31
Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index John Cameron & Yih Lerh Huang ISS

Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

  • Upload
    nicole

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index. John Cameron & Yih Lerh Huang ISS. “ All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” – Tolstoy, in Anna Karenina. What is Socia l Cohesion?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Tracking Structural Development Processesthrough the Inter-group Cohesion Index

John Cameron & Yih Lerh HuangISS

Page 2: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

“All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” – Tolstoy, in Anna Karenina

Page 3: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

What is Social Cohesion?

“the ongoing process of developing a community of shared values, shared challenges and equal opportunity within Canada, based on a sense of trust, hope and reciprocity among all Canadians”

Policy Research Sub-Committee on Social Cohesion (Canada)

“a set of social processes that help instil in individuals the sense of belonging to the same community and the feeling that they are recognised as members of that community”

Commissariat Général du Plan (France)

Page 4: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Multi-dimensional

BelongingInclusion

ParticipationRecognition

Legitimacy

IsolationExclusionNon-involvementRejectionIllegitimacy

Common valuesSocial order

Social solidaritySocial networks

Place attachment

Civic cultureSocial controlWealth disparitiesSocial capitalIdentity

Jenson (1998) Kearns and Forrest (2000)

Equality Inequality Rajulton et al. (2007)

Page 5: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

The ISS Inter-group Cohesion Index measures

“the extent to which there is social cohesion between defined religious, ethnic, and linguistic groups, without degeneration into civil unrest or inter-group violence”

Indices of Social Development: Project Overview (2011)

Page 6: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Indicators:• Violent Demonstration• Deaths in Conflict• Inter-group Grievances• Civil Disorder• Internal Conflict• Terrorism Risk• Minority Rebellion Score• Log assassinations per log capita• Log guerrilla acts per log capita• Log riots per log capita• Terrorism• Log terrorist acts per log capita

Page 7: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Only countries with complete data sets are presented (n=96)

Page 8: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Inter-group Cohesion Index Summary

Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max1990 106 .5899623 .1009363 .0000000 .74474241995 103 .6572793 .0919776 .3840644 .80231222000 116 .5996492 .1341715 .2491713 .87444532005 158 .6093794 .0760247 .3515432 .74202202010 158 .5528531 .0854517 .0800696 .7008806 Includes all countries with a score for that chronological data-point

Page 9: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

ISDs Mean Scores Weighted by Country Population, 1990-2010

Page 10: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Only countries with complete data sets are presented (n=96)

Page 11: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index
Page 12: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Adverse events and the onset and depth of declines

• 1997 Asian Financial Crisis• Post-9/11• ‘War on Terror’

Page 13: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Low Income Group

Peaked around 1995 Peaked around 2000

Page 14: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Lower Middle Income Group

Peaked around 1995 Peaked around 2000

Page 15: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Upper Middle Income Group

Peaked around 1995 Peaked around 2000

Page 16: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

High Income Group

Peaked around 1995 Peaked around 2000

Page 17: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

10 Year Change

Peaked ~ 1995 Peaked ~ 2000 Mann-Whineytest

cohesion Index -0.079 -0.140 p<0.000

Page 18: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Average 10 Year Change post-‘peak’

Peaked ~ 1995 Peaked ~ 2000 Mann-Whineytest

cohesion Index -0.079 -0.140 p<0.000

gdppc growth 34.6% 19.4% p<0.000

Page 19: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index
Page 20: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index
Page 21: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index
Page 22: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

10 post-peak change: gdppc vs Inter-group Cohesion – High Income

Page 23: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

10 year change (2000-2010): gdppc vs Inter-group Cohesion – Upper Income

Page 24: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Only countries with complete data sets are presented (n=64)

Page 25: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Clubs & Associations Index’s correlation with Inter-group Cohesion Index

Page 26: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

Conclusion

• Significant decline in the Inter-group Cohesion Index between 1995 and 2010.

• Some ‘regional’ differences in the timing of the downturn• Greater resilliance in Cohesion scores and less impact on gdppc growth

rates in the 1995 cohort even when controlling for initial gdppc levels using two approaches

• ‘varieties of capitalism’• Small group solidarity as a response to structural insecurities

Page 27: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index
Page 28: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index
Page 29: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

10 post-peak change: gdppc vs Inter-group Cohesion – Lower Income

Page 30: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

10 post-peak change: gdppc vs Inter-group Cohesion – Lower Middle Income

Page 31: Tracking Structural Development Processes through the Inter-group Cohesion Index

10 post-peak change: gdppc vs Inter-group Cohesion – Upper Middle Income