19
Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Dr. Scott Parke, Vice Chancellor for Research, Florida College System (FCS) Ms. Julie Alexander, Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs, FCS Dr. Kathyrine Scheuch, Research Analyst, FCS Ms. Carrie Henderson, Coordinator of Student Success, FCS The Florida College System Strategic Plan Webinar 2: Performance Metrics and Target Setting 1

The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Thursday, August 16, 2012

9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.

Dr. Scott Parke, Vice Chancellor for Research, Florida College System (FCS)

Ms. Julie Alexander, Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs, FCS

Dr. Kathyrine Scheuch, Research Analyst, FCS

Ms. Carrie Henderson, Coordinator of Student Success, FCS

The Florida College System Strategic Plan Webinar 2: Performance Metrics and Target Setting

1

Page 2: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Context: Statutory requirements 1001.02 (3)(a) SBOE shall adopt a strategic plan

SBOE should specify goals and objectives for the state’s public schools and FCS institutions

The strategic plan shall Be formulated in conjunction with plans of Board of Governors in order to:

Be coordinated to best meet state needs

Reflect cost-effective use of state resources

The strategic plan must clarify The mission statements of each FCS institution and the system as a whole Identify degree programs (including baccalaureate) offered

The strategic plan must Cover a period of 5 years Be modified after 2 years Be coordinated with the master plan

The strategic plans must Specifically include programs and procedures for responding to educational needs of

teachers and students Consider reports and recommendations of the Higher Education Coordinating Council

and Articulation Coordinating Committee

The SBOE shall submit a report to the President and Speaker upon modification of the plan and as part of its Legislative Budget Request

2

Page 3: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Context: Statutory requirements 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and

objectives that identifies performance metrics for the Florida College System and specifies goals and objectives for each Florida College System institution

(a) Examples of metrics: remediation success, retention, graduation, employment, transfer rates, licensure passage, excess hours, student loan burden and default rates, job placement

3

Page 4: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Context: Where we were

State Board of Education

Florida’s Next Generation PreK-

20 Education Strategic Plan

Last update: March 2010

The Florida College System

Stepping Up: A Strategic Plan for

The Florida College System

Council of Presidents

approved: 2010

Board of Governors

Strategic Plan 2012-2025

Board approval: 2011

4

Page 5: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Context: Where we are

SBOE Plan

One plan to cover

Florida’s educational

delivery systems

System Plan

One plan with one

mission for the System

College Plans

28 plans specific to local service areas

5

Page 6: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Four Core Goals of FCS Strategic Plan

6

Page 7: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Performance Target Setting

Continuity – Florida State Board of Education-wide aligned approach.

Numeric goals sought.

Tied to a review of trend data.

Incorporate expedited expert review and validation.

Emphasis on Florida College System-wide 2017 goal for each metric.

Focus – Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) identify priorities.

7

Page 8: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

8

Page 9: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 1: Expand and Maintain Access

Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

1.1 Number of high school students participating

in dual enrollment

46,083

• Descriptor: Unduplicated headcount by course

enrollment (total dual enrolled), 2010-11

• Source: CCTCMIS

Calculation:

=Sum of students in 28 colleges

http://www.fldoe.org/cc/OSAS/Evaluatio

ns/pdf/FYI2011-09DualEnrollment.pdf

(page 2)

1.2 Number of students enrolled in college credit

courses in the FCS disaggregated by age

range

478,130 total

Under 18-21:

225,951

22-29: 135,187

30-39: 64,014

40-64: 51,777

Other: 1,201

• Descriptor: Fall headcount enrollment for full-

time and part-time students

enrolled for credit by age ranges, 2011-12

• Source: CCTCMIS, 2012 Fact Book

Calculation:

=Sum of students in 28 colleges

http://www.fldoehub.org/CCTCMIS/c/Do

cuments/Fact%20Books/fb2012.pdf

(table 1.7T)

1.3.1 Percentage of students who enroll in the

year following high school graduation

36.0% (58,629) • Descriptor: 2009-10 High School diploma

recipients who enroll in FCS, 2010-11

• Source: Education Data Warehouse, Florida

Department of Education

Calculation:

= Total 2010 K-12 grads enrolled in FCS

in 2010-11 / 2010 K-12 grads

=58,629/165,033

=36%

1.3.2 Of students who enroll in the year following

high school graduation, percentage of

minority students

59.0% (34,432) • Descriptor: 2010-11

• Source: CCTCMIS

Calculation:

=Minority 2010 K-12 grads enrolled in

FCS in 2010-11 / Total 2010 K-12 grads

enrolled in FCS in 2010-11

=34,432/58,629

=59%

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

9

Page 10: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 1: Expand and Maintain Access (cont’d)

Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

1.3.3 Of students who enroll in the year following

high school graduation, percentage of low

income students

60.0% (34,918) • Descriptor: 2010-11

• Source: CCTCMIS

Calculation:

=Low-income 2010 K-12 grads enrolled

in FCS in 2010-11 / Total 2010 K-12

grads enrolled in FCS in 2010-11

=34,918/58,629

=60%

1.4 Percentage of degree-seeking students

classified as non-Florida residents for tuition

purposes

3.7% (24,305) • Descriptor: Dual enrolled, adult general

education and continuing workforce

education students excluded, 2010–11

• Source: CCTCMIS, College Student Data Base

Calculation:

= Non-Florida Residents/Unduplicated

total

=24,305/658,117

=3.7%

1.5 Average net price $6,511 • Descriptor: 2009-10

• Source: USDOE, College Affordability and

Transparency Center

Calculation:

= Sum of net prices/28 colleges

=$182,604/28

=$6,511

http://collegecost.ed.gov/catc/

1.6 Number of students completing an adult

education level

52,192 • Descriptor: 2010–11

• Source: CCTCMIS, 2012 Fact Book

Calculation:

=Sum of students in 28 colleges

http://www.fldoehub.org/cctcmis/docume

nts/nrs/1011nrs/colleges.pdf (table 4,

column D)

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

10

Page 11: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 1: Expand and Maintain Access (cont’d)

Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

1.7 Number of students enrolled in

community education programs

Continuing Workforce

Education

151,948

Recreation and Leisure

57,761

• Descriptor: 2010–11

• Source: CCTCMIS, 2012 Fact Book

Calculation:

=Sum of students in 28 colleges

http://www.fldoehub.org/CCTCMIS/c/Doc

uments/Fact%20Books/fb2012.pdf

(Points of Interest Table)

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

11

Page 12: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 2: Optimize Use of Learning Technologies

Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

2.1 Percentage of students enrolled in an

online/distance learning course*

33.0% (268,374) • Descriptor: Of the students enrolled in a course,

unduplicated headcount of students in distance

learning courses, 2010-11

• Source: CCTCMIS, Personnel Data Bases

Calculation:

=Number of unduplicated students

enrolling in distance learning courses/

Number of unduplicated students

enrolling in A&P, PSV, PSAV, CWE or

Apprentice courses

=268,374/809,189

=33%

2.2 Percentage of students earning a

grade “C” or better in traditional

campus-based, online/distance

learning, or hybrid courses*

Traditional

75.9% (878,847)

Distance Learning

69.9% (126,325)

Hybrid

76.3% (38,752)

• Descriptor: Course grades by course type, Fall

2009

• Source: CCTCMIS, Personnel Data Bases

Calculation:

= Students who earn “C” or

better/students enrolled in course

Traditional

= 878,847/1,157,654

=75.9%

Distance Learning

=126,325/180,754

=69.9%

Hybrid

=38,752/50,820

=76.3%

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

12

Page 13: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 3: Increase College Readiness and Success

Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

3.1 Percentage of Developmental

Education completers who go on to

complete a college level course in

the same subject within two

academic years of entry*

Mathematics

31.8% (2,765)

English

63.7% (3,974)

Mathematics & English

23.7% (2,031)

• Descriptor: Total first time entry students, Fall

2007.

• Source: CCTCMIS, Complete College America

submission

Calculation:

= Students completed gatekeeper

courses/students who completed

remedial courses in same subject(s)

Mathematics

=2,765/8,698

=31.7%

English

=3,974/6,235

=63.7%

Mathematics & English

=2,031/8,579

=23.7%

3.2 Number of institutional and program

rankings*

Institutional

rankings: 128

Program rankings: 56

• Descriptor: 28 colleges reporting rankings, 2011-

12

• Source: Colleges self-reported

Calculation:

=Sum of rankings reported by 28

colleges

3.3 Number of faculty receiving awards* 743 • Descriptor: 28 colleges reporting rankings, 2011-

12

• Source: Colleges self-reported

Calculation:

=Sum of rankings reported by 28

colleges

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

13

Page 14: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 3: Increase College Readiness and Success Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

3.4 Percentage of students receiving

federal, state, local, institutional, or

other sources of grant aid

51.0% (227,977) • Descriptor: Of the number of undergraduate

students in the financial aid cohort

(449,411), 51% of them received grant aid in 2009-

10

• Source: IPEDS

Calculation:

= Number of undergraduate students

receiving federal state local institutional

or other sources of grant aid / Total

number of undergraduates in financial aid

cohort

=227,977/449,411

=51%

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/

3.5 Percentage of students receiving

Federal student loans and average

amount of Federal student loan aid

received by undergraduate student*

Students Receiving

Loans

17.0% (79,250)

Average Amount of Loan

Received

$4,525

• Descriptor: Of the number of undergraduate

students in the financial aid cohort (449,411), 17%

of them received federal loans in 2009-10. The

average student

loan received was $4,525 in 2009-10, which does

not automatically translate to loan debt (this is a

proxy to loan burden)

• Source: IPEDS

Calculation:

Students Receiving Loans

= Number of undergraduate students

receiving federal student loans / Total

number of undergraduates in financial aid

cohort

=79,250/449,411

=17%

Average Amount of Loan Received

=Sum of Average amount of Federal

student loan aid received by

undergraduate students/27 colleges*

=$122,171/27

=4,525

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/

*NFCC does not offer student loans

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

14

Page 15: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 3: Increase College Readiness and Success Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

3.6 Cohort default rate for FCS* 12.9% • Descriptor: Official Two-Year Default Rate, 2009

• Source: USDOE, Default Prevention and

Management

Calculation:

=Number of Borrowers in Default/

Number of Borrowers in Repay

=4,232/32,746

=12.9%

http://www2.ed.gov/offices/OSFAP/defaul

tmanagement/cdr.html

3.7 Retention rates* AA Retention

Rate: 66.7%

AAS/AS Retention

Rate: 58.4%

• Descriptor: Retention rate = (Number of students

who have graduated + number of students who are

enrolled and in good academic standing + number

of students who are enrolled and who are not in

good academic standing) divided by the number of

students in the cohort pool, 2011.

• Source: CCTCMIS

Calculation:

Number of students who have graduated

+ number of students who are enrolled

and in good academic standing + number

of students who are enrolled and who are

not in good academic standing / by the

number of students in the cohort pool

http://www.fldoe.org/cc/OSAS/Evaluation

s/pdf/fyi1201LDAccountability.pdf

(exhibits 2 and 6)

3.8 Number of degrees and certificates

awarded*

93,285 • Descriptor: 2010-11

• Source: CCTCMIS, 2012 Fact Book

Calculation:

=Sum of degrees and certificates

awarded by 28 colleges

http://www.fldoehub.org/CCTCMIS/c/Doc

uments/Fact%20Books/fb2012.pdf

(Points of Interest table)

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

15

Page 16: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 3: Increase College Readiness and Success Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

3.9 Graduation rate for first-time in college

students (150% time)*

35.0% of Cohort

Graduate in 150% time

• Descriptor: Represents full-time, first-time, degree

or certificate undergraduates, 2007 cohort

• Source: Southern Regional Education Board

(SREB) State Data Exchange 2010-11 Indicators

Report, January 2012

“Student First-Year Persistence Rate and

Progression Rate, by State, Type, and

Institution” (Table 34)

http://www.sreb.org/page/1126/srebstate

_data_exchange.html

3.10 Average time and credit to associate

degree*

Time to Degree

Accelerated students: 2.8

years

Non-Accelerated

Students: 4.5 years

Credit to Degree

Accelerated students: 73

credits

Non-Accelerated

Students: 78 credits

• Time to degree

• Descriptor: Accelerated students have earned

college credit through

acceleration mechanisms, such as dual enrollment.

SREB average years to degree at college awarding

associates degrees, 2009-10

• Source: SREB State Data Exchange, Table 63,

January 2012

• Credit to degree

• Descriptor: Accelerated students have earned

college credit through

acceleration mechanisms, such as dual enrollment.

Average credits attempted at college awarding

associates degrees, 2009-10

• Source: SREB State Data Exchange, Table 75,

January 2012

“Time to Degree and Credits Attempted

to Degree, by State, Type, and

Institution” (Table 51)

http://www.sreb.org/page/1126/srebstate

_data_exchange.html

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

16

Page 17: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 3: Increase College Readiness and Success Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

3.11 Transfer rates of associate degree

graduates who transfer within two

years to the upper division at a

Florida College System institution or

state university*

Transfers enrolled in

SUS

51.0% (26,250)

Transfers in FCS upper

division

7.0% (3,909)

• Descriptor: 2008-09 degree completers that were

found enrolled in the 2008-09, 2009-10, & 2010-11

in upper division of FCS and SUS

• Source: CCTCMIS

Calculation:

=Associate transfers enrolled in upper

division/Associate (AA, AS, AAS)

completers

SUS

=26,250/51,744

=51%

FCS Upper Division

=3,909/51,744

=7%

3.12 Percentage of students taking and

passing licensure exams in nursing*

NCLEX-RN (Registered

Nurse)

89.7% (4,214)

NCLEX-PN (Practical

Nurse)

88.6% (569)

• Descriptor: Percentage of test takers who pass

the exam, 2011

• Source: Florida Department of Health, Division of

Medical Quality Assurance

Calculation:

= Students who passed exam / Students

who took exam

NCLEX-RN (Registered Nurse)

=4,214/4,699

=89.7%

NCLEX-PN (Practical Nurse)

=569/642

=88.6%

http://www.doh.state.fl.us/mqa/nursing/nu

r_edu_info.html

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

17

Page 18: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Goal 4: Prepare for Careers Performance Indicator Baseline Notes Calculation

4.1. Percentage of graduates found

employed in the state of Florida within

one year of completion disaggregated

by certificate/degree type

Career

Certificate: 75.0%

College Credit

Certificate: 69.0%

AAS: 69.0%

AS: 78.0%

AA: 61.0%

Bachelors: 72.0%

• Descriptor: 2009-10 Completers, Fall 2010

Findings

• Source: FETPIP Annual Outcomes Report

Calculation:

=Number found employed/total

individuals

http://www.fldoe.org/fetpip/pdf/0910pdf/p

ubs0910text.pdf

4.2. Average wages of graduates, found

employed in the state of Florida within

one year of completion disaggregated

by certificate/degree type

Career

Certificate: $37,984

College Credit

Certificate: $37,184

AAS: $41,732

AS: $46,604

AA: $31,948

Bachelors: $48,936

• Descriptor: Average Full-Time, Full-Quarter

earnings, 2009-10 Completers, Fall 2010 Findings.

Many AA students go on to continue their

education, which

could contribute to the lower salary compared to

other graduates

• Source: FETPIP Annual Outcomes Report

Calculation:

=Initial quarterly earnings x 4 =

annualized earnings

http://www.fldoe.org/fetpip/pdf/0910pdf/p

ubs0910text.pdf

Bold indicators are part of the “Key Performance Indicator” Dashboard *Performance indicator identified in s. 1001.03, F.S.

18

Page 19: The Florida College System Strategic Planfscj.s3.amazonaws.com/22452/webinar2.pdf · 1001.03(16) SBOE shall adopt a plan specifying goals and objectives that identifies performance

Next Steps & Questions?

19