36
Thinking about the Karabut experiment Peter Hagelstein 1 and Irfan Chaudhary 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2 University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore

Thinking about the Karabut experiment

  • Upload
    brita

  • View
    22

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Thinking about the Karabut experiment. Peter Hagelstein 1 and Irfan Chaudhary 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2 University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore. Vibrations to nuclear excitation. Can we go the other way?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Peter Hagelstein1 and Irfan Chaudhary2

1Massachusetts Institute of Technology2University of Engineering and Technology,

Lahore

Page 2: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Vibrations to nuclear excitation

Page 3: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Can we go the other way?

•Donor receiver model developed for converting

donor energy to oscillator excitation

•But can we go the other way?

•Is it possible to start with an excited oscillator, and

transfer the energy to two-level systems

•Is it possible to excite nuclei with vibrational

excitation?

•Donor-receiver model would say yes

Page 4: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Can it be demonstrated?

•Model predicts coherent energy exchange between

equivalent two-level systems with a large transition energy,

and an oscillator with a low transition energy

•Two-level systems can be atoms, molecules, nuclei, spin

systems

•Oscillator can be vibrational, electrical, plasmonic,

electromagnetic

•Many possibilities for systems to show the effect

•But can be demonstrate it between phonons and nuclei?

Page 5: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

What are lowest energy nuclear transitions?

P. L. Hagelstein, “Bird’s eye view of phonon models for excess heat in the Fleischmann-Pons experiment,” J. Cond. Mat. Nucl. Sci. (in press)

Page 6: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

201Hg transition at 1565 eV is optimum candidate

among stable nuclei to demonstrate effect. But the

coupling between the lattice and this transition is

weak. All we need is a strongly coupled system to

help convert the energy.

Page 7: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

11 2 2 2 2 2 2, 4 , ,G

n n n

V ng e v g v g

Recall that relevant oscillation frequency is

So, whether energy can be transferred at all depends on the parameters of the strongly-coupled system

Page 8: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

But we have an analytic model for the relevant

wavefunction of the strongly coupled system, and

we can compute the overlap matrix element

easily!

Page 9: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Excitation of 201Hg

1

1/32 2 2

2 0

1 0

Amount of energy transferred

determined by

=

So, better if weak transition energy

is low, oscillator energy is

big, and there are many strongly

coupled two level systems

E

V n S m

E

2 2 S m

Page 10: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

System design

We have considered a number of designs for a

system to demonstrate this effect. The first issue is

what the strongly coupled (receiver) transition

might be. After analyzing systematically all

possible transitions, it seems that an electronic

transition would provide the best coupling.

The design that results is big, and requires very

high (THz) frequency phonon mode.

Page 11: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Phased array collimation

An array of dipole antennas that are in phase can make a colliated beam.

Page 12: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Conceptual design

Hg containing

sample

ACME THz vibrational

source

1.5 keV collimated x-rays

Page 13: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Predicted spectrum is broad

Spread in phonon distribution that causes excitation will show up in the broadening of the line, and shift due to E2 in photon density of states; line will shift to lower energy due to electron promotion energy loss

Page 14: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Take away message

•Model predicts that we should be able to convert

vibrational energy to nuclear excitation

•Easiest if lower energy excitation

•Lowest energy excitation from ground state among

stable nuclei is 201Hg

•Consideration of design, estimation of physical

parameters

•Conversion would involve very broad line

•Coherent energy transfer would result in collimated

x-ray emission (like in high harmonic generation)

Page 15: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Karabut experiment

Page 16: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Karabut

•Alexander Karabut (Luch Institute, Moscow) showed

up at ICCF10 talking about having demonstrated an

x-ray laser

•Karabut was working with a high-current glow

discharge

•Karabut observed collimated x-ray radiation near

1.5 keV

•(No way for there to be an x-ray laser in this

experiment)

•Must be some alternate explanation…

Page 17: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Karabut experiment (ICCF10)

Collimated x-ray effect

seen with different metals

(Al, V, Fe, Zn, Mo, Pd, W,

others)

…and with different gasses (H2, D2, Kr, Xe)

Page 18: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Pinhole camera image of cathode

Collimated x-rays very bright, originate from cathode surface

Page 19: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Emission after turn off

Page 20: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

A. B. Karabut, E. A. Karabut, P. L. Hagelstein, “Spectral and temporal characteristics of x-ray emission from metal electrodes in a high-current glow discharge,” J. Cond. Mat. Nucl. Sci. (in press).

Page 21: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Collimated emission appears after discharge is

turned off, up to 1 msec and more

Page 22: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Diffuse emission during discharge

Page 23: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Bent mica spectrometer

X-ray spectrometer: 1– cathode holder, 2– cathode sample, 3 – vacuum discharge chamber, 4 – anode, 5 –15 Be screen , 6 – input slit of spectrometer, 7 – crystals holder, 8 – curved mica crystal, 9 – x-ray film, 10 – area of reflection spectra , 11 – input and output cooling water.

Page 24: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Diffuse Kr L-shell emission

X-ray spectra for Pd and Al cathodes taken in Kr gas showing characteristic L-shell emission (denoted as 3 and 4 in the spectra) near 1.6 keV (the L1 and L2 transitions are listed at 1.581 keV and at 1.580 keV). Minor differences between the observed and known energy may be due to the use of the normal incidence grating formula.

Page 25: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

The Kr L-shell line is diffuse and originates from

the cathode surface (not from the gas). It shows

up in the spectrum a bit off due to the way the

data was analyzed.

Page 26: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Diffuse continuum emission

Page 27: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Spectrum of continuum

Pd, D2 gas

Page 28: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Voltage dependence

Page 29: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

The diffuse continuum emission is a broad

feature that originates from the cathode

surface. The width depends on the applied

voltage (and hence current). When narrowest

it is centered near 1.2 keV.

Page 30: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Collimated beamlets

Page 31: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Interpret the curves as due to a minor change in

direction of the beam during the emission. The

emission is sufficiently bright to damage (cause

solarization) film.

Page 32: Thinking about the Karabut experiment
Page 33: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Beams seen long after discharge

Data collected for 20 hours after the discharge turned off

Page 34: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Collimated emission taken long after the discharge

is turned off is particularly interesting because

effect can only be due to vibrational effects (no

possible residual from the discharge).

Page 35: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Gozzi’s experiment (ICCF6)

From absorption coefficient of Pd cathodes, can estimate the energy of the gamma signal. Gozzi et al obtained an energy of 89 keV, and suggested that it was due to 109mAg

12 J of gamma emission,9.3 MJ of excess heat

Page 36: Thinking about the Karabut experiment

Take away message

•Karabut sees collimated and diffuse x-ray emission

•Diffuse emission during discharge

•Characteristic x-ray lines and broad continuum feature

•Collimated emission extremely bright, from after turn off

•Beams from around 700 eV to about 5 keV

•Propose that this is due to vibrational coupling to 201Hg

•Beamlets near 90 keV seen by Gozzi