Upload
lyminh
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE MEANINGS OF TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE
ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT STUDENTS
A Thesis Presented to
Graduate Program in English Language Studies
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of
Magister Humaniora (M.Hum.)
in
English Language Studies
by
Kristina Estisari
Student Number: 146332020
THE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
STUDIES
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2016
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
i
THE MEANINGS OF TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE
ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT STUDENTS
A Thesis Presented to
Graduate Program in English Language Studies
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of
Magister Humaniora (M.Hum.)
in
English Language Studies
by
Kristina Estisari
Student Number: 146332020
THE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
STUDIES
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2016
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
A T}IESIS
TIIE MEAI\trNG$ OT TEACHTIT{C E}IGLISH TO TIM, ACCOT}NTINGEtrPARTMENT $fi'I}ENTS
Dr. J. BismokoThesis Advisor
,-t,t...,,il--'lij''l I '.:_+;q1a1::1..-r.'diB-;.-
r.-t :i:=:ii.-:..+f?!;=,i: :
. ::l*i"{=: lr.-.::jti=-1--l- '';+:---.-'-i#-€,:'. -':#=:1.: -
:i.,'" r-: . -
.t
1,.'lI
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
A THESIS
TIIE MEANINGS OF TEACIIING EN-GLISII TO TITE ACCOUNTINGDEPARTMENT STUDENTS
Presented by
Kristina EstisariStudent Number: 146332020
Yogyakarta, 24th Octob er 2016The Graduate School Director
lll
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
-rf:il.]l::lej.-e:rry
STATEIITENT OT ORIGINALITY
This is to certiff that alt the ideas, plrrzrses, aad sentences, unless otherwise stste4
are mine. I understand the full consequenees including degree cancellation if I
took somebody else's ideas, phrases, or sentences witrout proper reference.
,lr.q
"l
,i:
I
I
.r.;'l
I
I
:.: tl
''l
: '.ttt-f,-: r:,i1ta::I:a.. L
'j .-C.:.. . i:*ar*:li+- -
i':;-, lil - i.;.+--ra.= -::.:-:;i:=!i ;ir: i>.: r'.##-'EE ::
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
-
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAHUNTUK KEPENTINGAII AKADEMIS
Yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini, saya mahasiswi universitas Sanata Dharma:
Nama : Kristina EstisariNIM :146332020
Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, saya memberikan kepada PerpustakaanUniversitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul:
THE MEANINGS OF TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE ACCOUNTINGDEPARTMENT STUDENTS
beserta perangkat yang diperlukan (bila ada). Dengan demikian, saya memberikankepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan,mengalihkan dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalandata, mendistribusikannya di internet atu media lain untuk kepentingan akademistanpa perlu meminta ijin maupun mernberikan royalty kepada saya selama tetapmencanfumkan nama saya sebagai penulis.
Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya.Dibuat di YogyakartaPada tanggat: i+ OttoUer b0t6
Kristina Estisari
ang menyatakan
WY
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the Almighty God, Jesus
Christ, the Holy Spirit and Mother Mary for the blessings in the process of
finishing this thesis. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis
advisor, Dr. J. Bismoko. Thank you Sir, for your guidance and knowledge you
have shared during my study and my research. Thank you for your patience and
willingness. I would also like to thank my thesis reviewers, F.X. Mukarto, Ph.D.,
and Dr. B.B. Dwijatmoko, M.A. Thank you for your suggestions and your
corrections Sir. I would also like to thank all the lecturers of ELS/KBI, Dr. E.
Sunarto, M.Hum., Josephine Sri Murwani Pudji Lestari, M.Hum., Dr. Fr.B.Alip
M.Pd., M.A., Paulus Sarwoto, Ph.D., and Dr. Patrisius Mutiara Andalas S.J. for
the insightful teaching. You will always be my role models in teaching my
students. I would also like to thank Mbak Marni,Pak Mulyadi, Steve, Ester and
Tyas for always helping me kindly and sincerely during my study.
I would like to thank my participants in this research, Ms. Vera and Ms.
Wedi (pseudo names) from the Accounting Depatment of Sanata Dharma
University. Thank you ladies, I have got a lot of meaningful experience from both
of you. I would also like to thank Drs. YP. Supardiyono, M.Si., Ak., QIA, CA, the
Head of the Accounting Department, Sanata Dharma University and his staff for
giving me permission and helping me to do the research in the Accounting
Department.
I would like to thank my family: my husband Nathanael Aditya Ristyanto
who always supports me with his love and life, my late mother Irene Mulyati, I
know you are always by my side in every kind of situation. This thesis is for you
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
Mom. I would also like to thank my father, P.Y. Sucipto, my sisters: Sr. M.
Gerarda (Mila) FSGM, Wulan, Sesi, and Tata for their support and love. I would
also like to thank Sr. M. Fransis FSGM and STIE Gentiaras, Bandar Lampung
who have supported me and gave me a chance to continue my study.
I would also like to thank my friends: Ce Vivi, Demi, Caca, Marita,Rini,
Eli, Sari, Martha, Kiki, Anita, Retno, Pipit, Wawan, Indra, Adit, Pak Kosmas,
Gatri, Tiara, Dita, Fafa and all KBI friends who cannot be mentioned one by one,
thank you for the support, prayers, and love. I would also like to thank my house
mates in Gang Parkit 7: Nata, Tari, Diah, Irene, Dian, Ivah, Dewi, Nindya, Tesa,
Tira, and Ayu for their sharing of life and love.
Last but not least, I would like to thank all people who have supported me
with their prayers and efforts so that I could finish my study well. Thank you.
May Lord bless you all.
Kristina Estisari
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................. i
APPROVAL PAGE........................................................................................ . ii
DEFENSE APPROVAL PAGE ...................................................................... iii
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ................................................................ iv
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI................................. v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................ vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................ viii
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................ xii
LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................. xiii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... xiv
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... xv
ABSTRAK ........................................................................................................ xvi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND OF STUDY .................................................................. 1
B. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION ............................................................... 4
C. PROBLEM LIMITATION ....................................................................... 6
D. PROBLEM FORMULATION .................................................................. 6
E. RESEARCH GOAL .................................................................................. 7
F. RESEARCH BENEFIT ............................................................................ 8
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW
A. THEORETICAL REVIEW ....................................................................... 10
1. Meaning ................................................................................................ 10
a. Empirical Meaning ......................................................................... 12
b. Transcendental Meaning ................................................................ 13
2. Self-actualization .................................................................................. 14
3. Lived Experience .................................................................................. 17
4. Awareness............................................................................................. 23
5. Teaching English .................................................................................. 24
a. Teaching English as a World Language ........................................... 26
b. The English Teaching in the Accounting Department ..................... 27
6. Accounting Students............................................................................. 29
B. RELATED RESEARCH REPORTS ......................................................... 30
C. FRAMEWORK OF UNDERSTANDING ................................................ 33
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY
A. RESEARCH METHOD ............................................................................. 37
B. RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................................... 39
1. Nature and Sources of Text .................................................................... 40
2. Instruments ............................................................................................. 42
3. Text Gathering ....................................................................................... 43
4. Text Analysis ......................................................................................... 44
C. TRUSTWORTHINESS ............................................................................. 48
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
x
CHAPTER IV DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION
A. DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 50
1. Starting the Class
a. Preparing and Designing the Materials ......................................... 50
b. Selecting the References ............................................................... 56
c. Beginning the Class................................................................ ....... 59
2. Teaching the Lesson
a. Delivering the Lesson.................................................................... 64
b. Managing the Class ....................................................................... 69
c. Dealing with Weak Students ......................................................... 73
3. Finishing the Class
a. Assessing the Students .................................................................. 78
b. Giving Assignments or Homework...................................... ......... 82
B. INTERPRETATION
1. Autonomy ......................................................................................... 84
2. Awareness .......................................................................................... 87
3. Understanding/Empathy .................................................................... 91
4. Self-actualization .............................................................................. 93
5. Struggle .............................................................................................. 98
6. Equity ................................................................................................. 102
7. Disappoinment ................................................................................... 104
8. Feeling Proud of the Students. ........................................................... 106
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xi
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION, RECOMMENDATION
A. CONCLUSION .......................................................................................... 109
B. IMPLICATIONS ....................................................................................... 110
C. RECOMMENDATION ............................................................................. 111
BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................... 113
APPENDICES ................................................................................................ 117
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (A Rectified Version) .................. 15
Figure 2. Research Design ............................................................................ 41
Figure 3. The Steps of Text Processing ........................................................ 43
Figure 4. The Steps of Text Analysis ............................................................ 46
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiii
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page
Appendix 1. Ms. Widi Interview Transcript .............................................. 117
Appendix 2. Ms. Vera First Interview Transcript ...................................... 125
Appendix 3. Ms. Vera Second Interview Transcript .................................. 148
Appendix 4. Permission Letter ................................................................... 161
Appendix 5. Ms. Vera’s Syllabus of Bahasa Inggris 2 .............................. 162
Appendix 6. Ms. Widi’s Syllabus of Bahasa Inggris (MKU). ................... 165
Appendix 7. Ms. Widi’s Lesson Plan of Unit 1 ......................................... 166
Appendix 8. Bahasa Inggris Textbook Sample ( Unit 1) . ....................... 168
Appendix 9. Syllabus for Bahasa Inggris 1 from the University ............... 182
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
PFT : Pre-figured Themes
ET : Emergent Themes
E : Empirical meaning
T : Transcendental meaning
ET : Emergent Themes
AU : Autonomy
CR : Creativity
AW : Awareness
EM : Emphaty
ST : Struggle
SA : Self-actualization
EQ : Equity
FPS : Feeling Proud of the Students
DIS : Disappoinment
ESP : English for Specific Purposes
TOEFL : Test of English as a Foreign Language
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xv
ABSTRACT
Kristina Estisari. 2016. The Meanings of Teaching English to the Accounting
Department Students. Yogyakarta: The Graduate Program in English Language
Studies, Sanata Dharma University.
The increased demand for professionals who are knowledgeable in
business and management especially in the accounting field is accompanied by a
growing need for English for Business and Economics. One of the problems is
how to teach the English itself, whether teaching it as a content course or not. If
the teachers teach English as a content course, they must be experts in Accounting
and master English. The students also have to spend their extra time learning
Accounting through English. However, most of the teachers who teach English in
Accounting department are not content teachers. Related to that, this study aims to
investigate how teachers who are not content teachers situate themselves in
relation to making an effective learning-teaching process for their development as
professionals and humans.
To get a meaningful description of teaching English to accounting
department students, I have formulated the research question “What is the
meaning of teaching English to accounting department students?” This question
was answered through in-depth interviews, document checking and interpretation
of the text. The research involved two teachers who are not content teachers as the
participants. The participants were two of the English lecturers at the Accounting
Department, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. The experiences were
processed by transcribing the texts, coding, identifying the elements of theme
development, and determining the emergent themes. Since it is a
phenomenological and hermeneutical study, the result is the description and
interpretation of the participants’ narrative.
After describing the teachers’ lived experiences in a form of narrative, the
researcher intepreted the texts. From the interpretation of the texts, the meanings
of teaching English to the accounting department students could be employed.
The result is all the meanings are transcendental meanings.They are autonomy,
awareness, understanding/empathy, self-actualization, struggle, equity,
disappoinment and feeling proud of the students. Based on the discussion, the
teaching English to the accounting department students enabled teachers
themselves to be more self-actualized both as teachers and as human which means
the ultimate goal of this research has been achieved.
Keywords: meaning, teaching English, accounting department student
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xvi
ABSTRAK
Kristina Estisari. 2016. The Meanings of Teaching English to the Accounting
Department Students. Yogyakarta: The Graduate Program in English Language
Studies, Sanata Dharma University.
Permintaan yang meningkat akan profesional yang memiliki pengetahuan
dalam bisnis dan manajemen khususnya dalam bidang akuntansi diiringi oleh
tumbuhnya kebutuhan akan kelas bahasa Inggris yang mengajarkan Bisnis dan
Ekonomi. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana mengajarkan bahasa Inggris itu
sendiri, apakah mengajarkan bahasa Inggris sebagai kelas dengan bahasa Inggris
bertujuan khusus atau tidak. Jika dosen mengajarkan bahasa Inggris sebagai kelas
bahasa Inggris untuk tujuan khusus, dosen tersebut harus ahli dalam bidang
Akuntansi dan menguasai bahasa Inggris.Para mahasiswa juga harus menyediakan
waktu lebih untuk belajar Akuntansi melalui bahasa Inggris. Akan tetapi
kebanyakan dosen yang mengajar bahasa Inggris di jurusan Akuntansi bukanlah
dosen yang menguasai Akuntansi. Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, penelitian ini
bertujuan untuk mencari tahu bagaimana dosen yang bukan dosen Akuntansi
menempatkan diri mereka sendiri terkait dengan pembuatan proses belajar
mengajar yang efektif untuk pengembangan diri mereka sendiri sebagai seorang
profesional dan manusia.
Untuk mendapatkan gambaran yang bermakna dari mengajar bahasa
Inggris pada mahasiswa jurusan Akuntansi, peneliti membuat suatu pertanyaan.
Pertanyaan tersebut adalah “Apakah makna dari mengajar bahasa Inggris kepada
mahasiswa jurusan Akuntansi?” Pertanyaan ini dijawab melalui wawancara
mendalam, peninjauan dokumen, dan interpretasi atas hasil yang didapat.
Penelitian ini melibatkan dua orang dosen yang bukan dosen Akuntansi yang
mengajar bahasa Inggris di jurusan Akuntansi Universitas Sanata Dharma,
Yogyakarta sebagai peserta. Pengalaman mereka diproses dengan cara
mentranskrip rekaman kedalam teks, memberi kode, mengidentifikasi elemen
dari pengembangan tema, dan menentukan tema. Setelah itu teks di intepretasikan
untuk menemukan maknanya. Karena ini adalah penelitian hermeneutik
fenomenologi maka hasilnya adalah deskripsi dan interpretasi atas narasi peserta.
Setelah mendeskripsikan pengalaman hidup para dosen dalam bentuk
narasi, peneliti kemudian mengintepretasikan teks. Dari interpretasi atas teks ini,
makna dari mengajar bahasa Inggris kepada mahasiswa jurusan Akuntansi dapat
diperoleh. hasilnya adalah semua makna adalah makna transenden. Makna
tersebut yaitu otonomi, kepedulian, pengertian atau empati, aktualisasi diri,
perjuangan, kesetaraan, kekecewaan, dan perasaan bangga terhadap
mahasiswa.Berdasarkan diskusi, mengajar bahasa Inggris kepada mahasiswa
jurusan Akuntansi membantu dosen untuk lebih mengaktualisasikan diri baik
sebagai dosen maupun sebagai manusia sehingga tujuan utama dari penelitian ini
telah tercapai.
Kata kunci: makna, mengajar bahasa Inggris, mahasiswa jurusan
Akuntansi
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This introductory chapter contains rationale of why this research is
conducted. It presents reasons of the importance of this study along with the
context in current education in Indonesia. Those reasons explain both validity and
feasibility of this research. This chapter consists of the background of the study,
the problem identification, the problem limitation, the statement of research
questions, the research goals and the research benefits.
A. BACKGROUND OF STUDY
The mastery of a foreign language, especially English becomes one of the
requirements for accounting students since English enables them to communicate
better with people from other countries, especially in this globalization era where
Indonesia has to compete with all countries in all aspects especially in business
and economics. AFTA (Asian Free Trade Association) and AEC (ASEAN
Economic Community) are some of the products of globalization which are
recently experienced by Asian countries. Considering the rise, the development
of learning English as an international language and the quality of human
resources are becoming immediate concern. Education is a key of the
development. In Indonesia, although English is considered as a foreign language,
the competence in mastering English is a must. It is supported by the Indonesian
Education Ministry’s Policy no. 68 which states about the internal and external
challenge that Indonesian is facing. In relation with it, people are expected to be
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
competent in their own majors. English, in this case, is a language which enables
people to actively participate in their own fields to solve problems in any aspects
of life according to their majors. It is the language which enables people to
cooperate and participate in international community to solve the challenge that
the world facing. English has become an important key to master any fields as
textbooks are usually written in English. Moreover, it is spoken worldwide. For
the accounting students, after they graduated from the accounting department,
they will be in business world. They need the communicative skills in English
particularly speaking and listening skills in order to build the good interpersonal
relationship which will help them in business communication. They also need
reading and writing skills in order to build good ability in doing business
transactions.
However, teaching English is not easy when it has something to do with
teaching English to students who are not from English department, in this case to
the accounting department students. There are some expectation for English
teachers who teach English to accounting students from the society, the institution
and the students. The societies, those who worked in accounting field, expected
that the accounting graduates were well prepared and equipped with English when
they were in the college. Indirectly, teachers must be able to see widely the real
need of English by the accounting department students to make the material
practical in use afterward.
Moreover, it was difficult to find teachers who mastered both accounting
field and English. Therefore, the English teachers who taught the accounting
students were demanded to know more about accounting field. Somehow, if the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
teachers could not master the materials well it might raise the feeling of disability,
guilty, and resulting in unprofessional way in teaching. The institution itself relied
on the teacher for the teaching with the expectation that the teacher would develop
the materials and the result later was that the students were competent enough to
work and practice the language.
The students somehow also expected that the teacher mastered the English
used in accounting field and was able to transfer the knowledge well. The students
who already learnt about accounting in some ways knew about accounting field
better than the teachers. Teachers who were not ready with this would feel
underestimated or even intimidated by the students. Moreover the students
demanded also that they got knowledge which was really useful and functional for
them later on.
Furthermore the meaning of teaching English to the accounting students
department is not only empirical which means can be observed such as the
improvement of teaching skills but it also involves transcendent meaning which is
beyond what is observable. Transcendent meaning is related to the moment in
which teachers have the experience which is somehow difficult to explain; the
experience in which teachers have become more self-actualized not only as
teachers but also as human. It is when they feel that there is something beyond
daily experience.
To sum up, accounting field became the interest of this study since I knew
that the accounting department is everywhere but the reference books of teaching
English to accounting students are limited. In the department, English was taught
since the students need to master it to fulfill the demand of doing the job. based on
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
the studies above, this project is still feasible and reliable to be conducted. It is
understood that in teaching English, in order to have better communication, there
has to be a reflection where teachers see again what they have done and relate it
with the meaning implied on teaching English so that they become more
empowered. Besides, both teachers’ and students’ emphatic understanding are
needed to meet the goal of learning-teaching English language particularly in
order to be better able to come to an understanding of the deeper meaning of an
aspect of teachers experiences in teaching English in the context of the whole
teachers’ experience.
Based on the awareness and the understanding above, I placed my interest
on the experience of the English teaching to accounting department students.
Hopefully it will contribute to the improvement of human life quality and current
education in Indonesia.
B. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
The teaching of English to accounting department students involves many
considerations during the process of preparations and the teaching itself. It is no
wonder that there might be many problems arise that can be recognized. As stated
above that the competence of the accounting students become the main reasons of
the teaching of English to the students in the department. The competence cannot
be achieved without well preparation like the arrangement of the syllabus, the
choice of authentic materials, and the exposure of the use of English, or
competence or expert teacher in accounting field.
In Indonesia, the teaching of English in department or higher education is
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
arranged and approved by the government as stated in the policies and known as
national curriculum. Anyway, the department is given its autonomy to arrange the
teaching method, the material, and the arrangement of the teaching. All those
things are well arranged in the syllabus. Therefore, the syllabus of every
department or higher education might be different.
The selection of the topic is closely related to the materials and it will
build the type of the syllabus. The type of the syllabus offers the choices of the
teaching material. For accounting department, we have many options like teaching
the grammar, the expressions used, the tasks, or the function of the language. The
significant matter is that we have to match the goal of the teaching with the topic,
materials, and tasks.
Another option for the English teaching is whether we teach English as the
content course or not. English for academic purposes offers the teaching in many
ways. The content course allows the learner learns the accounting materials using
English language. Of course it needs extra energy spent since the teacher must be
expert on the accounting field and master English, and also the learners have to
spend their extra time leaning accounting field through English. However, the
teachers who participate in this research are not content teachers. They are English
teachers who teach General English in accounting department. Therefore it is
interesting to know how they are dealing with teaching matters which is too
general for fulfilling accounting students’ needs.
Since the problems related to the teacher and the teaching were quite
unique and complex, I am interested in discovering more about the teacher’s
experience in teaching English to accounting department students. The interesting
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
part is that the teacher must master the accounting field and English language.
Whether this phenomenon is right or not, it will be answered in this study. The
teacher’s lived experience became the focus of this study, so I intended to look
deeper about the experiences that were meaningful to the teacher. I will try to get
information on the whole experience in teaching.
C. PROBLEM LIMITATION
Considering that there were so many aspects related to the while the writer’s
time, ability, and fund were limited, the writer limited the problem of the research
only to the teacher’s lived experience. Since this research is on teacher’s lived
experience, there are two participants in this study, who are the English teachers.
The purpose of the study is to tell the shared lived experience of the teacher on
teaching English to Accounting students.
The study of the lived experience was related to the experience of the
participants and in this case was the experience in teaching English to accounting
department students. So, the experience elaborated as the answer of the research
questions later was limited on the experience of the year or years passed by the
teacher in teaching English to accounting students. Conducting in-depth
interviews with the teachers are very important to get the shared lived experience
of the teachers.
D. PROBLEM FORMULATION
The English teaching in the study is in the range of classroom situation and
learning activity which are conducted mostly by the teachers. The teachers’ lived
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
experience is seen from the teachers’ action in teaching English to their
Accounting department students. Lived experience is what people do after having
certain understanding, belief, feeling, and intention. In this case, the context of the
action is teaching English to accounting students. Therefore, the problem question
of this research addresses the following question: What is the meaning of teaching
English in the accounting department to the teachers?
E. RESEARCH GOAL
The research goal is based on the problem formulation above. The goal is
to describe and interpret teachers’ meaningful lived experience in teaching
English to the Accounting students department. The description and interpretation
provides a significant understanding of the nature of teaching English to
accounting department students. It can also enrich participants to be more
reflective and self-actualized, as well as audiences in having an emphatic
understanding and equity regarding teaching English to accounting department
students. Doing a reflective description has a chance to develop one’s self-
actualization.
The texts (anecdotes) can also provide a productive framework for the
participants to consider commitment and dedication toward their own
development as professionals and humans. These assumption will help
participants, audiences, as well as the researcher to determine the best preference
and solution for the same phenomenon. It essentially becomes good references for
English teachers in university or college to consider their own teaching method.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
F. RESEARCH BENEFIT
It is expected this research can provide significant contributions for the
educational field, especially in teaching learning process. The study provide
scientific benefit for professional who are concerned with English education. It
helps showing the meaning of the life world of teaching English to accounting
department students as lived experience by the participants. The information can
increase understanding of English teaching to accounting students. This
understanding is also valuable, especially for English Languange Studies and
English education science, this research can be the consideration for educational
development in teaching English to Accounting students. To the students of
English Education, this research can develop English teaching for accounting
students in term of English for academic purposes. To the Accounting students,
this research can give input for the evaluations and improvements of English
teaching at accounting department so the students can achieve more knowledge
and understanding. In other words, the result of this study will give contribution to
the improvement of English language studies particularly in Indonesia.
For practical benefit, it will improve the understanding on the English
teaching, especially to accounting department students, the teachers, the
researcher and the participants. For the teachers, this research can be a reference
especially for other teachers who teach similar students. For the researcher, this
research has benefit to better emphatic understanding that leads to the self-
actualization. And finally for the participants, the research can be a reflective tool
for their own performance. It is hoped that they will commit to their work by
being reflective. They will perform more efficiently and productively. It is also
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
hoped that this study will be meaningful experiences to them. The participants are
hoped to become more autonomous in making decisions towards effective
teaching learning activities as their main duties. Through autonomy, the teachers
will become more empowered and able to do self-actualization in the profession
so that finally the teachers can make more sustainable improvement in teaching so
that the students will learn better.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter attempts to build up pre-understanding based on relevant
literature. It consists of three major sections namely (1) theoretical review, (2)
related research reports, and (3) framework of pre-understanding.
A. THEORETICAL REVIEW
In this chapter, some related stories which become the theoretical background of
this study are presented. The theories are related to the variables involved in the
study.
1. Meaning
The concept of meaning is proposed by Ferdinand de Saussure through the
explanation of a famous concept of the signifier and the signified. Saussure as
quoted in Hall (2003: p. 31) as written in Marleku (n.d.) states, “...a sign as being
composed by a signifier-the form which sign takes- and the signified- the idea or
the concept it represents.” A sign always has an idea that it refers to. The meaning
of the sign is something which is constructed. Therefore, it is not suddenly there.
Aspers declared that the central concept of meaning in the social sciences is
understanding. Understanding is intimately connected to meaning. He further
states that the meanings come in structures and accomplish meaning in relation to
other meanings. Reszke (2011) confirms that the nature of understanding is the
central concern in hermeneutic and entering to understand compels one to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
consider the other person. Hermeneutics is the process of deciphering which goes
from manifest content and meaning to latent or hidden meaning (Palmer, 1969).
Meaning for several individuals of their lived experiences of a concept or a
phenomenon becomes the central of description of phenomenology. The basic
purpose of phenomenology is to reduce individual experiences with a
phenomenon to a description of the universal essence (Creswell, 2007). Manen
(1990) explifates that phenomenological questions are meaning questions which
ask for the meaning and significance of certain phenomena. It can be more
understood, so that, on the basis of this understanding one may be able to act more
thoughtfully and more tactfully in certain situations. As the study aims to interpret
the meaning of learning English of the participants, it is clear here what meaning I
intend to see. Furthermore, he describes phenomenological research as caring,
thoughtful act, because the researcher seeks to know the essential to being.
Moustakas (1994) additionally states that the meaning is created when the object
as it appears in our consciousness mingles with the object in nature.
Husserl’s as cited by Lindseth that in describing the essence of
experiences cannot be heard without narration. To come to the meaning of a
phenomenon we have to tell stories, which express our experiences of such
positioning. These stories reveal the meaning of experiences in our lives. We have
to produce texts to be able to thoroughly examine the meaning structure of a
phenomenon as a part of our life world- and thereby reveal the essential meaning
of that phenomenon. Thus, the essential meaning must be studied and revealed in
the interpretation of text.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
In one of her articles, Eilifsen (2011) states that in phenomenological
writing, the phenomenon the research tries to reveal is in the center. The purpose
of phenomenological reearch is to bring the phenomenon to light. Anecdotes can
help throw the light upon other experiences. She moreover clarifies that in
everyday life we tell stories and we do not dwell on what these stories are actually
telling us; their meaning may slip by us. They are actually much more; they tell
more than words can express. In relation to this study, the experience of teaching
English is thus so much more than words to describe exactly what teaching
English means to them.
a. Empirical Meaning
According to Van Manen (1997), phenomenology is the science of
phenomena. He cites Husserls for this discipline endeavors to describe how the
world is constituted and experienced through conscious acts. He also states that
phenomenology always asks the question of what is the nature or meaning of
something. The first meaning that I try to find out from this study is an empirical
one that means deriving knowledge from experience alone, based on observation,
investigation and experimentation as opposed to theoretical knowledge (Oxford
American Dictionary and Thesaurus). Then the empirical meaning refers to a
meaning grasped from one’s experience as he/she lived through it. Particularly,
what teaching English means to the participant based on what they have done,
felt, and thought through it. They may be getting better teaching skills, better
work, etc, that those are what is called hominization.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
b. Trancendental Meaning
The ultimate meaning that I try to discover is transcendental meaning. Van
Ane (1990) specifies that phenomenological human science sponsors a certain
concept of progress that is the progress of humanizing human life and humanizing
human institutions to help human beings to become increasingly thoughtful and
thus better prepared to act tactfully in situations. Maslow has proposed a
definition of being transcendent. Maslow (1979) as quoted by Fernando (2002)
states that transcenders are those who transcend, who live more at the level of
being...who are more inclined to have had peak experiences, which are
experiences of ectasy, rapture, bliss, the greatest joy, awe, mystery, humility,
surrender and the happiest moments in life.
Maslow then also explains some types of transcendence. From all types of
transcendence, some definitions of transcendence types which are the most
appropriate for this research are taken. The first type of transcendence is
transcendence of one’s past. It is about understanding ourselves for everything
that we have done. If we feel that what we have done is wrong then, we need to
forgive ourselves. “it means transcendence of remorse, regret, guilt, shame,
embarassment, and the like” (Maslow, 1979: p. 261). The second type of
transcendence is it is as mystical experience. It is “Mysitic fusion, either with
another person or with the whole cosmos or with anything in between.” (Maslow,
1979: p. 261). It is the sense of belonging with the universe and all the people in
it. It is the feeling of connectedness to a bigger world; that we are a part of a
bigger thing. The third type of transcendence is love. It can be the love “for one’s
child, or for one’s beloved friend. This means ‘unselfish’..this can also be phrased
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
as the more and more inclusive self” (Maslow, 1979: p. 262). The last type of
transcendence which is also stated by Maslow (1979:p. 264) is “the word
transcend also means ‘surpass’ in the sense simply of being able to do more than
one thought one could do, or more than one had in the past.”
Meanwhile, a study conducted by Levin and Steele (2005) mention
transcendent experience as ‘difficult to describe’. It is difficult to describe as it is
very personal. The ones who do not experience it may not understand. It has some
elements which make it be called transcendent experience. Levin and Steele
(2005) mention, “...the element of this experience is the perception of merging or
identification with the source of being-whether known as God, Higher self or the
Absolute or Eternal.” Further, they mention the key feature to transcendence:
A key feature to transcendence, as described by many experiencers, is
that it is ‘beyond perception and beyond human understanding.’ For
others, it is more immediate, more present, more real than other
experiences..in some crucial sense, higher than..the reality of everyday
experience. (Levin and Steele: 2005)
From the definition and explanation above, transcendental meaning in this
study is meaning which cannot be seen by our senses as it involves things which
make us become better human person such as self-actualization, tolerance and
equity. In relation with research, it is a certain moment in the middle of teaching
English in which they experience the beyond-human-understanding experience. It
is about what goes beyond teaching English to accounting departmet students
itself.
2. Self-actualization
The ultimate aim of lived experience is self-actualization. Self-actualization is
proposed by Maslow. Self-actualization happens before self-transcendence.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
According to Maslow as cited by Koltko-Rivera (2006), there are six steps of
needs. They can be seen in the figure below :
Figure 1. A rectified version of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (as cited by
Koltko-Rivera (2006: 303))
From the figure above, it can be seen that self-actualization seeks to gain
somebody’s potential. Self-actualization happens after people pass the
psychological needs, safety needs, belongingness and love needs, and esteem
needs. Heylighen (1992: 40) states that “the lowest level of needs may be called
physiological needs. These are needs of the body as a physiological system...they
consists of the need to breath, air, hunger, thirst, avoidance of extreme heat and
cold”. Hence, it relates to biological needs. After people can pass these needs,
Self-transcendence
(Seeks to further a cause beyond the self and to
experience a communion beyond the boundaries
of the self through peak experience)
Self-actualization
(Seeks fulfillment of personal potential)
Esteem needs
(Seeks esteem through recognition or
achievement)
Belongingness and love needs
(Seeks affiliations with a group)
Safety needs
(Seeks security through order and law)
Physiological (survival) needs
(Seeks to obtain the basic necessities of
life)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
they try to be get safety needs which is followed with belongingness and love
needs. Heylighen (1992: 41) states love and belonging are “the basic social or
affiliation motive, which dries people to seek contact with others and to build
satisfying relations with them”. Then, it is followed with esteem needs.
Furthermore Heyligen stated that people need recognition of their achievement
and success. Then, it is continued with self-actualization. Self-actualization
according to Heylighen is:
“The word derives from the idea that each individual has a lot of hidden
potentialities: talents or competences he or she could develop, but which
have as yet not come to the surface. Self-actualization signifies that these
potentialities of the self are made actual, are actualized in a continuing
process of unfolding” (1992: 41).
It means that self-actualization tries to make the potentials in each individual
appear continuously. Venter (2012: 65) also states that “Maslow’s concept of self-
actualization involved developing to one’s fullest potential”. Self-actualization
tries to dig out someone’s potential and develop it until the highest level.
People that have fulfilled self-actualization needs are hoped to improve
until self-transcendence needs which are the highest needs out of all needs. From
the table above, Koltko and Rivera (2006) states that self-transcendence goes
beyond the self and passes the boundaries as the experiences that people have.
Maslow as cited by Venter (2012) states the definition of self-transcendence.
“Maslow described self-transcendence as a person’s ability to obtain a
unitive consciousness with other humans (1964: 1968). The
transcended person is therefore able to view the world and his or her
purpose in the world in relation to other human beings on a more
global scale and is aware that they can have an impact, not just within
their own geographical boundaries or culture, but on the whole world”
(Venter,2012: 67).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
It means that the self-transcended people are able to go beyond themselves, search
their life values, and then go further the boundaries to give impact of their life to
the world. The self-actualized people that have got their fullest potentials can
reach the self-transcendence needs since they know their own potentials and
spread the values of life through their potentials across boundaries. At the end,
their life becomes really useful to the development of human being since the self-
transcended people have reached their highest needs and also help other people to
achieve their own self-transcendence needs. In short, I ensure to understand the
participants’ transcedent meaning (humanization) captured from their own lived
experience in teaching English. The meaning of teaching English from the
participants’ experience must be different and unique to one another and it goes
deeper than the experience itself.
3. Lived Experience
The word lived experience according to Bradley (2002), covers two
senses. The first sense refers to those key events in the past which have made man
what he is. This kind of experience accumulates over time, teaches us lessons and
so has effects by shaping or influencing our responses to the world. This is the
formative or diachronic (i.e. ‘through time’) sense of experience: “experience is
something set in the past that acts as a cause to mould our current behavior, which
is its effect”. The second sense of ‘experience’ is what is happening in the here
and now. Anything that counts as experience in the formative sense must first
have been processed in the present. Hence immediate experience is the primary
sense, so far as psychology is concerned. Anyone who is alive is always in the
midst of experiencing events.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
According to Murphy (1960, p. 13) as cited by Bradley (2002), lived
experience not only refers to sets of past events but also refers to what human
beings are constantly at work trying to make meaning of what is going on around
and ‘within’ them, a process that mixes memory including understanding,
awareness, desire, intention or expectation, anticipation, relations with others,
cultural patterns, feelings, belief or sights, behaviors, smells, sounds, etc. Each
person has a unique set of experiences which are treated as truth and which
determine the behavior of the individual. In this sense, Van Manen (1990) as cited
by Patton (2002) stated that truth (and associate behavior) is totally unique to each
individual. In line with this, personal lived experience refers to the lived
experience of an individual which is considered as unique from one individual to
another. The lived experience of one teacher participant is seen individually,
without being compared with the lived experience of the other teacher participant.
There are five aspects of lived experience according to Gardner as cited by
Weggins (1998: 83). The first one is understanding. understanding is defined as a
sufficient grasp of concepts, principles or skills so that one can bring them to bear
on new problems and situations, deciding in which ways one’s present
competencies can suffice and which ways one may require new skills or
knowledge To understand means to have knowledge of, or to be informed of a
certain object. Understanding helps one to judge possible responses that come to
mind and rejecting those that are inconsistent with some of the facts (Cronbach,
1963). An understanding helps teacher to decide any action and reaction that
she/he does because understanding is a mind representation of the teacher.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
The second aspect is belief. Belief is the most valuable psychological
construct to teacher’s education ( Pintrich, 1990). Teacher’s belief, which is part
of experience can inform educational practice in ways that prevailing study has
not and is essential to improve their professional preparation and teaching
practices (Pajaras, 1992). It takes teacher to determine certain attitude on her/his
teaching because she/he has certain belief about her/his students. In essence, belief
is concerned with values (Lonergan, 1958). Belief is expression of values and
feelings of people toward something. The difference between understanding and
belief is that understanding can change easily from time to time; whereas belief is
relatively static and difficult to change.
The third aspect is feeling. Feeling is a state which is in its entirety in
every moment of time as long as it endures (Pierce, 2004). When a person wants
to know someone’s feeling she/he usually uses feeling questions such as : “ How
do you feel about that?”. The question needs adjective responses expressing
feelings such as: anxious, happy, afraid, confident, and so on (Patton, 2002).
The fourth aspect is intention. Intention is a plan or goal. It is what people
intend to do or achieve. Intention is almost similar with expectation which means
a prediction or an estimate or subjective probability that a behavior will actually
be performed. Willis (2001) retained the Husserl’s idea of intentionality that
human thinking always linked to something as an end point to the act of thinking.
In line with this idea, certain detemined goal might be wished by teacher as part of
the teaching achievement.
The fifth aspect is action. According to Lonergan (1985), action which is
part of experience involves the use of five senses and bodily movements. Wilson
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
(2007) stated that it is something an agent does that was intentional under some
descriptions. Action is what someone can do with intention. Different situation
may insist teacher to take different action.
People usually use these kind of questions in the interview about lived
experience: What does this mean? What does this tell me about the nature
phenomenon of interest? (Patton, 2001). The question of “What does this mean?”
identifies intention and action. The teacher must have certain expectation towards
the students and for achieving that she has to take certain actions. Understanding
can be identified through the rise of knowldge/skills that the teacher applies when
solving certain problems. So the questions can begin with the identified problems
which the teacher processes in class then come to the reasons of her/his next
actions to solve the problems. Next, a long experience of teaching makes a teacher
have personal belief towards the students. The experience makes the teacher able
to judge some values towards the teaching and the students. This is how belief can
be identified. Finally, feeling can be identified by asking the emotional state
which appears on facing certain situations or realizing certain condition of her/his
teaching and or the students.
Lived experience is included in the phenomenology study. According to
Cresswell (2007: p. 57) “phenomenology study describes the meaning for several
individuals of their lived experiences of a concept or a phenomenon”. It describes
a phenomenon and includes description and interpretation of the phenomenon.
Van Manen (1990: p.1) states that the researchers” raise questions, gather data,
describe a phenomenon, and construct textual interpretations”. It relates to the
pedagogy. Pedagogy drives the essence of lived experience. Van Manen (1990:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
p.2) states that “pedagogy is the activity of teaching, parenting, educating, or
generally living with children that require constant practical acting in concrete
situations and relation”. Hence, the lived experience itself based on certain
phenomena in the real life situations.
Lived experience itself deals with the meaning of a phenomenon. It tries to
discover the deep meaning beyond the phenomenon that appears. Van Manen
(1990: p.11) states that “phenomenology is a human science (rather than natural
science) since the subject matter of phenomenological research is always the
structures of meaning of the lived human world”. Hence, phenomenology relates
to the human living in relation to the meaning of the lived experience. Wilhelm
Dilthey as cited by Van Manen (1990: p.3) states that Geisteswissenschaften as
the opposite of natural science is “the human world characterized by Geist-mind,
thoughts, consciousness, values, feelings, emotions, actions, and purposes, which
find their objectifications in languages, beliefs, arts, and institutions”. Human
sciences relates to people that have awareness or consciousness of their
experiences that have values, beliefs, actions. Further, Van Manen (1990: p.4)
states that human science focuses on explaining and understanding the meaning of
phenomenon. In order to be able to explain and understand the phenomenon,
people need to go deeper to the world of where someone experiences it. Van
Manen (1990: p.5) states that “since to know the world is profoundly to be in the
word in a certain way, the act of researching-questioning-theorizing is the
intentional act of attaching ourselves to the world, to become more fully part of
it”.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
According to Dilthey as cited by Van Manen (1990: 35), in its most basic
form lived experience involves our immediate, pre-reflective consciousness of
life: a reflexive or self-given awareness which is, as awareness, unaware of itself.
A lived experience does not confront me as something perceived or
represented; it not given to me, but the reality of lived experience is
there-for-me because I have a reflexive awareness of it, because I
process it immediately as belonging to me in some sense. Only in
thought does it become objective (p.223).
Lived experience, according to Van Manen (1990: 36), is the starting point and
end point of phenomenological research. The aim of phenomenology is to
transform lived experience into a textual expression of its essence-in such a way
that the effect of the text is at once a reflexive re-living and a reflective
appropriation of something meaningful: a notion by which a reader is powerfully
animated in his or her own lived experience. According to Alvesson and
Skoldberg (2000: 245), reflection means thinking about the conditions for what
one is doing, investigating the way in which the theoretical, cultural, and political
context of individual and intellectual involvement affects interaction with
whatever is being researched, often in ways difficult to become conscious of.
When we reflect, we try to ponder upon the premisses for our thoughts, our
observations and our use of language. Consequently, reflection is difficult.
According to Dilthey (1985) as cited by Van Manen (1990: p.36), lived
experience is the soul what breath is to the body: “Just as our body needs to
breathe, our soul requires the fulfillment and expansion of its existence in the
reverberation of emotional life” (p.59). Lived experience is the breathing of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
meaning. In the flow of life, consciousness breathes meaning in a to and from
movement: a constant heaving between the inner and the outer.
Van Manen (1990: p.38) said that human experience is only possible
because we have language. Language is so fundamentally part of our humanness
that, as quoted from Heidegger, language, thinking, and being are one. Lived
experience itself seems to have a linguistic structure. According Ricoeur as cited
by Van Manen (1990: p.39), experience and (un)consciousness are structured like
a language, and therefore one could speak of all experience, all human
interactions, as some kind of text.
Furthermore, Van Manen (1990: p.39) said that in one sense the notion of
textuality becomes a fruitful metaphoric device for analyzing meaning. If all
experience is like a text then we need to examine how these texts are socially
constructed. Interpretation that aims at explicating the various meanings
embedded in a text may then take the form of socially analyzing or deconstructing
the text and thus exploding its meanings.
To sum up, lived experience emphasizes the meaning of somebody’s lived
experience. The experience and its reflection enable us to come to an
understanding of the deeper meaning or significance of an aspect of human
experience. Through lived experience, we, therefore, are able to become more
fully aware who we are.
4. Awareness
Awareness is a person’s consciousness of the things that he/ she is doing.
Lier (2013: p 11) said that to learn something new one must first notice it. This
noticing is an awareness of its existence, obtained and enhanced by paying
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
attention to perceptual powers in the rigt direction, making mental ‘energy’
available for processing. Processing involves linking something that is perceived
in the outside world to structures (pattern of connections). Language awareness,
whether deliberate or spontaneous is thus a crucial aspect of language learning,
both firs and subsequent. In addition, educational settings require awareness of
learning strategies and processes, social awareness of classroom structures,
awareness of learning and teaching styles and so on.
According to Association for Language Awareness as quoted in Ellis
(2012), a key definition to understand the meaning of laguage awareness is
“...conscious perception and sensitivity in language learning, language teaching,
and language use. In this study, it is the awareness of teaching English. It refers to
teachers’ conscioness about the importance of teaching English in relation with
teaching English to accounting students and with their life. Being aware is also the
notion of being able to notice what a person experiencing right now in relation
with the idea that finally teaching English to accounting students is very
challenging and meaningful to their life. Meaning, which can be both empirical
and transcendent, is able to be shaped if the person involved is aware of their life
events,
5. Teaching English
Education according to Finney (2002: p.73) has a purpose to enable the
individual to progree towards self-fulfillment. It is concerned with the
development of understanding, not just a passive perception of knowledge or the
acquisiotion of specific skills. The goals of education are not defined in terms of
particular ends or products, but in terms of processes and procedures by which the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
individual develops understanding and awareness and creates possibilities for
future learning. This statement strengthen by Delphit (2003: p.20) which stated
that the goal of education must be to assist individuals in their quest for divinity or
perfection, by fostering a deep understanding and guide practice of the principles
of “correct living”.
To be active in the learning process, a learner must have motivation as the
affective aspect which can influence the affective variables such as anxiety, level
of comfort and risk-taking. It implies that teachers have to be able to motivate,
encourage, understand, and provide a positive school experience. Anyway, we
have to realize that a teacher is a unique individual who has her/his own way and
technique in teaching. The thing underlies the decision taken in the class is
teacher’s thinking. Richards and Renandya (2002: p.385) highlight that what
teachers think and do at the classroom level determines what the learners learn in
the classrom. therefore, besides being able to raise students’ motivation, teachers
have to be able to think and do appropriately so that the learners can learn well.
Teachers must be reflective, analytic, creative, and open to new methods and ideas
(Finney, 2002: p.77). This is one of the requirements of a professional teacher.
Practically in classroom, teaching and learning, a teacher has to make many
decisions that influence her/his behavior within a single period. Scrivener (1994:
p.1v) stated that a teacher has a number of decisions option; she/he can decide to
do something or to do something else, or not to do anything at all. such decision
makings are metacognitive in nature, affected by classroom context and the
techers’ beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowledge acquisition or
learning. The teacher’s belief defines the teacher’s conception of teaching and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
learning. Chan (2004: p.334) stated that there are various kinds of teachers’ belief
which are related to their conceptions about teaching and learning for example
beliefs about values, beliefs about teacher efficacy and beliefs about the nature of
knowledge and knowledge acquisition (epistemological beliefs).
In doing so, besides the belief of the teacher and the learner, the process of
language teaching and learning in the classroom must be based on the principles
as the theory derived from research, to which teachers need to match classroom
practices. The principles are about the things in the area of cognitive like
automaticity and meaningful learning, affective principles like self-confidence and
risk taking, and linguistic principles like native language effect, interlanguage,
and communicative competence. To create such atmosphere, a teacher is
demanded to be able to perform her/his ability including preparing the materials
and the lesson plan, presenting the materials, the strategies and classroom
management.
a. Teaching English as a World Language
Harmer (2007) said that English was already well on its way to becoming
a genuine ‘lingua franca’, that is a language used widely for communication
between people who do not share the same first (or even second) language, than
as a native language the majority of competent English speakers are not native
speakers but second-language users. As a result, a concensus has emerged that
istead of inner, outer and expanding circle Englishes, we need to recognize
‘World Englishes’ (Jenkins, 2006a: p.159) or ‘Global English’ (Graddol, 2006:
p.106). World English belongs to everyone who speaks it. Thus, nobody
monopolizes English anymore, in other words ‘native’ and ‘non-native’ speakers
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
own it together in a kind of international shareholders’ democracy since whatever
English we speak, Indian English, British English or Malaysian English, we have,
or should have, equal rights as English users (Rajagopalan, 2004: p.113).
For English in Indonesia, Herrini (2007: p.40) mentions that English is the
officially designated primary foreign language of Indonesia and is widely taught
throughout the country. It is mentioned furthermore that a working knowledge of
English is required for university-level study in many disciplines, for Indonesian
goverment employees in certain offices and programs, and for employees in
commerce, banking, and tourism industries.
To summarize, since English has become the lingua Franca through
globalization where English is now the dominant or official language in over sixty
countries, Indonesia as a part of expanding circle countries adjusting to the world
trend of keeping pace with technology, economic and social advances. The goals
of English as subject/language course are for academic or occupational use and
for communicative resource. Then, in English teaching, it is aimed to the
acquisition to apply the language itself.
b. The English Teaching in the Accounting Department
Accountants today need to be equipped by English language in order to be
able to communicate well with foreign clients or to ease them in working with
English terms in business activities and reports. The teaching of English in the
Accounting department as one of government policies is to develop the qualified
higher education system in accounting generally and to have professional
accounting graduates who fulfill the global standard as it is stated in Academic
Guidance Book of Accounting Department (2014: p.8).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
Besides following the national standard, Sanata Dharma University, in this
case the Accounting department as the place of the research, also follow
International Education Standards (IES) issued by International Federation of
Accountants (IFAC). In International Education Standard no. 2 there are some
main knowledge which have to be mastered by accounting undergraduate
students: (1). Accounting, Finance and Related knowledge; (2). The
organizational and business knowledge; (3). Information and Technology
knowledge. Besides these main knowledge, according to International Education
Standard no. 3, professional accountant have to have some skills: personal skills,
Interpersonal and communication skills, and organizational and business
management skills. Here English is included in interpersonal and communication
skills.
Because English is so important, the Accounting Department of Sanata
Dharma University has English programs in order to prepare the students with the
skills and competence to communicate effectively using correct and appropriate
English in business communication. There are three English courses for the
students of the first year: Bahasa Inggris I, II, and III. These courses are included
in Communal Life Courses because learning English is not merely about learning
the language but also the culture and the values/beliefs of people whose language
is originated. However in 2015 there is a chance in the curriculum of English. The
English course in accounting department compact to be only one English class
namely Bahasa Inggris with 3 credits and taught for 3 hours. The English subject
also standardized by a team from the language institution of Sanata Dharma.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
In the end of the program the students are expected to be able to
understand the English knowledge and use the language well in business
communication and organization where they will work later on.
6. Accounting Students
Accounting is one of economics sciences. According to
InternationalStudents.com as retrieved from
http://www.internationalstudent.com/study-accounting/what-is-accounting/.
Accounting is a science that is used to analyze and manipulate financial data for
businesses and the public. Accounting is arguably the most vital aspect of any
business or company. The accountant makes sure that the finances of a company
are correct, and balances the company’s books. Accountants can find stolen
money or money that has gone missing within the company; they can advise on
business funds for potential growth; most importantly, they have a firsthand look
into the future of a company.
Accounting is often considered to be one of the most intense college
majors. Students are required to take very rigorous courses in a number of
different subjects. In addition, the core coursework required in accounting can be
daunting and takes much studying and preparation. Students are required to take
courses in Mathematics, Economics, Business, and courses in accounting.
Business classes usually begin with introductory accounting courses like
financial and managerial accounting. Most universities also require some courses
in business law. When studying accounting the students have to take introductory
courses in several different business disciplines such as: business administration,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
finance, and marketing. Other business classes may include leadership or
organizational behavior classes or Business Policy.
Most importantly in the curriculum are the core courses. These core
courses are the backbone of the accounting program and are meant to provide
students with the skills necessary to find employment after graduation. The
students are expected to take courses in advanced financial accounting, advanced
managerial accounting, Federal Income Taxation, Tax Code, and Auditing.
Students can also choose between different concentrations such as international
accounting or business systems. Some universities also offer course in specific
subjects such as financial statement analysis, forensic accounting, and accounting
research.
This research tried to find out how the teaching of English in Accounting
department, Sanata Dharma university helps the students to improve their
communication skills in business using English. The Accounting Department of
Sanata Dharma University has English programs in order to prepare the students
with the skills and competence to communicate effectively using correct and
appropriate English in business communication. There are three English courses
for the students of the first and second year: Bahasa Inggris I, II, and III. These
courses are included in Communal Life Courses because learning English is not
merely about learning the language but also the culture and the values/beliefs of
people whose language is originated.
B. RELATED RESEARCH REPORTS
This study specifically focuses on the lived experience of English teachers
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
regarding their teaching experience in teaching accounting department students.
This study focuses on uncovering teachers’ meaning construction on their lived
experiences in relation how to teach accounting department students. One of the
researchers who have done the research on lived experience is Jane Agee. In her
research she emphasized the important of listen to teachers ‘voice. Teachers’
voice in her research is seen as the voice of the marginalized people. She said that
the kind and amount of talk that occurs in a relationship can tell us much about the
positioning of two people (1996: p.4). Furthermore she said that the dialogue in
an effective relationship is characterized by listening. According to Burbules as
cited by Agee (1996), what matters most in dialogue between a person in a
position of authority and another is hearing that other voice:
Listening is an important aspect of legitimate authority, not only as a
way in which one stands to learn something new, but as a concrete
relational activity that alters the status of one’s authority. Listening
exhibit respect, interest, and concern for one’s partner. It is a specific
way of enabling another’s voice to be heard. (p.33)
Agee said that attention to constructions of self and other offers a lens for seeing
the subtle ways in which these constructions shape our lives and our relationships
(1996: 4).
Kirk (2004) also did the research on lived experience. In her article, she
discussed data from a study of women teachers in Karachi, Pakistan, that present
their alternative perspectives so as to inform educational policy development and
to develop more explicitly gendered theories of teaching. She began with a brief
introduction to the positioning of women teachers within the international context
of gender, education, and development. She then introduced the study from which
she presented data and the organizing concept of impossible fictions. Using the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
words of women teachers, she discussed experiences of becoming and being a
woman teacher, as well as women’s experiences and perspectives on teaching
girls and boys.
Relevant research on English for Specific purposes especially English for
business focuses on the development of communicative competence for business
settings (Boyd, 1991: p. 2). Another researcher, Nguyen Thi Chau Ngan (2011)
said that the overwhelming weight of emphasis in language analysis in the
teaching of English for Accounting (ESP) has been a concern for teachers of
English at the College of Finance and Customs (CFC). In the ESP course, the
teaching materials teach students to recognize the surface form by means of the
specialist texts. The difficulties the students and teachers encounter are the
unfamiliarity with the specialist contents and far too complex sentence structures.
Ngan produced a syllabus which gave high priority to the language form and
content via simplified language and authentic materials. Ngan incorporated the
Content-Based Instruction (CBI) approach in the ESP context, and then the ESP
material designed in the CBI approach was used in the treatment group in one
semester. Ngan administered a survey including the post test and the questionnaire
when the course finished. The findings from this research reveal the students’
interest, and involvement in the course. Also, they highlight the students’ ability
to get better scores in all modes of ESP.
For Indonesia’s circumstances, Suyadi (2016) has done a research on
English for Specific Purposes for accounting students. He said that as a foreign
language in Indonesia, English has its own complexity to be taught and learned. A
specific method of teaching and learning English is needed in order to make it
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
more useful for the learners and not wasting time of teaching it to the students. To
make it more useful, the teachers of English need to consider the basic needs of
the students in learning English in their classroom. Specific English materials
should be used for a specific study program. In other words, every study program
should have its own specification of English materials. Accounting Program is a
study program which needs its own specification of material for English subject in
order to match it with the students’ target knowledge of accountancy. From his
research he found that the students of accounting program needs a specific
material in learning English which has tight relationship with their study program.
Furthermore, the students of English Language Study have done research
using interviews and observations on teachers’ lived experience in teaching
English to special needs children as did by Christiana Sidupa (2010) and to
hearing-impaired students as did by Antonius Setyawan (2013) which resulted in
the teachers’ self actualization. But this study explores teachers’ lived experiences
in teaching English to accounting department students which is different with the
previous research. This research will find out how the teachers look at themselves,
their determination, their positioning as human beings and their voice as
subordinates or marginalized.
C. FRAMEWORK OF PRE-UNDERSTANDING
Teachers have a key role in the successful acquisition of language of their
students. As language teachers, they are in charge of designing and implementing
a variety of learning activities that meet the students’ need and interest which are
appropriate to their developmental levels. Teachers’ professional attitude and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
knowledge are required. The teachers should be able to show enthusiasm and have
reasonably high expectations of what students can achieve. Teaching English to
the accounting students department needs professional system including the
material and its preparation, the teachers, and the teaching method itself.
The meaning of teaching English to Accounting students which is the
focus of this research cannot be separated from the prior learning experiences,
beliefs, awareness, intention that they have within them. Van Manen (1990: 90)
said that phenomenological themes are not objects or generalizations;
methaphorically speaking they are more like knots in the webs of our experiences,
around which certain lived experiences are spun and thus lived as meaningful
wholes. In other words, it can be defined as some points around which the
participants’ lived experience occur. The points form a whole lived experience in
the participants’ life. The themes are the knots of meaning which are related one
another. Furthermore Van Manen (1990: 88) said that theme is the mean to get at
the notion. The notion is what the whole meaning is about and the themes help us
to see into it.
The language teaching skill and knowledge help to comprehend the
teaching method and the strategy by the teacher in the classroom. It means that the
teacher is expected to be able to know and apply how to manage the time and the
classroom, how to transfer the knowledge, techniques, the instruments and media
used in the classroom, and how to evaluate the students’ progress. The knowledge
of teaching English and the skill to teach will be very useful in defining the things
to be delivered to the students or the materials. The teaching of English for
accounting students must be in coherence with the purpose itself. The purpose in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
specific way, in this case teaching English to Accounting students, is going to be
fulfilled by examining the real needs of the students, especially the need of
English for business communication. Therefore, need analysis becomes the
starting point of designing the materials. The teachers may be involved in
analyzing the needs so they know exactly what they have to deliver in the class.
In the teaching, the teachers are demanded to teach in line with the goals
defined by the department. So, it is very important for the teacher to understand
the goal of the English teaching and the goal of the department stated in the
syllabus. Furthermore, being an English teacher in accounting department, she/he
must be active and has high motivation especially to seek recent information
related to accounting from various sources.
Teaching English for accounting students also need specific observation
toward the students since they will be the clients along the course who need to be
‘well treated’ so the teachers will not miss the strategy. In this case, the teaching
of English to Accounting department students must be carefully designed because
the students of Accounting department learn specific English different from the
English they have learned in senior high school. The teachers need to teach in
such a way using certain approach or method and facilitate the students to practice
more than feeding the theory so they will well equipped. The teaching itself must
not be so strict and boring like in school but more on giving the students chance to
experience the English usage than being busy with grammar rules even though
somehow it is still needed. The teachers need to be creative in delivering and
making the teaching materials so that the students will be interested and motivated
in learning English. If the students are motivated and enthusiast in learning
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
English and show a good result, it means that the teachers achieved teaching
success and therefore they can fulfill their self-actualization.
The situations that teachers face is various. There are times when they
teach without any significance problems but there are also times when they have
to think about solutions to their problems. There are times when their students feel
lazy to study and there are times they feel very eager to learn. There are smart
students who can participate in the class actively but also there are students who
are slow and passive. In relation with those things, teachers decision to deal with
weak students is important.
Considering the importance of factors above in teaching English to the
accounting department students, the meaning which are formed are related to both
the efficiency and effectiveness in teaching. The teachers have their own
perceived meanings which evolve around their awareness, belief, their life history,
teaching strategy, and teaching action. Teaching English in a specific purpose
would give results on more enjoyment, more useful and more applicable English
related to accounting. Those are bracketed under pre-figured themes namely:
teaching English for specific purposes fulfilled the students’ needs, teaching
English in fun and creative ways make effective and efficient learning process,
teaching English to the accounting department students make the teachers
improve their teaching skills and to be more autonomous.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter discusses the methodology and the procedures that were
employed in the research. It is important to the study because it elaborates the
appropriate steps of how to answer the research questions systematically. The
elaborations covers eight primary sections, namely (1) research method, (2)
research design, (3) nature and sources of text, (4) instruments, (5) text gathering,
(6) text processing/text analysis, (7) research procedures, and (8) trustworthiness
A. RESEACH METHOD
In order to explore the meaning of teachers’ lived experience of teaching
English to accounting department students, the research question formulated is
“What is the meaning of teaching English in the accounting department to the
teachers?” As the consequent, the research key goal is to describe the teachers’
lived experience in teaching English to accounting department students and then
interpret it.
In this research, a qualitative approach was used to reveal the teachers’
lived experience. Qualitative approach is used since the study is related to the
social phenomenon. It focuses on a teachers’ lived experience on teaching English
to Accounting students. This made this study belong to a narrative study. In
describing the narrative, this study tries to seek the meaning from the teacher’s
lived experience to accounting students. The process of describing meaning
makes this narrative study also belong to phenomenological study.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
This research is the phenomenological and hermeneutical study. It is
phenomenology because it is the descriptive study of lived experience
(phenomena) in the attempt to enrich lived experience by mining its meaning. It is
also hermeneutic because it is the interpretive study of the expressions and texts
of lived experience (Van Manen, 1990:38). Here, the studied phenomenon, the
English teaching to accounting department students, is explored through whatever
information from the in-depth interviews and document checks. This information
is used to find out the teachers’ lived experience of teaching accounting
department students by knowing how they perceive, describe, feel about, judge,
remember, make sense of, and talk about it. Using sources of text data, I then can
triangulate the data, so that valid data can be obtained and trustworthiness of the
result of the study can be increased.
The data were obtained from in-depth interviews and document checking.
The interviews were held with two participants. This interaction aims to make the
researcher be objective. The objectivity is crucial to help the researcher be able to
make right argumentation and judgment in this study as the scientific study.
Through document checks, intuition, ideas, and thought can be explored and
compared. It is in line with Kerlinger’s argument that’ personal and societal
products can be sources of research data. Such verbal materials, produced by
individuals and groups can provide measures of variables” (1983: 468).
This study is a phenomenological study so the researcher must provide
some explanations related to the story found, heard and witnessed in this study.
The participants of this study shared their meaningful experiences related to the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
issue. To understand the meaning of the shared experience, the researcher
described the shared experience of the participants to get its essence.
This thesis is a product of experiential and academic research. Therefore,
the issues of validity and reliability are considered important. Cohen, Manion,
Marisson (2000:105) state that validity refers to the measurements of what it
purposes to measure. Validity is a crucial key in order to make the research
effective. If a research is not valid, then the research is considered worthless.
Creswell (2007: 195) states that validity refers to the conclusion which has been
made must come from the credible, defensible, warranted data. These data can
refuse to accept other alternative explanations so that the researcher, participants
and readers have the same point of view. Meanwhile, reliability is defined as the
fit between the researcher’s record as data and what actually occurs in the reality.
These issues take role as the guarantee of the trustworthiness of this thesis.
Trustworthiness is very important in a research because the readers of this thesis
should have a proper understanding related to the statements made by the
participants, analysis and the conclusion.
B. RESEARCH DESIGN
As stated in the earlier chapter, this research attempts to answer research
question that is “What is the meaning of teaching English in the Accounting
department to the teachers?” The problem of the study suggests that this research
is a qualitative study with a specific focus on the stories told by individuals or
narrative. As cited by Creswell (2007: 54) from Pinnegar and Daynes (2006),
narrative can be both a method and the phenomenon of study. As a method, it
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
begins with the experiences as expressed in lived and told stories of individuals.
After that, analyzing and understanding the stories lived and told are covered.
Narrative is understood, therefore, as a spoken or written text giving an account of
an event or action or series of events or actions, chronologically connected (cited
from Czarniawska, 2004: 17).
In order to answer the research question, I as the researcher would like to
conduct my study in Accounting Department of Sanata Dharma University,
Yogyakarta. In this department, English is an obligatory subject in the first
semester. In the first semester, the teachers teach general English.
In the process, I started with determining the sources of text. I went to the
department and asked the dean about the teachers who are involved with English
class. The time for the research was implemented in the middle of February to
April 2016, particularly in the academic year of 2015/2016. Before the interview,
the researcher constructed a set of interview guides. Here, the interviews will be
audio-taped and transcribed to capture the voices of the participants into written
text. After selecting and giving the coding to the text, I described and interpreted
the text to obtain meaning. Throughout the analysis, their voices were transferred
into the body of work to demonstrate participants’ involvement through direct
quotes and retelling of stories.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
Figure 2. Research Design
1. Nature and Sources of the Texts
The nature of text in this study is narrative texts. The texts are resulted
from in-depth interviews with the participants of the research who are the English
teachers teach English in accounting department, Sanata Dharma University.
Based on the texts which were obtained from the participants, the researcher
sought the description and the interpretation of the meaning. The setting of this
research is in Accounting Department, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta.
RESEARCH
IDENTITY
Title : The Meaning of
Teaching English to
Accounting
Department
Students
Setting: Accounting
Department of Sanata
Dharma University,
Yogyakarta
Time : Mid February to
April 2016
Academic year : 2015/2016
II. Process
1. Determining sources of text
2. Collecting significant information
3. Arranging interview guides
5. Conducting the interview
6. Transcribing the interview results
7. Selecting and coding the text
6. Describing the text
7. interpreting the text
III. Sources
1. Text sources: two English teachers of
accounting department
2. Nature of text: narrative
I. Goal
To describe and interpret teachers' lived
experience in teaching English to
Accounting students
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
2. Instruments
This research used two kinds of instruments namely document checks and
in-depth interviews. Through document checks, intuition, ideas, and thought can
be explored and compared. It is in line with Kerlinger’s argument that’ personal
and societal products can be sources of research data. Such verbal materials,
produced by individuals and groups can provide measures of variables” (1983:
468). The researcher checked the participants’ statement of purpose, assessment
forms and academic records because the researcher believe that these documents
would add the richness of the early data obtained from the main instrument.
The purposes of interview in the phenomenological-hermeneutics research
are to explore and gather experiential narrative material and to develop meaning
of an experience (Van Mannen, 1990: 66). For the interviews, they were done
twice for each participant. There are two participants. Hence, the interviews were
done four times. The interviews were snowballing interviews, which questions of
the interviews were developed naturally following the directions of the interview.
The questions were not totally set but they came up as the results of interviewee’s
previous answers. Interview is the other data gathering of lived experience.
Creswell (2012:217) states that “a qualitative interview occurs when researchers
ask one or more participants general, open-ended questions and record their
answers”. Interview is divided into one-on-one interviews and focus group
interviews. This research used one-on-one interviews. Creswell (2012: 218) states
that “ one-on-one interviews are ideal for interviewing participants who are not
hesitant to speak, who are articulate, and who can share ideas comfortably.“ The
interview is started from the personal experience (Van Mannen, 1990:54). The
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
interview result is in the form unstructured data. Creswell (2012:214) states that
“unstructured text data obtained from transcribing audiotapes of interviews.”
3. Text Gathering
The text gathering is divided into two parts based on the text gathering
instruments. They are text gathering techniques on document checks and and in-
depth interview. For document checks, teachers’ lesson plans, and syllabus were
used. For the interview, the researcher will do bracketing. Text gathering on in-
depth interview will be done twice in each participant. There are two participants
so the interview will be done four times. The in-depth interviews lead to empathy.
According to Wiggins empathy is the ability to get inside another person’s
feelings and worldview in order to experience the world as another person’s
feelings it (1998 : 85). Furthermore he said that empathy can lead us not only to
rethink but to experience a change of heart as we come to understand.
Figure 3. The steps of text gathering (based on Cresswell and Van Manen)
audio recorded data
transcript of in-depth
interview data
audio recorded data
transcript of interview data
2. Conducting In-depth interview
3. Transcribing the interview result
5. Conducting re-interview
6. Transcribing the interview data
4. Document checks
photocopied or scanned
documents
questions guidelines
1. Constructing questions as in-depth
interview guidelines
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
The text gathering is set up in the following steps: The first is constructing in-
depth interview question guidelines. In order to reveal the meaning, the questions
must be formulated well so that it can dig out the meaning. Van Manen (1990: 43)
said that “ the essence of the question said Gadamer (1975), is the opening up, and
keeping open, of possibilities...to truly question something is to interrogate
something from the heart of our existence, from the center of our being”. It means
that the question should reveal the experience until the depth awareness of the
experience.
The second step is the in-depth interview. The researcher records the in-
depth interview. The third step is transcribed the interview results. The researcher
makes the data transcript. According to Creswell, transcription is the process of
converting audiotape recordings or fieldnotes into text data (2012: 239). The
fourth step is document checks. The purpose of document checks is to check
compliance with expresssed statements. The documents are coded and compared
to the other data sources.The fifth step is the researcher conducting re-interview.
The researcher records the re-interview. The re-interview were used to complete
necessary data which had not been covered in the in-depth interview done
previously.The sixth step is the researcher transcribe the re-interview data.The
data obtained was used to conduct triangulation in order to improve the validation
of this study.
4. Text Analysis
The phenomenological research focuses on interpreting the phenomenon
naturally. Therefore, this research has a foundation to interpret the materials as
natural as it is. The process is managed by determining the specific theme to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
gather the material in the particular scope. The determination theme drives the
research to focus more on the essence, as it is also natural. Furthermore, in the
construction process, the researcher paid attention to every part which has strong
and significant points in developing the description.
In collecting anecdotes, one has to recognize what parts of the
text of daily living are significant for one’s study. While it is
happening, it is important to try to recover those living phrases
and incidents that give the anecdote a cogent power or point.
Therefore, it may be necessary to go back to retrieve the relevant
“trivia” that help to construct the anecdote. In gathering
anecdotes, one needs to be quite rigorous and construct accounts
that are trimmed of all extraneous, possibly interesting but
irrelevant aspects of theories. (Van Mannen, 1990. p. 69).
Meanwhile, Moustakas states that text analysis can be done through describing the
personal experiences with a phenomenon, making a list of significant elements,
and then grouping them into larger units called meaning units, making “meaning
units”, determining “what” and “how”, and then incorporating textual and
structure description (Moustakas, 1994, as in Cresswell, 2007). In analyzing the
data, the significant elements that illustrate the understanding about how the
participant experienced the phenomenon need to be highlighted, which is called
horizonalization (Moustakas, 1994). The cluster of meaning can be developed
from the statements. From these descriptions, a composite description which
provides the essential aspect (the essence of a phenomenon) can be developed.
Then the text can be reduced into meaningful segments and given names for the
segments (coding the data).
In analyzing the text, the researcher used the steps adopted from Cresswell
(2012, p. 261-262) which are also in line with Van Mannen and Moustakas. Those
steps are:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
46
Figure 4. The Steps of Text Analysis (adapted from Van Mannen and Creswell)
After conducting the in-depth interviews, transcribed the data, and doing
document checks, the researcher analyzed the data and conducted re-interview to
gather the missing information. After transcribing the overall data and re-read the
transcript, the reseacher selected the text and made classification using table to
construct and coded the text (step 1). Coding was used to build the themes (step
2). Each theme has its own coding. In coding some numbers were given in order
to enable the readers to search the anecdotes easily in the interview transcript.
themes
interpretation of each participant
coding in each transcript of interview data
shared experience from each participant
description of each participant
shared experience from each participant
transcript of member
final writing of description and
interpretation of lived experience
5. Writing interpretation of each
participant
1. Coding the transcript in
transcript of interview data
2. Decide themes
3. Writing description of each
participant
8. Final writing
6. Writing interpretation among
participants (shared experience)
7. Member checking
4. Writing description among
participants (shared experience)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
47
Berg (1989) in Miles and Huberman (1994: p.9) state that coding is giving tags or
labels for assigning units of meaning to descriptive information compiled during
the study. In line with this definition, coding was done in this study in order to
find out the key content of the in-dept interviews. For example, the readers found
a code like this: 1-W03-1-ET-T-SA. 1 represents Appendix 1. W03 represents
conversation number 3 with Ms Widi. 1 represent in-depth interview 1 with Ms.
Widi. ET represents Emergent Themes. T represents Transcendent themes. SA
represents Self-actualization. It means that the readers can trace the code in
appendix 1 and directly go to conversation 3 which is the first in-depth interview
of Ms. Widi and the theme is emergent themes which is transcendent theme and
that is self-actualization. Abbreviation of all codes can be seen in the list of
abbreviation.
The third step is writing description of each participant. The researcher writes
description of each participant based on five fields in lived experience:
understanding, belief, intention, action, and feeling. They were used to prove the
empirical and transcendent themes. The fourth step is the researcher writes the
description of the two participants. The researcher writes shared experience. In
gathering the data, each experience is appreciated. The fifth step, the researcher
writes interpretations of each participant based on understanding, belief, intention,
action, and feeling. The six step is the researcher writes the interpretation of the
two participants. The researcher writes the shared experience. The text needs to be
rich in order to discover the phenomenon. The text needs to be deep. According to
Van Manen (1990: p.152) “depth is what gives the phenomenon or lived
experience to which we orient ourselves its meaning and its resistance to our
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
48
fuller understanding”. The seventh step is member checking. The researcher did
member checking to the participants related to the result of description and
interpretation. The last step is final writing of description and interpretation. At
this step, the researcher drew conclusion. The researcher needed to review the
analyzed data and assess the implication for the research question.
C. TRUSTWORTHINESS
The research was based on a triangulation process that was done with in-
depth interviews. The consistency of the text as well as its validity and reliability
became a high concern in this research. Considering the purpose of
transferability, the researcher really considered about the participants’ quality. The
relevancy of participants’ capacity in providing rich, thick, and suitable
descriptions to contextualize the study is considered well. The aspect of
conformability also became a high consideration. Since it refers to the description
of one’s lived experiences consisting of meaningful themes, the conformability
aspect is a way to improve validity and reliability and reduce bias. Giving a
tentative interpretation back to the participant is one of the conformability aspects
considered in this study.
In order to establish credibility, the researcher used a member checking
technique because it showed credibility in the findings and interpretations. The
process of providing good quality tape for recording and transcribing the record
were applied in this research. In relation with the validation, the participants were
invited to review the transcripts of their interviews as well as the interpreted data.
The researcher was also careful to manage bias and expectations as reflectively or
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
49
awareness. To manage this threat, the researcher used bracketing. In analyzing the
data, the researcher created a domain list consisting of meaningful themes. It was
used to provide an overall structure for understanding and describing each
individual participant’s experiences.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50
CHAPTER IV
DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION
The focus of this chapter is to present more detail the presentation of the
findings arising from the exploration of the phenomenon and reveals the lived
experiences of teachers in teaching English to Accounting depatment students.
The description itself will contain interpretation. After that, essential themes will
be able to be obtained. This chapter is divided into two parts namely (1) the
teachers’ lived experience description, and (2) the interpretation of the teachers’
lived experience description.
A. DESCRIPTION
There were two participants who were being interviewed in this research.
They were Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera. Both are pseudo names. They are teaching
English at the same accounting department. Below are the descriptions of their
lived experiences of teaching English to the accounting department students.
1. Starting the Class
a. Preparing and Designing the Materials
In August 2015 Ms. Widi was assigned to teach English to accounting
department students. It was her second time to teach the students of accounting
department, Sanata Dharma University. She was amazed because it was a quite
big class. She had to teach about 45 to 50 students at that time. She thought it was
pretty hard to manage a big class. Therefore, before she started teaching the
students, she had prepared and designed the materials which she thought could
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
51
fulfil the students need. She believed as a teacher or lecturer, she had to do need
analysis to know her students. She thought she also needed to modify the
materials because at that time it was a kind of team teaching so there was already
a syllabus from the university. However as a lecturer, as a teacher she modified
the syllabus here and there, and the change she made was depended on her need
analysis towards her students:
“Anyway as a lecturer as a teacher we..I myself did that. I
modified here and there..and again it depends on the ..on my need
analysis” (1-W04-1-ET-E-AU).
She was aware that she also needed to know her class, her students from
the very first meeting. So in the very first meeting, she really observed at that time
what had been going on with her class, what had been going on with her students,
what had been going on with the interaction, the communication, and also because
it was more on speaking so as a teacher she easily found out probably a kind of
different or different in ability:
“I needed to know my class, my students from the very first
meeting. So in the very first meeting, I really observed at that
time what’s going on with my class, what’s going on with my
students, what’s going on with the interaction, the
communication, and also I..because it’s more on speaking yaa as a
teacher we easily found out probably a kind of different or
different in ability” ( 1-W04-1-ET-T-AW).
But she said that most of the students in that class were great. They spoke
English really well because like 80% of them got an A or B. It was not because
she was too easy to give the mark but because they were able to show the best
performance. They were really eager to learn, to study English and moreover,
they brought with them the highest spirit to the class eventhough it was 3 credits
class. It made Ms. Widi feeling proud of her students:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
52
“But most I would say that the students in that class were mostly
great. They speak English really well. Because like 80% of them
got an A or B. Yes..not because I was too easy to give the
mark..no..but because they’re able to show the best performance
in a..they really eager to learn to study and moreover ..they
brought with them the highest spirit to the class so because it
was 3 credits. Can you imagine 3 credits” (1-W04-1-ET-T-FPS).
Furthermore about preparing the materials she said that she actually got
the textbook from the university. But again the textbook needed modification here
and there and additional information, additional materials.
“Okay. We got the textbook actually. But again the textbook was
you know like quite yaa.. it needed modification here and there
and additional information...additional materials” (1-W05-1-ET-
T-DIS).
But overall she still stuck to the syllabus and also the textbook but she
tried to be autonomous and creative by modifying or adding the materials by
having more activities. She and her three assistants divided the activity into two,
the very first one was the introduction part where they usually had ice breaking.
It was really mainstream teaching method which teachers always do. The second
one they did like more funny, interesting activities. It was like reading but reading
in a very interesting way.
“In a..but overall we still stick to the syllabus and also the
textbook but we modified or added by having more activities. So
we divided in two, say for example the very first one is the
introduction, usually we had ice breaking. ya...ya.. come on that’s
really mainstream . That’s teacher always do right. and The
second one we did like I think more funny, interesting activities.
It’s like reading but reading in very interesting way” (1-W05-1-
ET-E-AU).
But in order to make the activities worked well, Ms. Widi and her assistant
struggled for making her students understood some vocabularies. Then after that
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
53
they asked the students to read a text and discussed it with their friend. They had
a group work.
“So we developed their understanding first on certain
vocabularies. Then after that we asked them to read but yaa..after
that they discussed it with a friend for example. So we had like a
group work” (1-W05-1-ET-T-ST).
Meanwhile Ms Vera, another English teacher at the accounting
department, Sanata Dharma university was also assigned to teach English to
accounting deparment students of Sanata Dhama University, Yogyakarta. But she
taught the students in August 2014. She taught two classes of first semester
students. They were also big classes, the first class consisted of 55 students and
another class consisted of 49 students. As a teacher she also had to prepare and
design the materials for her classes. But for her, material was not the same with
handout.
At that time, she got a chance to design her own syllabus for Bahasa
Inggris 1, 2, and 3. She planned the syllabus with Mr. Supar (the Head of
Accounting department, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta). He agreed with
her syllabus. For Bahasa Inggris 1 the material was General English but the focus
was on ESP but the main focus was job hunting and company profile-Talking
about company. and for Bahasa Inggris 3 the material was about TOEFL. For
Bahasa Inggris 1, it was General English where skills such as speaking, reading,
and writing skills were taught. But eventhough the sentences were general , the
focus was on accounting meaning to say English for business.
Actually in the old curriculum there was a discussion about jobs but it was
too general. There was Describing job-General English. But it also was too
general. Therefore she made it more focused. There were introduction, describing
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
job, daily routines which focused on business. In her mind, for the Introduction
she assumed that the students were a manager of a company, or a marketing
manager. she also assumed that the students were a bank teller, et cetera, so in the
introduction she asked the students to introduce themselves. Later on when they
talked about daily routines, they talked about an appariser’ daily routines for
example. So the material she made was General English because it talked about
daily routines, present tense, subject+verb 1,adverb of frequency, but it also was
an ESP. Why she thought it was an ESP because it did not talk about business
letter which was really business letter or reading about economics but she inserted
some reading related to economics and related to Accounting or business.
Then, at the first time she taught English in accounting department in the
first semester which is in 2014, she still used the book given by the university but
she also added the material she made herself. She did not think to modify the
materials into ESP because she thought at that time the ESP would be taught after
General English which was very general. and talked about many things. She
thought it would just related to ESP which would make the students ‘equiped
them to be ready in a real world’ later on. However her expectation was not that
way.
The General English then jumped to Looking for a Job topic. So Bahasa
Inggris 2 class was about job hunting. Job hunting here was looking for job
vacancy in the newspaper, then preparing for the interview and what should we do
in interview. At that time she thought there was something missing in the middle.
She expected the students should be able to describe a job, negotiating, and
promoting product because these topic were not discussed in General English. So
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
55
when Mr. Supar gave her a chance to manage her own material, she made the
bridging .She felt happy. She had herself self-actualized.
“So when I taught English 2 class which topic was Job Hunting, it
was the first time I taught Job Hunting. But when I got that
chance from Mr. Supar, he said “Ms. Vera for English class 1,2,3,
I trust you to make them accordingly”. I, at that time made a
bridge, “How if it is like this Sir”. Mr Supar at that time agreed
with me. I felt happy at that time” (2-V28-1-ET-T-SA).
Then she modified the book by just modifying the ideas. For example at
that time there were Introduction, Decribing Job, Describing Places, she modified
it to Asking and Giving Information. Although Asking and Giving Direction
seemed general but actually it had a lot of focus where the purpose was making
inquiries
“After I used the book once, then I modified the book, only took
the ideas such as introduction, describing jobs, and describing
places. I changed them into describing..asking and gicing
information because in the old version it was talikng about giving
direction. It was too specific. in my version asking giving
information was more general. Why they shoul learn asking
giving because it was not very general but later on it focused on
making inquiries“ (2-V28-1-ET-E-AU).
She said to her students that this was the year of 2000 and more but if
they did not know one word why did they should ask the teacher. She asked them
didn’t they know about the news. She hoped the students could find the word in
google by themselves. She told them that it was different from the time when she
were a student. In her time, the teacher taught her about Giving direction and it
was about go straight,etc. But it was different now. It was also about giving
information but they had to know about it automatically. They had to understand
that those things must be learned in English course not in the university because in
the university it was already the application not the theory anymore.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56
Started from that time, she made her own material which was really ESP
but still general in terms of the skills like speaking, reading, and listening. If it
was ESP, the topics would be about English for Business. But in her modified
materials she put complaining, handling complain which related to business.
“ In my class then I made my own teaching materials which were
really ESP but still general in the term of there were English
skills. It means that there were speaking, reading and listening.
But in real ESP there is discussion about English business which
really talks about business. In my materials, there was also
complaing-how to handle complain. Handling complain which
related to business “(2-V28-1-ET-E-AU).
Ms. Vera wanted her students to know kind of complains in business such as the
products, the lateness in delivery, and the failed transaction. They would also
learn about the vocabulary as well but it did not really focus on business.
b. Selecting the References
In selecting the references for her teaching materials, Ms. Widi just got the
textbook from the department. But she thought the book was not enough to fulfil
the students’ need so she modified the book here and there and added additional
information and materials.
“Okay. We got the textbook actually. But again the textbook was
you know like quite yaa.. it needed modification here and there
and additional information...additional materials” (1-W05-1-ET-
T-DIS).
While Ms. Vera prepared and designed the materials for her English class
using the books related to the teaching English to accounting department students.
She thought the textbook from the university had a lot of leak and lack. Therefore
she needed to patch the leak and added the materials needed. She went to
Gramedia bookstore to buy some books related to her teaching. One of the books
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57
she bought was not a book of teaching methods but a book of English for Bank
teller. This book was only for conversation or grammar. There was no steps of
teaching in that book.The books for teaching usually had introduction and
conversation.
“E..of course I used the books which related to academic..what I
mean books which were designed to be used to teach.I also used
the books which were sold in Gramed. They were not books for
teaching, For example English for Bank Teller. It contained
conversations only or only grammar. So there were no steps of
teaching. The books which were used for teaching usually contain
introduction,and then conversations” (2-V25-1-ET-E-AU).
She used general books like English for banking. It contained only banking terms
such as the expressions used in banking, vocabulary and conversations.
She also used internet for references. Because she thought references were
not only books. She could not say that references are the same as books and
printed books from publishers. She used references related to economics for
example Business English. They included newspaper, magazine, internet, news, et
cetera or materials which were taught for teaching business English. So when she
made a handout, the material which was the same with the handout was made by
herself. She designed the title, the example of conversations, making the boxes,
the grammar focus including the exercise. But for the example of conversation she
would refer to the example in the reference book. it could be similar to the book
or she just stealth the ideas and made her own conversations
“So when I made handouts or materials which were similar with
the handouts, I would make my really own design starting from
the title,conersations examples, making the boxes,and for the
grammar focus including the exercises. But for the example of the
conversations I would refer for example to a model or I would
take some smilar parts or just taking the ideas and made my own
version” (2-V25-1-ET-E-AU).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
58
She did it because she did not really like using the book from the
university. She thought the book from the university just copy paste from other
books and the authors just re-arranged the units
It became the point where I did not like teaching. If it used one
book at once it would be Okay but the book made by the faculty
was abook which took another book to be copy paste and be
rearaged. Well it was a quite good effort though..the original book
had 20 units but it took only 14 unit. (2-V25-1-ET-T-DIS).
Furthermore she explained the reason why she insisted on modifying the
book from the faculty:
“I just wanted to make the General English into more specific.
Actually we talked about the same thing. Daily routines, but not
my daily routines as a student for example” (3-V21-2-ET-T-SA).
She wanted to give her students more related topics which could fulfil her
students’ need as accounting students at that time. By giving specific topic but
still in line with the syllabus from faculty shows that she wanted to show her
capability in making the teaching materials and her own syllabus. She had self-
actualized herself.
Because she was aware that she still had to use the materials from the
faculty but it also had to be related to her students’ needs of English, so she
insisted whenever the students used I usually give or I always give or we always
have briefing in the morning, they had to apply in a work context. She thought the
material from the campus was okay, definitely okay but she just made it more
specific, in a real context.
“So whenever they used I usually give or I always give or we
always have briefing in the morning, they had to apply in a work
context. Just that. That was the reason.The material from the
campus was okay, definitely okay but I just made it more specific,
in a real context” (3-V21-2-ET-T-AW).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
59
c. Beginning the Class
There came the day for Ms. Vera and Ms. Widi to applied all the method
and materials they had. They felt enthusiast in teaching new students. Especially
for Ms. Vera,the begining of a semester was the most impressive event. At that
time her class was on the fourth floor but she forgot the name of the room. That
was in the meeting room. It was a very big room. Usually they used it for the
meeting. But in the next semester she begged the administrator to move her class
to other rooms because it was just too far for her to climb up the stairs. She did
not have a special card to go by lift. Then the administrator moved the class to
two rooms: room 52 and room 53. They were on the second floor. In the third
semester, her class was moved to room 52 and room 51.
“It was on the fourth floor but I don’t know, I forgot the name of
the room, but on the fourth floor, that is in the meeting room. it’s
a very big room. Usually they used it for the meeting. but the next
semester I begged to the administrator because it’s just too far. I
didn’t have the card to go by lift. and then they moved the class in
two room 52 and 53. That was on the second floor. and also in
semester 3, room 52 and room 51” (3-V14-2-ET-T-ST).
At that time her class was started at around 2.30 p.m. or 2 p.m. She remembered
she finished the class around 5 p.m.. So it was the last session class. The last
session class was at 2 p.m.or 2.30 p.m. until 5 or 5.10 p.m.
“I taught on the fourth floor. and the fourth floor is kind of far.
and then me as..you know what do you called it part time teacher,
I did not have my card to go through the lift so it’s kind of hard
for me and that time was around 2.30 or 2 p.m. because I
remember I finish around 5. So it was the last session. okay may
be you can check the schedule later in Sanata Dharma. The last
session for the class. may be 2 or 2.30 until 5 or 5.10 or
something.. yeah 5.10.” (3-V15-2-ET-T-ST).
For her English class, she got a syllabus from the faculty. She sometimes
followed the syllabus given. There was Introduction topic in the first meeting
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
completed with the copies of handouts for her students. But she felt a little bit
frustrated because of that. She felt burdensome because according to the syllabus
she had to give material and handouts to the students at their first meeting
directly. She did not like giving many copies of handouts to her students but in the
end they were not used by the students. She was a little bit disappointed because
of that. She agreed with Mr. Supar that at the beginning of semester at the first
meeting the teacher should focus on the introduction of syllabus and the class
foundations or rules.
“I sometimes followed the syllabus given by the faculty. There
was Introduction topic in the first meeting completed with the
copies of handouts for her students. But I felt a little bit...
frustrated because I felt burdensome because I should directly
give the material to the students at their first meeting. I did not
like giving many copies of handouts to my students but in the end
they were not used at all by the students. I was a little bit
disappointed because of that. I agreed with Mr. Supar that at the
beginning of semester, at the first meeting the teacher should
focus on the introduction of syllabus and the class foundations or
rules “ (2-V2-1-ET-T-DIS).
In her class, she applied a kind of system. She really underlined the word
‘education’. Educating for her was not only teaching but education in the sense of
teaching. At the beginning of the semester, her students were fresh graduate of
senior high school. They had not got the culture of university students yet so they
were easy to be directed to built the culture. When they were in the fourth
semester they had already a culture such as being late was okay and thought that
English class was easy. Here Ms. Vero was aware that she got a power to change
these students’s mindset. Therefore she put a foundation in her first meeting
because the first meeting of her English class was important for her. It was the
foundation for the whole semester. So at first she set the goal together with the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
61
students. The goal was about learning process and how to learn English in her
class: “The first was about goal, about learning itself, and also how to learn
English“ (3-V11-2-ET-T-AW).
In her first meeting she agreed with Mr. Supar, the head of accounting
department that in the first meeting she had to tell the students the syllabus first,
everything related to teaching learning process for that one semester, what the
would do that semester, how would they do it, and the class rules. So when she
entered the classroom for the first time at that time, the students underestimated
her. They thought that she was only an assistant of their English teacher because
she looked so young with her small and not really tall body. Then she was stand
still and be quiet. By being quiet, she had stolen her students’ attention. The
students looked at her, tried to find out who was she. They had several comments
about her.
By being quiet, I looked for, stole the students’ attention. I was
quiet and they saw me, tried to look for who I am. They would
have certain comments just like in the previous class. A funny
experience was happened when I was teaching English in
Management programme, they thought that I was their lecturer
assisstant. But then I cut it down” (2-V6-1-ET-T-SA).
Then suddenly she asked a question to them, “What are you doing here?”
The students were surprised and answered “ study, study”. But Ms. Vera said she
did not want to teach students just like ordinary teacher. She told them that she
would facilitated them. She wanted them to help each other and to be independent
student. She always asked the students to be more independent. About accounting
itself, she said to the students that, “Okay so you are learning here and you are
learning English and then you are accounting students so let’s make a kind of
connection. So what if you are accounting students,so what if you are learning
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
62
English. So setting the goal that you are learning English here because you need
that” (3-V11-2-ET-T-SA). After setting the goal together with her students, she
set up an activity to get to know each other , the teacher and the students, the
names. She asked the students to introduce their names and also where they came
from.
“Getting to know each other , the teacher and the students, the
names. and then also usually I asked the students to Introduce
their name and also where they come from. Only two important
things. important data” (3-V12-2-ET-T-AW).
In the first meeting she had also never given any kind of paper related to
material related to her English class. She asked the students to copy the material
or she made her own handout or she just gave one piece of paper for the next
meeting instead. She gave her own material because based on her experience the
material she got from the campus-the General English was too general.
“And why I gave my own material because based on my
experience I got the material from the campus-the General
English was too general” (3-V21-2-ET-E-AU).
By making her own handout she has become autonomous.
While for Ms. Widi, it was hard for her at first to teach such a big class.
She thought it was pretty hard to manage a big class with a quite a lot of students
in the class but she managed the class by having three teaching assisstants. All of
them were actually her students in English letters department. So she did not think
that it was really hard anymore compared to her previous class experience because
in her previous class she was just alone there without any teaching assistant at all.
At that time she had to manage a very big class by herself and she found it was
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
63
too overwhelming for her. She felt like it was hard to have a lot of students
especially all the students at that time who came from the same batch.
“I had to manage the very big class by myself and I found like it
was too overwhelming for me. You know like having quite you
know a lot of students ..all the students at that time they came
from the same batch”(1-W03-1-ET-T-ST).
So her class at that time was started at 2 p.m. and ended at 5p.m. She felt it
was a really really long and tiring class. And what made it worse was that after
that class, English class, still the students had more class up to 8 p.m. So it was
really challenging thing for her.
“So the class started from 2 up to 5. It was really really long and
tiring and what made it worse is that after that class, English
class, still they had more class after that up to 8 p.m. so yes..
really it’s really challenging thing for me” (1-W04-1-ET-T-ST).
So she encouraged her self and also her teaching assisstants to always
bring their very best to class, how to make the class funnier and more interesting.
She thought that they were there to create a kind of medium , a place, so that they
were so happy studying English with them no matter what their background at
that time was (1-W04-1-ET-T-ST). She was aware at that time that syllabus was
important. That was the guidance. But it did not mean that she and her assisstants
could not modify it. They could modifiy it. Again it depended on the current
situations. It depended on how the teachers’ belief. It depended on their belief
because again they thought syllabus was syllabus. But she did believe at that time
that by having such kind of classroom management or classroom activities then
her classroom at that time was much more interesting (1-W04-1-ET-E-AU).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
64
2. Teaching the Lesson
a. Delivering the Materials
In the next days, both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera had to the teach the lesson
based on the syllabus they had made. In her previous class, Ms Widi focused on
TOEFL because it almost TOEFL like so she took the materials from TOEFL
book. But in her second class, the focus was really different. Her second class
which was last semester the focus was on the English for really for
communication. She was aware that she needed to encourage students to speak
more and to express their opinions. So she gave them varied interesting topics to
cover because those topics were quite current topics. They also talked about
green life, global warming and also about culture and tradition. By giving these
topics the students learned to speak English in interesting way.
“In my previous class I would call it so, the focus was on TOEFL
because it almost TOEFL like so I took the materials from
TOEFL book so the focus really different but in my second class,
last semester the focus was on the English for really for
communication. So these students were encouraged to speak, to
express their opinions in the topics vary from quite..ya..quite
interesting topics to cover because those topics are quite current
topics so for example like we talked about green life, about global
warming and also about culture, tradition” (1-W03-1-ET-T-AW).
They also talked about legends, stories-stories from their own homeland.
Ms. Widi thought it was pretty interesting. It was also about sports and job
application so it was really ESP in her opinion. She thought her second class was
more interesting in terms of their topics and coverage. She felt disappointed with
her first class. Her first class was not that challenging in term of materials
because it was really TOEFL. TOEFL had to deal with listening, structure and
reading.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
65
“My first class was not that challenging I mean in term of
materials because it’s really TOEFL. TOEFL had to deal with
..you know..like listening, structure and reading” (1-W03-1-ET-T-
DIS).
But in her second class, she thought it was more than that. What she meant
by more than that was because in speaking they had to express their opinions on a
certain thing, on a certain topic and they needed to speak up. Besides, she could
like quite modified her class, her materials such as in a topic called global
warming which was about green life. Here she had herself an autonomy to make
her class interesting.
“But in the second class..more than that. I mean more than that
because in speaking they had to express their opinions on a
certain thing, on a certain topic and they needed to speak up in
even “I could.. you know like.. quite modified my class, my
materials”. Say for example in a topic called global warming,
green life” (1-W03-1-ET-E-AU).
Not only talking about interesting topics, she also tried to dig out her
students potentials by asking her students to go in front of the class to talked about
their products, which in the very previous meeting she told them to make very
simple products like recycling products. So one week after that they came to the
class bringing their own products in a quite green product. She thought it was very
inspiring. She had herself self-actualized.
“I also asked my students to go in front of the class to talked
about their products because the very..in the very previous
meeting I told them to make very simple products like recycling
so one week after that they came to class bringing their own
products in a..quite green product, very inspiring” (1-W03-1-ET-
T-SA).
She also felt proud of her students in a way like how can a bottle-just like
mineral bottle suddenly became a pencil case and a cosmetic case. For her, what
her students has done at that time was really interesting especially in how could
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
like newspaper-used newspaper suddenly became like a bracelet or rings,
something like that. To be honest, it was surprising her. She thought that it was
really great that they came up with quite different ideas. She was proud that her
students was aware of the environment and could present their ideas using
English. She also thought that the class was also great in term of their
performance because she asked them to play play performance and they
performed legends or fables, short stories based on their understanding. She asked
them to ‘redifined’ again what is meant by short stories, love stories and also
legends and also European stories like Romeo and Juliet or like Hamlet. She
would like them to really redifined what was meant by Romeo and Juliet and if it
was possible they had to create their own version
“How can a bottle just like mineral bottle suddenly became like
you know pencil case, cosmetic case. To me..it’s really
interesting. In how could like newspaper..used newspaper
suddenly became like bracelet or rings something like that..Oh my
God ..it’s pretty interesting I mean to be honest it was surprising
in a..it was really great that they came up with quite different
ideas. And this class was also great in term of their performance
because I asked them to play play performance so they performed
legends or fables, short stories based on their understanding so I
asked them to ”redifined” again what is meant by short stories,
love stories and also legends and also say for example like you
know European stories like Romeo and Juliet or like Hamlet“ (1-
W03-1-ET-T-FPS).
Digging out her students’ potentials was one of Ms. Wedo’s goal of
teaching English. So at first before her students played the mini drama in front of
the class, she thought that her students needed to understand what was meant by
Romeo and Juliet and how they observed Romeo and Juliet. They also had a play
performance like Sampek Eng Tay. They also had a play perfomance like Little
Mermaid but with their own drama version. She thought what her students had
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
67
done was really interesting. All of the students were also really eager to do the
play and they were really happy. They also told her that it was the first time for
them to perform the mini play performance.
“They had like little mermaid but with their own version. It’s
really interesting. And all of the students were really really eager
to do so and they were really happy and they told me: Oh miss to
be honest this is the first time for us to.. you know like perform
the drama, mini play but we called mini play in English that’s the
very first experience” (1-W03-1-ET-T-SA).
Being able to digging out her students potentials shows that Ms. Widi also had
dug out her own potentials in teaching English through mini drama. It means that
she had self-actualized herself.
Meanwhile, Ms. Vera’s first semester English class was also General
English class. She made the objective of her class was learning General English
but the focus was on speaking, writing, and reading skills but in quite general
topics and general themes like talking about daily activity, hobbies, routines, past
experiences and future experiences. Therefore in the second semester, she focused
her English class on English for Specific Purposes. The English class topics were
about getting a job and being an enterpreneur. The teaching materials were about
job hunting and being an enterpreneur, so the students were assumed as the people
who had company so they acted like persons who had a company. The materials
were also about reporting the company performance, describing the activities of a
person who was being in a specific position in a company, handling complains,
telephoning and meeting clients.
“Okay I focused more on the specific purpose. It was about getting a job
and being an enterpreneur so of course the material was about job hunting and for
being enterpreneur, so they were assumed as the people who had company so they
acted like person who had a company so the material was about reporting the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
68
company performance and then describing the activities of being specific position
in a company, handling complains, and then telephoning and then meeting client,
things like that. And then for the semester 3 it’s about TOEFL” (3-V20-2-ET-E-
AU).
By focusing on English for Specific purposes, she wanted to fulfil the
needs of accounting department students who needs English for business and
economics. It shows that Ms. Vera was not dependent on the syllabus given by the
faculty but she became autonomous by developing the materials given by the
faculty.
She also asked the students to order the jumbled sentences as the activity
in this class. From this activity, the students analyzed the text. After analyzing the
text, they wrote which one was describing job, which sentences showed it, and the
tenses used in the text. Then they concluded it themselves.
“I asked them to jumble the sentences. Then asked them to
analyze the text. After analyzing the text, they wrote which one
for example was describing job, which sentences showed it, and
which tenses used in the text. They concluded it themselves“ (2-
V25-1-ET-T-SA).
It shows that Ms. Vera dig out her students potentials through the activities in the
class. By digging out her students’ potentials, she shows her ability in delivering
materials and therefore it shows her self-actualization.
Furthermore, she made her own handout and used it in the class, prepared
the power point, the movies, listening material, and games for her class in order
the whole class to participate. By doing this, she became autonomous.
“So interesting..so it was like this..Actually I used material and
made my own material, prepared...what’s that..power point, my
own movies, listening, games...those were in order for the whole
class to participate” (2-V27-1-ET-E-AU).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
69
b. Managing the Class
In managing the big class, at first Ms. Widi felt it was hard.
“I had to manage the very big class by myself and I found like it
was too overwhelming for me. You know like having quite you
know a lot of students ..all the students at that time they came from
the same batch” (1-W03-1-ET-T-ST).
But then she struggled and encouraged herself and her teaching assisstants to
always bring their very best to class, how to make the class funnier and more
interesting. She meant they were there to create a kind of medium, a place so that
the students were happy studying English with them
“So I encouraged myself and also my teaching assisstants to always
bring our very best to class, how to make the class funnier in more
interesting ..I mean..we were there to create a kind of medium , a
place, a medium so that they were so happy studying English with
us” (1-W04-1-ET-T-ST).
She meant no matter what their background at that time, the most important thing
was to make her students happy. About the target she wanted to achieve in the
English class she taught at that time, she said that she did not know how to define
a target. She thought as long as the students could speak, and understood other
people’s discussion, other people’s utterances-she meant for the students who fell
into the inter level for example-that was actually her focus. So in order to reach
the target, she asked the students to mingle so that they were able to express their
opinions in a very basic level and also to speak up: “The target actually I wanted
them to be able to express their opinions. The very basic level and also to speak
up” (1-W11-1-ET-T-ST). They also struggled to improve the students’
vocabulary:
“So we developed their understanding first on certain vocabularies.
Then after that we asked them to read but yaa..after that they
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
70
discussed it with a friend for example. So we had like a group
work” (1-W05-1-ET-T-ST).
The topics that she gave to the students were also ranged from things which were
very famous and also from global warming and soon until things which were
really basic. It was like for example tales, legends, and so on. For her, tales were
very basic lessons. They become her students’ foundation because those tales
would define who her students were, because she thought those who came from
Medan for example, probably do not know Nyi Roro Kidul. By letting the students
to bring their local tales in the class using English, she dug up her students
potentials in speaking skills and therefore she self-actualized herself.
“So really they came to class, bringing with them their own local
values and local colors. But they express everything in English. So
I guess in my class, English, at that time really becoming the
bridge” (1-W11-1-ET-T-SA).
She said that bridging the difficulty of teaching, dealing with students and
materials was not really that hard. Probably because she bought wonder book
assisstance. So her assisstants-her three assisstants, they were really trained well
and she thought to be honest all of them were outstanding students in this
department so she did not feel at that time-faced difficulties or hard time. It was
just how to make those students at the beginning really could keep up with other
students.
Managing a big class was not a big deal for Ms. Vera.Whether it was a big
class or small class, they were the same for her. The difference between the big
class and small class was that big class means more spaces where she needed to
walk more and to speak louder. But when she used the microphone in her first
teaching experience, it was not because of the students were noisy nor the big
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
71
number of students but because of the room which was long. So her struggle
began here. The room was not wide but it was a kind of long room. It was not
really convinient for teaching, and it was without air conditioner. So actually for
her first experience she did not do too many actions in the class. Firstly because it
was hot. There was no air conditioner.The class was just not big but long and the
number of students were 50. The first thing she did in the class was she asked the
students to sit at the front row until there was no blank space among them. It was
kind of tight sitting
“But I really used the microphone but I used the microphone in
my first experience not because of the students, not because of the
number of students but because of the room. The room was not
wide but it’s a kind of long room. It’s not really convinient, and
without air conditioner. So actually for my first experience I did
not do too many action in the class. Firstly because it’s hot.
There’s no air conditioner. And then the class was just e..not big
but long. And the students are 50. So the first thing to do is.. OK..
I asked the students to sit at the front row. I always feel that and
no blank space among them so it’s kind of tight sitting” (3-V16-2-
ET-T-ST).
Her struggle to make her students focused on the lesson was not only that.
When the class became hotter and hotter, she tried to make a kind of disguise
activity so that they forgot about the classroom situation. She tried to create games
and made jokes. She said she really loved making jokes. So whenever the students
felt like tired, she started playing the games-small games like a very simple one
such as counting games one, two, three, boom. She decided to use counting games
in her class because they were accounting students.Then after that, she put the
students into group. Whenever they did the activity in a group, they would be very
busy, then they forgot the hot day and the hot temperature in the class. It was her
struggle in managing the big class.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
72
The class will be hotter and they experienced that. The class was
just hotter and hotter but I try to like make a kind of disguise
activity so that we forget about the situation. Just like games. And
you know I like making jokes too. I really love making jokes so
whenever the students feel like tired or what, usually I started
with the games. Small games like it’s a very simple one so for
example counting games one, two, three, boom. You know that
games? just that, counting game. They are accounting students.
And then after that grouping . Whenever it did in a group of
course the students would be very busy, they forgot the hot day,
in the hot situation like that. (3-V16-2-ET-T-ST).
Furthermore, she also had other strategies in managing her big class. The
first strategy was she tried to be so fit so she could speak loudly in the classroom.
The second strategy was she asked the students to sit at the front row without
spaces and then put them in a group. Grouping was the best way because the class
was big. In grouping, she never asked the students to make a group by themselves.
But sometimes she asked the students to make their own group but she avoided
the students to find the groups with the people they like only. Because she needed
the students to help one another.
She also gave the students more chances to speak English in front of the
class. At first she appointed them in a group one by one. She said to her students,
“OK group e..OK class now you have to practice at home so I just invite 5 groups.
Only invite 5 groups so practice in front of the class and I’m going to give you
point”. The result was smart students raised their hands very fast. Then after the
activity had finished, she said to her students that on that day there were only five
students who had gone in front of the class and they had already done it very well
but next week she wanted the other students to do it, “Okay. Your group, your
group, your group I don’t know who. May be I will give chances only two or three
groups, so you must practice”. Actually the group she mentioned was the group
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
73
with the students who were quite weak. She always gave a kind of equal portion
for the practice. She appointed the weak students to be the leader or to lead the
class. She said “ I always gave a kind of equal portion for the practice. And I
appointed them to be the leader or to lead the class” (3-V26-2-ET-T-EQ). By
doing this she wanted to give equal chances to the weak students to speak up in
front of the class.
Therefore, she felt proud of her students because they were cooperative
and enthusiastic during the class. She said that they also had a high siprit in
learning English. Furthermore she said that her students were on time to the class
and did not like playing with their mobile phones.
“I’m OK. The students were cooperative and they were so
enthusiastic to join my class. And they were really eager to learn
in my class and they had a very high spirit. I had never found my
students were late or like to nod or put the head on the table or
tried to play with their phone. I had never found that. So I just
called my class was so amazing. So I found..Ok maybe problem
like the audio did not work, things like that. But generally for the
class for the learning teaching process was just fine. The students
always did the homework.They helped one another. Sometimes I
asked the students to lead the class and they did it very well. And
they came to the class on time. No significant problem was in the
class. I was very proud of them. Really “(3-V23-2-ET-T-FPS).
c. Dealing with Weak Students
Weak students were always be a consent for good teachers. Ms. Widi
together with her assisstants struggled for their weak students to be able to speak
English well. They at that time were discussing first about how to deal with the
weak students. They had a quite long discussion, concerning the ‘weak students’.
She felt really fortunate that she only had very few weak students but still she had
to address them right. So she at that time-after she had a quite long discussion-
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
74
then decided to give the weak students more opportunity and longer time to speak
in front of the class.
“O ya. So I at that time..My assisstants and I, We were discussing
first. we had a quite long discussion, concerning the “weak
students”. I really..fortunate that I was only very few weak
students but still we to address them right so I at that time after
we had a quite long discussion then we decided to give the weak
students more opportunity to speak in front of the class and we
gave them longer time“ (1-W06-1-ET-T-ST).
But because there were a lot of students, Ms. Widi and her assisstants
needed to limit the time. If they did not limit the time then they would be running
out of time. It was Ms. Widi’s emphaty toward her weak students that she decided
to give more time to them to speak in front of the class. So at that time she and her
assistants decided to give more portion to the weak students because while
speaking the weak students needed a pause or a break. Their speaking skill in this
case their fluency was not that high so they needed time to think about
vocabularies, to think about grammar so Ms. Widi and her assistants decided to
give them more portion, more time to speak. Time limitation was applied in her
class but not to that weak students.
“So at that time we gave more portion to the weak students
because while speaking they needed like pause, break. Their
speaking probably, their fluency was not that high so they needed
time to think about vocabularies probably, to think about
grammar probably so yes we decided to give them more portion,
more time. So the time limitation..yes, it was applicable but not to
that weak students so still we gave them time” (1-W06-1-ET-T-
EM).
Ms. Widi and her assistants also encouraged the weak students to be
equally participated in the class activities. Because they always had a groupwork
for the activity in the classroom so the students were divided into different
groupworks so the weak students usually came together or sat together with
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
75
students with quite good English proficiency. The activity was like mingling
activity. So in dealing with those weak students, she managed to make them
mingle with the students with quite high sense of English proficiency.
“And also we encourage them to..because we always had a
groupwork so we divided into different groupworks so they
usually came together or sat together with students with quite
good English proficiency so..like minggling. So dealing with
those students, those kind of students so I managed to make them
mingle with students with quite high sense of English
proficiency” (1-W06-1-ET-T-EQ).
To know whether the students were weak or not Ms. Vera gave a lot of
activities in her class may be about two third or two three of the meetings. She at
that time gave the activities to make sure that this kind of students were quite
good in English. She actually did not really like judging people especially at the
first meeting. But after the third meeting she knew about which students were
weak which ones were strong. Then she motivated the weak ones. But not
motivating them merely because the students were weak, but motivating them in
the sense of challenging them. Because there were a lot of things she had to do in
the class so she gave bigger portion to the weak students to do activity or do
something.
Eventhough the students at that time said that they could not do it she said
that was why they should do it, to practice. They said they could not speak
English. She said that was why you should learn to speak. But they were shy. She
said they had to go in front of the class for many times so that they would not be
shy. They said that their grammar was bad. She asked them to study. She said
actually they were smart but they need to study more about many things. For the
students who only looked for the score, when she gave challenging questions they
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
76
would compete each other to answer the questions. Therefore she gave them
conversation if it was not for scoring purpose.
For the conversation practice, she chose and asked the students to practice
it in front of the class because her target at that that time was the weak students. It
did not mean that she fed them but she wanted to motivate them. Those weak
students had bad pronunciation, hesitated when speak, and read one sentence for a
long time. But the conversation practice motivated them. She said to them that it
was very good and thank them for that.
She also gave feed back to her students while they worked in a group for
conversation practice. The feedback in the form of writing or for the very weak
students she told it directly. She thought it was waste of time but she tried to
motivate them. She sometimes called them personally. Especially for the students
from the three semesters she had taught in line.
There were a lot of weak students in Ms. Vera’s class at that time. So she
struggled for her weak students in order to be able to speak up their minds in
English by opening additional class for the first time for free especially for her
weak students. In that class she let them playing games that made them speaking.
“Unfortunately, in my previous class I had a lot of weak students.
So it was a special time, my first time, during my experience of
teaching in Sanata Dharma university to give additional lesson to
my students, especially for my weak students. It was free. In this
class I only let them playing games as many as they wanted to
play in order for them to be confident in speaking” (2-V27-1-ET-
T-ST).
They had conversations. From this class, they became active students in
her English class because they were motivated. They became more confident.
When they were confident they got more score. So she said to her weak students
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
77
at that time that they would get extra score. It seemed that the extra score was
from her but actually it was from the students themselves because they became
more confident.
Not only she motivated them but also she had chit chat with them, hung
out together, and sent messages to each other through Whatsapp. She made a
personal bridge with them. They felt comfortable with her. She always said to her
student to help their friends. She asked one student who seems quite weak to be
the leader in one group. She said to the students that they could speak in Bahasa
just a little bit whenever they became the leader or at least they had to ask their
friend to read the instruction of their homework in English.When the leader who
was a weak student spoke in a wrong way, the other students would help. She said
that it was a little bit difficult to monitor the students but she tried. She moved
around the class all the time from one group to another group and checked them.
But when the class moved to another room, it was easier for her to check the
students or to monitor them.
For the second and the third semester students, for the next level, she
usually asked for the ‘strong’ students to help her to check the ‘weak’ students or
to monitor the other students. Furthermore she said that at the beginning of the
class was not easy to differentiate which student was weak which student was not.
But for her it was not really a big deal. Whenever she dealt with those kind of
students, they were not a problem in the class. But they had their own problem. So
the things that she had to manage was she had to help them by giving them more
chances.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
78
She also did not differentiate the students to the smart ones and the weak
ones. She let them to mingle and participate together in every activity. It was her
effort to treat them equally.
“That’s all. So I would not differentiate the smart students in
English from the weak ones. I would not make the smart students
become the special ones..No. So I usually let them mingle and
participate in every activity dulu” (2-V27-1-ET-T-EQ).
She also gave feedback to the students after conversation practice which
was a pairwork. The feedback was in the form of written feedback or oral
feedback if the students were really weak in English. She said to the students that
they were great and they actually had good potencial in English. They only
needed more practice. It is a way to show her empathy towards her students.
“Then, for example in a pairwork conversation, I always gave
them feedback in a written form or if the students made a lot of
mistakes I would tell them directly. It seemed waste of time. I
would tell them, you were great. You have potential in English.
But you need to do more practices” (2-V27-1-ET-T-EM).
3. Finishing the Class
a. Assessing the Students
Ms. Widi said that her students at that time spoke English really well.
Because like 80% of them got an A or B. It was not because she was too easy to
give the mark but because they were able to show the best performance, they
really eager to learn to study and moreover they brought with them the highest
spirit to the class especially because it was a class with 3 credits. The class was
started from 2 p.m. up to 5 p.m. It was a really really long and tiring class and
what made it worse was that after that English class, they still had more class
after that up to 8 p.m. So it was really challenging thing for her as a teacher.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
79
Therefore she was aware that she needs to do assessment of her students
progress. For assessing the writing skill, she said that she and her assisstants had
a rubric for the assessment. So for the writing, they had grammar, and then they
have coherence just like what they had in their studying of faculty. For the
speaking, it was like fluency and soon. So she had already gave her assisstants the
rubric for assessment.
“We had a rubric for the assessment. So for the writing we had of
course grammar, and then we have coherence just like what we
were in our studying of faculty. So for the speaking it’s like
fluency and soon so I already gave my assisstant the rubric” (1-
W08-1-ET-T-AW).
Ms. Vera was also aware that assessment was important. In other way than
Ms. Widi, Ms. Vera did the scoring when she gave challenges to her students.
When they had finished learning conversation, she said to her students that in the
next meeting she would gave them a chance. Whoever wanted to take her
challenge, she would give a kind of reward. She did not ask the students-a couple
of student directly to perform in front of the class tomorrow or next week. But she
always said to them to prepare themselves.
The students who did not know her style of teaching would take the
chance for granted. But when they went in front of the class, she told them that
they got special score namely daily score and usually she gave them a bonus such
as candy, chocolate, et cetera. Since then it improved their awareness. She did not
need to ask the students to go in front of the class anymore. It was their decision.
When the students said they would go in front of the class by their own inisiative,
it was raising their competence and also courage. When one of the students was
dare to go in front of the class, the others followed. Sometimes after two meetings
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
80
the students who went in front of the class were the same persons. So in the next
meeting she said to the class that she gave the chance to the persons who had
never gone in front of the class in the two meetings before. It was her way of
giving daily score. The other ways were giving quiz, home assignment, group
project. She often gave group project in the mid semester.
She explained that she assessed the students not only through the
evaluation in the last semester through the test only. Test, evaluation, assessment.
So she assessed the students through their performance, their process, from the
very first meeting until the end of the semester. Every single thing. She assessed
them from their daily performance. Daily performance included their activeness in
the class, whether they participated a lot or not, whether they participated in group
or not. She was aware that remembering the students’ names was important and
she has that kind of skills.
“I assessed the students not only through the evaluation last
semester through the test only. Test, evaluation, assessment. So I
assessed the students through their performance, their process,
from the very first meeting until the end of the semester. Every
single thing. I assessed them from their daily performance.Daily
performance included their activeness in the class, whether the
participated a lot or not, whether they participated in group or not.
So that’s why for me remembering the students was important
and I have that kind of skills” (3-V27-2-ET-T-AW).
However she may be forgot the name of one or two students. But she always tried
to remember the students. She did remember that this person was very active, that
person was not.That student had one participation, for the daily things.
For the daily performance, it was included in their speaking, writing and
sometimes on listening whenever they asked her question or not. It was including
listening already. For the daily assessment she usually helped the students to get
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
81
good score. For the final score, academically they had to submit mid semester
score, final semester score and then quizes and home assignment. But for her, she
added with the portfolio, homework, quiz and daily performance. She usually put
it in an assignment in the academic column. She also tested the students. She
tested whether they really know or not. Almost every meeting she tested them to
quizes.
She had so many quizes like vocabulary and general knowledge. General
knowledge for example about structure either written or spoken. Sometimes she
had sentences and they answered. She gave not only quiz but also test-the big test.
Before they had their oral test, they had written test, for example. Or after they
had oral test they had the written test. The written test could be about structure,
making dialogue or making a paragraph. But usually for the written test, it was
very personal. Just question for example. The question was about daily routines.
Although she would grade them through the structure, based on the structure but
the question was just like, “What do you usually do on Sunday?” for example. But
still the context was about job. They would answer, ”I usually go to the church”
for example.
By doing this kind of test, for her it was quite imposible for the students to
cheat. This was to eliminate the cheating. Because they had to give different
answers. For the mid test-the big examination, she had written and also oral test,
the oral presentation, interview, and dialogue-practising dialogue. But every
single subject had different type of test, type of assessment. For job hunting for
example she had to type all the test. The first was interview and the second was
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
82
presentation. The presentation was about company presentation. And then for the
General English, for the speaking, the oral test was about role play.
b. Giving Assignments or Homework
In the end of the class Ms. Widi gave a handout or homework to her
students. But it was only for writing skills. Because she did believe at that time
she was not a successful teacher if she gave them more burden. She understood
her students’ situation and felt empathy towards them. So she really strictly
managed the time and also the allocation of the time
“I did believe at that time I was not a successful teacher if I gave
them more burden. To me, homework could be a burden but it
could be not a burden. So my belief at that time that I wish only
giving them homework for the writing skills but not for other
skills. So we really strictly managed the time and also the
allocation of the time” (1-W07-1-ET-T-EM).
Meanwhile, it was a time to end Ms. Vera’s class. In finishing the class,
Ms. Vera applied a different method from Ms. Widi in her class. Firstly she asked
the students to sum up orally. They sum up together what they had learnt
previously. After that she asked the students to figure out what things that they
should do in the next meeting. They tried to get themselves like “we had to do this
one, this one”. After that she gave them encouragement statement. She said that
they were great. They did excellent job on that day. She also said to her students,”
You were really great, thank you very much for today, OK see you next week”. It
shows her understanding and empathy towards her students that her students need
to be motivated and appreciated in learning English. Sometimes, in the end of the
class, she made her own conclusion for the class on that day. For example the
class did not get enough practice. So she asked the students to improve their
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
83
performance especially for the weak students, she gave them more chance to
practice next week.
“Okay. After that I gave them what do you call it, encouragement
statement. And the most important thing was I always said that
they were great. They did excellent job at that day. That was the
ending of my lesson, the ending of my last word you were really
great, thank you very much for today, OK see you next week. Just
like that” (3-V24-2-ET-T-EM).
She also asked their opinion and feeling about the lesson that had just learned in
the end of the class.
“Firstly I asked the students to sum up. orally. we sum up together
what we learnt previously. and then after that I asked the students
to figure out what things that they might..they should do in the
next meeting. And they tried to get themselves.. oo.. ya.. we had
to do this one, this one” (3-V24-2-ET-T-EQ).
From the description of their lived experiences above, both Ms. Widi and
Ms. Vera shows their autonomy, awareness, understanding/empathy, struggle,
disappointment, self-actualization, equity, and their proud feelings of their
students. The meanings gained from the description are emergent themes and
there is no meaning which is included in pre-figured themes. Those emergent
themes are parts of the meanings of teaching English to the accounting department
students.
B. INTERPRETATION
The interpretation of the data in this study was based on the finding actions which
had been described in the previous discussion. There is no meaning from the pre-
figured themes. The meanings below are emergent themes.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
84
1. Autonomy
As lecturers, both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera made and adapted the materials
themselves and adjusted them with the syllabus given by the faculty. In preparing
and designing the materials, both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera were aware that they
need to use various references not only from the university.
Ms. Widi’s autonomy can be seen through her experience in modifying her
teaching materials. She was aware at that time that syllabus was important and
that was the guidance of teaching English. But it did not mean that she could not
modify it. She modified it depended on her need analysis of her students.
“Anyway as a lecturer as a teacher we..I myself did that. I
modified here and there..and again it depends on the ..on my need
analysis” (1-W04-1-ET-E-AU).
Furthermore in her second English class, she also showed her autonomy in
making the teaching materials. She modified the materials so that her students
could speak up more in the class. By speaking up more, her students’ skills in
English would improve.
“But in the second class..more than that. I mean more than that
because in speaking they had to express their opinions on a
certain thing, on a certain topic and they needed to speak up in
even “I could.. you know like.. quite modified my class, my
materials”. Say for example in a topic called global warming,
green life” (1-W03-1-ET-E-AU).
Her autonomy can also be seen when she adapted the textbook to be more
interesting and useful materials so that her students enjoyed learning English with
her. Eventhough she still stuck at the syllabus from the faculty but at that time she
tried to be an autonomous and creative teacher, so that her English class became
more interesting.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
85
“In a..but overall we still stick to the syllabus and also the
textbook but we modified or added by having more activities. So
we divided in two, say for example the very first one is the
introduction, usually we had ice breaking. ya...ya.. come on that’s
really mainstream . That’s teacher always do right. and The
second one we did like I think more funny, interesting activities.
It’s like reading but reading in very interesting way” (1-W05-1-
ET-E-AU).
It means that the textbook was not enough to be the only source of teaching.
Therefore she at that time thought that she needed to be autonomous and creative
in developing or modifying the materials.
Ms. Vera’s autonomy can be seen when she carefully selected the books
which were related to business or banking because she was aware and understood
that she needed to give her students English which met their needs so that later on
her students will be able to use it for their job.
“E..of course I used the books which related to academic..what I
mean books which were designed to be used to teach.I also used
the books which were sold in Gramed. They were not books for
teaching, For example English for Bank Teller. It contained
conversations only or only grammar. So there were no steps of
teaching. The books which were used for teaching usually contain
introduction,and then conversations” (2-V25-1-ET-E-AU).
She also adapted and developed the ideas from the references books to be
more interesting and be able to fulfil her students’ needs.
“So when I made handouts or materials which were similar with
the handouts, I would make my really own design starting from
the title,conersations examples, making the boxes,and for the
grammar focus including the exercises. But for the example of the
conversations I would refer for example to a model or I would
take some smilar parts or just taking the ideas and made my own
version” (2-V25-1-ET-E-AU).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
86
Furthermore, she made her own handout and used it in the class, prepared
the power point, the movies, listening material, and games for her class in order
the whole class to participate. By doing this, she became autonomous.
“So interesting..so it was like this..Actually I used material and
made my own material, prepared...what’s that..power point, my
own movies, listening, games...those were in order for the whole
class to participate” (2-V27-1-ET-E-AU).
She also made the topics in the textbook given by the faculty to be more specific
and adapted the materials according to her students’ need of English.
“After I used the book once, then I modified the book, only took
the ideas such as introduction, describing jobs, and describing
places. I changed them into describing..asking and giving
information because in the old version it was talking about giving
direction. It was too specific. in my version asking giving
information was more general. Why they shoul learn asking
giving because it was not very general but later on it focused on
making inquiries“ (2-V28-1-ET-E-AU).
Her autonomy can also be seen from her effort in making the General
English into ESP. It shows that as an English teacher who taught at the accounting
department she was be able to control her students’ way of learning and
autonomously modified the materials.
“ In my class then I made my own teaching materials which were
really ESP but still general in the term of there were English
skills. It means that there were speaking, reading and listening.
But in real ESP there is discussion about English business which
really talks about business. In my materials, there was also
complaing-how to handle complain. Handling complain which
related to business “(2-V28-1-ET-E-AU).
In her second semester English class, she modified the syllabus and made the
teaching materials into ESP which was more suitable for her accounting
department students.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
87
“Okay I focused more on the specific purpose. It was about
getting a job and being an enterpreneur so of course the material
was about job hunting and for being enterpreneur, so they were
assumed as the people who had company so they acted like
person who had a company so the material was about reporting
the company performance and then describing the activities of
being specific position in a company, handling complains, and
then telephoning and then meeting client, things like that. And
then for the semester 3 it’s about TOEFL” (3-V20-2-ET-E-AU).
Furthermore she stated the reason she modified the teaching materials from the
faculty.
“And why I gave my own material because based on my
experience I got the material from the campus-the General
English was too general” (3-V21-2-ET-E-AU).
From the statements above it was clear that both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera were
autonomous teachers. It is in line with Benson’s statement (2001: 47) who said
that autonomy is “the capacity to take control of one’s own learning”. Both of the
teachers had shown their autonomy through their effort in modifying the syllabus,
teaching materials and managing the class so that they could fufill their students’
need of English.
2. Awareness
Preparing and designing the materials is important thing to do for teachers.
Therefore before Ms. Widi and Ms Vera taught the students, they prepared what
they would teach to their students. For Ms. Widi, she did the need analysis before
she made the lesson plan and the material. This need analysis was meant to know
her students’s need. It shows that Ms. Widi was aware of her students’ need and
understand that her students needed English which was different from English for
other department students.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
88
“I needed to know my class, my students from the very first
meeting. So in the very first meeting, I really observed at that
time what’s going on with my class, what’s going on with my
students, what’s going on with the interaction, the
communication, and also I..because it’s more on speaking yaa as a
teacher we easily found out probably a kind of different or
different in ability” ( 1-W04-1-ET-T-AW).
She was aware that her students was different in ability so she thought how
to make materials which was able to fulfil all students’ need. She was also aware
that the book she got from university was not able to fulfill the students’ need.
Therefore she did the action by modifying the materials.
Ms. Widi’s awareness can also be seen through her effort in encouraging
her students to speak more to express their opinions. So she gave them varied
interesting topics to cover because those topics were quite current topics. They
also talked about green life, global warming and also about culture and tradition.
By giving these topics the students learned to speak English in interesting way.
“In my previous class I would call it so, the focus was on TOEFL
because it almost TOEFL like so I took the materials from
TOEFL book so the focus really different but in my second class,
last semester the focus was on the English for really for
communication. So these students were encouraged to speak, to
express their opinions in the topics vary from quite..ya..quite
interesting topics to cover because those topics are quite current
topics so for example like we talked about green life, about global
warming and also about culture, tradition” (1-W03-1-ET-T-AW).
Ms. Vera also did the same thing in preparing and making the teaching
materials. She was aware that the syllabus from the university was not be able to
meet the students needs. So she did an action by modified the syllabus together
with the head of the department, Mr. Supar. She made the General English to be
more specific so that it was almost like ESP because she understood that her
students needed more than just common General English.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
89
“So whenever they used I usually give or I always give or we
always have briefing in the morning, they had to apply in a work
context. Just that. That was the reason.The material from the
campus was okay, definitely okay but I just made it more specific,
in a real context” (3-V21-2-ET-T-AW).
The teachers’ awareness can also be seen from the way they gave
assessments to their students. Assessment is a form to evaluate the process of
teaching and learning process. In assessing the students in term of giving tests or
assignments to get score, Ms.Widi was already well prepared because she and her
assistants had provided the rubric for assessing the students skills and
performance. It shows that Ms. Widi had awareness of her class because she
managed the class well.
“We had a rubric for the assessment. So for the writing we had of
course grammar, and then we have coherence just like what we
were in our studying of faculty. So for the speaking it’s like
fluency and soon so I already gave my assisstant the rubric” (1-
W08-1-ET-T-AW).
While Ms. Vera did it by giving a challenge in the middle of her lessons
besides giving her students tests to encourage them to be more confident. She
wanted the students to show their potentials regardless getting the score from their
teacher or not. But she was aware that giving assessment is an important process
in teaching English therefore she gave score to the students who dare to go in
front of the class. In order to be able to give score to the right students, she was
aware that she needed to know and remember her students’ names.
“Getting to know each other , the teacher and the students, the
names. and then also usually I asked the students to Introduce
their name and also where they come from. Only two important
things. important data” (3-V12-2-ET-T-AW).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
90
Her emphasis on the importance of remembering the students’ names shows her
awareness.
“I assessed the students not only through the evaluation last
semester through the test only. Test, evaluation, assessment. So I
assessed the students through their performance, their process,
from the very first meeting until the end of the semester. Every
single thing. I assessed them from their daily performance.Daily
performance included their activeness in the class, whether the
participated a lot or not, whether they participated in group or not.
So that’s why for me remembering the students was important
and I have that kind of skills” (3-V27-2-ET-T-AW).
When Ms. Vera applied a kind of system in her class, she was aware that
she got a power to change these students’s mindset. Therefore she put a
foundation in her first meeting because the first meeting of her English class was
important for her. It was the foundation for the whole semester. She set the goal
together with the students. The goal was about learning process and how to learn
English in her class: “The first was about goal, about learning itself, and also how
to learn English“ (3-V11-2-ET-T-AW). This awareness was needed to maintain
her class well. without this kind of awareness her class would not be easy to
manage. This awareness also applied in her class in order for the students and the
teacher had the same vision to reach the goal of learning English.
From the explanations above, it is clear that both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera
show their awareness of teaching English to the accounting department students.
Both of the teachers has shown what Lier talked about awareness. Awareness is a
person’s consciousness of the things that he/ she is doing. Lier (2013: p 11) said
that to learn something new one must first notice it. This noticing is an awareness
of its existence, obtained and enhanced by paying attention to perceptual powers
in the rigt direction, making mental ‘energy’ available for processing. Processing
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
91
involves linking something that is perceived in the outside world to structures
(pattern of connections). Educational settings require awareness of learning
strategies and processes, social awareness of classroom structures, awareness of
learning and teaching styles and so on.
3. Understanding/Empathy
Understanding is defined as a sufficient grasp of concepts, principles or skills
so that one can bring them to bear on new problems and situations, deciding in
which ways one’s present competencies can suffice and which ways one may
require new skills or knowledge (Gardner in Weggins,1998: 83). In managing
such a big class, both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera had some strategies to handle their
students because they believed and understood that it was not easy. Both of them
tried to understand their students’ feelings and ability in English. They
empathized their students by understanding their situations and helping them to
learn English in an interesting way.
Ms. Widi’s understanding and empathy towards her students’ feeling and
ability were shown by her decision to not giving many tasks to her students. She
thought that if a teacher gave many tasks to her students it indicated that the
teacher was not a succesful teacher. Therefore when the class was ended, she gave
her student only a handout or homework for writing skills. She felt she gave more
burden to her students if she gave a lot of tasks.
“I did believe at that time I was not a successful teacher if I gave
them more burden. To me, homework could be a burden but it
could be not a burden. So my belief at that time that I wish only
giving them homework for the writing skills but not for other
skills. So we really strictly managed the time and also the
allocation of the time” (1-W07-1-ET-T-EM).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
92
Being appreciated and given attention are everyone’s needs. Ms. Vera
understood the importance of these things, therefore she gave appreciation to her
students by giving encouragement in the end of the class. She also told them that
they were great students and had done excellent job that day.
“Okay. After that I gave them what do you call it, encouragement
statement. And the most important thing was I always said that
they were great. They did excellent job at that day. That was the
ending of my lesson, the ending of my last word you were really
great, thank you very much for today, OK see you next week. Just
like that” (3-V24-2-ET-T-EM).
Both Ms.Widi and Ms. Vera understood that they had to give more
attentions to their weak students. Therefore Ms. Widi decided to give her weak
students more portion to speak in front of the class and gave them longer time
than their smart friends.
“So at that time we gave more portion to the weak students
because while speaking they needed like pause, break. Their
speaking probably, their fluency was not that high so they needed
time to think about vocabularies probably, to think about
grammar probably so yes we decided to give them more portion,
more time. So the time limitation..yes, it was applicable but not to
that weak students so still we gave them time” (1-W06-1-ET-T-
EM).
It shows that Ms. Widi had empathy and understanding of her students’ situation
at that time and did the action to help them. She understood that teaching was not
merely about transferring knowledge but also how to pay attention to the weak
students and helped all students to improve their English.
Ms. Vera also had the same strategy as Ms. Widi. She gave her weak
students bigger portion to speak in front of the class. She believed that it would
motivate them and made them found out their potentials. She had intention that by
being confident her student would get more score.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
93
She also gave feedback to the students after conversation practice which
was a pairwork. The feedback was in the form of written feedback or oral
feedback if the students were really weak in English. She said to the students that
they were great and they actually had good potencial in English. They only
needed more practice. It is a way to show her empathy towards her students.
“Then, for example in a pairwork conversation, I always gave
them feedback in a written form or if the students made a lot of
mistakes I would tell them directly. It seemed waste of time. I
would tell them, you were great. You have potential in English.
But you need to do more practices” (2-V27-1-ET-T-EM).
The explanations above shows that Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera had
understanding and empathy towards their students. Understanding helps one to
judge possible responses that come to mind and rejecting those that are
inconsistent with some of the facts (Cronbach, 1963). An understanding helps
teacher to decide any action and reaction that she/he does because understanding
is a mind representation of the teacher.
The explanations above also show Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera’s belief about
teaching. Teacher’s belief, which is part of experience can inform educational
practice in ways that prevailing study has not and is essential to improve their
professional preparation and teaching practices (Pajaras, 1992). It takes teacher to
determine certain attitude on her/his teaching because she/he has certain belief
about her/his students. In essence, belief is concerned with values (Lonergan,
1958). Belief is expression of values and feelings of people toward something.
4. Self-actualization
Koltko-Rivera (2006: 303) stated that self-actualization is to seek
fulfilment of a personal potential. Both Ms. Vera and Ms. Widi also seeked for
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
94
their own potentials. They had themselves self-actualized through teaching
English to the accounting department students.
When Ms. Vera entered the classroom for the first time at that time, what
she looked for at that time was her students’ attention. By given attention from her
students, she stated her existance as a teacher or a lecturer. It was important for
her because it was a way for her to go through her students mind. It was easy to
manage the class and transfer her knowledge if she had already know her students
well. It was also a way for her to show her students that she was a capable and
potential teacher.
By being quiet, I looked for, stole the students’ attention. I was
quiet and they saw me, tried to look for who I am. They would
have certain comments just like in the previous class. A funny
experience was happened when I was teaching English in
Management programme, they thought that I was their lecturer
assisstant. But then I cut it down” (2-V6-1-ET-T-SA).
Furthermore, after she got her students’ attention then she began questioned
her students about their purpose in studying English. She tried to open her
students’ minds about it and set the goal together so that they would have the
same vision in learning English. By doing this she tried to dig out her students
potentials which means that she also dug out her own potential as a teacher.
“Okay so you are learning here and you are learning English and
then you are accounting students so let’s make a kind of
connection. So what if you are accounting students,so what if you
are learning English. So setting the goal that you are learning
English here because you need that” (3-V11-2-ET-T-SA).
Besides that, she also dug out her students’ potentials through activities in the
class. By digging out her students’ potentials, she shows her ability in delivering
materials and therefore it shows her self-actualization.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
95
“I asked them to jumble the sentences. Then asked them to
analyze the text. After analyzing the text, they wrote which one
for example was describing job, which sentences showed it, and
which tenses used in the text. They concluded it themselves“ (2-
V25-1-ET-T-SA).
She also made the teaching materials by her own and asked agreement
from her superior. By doing this she had self-actualized herself because she had
shown her potential as an English teacher and got trust from the head of the
department.
“So when I taught English 2 class which topic was Job Hunting, it
was the first time I taught Job Hunting. But when I got that
chance from Mr. Supar, he said “Ms. Vera for English class 1,2,3,
I trust you to make them accordingly”. I, at that time made a
bridge, “How if it is like this Sir”. Mr Supar at that time agreed
with me. I felt happy at that time” (2-V28-1-ET-T-SA).
Furthermore, she wanted to give her students more related topics which could
fulfil her students’ need as accounting students at that time. By giving specific
topic but still in line with the syllabus from faculty shows that she wanted to show
her capability in making the teaching materials and her own syllabus. She had
self-actualized herself.
“I just wanted to make the General English into more specific.
Actually we talked about the same thing. Daily routines, but not
my daily routines as a student for example” (3-V21-2-ET-T-SA).
In other side, Ms. Widi was also tried to dig out her students potentials by asking
her students to go in front of the class to talked about their products, which in the
previous meeting she had told them to make very simple products like recycling
products. She had been succeded in digging out her students potentials because
not only her student were able to speak english in front of the class presenting
their product but also because they became so creative in presenting their
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
96
enviromental friendly products. By being able to dig out her students’ potential
and creativity shows that she as able to dig out her own potential as an English
teacher who was able to guide her students in learning English well. It means she
had herself self-actualized.
“I also asked my students to go in front of the class to talked
about their products because the very..in the very previous
meeting I told them to make very simple products like recycling
so one week after that they came to class bringing their own
products in a..quite green product, very inspiring” (1-W03-1-ET-
T-SA).
Furthermore she had self-actualized herself when her students appreciated
her effort in guiding her students to perform mini drama in English. Her students
feeling of happiness, their willingness and ability to perform the mini drama in
English shows that she was able to dig out her students’ potentials. This also
shows her capability of digging out her own potentials as an English teacher.
“They had like little mermaid but with their own version. It’s
really interesting. And all of the students were really really eager
to do so and they were really happy and they told me: Oh miss to
be honest this is the first time for us to.. you know like perform
the drama, mini play but we called mini play in English that’s the
very first experience” (1-W03-1-ET-T-SA).
Being able to digging out her students potentials shows that Ms. Widi also had
dug out her own potentials in teaching English through mini drama. It means that
she had self-actualized herself.
Her self-actualization also showed in her way of managing the class. She
could use English as the bridge to bring her students local values and local colors
into the classroom through the presentations which were delivered in English. By
letting the students to bring their local tales in the class using English, she dug up
her students potentials in speaking skills and therefore she self-actualized herself.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
97
“So really they came to class, bringing with them their own local
values and local colors. But they express everything in English. So
I guess in my class, English, at that time really becoming the
bridge” (1-W11-1-ET-T-SA).
It means she was capable of digging out her students potentials so that they could
perform well in English. By digging out her students potentials she had self-
actualized herself.
From both experiences shows that both of the teachers had themselves self-
actualized. It is in line with what Koltko-Rivera (2006: 303) stated that self-
actualization is to seek fulfilment of a personal potential. Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera
had also reached self-transcendence level. It is in line with what Maslow said as
cited by Venter (2012) that self-transcendence is a person’s ability to obtain a
unitive consciousness with other humans (1964: 1968). The transcended person is
therefore able to view the world and his or her purpose in the world in relation to
other human beings on a more global scale and is aware that they can have an
impact, not just within their own geographical boundaries or culture, but on the
whole world” (Venter,2012: 67).
It means that Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera were able to go beyond themselves,
search their life values, and then go further the boundaries to give impact of their
life to the world. Both of the teachers had got their fullest potentials therefore they
could reach the self-transcendence needs since they knew their own potentials and
spreaded the values of life through their potentials across boundaries. At the end,
their life becomes really useful to the development of human being since they had
reached their highest needs and also helped other people to achieve their own self-
transcendence needs.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
98
5. Struggle
Starting the class was important moment for the teachers because it is the first
impression for the students about the class. Therefore Ms. Vera liked it. But she
had to struggle to climb the stairs to teach English on the fourth floor without
taking a lift at that time.
“It was on the fourth floor but I don’t know, I forgot the name of
the room, but on the fourth floor, that is in the meeting room. it’s
a very big room. Usually they used it for the meeting. but the next
semester I begged to the administrator because it’s just too far. I
didn’t have the card to go by lift. and then they moved the class in
two room 52 and 53. That was on the second floor. and also in
semester 3, room 52 and room 51” (3-V14-2-ET-T-ST).
She had to teach last session class which lasted from 2.30. p.m. to 5.00 p.m.
“I taught on the fourth floor. and the fourth floor is kind of far.
and then me as..you know what do you called it part time teacher,
I did not have my card to go through the lift so it’s kind of hard
for me and that time was around 2.30 or 2 p.m. because I
remember I finish around 5. So it was the last session. okay may
be you can check the schedule later in Sanata Dharma. The last
session for the class. may be 2 or 2.30 until 5 or 5.10 or
something.. yeah 5.10.” (3-V15-2-ET-T-ST).
These struggles shows her determination as a teacher which should be
appreciated. Furthermore, her struggle as a determined teacher could be seen in
her struggle of teaching 50 students in a big and no air conditioner room.
“But I really used the microphone but I used the microphone in
my first experience not because of the students, not because of the
number of students but because of the room. The room was not
wide but it’s a kind of long room. It’s not really convinient, and
without air conditioner. So actually for my first experience I did
not do too many action in the class. Firstly because it’s hot.
There’s no air conditioner. And then the class was just e..not big
but long. And the students are 50. So the first thing to do is.. OK..
I asked the students to sit at the front row. I always feel that and
no blank space among them so it’s kind of tight sitting” (3-V16-2-
ET-T-ST).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
99
She also had to struggle in managing a big class. She struggled to manage her
class well by creating disguise activities in the classroom so that the students
forget that the room was hot at that time.
The class will be hotter and they experienced that. The class was
just hotter and hotter but I try to like make a kind of disguise
activity so that we forget about the situation. Just like games. And
you know I like making jokes too. I really love making jokes so
whenever the students feel like tired or what, usually I started
with the games. Small games like it’s a very simple one so for
example counting games one, two, three, boom. You know that
games? just that, counting game. They are accounting students.
And then after that grouping . Whenever it did in a group of
course the students would be very busy, they forgot the hot day,
in the hot situation like that. (3-V16-2-ET-T-ST).
While for Ms. Widi, she was challenged to teach a big class. Eventhough
at first she felt it was tiring but in the end she could prove that she could do it.
“I had to manage the very big class by myself and I found like it
was too overwhelming for me. You know like having quite you
know a lot of students ..all the students at that time they came from
the same batch” (1-W03-1-ET-T-ST).
It shows her determination as an English teacher who struggled to dig out her own
potential as an English teacher and defeated her feeling of unwillingness.
Her struggle in teaching English to the accounting department students
was also shown when she had a class which was started at 2 p.m. and ended at
5p.m. She felt it was a really really long and tiring class and what made it worse
was that after that class, English class, the students still had more class up to 8
p.m. So it was really challenging thing for her.
“So the class started from 2 up to 5. It was really really long and
tiring and what made it worse is that after that class, English
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
100
class, still they had more class after that up to 8 p.m. so yes..
really it’s really challenging thing for me” (1-W04-1-ET-T-ST).
Her struggle in teaching English to the accounting department students
was also shown when she felt like it was hard to have a lot of students especially
all the students at that time came from the same batch.
“I had to manage the very big class by myself and I found like it
was too overwhelming for me. You know like having quite you
know a lot of students ..all the students at that time they came
from the same batch”(1-W03-1-ET-T-ST).
But then she struggled and encouraged herself and her teaching assisstants to
always bring their very best to class, how to make the class funnier and more
interesting. She meant they were there to create a kind of medium, a place so that
the students were happy studying English with them
“So I encouraged myself and also my teaching assisstants to always
bring our very best to class, how to make the class funnier in more
interesting ..I mean..we were there to create a kind of medium , a
place, a medium so that they were so happy studying English with
us” (1-W04-1-ET-T-ST).
Ms. Widi also struggled to encourage her student to speak more in her class.
She struggled to make the students understand certain vocabularies and asked
them to read and discussed in a group for managing her students activity.
“So we developed their understanding first on certain
vocabularies. Then after that we asked them to read but yaa..after
that they discussed it with a friend for example. So we had like a
group work” (1-W05-1-ET-T-ST).
She also struggled for the weak students to get longer time to speak in
front of the class.
“O ya. So I at that time..My assisstants and I, We were discussing
first. we had a quite long discussion, concerning the “weak
students”. I really..fortunate that I was only very few weak
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
101
students but still we to address them right so I at that time after
we had a quite long discussion then we decided to give the weak
students more opportunity to speak in front of the class and we
gave them longer time“ (1-W06-1-ET-T-ST).
It shows that she believed that by giving more time to the weak students to speak
in front of the class, the students would speak more and learned to be confident. It
means that Ms. Widi had struggled for her students to be able to learn English
especially in acquiring the speaking skills.
There were a lot of weak students in Ms. Vera’s class at that time. So she
struggled for her weak students in order to be able to speak up their minds in
English by opening additional class for the first time for free especially for her
weak students. In that class she let them playing games that made them speaking.
“Unfortunately, in my previous class I had a lot of weak students.
So it was a special time, my first time, during my experience of
teaching in Sanata Dharma university to give additional lesson to
my students, especially for my weak students. It was free. In this
class I only let them playing games as many as they wanted to
play in order for them to be confident in speaking” (2-V27-1-ET-
T-ST).
It is in line with Mickan (2013: 54) who said that the aim of classroom
activities is for students to experience and observe language in action. Teaching
focuses on development of students’ abilities to make meanings.
Both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera struggled to create funny and interesting
interaction during the lesson. They thought that the atmosphere helped the
students got motivation for learning English. Here both of them applied the
affective filter hypothesis as suggested by Krashen as cited by Richard and
Rodgers ( 1986: p.133 ). Krashen sees the learner’s emotional state or attitude as
an adjustable filter that freely passes, impedes, or blocks input necessary to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
102
acquisition. He identified that there are three kinds of affective that influence
second language acquisition: firstly, he said that learners with high motivation
generally do better. Secondly, learners with self-confidence and a good self-
image tend to be more succesfull. Thirdly, low personal anxiety and low
classroom anxiety are more conducive to second language acquisition. Being
aware of the importance of this method, both of the teachers applied it in their
classroom.
6. Equity
Both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera treated their students equally. Eventhough not
all of their students were smart students they gave their students opportunity to
practice their English, to speak up in front of the class, to dig out their potential.
Although for the weak students they gave more attention and longer time but in
fact they tried to do their best to treat them equally.
Ms. Widi asked her smart students to be in one group with weak students
so that their weak students would improve together by learning and help each
other. Ms. Widi and her assistants also encouraged the weak students to be
equally participated in the class activities. They always had a groupwork for the
activity in the classroom so the students were divided into different groupworks so
the weak students usually came together or sat together with students with quite
good English proficiency. The activity was like mingling activity. So in dealing
with those weak students, she managed to make them mingle with the students
with quite high sense of English proficiency.
“And also we encourage them to..because we always had a
groupwork so we divided into different groupworks so they
usually came together or sat together with students with quite
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
103
good English proficiency so..like minggling. So dealing with
those students, those kind of students so I managed to make them
mingle with students with quite high sense of English
proficiency” (1-W06-1-ET-T-EQ).
Ms. Vera believed that she should treated her students as adults who could
share their opinion and ideas. She also did not differentiate the students to the
smart ones and the weak ones. She let them to mingle and participate together in
every activity. It was her effort to treat them equally. She always gave a kind of
equal portion for the practice. She appointed the weak students to be the leader or
to lead the class. She said “ I always gave a kind of equal portion for the practice.
And I appointed them to be the leader or to lead the class” (3-V26-2-ET-T-EQ).
By doing this she wanted to give equal chances to the weak students to speak up
in front of the class. She also did not differentiate the students to the smart ones
and the weak ones. She let them to mingle and participate together in every
activity. It was her effort to treat them equally.
“That’s all. So I would not differentiate the smart students in
English from the weak ones. I would not make the smart students
become the special ones..No. So I usually let them mingle and
participate in every activity dulu” (2-V27-1-ET-T-EQ).
That was why she asked their opinion and feeling about the lesson that had
just learned in the end of the class.
“Firstly I asked the students to sum up. orally. we sum up together
what we learnt previously. and then after that I asked the students
to figure out what things that they might..they should do in the
next meeting. And they tried to get themselves.. oo.. ya.. we had
to do this one, this one” (3-V24-2-ET-T-EQ).
Their experiences shows that they had treated their weak students and
smart students equally. They worked hard to make their weak students
comprehend the materials like other students. They worked hard to make their
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
104
weak students could keep up with other students. They explored the weak students
and strong students potentials more and more so that they can dig out their best
performance and ability in English.
7. Disappoinment
Although both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera did not have significant difficulties in
teaching English to Accounting students, but they felt disappointed with the
syllabus made by the faculty. Ms. Vera got a syllabus from the faculty for her
English class. She sometimes followed the syllabus given. There was Introduction
topic in the first meeting completed with the copies of handouts for her students.
But she felt a little bit frustrated because of that. She felt burdensome because
according to the syllabus she had to give material and handouts to the students at
their first meeting directly. She did not like giving many copies of handouts to her
students but in the end they were not used by the students. She was a little bit
disappointed because of that. She agreed with Mr. Supar that at the beginning of
semester at the first meeting the teacher should focus on the introduction of
syllabus and the class foundations or rules.
“I sometimes followed the syllabus given by the faculty. There
was Introduction topic in the first meeting completed with the
copies of handouts for her students. But I felt a little bit...
frustrated because I felt burdensome because I should directly
give the material to the students at their first meeting. I did not
like giving many copies of handouts to my students but in the end
they were not used at all by the students. I was a little bit
disappointed because of that. I agreed with Mr. Supar that at the
beginning of semester, at the first meeting the teacher should
focus on the introduction of syllabus and the class foundations or
rules “ (2-V2-1-ET-T-DIS).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
105
She did it because she did not really like using the book from the
university. She thought the book from the university just copy paste from other
books and the authors just re-arranged the units.
“ Became the point where I did not like teaching. If it used one
book at once it would be Okay but the book made by the faculty
was abook which took another book to be copy paste and be
rearranged. Well it was a quite good effort though..the original
book had 20 units but it took only 14 unit” (2-V25-1-ET-T-DIS).
Ms. Widi also thought that the syllabus did not represent the students’
need. Therefore she made modification here and there so that the the textbook
could be used in their class.
“Okay. We got the textbook actually. But again the textbook was
you know like quite yaa.. it needed modification here and there
and additional information...additional materials” (1-W05-1-ET-
T-DIS).
She also felt disappointed with her first class. Her first class was not that
challenging in term of materials because it was really TOEFL. TOEFL had to
deal with listening, structure and reading.
“My first class was not that challenging I mean in term of
materials because it’s really TOEFL. TOEFL had to deal with
..you know..like listening, structure and reading” (1-W03-1-ET-T-
DIS)
She knew that the textbook which topics were too general, could not fulfil the
needs of accounting department students. Because the students were accounting
students they actually needed English for Specific Purposes. They needed English
which was related to business and economics. However the textbook and the
syllabus was made too general so that it was not effective and efficient for digging
out the students’ potentials. She thought that the textbook was not really
appropriate for the students of the accounting department.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
106
This feeling of disappointment shows that both of the teachers have one of
lived experience aspect namely feeling. Feeling is a state which is in its entirety in
every moment of time as long as it endures (Pierce, 2004). When a person wants
to know someone’s feeling she/he usually uses feeling questions such as : “ How
do you feel about that?”. The question needs adjective responses expressing
feelings such as: anxious, happy, afraid, confident, and so on (Patton, 2002).
8. Feeling Proud of the Students
Instead of their weak students, both Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera felt proud of their
students. Ms. Widi had never thought that her students could be so creative
despite their lack of English skills. She never thought that her students could have
great ideas about used products and were able to presented them using English in
fron of the class. She also felt proud because her students could play play
performance using English eventhough they were not students from English
department.
“How can a bottle just like mineral bottle suddenly became like
you know pencil case, cosmetic case. To me..it’s really
interesting. In how could like newspaper..used newspaper
suddenly became like bracelet or rings something like that..Oh my
God ..it’s pretty interesting I mean to be honest it was surprising
in a..it was really great that they came up with quite different
ideas. And this class was also great in term of their performance
because I asked them to play play performance so they performed
legends or fables, short stories based on their understanding so I
asked them to ”redifined” again what is meant by short stories,
love stories and also legends and also say for example like you
know European stories like Romeo and Juliet or like Hamlet“ (1-
W03-1-ET-T-FPS).
Ms. Widi also felt proud of her students at that time because they were
really eager to learn, to study English and moreover, they brought with them the
highest spirit to the class eventhough it was 3 credits class.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
107
“But most I would say that the students in that class were mostly
great. They speak English really well. Because like 80% of them
got an A or B. Yes..not because I was too easy to give the
mark..no..but because they’re able to show the best performance
in a..they really eager to learn to study and moreover ..they
brought with them the highest spirit to the class so because it
was 3 credits. Can you imagine 3 credits” (1-W04-1-ET-T-FPS).
While Ms. Vera felt proud of her students because they were so
cooperative and enthusiastic in her class eventhough some of them were so weak
in English. She said that they also had a high siprit in learning English.
Furthermore she said that her students were on time to the class and did not like
playing with their mobile phones.
“I’m OK. The students were cooperative and they were so
enthusiastic to join my class. And they were really eager to learn
in my class and they had a very high spirit. I had never found my
students were late or like to nod or put the head on the table or
tried to play with their phone. I had never found that. So I just
called my class was so amazing. So I found..Ok maybe problem
like the audio did not work, things like that. But generally for the
class for the learning teaching process was just fine. The students
always did the homework.They helped one another. Sometimes I
asked the students to lead the class and they did it very well. And
they came to the class on time. No significant problem was in the
class. I was very proud of them. Really “(3-V23-2-ET-T-FPS).
She felt proud because her students respected her by giving her their attention and
spirit of learning English. She was proud because the students had willingness to
help each other as she meant to be.
From the teachers experiences above shows that they had feeling towards
their students. Feeling is a state which is in its entirety in every moment of time as
long as it endures (Pierce, 2004). When a person wants to know someone’s
feeling she/he usually uses feeling questions such as : “ How do you feel about
that?”. The question needs adjective responses expressing feelings such as:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
108
anxious, happy, afraid, confident, and so on (Patton, 2002). Feeling proud of the
students indicated that both of the teachers had themselves self-actualized because
they thought that they had succeeded in digging out their students’ potentials. For
them, teaching English was not merely transferring their knowledge to their
students but also how to make the students be able to show the results of their
learning process.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
109
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION, RECOMMENDATION
In this final chapter, research result, implication, and suggestions were
presented one by one. The research results sum up the things done in the study
and its findings. The implications elaborate the benefits of the study for English
education related to the findings. The last, the suggestions elaborate the ideas to
conduct further research.
A. CONCLUSION
This research aims to answer the research question: “What is the meaning
of teaching English in the accounting department to the teachers?” The answer of
this question was autonomy, awareness, understanding/emphaty, struggle, self-
actualization, equity, disappoinment, and feeling proud of the students.
The meanings of teaching English to the accounting department students
were found out from the description of lived experience which was narrated based
on the transcription. From the description,the researcher made an interpretation
and it could be concluded that each participant had shared experiences and
individual experiences.
The final conclusion of this research was human being went beyond the
empirical ones in order to find the true meaning of their experience. The teachers
were transcendentally driven to teach English which fulfiled students’ need. In
both of the teachers, Ms. Widi and Ms. Vera’s lived experiences, teaching English
to the accounting deparment students was not the same with teaching english to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
110
students from other departments because they had different needs. From their
experiences, each participant had unique experiences in which they taught English
to the accounting department students according to their deepest understanding of
experience as their individual experience. However, they had universal experience
as the shared experience.
B. IMPLICATIONS
This study had implication for all components in education related to the
English teaching in the accounting department. Theoretically, the study added
theory about teaching English in general and teaching English to the accounting
department students in particular. By seeing the experience by the teachers, there
might be better ways in teaching English in the context of teaching English to the
accounting department students. This study may add and complete the existing
theory which is based on the practice in the real field.
Scientifically, this study will give contribution as the lived experience
described and interpreted in building better understanding of the phenomena of
teaching English to accounting department students. This understanding will
change teachers’ beliefs, intentions, feelings and actions. The study will also be
able to be used as the reference and source of information for those who are
involved in educational field of English teaching to accounting department
students.
Practically for teachers who teach in the similar field, they can learn the
lived experience in teaching English in the accounting department from this study.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
111
They will probably share the similar experience and reflect to the experience
shared in this study.
C. RECOMMENDATION
Teaching English to the accounting department students needs more
concern from those who are involved in the program, like the department,
language institution, and teachers. The students will be the main focus of the
program besides the material. Therefore, the phenomena open the challenge for
researchers to discover more important and significant findings on the issue.
Accordingly, I will suggest some points for the researchers who want to
conduct further study related to the phenomena. First, the university must pay
more attention to the English class in accounting department students. The
syllabus and the textbook must be changed according to the accounting
department students’ need because each department in university has different
needs. Second, the number of the students in one class of English class must be
reduced to small classes because big classes were not effective and efficient to
learn English.
Third, the researchers are suggested to conduct a study on the phenomena
with the similar participants, teachers with different topic. The researchers can
have more detail topic related to the teacher or the teaching techniques by the
teacher, for example the material collection, the testing, the grading, or others.
Fourth, the researchers can conduct a study with similar participants and
similar topic using different phenomenological approach or method. The example
is grounded theory, case study, or others.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
112
The last, I suggest the researcher to conduct a study with different
participant, for example the students. The lived experience theme can be used
with different topic. The students are important to be noticed and they have their
experience which can be used as reflection for teachers, department, government,
and other parties involved.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
113
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agee, J.M. (1996). “I was Kind of Hoping for a Woman”: Issues of Lived
Experience in the Pre-service Cooperating Teacher Relationship. English
Education. Vol.28, No.4. pp.280-302. New York: National Council of
Teachers of English
Alvesson, M & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive Methodology. New Vistas for
Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Inc.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning.
Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Boyd, F.A. (1991). Business English and the Case Method: Reassessment.
TESOL Quarterly, Vol.25, No.4. pp. 729-734. Teachers of English to
Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL)
Bradley, B. (2002). Psychology and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education
(5th
ed). London and New York: Routledge Falmer
Cresswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and research Design: Choosing
Among Five Approach (2nd
ed). London: SAGE Publication,Inc.
Cresswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: fourth edition. Boston:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Cronbach, L.J. (1963). Educational Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace &
World Inc.
Cresswell, J.W. (2002). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publication,Inc.
Dale, E., & O’Rourke, J.(1971). Techniques of Teaching Vocabulary. London:
The Benjamin/ Cunnings Publishing Company.
Dosen-dosen Program Studi Akuntansi Universitas Sanata Dharma. ( 2014).
Panduan Program Studi Akuntansi. 2nd edition. Eds. YP. Supardiyono, Fr.
Reni Retno Anggraini, and FA. Joko Siswanto. Yogyakarta: Program Studi
Akuntansi Universitas Sanata Dharma
Ellis, E.M. (2012). Language awareness and its Relevance to TESL. University of
Sydney Papers in TESOL 7 (1-23) Retrieved from on
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
114
http://faculty.edfac.usyd.edu.au/projects/usp_in_tesol/pdf/volume07/Articl
e01.pdf on 4th October 2016.
Heylighen, F. (1992). A Cognitive Systemic Reconstruction of Maslow’s Theory
of Self Actualization. Behavioral Science, Vol. 37, 1992. Retrieved from
http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/papers/maslow.pdf, accessed on November 12th,
2015
Hill, C.E. (2012). Consensual Qualitative Research: A Practical Resource For
Investigating Social Science Phenomena. Washington DC: American
Psychological Association
Holiday.A. (2002). Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. California: SAGE
Publication,Inc.
InternationalStudent.com. (2016) What is Accounting. Florida: Envisage
International Corporation. Retrieved from
http://www.internationalstudent.com/study-accounting/what-is-
accounting/,on November 11th
, 2016
Kirk, J. (2004). The Lived Experiences of Women Teachers in Karachi.
Comparative Education Review. Vol.48, No.4, Special Issue on Global
Trends in Comparative Research on Gender and Education. Guest Eds:
N’Dri Assie-Lumumba and Margaret Sutton. 374-395. The University of
Chicago Press. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/423360 , on April 13th
, 2015
Koltko, R. (2006). Rediscovering the Later Version of Maslow’s Hierarchy of
Needs: Self-Transcendence and Opportunities for Theory, Research, and
Unification. Review of General Psychology Vol. 10, No.4, 302-317.
Retrieved from
http://academic.udayton.edu/jackbauer/Readings%20595/Koltko-
Rivera%2006%20trans%20self-act%20copy.pdf, accessed on November
15th
,2015
Levin, J., & Steele, L. (2005). The Transcendent Experience: Conceptual,
Theoretical, Epidemiologic Perspective. Explore 1(2) 89-101. Retrieved
from http://www.baylorisr.org/wp-content/uploads/levin_transcendent.pdf
on March 16th, 2016
Lier, L.V. (2013). Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness,
Autonomy, Authenticity. New York: Routledge
Lonergan, B.J.F. (1958). A Study of Human Understanding. New York: Harper
and Row Publishers
Marleku, A. (n.d). Representation-the Production of Meaning Through
Languange. Retrieved from
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
115
https://www.academia.edu//1103465/Representation_-
_the_production_of_meaning_through_language on March 11th, 2016
Maslow, A.H. (1979). The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. Middlesex:
Penguin Books.
Merleau Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
Mickan, P. (2013). Language Curriculum Design and Socialisation. Bristol:
Multilingual Matters.
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd
Edition).
Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic Research: Design, Methodology, and
Application. California: SAGE Publication.
Ngan, N.T.C. (2011). Content-based Instruction in the Teaching of English for
Accounting at Vietnamese College of Finance and Customs. English
Language Teaching. Vol.4 Retrieved from:
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/11879/8339 on
3rd
October 2016
Pajaras, M. F. (1992). Teachers Belief and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a
Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research. Vol. 62, pp. 307-332
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd
ed).
London: SAGE Publications Inc.
Pierce, C.S. (2004). Phenomenology: Definition of Feeling. The Collected Papers
Vol. 1, Principles of Philosophy. Retrieved from
http://www.textlog.de/4298.html accessed on December 11th
, 2015
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and Self-regulated Learning
components of Classroom Academic performance: Jounal of Educational
Psychology. Vol. 82, pp. 33-50
Richards, J.C, & Theodore, S.R. (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language
Teaching. Edinburg: Cambridge University Press
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge
University Press
Suyadi. (2016). English for Specific Purposes for Accounting Students.
International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences.
Vol.3, Issue 2. Retrieved from
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
116
http://www.ijires.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/public
ations/IJIRES_584_FINAL.pdf on 29th
September 2016
Weggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment. San Fransisco: Joosey-Bass Publisher
Wilis, P. (2001). The “Things Themselves” in Phenomenology. Indo-Pacific
Journal of Phenomenology. Vol.1, pp. 1-14
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an
Action Sensitive Pedagogy. New York: State University of New York
Press.
Venter, H.J. (2012). Maslow’s Self Trancendence: How It Can Enrich
Organization Culture and Leadership. International Journal of Business,
Humanities and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 7, December 2012. Retrieved
from
http://www.ijbhtnet.com/jounals/Vol_2_No_7_December_2012/7.pdf,
accessed on November 12th
, 2015.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
117
APPENDICES
Appendix 1. The Transcript of Ms. Widi’s In-depth Interview
Name: Widi (Pseudo name)
Location: Ms. Widi’s room. English Letters Department. Sanata Dharma
University
Day/Date: Thursday/ 31st March 2016
Time: 14.00-15.00 WIB
Role Verbatim Coding
R01 When did you start teaching in accounting
department?
W01 Actually I start it quite..hold on..Four years ago but I
just taught .. like one class.But then I stopped because
I was pretty busy in this department. And I was
assigned to teach again last semester. It’s quite a big
class. Woww
R02 How many students at that time?
W02 My very first class it was like 45 up to 50 students.
But in my last semester class it was about fif..fifty..45
up to 50 students.
R03 And what did you do then?
W03 Well..to be honest it’s pretty hard to manage a big
class with a quite a lot of students in your class but I
managed by having three assisstants. Three teaching
assisstants. All of them are actually my students in
English letters depatment. So I don’t think that it’s
really hard compared to previous experience because
in my previous teaching experience I was just alone
there without any teaching assistant at all.
I had to manage the very big class by myself and I
found like it was too overwhelming for me. You know
like having quite you know a lot of students ..all the
students at that time they came from the same batch
1-W03-1-ET-T-
ST
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
118
so ..anyway the class I mean the two classes they’re
all overal fantastic. Why I said so because students
from accounting department I would say that they are
great eventhough they realized that they need English
not just for daily communication but also they needed
it because some books also written in English so it is
pretty understandable that they try their very best so
study. In my previous class I would call it so, the
focus was on TOEFL because it almost TOEFL like
so I took the materials from TOEFL book so the focus
really different but in my second class, last semester
the focus was on the English for really for
communication. So these students were encouraged
to speak, to express their opinions in the topics vary
from quite..ya..quite interesting topics to cover
because those topics are quite current topics so for
example like we talked about green life, about global
warming and also about culture, tradition. Say for
example we also talked about legends, stories..stories
from their own homeland for example so..it’s pretty
intereresting any way. You know about sports and
also about job application so it’s really ESP in my
opinion any way. And I...to me..oh well I would like
to say that my second class is more interesting in
terms of their topics and coverage. My first class was
not that challenging I mean in term of materials
because it’s really TOEFL. TOEFL had to deal with
..you know..like listening, structure and reading. But
in the second class..more than that. I mean more than
that because in speaking they had to express their
opinions on a certain thing, on a certain topic and
they needed to speak up in even “I could.. you know
1-W03-1-ET-T-
AW
1-W03-1-ET-T-
DIS
1-W03-1-ET-E-
AU
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
119
like.. quite modified my class, my materials”. Say for
example in a topic called global warming, green life.
I also asked my students to go in front of the class to
talked about their products because the very in the
very previous meeting I told them to make very
simple products like recycling so one week after that
they came to class bringing their own products in
a..quite green product, very inspiring. How can a
bottle just like mineral bottle suddenly became like
you know pencil case, cosmetic case. To me..it’s
really interesting. In how could like newspaper..used
newspaper suddenly became like bracelet or rings
something like that..Oh my God ..it’s pretty
interesting I mean to be honest it was surprising in
a..it was really great that they came up with quite
different ideas. And this class was also great in term
of their performance because I asked them to play
play performance so they performed legends or
fables, short stories based on their understanding so I
asked them to ”redifined” again what is meant by
short stories, love stories and also legends and also
say for example like you know European stories like
Romeo and Juliet or like Hamlet. But I would like
them to really redifined what is meant by Romeo and
Juliet and if it is possible they had to create their own
version so first they needed to understand first what is
meant by Romeo and Juliet and how they observe
Romeo and Juliet for example. And they also have
like Sampek EngTay. They had like little mermaid
but with their own version. It’s really interesting .
And all of the students were really really eager to do
so and they were really happy and they told me: Oh
1-W03-1-PFT-
E-SA
1-W03-1-ET-T-
FPS
1-W03-1-ET-T-
SA
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
120
miss to be honest this is the first time for us to.. you
know like perform the drama, mini play but we called
mini play in English that’s the very first experience.
R04 So did you make your own syllabus or did you follow
the sylabus from the university?
W04 Well actually it’s a kind of team teaching so there’s
already syllabus from the university. Anyway as a
lecturer as a teacher we..I myself did that. I modified
here and there..and again it depends on the ..on my
need analysis. I needed to know my class, my students
from the very first meeting. So in the very first
meeting, I really observed at that time what’s going
on with my class, what’s going on with my students,
what’s going on with the interaction, the
communication, and also I..because it’s more on
speaking yaa as a teacher we easily found out
probably a kind of different or different in ability. But
most I would say that the students in that class were
mostly great. They speak English really well.
Because like 80% of them got an A or B. Yes..not
because I was too easy to give the mark..no..but
because they’re able to show the best performance in
a..they really eager to learn to study and moreover
..they brought with them the highest spirit to the class
so because it was 3 credits. Can you imagine 3
credits. So the class started from 2 up to 5. It was
really really long and tiring and what made it worse
is that after that class, English class, still they had
more class after that up to 8 p.m. so yes.. really it’s
really challenging thing for me. So I encouraged
myself and also my teaching assisstants to always
bring our very best to class, how to make the class
1-W04-1-ET-E-
AU
1-W04-1-ET-T-
AW
1-W04-1-ET-T-
FPS
1-W04-1-ET-T-
ST
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
121
funnier in more interesting ..I mean..we were there to
create a kind of medium , a place, a medium so that
they were so happy studying English with us. I mean
no matter what their background at that time was that
the most important thing is that... not just..yeah I
know syllabus is important. That’s the guidance. But
it doesn’t mean that we cannot modify it. We can
modifiy it. Again it depens on the current situations.
It depends on how we believe. It depends on our
belief because again sylabus is syllabus. But I do
believe that by having such kind of classroom
management or classroom activities then my
classroom at that time was much more interesting.
1-W04-1-ET-E-
AU
R05 And then how did you prepare the materials for
them?
W05 Okay. We got the textbook actually. But again the
textbook was you know like quite yaa.. it needed
modification here and there and additional
information...additional materials. In a..but overall
we still stick to the syllabus and also the textbook but
we modified or added by having more activities. So
we divided in two, say for example the very first one
is the introduction, usually we had ice breaking.
ya...ya.. come on that’s really mainstream . That’s
teacher always do right. and The second one we did
like I think more funny, interesting activities. It’s like
reading but reading in very interesting way. So we
developed their understanding first on certain
vocabularies. Then after that we asked them to read
but yaa..after that they discussed it with a friend for
example. So we had like a group work.
1-W05-1-ET-T-
DIS
1-W05-1-ET-E-
AU
1-W05-1-ET-T-
ST
R06 And then how did you deal with the “weak students”?
W06 O ya. So I at that time..My assisstants and I, We were
discussing first. we had a quite long discussion,
concerning the “weak students”. I really..fortunate
that I was only very few weak students but still we to
1-W06-1-ET-T-
ST
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
122
address them right so I at that time after we had a
quite long discussion then we decided to give the
weak students more opportunity to speak in front of
the class and we gave them longer time. Say for
example because lot of students and of course we
needed to limit the time. If not then we would be
running out of time right. So at that time we gave
more portion to the weak students because while
speaking they needed like pause, break. Their
speaking probably, their fluency was not that high so
they needed time to think about vocabularies
probably, to think about grammar probably so yes we
decided to give them more portion, more time. So the
time limitation..yes, it was applicable but not to that
weak students so still we gave them time. And also we
encourage them to..because we always had a
groupwork so we divided into different groupworks
so they usually came together or sat together with
students with quite good English proficiency so..like
minggling. So dealing with those students, those kind
of students so I managed to make them mingle with
students with quite high sense of English proficiency.
1-W06-1-ET-T-
EM
1-W06-1-ET-T-
EQ
R07 So did you give them a handout or homework later
on?
W07 Yes. But only for writing. Because I did believe at
that time I was not a successful teacher if I gave them
more burden. To me, homework could be a burden
but it could be not a burden. So my belief at that time
that I wish only giving them homework for the writing
skills but not for other skills. So we really strictly
managed the time and also the allocation of the time.
1-W07-1-ET-T-
EM
R08 And then about the assessment. How did you give
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
123
assessment to your students?
W08 Okay. For the writing, yes. We had a rubric for the
assessment. So for the writing we had of course
grammar, and then we have coherence just like what
we were in our studying of faculty. So for the
speaking it’s like fluency and soon so I already gave
my assisstant the rubric.
1-W08-1-ET-T-
AW
R09 Back to the students again. Did you think..at that
time, what kind of students. I mean, they were in the
first or second semester?
W0 Very first semester.
R10 And about their English at that time? Are they
advance students or intermediate students?
W10 As I mention earlier, most of them were great in
English but few of them were not at all. So I could
not defined or I could not classify that they were pre-
intermediate or intermediate. But I would say that
most of them already in intermediate level but,
however, few of them, I would say still in very
beginning of level.
R11 So did you put a target at that time?
W11 Not. Not. Probably I don’t know how to define a
target. Probably..hold on. What is meant by target?
Probably just a..as long as they could speak,
understood other people’s discussion, other people’s
utterances. I mean For the students who fell into.. say
the inter level for example, that’s actually my focus.
So I did that by ...as I told you earlier by asking them
to mingle. The target actually I wanted them to be
able to express their opinions. The very basic level
and also to speak up. Because the topic also ..as I
mention earlier, ranging from things which are very
Intention
1-W11-1-ET-T-
ST
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
124
famous and also..from global warming and soon until
things which are really basic. It’s like for example
tales, legends, and so on. To me, tales are very basic.
They become my students’ foundation because those
tales will defined who my students are. Because those
coming from Medan for example, they probably do
not know Nyi Roro Kidul, for example. So really they
came to class, bringing with them their own local
values and local colors. But they expressed
everything in English. So I guess in my class, English,
at that time really becoming the bridge.
1-W11-1-ET-T-
SA
R12 So how did you make the bridge. How did you deal
with the difficulty?
W12 difficulty of?
R13 Difficulty of teaching, students, materials.
W13 Okay. Not really that hard. Probably because I bought
wonder book assisstance. So my assisstants, my three
assisstants, they were really trained well and to be
honest all of them are outstanding students in this
department so I don’t feel at that time I faced
difficulties or hard time, no. Just how to make those
students at the beginning really could keep up with
other students.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
125
Appendix 2. The Transcript of Ms. Vera’s First In-depth Interview
Name: Vera (Pseudo name)
Day/Date: Friday/ March 18,2016
Time: 13.30-14.30 WIB
Place: Psychology Faculty, Gajahmada University
Role Verbatim Coding
R1 I want you to look back at your past
experience. Pengalaman miss mengajar di
akuntansi yang paling berkesan itu kapan?
V1 yang paling berkesan yang berhubungan
dengan pengajaran?
R2 Iya
V2 Sebenarnya gini..di setiap meeting itu awal
semester itu adalah hal yang pertama paling
berkesan kemudian nanti akhir semester itu
. Tapi kalau akhir semester itu biasanya kita
sudah hectic dengan ini ya..apa itu
namanya..test. Tapi..gini..di titik akhir
semester adalah di waktu dimana kita sudah
sangat mengerti satu sama lain, sudah akrab
banget, sudah kayak saling butuh kemudian
anak itu merasa yang nyaman terus yah kok
udah selesai ya kadang nggak kerasa disitu
mereka ngungkapin, terus kadang-kadang
mereka kasih feedback ke saya tertulis
karena tidak ada di kampus. Di kampus itu
kan modelnya dengan excel sampling itu.
Aku nggak tau yang ditulis disitu apa,
maksudnya pasti berbeda dengan ketika
mereka menulis langsung. langsung di tag
ke saya saat itu juga. Itu berkesan untuk
building my own future, for the next
semester. Dan aku jadi mengerti mereka tu
ternyata nyaman saya ajar. Terus itu untuk
pelajaran umum ya miss. Terus kalo
misalnya awal semester itu jauh lebih
berkesan sih karena aku menerapkan sistem
ya namanya education aku underline banget
kata pengajaran itu bukan hanya teaching
tapi education in the sense of mendidik. Ya
kalo misalnya dapat semester awal semester
satu yang mereka adalah lulusan SMA
mungkin agak sedikit lebih mudah karena
mereka belum punya culture. Ketika
2-V2-1-ET-T-SA
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
126
mereka sudah semester empat itu mereka
udah culture-nya harus dibangun
kembali..mereka udah menjadi anak kuliah.
Ketika masuk kelas dan akan...saya pribadi
akan membentuk suatu culture
tertentu..bekerjanya lebih dobel karena
mereka kan udah punya culture..e..apa ya
misalnya..santai anak kuliah itu, toh telat
boleh. Baju boleh sembarangan. Terus
materinya bahasa Inggris apa sih. Toh
kemarin misalnya Bahasa Inggris 1 nggak
sama saya, ah kemarin tho seperti ini santai.
Jadi pertama kali itu saya sangat suka
karena mereka pasti “menyepelekan”. Tapi
justru di titik poin itu I got my own power.
Jadi ketika orang menyepelekan dalam arti
bukan menyepelekan dosennya entah mata
kuliahnya entah kuliah itu sendiri itu
menjadi tantangan besar dan itu paling
mengesankan. Nanti kan anak-anak kesan
pertama kan kayak gitu. Terus di meeting
pertama itu soalnya meeting yang paling
penting untuk kita sebagai pendidik
memberi pondasi untuk sampai akhir
semester. Jadi misalnya gini miss, kita di
meeting pertama, saya setuju banget dengan
pak Supar itu selalu mengatakan begini
nanti meeting satu gak usah materi dulu lho.
Pak Supar selalu bilang gitu. Meeting satu
itu silabus dulu aja, pemberian silabus.
Kemudian nanti anak-anak diberi segala
sesuatu yang berhubungan dengan
pengajaran kemudian apa yang akan
dilakukan selama satu semester kemudian
apa yang mereka harus..e..apa..tempuh
dalam ..mereka harus menempuh itu dengan
cara bagaimana, rule dikelas dengan saya
bagaimana. Saya setuju banget itu.
Meskipun kadang-kadang kalo dapat
syllabus from the campus biasanya ngikut
mata kuliah yang dari kampus yang
silabusnya udah dibikinin. Itu meeting satu
pasti sudah ada materi Introduction dan
sudah dengan fotokopian terus saya pribadi
pasti merasa a little bit..frustrated..dalam
hal..apa ya..merasa terbebani
karena..waduh udah langsung materi gitu.
Apalagi saya merasa paling tidak suka
2-V2-1-ET-T-DIS
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
127
yang namanya fotokopian, membagikan
handout, yang materinya banyak sekali jadi
nggak kepake itu rasanya agak miris. Jadi
disitu saya akan..bukan karena saya
ngikutin pak Supar tetapi saya setuju
dengan Pak Supar bahwa meeting satu ya
udah kita fokus ke silabus dan full ke...
disitu menanamkan pondasi-pondasi. Jadi
sangat menarik sekali. Ketika saya feel
maka begitu. Jadi tu favorite saya adalah
meeting pertama. Nanti entah dari segi
perkenalannya, entah dari segi apa sih rule
nya. Entah bagaimana cara membuat kind
of shock terapy. Enak anak semester atas
karena kalo anak semeter satu akan lebih
mudah seperti itu.
R3 Dari sekian banyak semester satunya
semester satu mana yang paling berkesan?
di tahun 2016 ini atau di tahun 2015?
V3 Kebetulan di aku ngajarnya itu tahun berapa
saya lupa ya..kalau ngomong tahun saya
sedikit lupa karena 3 atau 4 kali. Tapi bukan
tahun 2016 ini dan bukan tahun 2015
kemarin yang semester baru kemarin.
Karena 3 SKS dan . Mungkin tahun
sebelumnya. 2014 ya. semester 1. itu
mereka yang pertamanya yang seperti apa
ya..kayak bingung.
R4 Miss kan bilang kalo mereka itu kayak
bingung, nyepelein. Nah apa yang miss
lakukan?
V4 Saya itu waktu pertama orangnya tidak suka
banyak omong untuk first impression ya.
saya biasanya masuk ke kelas diam.
R5 Apakah anda ingat berapa jumlah
mahasiswa pada saat itu?
V5 Oh banyak...52
R6 52 orang. And then?
V6 Karena Bahasa Inggris 1.. ya ampun Bahasa
Inggris 52, General English lagi. Mana itu
kan fokusnya ke speaking. Terus gimana
gitu kan. Pastikan yang model
...aduh..inikan ..nanti mereka harus gimana.
Awal-awalny gitu. Duluu..duluu banget.
Dulu kalo mikir ya, ketika memikirkan itu
sepertinya gimana gitu. Tapi ketika sudah
masuk kelas itu saya sih bisa sangat enjoy.
saya bahkan tidak punya yang namanya
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
128
asisten. Bisa mengatur. Ada lah tekniknya
pasti ada gimana caranya. Jadi kalo
misalnya pertama, udah gitu 52, wahh tau
sendiri mahasiswanya udah yang... Justru
dengan diam itu mencari, mencuri
perhatian mereka. Dah diem lalu mereka
akan melihat, mencoba mencari ini siapa.
Kan begitu. Mesti mereka akan punya
komen-komen tertentu seperti yang
kemarin. Pengalaman yang lucu ketika di
managemen dikira asdosnya. Tapi habis itu
saya cut down. Pertama begitu, pasti saya
akan menanyakan yang paling penting
adalah jelas. Nggak langsung introduction.
Saya akan menanyakan hal penting itu
mengapa kamu disini. Dan mereka
akan..study. Study apa? English. Study
what English? Mereka akan menjawab
Bahasa Inggris 1..kinds of funny. Jadi kamu
akan belajar Bahasa Inggris 1. Gampang
tho? Cuma Bahasa Inggris 1. And I wrote
down on the white board: Bahasa Inggris 1.
“Selesai. Pulang”, I said that way. Ya kamu
belajar apa disini. Saya selalu fokus ke
kamu tu tau gak kamu kesini tu untuk apa?
Saya memang tidak suka anak pong pong
blong. Jadi saya tidak mengatakan bodo.
Saya memang tidak fokus ke anak yang
tidak bisa, terus diem miss. Aku gak bisa
nih, kayak gitu. Saya mengatakan kalo anak
itu yang tidak bahasa Inggris ato yang
kurang bisa itu gak masalah tapi dia itu
punya visi misi gitu lho. Kan beda ya.
Nggak bisa yang nggak mau belajar. Dia
harus tau di situ tu kamu ngapain, belajar?
Belajar apa? Bahasa Inggris. Dengan cara
apa? Terus mereka biasanya saya tanya
belajar yang kayak gimana. Belajar apa aja?
Mereka ngomong gini,gini, gini. Itu
kemauan dari mereka. Saya juga tidak akan
menjadi dosen yang nggak fair. Kamu mau
saya apa? Kamu mau saya ngapain?
Jawabnya kan rata-rata teaching you.
Seperti itu. Itu my big secret lho
ha..ha..ha.Because I always asked that
question and then teaching you, teaching
you. help.help.help. And I always say sorry
I will not teaching you.I don’t want to teach
2-V6-1-ET-T-SA
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
129
you. And I will say I am just facility. I will
help you but firstly you have to help you
first. You have to help yourself first. And
help your friends. And then I will help you
too. Dan itu penting banget. Ketika mereka
tidak mau membantu diri mereka sendiri,
manja dong nanti jadinya. Bantu diri sendiri
itu misalnya apa ya? kalo boleh ya bawa
kamuslah. Masa saya yang harus teach you
all the time. Apa artinya e..misalnya teller?
Itu nggak banget. Karena kamu udah
university level lho. Jadi saya itu di poinnya
adalah membantu bagaimana kamu itu
mandiri disini terus kamu bisanya apa, lha
saya bantuin yang gak bisa itu bagian saya,
gitu. Jangan berharap saya feed you. That’s
a thing that I really avoid being a teacher,
feeding. Memberitahu dengan cara kotbah
mungkin saya sering tapi itupun setelah
mereka do something or produce
something.
R7 Nah pada saat itu apakah Anda
mempersiapkan materi sebelumnya,
malamnya?
V8 What do you mean?
R9 Walaupun anda tahu itu pertemuan pertama
Apakah anda menyiapkan materi atau
tidak?
V9 What do you mean by material?
R10 Handout, lesson plan, may be.
V10 That’s a thing that I avoid you know
ha..ha..ha..
R11 So you avoided it.
V11 I avoided material. Material same with
handout. Remember, I avoid that thing.
R12 So you avoid making handout?
V12 No. I did not say that. I never say that
material is the same with handout.
R13 So in your opinion, apa itu?
V13 No..no I will not give opinion what is
material. But I will say..I will not make a
conclusion. But material for me is not the
same with handout. Definitely not the same.
So if you asked me did you prepare some
materials..sure..I’m teaching. Preparing
materials for sure. But not handout. In the
first meeting time we know each other,
rules and also how the class is going..so I
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
130
not material same with handout because I
avoid handout. The problem is on the first
meeting I told you the time for us to know
each other. Paperless may be. I don’t want
to be busy with the paper. Just that. And if
you asked me about material ya..material
bisa lho I can prepare with the powerpoint,
misalnya song bisa itu juga namanya
material kan. They can learn something
with that. Nah itu yang harus dimengerti
dari seorang teacher, menurut saya. Pinter-
pinternya kita suatu activity itu menjadi
sebuah lesson buat mereka.Simple lho,
simple sekali. Kalo misalnya ngomongin
apa itu misalnya ngomongin game, wah
simple banget. Cuma suruh buat kelompok
terus nanti disitu kita perkenalan jadi
poinnya itu tidak yang: “Halo my name is
something. I am from..” gitu. Ya aku harus
..mereka. Bahkan kadang-kadang saya
meeting pertama lupa lho untuk..mungkin
melewatkan ya. Namanya Hendro misalnya.
Nama lengkapnya siapa. Itu malah saya
kadang-kadang melewatkan itu. Tapi saya
tau dia siapa. For example gamenya adalah
saya tidak tau kamu nama panjangnya
siapa, saya tahunya nickname ya kalo
biasanya kita panggil. Jadi silahkan duduk
berdasarkan alfabet. Itu kan sebenarnya trik
saya aja. biar saya bisa ngapalin mereka
dengan mudah. Apalagi semester satu.
Mereka belum terlalu kenal dengan
temennya.Dan saya itu memang model
dosen yang tidak terlalu memuja namanya
grouping ato apa itu namanya nge-
gank.Kalo saya itu satu kelas ya satu kelas,
campur baur. Pasti gitu kalo saya. Jadi
jangan harap deh kalo kelas saya bisa nge-
gank. Pasti saya obrak abrik. Jadi memang
di TEYL itu ada sit and ster. Jadi itu
memang saya lakukan disitu. Mereka harus
ster not in the sense of moving aja but ster
with the friends, harus mingle. Karna
belajar itu tidak hanya dari buku, dari temen
deket. Justru dari temen yang pinter banget
ato yang gak bisa banget itu mereka jadi
bisa belajar. Jadi kalo misalnya ada anak
yang pinter banget, dia bersama dengan
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
131
anak yang kurang bisa. Kadang-kadang
kalo mereka disuruh mencari group,
mereka nggak bakalan deh group yang
sama. Jadi ketika saya memaksa, mau gak
mau. Mau gak mau ini kan lebih pede
untuk, tolong dong dibantu lebih PD.
Oo..caranya gitu. Jadi disitu cara satu sama
lain untuk lebih kuat belajarnya. Jadi disitu
proses belajar mengajar tidak harus
acceptance, dia menerima sesuatu
producing, think. Begitu, bagi saya. Jadi
sebenarnya proses. Many proses happened
in my class. Nanti even in the first meeting.
Jadi tidak hanya sekedar kuliah, doing
something, going home. Itu..it’s impossible
happened in my class.
2-V13-1-ET-T-ST
R14 Apakah pada saat itu Anda juga membuat
assessment?Buat mereka.
V14 Assessment kayak apa tuh?
R15 Assessment pada aktivitas yang mereka
lakukan
V15 Giving score at that time? Nooo..Tapi
bukan assessment, evaluation untuk jangka
panjang. Yang saya tau. Biasanya meeting 1
kan udah kelihatan siapa yang bagaimana
bagaimana. Nah itu evaluation in the sense
of untuk class progress. Nah maka saya.
Dan ketika nanti saya sit and ster. ini
potensi dimana, seperti apa, ini kurang .
Nanti apa sih yang harus saya lakukan for
the next meeting. Itukan evaluation dalam
hal ..karena assessment itu kan there so
many things. Tidak hanya ke student aja ya.
Itu kan diolah prosesnya. Jadi saya memang
fokus ke teaching learning proses juga
disitu. Jadi tau kurangnya dimana lebihnya
dimana. Oh si diapain. Maka kita membuat
materi kadang juga ada yang materi for the
whole semester tapi ada juga materi yang.
Dalam arti begini, untuk kelas yang
misalnya sudah selesai kita ngomongin
tentang introduction terus kelas sebelah
ternyata belum, for the very next meeting
aku harus apa. Apakah harus menambah
material lagi ato next meeting itu aku mo
percakapan ato apa, itu tu memang harus
direvisi setiap minggu. Jadi assessment,
evaluation dalam hal pengertian luas. Tapi
2-V15-1-ET-AW
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
132
nggak scoring, nggak boleh scoring. Seperti
itu.
R16 Jadi kapan scoring anda lakukan?
V16 Scoring saya lakukan ketika saya selalu
mengatakan students satu ya yang..yang
paling challenges. Misalnya begini kita
udah belajar percakapan. Next meeting saya
akan memberi mereka kesempatan oke
siapa yang mau take my challenge, take my
chance I will give you this. For example for
couples misalnya. Pasangan untuk masuk
ke depan. Perform. saya tidak pernah
mengatakan besok, minggu depan kalian
perform. I always say prepare by yourself.
Yang belum tau nyepelein, “alah besoklah”.
ketika mereka udah maju tek,tek gitu, saya
mengatakan yang maju ini pasti dapat score
khusus namanya daily score dan biasanya
saya kasih bonus misalnya candy lah, coklat
lah, ato apalah. Itu meningkatkan awareness
yang “hahh...dinilai ya, oo..berarti bisa ya”.
Jadi anak tu saya gak perlu nyuruh-nyuruh,
kamu ini ya maju ayo maju maju sapa yang
maju. Saya katakan saya memberi
kesempatan your decision. Saya disitu juga
mengajarkan tentang kebudayaan belajar
yang bukan Indonesia banget, yang kita
selalu feed and asked the students to do.
Yak santi ayo maju. Really. mau itu sunyi
senyap seperti apa. Nggak ada yang maju
saya tungguin. Nggak ada yang maju oke
kita continue. Jadi e.. sepele ya hanya untuk
maju aja. Karena ketika saya menyuruh at
least tidak ada ke-pede-an dari mereka.
Tetapi ketika mereka, “miss saya miss” itu
raising competencenya itu disitu.
Keberanian juga kan bravery. Nah ketika
ada yang maju kemudian nular, “wah aku
gak mau pokoknya besok minggu depan”.
Nah kadang setelah 2 meeting gitu yang
maju itu masih itu-itu aja maksudnya yang
aku tau udah pinter maka aku akan
mengatakan meeting berikutnya. Sekarang
saya memberikan kesempatan yang belum
pernah maju, yang dua meeting kemarin
nggak maju. Nah itu memberikan mereka
(keinginan untuk) maju. Itu salah satunya
untuk scoring ya..scoring yang apa..daily.
2-V16-1-ET-T-SA
2-V16-1-ET-T-ST
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
133
Kalau untuk lainnya nanti akan ada kuis,
nanti akan ada assignment di rumah, group
project. Saya sering memberikan group
project mid semester.
R17 Nah itu gimana memberikan kriteria ini
bagus ato ini nggak dalam scoring.
V17 kok scoring complicated sekali ya? nggak
bisa dibilang bagus. untuk yang mana dulu.
untuk performance yang mana?
R18 O jadi masing-masing ada sendiri ya
tahapnya?
V18 Iya. Jadi untuk kuis kan jelas. misalnya
tentang apa grammar
R19 Oo..jadi berbagai macam skill yang
diajarkan di kelas miss.
V19 Iya
R20 apa saja skillnya miss?
V20 yang untuk apa?
R21 yang Bahasa Inggris untuk semester awal.
V21 Yang semester awal itu. Jadi gini aja dulu
deh. Untuk bahasa Inggris di Akuntasi
waktu saya mengajar dulu ya itu dengan
stage yang sangat perfect sekali maka saya
pilih yang 2014 kemarin itu adalah salah
satunya adalah saya itu mendapatkan
kesempatan mendesain my own syllabus itu
dari Bahasa Inggris 1, 2, 3. Saya
merencanakan itu dengan pak Supar. Pak
Supar mengiyakan. Jadi Bahasa Inggris 1
itu General English. Bahasa Inggris 2 itu
fokus ke ESP tetapi sebenarnya fokusnya ke
job hunting dan wait..emm..yah Job
Hunting. Tetapi saya kemarin membuat Job
Hunting dan..wait..wait..company profile
seperti itu, Talking about company. Yang
ketiga baru TOEFL. Nah untuk Bahasa
Inggris 1 itukan sebenarnya General
English dalam arti disitu diajarkan skill,
conversation kemudian ada writing juga
kemudian listening. Kalo skillsnya empat-
empatnya ada semua. Tapi meskipun
kalimatnya general tapi tetep saya fokuskan
ke Accounting, maksudnya English
Business begitu. Bagaimana caranya salah
satunya introduction ketika kita introduce
always tell them we are now learning about
English for Business. So there will be no
“Hello, I am a student of Sanata Dharma,
2-V21-1-ET-E-AU
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
134
I’m semester one. ” You will not say that.
Jadi biasanya ya untuk yang meeting
pertama itu ato meeting kedua.. jadi
sebelum saya mengajar semuanya saya ajak
mereka fokus ke bisnis kemudian kalo
bisnis itu kamu bayangannya kerja dimana.
Jadi mereka harus tau dulu tentang types of
jobs. Kalo di kurikulum yang lama itu
sebenarnya ada ngomongin work tapi itu tu
dunia apa sih work tentang...umum banget.
Describing job itu ada, General English.
Cuman General yang lama itu Describing
Job in general. Saya fokuskan, pokoknya
semua saya fokuskan. Sama materinya
mirip gitu ya, Introduction ada, Describing
job ada, Daily routines ada, tapi semuanya
selalu mengerucut kepada bisnis.
Introduction ya..assume that you are a
manager of company apa, Marketing
manager misalnya. Assume that you are a
teller, assume that you are ..jadi kamu mau
jadi apa yang berhubungan dengan itu. Aku
mau jadi..aku mau jadi appraiser..yah please
seperti itu. Jadi ketika mereka udah
introduction mereka udah langsung
memperkenalkan diri, “Aku pekerjaan ini ,
aku bekerja di perusahaan ini, job desc ku
seperti ini”. Seperti itu. Nanti ketika
ngomongin Daily Routines juga ngomongin
seorang ya..apa ya appraiser misalnya, E
jadi aku setiap pagi ke kantor, kemudian
aku akan mengecek data-data yang masuk,
kemudian aku menelpon ke lokasi untuk
melihat apakah gudangnya itu sudah apa itu
namanya jaminannya atau agunannya sesuai
atau tidak terus nanti saya akan buat laporan
Seperti itu mereka itukan sudah mengerucut
ke bidang ekonominya mereka gitu loh.
Maka kalo ingin disebut General English ya
kita emang General English. Daily routines
itu kan general ya, Present Tense kan.
ngomongin apa subject+verb 1, iya kan
miss.Terus ngomong usually, always,
seperti itu..itu kan general but.. tak bikin
ESP..kenapa ini ESP ato apa. Tapi kalo
yang ESP dalam artian ngomongin business
letter ya benar-benar business letter ato
bacaan tentang ekonomi. Tapi ini nggak.
2-V21-1-ET-E-AU
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
135
Nggak seperti itu memang. Cuman disitu
saya sisipkan beberapa bacaan. Misalnya
yang berhubungan dengan Accounting atau
bisnis. Seperti itu sih.
R22 Nah ketika ini miss, itu kan tadi udah
memulai kelas ya, terus aktivitas di tengah-
tengah sudah ya. Nah ketika mengakiri
miss..mengakhiri classroom itu apa sih yang
biasanya anda lakukan..bukan biasanya..apa
yang anda lakukan pada saat itu?
mengakhiri kelas, jadi pelajaran udah mau
selesai nih..the lesson at that day. What did
you do at that day?
V22 Sebentar..Maksudnya dalam setiap meeting
ya?
R23 Boleh, pada saat itu lah ya.
V23 Setiap meeting kan maksudnya? bukan pada
akhir semester?
R24 Yang tadi awal semester itu, at that time.
V24 O ya..I mean every meeting of every of my
..karena semuanya sama. Yang jelas saya
akan sum up apa yg dipelajari hari ini..sum
apa gitu ya lebih menanyakan ke mereka,
belajar apa.satu. Yang kedua, kamu merasa
bagaimana dengan pelajaran yang kamu
dapat hari ini. Merasa itu bisa feeling,
karna kamu di kelas bagaimana dan feeling
umum ya. Kedua tentang kuliah yang
dipelajari tadi. Misalnya e...tadi aku capek
banget miss. Ngantuk. Aku merasa seneng,
tapi kalo ngomongin materi aku merasa ini.
Pokoknya mereka harus memberikan a kind
of feedback pada saat itu juga supaya nanti
ya itu..sangu aku untuk the next meeting.
Seperti itu. Aku ngomongin kemudian aku
me-sum up apa yang mereka rasakan. kita
juga memberi feedback untuk mereka.
Misalnya hari ini kalian bagus sekali. Saya
suka dengan ketika kalian percakapan
kalian percakapannya meskipun 52 tapi
semuanya melakukan dengan baik,
misalnya.Tadi waktu percakapan masih
banyak yang ini memakai bahasa Indonesia.
Saya akan memberikan feedback. Jadi for
the next meeting pasti mereka akan lebih
alert. Aku harus ngapalin for the next
meeting. E..kemudian ada assignment ato
apa aku berikan gitu. Biasanya aku kasih
2-V24-1-ET-T-AW
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
136
penyemangat. Jelas itu penyemangat in the
end of the lesson. Jadi mereka gak merasa
sia-sia melakukan. Jadi tidak sia-sia
mereka.
R25 Sekarang ngomongin buku-buku yang Anda
gunakan miss. Referensi. Pada saat itu apa
sih yang Anda pakai dan bagaimana
menurut Anda. Apakah sudah cukup?
V25 Kalau untuk menyebutkan judul dan
pengarang saya tidak hapal. Tidak master
dalam hal itu. Saya adalah orang pelupa
untuk hal itu. Tapi pasti kalo ditanya e..apa
itu namanya..wait..covernya warna
apa..saya pasti masih ingat ha..ha..Itu
kelebihan saya disitu dan saya kekurangan
saya di situ. E..pasti saya memakai buku-
buku yang berhubungan dengan saya
memakai buku yang akademik dalam arti
yang ini lho..maksudnya buku yang
didesain untuk mengajar. Dan juga buku
yang dijual di Gramed, kan ada itu . Dia
gak untuk mengajar. Misalnya gini English
for Bank teller. Disitu kan hanya
conversation aja. Disitu hanya grammar
thok misalnya. Jadi gak ada step-step untuk
mengajar.Kan buku-buku untuk
pengajaran itu biasanya introductionnya
apa, kemudian selanjutnya conversation.
Kemudian nggak..bisa kebayang nggak
modelnya. Kalo buku-buku yang untuk
pengajaran dan buku yang non-pengajaran.
Jadi buku-buku umum misalnya bahasa
Inggris untuk banking. Jadi disitu hanya
istilah-istilah perbankan,misalnya.Ekspresi-
ekpresi yang dipakai di perbankan. ya
vocab dan percakapan. Kayak gitu. Jadi
sama kayak buku-buku. Kemudian internet
jelas. Kalo ngomongin reference itu tidak
sama dengan buku ya. Saya nggak bisa
menyamakan reference sama dengan buku
dan buku cetak dengan terbitan. Karena apa
..Saya itu mengacu dengan apapun yang
berhubungan dengan Ekonomi. Misalnya ya
Business English ya termasuk koran,
majalah, internet, berita apa ato apa, ada
apa di internet ataupun material-material
yang memang diajarkan untuk diajarkan
Business English gitu ya, aku nyari gitu. Itu
2-V25-1-ET-E-AU
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
137
reference. Jadi sebenarnya ketika aku
membuat handout, material yang sama
dengan handout itu aku akan membuat my
really own design. Mulai dari title, contoh
percakapan, untuk membuat kotak-
kotaknya, untuk grammar focus misalnya
termasuk exercise, itu biasanya my own.
Tapi mungkin untuk contoh percakapan aku
akan refer to misalnya ada contoh tapi
nanti biasanya aku bisa persis gitu atau e..
ini..aku ambil beberapa yang sama ato aku
hanya curi ide aja kemudian aku bikin my
own conversation. Seperti itu. Jadi
memang..memang agak..gak tau..antara
sombong ha..ha..atau nggak rendah hati
ha..ha..ato apa ya..ha..ha..Atau kalo saya itu
emang kurang pinter untuk memakai
materi-materi yang sudah terbitan begitu,
karena kadang ya aku nggak tau maunya sih
pengarang dan kebetulan banget ini buku
yang disediakan kampus yang istilahnya
gini karena general English itu kan masih
mengacu kepada materi yang dibuatkan
oleh kampus, materi yang sama dengan
handout, ada. Dan itu sebenarnya bener-
bener General English yang diambil dari
buku dan bukunya adalah very very popular
used by some English courses. Jadi
mungkin sih ya anak-anak itu gak make tapi
emang dulu saya sih pernah sekali,emang
gak disitu di Sanata Dharma, ada anak yang
ketika diajarkan mengatakan, “Bu dulu aku
pake buku ini lho waktu kursus”. Itu buat
saya tu jadi titik itu saya yang nggak paling
suka buku mengajar. Dan ini modelnya
adalah buku yang mending ya kalo satu
buku jleng gitu. Ini buku yang diambil buku
yang di copy paste kemudian apa disusun
ulang itu lho..ya itu usaha yang bagus sih
..quite good lah terus nanti diambil
beberapa unitnya aja karena itu dibuku itu
sampe 20 unit itu diambil 14 unit aja.
Seperti itu. Mungkin aku nggak tau
maksudnya orang yang compile itu terus
seperti apa, listeningnya juga rempong.
Kadang saya memang menggunakan
listening itu, sama-sama listening tapi aku
bisa bikin exercise sendiri. Jadi gak mesti
2-V25-1-ET-E-AU
2-V25-1-ET-T-DIS
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
138
sama dengan yang di situ persis, gitu kan.
Kalo misalnya listeningnya e..ada
percakapan bahkan kadangnya percakapan
saya bikin blank, blank, blank nanti anak
mendengarkan terus ini atau matching atau
saya bikin scrambled..scrambled apa itu
namanya sentences, arranged it into
conversation. Jadi my own idea. Karena aku
mau ngajar jadi aku harus tau apa yang
akan aku lakukan dengan kertas ini. Nah
maka aku mengatakan material is not the
same with the handout tu itu. Mungkin saat
itu, hari itu, mereka gak nerima sama sekali
kertas dari aku tapi mereka belajar
conversation. Lha kok bisa? karena aku
suruh mereka ordered the jumbled
sentences tadi. Dari situ tu mereka
menganalisa. Abis menganalisa misalnya ni
tuh mereka terus menuliskan. Disitu
ngomongin tentang Describing Job
misalnya. Mana yang describing job, terus
sentencenya apa, terus tensesnya apa yang
dipake, misalnya seperti itu. Mereka udah
conclude sendiri. Karena memang aku tuh
orangnya antara itu tadi saya..apa ya
maksudnya memang tidak mau yang
namanya anaknya dikita tadi lho. Salah gak
papa. Saya selalu begitu. Tapi mereka tu
mikir dulu, gitu. Karena saya nggak mau
membuat anak manja. Jadi ketika
mereka..apa itu namanya..sudah conclude
something..nah itu kan berarti mereka, dari
yang tau tau sedikit-sedikit jadi banyak.
Jadi yang oo...berarti anak-anak sudah tau
sekian berarti aku tinggal nambahin yang
belum tau. Seperti itu.Ya udah terus nanti
dari materi atau game-game yang kita
lakukan disitu mereka biasanya conclude.
Mereka membuat kalimat sendiri. Ending-
endingnya kan karena mereka first
conversation mereka membuat conversation
terus. Tiap conversation pun mereka harus
ada writing misalnya describing their own
job tapi dalam bentuk tulisan, writing. Kan
ada conversation misalnya “Hello James
what do you do? “ Oh I am a bank teller”.
“Really. Where do you work?” Kan
conversation tapi kalo mampu terus
2-V25-1-ET-T-SA
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
139
menuliskan: my name is James. I work in
world bank. Everyday I usually apa. seperti
itu.
R26 Nah tadi kan materinya menarik sekali.
sekarang bagaimana pada saat itu Anda
menghadapi mahasiswa yang lemah bahasa
Inggrisnya? Itu gimana caranya? apakah
anda pada saat itu piye maksudnya
bagaimana menghadapi? What did you do?
V26 Menghadapi ya?
R27 Iya motivate them ato apa ha..ha..ha what
did you do?
V27 Menarik sekali..jadi begini. Sebenarnya
saya memakai materi dan membuat materi,
menyiapkan apa..power point, my own
movies, listening, game..itu semua itu
tujuannya apa supaya semua itu
participate. Hanya itu. Jadi saya tidak akan
membedakan dengan yang pinter atau yang
kurang pandai bahasa Inggris kemudian
saya membuat perlakuan khusus
dulu...nggak. Jadi hal umum yang saya
lakukan adalah justru membiarkan mereka
mingle dan participate in every activity
dulu, gitu. mereka harus mengalami: “oh
nyusun kalimat iki susahe kayak gini”.
Mereka dulu. Biar aja. Begitu dulu. Jadi let
them to be the part of the class , to be the
part of activity.. merasakan dulu mereka
harus meng-experience. Saya itu model
guru yang aku sendiri suka ber-experience
dengan pengajaranku. Mereka harus
mengalami. Apapun itu mereka harus
mengalami. Gitu lho. E..ketika mereka udah
mengalami, “oo..ini sulit ya”. Nah di titik
itu aku akan melihat mana ya kesulitannya
dimana ya. Misalnya kayak gitu. Biasanya
ketika aku sudah tau titik-titik mana..kan
gak gampang ya melihat anak-anak yang
bener-bener sudah kurang bahasa Inggris
gimana itu kan gak gampang. Karena
kadang-kadang diem. Diem tau-tau dia gak
bisa ato diem tapi pinter gak tau lho. Seperti
itu. Maka banyak activities. Mungkin two
third, two three meeting I that time to make
sure that oo this kind of student ya quite in
English. Ya saya memang tidak suka terlalu
judging.First meeting ada yang kurang
2-V27-1-ET-E-AU
2-V27-1-ET-T-EQ
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
140
sama dengan dia oo dia low bahasa inggris.
Nggak. Karena low itu banyak hal. Bisa low
karena low bahasa inggrisnya 0 kosong, low
karena nggak ada motivasi, low karena
nggak punya duit buat beli buku kek ato
kamus tapi kan banyak. Jadi buat saya
nggak sama dengan dia diem ato gagaguguk
itu sama dengan dia low,nggak. Jadi after
third meeting ya aku udah tau poin-poinnya
dimana. Jelas, I motivate them. But not
motivate in the sense of kamu, kamu kan
ndak bisa jadi kamu..nggakk. jadi motivate
in the sense of challenging tadi. OK so
many things that you have to do in the class
kan. Jadi misal yang kurang-kurang itu pasti
akan saya beri porsi yang lebih besar untuk
melakukan activity atau do something. Pasti
itu. Dan mereka pasti akan menjawab gak
bisa ha..ha..di titik itu saya akan
mengatakan justru itu kamu latihan. Kamu
nggak bisa kok gak mau latih. Kamu bisa.
Kan begitu. Yang sangat menarik
ketika..ini..untuk sharing ya..ini pertama
kali saya kemarin mendengar satu
mahasiswa drop karena bilang gini, “Miss
temen saya mau drop”. “Ngapain?”
“Karena dia nggak bisa bahasa inggrisnya”.
Dalam hati saya maaf ya, secara kasar
mengatakan itu goblok sebenarnya seperti
itu miss. Sorry ya. Bodoh sebenarnya tu
disitu. Kalo kamu memang nggak bisa
maka belajar. Entah nanti nilainya ntar
kamu dapat E, dapat D, atau A kita nggak
tau. Tapi ketika kamu belajar kamu jadi tau
kita dikit kamu harus mengalami dulu
begitu lho. Artinya disini kan memang dia
kan mentality sudah nggak bisa. Tapi kalau
di kelas se low apapun dia, dia pasti oo..gini
ya belajar itu. Nah dititik itu saya anggap
dia emang pintar. Pintar itu ya begitu.
begitu loh. maka student ketika melakukan:
miss I cant. kamu nggak bisa apa? nggak
bisa ngomong Inggris. Maka kamu belajar
ngomong sana. Kemudian malu. Kamu ke
depan sering-sering biar nggak malu. Kan
begitu. Kemudian saya inggrisnya jelek ini
grammarnya. Belajar kalo seperti itu. Nah
disitu aku mengatakan kamu tu pintar
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
141
cuman perlu banyak belajar dalam hal ini,
ini,ini. Kan orang pintar hanya karena
motivated ato nggak. Nah untuk anak-anak
yang seperti itu ya. Terus ketika biasanya
gini ketika diberi challenge kalo anak-anak
yang tukang cari nilai biasanya saya miss
saya miss.rebutan jawab gitu. Maka saya
ketika untuk hal-hal yang tidak untuk cari
nilai saya Cuma baca percakapannya. Tadi
sudah latihan kan percakapannya. coba sini
baca di depan. Itu saya selalu memilih saya
nggak choosing karena itu kan untuk baca
percakapan nggak perlu siapa yang mau
baca. Karena saya emang untuk anak-anak
yang tadi kurang gitu ya. Saya memang
menyuruh. Tapi bukan karena aku mau feed
them. Karena dalam rangka motivate. Nah
disitu kan mereka pasti dengan
pronunciation yang salah lah, dengan
gagagugu mereka, dengan yang baca..apa
itu namanya..satu kalimat aja setahun. Kan
banyak yang seperti itu. Ya udah itu cara
motivatenya. O bagus sekali. Good. Thank
you. Dan mereka kan bisa ya aku baca. kan
seperti itu. Itu langkah-langkah kecil di
kelas. Kemudian itu saya tu emang agak
selo. Iya karena ketika mereka
membuat..apa ya..e..activity di kelas. Terus
nanti misalnya conversation berdua dua itu
selalu saya beri feedback, tulisan bahkan
kalo yang kurang sekali setelah itu saya
kasih tau. Memang wasting time banget
kesannya. E kamu tu bagus gila kamu tu
sebenarnya punya potensi pinter Inggris
kan gitu. tapi Cuma kurang latihan
gini,gini. Untuk yang low. Jadi ada pos-pos
tertentu kapan saya adalah memotivasi
mereka secara individual, secara lebih
fokus. nggak klasikal. Itu untuk yang lebih
ini ya. Selain itu saya juga kadang-kadang
memanggil mereka. Tapi ini untuk case-nya
sangat jarang sekali. Tapi kebetulan yang
ku bilang yang mengesan tadi yang
kebetulan banget mereka tiga semester
dengan saya itu bener-bener aku pegang ini
memang bener-bener low nya terlalu
banyak. Yang kemarin. memang ya karena
angkatan itu agak banyak maaf..Sanata
2-V27-1-ET-T-EM
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
142
Dharma itu memang menerima yang
kurang-kurang. itu karena memang banyak
hal ya.Karena kita humanis jadi tidak boleh
menolak mahasiswa especially for the
students from the low family lah. Dari
Eastern part of Indonesia. Seperti itu
memang harus diterima kan. Kebetulan
kemarin agak banyak jadi untuk special, my
first time, selama saya ngajar di Sanata
Dharma university, saya memberi pelajaran
tambahan. Khusus buat mereka. Mereka
gratis tis. Dan kita disitu tu pokoknya
hanya maen game sepuas mereka hanya
untuk apa berani ngomong. Itu khusus,
spesial banget, kemarin. Jadi kalau kamu
tanya yang mengesan itu ya itu, semester
itu, spesial sekali. Tapi yang organized
mereka. saya taunya disitu. Disitu kita
kumpul bareng. Kita ngobrol. Dan memang
saya mengatakan nanti yang aktif memang
tambah. Dalam arti gini, sebenarnya bukan
karna itu tapi mereka termotivasi maka
mereka menjadi lebih PD di kelas. Ketika
menjadi lebih PD di kelas kan mereka kan
otomatis nilainya nambah. Jadi bahasa saya,
“Ayo nanti pasti dapat nilai tambah.” Ya
pasti tho ya karena mereka lebih PD. Jadi
nilai tambahnya seakan-akan dari aku.
Padahal nggak, mereka sendiri. Karena
menjadi lebih PD. Di kelas yang kemarin
itu malu-malu gitu jadi maju di kelas, itu
ada itu. Saya jadi suka banget kelas itu.
Namanya Edo, Gilang, arek itu ya. Ah di
kelas itu yang dulu nggak bisa. Tapi mereka
hajar aja yang sudah semester berikut-
berikutnya, lebih PD, lebih PD seperti itu.
Jadi itu untuk kasus yang my first case ya
dan itu memberi motivasi dalam hal
personal sekali dan saya memang ngobrol,
keluar kita, WA-nan, kita apa gitu, emang
kita lakuin juga. Pokoknya membuat a kind
of personal bridge with them. Mereka
merasa nyaman dengan aku tetapi juga
motivate in the class. Nggak hanya personal
aja. Emang saya nggak terlalu suka
memberi apa itu kind of speech ya, kamu tu
gini,gini terus all the time. Ayo kamu
belajar bahasa Inggris. Aku lebih suka
2-V27-1-ET-T-ST
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
143
action di kelas. Saya memberi motivasinya
ya dengan cara seperti itu, “Ayo maju”.
Seperti itu.
R28 About the book. Was it prepared by you or
by university?
V28 Dari universitas sebenarnya menyediakan
buku yang didesain waktu itu oleh beberapa
dosen begitu. Ya itu tadi saya mengatakan
terlalu sombong atau bagaimana maka saya
tidak pernah memakai buku itu sama sekali.
Saya memakai buku itu seumur hidup
hanya sekali. waktu itu pertama kali nya
saya mengajar General English di Sanata
Dharma dan mungkin ini akan menjadi
kasus yang terkuak ha..ha..ha..selama ini
ya,ya aja jadi saya tu emang orang
modelnya waktu semester itu jadi anak
manis ya. Masih manis sih. Ini bukunya
gini, gini. Karena nggak tau apa-apa ya
udah. Karena ngelihat banyak lack of the
book, lack and leak ya, kekurangan dan
bocor sana sini ya saya harus nambal. Kok
saya mengatakan itu lack, ya harus nambah
dimana gitu. Maka for the next year and
semester saya menambah-nambah.
Untungnya dari Akuntasi ini cukup
beruntung saya bilang karena saya mengajar
Akuntansi sudah bertahun-tahun di
Psikologi dan TI waktu itu . Bersemester-
semester lebih tepatnya. Mungkin 2 atau 3
tahun ya. Jadi ketika disana udah mateng
dan aku tau apa yang harus aku lakukan.
Kemudian saya juga mengajar di Akuntasi
itu untuk pas awal semester e.. pertama kali
saya ngajar di akuntansi materinya masih
memakai buku itu dengan tambahan saya.
Saya belum bepikir ke ESP karena saya
pikir waktu itu ESP nya itu akan setelah
General English yang benar-benar general
banget, yang ngomongin many things, saya
pikir akan mengacu pada specific ESP yang
akan membuat mereka tu ini ni.. what do
you called it ..equiped them to be ready in a
real world. Kok ya enggak. kayak gitu loh.
Maka setelah itu jumping ke cari pekerjaan,
ternyata Bahasa Inggris II nya, bahasa
Inggrisnya adalah Job Hunting. jadi Job
Hunting adalah maaf mencari lowongan di
2-V28-1-ET-E-AU
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
144
koran, kemudian menyiapkan dengan
wawancara, kemudian apa sih yang harus
kamu lakukan ketika di . seperti tu kan. ya
saya terus ada sesuatu yang hilang kan
ditengahnya itu. apa, terus mereka kalau
bisa describing job apa mereka bisa
ngomongin, apa mereka bisa jg ngomongin
negotiating, apa mereka jg bisa apa tu
promoting product, karena nggak dibahas di
general english. Nggak ada disitu di bahasa
inggris yang ke II itu. Jadi ketika mengajar
bahasa inggris II yang adalah job hunting
ketika itu saya ketika pertama kali
mengajar job hunting juga okelah saya
masih yang job hunting. tapi ketika
mendapat kesempatan untuk saya , dari pak
Suparnya sendiri ini pokoknya Miss Vero
nanti bahasa inggris I,II, III seperti ini
gimana manut. Wah saya langsung
membuat jembatan. Pak gimana kalo
begini. Setuju sekali. Wah saya bahagia itu.
Maka buku itu kebetulan setelah saya pakai
sekali berikutnya saya modify, hanya
idenya saja yang saya pake misalnya tadi
introduction ada, describing job, describing
places itu ada memang tetapi saya ubah
menjadi describing apa ya o asking and
giving information. Karena disitu yang
lama kan ngomongin giving direction.
Terlalu spesifik ya. Kalo disini asking
giving information itu lebih general. Nah
nati kenapa mereka harus belajar asking
and giving . itu kan general banget. Nggak.
nanti kan disitu banyak fokus dimana
making inquiries sih purposenya. Kamu
membuat pertanyaan kan. kemudian
menjelaskan. saya anggap giving direction
itu tidak perlu diajarkan yang bagaimana-
bagaimanalah di kuliahan karena itu mereka
bisa belajar di inilah sebut SMA. O ya
tambah satu lagi. e saya menganggap ya,
memang ini assumption yang mungkin
salah, karena ini jaman teknologi juga lho.
Ini sudah 2000 berapa sih kok ya kamu
misalnnya satu kata gak tau aja kok mesti
mengandalkan dosen. Masa ya kamu nggak
tau tentang berita-berita atau apa. Kamu
bisa cari di Google maksud saya seperti itu.
2-V28-1-ET-T-SA
2-V28-1-ET-E-AU
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
145
lain dulu dengan kita waktu misalnya
kuliah itu giving direction diajarkan bener-
bener yang kayak go straight sama dengna
apa misalnya. Sekarang itu sudah masuk ke
asking giving information jadi mereka ya
udah otomatis lah harus tau. seperti itu.
belajar dimana gitu kek. memang jadinya
tingkat tinggi banget bahasa inggrisnya tapi
itu kan hal yang ..apa ya
miss..sederhanalah. kalo kmu gak tau disini
ya cari di les-lesan lah jgn di kelas ini, saya
begitu. di kelas ini sudah aplikatif. kamu
udah apply apa yang sudah kamu tau
kemarin. Nah disitu saya kemudian
membuat materi sendiri yang bener-bener
itu tadi ESP tapi masih general dalam arti
gini miss general saya adalah untuk
skillnya aja deh. Artinya dia memang
masuk ke speaking, ada reading dan
listening. Tapi kalo ESP dia emang
pembahasan semua tentang English
business, bisnis bener-bener. Itu juga ada
complaining. Handling complain gimana.
Handling complainnya yang bener-bener
berhubungan dengan bisnis. Kalo orang
bisnis komplainnya tentang apa aja gitu.
Produknya lah, pengiriman barangnya
telatlah, transaksinya gagal lah.itu mereka
harus tau kalo komplain di bidang ini apa
gitu. Jadi yang terus kita distu juga belajar
tentang vocabulary memang jadinya nggak
fokus 100 % ya miss. kita ngomongin disitu
ada kalimat apa aja e sorry vocabulary
berhubungan dengan bisnis itu apa aja.
Memang begitu ya. Terus gak begitu
fokus.Tapi disitu ya kita gali aja deh ketika
mereka ngomong miss aku mau
complaining di bank, misalnya. Ya udah
mereka terus..dengan begitu mereka terus
mengenal sendiri miss. Otomatis ini lho
miss..uangnya lecek misalnya. Ya udah
mereka jadi mengenal uangnya.uang kertas
ato uang . ini miss ceknya e..kosong.bad
cheque. nah disini bisa mereka otomatis
bisa belajar. itu juga saya sebut sebut
reference lho miss. artinya saya nggak bisa
memberikan semua vocabulary karena
mungkin kan banyak kayak yang aku bilang
2-V28-1-ET-E-AU
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
146
tadi iya miss banyak sekali. mungkin
mereka yang ngomongin tentang produk
e..online shop misalnya, kok barangnya
belum ini. Ngomongin shipping. Ya kan?
Terus ngomongin apa tu namanya..delivery.
Mungkin berbeda dengan yang di bank tadi.
Jadi disitu mereka belajar otomatis
vocabulary. vocabulary building by
themselves. Dan aku tidak provide yang
100 kata gitu. Karena itu memang nggak
punya waktu juga ya miss.Mau gak mau
disitu memng harus aplikatif.gitu miss.
Terus kalo opinion about the book aku
bilang semua buku itu bagus.Begitu juga
dengan yang diberikan Sanata Dharma itu
juga bagus. Artinya bagus itu apa sesuatu
yang dibuat itu pasti ada tujuannya ya. Kita
nggak tau setiap pengarang masing-masing
bikin apa Cuma bagusnya adalah bagus ato
nggaknya buku adalah tergantung kita yang
baca. Kita bisa mengambil sesuatu atau gak.
Jadi meskipun itu leak and lack many things
here and there tapi aku bisa me... sesuatu.
Oo bisa ya conversationnya bisa seperti ini.
O bisa ya kalo ngomongin dewa octopus itu
seperti ini. Nah itu. Artinya saya tu ketika
baca buku sana sini gak merely tentang . Ide
dibelakang itu yang saya curi miss. itu saya
mungkin sampai sekarang bisa mengajar
dengan kreatif itu mencuri ide itu
he..he..saya pandai dalam hal itu
he..he..Jadi melihat apa sih maunya penulis
ini dibelakang itu materinya kok bisa dibuat
seperti ini . Saya curi-curi ide . I am master
of it. Jadi kalau kenapa saya paling nggak
suka kalo sama orang yang hanya copy
paste saja tanpa membuat new lay out
misalnya tu karena kamu tu gak beride
banget sih gitu.come on take the ideas
ajalah gitu. sekamu ngambil-ngambilnya
apa tu conversationnya yo mbok gambarnya
beda. Misalnya judulnya dibedain. Itu kan
sampe ..apa ya miss namanya layoutannya
itu bener-bener copy paste, sama persis,
font-font itu . buat saya itu aneh gitu.
Jadi..itu satu hal ya..hal lain buat penerima ,
si anak. Ini handout lho, handout dari dosen
gitu. ini gue banget . ketika menajdikan
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
147
handout dan buku meskipun aku gak selalu
pake itu tiap detil halaman mereka juga . ini
punyaku sendiri.ini lain gitu. gak akan
pernah ketemu ditempat lain. Ya kayak
gitu. Jadi kalo opini about the book ya I
helping a lot di kelas. kan aku sendiri jadi
pasti kan tidak punya because i am from
PBI, kita ngomongin bahasa Inggris umum
dan saya tidak punya pengalaman kerja di
accounting , berhubungan dengan bisnis ato
apa, otomatis memang saya harus belajar
banyak dari referensi yang tadi termasuk
koran tadi ya misssudah saya sebutkan.
They are really helping. That’s all.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
148
Appendix 3. The Transcript of Ms. Vera’s Second Interview
Name: Vera (Pseudo name)
Day/Date: Tuesday/ May 10,2016
Time: 14.00-16.00 WIB
Place: Pertamina Tower, Gajahmada University
Role Verbatim Coding
R1 When did you start teaching in Accounting
Department?
V1 2013 or 2012 I guess..
R2 how many classes did you teach at that time?
V2 my first class.. 2 classes
R3 all of them were semester 1 or second
semester or third semester?
V3 First semester
R4 so all of them..2 classes were in the first
semester. How many students at that time?
V4 50 something..ehmm.. 53 or 55 and the other
class was only 48-49. But you know the
students sometimes in the middle of the
semester, they just dropped out or somewhere
out there.Because you know that new students
..may be they..they tried to enter Sanata
Dharma but in the middle they had another
choice or what and in the beginning they had
53 or 54, but in the end of semester because of
registration something, okay, so they had
around 52 or 51 in the end. But that’s not my
problem, I mean this is not because of my
English class I mean.
R5 Alright, so what did you do then?
V5 What do you mean?
R6 What did you do with that class?
V6 of course teaching.
R7 Just tell me then, what did you do?
V7 Teaching.
R8 And how?
V8 How? How did I teach?
R9 I mean with that kind of big class what did you
do?
V9 Ah, that must be very specific
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
149
question..Okay..so your question is what did I
do with that big class. Mmm what do you
want to know?
R10 Everything.
V10 Can you make it into specific one?
R11 When you start the class, how did you start the
class first?
V11 Okay, so for me meeting first was not that
kind of a big deal. That is the first. So for me
just kind of ordinary thing. Because before I
had experience already, teaching in
psychology and in science in Paingan. And I
got many students too. So I already experience
with many students. That is the first. So of
course I did not feel nervous. But I really got
excited like another new students. The first
was because new students. They were new
students so I feel (take a deep breath) “OK
meeting new people.” I always like my new
semester because I love meeting new people.
And then for the second thing was new
semester, new material and then you know if I
met new people especially new students, I
liked to have my own vision and mission
because they were still pure, like I wanted to
build something like a culture, my own culture
or culture in university and also English
culture and also what was that learning culture
in the university e..English learning culture in
the university..so many cultures so I ..it was
not only about coming to the classroom and
then studying English..not for sure. But you
must know that you were here not only for
listening to me so the first I asked the students
what was their goal, what they wanted to do at
that time. Like my question was “What do you
want to do here?”, and then you know that
mostly of them say, “I want to study, I want to
study, I want to study”. But I said, “I will not
teach you, I will not teach you, I will not teach
you. Because the question is what do you
want to do and what do you want me to do”. “I
want to learn, I want to study English and I
want you to teach me”. That’s very general
and common answer right. But the problem
was.. So the first thing that I did was setting
the goal with students. The process of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
150
learning was not only about “I want to study, I
want to learn and I want you teach me, no. But
this was a kind of process that you are going to
be here for the process. In the process you are
going to do your very best and learning from
your self, learning from others and learning
from the teacher”. The first thing that I had to
do was setting the goal with the students
together, ”That you are learning here not only
about learning english because for me English
is important, English is easy. You can learn
everywhere right? But the most important
point here whenever you came to my class is
how to give meaningful the learning process it
self. You are going to learn from yourself and
also from the other students. You are going to
help me, help yourself, and help the other
students. Mean, I am going to I’ll help you ,
I’m going to help the other friends. We are
going to help one another and I’m going to
learn from you too. So it means that, it’s kind
of fairness here everything that I know I am
going to show it to you everything that you
want from me. I’m going to share it. But if you
have something new if you know something
like that I don’t know before you can share it
to me. I’m a kind of open teacher. I do not
restrict like you must do only this thing. Like
whenever you want to make sentence for
example the context and also about the..what
situation.” They were youngsters. “You can
still do what you want”. They felt like this
class was very enjoyable. Things like that.
That was for my very first experience in
teaching accounting students. And that is the
first. The first was about goal, about learning
itself, and also how to learn English. So I told
them that, “You know that learning English
can be done not only in English class. You
can learn English anywhere. You just rely on
me I rely on you, you are completely wrong .
Just like this one, you are now in modern
era,and learning English you can do through
the video, through movies. You can also make
your own club. You can go to some places in
Yogya for example which provides English
service and others you can learn English
anywhere, even in context like in airport you
3-V11-2-ET-T-AW
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
151
can learn English. Wherever you go, you see
some English words and then you can learn
English things.” Like that, Okay. So that’s why
I always asked the students to be more
independent. And then the third is about
accounting itself. So I said to the students
that, “Okay so you are learning here and you
are learning English and then you are
accounting students so let’s make a kind of
connection. So what if you are accounting
students,so what if you are learning English.
So setting the goal that you are learning
English here because you need that. If you
think that you are do not need English you
were accounting students, for your future, for
the very next future, do not think that you
have to be in the class”. So it raised their own
awareness that,”O yeah I need to learn English
because...” Okay and I asked them. “Miss
because I want to go abroad”. “For what?”
“For vacation”. “For what?” “I want to
continue my study”. “For what?” “Because I
want to work there. Miss I want to learn
English because I want to work in multi
national company but in Indonesia. Because I
want, because, because...” OK, whenever they
found their reason, I got the point, they got the
point and that was the deal. So that was the
first and for me it’s very important thing to do.
And I did it in every semester. Although that is
in different class I mean the same student in
the different class, different subject. like in
General English whenever I made my game.
In second semester with exactly the same
students I asked them.. what’s that..same
question. Yeah that one.
3-V11-2-ET-T-SA
R12 So that is how you started the class. and then
what did you do after you setting the goals?
V12 Getting to know each other , the teacher and
the students, the names. and then also usually
I asked the students to Introduce their name
and also where they come from. Only two
important things. important data. In..what’s
that..usually we used games. I used games .
The example like I used..was that grouping
no..no..sorry..what’s that I asked them to sit
based on name alphabet. I asked them sit
based on name alphabet. so for example I said
3-V12-2-ET-T-AW
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
152
to them like this one I don’t know who you
are, I don’t know your name. And this is our
first meeting and I want you to sit based on the
name alphabet ,you know yourself and you
know your friend already, right. I said that
way. and help me to memory. and they will
say based on the name alphabet for example
Aris, Afghan, and after that I asked them to
introduce themselves. So in the first day what I
did to all my classes so far was the same:
setting the goals, and after that getting to know
each other, and then explain the syllabus. But I
had an experience for the Bahasa Inggris 2, I
almost got no time to explain the syllabus but
for me that’s fine. I explained the syllabus for
the next meeting. For the second semester
students in 2015, that is the students in
semester 2, in February 2015. Because on that
day, more we focus on how we dig out
ourselves in the work field. Because for the
second semester students my focus at that
time was about getting a job.
R13 Did you remember in what room at that time?
V13 which one?
R14 the second semester students in 2015
V14 Okay. My first experience ..we started with
my first experience actually. Whenever we
talked about my first experience teaching in
accounting it is in 2014. It was on the fourth
floor but I don’t know, I forgot the name of the
room, but on the fourth floor, that is in the
meeting room. it’s a very big room. Usually
they used it for the meeting. but the next
semester I begged to the administrator
because it’s just too far. I didn’t have the card
to go by lift. and then they moved the class in
two room 52 and 53. That was on the second
floor. and also in semester 3, room 52 and
room 51.
3-V14-2-ET-T-ST
R15 So what time did you teach at that time?
V15 For my first experience you know what can
you imagine this way. I taught on the fourth
floor. and the fourth floor is kind of far. and
then me as..you know what do you called it
part time teacher, I did not have my card to go
through the lift so it’s kind of hard for me and
that time was around 2.30 or 2 p.m. because I
remember I finish around 5. So it was the last
3-V15-2-ET-T-ST
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
153
session. okay may be you can check the
schedule later in Sanata Dharma. The last
session for the class. may be 2 or 2.30 until 5
or 5.10 or something.. yeah 5.10. But after
that I backed again and then I moved to more
convinient room with the better audio and then
the time at 7 to 9, 9 to 11. Why I said seven
because I know that seven was quite hard to
the students , university students to wake up in
the morning . So I challenged them so that is
part of the learning for them .
R16 So how did you manage the big class?
V16 How did I manage? I had told you that I have
an experience about that. I mean this is not
big deal for me, so big class or small class are
the same. The differences about the big class
you know is that more spaces. I need to walk
more and to speak louder. But I really used the
microphone but I used the microphone in my
first experience not because of the students,
not because of the number of students but
because of the room. The room was not wide
but it’s a kind of long room. It’s not really
convinient, and without air conditioner. So
actually for my first experience I did not do
too many action in the class. Firstly because
it’s hot. There’s no air conditioner. And then
the class was just e..not big but long. And the
students are 50. So the first thing to do is..
OK.. I asked the students to sit at the front
row. I always feel that and no blank space
among them so it’s kind of tight sitting.
Anyway. The class will be hotter and they
experienced that. The class was just hotter and
hotter but I try to like make a kind of disguise
activity so that we forget about the situation.
Just like games. And you know I like making
jokes too. I really love making jokes so
whenever the students feel like tired or what,
usually I started with the games. Small games
like it’s a very simple one so for example
counting games one, two, three, boom. You
know that games? just that, counting game.
They are accounting students. And then after
that grouping . Whenever it did in a group of
course the students would be very busy, they
forgot the hot day, in the hot situation like
that. So what did I do in a big class, ya of
3-V16-2-ET-T-ST
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
154
course I tried to be so fit so I can speak loudly
that is the first, second strategy is I asked the
students to sit at the front row without spaces
and then grouping. They are very big ya. So
grouping is the best way and then after that in
grouping I never ask the students to group .
Okay make your own group. Things like that.
Yes, sometimes I asked that way but I avoid
the students to find the groups with the people
they like only. Because I need the students to
help one another. And then I always say help
your friend, help your friend. So I see in one
group I also asked the students to..okay. seems
quite weak to be the leader . Okay speak in
bahasa little bit whenever you becoming the
leader at least ask your friend okay with your
homework for example or you read the
instruction. at least you have . whenever the
leader , the weak person spoke in a very
..spoke in a wrong way the other students will
help. things like that. What else grouping ,
games and the actictivity which is not really
textbook . it will kind of boring ya. and then I
have so many activities. And then interviewing
partner. But of course a little bit difficult thing
about monitoring the students but I try so
whenever I have to be fit because I have to
move around the class all the time. Of course
although the class was big but I tried to move
along the class, coming here to one group to
another group, another group and check and
check and check. But whenever the class
moved-my class moved to another room, it’s
easier for me to check the students, to
monitoring. And then for the second and the
third semester students for the next level
usually I asked for the strong students to help
me to check the other weak or to check like
monitoring the other students. So that’s my
strategy.
R17 So what about the material. What did you
prepare at that time?
V17 what did I prepare? what do you mean?
R18 What kind of material did you prepare? the
lesson
V18 which class?
R19 The class that you have mentioned earlier.
V19 What material did I prepare? of course it
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
155
depends on the objective of my class. Can you
be make it more specific?
R20 Can you tell me what did you teach to the
students at that time? what kind of lesson did
you teach at that time?
V20 Of course I taught them English materials. For
the first semester General English. If you
asked me the materials means the material that
we cannot see. The objectives of the first
semester students were learning about General
English so they focused on speaking and
writing, reading but in a quite general topic,
general themes. Like talking about daily
activity, about the hobbies , talking about
routines , talking about past experiences and
future experience, Okay. And then for the
second semester students that was related to
English ..Okay I focused more on the specific
purpose. It was about getting a job and being
an enterpreneur so of course the material was
about job hunting and for being enterpreneur,
so they were assumed as the people who had
company so they acted like person who had a
company so the material was about reporting
the company performance and then describing
the activities of being specific position in a
company, handling complains, and then
telephoning and then meeting client, things
like that. And then for the semester 3 it’s about
TOEFL. And then if you asked me about what
kind of materials means the physical things
that you asked me. That’s why you confused
me. But if you asked me about what kind of
materials means the physical things the things
that you can see like paper or what, for the
first semester students for my first experience
they had to copy the material from a specific
source. So actually the material means that
paper or that handout that was not made by me
because I just followed what the campus had
already made at that time. But for the very
next semester and also for the very next year
although I taught the same thing, the same
subject, the name was General English but I
thaught in different ways so I made my own
materials and I made my own handout.
3-V20-2-ET-E-AU
R21 So why did you decide to make your own
design at that time? Why did you make the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
156
materials by yourself?
V21 In the first meeting I had never given any kind
of paper related to material entitled English
something something or unit one or what. So I
would ask the students to copy the material or
I would make my own handout or I just gave
one piece of paper for the next meeting. So
that‘s for answering the previous question.
And why I gave my own material because
based on my experience I got the material
from the campus-the General English was too
general. Okay we talked about daily activity,
we talked about routine, we talked about past
tense, we talked about future, perfect. We need
that. Whenever we learn English we need that,
right. This is kind of basic things. But they
were at the university level, for me they had to
use the knowledge that they had got in senior
high school. They had to use their knowledge
to improve themselves and to use it. I just
wanted to make the General English into more
specific. Actually we talked about the same
thing. Daily routines, but not my daily routines
as a student for example. But I asked them to
imagine whenever you are becoming a..for
example director, manager, a teller, whenever
you work later in a specific job position.
what’s your daily routine? Of course I just
wake up and then breakfast and go to the
office, of course I know that. But as a.., for
example salesman or as marketing manager
for example, I must come to the office and
then I have to check the previous report and I
have to give briefing usually in the morning.
So whenever they used I usually give or I
always give or we always have briefing in the
morning, they had to apply in a work context.
Just that. That was the reason.The material
from the campus was okay, definitely okay but
I just made it more specific, in a real context.
3-V21-2-ET-E-AU
3-V21-2-ET-T-SA
3-V21-2-ET-T-AW
R22 Did you find any problem at that time with
your class?
V22 No.
R23 Why?
V23 I’m OK. The students were cooperative and
they were so enthusiastic to join my class. And
they were really eager to learn in my class and
they had a very high spirit. I had never found
Feeling
3-V23-2-ET-T-FPS
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
157
my students were late or like to nod or put the
head on the table or tried to play with their
phone. I had never found that. So I just called
my class was so amazing. So I found..Ok
maybe problem like the audio did not work,
things like that. But generally for the class for
the learning teaching process was just fine.
The students always did the homework.They
helped one another. Sometimes I asked the
students to lead the class and they did it very
well. And they came to the class on time. No
significant problem was in the class. I was
very proud of them. Really.
R24 And then how did you end the class at that
time?
V24 In a specific day? Okay. How I ended. This
was very important. Whenever I want to end
my class. Firstly I asked the students to sum
up. orally. we sum up together what we learnt
previously. and then after that I asked the
students to figure out what things that they
might..they should do in the next meeting. And
they tried to get themselves.. oo.. ya.. we had
to do this one, this one.Okay. After that I gave
them what do you call it, encouragement
statement. And the most important thing was I
always said that they were great. They did
excellent job at that day. That was the ending
of my lesson, the ending of my last word you
were really great, thank you very much for
today, OK see you next week. Just like that.
But previously those other things, summing up
together what we learned in the classroom and
then we discussed together and made a deal.
Not I said you must do this one,this one. But
next week, “Okay, from me you..like this
one..you have to work with this one, this one.
So do you think this one is important or not.
So it means we have to make this one this one
miss”. And then we made a deal for something
for next week. Sometimes, in the end of the
class, I made my own conclusion like for the
class at that day. For example the class did not
get enough practice.So I asked the students to.
today only some students. The smart one like
“Hello I want to practice, I want to practice
miss”. It means that next week I was going to
have, to make a kind of situation so the
3-V24-2-ET-T-EQ
3-V24-2-ET-T-EM
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
158
students-for those weak students- had an
experience. That’s why I asked the students
like “Ok, next week for you I give chance to
practice.” for example.
R25 And then miss about the assessment for your
class at that time?
V25 I just remember about the problem that you
mentioned. May be the problem that you mean
is about the weak student.Actually for my
weak students at the beginning of course it’s
not easy to differentiate which student was
weak which student was not. OK. But for me it
was not really a big deal. But for me whenever
I dealt with those kind of students, they were
not problem in the class. But they had their
own problem right. So the things that I had to
manage ..sorry...I had to help them, so by
giving them more chances.
R26 And then how did you do that?
V26 Ya of course I gave them more chances to
speak in front of the class. I appointed them.
So in the class I always said this, “OK group
e..OK class now you have to practice at home
so I just invite 5 groups. Only invite 5 groups
so practice in front of the class and I’m going
to give you point”. And you know the result
was a kind of smart students,” me, me, me”.
It’s very fast. So that’s why like what I said
before, in the end of the class. Today only 5
students and those who quite already they did
very good but next week I want this,this,this.
“Okay. Your group, your group, your group I
don’t know who. May be I will give chances
only two or three groups, so you must
practice”. So actually what I mentioned was
about the students who were so quite weak.
The students then,” O ya I need to practice”. I
always gave a kind of equal portion for the
practice. And I appointed them to be the
leader or to lead the class.
3-V26-2-ET-T-EQ
R27 Alright. about the assessment. How did you do
that for your class? what kind of
considerations?
V27 I assessed the students not only through the
evaluation last semester through the test only.
Test, evaluation, assessment. So I assessed the
students through their performance, their
process, from the very first meeting until the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
159
end of the semester. Every single thing. I
assessed them from their daily
performance.Daily performance included their
activeness in the class, whether the
participated a lot or not, whether they
participated in group or not. So that’s why for
me remembering the students was important
and I have that kind of skills. Lucky me.
Fortunately. Thanks God I have a good brain-
although I am small-to remember most of the
students. May be one or two I forgot the name.
But I always remember the students. I did
remember that this person was very active,
that person was not. Okay, that was one
participation, for the daily things.Okay. For
the daily performance of course it’s included
on their speaking, writing and sometimes on
listening whenever they asked me question or
not. It was including listening already. And
second, for the daily assessment I usually
helped the students to get what is it..to help
score. You know for the final score, you know
academically they had to submit mid semester
score, final semester score and then quizes and
tugas rumah, or what do they call it tugas-
tugas something, okay, for important points.
Just that. But for me I added with the portfolio,
homework, quiz and then what is that..daily
performance. And I usually put it in a
assignment in the academic in column, things
like that. And then I also tested the students.
Now I’m talking about test. I tested whether
they really know or not. Almost every meeting
I tested them to quizes. I had so many quiz like
quizes like emm..what is it..vocabulary for
example. And then general knowledge. Okay.
General knowledge for example about
structure,Okay. Either written or spoken.
Sometimes I had sentence and they answered.
And then not only quiz but also test. And I
said about the big test. So before they had their
oral test, they had written test, for example. Or
after they had oral test they had the written
test. The written test could be about structure,
making dialogue or making a paragraph. But
usually for the written test it was very
personal. Just question for example. The
question was about daily routines. Although I
3-V27-2-ET-T-AW
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
160
would grade them through the structure, based
on the structure but the question was just like,
“What do you usually do on Sunday?” for
example. But still ya the context was about job
for example. And they would answer, ”I
usually go to the church” for example. For me
it’s quite imposible for the students to cheat
right. This was to eliminate the cheating.
Because they would, they must give different
answer. Okay. So that’s my way to test.
Mmm.. that was for the written. And then for
the..what do you call it.. mid test, the big
examination, usually ..not usually..I had
written and also oral again and the oral
presentation and then..what
else..interview..and then..what do you call
it..dialogue, practising dialogue. But you know
what, every semester ..I mean every single
subject had different type of test, type of
assessment. For job hunting for example I had
to type all the test. The first was interview and
the second was presentation. The presentation
was about company presentation. And then for
the General English for the speaking the oral
test was about ..what is that..role play. Things
like that.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
161
Appendix 4. Surat Keterangan Penelitian
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
162
Appendix 5. The Syllabus of English Class 2 (Ms. Vera)
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
ECONOMICS FACULTY - ACCOUNTING STUDY PROGRAM
SYLLABUS BAHASA INGGRIS 2
Lecturer: Vera (Pseudo name)
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course provides opportunities for the students to be more
competent in using English to deal with the broad overview of job
seeking and business world today. The job seeking covers from
researching themselves, analyzing job vacancy/advertisement,
outlining and developing the skills of writing a cover letter and
curriculum vitae and interviewing practice. Business world
discussion includes some knowledge about entrepreneurship and
global economy knowledge provided in reading and performed in
speaking and writing.
II. GOAL
The students are able to recognize their weakness and strength
and understand how to apply a job by practicing to write CV and
have an interview. The students are also expected to be able to
understand the information delivered in the reading passage
through some reading skills and present their own ideas through
speaking and writing.
III. OBJECTIVES
By the end of this course, students are expected to be able to
1. Identify their strengths and weaknesses.
2. Match their potentials capability and experiences to the market
in need.
3. Write an effective and selling Curriculum Vitae and Cover
Letter.
4. Deal effectively with the interview questions.
5. Response the interview questions fluently and
comprehensively.
6. Read some passages.
7. Understand detail information in the passage by analyzing the
aspects of information and answering the comprehension
questions.
8. Building new vocabulary by memorizing new vocabularies
significant to the topic of discussions.
IV. ASSESSMENT
a. Means of Assessment: Written test, Oral test, Portfolio, Quizzes
b. Scoring weight:
Daily performance 15%
Quizzes 15%
Portfolio 20%
Mid 25%
Final 25%
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
163
V. AGENDA
Meeting Objective Learning
Material
Learning
activities Assessment
1
Syllabus and
Course
Introduction
Goal of study
and Self
reflection
Discussion,
sharing,
individual task
Personal
Statement and
CV
2
Students’ Self
Recognition
Strengths and
weaknesses and
Qualifications
Lecturing,
Class
Discussion,
Individual task
Mind Map of
Strengths and
Weaknesses
3
Students’ Self
Recognition Skills and
experience
Lecturing,
Class
Discussion,
Individual task
Extract of
skills and
experience
4
Researching the
market and
analyzing job
vacancy
Market research
and Job vacancy
Lecturing,
Class
Discussion,
Group task
Report of
Market
Research
5
Writing CV and
Cover Letter
CV and Cover
Letter
Lecturing,
Class
Discussion,
Individual task
CV and Cover
Letter
6
Practicing
interview:
describing
ourselves,
company
background, and
experience.
Before interview
and Common
interview
Questions
Class
discussions,
peer practice
Interview 1
7
Practicing
interview:
describing
transferable
skills and
experience
(Narrative)
Advance
interview
questions
Class
discussions,
peer practice
Interview 2
8 MID TERM TEST
All material
covered from
Meeting1 until
Meeting 6
Oral Test Interview
9
Recount:
understand the
order of events
Passage about
successful
people: history
Class
Discussion,
Individual
Practice, Group
task
Writing about
the keys of
success
10
Scanning Passage about
entrepreneurship
example
Class
Discussion,
Individual
Practice, Group
task
List detail
info.
*ss make
group for
final test
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
164
11
Main ideas and
supporting ideas
Branding Class
Discussion,
Group task
Completing
the table
12
Describing the
meaning of logo
History of Logo Class
Discussion,
Individual
Practice,
Creating
company logo
13
Apply the
information
acquired about
building a
business.
Project: Our own
business
Group Work,
Self
assessment,
group
assessment.
Self and
group
assessment in
the form of
feedback
14 Present the
business
Our own
business
Group
Presentation
Presentation
15 FINAL TEST
All material
covered from
Meeting 9 until
Meeting 15
Individual Test Written Test
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
165
Appendix 6. Ms. Widi’s Syllabus of Bahasa Inggris (MKU)
Widi (Pseudo name)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
166
Appendix 7. Ms. Widi’s Lesson Plan of Unit 1
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
167
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
168
Appendix 8. Bahasa Inggris Textbook (Unit 1)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
169
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
170
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
171
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
172
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
173
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
174
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
175
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
176
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
177
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
178
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
179
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
180
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
181
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
182
Appendix 9. Syllabus for Bahasa Inggris 1 from the University
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI