Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Prosthetics and Orthotics International 1 –13© The International Society forProsthetics and Orthotics 2015Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.navDOI: 10.1177/0309364615588346poi.sagepub.com
INTERNATIONALSOCIETY FOR PROSTHETICSAND ORTHOTICS
Background
Knee–ankle–foot orthoses (KAFOs) are lower extrem-ity devices which extend over the knee, ankle, and foot. KAFOs are prescribed for people with lower limb mus-cle weakness; particularly in quadriceps muscles.1–3 KAFOs are prescribed for varying muscular weakness of the lower limb including poliomyelitis, post-polio syndrome, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), cerebral palsy (CP), spinal cord injury (SCI), and multiple scle-rosis (MS) to provide stability of the lower limb during locomotion.2 Lower limb weakness, especially knee extensor weakness, is a condition that alters normal gait
The gait and energy efficiency of stance control knee–ankle–foot orthoses: A literature review
Masoud Rafiaei1, Mahmood Bahramizadeh1, Mokhtar Arazpour1,2, Mohammad Samadian3, Stephen W Hutchins4 Farzam Farahmand5 and Mohammad A Mardani1
AbstractBackground: The use of knee–ankle–foot orthoses with drop locked knee joints produces some limitations for walking in subjects with quadriceps muscle weakness. The development of stance control orthoses can potentially improve their functionality.Objectives: The aim of this review was to compare the evidence of the effect of stance control orthoses to knee–ankle–foot orthoses with drop locked knee joints in improving kinematic variables and energy efficiency of walking by subjects with quadriceps muscle weakness caused by different pathologies.Study design: Literature review.Methods: Based on selected keywords and their composition, a search was performed in Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases. In total, 18 articles were finally chosen for review.Results: The results of this study demonstrated that this type of orthosis can improve the walking parameters of subjects with quadriceps muscle weakness and spinal cord injury patients when compared to a locked knee–ankle–foot orthosis.Conclusion: There is evidence to show that stance control orthosis designs improve the gait kinematics but not energetic of knee–ankle–foot orthosis users. Development of new designs of stance control orthoses to provide a more normal pattern of walking is still required.
Clinical relevanceStance control orthoses are a new generation of orthotic intervention that could potentially be significant in assisting to improve the gait kinematics by knee–ankle–foot orthosis users.
KeywordsStance control knee joint, knee–ankle–foot orthoses, gait analysis, energy consumption
Date received: 29 October 2014; accepted: 19 April 2015
1 Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
2 Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
4 IHSCR, Faculty of Health & Social Care, University of Salford, Salford, UK
5Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
Corresponding author:Mokhtar Arazpour, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Kodakyar st., Daneshjo Blvd., Evin, Tehran 1985713834, Iran. Email: [email protected]
588346 POI0010.1177/0309364615588346Prosthetics and Orthotics InternationalArazpour et al.research-article2015
Literature Review
2 Prosthetics and Orthotics International
patterns,4 and this condition may result in decreased sta-bility during daily tasks.5
Conventional KAFOs provide stability during walking by locking the knee joint in a fully extended position dur-ing both stance and swing phases. This requires excessive energy consumption and induces abnormal gait events such as circumduction, hip hiking, and vaulting during gait.6,7 Walking with conventional KAFOs can also lead to premature exhaustion during ambulation, as well as lim-ited mobility, pain, and a decreased range of motion (ROM) in lower limb joints.3,8 It has been reported that using a conventional KAFO reduces gait efficiency by 24%, increases vertical displacement of the center of mass (COM) by up to 65%, and also increases energy expendi-ture.9 Due to these factors, the rejection rate of using KAFOs in patients with muscular weakness of the lower limb due to conditions such as poliomyelitis, post-polio syndrome, CVA, CP, SCI, and MS has been reported as being between 60% and 100%.9
Stance control KAFOs (SCKAFOs) are a new genera-tion of KAFO which have been developed to prevent knee flexion during stance phase and permit free knee motion during swing phase of gait.10 Mechanical SCKAFOs are usually activated by ankle ROM mechanisms or limb incli-nation. The UTX, stance control orthosis (SCO) knee joint, swing phase lock (SPL), Horton, Otto Bock Free Walk, and the Otto Bock Sensor Walk are all examples of SCKAFOs.8,11
Using a SCKAFO produces an increased acceptance rate for wearing orthoses by patients with poliomyelitis, CP, CVA, and leg muscle weakness because of the ability to control knee flexion in stance and the provision of free knee flexion during swing phase of gait.3,8,12 Studies have demonstrated that velocity, cadence, stride length, and step length can increase when walking with a SCKAFO versus a locked knee KAFO.2,3,8,12 Irby et al.11 reported that KAFO users showed improvements in velocity, cadence, and stride length after 6 months of walking with the dynamic knee brace system (DKBS). SCKAFOs improve gait by encouraging more normal gait patterns, improving mobility, reducing the energy cost of walking, and reduc-ing compensatory strategies that may lead to chronic pain and loss of motion.2,12–14
Unfortunately, current commercial SCKAFOs are often noisy, bulky, heavy, and expensive and in some cases are not effective in improving kinematic variables and energy
expenditure. Davis et al.12 reported that there was no dif-ference in the energy cost of walking or physiological cost index (PCI) between a SCO and walking with the locked knee joint orthosis. Bernhardt et al.1 reported that it was slightly more difficult to sit down and stand up with the new SCKAFO. Zissimopoulos et al.8 showed that differ-ences in oxygen cost could not be detected between the auto and locked modes of a SCKAFO. Only one study ana-lyzed the engineering structure of this type of orthosis.15 The effects on all walking parameters while using this type of orthosis in comparison to a conventional KAFO are not clear. Therefore, the aim of this literature review was to summarize the research on walking parameters while using these orthoses in various patient groups.
Research questions
Energy expenditure and kinematic variables were used as a framework to define the following research questions:
•• With regard to energy expenditure: do subjects with quadriceps muscle weakness caused by different pathologies achieve reduced energy expenditure immediately and over time when using SCKAFOs compared with conventional KAFOs?
•• With regard to kinematic variables: do persons with quadriceps muscle weakness caused by different pathologies achieve a higher speed of walking, cadence, step length, knee ROM, reduced pelvic obliquity, and vertical and lateral displacement immediately and over time when using SCKAFOs compared with conventional KAFOs?
Method
Search strategy
An extensive electronic search was carried out through internationally published scholarly articles in Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ISI Web of Knowledge (from 1950 to 2013) with the selected key-words (Table 1): stance control knee joint orthosis, stance control knee ankle foot orthosis, energy consumption, and temporal spatial parameters. The aforementioned key-words were also searched in combination with lower limb weakness, poliomyelitis, post-polio syndrome, spinal cord
Table 1. Keywords and combinations of keywords used in the study based on population intervention comparison outcome method.
P: Population I: Intervention C: Comparison O: Outcome measure
Lower limb weakness, poliomyelitis, post-polio syndrome, SCI, MS, and CP
Stance control knee joint orthosis, SCKAFO
Conventional KAFOs
Energy consumption, speed of walking, cadence, step length, knee ROM, pelvic obliquity, vertical and lateral displacement
Rafiaei et al. 3
injury, multiple sclerosis, and cerebral palsy. Search by selected keywords was organized following the population intervention comparison outcome (PICO) model. In order to provide a specific selection of previous studies, differ-ent combinations of the topics can be made with the use of AND, OR, and NOT. To prepare a more accurate and com-prehensive search, the references of primary resultant arti-cles were also included to find more suitable articles. The strategy includes medical subject headings (MeSH) and text words.
The title and abstract of each individual study were screened by authors. The first criterion to select appropri-ate articles was whether the title has addressed the research questions of interest. The second step in acquiring propor-tional articles was performed based on the following criteria:
1. Studies which were considered for inclusion were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case–control trials, cohort studies, case series studies, and sin-gle-case studies.
2. The article was written in English.3. The study evaluated motorized (powered) or
mechanical SCO using over training time in polio-myelitis subjects.
4. The study investigated individuals with a lower limb weakness (poliomyelitis, post-polio, and SCI) and able-bodied subjects.
5. The main outcome measures of the article were balance, gait, energy consumption, kinetics, kine-matics, and tempo-spatial parameters.
The PICO was used to define the included studies. Figure 1 depicts the article selection procedure utilized. Ultimately, 18 studies were included in the review. All the subjects in these studies were persons with polio, post-polio, SCI patients, and able-bodied subjects.
Results
Table 2 summarizes the characteristics (participants, parameters, procedure, and results) of studies which evalu-ated SCOs compared to KAFO when worn during ambulation.
Research question 1: the energy efficiency of SCKAFOs
Interestingly, only three studies evaluated energy con-sumption in non-disabled subjects, subjects with lower limb pathology, and a patient with post-poliomyelitis when using a SCO.8,11,13 A trend to improved energy efficiency has been demonstrated in two studies (0.447 beats/min in using a SCO compared to 0.554 beats/min in locked KAFO, and 0.21 beats/min in using SCO compared to
0.25 beats/min in locked KAFO).8,13 However, one study reported an increased PCI when using a SCO compared to a locked KAFO (0.70 beats/min compared to 0.65 beats/min, respectively).11
Research question 2: the kinematic efficiency of SCKAFOs
Speed of walking. Typical walking speed has been reported as being 1.3 m/s during normal walking in healthy sub-jects.16 When using a powered SCO, this can reduce to only 0.57 m/s.16 The mean of this variable has been shown to be 1.18,8 0.82,2 0.8,13 0.59,11 0.63,20 1.04,3 and 0.6117 in various subjects when using a non-powered SCO for ambulation. Only three studies demonstrated an increase in walking speed compared to walking with a locked KAFO,8,11,12 while five studies reported a reduction in this parameter when wearing a SCO.3,16,17,19,20 An improve-ment in walking velocity has also been reported when
Google scholar =17ISI Web of Knowledge =12
Pub Med =18Science direct =14
Total= 61
Screening articles basedon inclusion criteria
32 articles acceptedin
quality assessment of papers
18 accepted articlescarefully considered to
fulfill the criteria
Figure 1. The article selection procedure utilized in this study.
4 Prosthetics and Orthotics International
Tab
le 2
. T
he c
hara
cter
istic
s (p
artic
ipan
ts, p
aram
eter
s, p
roce
dure
, and
res
ults
) of
stu
dies
tha
t ev
alua
ted
the
stan
ce c
ontr
ol o
rtho
sis
on k
nee–
ankl
e–fo
ot o
rtho
sis
user
s.
Ref
.M
etho
dR
esul
ts
Par
tici
pant
sP
aram
eter
sP
roce
dure
Ara
zpou
r
et a
l. (2
013)
16
Five
hea
lthy
subj
ects
of
mea
n ag
e of
26
± 5
.6 ye
ars,
w
eigh
t of
66
± 3
.8 k
g, a
nd
heig
ht o
f 176
± 4
.6 cm
pa
rtic
ipat
ed in
thi
s st
udy.
Gai
t an
alys
is: h
oriz
onta
l an
d ve
rtic
al e
xcur
sion
s of
th
e hi
ps, m
axim
um k
nee
flexi
on a
ngle
, spa
tio-
tem
pora
l gai
t pa
ram
eter
s.
Late
ral a
nd v
ertic
al
com
pens
ator
y m
otio
n
Gai
t da
ta w
ere
acqu
ired
in a
mot
ion
anal
ysis
labo
rato
ry u
sing
a c
alib
rate
d si
x-ca
mer
a vi
deo-
base
d m
otio
n an
alys
is.
Wal
king
tri
als
wer
e ra
ndom
ly p
erfo
rmed
in
thr
ee t
est
cond
ition
s: n
orm
al w
alki
ng
with
out
an o
rtho
sis,
wal
king
with
a
conv
entio
nal K
AFO
uni
late
rally
, and
als
o w
ith a
new
pow
ered
KA
FO a
pplie
d to
th
e sa
me
leg.
The
mea
ns o
f wal
king
spe
ed (
conv
entio
nal
KA
FO =
0.7
8 ±
0.0
29 m
/s, n
ew p
ower
ed
KA
FO =
0.5
7 ±
0.0
34 m
/s),
cade
nce
(con
vent
iona
l K
AFO
= 8
1 ±
5 s
teps
/min
, new
pow
ered
K
AFO
= 6
8 ±
3 s
teps
/min
), an
d kn
ee fl
exio
n du
ring
sw
ing
(con
vent
iona
l KA
FO =
6.6
° ± 0
.89°
, ne
w p
ower
ed K
AFO
= 4
0.2°
± 1
.30°
) an
d st
ep
leng
th (
conv
entio
nal K
AFO
= 0
.57
± 0
.019
cm,
new
pow
ered
KA
FO =
0.5
0 ±
0.0
40 cm
) w
ere
all d
ecre
ased
. Lat
eral
com
pens
ator
y m
otio
ns
(con
vent
iona
l KA
FO =
8.2
± 0
.63
cm, n
ew p
ower
ed
KA
FO =
5.8
± 0
.22
cm)
and
vert
ical
com
pens
ator
y m
otio
ns (
conv
entio
nal K
AFO
= 9
.8 ±
0.5
5 cm
, new
po
wer
ed K
AFO
= 7
.1 ±
0.2
3 cm
) w
ere
incr
ease
d by
bo
th o
rtho
ses
com
pare
d to
nor
mal
wal
king
. Mor
e kn
ee
flexi
on w
as o
bser
ved
in b
oth
swin
g an
d st
ance
pha
ses
whe
n w
alki
ng w
ith t
he p
ower
ed K
AFO
com
pare
d to
th
e co
nven
tiona
l KA
FO.
Ara
zpou
r
et a
l. (2
013)
17A
54-
year
-old
mal
e su
bjec
t su
fferi
ng fr
om
polio
mye
litis
.
Spee
d of
wal
king
, ste
p le
ngth
, tot
al r
ange
of
late
ral c
ompe
nsat
ory
mot
ion,
tot
al r
ange
of
vert
ical
com
pens
ator
y m
otio
n w
ere
all e
valu
ated
.
A m
otio
n an
alys
is s
yste
m w
as u
sed
to c
olle
ct lo
wer
lim
b ki
nem
atic
s. T
he
pers
on w
ith p
olio
mye
litis
use
d th
e K
AFO
with
pow
ered
kne
e jo
ints
for
wal
king
the
rapy
and
gai
t tr
aini
ng.
Wal
king
spe
ed (
conv
entio
nal K
AFO
= 0
.85
± 0
.06
m/s
, ne
w p
ower
ed K
AFO
= 0
.61
± 0
.04
m/s
), st
ep
leng
th (
conv
entio
nal K
AFO
= 0
.66
± 0
.05
m, n
ew
pow
ered
KA
FO =
0.5
2 ±
0.0
3 m
), an
d ve
rtic
al
(con
vent
iona
l KA
FO =
9.8
± 0
.04
cm, n
ew p
ower
ed
KA
FO =
7.2
± 0
.02
cm)
and
hori
zont
al d
ispl
acem
ent
of t
he p
elvi
s (c
onve
ntio
nal K
AFO
= 8
.6 ±
0.0
6 cm
, ne
w p
ower
ed K
AFO
= 5
.8 ±
0.0
4 cm
) de
crea
sed
whe
n w
alki
ng w
ith t
he p
ower
ed S
CK
AFO
com
pare
d to
the
K
AFO
. Whe
n us
ing
the
pow
ered
SC
KA
FO, t
he k
nee
flexi
on a
chie
ved
duri
ng s
win
g an
d al
so t
he o
vera
ll pa
tter
n of
wal
king
mor
e cl
osel
y m
atch
ed w
ith t
hat
of
norm
al h
uman
wal
king
. The
red
uced
wal
king
spe
ed
may
hav
e ca
used
the
sm
alle
r co
mpe
nsat
ory
mot
ions
de
tect
ed w
hen
the
pow
ered
SC
KA
FO w
as u
sed
Rafiaei et al. 5
Ref
.M
etho
dR
esul
ts
Par
tici
pant
sP
aram
eter
sP
roce
dure
To
et a
l. (2
012)
18A
70-
kg m
an w
ith
T-9
, ASI
A A
cla
ss S
CI
cons
ente
d to
par
ticip
ate
in t
his
stud
y.
Spat
ial-t
empo
ral
and
kine
mat
ics
gait
para
met
ers.
A m
otio
n an
alys
is s
yste
m w
as u
sed.
T
he u
pper
lim
b lo
ads
appl
ied
to t
he
wal
ker
duri
ng g
ait
with
the
HN
P w
ere
com
pare
d w
ith t
hree
con
trol
cas
es:
wal
king
with
(a)
FN
S on
ly; (
b) IR
GO
on
ly, w
ith h
ips
reci
proc
ally
cou
pled
, kn
ees
lock
ed in
ext
ensi
on, a
nd a
nkle
s lo
cked
at
neut
ral;
and
(c)
IRG
O w
ith
hips
rec
ipro
cally
cou
pled
, kne
es fr
eed
(i.e.
, dro
p lo
cks
of t
he s
tand
ard
KA
FO
unla
tche
d), a
nkle
s lo
cked
at
neut
ral,
and
join
ts d
rive
n by
pre
prog
ram
med
mus
cle
stim
ulat
ion
patt
ern.
The
HN
P re
duce
d th
e av
erag
e ve
rtic
al u
pper
lim
b fo
rces
on
the
wal
king
aid
. The
HN
P w
as a
lso
capa
ble
of r
educ
ing
the
stim
ulat
ion
duty
cyc
le o
f the
kne
e ex
tens
or m
uscl
es. T
he a
dditi
onal
mas
s an
d in
tern
al
fric
tion
of t
he S
CK
M w
as s
how
n to
hav
e m
inim
al
effe
ct o
n kn
ee a
ngle
tra
ject
ory
duri
ng s
win
g. T
hese
re
sults
sho
w t
hat
the
HN
P ca
n si
gnifi
cant
ly r
educ
e th
e us
er’s
upp
er li
mb
load
ing
and
the
amou
nt o
f m
uscl
e st
imul
atio
n, p
oten
tially
ena
blin
g in
divi
dual
s w
ith
para
pleg
ia t
o w
alk
long
er d
ista
nces
and
with
less
effo
rt
than
with
eith
er b
raci
ng o
r FN
S al
one.
Bern
hard
t
et a
l. (2
011)
19N
ine
subj
ects
(7
mal
es,
2 fe
mal
es, a
vera
ge a
ge:
61 ±
9 ye
ars)
with
incl
usio
n bo
dy m
yosi
tis.
Kin
emat
ic p
aram
eter
s,
velo
city
, cad
ence
, and
st
ep w
idth
wer
e ev
alua
ted
in t
his
stud
y.
All
patie
nts
had
obje
ctiv
e te
stin
g of
th
eir
stre
ngth
and
gai
t an
d co
mpl
eted
a
ques
tionn
aire
at
base
line
in 6
mon
ths.
Su
bjec
ts w
ere
fitte
d w
ith a
Sen
sor
Wal
k (O
tto
Bock
Hea
lth C
are,
Min
neap
olis
, M
N)
SCO
by
a ce
rtifi
ed o
rtho
tist.
Gai
t w
as a
sses
sed
usin
g a
10-c
amer
a m
otio
n an
alys
is s
yste
m a
nd fo
ur fo
rce
plat
form
s.
Gai
t an
alys
is w
as p
erfo
rmed
bot
h w
ith
and
with
out
the
orth
osis
.
Vel
ocity
(p
= 0
.025
) an
d ca
denc
e (p
= 0
.007
) w
ere
low
er a
nd s
tep
wid
th w
as h
ighe
r (p
= 0
.035
) w
ith t
he
SCO
tha
n w
hen
usin
g an
alte
rnat
ive
orth
osis
. The
re
was
sig
nific
ant
diffe
renc
e (p
= 0
.021
) on
pea
k kn
ee
flexi
on b
etw
een
unbr
aced
con
ditio
n an
d w
alki
ng w
ith
SCO
(un
brac
ed =
74.
4°. S
CO
= 6
2.9°
), bu
t th
ere
was
no
sig
nific
ant
diffe
renc
e (p
= 0
.355
) be
twee
n un
brac
ed
cond
ition
and
wal
king
with
SC
O in
pea
k hi
p fle
xion
).
Dav
is e
t al
. (2
010)
12T
wen
ty-o
ne s
ubje
cts
(15
mal
es; 6
fem
ales
) w
ith w
eak
or a
bsen
t qu
adri
ceps
. The
ave
rage
ag
e w
as 5
3 +
15
year
s an
d bo
dy m
ass
indi
ces
(BM
Is)
rang
ed fr
om 1
9 to
40.
Spat
io-t
empo
ral,
kine
mat
ic, a
nd k
inet
ic
para
met
ers.
Com
pari
son
betw
een
novi
ce a
nd
expe
rien
ced
user
s th
at u
se D
KBS
, an
elec
trom
echa
nica
l rel
ease
, and
sen
sors
at
the
kne
e an
d fo
otpl
ate,
all
fit t
o a
conv
entio
nal K
AFO
. Obj
ectiv
e ga
it m
easu
rem
ents
wer
e ac
quir
ed w
ith
a m
otio
n an
alys
is s
yste
m u
tiliz
ing
10
infr
ared
cam
eras
.
Nov
ice
user
s de
mon
stra
ted
incr
ease
d ve
loci
ty (
from
55
.3 t
o 59
.0 m
/s)
and
cade
nce
(from
86.
3 to
99.
2 st
eps/
min
) w
hen
usin
g th
e D
KBS
ove
r th
e tr
aditi
onal
lock
ed
KA
FO. E
xper
ienc
ed K
AFO
use
rs t
ende
d to
hav
e re
duce
d ve
loci
ty a
nd c
aden
ce m
easu
res
whe
n us
ing
the
SCO
. Kne
e R
OM
was
sig
nific
antly
gre
ater
for
the
novi
ce g
roup
tha
n fo
r th
e ex
peri
ence
d gr
oup.
Pea
k kn
ee e
xten
sion
mom
ents
ten
ded
to b
e gr
eate
r fo
r th
e ex
peri
ence
d gr
oup.
Yak
imov
ich
et
al.
(200
6)20
Thr
ee m
ale
KA
FO u
sers
w
ith k
nee
exte
nsor
w
eakn
ess
(mea
n ag
e:
56.3
year
s).
Spat
io-t
empo
ral a
nd
kine
mat
ics.
Thr
ee w
alki
ng t
rial
s w
ere
perf
orm
ed
with
the
sub
ject
s’ c
urre
nt K
AFO
and
th
en t
he n
ew S
CK
AFO
(no
n-ra
ndom
ized
be
fore
-aft
er t
rial
). Su
bjec
ts c
ompl
eted
a
ques
tionn
aire
abo
ut t
he n
ew S
CK
AFO
an
d cu
rren
t K
AFO
.
Incr
ease
d kn
ee fl
exio
n du
ring
sw
ing
(KA
FO w
ith lo
cked
kn
ee jo
int =
7.9
° an
d SC
KA
FO =
29.
03°)
, a g
reat
er t
otal
kn
ee R
OM
in n
ew S
CK
AFO
use
rs a
nd im
prov
ed g
ait
kine
mat
ics
and
prov
ided
mor
e na
tura
l gai
t.
(Con
tinue
d)
Tab
le 2
. (C
ontin
ued)
6 Prosthetics and Orthotics International
Ref
.M
etho
dR
esul
ts
Par
tici
pant
sP
aram
eter
sP
roce
dure
Yak
imov
ich
et
al.
(200
6)14
Thr
ee h
ealth
y ad
ults
(m
ale;
age
, 35
.3 ±
19.
7 ye
ars)
and
th
ree
KA
FO u
sers
with
kn
ee e
xten
sor
wea
knes
s in
at
leas
t on
e lim
b (m
ale;
m
ean
age,
56.
3 ye
ars)
.
Kin
emat
ics:
kne
e fle
xion
an
d to
tal k
nee
RO
M,
pelv
ic o
bliq
uity
, and
hip
ab
duct
ion
angl
e.
Eval
uatio
n of
a n
ew e
lect
rom
echa
nica
l SC
KA
FO a
nd c
ompa
red
to t
heir
pr
escr
ibed
KA
FO d
urin
g ga
it.
KA
FO u
sers
had
a m
ean
incr
ease
in k
nee
flexi
on
of 2
1.1°
(SD
= 8
.2)
duri
ng s
win
g, a
nd a
gre
ater
tot
al
knee
RO
M w
hen
wal
king
with
the
new
SC
KA
FO
com
pare
d to
the
ir p
resc
ribe
d K
AFO
. Tw
o K
AFO
use
rs
expe
rien
ced
a re
duct
ion
in p
elvi
c ob
liqui
ty a
nd h
ip
abdu
ctio
n an
gle
abno
rmal
ities
whe
n w
alki
ng w
ith t
he
SCK
AFO
com
pare
d to
the
ir p
resc
ribe
d K
AFO
.
Hw
ang
et a
l. (2
008)
21
Four
fem
ale
polio
mye
litis
pa
tient
s w
ere
sele
cted
as
exp
erim
enta
l sub
ject
s.
The
ir m
ean
age,
hei
ght,
and
wei
ght
wer
e as
fo
llow
s: 3
7 ±
4.8
year
s,
159
± 6
.4 cm
, and
56
± 9
.7 k
g, r
espe
ctiv
ely
and
all s
ubje
cts
wer
e un
ilate
ral K
AFO
use
rs.
Spat
io-t
empo
ral
gait
para
met
ers
and
kine
mat
ics
incl
uded
: kn
ee fl
exio
n an
gles
. Tw
o fo
rce
plat
es w
ere
used
to
mea
sure
gro
und
reac
tion
forc
es.
A g
ait
anal
ysis
was
per
form
ed o
n ea
ch
subj
ect
usin
g a
thre
e-di
men
sion
al (
3-D
) m
otio
n an
alys
is s
yste
m w
ith s
ix in
frar
ed
cam
eras
and
tw
o fo
rce
plat
es in
ord
er
to c
ompa
re g
ait
patt
erns
in t
wo
orth
otic
co
nditi
ons:
an
elec
trom
echa
nica
l K
AFO
with
the
lock
ed k
nee
(wal
king
w
ith a
KA
FO w
ith t
he c
lutc
h lo
cked
ov
er t
he w
hole
per
iod
of t
he g
ait
cycl
e), a
nd c
ontr
olle
d kn
ee g
ait
(wal
king
with
a K
AFO
with
the
clu
tch
elec
trom
echa
nica
lly c
ontr
olle
d).
All
subj
ects
had
con
side
rabl
y hi
gher
max
imum
kne
e fle
xion
dur
ing
swin
g ph
ase
for
cont
rolle
d kn
ee g
ait
(lock
ed K
AFO
= 2
.9°
and
cont
rolle
d K
AFO
= 3
2.6°
). T
he
patt
ern
of p
elvi
c ob
liqui
ty d
urin
g co
ntro
lled
knee
gai
t w
as v
ery
sim
ilar
to n
orm
al g
ait,
but
ther
e w
ere
som
e de
viat
ions
. The
re w
ere
no s
igni
fican
t di
ffere
nces
in
hear
t ra
te a
nd m
inut
e ve
ntila
tion.
Thi
s re
sulte
d in
app
roxi
mat
ely
33%
less
ene
rgy
cons
umpt
ion
than
in lo
cked
kne
e ga
it. It
pro
vide
d bo
th
stab
ility
in t
he s
tanc
e an
d fr
ee s
win
ging
of t
he k
nee.
Ras
mus
sen
et
al.
(200
7)10
A
pat
ient
with
a T
10 S
CI
(30-
year
-old
man
)Sp
atio
-tem
pora
l gai
t pa
ram
eter
s.
Kin
emat
ic: t
runk
flex
ion/
exte
nsio
n, la
tera
l fle
xion
, an
d ro
tatio
n.
Excu
rsio
n, h
ip, a
nd k
nee
flexi
on/e
xten
sion
RO
M.
A 3
-D g
ait
anal
ysis
was
use
d.
The
aut
hors
rep
ort
the
use
of S
CK
AFO
s in
com
bina
tion
with
an
IRG
O. A
co
mpa
riso
n is
mad
e be
twee
n th
e sc
enar
ios
of h
avin
g th
e kn
ees
lock
ed
duri
ng t
he e
ntir
e ga
it cy
cle
to t
hat
of
allo
win
g th
e kn
ees
to fl
ex fr
eely
dur
ing
the
swin
g ph
ase,
yet
stil
l be
lock
ed fo
r st
abili
ty d
urin
g st
ance
.
The
add
ition
of s
tanc
e co
ntro
l to
an IR
GO
in t
his
subj
ect
doub
led
his
wal
king
spe
ed (
IRG
O w
ith lo
cked
kn
ee jo
ints
= 0
.11
± 0
.04
m/s
and
IRG
O w
ith S
C k
nee
join
ts =
0.2
3 ±
0.0
2 m
/s)
and
stri
de le
ngth
(IR
GO
with
lo
cked
kne
e jo
ints
= 0
.44
± 0
.27
m a
nd IR
GO
with
SC
kn
ee jo
ints
= 0
.92
± 0
.05
m)
with
a s
light
red
uctio
n in
ca
denc
e (IR
GO
with
lock
ed k
nee
join
ts =
38.
4 ±
17.
6 st
eps/
min
and
IRG
O w
ith S
C k
nee
join
ts =
30.
37 ±
1.3
2 st
eps/
min
) so
tha
t th
is is
mor
e in
line
with
the
leng
th o
f hi
s st
ride
s. T
he s
ubje
ct a
mbu
late
d w
ith a
fast
er, m
ore
effic
ient
gai
t pa
tter
n w
ith t
he s
tanc
e co
ntro
l fea
ture
ac
tivat
ed. T
his
orth
otic
opt
ion
affo
rded
him
the
abi
lity
to w
alk
safe
ly a
nd s
moo
thly
with
bot
h kn
ees
flexi
ng
duri
ng s
win
g an
d w
ith le
ss u
pper
bod
y co
mpe
nsat
ion.
Tab
le 2
. (C
ontin
ued)
Rafiaei et al. 7
Ref
.M
etho
dR
esul
ts
Par
tici
pant
sP
aram
eter
sP
roce
dure
Zis
sim
opou
los
et a
l. (2
007)
8
Nin
e ab
le-b
odie
d (fi
ve
fem
ales
and
four
mal
es).
Subj
ects
had
a m
ean
age
25 ±
2 ye
ars.
Spat
io-t
empo
ral d
ata.
Kin
emat
ic d
ata:
ank
le
dors
iflex
ion,
kne
e fle
xion
, an
d pe
lvic
obl
iqui
ty.
Ener
gy e
xpen
ditu
re
para
met
ers.
Subj
ects
wal
ked
with
KA
FOs
that
in
corp
orat
ed t
he H
orto
ns s
tanc
e co
ntro
l ort
hotic
kne
e jo
int
(SC
OK
J) in
th
e lo
cked
, unl
ocke
d, a
nd a
uto
mod
es
to in
vest
igat
e th
e bi
omec
hani
cal a
nd
ener
getic
effe
cts
of S
CO
s. T
he s
tudy
co
nsis
ted
of t
hree
sta
ges:
fabr
icat
ion,
dy
nam
ic a
djus
tmen
t an
d tr
aini
ng,
and
data
col
lect
ion.
For
the
ene
rgy
expe
nditu
re e
valu
atio
n, d
ata
wer
e co
llect
ed w
ith a
Cos
med
K4b
2 po
rtab
le
spir
omet
er o
n tr
eadm
ill. G
ait
anal
ysis
da
ta w
ere
proc
esse
d w
ith m
otio
n an
alys
is s
yste
m.
Gai
t ki
nem
atic
s fo
r th
e au
to a
nd u
nloc
ked
mod
es w
ere
mor
e si
mila
r th
an fo
r th
e au
to a
nd lo
cked
mod
es.
Oxy
gen
cost
was
not
diff
eren
t be
twee
n th
e au
to a
nd
lock
ed m
odes
(p
> 0
.99)
.
Irby
et
al.
(200
7)2
14 r
esea
rch
part
icip
ants
(1
1 m
ales
; 3 fe
mal
es).
Nin
e re
sear
ch p
artic
ipan
ts
had
polio
whi
le t
he
rem
aini
ng p
atie
nts
had
othe
r pa
thol
ogie
s or
tra
uma
incl
udin
g ne
urop
athi
es, i
ncom
plet
e SC
Is, s
pina
bifi
da, M
S,
and
mus
cula
r dy
stro
phy.
A
vera
ge a
ge w
as
51 +
17
year
s.
Spat
io-t
empo
ral
kine
mat
ics:
pel
vic
obliq
uity
, hip
flex
ion,
hi
p ex
tens
ion,
and
hip
ab
duct
ion.
Kin
etic
s: p
eak
cont
rala
tera
l hip
ab
duct
ion
in s
win
g an
d ip
sila
tera
l ext
ensi
on
mom
ents
dur
ing
stan
ce,
aver
age
knee
ext
enso
r m
omen
ts d
urin
g st
ance
, kn
ee m
omen
t at
foot
-off,
an
d pe
ak c
ontr
alat
eral
an
kle
plan
tarf
lexi
on
mom
ent
duri
ng s
tanc
e.
A m
otio
n an
alys
is s
yste
m (
DK
BS)
was
use
d du
ring
a p
rosp
ectiv
e op
en-
enro
llmen
t 6-
mon
th c
linic
al fi
eld
tria
l.
The
“ex
peri
ence
d” g
roup
rou
tinel
y us
ed
a lo
cked
KA
FO fo
r am
bula
tion.
The
“n
ovic
e” g
roup
had
bee
n pr
escr
ibed
but
di
d no
t re
gula
rly
use
a lo
cked
KA
FO fo
r am
bula
tion.
Wal
king
vel
ocity
(be
fore
= 7
9 ±
19
m/s
and
aft
er
6 m
onth
s = 8
2 ±
16
m/s
), ca
denc
e (b
efor
e =
78
± 1
3 st
eps/
min
and
aft
er 6
mon
ths =
83
± 8
ste
ps/m
in),
and
stri
de le
ngth
(be
fore
= 1
07 ±
18
cm a
nd a
fter
6
mon
ths =
117
± 1
5 cm
) in
crea
sed
at t
he in
itial
tes
t to
6
mon
ths.
Sing
le-li
mb
supp
ort
time
rem
aine
d un
chan
ged
thro
ugho
ut t
his
field
tri
al.
Res
ults
sho
wed
tha
t al
l sub
ject
s si
gnifi
cant
ly in
crea
sed
peak
kne
e fle
xion
bet
wee
n th
e in
itial
and
6-m
onth
tes
ts
(bef
ore
= 4
9.0
± 1
5.5°
and
aft
er 6
mon
ths =
55.
9° ±
11.
4°).
(Con
tinue
d)
Tab
le 2
. (C
ontin
ued)
8 Prosthetics and Orthotics International
Ref
.M
etho
dR
esul
ts
Par
tici
pant
sP
aram
eter
sP
roce
dure
Bern
hard
t et
al.
(200
6)1
20 s
ubje
cts
(14
mal
es; 6
fe
mal
es).
The
maj
ority
of
the
par
ticip
ants
w
ere
affe
cted
by
polio
(1
2/20
), bu
t di
agno
ses
also
incl
uded
inco
mpl
ete
SCI,
MS,
indu
stri
al o
r ot
her
inju
ry, s
pina
bifi
da,
mus
cula
r dy
stro
phy,
in
clus
ive
body
myo
sitis
, an
d w
eakn
ess
of u
nkno
wn
orig
in. T
he a
ge o
f the
re
sear
ch p
artic
ipan
ts
was
53.
2 +
14.
8 (r
ange
: 11
–76)
yea
rs, w
ith a
BM
I of 2
8.7
+ 6
.1 (
rang
e:
19.2
–40.
1.
Gai
t an
alys
is c
once
ntra
ted
on o
rtho
sis
activ
ities
suc
h as
don
ning
and
dof
fing
the
orth
osis
, ass
umin
g a
sitt
ing
or s
tand
ing
posi
tion,
us
e of
ass
istiv
e de
vice
s,
orth
osis
aes
thet
ics,
st
abili
ty d
urin
g w
alki
ng a
nd
stan
ding
, wal
king
abi
lity
over
dis
tanc
e an
d va
riou
s te
rrai
n, a
nd s
elf-r
epor
ted
daily
use
of t
he o
rtho
sis.
Ph
ysic
al e
xam
inat
ion
incl
udin
g bi
late
ral l
ower
lim
b st
reng
th a
nd R
OM
, an
d a
func
tiona
l 6-m
in
wal
k te
st.
Thi
s st
udy
was
a c
ompo
nent
of a
n ov
eral
l pro
ject
des
ign
incl
udin
g 6
mon
ths
at h
ome
field
tri
al o
f the
DK
BS, w
ith
labo
rato
ry t
estin
g at
tim
es 0
, 3, a
nd
6 m
onth
s. P
artic
ipan
ts w
ere
free
to
choo
se b
etw
een
the
DK
BS a
nd t
heir
pe
rson
al o
rtho
sis
duri
ng t
he t
rial
.
Stab
ility
whi
le s
tand
ing
and
wal
king
with
the
DK
BS w
as
rate
d as
acc
epta
ble
to e
xcel
lent
and
slig
htly
bet
ter
than
ot
her
brac
es. I
t w
as s
light
ly m
ore
diffi
cult
to s
it do
wn
and
stan
d up
with
the
DK
BS. T
his
stud
y sh
ows
that
w
eari
ng a
sta
nce
cont
rol k
nee
orth
osis
can
be
a po
sitiv
e ex
peri
ence
for
an o
rtho
sis
user
.
Ferr
is e
t al
. (2
006)
22A
71-
year
-old
pol
io
patie
nt.
Tem
pora
l and
spa
tial g
ait
char
acte
rist
ics
Thi
s ca
se s
tudy
out
lined
the
suc
cess
ful
pres
crip
tion
of a
KA
FO t
hat
inco
rpor
ated
a s
tanc
e co
ntro
l kne
e jo
int
(E-K
nee,
Bec
ker
Ort
hope
dic,
USA
).
Thi
s ca
se s
tudy
out
lined
the
suc
cess
ful p
resc
ript
ion
of
a K
AFO
tha
t in
corp
orat
ed a
sta
nce
cont
rol k
nee
join
t (E
-Kne
e, B
ecke
r O
rtho
pedi
c, U
SA).
It a
lso
outli
ned
how
th
e us
e of
ort
hotic
dia
gnos
tic t
ools
aid
pre
scri
ptio
n an
d de
mon
stra
te im
prov
emen
ts in
tem
pora
l and
spa
tial g
ait
char
acte
rist
ics
with
SC
KA
FO.
Irby
et
al.
(200
5)11
10 s
ubje
cts
(low
er li
mb
path
olog
y)En
ergy
exp
endi
ture
and
sp
atio
-tem
pora
l gai
t ch
arac
teri
stic
s w
ere
mea
sure
d in
thi
s st
udy.
A G
ait
Rite
wal
kway
was
use
d to
mea
sure
tem
poro
spat
ial g
ait
char
acte
rist
ics.
A C
osm
ed K
4b2
port
able
m
etab
olic
sys
tem
was
use
d to
mea
sure
en
ergy
exp
endi
ture
and
hea
rt r
ate
duri
ng w
alki
ng. T
wo
cond
ition
s w
ere
test
ed: w
alki
ng w
ith s
tanc
e co
ntro
l act
ive
(Hor
tons
SC
O)
and
wal
king
with
the
kn
ee jo
int
lock
ed.
Wal
king
vel
ocity
was
sig
nific
antly
incr
ease
d in
the
st
ance
con
trol
con
ditio
n (S
CK
AFO
= 7
2.9
± 2
5.7
cm/s
an
d lo
cked
KA
FO =
65.
0 ±
24.
5 cm
/s).
The
re
was
no
diffe
renc
e in
the
oxy
gen
cost
of w
alki
ng
(SC
KA
FO =
0.2
13 ±
0.0
81 m
L/kg
/min
and
lock
ed
KA
FO =
0.2
24 ±
0.0
69 m
L/kg
/min
) or
PC
I bet
wee
n co
nditi
ons
(SC
KA
FO =
0.6
5 ±
0.3
2 be
ats/
min
and
lock
ed
KA
FO =
0.7
0 ±
0.3
4 be
ats/
min
).
Yak
imov
ich
et
al.
(200
5)9
Thr
ee a
ble-
bodi
ed
subj
ects
and
thr
ee K
AFO
us
ers.
Kin
emat
ic g
ait
anal
ysis
.A
n ev
alua
tion
of a
n el
ectr
omec
hani
cal
SCK
AFO
con
duct
ed t
o de
term
ine
its
func
tiona
l and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s du
ring
gai
t.
The
SC
KA
FO p
erm
itted
a m
ean
incr
ease
in s
agitt
al
knee
mot
ion
duri
ng s
win
g fo
r th
e th
ree
KA
FO u
sers
an
d a
redu
ctio
n in
pel
vic
obliq
uity
and
hip
abd
uctio
n an
gle
abno
rmal
ities
dur
ing
term
inal
sta
nce
and
swin
g fo
r tw
o K
AFO
use
rs.
Tab
le 2
. (C
ontin
ued)
Rafiaei et al. 9
Ref
.M
etho
dR
esul
ts
Par
tici
pant
sP
aram
eter
sP
roce
dure
Heb
ert
and
Ligg
ins
(200
5)13
A 6
1-ye
ar-o
ld m
ale
volu
ntee
r w
ith p
ost-
polio
mye
litis
Kin
emat
ic a
nd k
inet
ic
gait
anal
yses
and
PC
I in
the
lock
ed k
nee
and
stan
ce c
ontr
ol m
odes
. El
ectr
omyo
grap
hic
data
w
ere
reco
rded
from
the
no
n-br
aced
lim
b on
ly b
y us
ing
a su
rfac
e el
ectr
ode
syst
em.
The
sub
ject
was
fitt
ed w
ith a
rig
ht
KA
FO w
ith a
n au
tom
atic
Hor
tons
sta
nce
cont
rol k
nee
join
t th
at a
llow
ed fr
ee
flexi
on o
f the
kne
e in
the
sw
ing
phas
e,
with
aut
omat
ic lo
ckin
g of
the
kne
e at
the
in
itiat
ion
of s
tanc
e ph
ase.
Inst
rum
ente
d ga
it an
alys
is w
as c
ondu
cted
6 m
onth
s af
ter
the
patie
nt r
ecei
ved
the
new
K
AFO
. All
data
typ
es w
ere
reco
rded
si
mul
tane
ousl
y du
ring
eac
h of
tw
o am
bula
tory
con
ditio
ns: w
alki
ng w
ith t
he
brac
e in
lock
ed k
nee
mod
e an
d th
en in
au
tom
atic
sta
nce
cont
rol m
ode.
Impr
oved
gai
t bi
omec
hani
cs in
use
of s
tanc
e co
ntro
l m
ode
com
pare
d w
ith a
lock
ed m
ode.
The
re w
as a
tr
end
tow
ard
impr
oved
ene
rgy
effic
ienc
y in
the
sta
nce
cont
rol m
ode
vers
us t
he lo
cked
kne
e m
ode.
McM
illan
et
al.
(200
4)3
Thr
ee s
ubje
cts
with
lo
wer
lim
b w
eakn
ess.
Su
bjec
t 1
was
a 5
6-ye
ar-
old
man
with
pos
t-po
lio
synd
rom
e w
ho h
ad w
orn
a K
AFO
with
the
SC
OK
J fo
r 2
year
s. S
ubje
ct 2
was
a
59-y
ear-
old
man
with
po
st-p
olio
syn
drom
e w
ho
had
wor
n th
e SC
OK
J K
AFO
for
6 w
eeks
and
Su
bjec
t 3
was
a 3
0-ye
ar-
old
mal
e w
ith a
ner
ve
root
inju
ry (
L4 le
vel)
seco
ndar
y to
tra
uma.
Spat
io-t
empo
ral
para
met
ers:
wal
king
sp
eed,
cad
ence
str
ide,
and
st
ep le
ngth
.
Kin
emat
ics:
kne
e fle
xion
/ex
tens
ion,
hip
, pel
vic,
and
tr
unk
mov
emen
t.
Hea
rt r
ate
All
thre
e su
bjec
ts c
ompl
eted
gai
t an
alys
is, t
hen
obst
acle
cou
rse
tria
ls, t
hen
trea
dmill
tri
als
with
in 1
day
, tak
ing
a br
eak
befo
re t
read
mill
tri
als
to r
est
and
eat
to d
eter
min
e w
heth
er in
divi
dual
s w
ith lo
wer
lim
b w
eakn
ess
wal
k m
ore
effic
ient
ly w
hen
usin
g th
e SC
OK
J tha
n w
hen
usin
g a
conv
entio
nal K
AFO
with
th
e kn
ee lo
cked
in e
xten
sion
.
Impr
oved
tem
poro
spat
ial p
aram
eter
s w
hen
wal
king
w
ith S
CO
KJ w
as n
oted
. Inc
reas
ed s
peed
and
ca
denc
e, in
crea
sed
stri
de a
nd s
tep
leng
ths,
and
few
er
com
pens
ator
y m
ovem
ents
at
the
hip,
pel
vis,
and
tru
nk
whe
n w
alki
ng w
ith t
he S
CO
KJ t
han
whe
n w
alki
ng
with
the
con
vent
iona
l KA
FO w
as n
oted
. Tw
o su
bjec
ts
show
ed lo
wer
ene
rgy
expe
nditu
re w
hen
wal
king
with
th
e SC
OK
J.
Tok
uhar
a
et a
l. (2
000)
23T
wo
post
-pol
io s
yndr
ome
patie
nts.
Sub
ject
1 (
S1)
was
a w
oman
(42
year
s ol
d). S
ubje
ct 2
(S2
) w
as a
m
ale
(46
year
s ol
d).
Kin
emat
ics:
ank
le a
nd
knee
join
t an
gles
, sha
nk
rate
vel
ocity
, foo
t ta
ngen
tial a
ccel
erat
ion,
an
d ac
tivat
ion
peri
od.
Each
KA
FO c
ould
be
adap
ted
to t
est
two
diffe
rent
con
ditio
ns: (
a) c
ontr
ol
by d
orsi
flexi
on (
CD
) an
d (2
) cy
clic
al
cont
rolle
r (C
C).
Five
wal
king
tri
als
(ass
iste
d by
cru
tche
s) t
hrou
gh a
10
m
path
wer
e pe
rfor
med
.
The
res
ults
from
imm
edia
te in
spec
tion
indi
cate
an
impo
rtan
t im
prov
emen
t of
the
gai
t pa
tter
ns (
knee
fle
xion
in s
win
g in
sub
ject
1 =
50°
± 3
° an
d in
sub
ject
2
= 6
1° ±
3°)
in t
wo
patie
nts
with
pro
xim
al le
g w
eakn
ess
by m
eans
of c
ompe
nsat
ions
app
lied
by t
he w
eara
ble
orth
osis
.
SCK
M: s
tanc
e co
ntro
l kne
e m
echa
nism
; FN
S: fu
nctio
nal n
euro
mus
cula
r st
imul
atio
n; H
NP:
hyb
rid
neur
opro
sthe
sis;
IRG
O: i
soce
ntri
c re
cipr
ocat
ing
gait
orth
osis
.
Tab
le 2
. (C
ontin
ued)
10 Prosthetics and Orthotics International
using a stance control knee joint compared to drop locked knee joint in wearing an RGO in SCI patients (0.12 and 0.23 m/s).10,18
Cadence. Six studies noted an increase in cadence during walking with a SCO compared to walking with locked KAFO.2,3,8,11,12,21 However, Hebert et al. when using an automatic SCO and Arazpour et al. when using a powered KAFO both detected a reduction in this parameter com-pared to walking with locked KAFOs.13,16 Using a SCO associated with an RGO caused a reduction in this param-eter in SCI patients.10 The mean cadence in these studies was between 53 and 102 steps/min.
Step length. Nine studies analyzed step length in various subjects (poliomyelitis subjects, SCI patients, other pathol-ogies, and able bodied) while walking with a SCO. An increase in this parameter was reported in three stud-ies.2,3,12 However, three studies reported reduction in this parameter when using a SCO compared to a locked KAFO.16,17,20 One study reported similar results when ‘using a joint that can be switched between locked knee and stance control modes’ (mean: 0.6 m),8 but a second study demonstrated a reduction in step length compared to a locked KAFO.13 The mean of step length reported in these studies was between 50 and 70 cm. Two studies using a SCO in combination with an RGO by SCI patients dem-onstrated the mean of this parameter to be 0.46 and 0.36 m.10,18
Knee ROM. The knee joint needs 67° of flexion during swing phase in healthy subjects during normal walk-ing.16 Using a SCO reduces this mean to 40° in healthy subjects.16 The reported mean of this parameter was 62.9°,1 47°,24 50°, 61°,21 and 43°25 when SCOs are used compared to KAFO with drop locked knee joints (2°–5°). The mean knee joint ROM during swing phase was 50° when walking with a SCO associated with an RGO in SCI subjects compared to RGO with drop locked knee joints.10
Pelvic obliquity. Pelvic obliquity was analyzed in three stud-ies when SCO was compared to KAFO with drop locked knee joint in able-bodied, poliomyelitis, and various sub-jects.2,8,14 Irby et al.2 in gait evaluation of SCOs by 14 SCO users during a 6-month clinical field trial announced that all subjects had significantly lower pelvic obliquity, 2.8 mm (p = 0.04) compared to baseline. Zissimopoulos et al.8 studied the biomechanical and energetic effects of a SCO knee joint on the gait of nine non-disabled persons and reported significant differences between the locked mode and unlocked mode (p = 0.003) and auto mode and locked mode (p = 0.01). Yakimovich et al. evaluated the kinematics of a new SCKAFO on three male KAFO users with knee extensor weakness. The new SCKAFO improved
pelvic obliquity and provided a more natural gait for ortho-sis users compared to conventional KAFOs.14
Vertical and lateral displacement. Reduction in the mean of lateral displacement has been reported when using SCO compared to locked KAFO. Arazpour et al.,16 in using a SCO in healthy subjects, demonstrated the decreased rate of this parameter from 8.2 to 5.8 mm. In other study, Arazpour et al.17 in evaluation of powered SCO on one poliomyelitis subject reported a reduction in lateral dis-placement from 8.6 to 5.8 mm. Hwang et al.21 in an evalu-ation of electromechanical SCOs worn by four poliomyelitis subjects demonstrated a reduction in this parameter from 292.8 to 196.7 mm.
Similar to lateral displacement, reduction in vertical displacement has been demonstrated when walking with a SCO compared to a locked KAFO in poliomyelitis sub-jects. Both Arazpour et al.17 and Hwang et al.21 reported a reduction in this parameter from 64.7 to 54.2 and from 9.8 to 7.2 mm, respectively. This reduction, in another study by Arazpour et al.,16 was confirmed on healthy subjects when using a SCO compared to locked KAFO (from 9.8 to 7.1 mm). The optimal level of this parameter was reported as being 4.7° for lateral displacement and 5° for vertical displacement.16
Discussion
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SCO use on walking efficacy in users of this type of orthosis. Recommended indications are different for SCKAFOs compared to KAFOs. Subjects with lower limb weakness can use a KAFO with drop locked knee joints. Users who have sufficient hip strength can benefit from a SCKAFO, and the criterion for using a SCKAFO is the presence of hip strength of at least Grade 3. Impaired cognition, knee-flexion contracture >10°, moderate to severe spasticity of the hamstrings, lack of hip abductors in bilateral patients, uncorrectable genu varum/valgum >10°, lack of motiva-tion or inappropriate expectations, and body weight >300 lbs are all contraindications for using SCKAFOs.25
The provision of reduced energy consumption has been quoted as one of the main aims and reasons for subjects with lower limb weakness to walk with a SCO. Due to paralysis of the lower limb muscles, KAFO users are forced to walk with the knee in a locked position, hip hiking strat-egy, leg circumduction, or a vaulting gait.6,7 This can cause soft tissue injury, an increased effort to walk, and a high rate of energy consumption in KAFO users.3,8 Only three studies evaluated this parameter in poliomyelitis subjects when wearing SCO compared to a locked KAFO.8,12,13 Despite the advantages of walking with a SCO, this type of orthosis has not demonstrated a significant improvement by producing decreased energy consumption.8,13 It would be expected that based on the free swing in the knee joint
Rafiaei et al. 11
during swing phase made available by this device, the users effort would be decreased and therefore this would cause less energy consumption during ambulation. However, the number of participants was small, as few subjects partici-pated in these studies, so the results cannot be generalized for the larger population. More studies are therefore needed to further analyze this effect.
Increased knee joint flexion and extension during swing when walking with a SCO compared to a KAFO in sub-jects with lower limb paralysis is a positive function for such individuals. In using SCO, walking with the knee locked provides stance phase stability, but provides free flexion in swing phase during ambulation, and the devel-opment of the SCO was based on this concept. The knee joint must have approximately 70° of flexion available in normal walking, but SCOs have not demonstrated that they can provide this amount of flexion. Future designs of SCOs must consider this limitation by providing more knee joint flexion. In addition, stance phase flexion must be developed in new designs of SCO to provide flexion during loading response and late stance. This is because flexion of the knee joint in stance phase plays a shock-absorbing role and smoothes the COM trajectory during normal walking. SCOs therefore also need to provide a near-normal walking pattern for subjects with less lower limb muscle strength than healthy subjects. Using a pow-ered SCO may provide this, but the slow walking speed provided by these orthoses needs to be improved,16,17 and therefore, more research is needed in this field to provide more advanced powered SCO designs.
Using SCOs has been shown to provide improvement in frontal plane pelvic motions. Pelvic obliquity and verti-cal and lateral displacement have all improved with less abnormal gait deviations being noted (such as circumduc-tion, hip hiking, and vaulting gait) during walking, but the number of participants in these studies has been low. Improvements in hip and pelvic motions were small and did not occur consistently among all studies, making it dif-ficult to generalize this point of using SCOs compared to a locked KAFO. Future longitudinal studies involving more subjects and with longer training times with this type of orthosis may demonstrate whether the SCOs improve hip and pelvic kinematics.
The mean speed of walking when using SCOs has dem-onstrated lower walking speeds compared to a locked KAFO. Gait training with SCOs is also needed to produce a successful outcome in improving temporal spatial and kinematics during walking in KAFO users. Using a SCO needs a small knee extension moment to disengage knee joint locking in late stance. Experience of users during walking with the SCOs must be increased over time to pro-vide more ability in controlling the orthosis. The concen-tration required for SCKAFO control may be the cause of the shorter stride lengths demonstrated, associated with longer stride times, and therefore slower walking speeds
compared to walking with a locked KAFO. Another reason why SCO use does not improve walking speed is that stud-ies have compared experienced KAFOs users with sub-jects who only had a short time to acclimatize to walking with the SCOs. Consequently, gait training with SCOs should be performed for several days or weeks to become experienced in walking to increase ability and confidence of users to control the SCOs and improve gait function before being compared to other devices.
Production of SCKAFOs started in the early 1970s, and since then there have been continuous improvements and modifications in their design, including the use of hydrau-lic24 friction,26 elastic27 or impingement28,29 clutches,30,31 and brake mechanisms23 to provide the stance control con-cept. In commercially available SCKAFOs such as the E-Knee from Becker Orthopedics, the Horton stance con-trol knee joint, and the Sensor Walk from Otto Bock, weight-activated control is used. In the E-MAG Active from Otto Bock and SPL, the control of knee joint is posi-tion sensor activated. The Free Walk, UTX, and Full Stride/Safety Stride are ankle activated. According to cost, size, weight, or poor functionality, some of these designs have not led to clinical and commercial production, and develop-ment was based on mechanical and electromechanical mechanisms. New technologies can, however, be used to improve function of SCKAFOs; for instance, the use of actuators and sensors in lower limb orthoses have intro-duced new capabilities for adaptive control in SCOs.22,32,33
The selected studies are not analyzed according to the PEDro scale. This point was the main limitation of this study. The studies’ flaws included lack of randomization procedures, lack of control group, no masking of examin-ers and patients, and also there was lack of similarity among groups. These more recent studies have not sub-stantially improved the quality of the research. There is a continuing need for high-quality experimental studies in this area.
Future studies should therefore include the following:
•• A study includes meta-analyses to produce improved and more reliable conclusions according to speed, cadence, pelvic obliquity, and step length;
•• A comparison between the different types of SCKAFOs;
•• A comparison of SCOs and locked KAFOs in their effect on energy consumption and endurance of walking in KAFO users to add more clarification on the effect of this type of orthosis in the rehabilita-tion of walking;
•• The design and construction of more advanced SCOs to further improve structural characteristics of orthosis in KAFO users is recommended;
•• The design and construction of more advanced powered SCOs as future designs of orthosis for use in rehabilitation of walking in KAFO users;
12 Prosthetics and Orthotics International
•• An investigation into the effect of gait training with SCOs on walking parameters in future designs of studies;
•• An investigation into the effect of SCOs on COM displacement and stability in quiet standing;
•• Although cosmesis was not evaluated in using SCOs on KAFO users, consideration should be given to improve cosmesis of walking when KAFO users wear this type of orthoses;
•• The effect of SCOs on quality-of-life measures and social participation compared to KAFOs.
Conclusion
SCKAFOs have been shown to support the knee joint dur-ing stance phase and provide free knee movement during swing phase successfully in all the walking studies ana-lyzed.15 SCKAFO designs have provided improved gait kinematics for KAFO users. Using SCOs has been shown to provide improvement in pelvic obliquity and vertical and lateral displacement during walking. Despite the advantages of wearing a SCO, this type of orthosis has not demonstrated a significant improvement in producing decreased energy consumption.8,13 Lower walking speeds have been reported when using SCOs compared to a locked KAFO. Development of new design of SCO that provides more normal patterns of walking is required in this field. To improve walking, additional gait training and accommodation periods are needed before walking with SCOs by KAFO users.
Author contribution
All authors contributed equally in the preparation of this manuscript.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors did not have any conflicts of interest with regard to the study presented in this article.
Funding
We thank the Iran National Science Foundation for financial sup-port (grant number 92001422) for this research.
References
1. Bernhardt KA, Irby SE and Kaufman KR. Consumer opin-ions of a stance control knee orthosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30(3): 246–256.
2. Irby SE, Bernhardt KA and Kaufman KR. Gait changes over time in stance control orthosis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007; 31(4): 353–361.
3. McMillan AG, Kendrick K, Michael JW, et al. Preliminary evidence for effectiveness of a stance control orthosis. J Prosthet Orthot 2004; 16(1): 6–13.
4. Kepple TM, Siegel KL and Stanhope SJ. Relative contri-butions of the lower extremity joint moments to forward
progression and support during gait. Gait Posture 1997; 6(1): 1–8.
5. Peethambaran A. The relationship between performance, satisfaction, and well being for patients using anterior and posterior design knee-ankle-foot-orthosis. J Prosthet Orthot 2000; 12(1): 33–45.
6. Sulzer JS, Gordon KE, Dhaher YY, et al. Preswing knee flex-ion assistance is coupled with hip abduction in people with stiff-knee gait after stroke. Stroke 2010; 41(8): 1709–1714.
7. Lemaire ED, Goudreau L, Yakimovich T, et al. Angular-velocity control approach for stance-control orthoses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009; 17(5): 497–503.
8. Zissimopoulos A, Fatone S and Gard SA. Biomechanical and energetic effects of a stance-control orthotic knee joint. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44(4): 503–513.
9. Yakimovich T, Kofman J and Lemaire E (eds). Design, construction and evaluation of an electromechanical stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis. In: 2005 IEEE-EMBS 2005 27th annual international conference of the engineer-ing in medicine and biology society, Shanghai, China, 1–4 September 2005. New York: IEEE.
10. Rasmussen AA, Smith KM and Damiano DL. Biomechanical evaluation of the combination of bilateral stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthoses and a reciprocating gait orthosis in an adult with a spinal cord injury. J Prosthet Orthot 2007; 19(2): 42–47.
11. Irby SE, Bernhardt KA and Kaufman KR. Gait of stance control orthosis users: the dynamic knee brace system. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005; 29(3): 269–282.
12. Davis PC, Bach TM and Pereira DM. The effect of stance control orthoses on gait characteristics and energy expendi-ture in knee-ankle-foot orthosis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2010; 34(2): 206–215.
13. Hebert JS and Liggins AB. Gait evaluation of an automatic stance-control knee orthosis in a patient with postpoliomy-elitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(8): 1676–1680.
14. Yakimovich T, Lemaire ED and Kofman J (eds). Gait evalu-ation of a new electromechanical stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis. In: 2006 EMBS’06 28th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biol-ogy society, New York, 30 August–3 September 2006. New York: IEEE.
15. Yakimovich T, Lemaire ED and Kofman J. Engineering design review of stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthoses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009; 46(2): 257–267.
16. Arazpour M, Ahmadi F, Bani MA, et al. Gait evaluation of new powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis in able-bodied per-sons: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. Epub ahead of print 9 May 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0309364613486917.
17. Arazpour M, Chitsazan A, Bani MA, et al. The effect of a knee ankle foot orthosis incorporating an active knee mechanism on gait of a person with poliomyelitis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013; 37: 411–414.
18. To CS, Kobetic R, Bulea TC, et al. Sensor-based stance con-trol with orthosis and functional neuromuscular stimulation for walking after spinal cord injury. J Prosthet Orthot 2012; 24(3): 124–132.
19. Bernhardt K, Oh T and Kaufman K. Stance control ortho-sis trial in patients with inclusion body myositis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35(1): 39–44.
Rafiaei et al. 13
20. Yakimovich T, Lemaire ED and Kofman J. Preliminary kin-ematic evaluation of a new stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis. Clin Biomech 2006; 21(10): 1081–1089.
21. Hwang S, Kang S, Cho K, et al. Biomechanical effect of electromechanical knee-ankle-foot-orthosis on knee joint control in patients with poliomyelitis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008; 46(6): 541–549.
22. Ferris DP, Gordon KE, Sawicki GS, et al. An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control. Gait Posture 2006; 23(4): 425–428.
23. Tokuhara Y, Kameyama O, Kubota T, et al. Biomechanical study of gait using an intelligent brace. J Orthop Sci 2000; 5(4): 342–348.
24. Raftopoulos DD, Armstrong CW, Poulos L, et al. A novel design of a knee-ankle-foot orthosis and its evaluation. In: ASME Advances in Bioengineering Conference, Anaheim, CA, 1986, pp.128–129.
25. Otto Bock. E-MAG active coding justification. Available at: www.ottobock.com
26. Weddendorf BC. Automatic locking orthotic knee device. Patent US 5267950 A, 1993.
27. Kofman J, Allard P, Duhaime M, et al. A functional knee-ankle orthosis for Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients using a spring-loaded knee joint mechanism. Orthop Tech 1985; 6(85): 403–407.
28. Harris AI. Automatically releasing knee brace. Patent US 4632096 A, 1986.
29. Goudsmit JA and Nijenbanning G. Gravity operated lock-ing hinge. Patent US 6979304 B2, 2005.
30. Harrison R, Lemaire E, Jeffreys Y, et al. Design and pilot testing of an orthotic stance-phase control knee joint. Orthop Tech 2001; 111: 2–4.
31. Myers N. Releasable conical roller-clutch for knee brace. New York: NASA Tech Briefs, 2002, p. 56.
32. Moreno JC, Brunetti F, Rocon E, et al. Immediate effects of a controllable knee ankle foot orthosis for functional compensation of gait in patients with proxi-mal leg weakness. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008; 46(1): 43–53.
33. Blaya JA and Herr H. Adaptive control of a variable-imped-ance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004; 12(1): 24–31.