 5.2% 4.2% NS
TIMI Major or Minor 6.9% 7.8% NS
Transfusion PRBC 9.8% 7.0% NS
Stroke or ICH 0.0% 0.0% NS
Thrombocytopenia (Plt. < 100K)
2.3% 1.4% NS
TITAN-TIMI 34: Bleeding EventsTITAN-TIMI 34: Bleeding Events
Non CABG Through Discharge; Site AssessmentNon CABG Through Discharge; Site AssessmentPrimary Analysis: Modified Intent-to-TreatPrimary Analysis: Modified Intent-to-Treat
Facilitated PCIFacilitated PCI For Fibrinolytic Ineligible Patients
Cardiogenic Shock
Time to Balloon <90 minutes
ASA, NTG, BB
Heparin 4000/1000
Integrelin Bolus and Infusion
Clopidogrel 300 mg po
Rapid Transfer to Cath Lab
For Fibrinolytic Ineligible Patients
Cardiogenic Shock
Time to Balloon <90 minutes
ASA, NTG, BB
Heparin 4000/1000
Integrelin Bolus and Infusion
Clopidogrel 300 mg po
Rapid Transfer to Cath Lab
Facilitated PCIFacilitated PCI
Primary angioplasty or stent placement is the gold standard treatment of STEMI in cath lab centers.
ASA, NTG, Heparin weight based dosing
IIb/IIIa inhibitor either prior to or at the same time as PCI decreases reocclusion and has some fibrinolytic effects equal to streptokinase.
Benefits of cath over thrombolytics lost if time from door to cath lab greater than 90 minutes.
Primary angioplasty or stent placement is the gold standard treatment of STEMI in cath lab centers.
ASA, NTG, Heparin weight based dosing
IIb/IIIa inhibitor either prior to or at the same time as PCI decreases reocclusion and has some fibrinolytic effects equal to streptokinase.
Benefits of cath over thrombolytics lost if time from door to cath lab greater than 90 minutes.
QUESTIONS??QUESTIONS??