THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SURREYTHE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SURREY Y Municipal Hall 14245 - 56th Avenue Surrey, B.C. Monday, December 14, 1981 Time: 7:lO p.m. Minutes

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SURREY

Y

Municipal H a l l 14245 - 56th Avenue Surrey, B.C. Monday, December 14, 1981 Time: 7:lO p.m.

Minutes of a Regular Council meeting he ld i n t h e Council Chamber on Monday, December 14, 1981 at 7:lO p.m.

A l l t h e members of Council were p resen t , except f o r Alderman Jacobs and Alderman Campbell. Alderman Watkins en tered the meeting as i n d i c a t e i n t h e minutes.

Also p resen t were t h e Municipal Manager, t he Ass i s t an t t o t h e Manager, t h e Manager of Adminis t ra t ive Services - Planning, and t h e Municipal Clerk.

bm A. ADOPTION OF MINUTES:

1. It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e minutes of t h e Inaugural Council

meeting of December 7 , 1981, be adopted. RES.NO.1-287 Carr ied

2. It was Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Fomich That t h e minutes of t h e Regular Council

Meeting of December 9 , 1981, be adopted. RES .NO. 1-288 Carr ied

3. It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e minutes of t h e

Council-in-Conmittee meeting of November 30, 1981, be received. RES.NO.1-289 Carr ied

The Municipal Clerk ind ica t ed t h a t t h e recommendation contained i n t h e s e minutes w a s adopted at t h e Regular Council Meeting he ld on November 30th, 1981.

B. DELEGATIONS :

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

M r . Berry of 5775 - 136th S t r e e t , Surrey, B.C. was t o have been d present regard ing Appl ica t ion 5681-261. This a p p l i c a t i o n f o r rezoning w a s defea ted by Council on November 16, 1981.

The Mayor ind ica t ed t h a t M r . Berry had cance l led h i s de lega t ion .

M r . F. Jeanson of 7780 - 152nd S t r e e t , w a s p resent regarding t h e T r i p l e C Ranch proposal , d ra inage problems on 152nd S t r e e t , and br idge e ros ion on t h e ranch property.

M r . Jeanson ind ica t ed t h a t t h e dra inage problems on t h e proper ty at 7780 - 152nd S t r e e t and on t h e gol f course on t h e w e s t s i d e of 152nd S t r e e t had been increased because of t h e road cons t ruc t ion on 152nd S t r e e t . M r . Jeanson s t a t e d t h a t t h e new c u l v e r t cons t ruc ted on 152nd S t r e e t south of t h e Bear Creek Bridge does not func t ion proper ly and as a r e s u l t water from t h i s c u l v e r t i s backing up and f lood ing t h e gol f course property.

Mr. Jeanson ind ica t ed t h a t t h e e ros ion problem on t h e Ranch proper ty s t a r t e d i n 1979 and t o t h i s d a t e , he has l o s t approximately 16 f e e t of proper ty because of erosion. M r . Jeanson noted t h a t access t o h i s proper ty has been l i m i t e d , because h i s own personal br idge i s i n danger of washing o u t , due t o t h e increased water f low i n Bear Creek.

Alderman Watkins en tered t h e meeting.

M r . Jeanson w a s reques t ing t h a t t h i s matter be inves t iga t ed .

M r . T. Willman of 35F Leeder S t r e e t , Coquitlam, w a s t o have been present regard ing t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n of a s i g n a t t h e southwest corner of 138A S t r e e t and 72nd Avenue.

M r . Willman w a s no t present a t t h i s meeting.

M r . Kitchen w a s t o have been present on behalf of t h e Mug and Musket Restaurant concerning t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n of a s i g n a t 152nd S t r e e t and 96th Avenue.

The Mayor ind ica t ed t h a t M r . Kitchen had resolved t h e s i t u a t i o n and would not be appearing as a de lega t ion .

Representa t ives of Ladue Investments Ltd., 7180 Kingsway, Burnaby and t h e Royal Bank of Canada, 613 Columbia S t r e e t , New Westminster, were t o have been present regard ing a Sec t ion 936 Order on a d i l a p i d a t e d dwell ing a t 15040 - 100th Avenue.

Representa t ives were not p re sen t a t t h i s meeting.

2.

mm

cr

It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Bose That t h e Council of t h e Corporation of

t h e Dis t r ic t of Surrey hereby dec la re s t h a t t he dwell ing loca ted on Lot Nine (9) of Sec t ion Thirty-Two (32) , Block Five (5) North, Range One ( 1 ) West, Plan One Thousand One Hundred Forty-Two (1142), NWD, being 15040 - 100th Avenue, Surrey, B.C., i s i n s o d i l ap ida ted and uncleanly a condi t ion as t o be o f f ens ive t o the community. It is hereby ordered t h a t t h e s a i d d i l a p i d a t e d dwell ing be demolished, foundat ion removed o r f i l l e d i n wi th c l ean granular material, if necessary, and a l l d e b r i s removed from t h e s i t e by t h e owners o r agent of t h e owners wi th in t h i r t y (30) days of s e r v i c e of t h i s o rde r upon them. It i s f u r t h e r ordered t h a t , should t h e owners o r agent of t h e owners f a i l t o comply wi th t h e a fo resa id o rde r w i th in t h e s a i d per iod of t h i r t y (30) days, t h e Permits and Licenses Department, by our own workmen o r con t r ac to r s , may be i n s t r u c t e d t o e n t e r on t h e land and demolish t h e d i l ap ida ted dwell ing and remove t h e d e b r i s from t h e s i t e a t t h e expense of t h e owner and t h e charges f o r so doing, i f unpaid by t h e owner on t h e 31st day of December of any yea r , s h a l l be added t o and form p a r t of t h e taxes payable i n respec t of t h a t land as t axes i n arrears.

RES.NO.1-290 Carr ied

6. Representa t ives of Kartar Family Developments Ltd., 1305 - 186 V i c t o r i a S t r e e t , Kamloops and Kamland Holding & Finance Limited, Jasmine En te rp r i se s Ltd., J. & T. Lumber Limited, and Ghag Investments Ltd., were t o be present regard ing a Sect ion 936 Order on a d i l a p i d a t e d dwell ing and 3 sheds a t 13386 - 80th Avenue.

The Municipal Clerk i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e r e s o l u t i o n under Sec t ion 936 w a s not necessary, as t h e bu i ld ing and 3 sheds have been demolished t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n of t h e Permits and Licenses Department.

7. Representat ives of Cal-Van Accessories Ltd., 500 Kingsway, Vancouver and M r . G. F r i s e n , 500 Kingsway, Vancouver, were t o be present regard ing a Sect ion 936 Order on a vandal ized dwell ing a t 10366 - 136A S t r e e t .

Representat ives were not present a t t h i s meeting.

It was Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Easton That t h e Council of t h e Corporation of

t h e Distr ic t of Surrey hereby dec la re s t h a t t h e vacant and vandal ized dwell ing loca ted on Lot Eight ( 8 ) , of Block S ix ( 6 ) and Block Seven (7), of Sect ion Twenty-Six (26) , Block Five (5) North, Range Two (2) West, Plan Nine Thousand S i x Hundred Thirty-Eight (9638), NWD, being 10366 - 136A S t r e e t , Surrey, B.C., is i n so d i l a p i d a t e d and uncleanly a cond i t ion as t o be o f f ens ive t o the community. It i s hereby ordered t h a t t h e s a i d vacant and vandal ized dwell ing be demolished, foundat ion removed o r f i l l e d i n wi th c l ean g ranu la r material, i f necessary, and a l l d e b r i s removed

3.

from t h e s i t e by t h e owners o r agent of t h e owners wi th in t h i r t y (30) days of s e r v i c e of t h i s o rde r upon them. ordered t h a t , should t h e owners o r agent of t h e owners f a i l t o comply wi th t h e a fo resa id o rde r w i th in t h e s a i d per iod of t h i r t y (30) days, t h e Permits and Licenses Department, by our own workmen o r con t r ac to r s , may be i n s t r u c t e d t o e n t e r on t h e land and demolish t h e vacant and vandal ized dwell ing, and remove t h e d e b r i s from t h e s i te a t t h e expense of t h e owner and t h e charges f o r s o doing, i f unpaid by t h e owner on t h e 31st day of December of any y e a r , s h a l l be added t o and form p a r t of t h e t axes payable i n respec t of t h a t land as t axes i n arrears.

It i s f u r t h e r


C. REPORTS OF VARIOUS COMMITTEES:

1. ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL

( a ) It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Bose That t h e minutes of t h e meeting of

December 9, 1981, be received. RES.NO. 1-292 Carr ied

(b) It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e recommendations of these minutes

Carr ied wi th Aldermen Bose and Fomich a g a i n s t .

be adopted. RES.NO. 1-293

2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Easton That t h e minutes of t h e meeting of

November 26, 1981, be received. RES.NO. 1-294 Carr ied

Alderman Whittaker i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e Economic Development Committee had requested Counci l ' s approval t o spend $6,500.00 on a Hotel/Motel Study.

The Manager then ind ica t ed t h a t he would review t h e s t a t u s of t h i s reques t f o r t h e $6,500.00 funding.

D. REPORTS OF VARIOUS BOARDS:

1. FRASER VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY BOARD

II

A n o t i c e had been received adv i s ing t h a t t h e next meeting of t h e Board of Management would be he ld on Wednesday, December 16, 1981.

4 .

It was

rr RES.NO.1-295

Moved by Alderman Pomich Seconded by Alderman Easton That this notice be received. Carried

2. Alderman Fomich indicated that he had been asked to sit on the Resolutions Committee of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. be dealing with outstanding resolutions that would have to be presented to the Federal Cabinet. he had accepted this appointment to the Resolutions Committee.

Alderman Fomich stated that this Committee would

Alderman Fomich indicated that

It was Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Fomich That the Municipal Clerk draft a

resolution for submission to the F.C.M. requesting that the original wording for "0' Canada" be retained.

RES.NO.1-296 Carried

3. Alderman Watkins indicated that the Boundary Health Board was still trying to meet with the Minister of Health regarding the status of mental health matters within the Municipality. Alderman Watkins suggested that the Municipality could possibly invite the Minister to a meeting at which the Boundary Health unit members cou Id attend.

E. MAYOR'S REPORT: Y

1. The Mayor indicated that he was bringing back for reconsideration, under Section 240 of the "Municipal Act", resolutions in connection with Application 5681-491 for rezoning from R-F to RM-4 property, located at 10309, 10321 & 10337 - 144th Street to permit a 242 unit apartment project to proceed.

Alderman Fomich indicated that it was not appropriate for the Mayor to bring back the resolutions, as he was not present at the Regular Council meeting when they were dealt with.

Alderman Fomich then challenged the Chair.

The Mayor then indicated "Shall the Chair be sustained?"

The Chair was sustained with Alderman Fomich against. RES.NO.1-297 Carried

The following motion was then before Council:-

It was Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Whalley Official Community Plan

By-law, 1969, No. 3059, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6967" be filed.

5.

RES.NO.1-298 This motion w a s Defeated

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Whalley O f f i c i a l Community Plan

By-law, 1969, No. 3059, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6967" pass i t s t h i r d reading.

RES.NO.1-299 Carr ied w i t h Alderman Whittaker, Easton and Fomich aga ins t .

RES.NO.1-300

The fol lowing motion w a s then before Council:-

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6966" pass i t s t h i r d reading.

Car r ied wi th Aldermen Whittaker, Easton, and Fomich aga ins t .

It w a s then Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That t h e Municipal Clerk advise t h e

ad jacent r e s i d e n t s t h a t t h e By-laws 6967 and 6966 have now received t h i r d reading.

RES.NO. 1-301 Carr ied

2. The Mayor ind ica t ed t h a t he had gone wi th t h e Municipal Manager and t h e Municipal Engineer t o m e e t wi th t h e Minister of Highways i n Vic to r i a regarding s e v e r a l concerns wi th in t h e Municipal i ty . The Mayor s t a t e d t h a t t h e fo l lowing matters w e r e discussed wi th t h e Minis te r :

II

( a ) The r e l o c a t i o n of t h e rai lway l i n e s i n t h e Cloverdale area.

(b) The es tab l i shment of a park-and-ride f a c i l i t y , ad jacent t o t h e No. 1 Freeway.

(c) 176th S t r e e t

( d ) Limited access from 196th S t r e e t onto t h e No. 1 Freeway.

( e ) The alignment and i n t e r s e c t i o n of 192nd S t r e e t , 64th Avenue, and t h e F rase r Highway.

( f ) The establ ishment of a motor v e h i c l e t e s t i n g s t a t i o n .

In connection wi th t h e motor v e h i c l e t e s t i n g s t a t i o n , t h e Mayor ind ica t ed t h a t t h e Min i s t e r is cons ider ing t h e use of l i censed mechanics t o undertake t h e t e s t i n g .

Alderman Schrenk then quest ioned whether o r no t t h e Minis te r considered t h e matter of t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n of 176th S t r e e t and 8 th Avenue. The Mayor ind ica t ed t h a t t h e material on t h i s matter had

U

6.

been submitted t o t h e Minis ter .

Lw Alderman Bose suggested t h a t copies of t h e minutes of t h i s meeting be d i s t r i b u t e d t o t h e Cloverdale Local Board of Trade and t h e Cloverdale Local Area Planning Committee.

Alderman Schrenk ind ica t ed t h a t t h e matter of t h e alignment of 192nd S t r e e t , 64th Avenue, and t h e F rase r Highway should be forwarded t o t h e Clayton Community Assoc ia t ion for t h e i r information.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e Regular Council meeting do now

adjourn t o a Publ ic Hearing on s e v e r a l by-laws. RES.NO.1-302 Carr ied

The Regular Council meeting adjourned a t 7:40 p.m. and re-convened at 9:05 p.m.

Due t o t h e l eng th of t h e Publ ic Hearing, t h e Mayor ind ica t ed t h a t a coffee-break would be held.

The Regular Council Meeting re-convened a t 9 : 2 5 p.m.

F.

M

BY-LAWS :

Alderman Schrenk ind ica t ed t h a t she had read t h e minutes of t h e Publ ic Hearing meeting he ld on December 9 , 1981.

1. "Part I of Surrey Zoning Bylaw, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6665" w a s considered.

It was Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That Appl ica t ion 5681-114 be considered

as a new p r o j e c t , i n l i g h t of t h e changes made.

RES.NO.1-303 This motion w a s Defeated wi th Alderman Whit taker , Alderman Easton, Alderman Fomich, and t h e Mayor a g a i n s t .

2. "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6934" had been t o Pub l i c Hearing earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read for t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Bose That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,


7.


3. "Pa r t 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6936" had been t o Publ ic Hearing earlier t h i s evening J

and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Easton That " P a r t 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law,


RES.NO.1-305 Carried wi th Alderman Bose aga ins t .

4. "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6939" had been t o Publ ic Hearing earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

I t w a s Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Easton That " P a r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



5. "Par t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6941" had been to Publ ic Hearing earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Bose That "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



6. "Pa r t 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6942" had been t o Publ ic Hearing earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That " P a r t 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



7. "Pa r t I of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6944" had been t o Publ ic Hearing earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

8.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

k 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6944" r ece ive t h i r d reading.

RES.NO.1-309 Carried wi th Alderman Fomich aga ins t .

A motion by Alderman Fomich t o amend t h e zoning under Applicat ion 5681-487 t o RT-1 received no Seconder.

Alderman Bose ind ica t ed t h a t t h e Adminis t ra t ion should i n v e s t i g a t e t h e use of a l t e r n a t e accesses t o t h e s i t e and t h a t a r epor t on t h e f e a s i b i l i t y of us ing 96th Avenue and 120th S t r e e t be provided t o Council.

8. "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6949" had been t o Publ ic Hearing earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That " P a r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



U 9. "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law,

1981, No. 6950" had been t o Pub l i c Hearing earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Easton That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



10. "Whalley O f f i c i a l Community Plan By-law, 1969, No. 3059, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6951" had been to Publ ic earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Whalley O f f i c i a l Community Plan

By-law, 1969, No. 3059, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6951" pass i t s t h i r d reading.



9.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Fomich That "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6952" pass i t s t h i r d reading. rJ

RES. NO. 1-3 13 Carried

12. It w a s Moved by Alderman Whit t aker Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6958" r ece ive t h i r d reading .

RES.NO.1-314 This motion w a s Defeated wi th Aldermen Ezston, Watkins, Bose, and Fomich aga ins t .

RES. NO. 1-315

It w a s then Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Fomich That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

Carr ied wi th Aldermen Schrenk and Whittaker aga ins t .

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6958" be f i l e d .


It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Fomich That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



14. "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6980" had been t o Pub l i c Hearing earlier t h i s evening and w a s now read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,


RES.NO.1-317 Carr ied w i t h Alderman Bose aga ins t .

15. "Surrey O f f i c i a l Community Plan By-law, 1966, No. 2465, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6826" w a s read and reconsidered.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey O f f i c i a l Community Plan

By-law, 1966, No. 2465, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6826" be f i n a l l y adopted, signed by t h e Mayor and Clerk and s e a l e d wi th t h e Corporate Seal .

10.


16. "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment And Mandatory Development P e r m i t Areas Designat ion By-law, 1980, No. 6178, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6824" w a s read and reconsidered.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment And Mandatory Development Permit Areas Designation By-law, 1980, No. 6178, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6824" be f i n a l l y adopted, signed by t h e Mayor and Clerk, and sea led wi th t h e Corporate Seal .


17. "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6823" w a s read and reconsidered.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That " P a r t 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6823" be f i n a l l y adopted, signed by t h e Mayor and Clerk, and sea l ed wi th t h e Corporate Seal .

RE3.NO.I-320 Carr ied

18. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6825" w a s read and reconsidered.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No.

2265, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6825" be f i n a l l y adopted, signed by t h e Mayor and Clerk, and sea l ed wi th t h e Corporate Seal.


19. "Land Sa le By-law, 1981, No. 6981" w a s read and reconsidered.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Land Sa le By-law, 1981, No. 6981"

be f i n a l l y adopted, s igned by t h e Mayor and Clerk , and sea l ed wi th t h e Corporate Seal.


20. "Land Purchase And Highway Dedicat ion By-law, 1981, No. 6982" w a s read and reconsidered.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Land Purchase And Highway

Dedication By-law, 1981, No. 6982" be f i n a l l y adopted, s igned by t h e Mayor and Clerk, and sea led wi th t h e Corporate Seal .

Carr ied U RES.NO.1-323

11.

21. "Surrey Indemnities By-law, 1981, No. 6989" w a s read and reconsidered.

RES.NO.1-324

22.

RES.NO.1-325

23

RES.NO.1-326

24.

RES.NO.1-327

25.

RES.NO.1-328

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Surrey Indemnities By-law, 1981,

No. 6989" be f i n a l l y adopted, s igned by t h e Mayor and Clerk, and sea l ed wi th t h e Corporate Seal .

Car r ied wi th Alderman Bose aga ins t .

" P a r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6930" be read and reconsidered.

It was Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Par t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6930" be f i n a l l y adopted, s igned by t h e Mayor and Clerk, and sea l ed wi th t h e Corporate Seal.

Carr ied

"Par t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6929" w a s read and reconsidered.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6929" be f i n a l l y adopted, signed by t h e Mayor and Clerk , and sea l ed wi th t h e Corporate Seal .

Carr ied wi th Aldermen Easton, Bose, and Fomich a g a i n s t .

"Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6976" w a s read and reconsidered.


1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6976" be f i n a l l y adopted, signed by t h e Mayor and Clerk , and sea l ed wi th t h e Corporate Seal .

Carr ied

"Land Purchase And Highway Dedication By-law, 1981, No. 6990" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s

Dedicat ion By-law, 1981,

The s a i d By-law w a s then

Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Easton That "Land Purchase And Highway No. 6990" pass i t s f i r s t reading. Carr ied

read f o r t h e second t i m e .

II

12.

RES.NO.1-329 b

U

RES. NO. 1-330

26.

JUS.NO.1-331

RES.NO.1-332

RES.NO.1-333

27.

RES.NO.1-334

RES.NO.1-335

It w a s

Dedicat ion By-law, 1981,

The s a i d By-law w a s t hen

It w a s

Dedication By-law, 1981,

Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Land Purchase And Highway No. 6990" pass i t s second reading. Carr ied

read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That "Land Purchase And Highway No. 6990" pass i t s t h i r d reading. Car r ied

"Land Purchase By-law, 1981, No. 6991" w a s introduced and read f o r t he f i r s t time.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Fomich That "Land Purchase By-law, 1981, No.

Carried 6991" pass i t s f i r s t reading.

The s a i d By-law w a s t hen

It w a s


Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Easton That "Land Purchase By-law, 1981, No.

6991" pass i t s second reading. Car r ied

The s a i d By-law w a s then read f o r

It w a s Moved by Seconded

t h e t h i r d t i m e .

Alderman Watkins by Alderman Easton

That "Land Purchase By-law, 1981, No.

Car r ied 699 1" pass i t s t h i r d reading.

"Waterworks Construct ion Secur i ty I s su ing By-law, 1981, No. 6992" was introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Waterworks Construct ion Secur i ty

I s su ing By-law, 1981, No. 6992" pass i t s f i r s t reading. Carr ied

The s a i d By-law w a s then read f o r t h e second t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Waterworks Construct ion Secur i ty

I s su ing By-law, 1981, No. 6992" pass i t s second reading. Car r ied

13.

The s a i d By-law w a s t hen read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Easton That 'Waterworks Construct ion Secur i ty

I s su ing By-law, 1981, No. 6992" pass i t s t h i r d reading. RES.NO.1-336 Carr ied

It was then Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e Municipal Finance Author i ty be

advised t h a t t h e Municipal i ty of Surrey has a very s t r o n g i n t e r e s t i n borrowing these funds i n Canadian d o l l a r s .


28. "Sewerage Work Construct ion Secur i ty I s su ing By-law, 1981, No. 6993" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That "Sewerage Work Construct ion Secur i ty

I s su ing By-law, 1981, No. 6993" pass i t s f i r s t reading. RES.NO.1-338 Carr ied

rll

The s a i d By-law w a s t hen read for t h e second t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk

That "Sewerage Work Construct ion Secur i ty Seconded by Alderman Watkins am

I s su ing By-law, 1981, No. 6993" pass i t s second reading. RES.NO.1-339 Carr ied

The s a i d By-law w a s then read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Fomich That "Sewerage Work Construct ion Secur i ty

I s su ing By-law, 1981, No. 6993" pass i t s t h i r d reading. RES.NO.1-340 Carr ied

29. "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6994" w a s introduced and read for t h e f i r s t t i m e .


1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6994" pass i t s f irst reading.


The s a i d By-law was then read for t h e second t i m e .

14.

rr

U

U

It w a s Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6994" pass i t s second reading.


It w a s then Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That t h e Pub l i c Hearing on "Par t 2 of

Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6994" be he ld a t t h e Municipal H a l l on Wednesday, January 13th, 1982, a t 7:30 p.m.


30. "East Panorama Ridge O f f i c i a l Community Plan By-law, 1976, No. 4760, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6995" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That "East Panorama Ridge O f f i c i a l

Community Plan By-law, 1976, No. 4760, Amendment By-law, 1981, NO. 6995" pass i t s f i r s t reading.



It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That "East Panorama Ridge Off i c t a l

Community P lan By-law, 1976, No. 4760, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6995" pass i t s second reading.


It w a s then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e Pub l i c Hearing on " E a s t Panorama

Ridge O f f i c i a l Community Plan By-law, 1976, No. 4760, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6995" be he ld a t t h e Municipal H a l l on Wednesday, January 13th, 1982, a t 7:30 p.m.

RES NO. 1-346 Carr ied

31. "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6996" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It was Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That " P a r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6996" pass i t s f i r s t reading.



It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins

That "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6996" pass i ts second reading.


It was then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e Pub l i c Hearing on "Par t 1 of

Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6996" be he ld a t t h e Municipal H a l l on Wednesday, January 13th, 1982, at 7:30 p.m.


32. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6997" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No.

2265, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6997" pass i t s f i r s t reading. RES.NO.1-350 Carr ied


It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No.

2265, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6997" pass i t s second reading. RES.NO.1-351 Carr ied

It w a s then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e Publ ic Hearing on "Surrey Zoning

By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6997" be he ld a t t h e Municipal H a l l on Wednesday, January 13th, 1982, a t 7:30 p.m.


33. "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6998" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law,




16.

U

Y

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



It was then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Easton That t h e Pub l i c Hearing on "Par t 2 of



34. " P a r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 6999" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Fomich That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,




It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,


RES .NO. 1-357 Carr ied

It w a s then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e Publ ic Hearing on "Part 1 of



35. "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment And NO. 90 Development P e r m i t Area Designation By-law, 1981, No. 7000" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Easton Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Pa r t 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment And No. 90 Development Permit Area Designat ion By-law, 1981, No. 7000" pass i t s f i r s t reading.



17

It w a s Moved by Alderman Easton Seconded by Alderman Watkins

That "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment And No. 90 Development Permit Area Designation By-law, 1981, No. 7000" pass i t s second reading.


It w a s then Moved by Alderman Easton Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e Pub l i c Hearing on "Par t 2 of

Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment And No. 90 Development Permit Area Designation By-law, 1981, No. 7000" be held a t t h e Municipal H a l l on Wednesday, January 13th, 1982, a t 7:30 p.m.

RES-NO. 1-361 Carr ied

36. "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 7001" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Easton Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,


RES. NO. 1-362 Carried

The s a i d By-law was then read f o r t h e second t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Easton Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Par t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



It w a s then Moved by Alderman Easton Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e Pub l i c Hearing on "Par t 1 of



37. "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 7002" w a s introduced and read f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Easton That "Pa r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,



18.


RES.NO.1-366

38.

RES.NO.1-367

Y

RES.NO.1-368

U

RES.NO.1-369

It w a s Moved by Alderman Easton Seconded by Alderman Watkins That " P a r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,


Before t h e motion w a s put:-

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That "Par t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law,

1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 7002" and " P a r t 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, Amendment By-law, 1981, No. 7003" be t ab led and r e f e r r e d t o a Council-in-Committee meeting i n January, and t h a t t h e new Aldermen r ece ive an information packet regarding t h e pre-zoning.

"Land Sa le By-law, 1981, f i r s t t i m e .

It w a s

pass i t s f i r s t reading.


It w a s

pass i t s second reading.


It w a s

pass i t s t h i r d reading.

Carr ied

No. 7004" w a s introduced ana read f o r t he

Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Land Sa le By-law, 1981, No. 7004"

Carr ied



Carr ied

read f o r t h e t h i r d t i m e .


Carr ied

G. MANAGER'S REPORT:

1. The Manager's r epor t under d a t e of December 14, 1981, w a s considered and d e a l t wi th as fol lows:

I t e m 2390

The Manager submitted a r epor t from t h e Parks & Recreat ion Adminis t ra tor dea l ing wi th t h e proposed Newton Indoor Swimming Pool.

19.

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t a t t h e r egu la r meeting of t h e Parks & Recreat ion Commission on December 3 , 1981, concern w a s expressed with t h e r ecen t p u b l i c i t y t h a t Council has decided t o a l l o c a t e funds f o r t he cons t ruc t ion of t h e Newton Indoor Swimming Pool. The fol lowing motion w a s passed by t h e Commission:

I

"That Council be informed of t h e concerns of t h e Parks & Recrea t ion Commission of dev ia t ion from t h e Master Plan as i t concerns t h e proposal f o r an indoor swimming pool a t Newton."

The r e p o r t concluded t h a t t h e Master Plan calls f o r t h e cons t ruc t ion of t h i s f a c i l i t y i n 1984.

It w a s

RES.NO.1-370

Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That t h e information be received. Carr ied

I t e m 2391

The Manager submitted a r epor t from t h e Chief Inspec tor dea l ing with s o i l t h a t has been deposi ted a t 7780 - 152nd S t r e e t .

The r e p o r t noted t h a t t h e s o i l depos i ted on t h i s s i t e w a s material from t h e r econs t ruc t ion of 152x16 S t r e e t , and a pe rmi t w a s i s sued by t h e Permits and Licenses Department t o a l low f i l l i n g to t ake place.

The r e p o r t noted t h a t t h e proper ty i s approximately 4.5 h e c t a r e s i n s i z e and approximately 50 percent of i t s area i s wi th in t h e a g r i c u l t u r a l land reserve.

The r epor t noted t h a t M r . Ned Pot inger of t h e B.C. Land Commission a t tended t h e s i te and ind ica t ed t h a t t h e q u a l i t y of t h e s o i l placed on t h e s i te does not des t roy t h e a g r i c u l t u r a l c a p a b i l i t i e s of t h e land. H e a l s o noted t h a t f i l l i n g of t h e lower areas of t h e proper ty , would probably make a b e t t e r use of t h e land. The r epor t added t h a t M r . Po t inger w a s t o prepare a r e p o r t f o r submission t o t h e Land Commission recommending t h a t t h e s o i l be allowed t o remain, but he would not make a recommendation t h a t would al low removal of t h e land from t h e r e se rve area. The r e p o r t concluded t h a t t h e P e r m i t s and Licenses Department would advise t h e proper ty owner of t h e Land Commission's requi reuents .

It w a s

RES.NO.1-371

I t e m 2392

Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e information be received. Carr ied

The Manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e F i r e Chief dea l ing with t h e White Rock F i r e Department.

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t White Rock s t i l l has t h e s e r v i c e of vo lunteer f i r e f i g h t e r s , a l though they are no longer used as "sleep-ins". The r epor t noted t h a t vo lun tee r s are now used b a s i c a l l y f o r standby and f o r

I

20.

yu

Lr

major f i r e s . house f i r e s .

Paid personnel w a s a l s o t o be c a l l e d back f o r working

The F i r e Chief w a s recommending t h a t t h e two f i r e departments be i n t e g r a t e d under Surrey c o n t r o l , f u l l y u t i l i z i n g t h e new No. 13 H a l l . The White Rock H a l l would then be closed. The r epor t added t h a t o f f i c e space would be provided i n t h e new f i r e h a l l f o r t h e R.C.M.P.

It w a s

RES.NO.1-372

I t e m 2393:

Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e informat ion be received, Carr ied

The Manager submitted a l e t te r from t h e Regional Manager of t h e Railway Transport Committee dea l ing wi th c o a l t r a i n po l lu t ion .

The let ter ind ica t ed t h a t a copy of t h e Munic ipa l i ty ' s correspondence has been forwarded t o t h e Environmental P r o t e c t i o n Serv ice , so they w i l l be aware of t h e Munic ipa l i ty ' s complaint. The le t ter noted t h a t , w h i l e covered t r a n s p o r t would not appear t o be a l i k e l y r e a l i t y i n t h e near f u t u r e , hopefu l ly t h e Environmental P ro tec t ion Serv ice could assist i n i d e n t i f y i n g t h e magnitude of t h e e x i s t i n g problem and then j o i n t e f f o r t s could be made t o minimize t h e occurrence of excess ive emissions. The le t te r concluded t h a t , i n t h e in t e r im , t h e Canadian P a c i f i c Railways were being reminded t h a t i t w a s important , not only t o t h e c i t i z e n s of t h e Municipal i ty , but t o a l l communities through which coa l t r a i n s pass , t h a t e x i s t i n g procedures developed t o minimize p o l l u t i o n must be continued t o be monitored and adhered to .

The Manager ind ica t ed t h a t a copy of t h i s l e t t e r should be forwarded t o t h e Panorama Ridge/Sul l ivan Local Area Planning Committee.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e information be received and a

copy of t h i s l e t t e r be forwarded t o t h e Panorama Etidge/Sullivan Local Area Planning Committee.


I t e m 2 3 9 4 :

The Manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Deputy Di rec to r of Planning, Long Range & Research, dea l ing wi th areas excluded from t h e Prezoning Proposal.

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t on May 11, 1981, Council passed a motion t o i n s t r u c t t h e Manager and Planner t o prepare a r epor t on t h e f e a s i b i l i t y of prezoning a l l planned r e s i d e n t i a l land having a proposed land use of R-F and lesser d e n s i t i e s . Consequently, a r e p o r t w a s prepared recommending t h a t t h e p r o p e r t i e s which are p resen t ly wi th in t h e Urban Development Areas and are w i t h i n a convenient and d i r e c t access t o t h e r e spec t ive town cen t r e s be prezoned. The r epor t noted t h a t two areas,

21.

which were wi th in t h e Urban Development Area, were not included i n t h e prezoning f o r t h e fol lowing reasons:

1. The exc lus ion of t hese areas i s cons i s t en t wi th Counci l ' s po l icy t o e s t a b l i s h i d e n t i f i a b l e towns.

2. The areas recommended f o r prezoning, wi th the exc lus ion of t hese two areas, are those , t o t h e best knowledge of t h e Planning Department, which w i l l not r e s u l t i n f u r t h e r debate wi th regara t o Counci l ' s po l i cy t o e s t a b l i s h i d e n t i f i a b l e towns and w i l l not pre judice t h e community p l an now i n prepara t ion .

3. The areas excluded from t h e prezoning proposal r e q u i r e f u r t h e r s tudy and may be proposed f o r prezoning a f t e r due cons idera t ion .

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h e two areas remain excluded a t t h i s t i m e and t h a t they be d e a l t wi th when t h e O f f i c i a l Community Plan i s considered.

It w a s

approved. RES-NO. 1-374

Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Easton That t h e recommendation of t h e Manager be

Carr ied wi th Alderman Schrenk aga ins t .

I t e m 2395:

The manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Municipal Engineer dea l ing wi th a de lega t ion t o Council by M r . R. B e l l i n i .

rl

M r . B e l l i n i had been concerned wi th speeding t ra f f ic on 24th Avenue and t h e l a c k of sidewalks on 24th Avenue, between 128th and 135th S t r e e t s .

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h i s s e c t i o n of 24th Avenue has a 20-foot wide pavement wi th g rave l shoulders approximately 5 feet i n width and d i t c h e s on both s ides . The posted speed l i m i t i s 50kph, reduced t o 30 kph i n t h e v i c i n i t y of t h e school , and e x i s t i n g t r a f f i c vcilume i s approximately 2,000 v e h i c l e s pe r day. The r e p o r t added t h a t t h e r e i s an a s p h a l t sidewalk on t h e no r th s i d e of 24th Avenue, between 128th and 132nd S t r e e t s , and a concre te sidewalk from 132nd t o 134th S t r e e t s . The r e p o r t noted t h a t it would be d e s i r a b l e t o extend t h e sidewalk a t t h i s l o c a t i o n t o 136th S t r e e t o r 140th S t r e e t . However, because of o t h e r p r i o r i t i e s , t h i s s e c t i o n of sidewalk w a s not included i n Level 1 o r Level 2 of t h e proposed 1982 Budget. The r e p o r t concluded t h a t t h e p r i o r i t y f o r t h i s sidewalk would be reviewed wi th t h e School Board and the reques t f o r increased enforcement of t h e speed l i m i t would be r e f e r r e d t o t h e R.C.M.P.

The Manager ind ica t ed t h a t a copy of t h i s r epor t should be forwarded t o M r . B e l l i n i .

22.

It w a s

a copy of RFS.NO.1-375

I t e m 2396

Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Fomich That t h e information be received and t h a t

Carr ied t h i s r epor t be forwarded t o M r . B e l l i n i .

The Manager submitted a r epor t dea l ing wi th t h e de lega t ion of M r . T. Lee regard ing rezoning f o r a proposed Self-serve Gasoline S t a t i o n a t 19186 - 96th Avenue.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t Council recons ider i t s dec i s ion not t o rezone t h e proper ty from C-G t o C-G(l).

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Fomich That Council recons ider t h e rezoning of

proper ty a t 19186 - 96th Avenue from C-G t o C-G(l).

RES.NO.1-376 This motion w a s Defeated wi th Aldermen Schrenk, Whit taker , and Fomich aga ins t . This motion d id not have t h e necessary two-thirds major i ty f o r recons idera t ion .

I t e m 2397:

The Manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Municipal Clerk dea l ing wi th Refund of Taxes f o r 1981.

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e fo l lowing p r o p e r t i e s had been charged,under S t r e e t L ight ing Frontage By-law No. 2255, and the p r o p e r t i e s were not w i th in 60 metres of a street l i g h t . Clerk w a s recommending t h a t t h e fo l lowing p r o p e r t i e s be refunded t h e S t r e e t Light ing Levy as fo l lows:

The Municipal

Lr

Fol io NO. 6344-01008-3 REICH, Kurt & L i l l i e 15014 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B.C. V3R 524

Fo l io No. 6344-0201 2-X SANREGRET, Karen & Franc i s 627 Chippewa Road Leduc, Alber ta T9E 1T8

Fo l io NO. 6344-04008-2 WARLIMONT, Joseph B. 10671 - 128 S t r e e t Surrey, B.C. V3T 229

Taxable

20 metres 1981 $16.92

20 metres

20 metres

16.92

16.92

23.

d ) F o l i o NO. 6344-04008-7 SPORAR, Frank & Milka 15044 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B . C . V3R 1E9

e ) F o l i o No. 6344-05010-X McMILLAN, Selwyn & Janice 15054 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B.C. V3R 1E9

f) F o l i o No. 6344-06008-6 BONESKY, Shereen POWERS, James 15064 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B.C. V3R 1E9

g ) F o l i o NO. 6344-07008-0 KRASNOFF, P e t e r 9492 - 159A Avenue Surrey , B . C . V3R 4M9

h ) F o l i o NO. 6344-08008-5 WIRSZ, Lyle & Deborah 15080 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B.C. V3R 1E9

i ) Fo l io NO. 6344-09008-X BONKOWSKI, Richard & Ruth 15090 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B . C . V3R 1E9

j) F o l i o No. 6344-10008-4 VOLPIANA, Alexander 7 Diana 15102 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B.C. V3R 1E9

k ) F o l i o NO. 6344-11008-9 WARLIMONT, George & L i l l i a n 10671 - 128 S t r e e t Surrey, B.C. V3T 229

1) Fo l io NO. 6344-12008-3 COYLE, James & Lois 15120 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B.C. V3R 1E9

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

16.92

16.92

16.92

16.92

16.92

16.92

16.92

16.92

16.92

3

24.

i.

mm

F o l i o NO. 6344-13008-8 20 metres 1492 INVESTMENTS 1005 - 750 West Pender Vancouver, B.C.

F o l i o NO. 6344-14008-2 20 metres 1492 INVESTMENTS 1005 - 750 West Pender Vancouver, B. C.

Fol io NO. 6344-1 5010-5 20 metres MICHAL, Miroslav & Karen 15148 - 96 Avenue Surrey, B.C. V3R 1E9

16.92

16.92

16.92

F o l i o No. 6214-61504-7 MORIN, Angus 7619 - 144 S t r e e t Surrey, B.C.

F o l i o NO. 5123-90018-4 BONSER, Hazen F. 202 - 1554 George S t r e e t White Rock, B.C. V4A 1S6

F o l i o NO. 1300-06004-9 HIRSCH, Andrew & Barbara 10336-38 145A S t r e e t Surrey, B.C. V3R 3S1

F o l i o NO. 2300-54002-2 HADGRAFT, Edward & Anne 11786 - 99A Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3v 2Rl

20 metres 1980 16.92 1981 16.92

20 metres 1981 16.92

20 metres

20 metres

16.92

16.92

NOTE: I t e m s ) i s a panhandle l o t and w i l l be d e l e t e d from the f ron tage r o l l s a t t h e next Court of Revision.

Fo l io NO. 6342-73502-5 20 metres 1980 16.92 UPHAL, Gurdial & Jasv inder 1981 16.92 14771 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

F o l i o NO. 6342-74002-1 20 metres 1980 16.92 DUMAS, Sharon 1981 16.92 14763 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

25.

F o l i o NO. 6342-74502-X WATT, Ronald & Susan 14757 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

F o l i o NO. 6342-75002-6 KILISTOFF, Nick & Johanna 14747 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

F o l i o NO. 6342-75102-X GOODMAN, Robert & Corinne 14735 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

F o l i o NO. 6342-75202-3 BASIC, Steve 14725 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

F o l i o NO. 6342-75302-7 PROULX, Rene & Gale 14715 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

F o l i o NO. 6342-75402-0 JACKSON, Reynold S. 14705 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

F o l i o NO. 6342-75502-4 McCARGAR, Be t ty F. 14695 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

F o l i o NO. 6342-75602-8 WARBURTON, Charles & K r i s t i n 14685 - 88 Avenue Surrey, B.C. v3s 2s2

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

20 metres

1980 1981

1980

1980 1981

1980 1981

1980 1981

1980 1981

1980 1981

1980 1981

16.92 16.92

16.92

16.92 16.92

16.92 16.92

16.92 16.92

16.92 16.92

16.92 16.92

16.92 16.92

rrr

II

26.

dd) Folio NO. 6342-75702-1 20 metres 1980 16.92 DISTRICT OF SURREY 1981 16.92

The report added that the following properties had been charged, under the Sewer Frontage By-law No. 2183 as amended by By-law No. 5879, but these properties were unable to connect to the sanitary sewer. Municipal Clerk was recommending that the taxes be refunded as follows:

The

1) Folio No. 5132-98002-8 20 metres 1981 $60.00 RAINTREE CONSTRUCTION 1266 - Finlay Street White Rock, B.C. V4B 4L1

2) Folio NO. 5132-98003-X 20 metres 1981 $60.00 WATSON, Mark & Elke 16149 - 16th Avenue Surrey, B.C. V4A 1S6

The Manager was recommending that the taxes be refunded as indicated in the Municipal Clerk's report.

It was

approved. RES.NO.1-377

Item 2398:

Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That the recommendation of the Manager be

Carried

The Manager submitted a report from the Chief Inspector dealing with proposed additions and renovations to the Museum in 1982.

The report indicated that the cost estimates were as follows:

Stage V:

1 .

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Extension of the west lobby

Extension of the east lobby

Extension of existing joint room to accommodate additional work space and storage room

Relocation of the log hcuse

Resurfacing of approach to the main entrance

New museum sign

Landscaping

Design and administration Total Stage V

$ 25,000

40,000

15,000

3,000

7,000

1,000

1,000

10,000 $105,000

27.

Starre VI:

1. Addition to the main exhibit hall

2. Additional landscaping

$160,000

5,000 mm

3. Design and administration 20,000

Total Stage VI $185,000

The Manager was recommending that this matter be referred for consideration in the 1982 Budget.

It was


Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That the recommendation of the Manager be

Carried

Item 2399:

The Manager submitted a report from the Chief Inspector dealing with the Five Oaks Trailer Park at 2120 King George Highway.

The report indicated that the letter of complaint from Mr. G . C . Poss was referred to Hunter, Laird & Associates, the engineering consultants for the trailer court. The consultants advised the Permits and Licenses Department that on November 25, 1981, the developer agreed to raise the pad, as requested by Mr. Poss, and that the work would be started forthwith.

I.I

It was Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Easton That the information be received and that

a copy of this report be forwarded to Mr. Poss. RES.NO.1-379 Carried

Item 2400:

The Manager submitted a report from the Municipal Engineer dealing with a revision of the Water Service Connection Fees.

The report indicated that the water connection fees have not been increased since 1976 and with the increasing cost of installation, in comparison with the fixed fee collected, the water utility has had to pick up the increasing deficit annually. structure established in 1976 remained adequate for some years, to defray the cost of a standard house connection. increase in the cost of labour and material, the cost has risen from $180.00 in 1976 to $350.00 in 1981, creating a situation whereby the utility effectively subsidizes the installation of services. The report pointed out that 64 percent of the subsidy goes to the benefit

watermains. The Engineer indicated that a stage increase would be a

The report added that the fee

With the rapid

of the developers creating new lots fronting existing Municipal rl

28.

more appropr i a t e method t o r ed res s t h e annual d e f i c i t .

Ir

U

The Municipal Engineer w a s recommending t h a t t h e f e e f o r t h e s tandard 18 m m house connections t o e x i s t i n g l o t s be increased:

From $180.00 t o $275.00 f o r 1982 t o $400.00 f o r 1983 t o $500.00 f o r 1984 t o $600.00 f o r 1985

The Municipal Engineer f u r t h e r recommended t h a t By-law No. 2932 be amended t o r e f l e c t t h e new charges.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t By-law No. 2932 be amended t o inc rease t h e c o s t of t h e 3 /4 i nch connection t o e x i s t i n g l o t s t o $400.00, and a l l t h e o t h e r connect ions be a t cos t .

It w a s


I t e m 2401:

Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Bose That t h e recommendation of t h e Manager be

Carr ied

The Manager submitted a le t ter from t h e Deputy School Dis t r ic t 36 dea l ing wi th t h e Kensington Supply

The l e t t e r ind ica t ed t h a t t h e School Board was

Secretary-Treasurer of P r a i r i e School Water

w i l l i n g t o submit a C a p i t a l Expense reques t f o r $44,000.00 as t h e Board's sha re of the cos t of extending an over-s ized watermain on 168th S t r e e t t o provide Kensington P r a i r i e Elementary School wi th an adequate water supply.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h e ex tens ion of t he watermain, at an est imated cos t of $175,750.00, be considered i n t h e 1982 Budget and t h a t School Dis t r ic t 36 be s o advised.

It w a s

approved RES.NO. 1-381

I t e m 2402:

Moved by Alderman Wstkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e recommendation of t h e Manager Le

Carr ied

The Manager submitted a r epor t from t h e Municipal Engineer dea l ing wi th a complaint on t h e condi t ion of 68A Avenue and 135th S t r e e t by Mrs. V. Dadson.

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e d i s r u p t i o n i n t h i s area has been caused by a development i n s t a l l i n g s a n i t a r y sewer s e r v i c e s and t h e cons t ruc t ion of roads. The r epor t noted t h a t t h e r e s i d e n t s w e r e made aware of t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of inconvenience, before t h e work commenced.

29 .

The r epor t noted t h a t t h e developer has now f i n i s h e d t h e engineer ing work on 68A Avenue and 135th S t r e e t and t h e Municipal i ty would undertake works, which would r e i n s t a t e t h e area t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n of t he r e s i d e n t s . The Manager recommended t h a t M r s . Dadson r ece ive a copy of both of t h e

- Engineer 's r epor t s .

It w a s


Moved by S e c onde d That t h e

Carr ied

Alderman Watkins by Alderman Fomich reconpnendqtion of t h e Manager be

I t e m 2403:

The Manager submitted a r epor t from t h e Municipal Engineer dea l ing with a reques t f o r T r a f f i c S igna l L igh t s , S t r e e t L ight ing , and Sidewalks a t t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n of t h e F rase r Highway and 148th Street .

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e t r a f f i c volumes on 148th S t r e e t were s u b s t a n t i a l l y increased as a r e s u l t of i t s use as a de tour around t h e cons t ruc t ion zone on 96th Avenue. and 96th Avenue i s open t o through t r a f f i c . The r epor t added t h a t 148th S t r e e t i s now continuous between 84th Avenue and l l l A Avenue. As a r e s u l t , t r a f f i c volumes on 148th S t r e e t have increased . The r epor t noted t h a t f o r t h i s reason, t h e Engineering Department has requested t h a t t h e P rov inc ia l Minis t ry of Transpor ta t ion and Highways eva lua te t h e warrant f o r t r a f f i c s i g n a l s a t t h e F r a s e r Highway and 148th S t r e e t . I n connection with t h e provis ion of sidewalks and s t r e e t l i g h t s , t h e r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t funds have been a l l o c a t e d i n t h e 1982 Budget for t hese works t o be completed on t h e east s i d e of 148th S t r e e t between t h e F rase r Highway and 88th Avenue. Ditches on both s i d e s of 148th S t r e e t w i l l be enclosed i n t h i s s e c t i o n a t t h e same t i m e .

Construct ion has now been completed

It w a s

Engineer 's r epor t . RES.NO.1-383

I t e m 2404:

Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Fouich That M r . Boyce r ece ive a copy of t he

Carr ied

The Manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Chief Inspec tor dea l ing with t h e cos t of process ing Por t ab le Sign Permit Fees.

The r epor t noted t h a t i t w i l l t ake t h e Sign Clerk approximately one hour t o process t h e permit and t h e By-law Enforcement Of f i ce r w i l l spend approximately two hours of h i s t i m e checking t o see t h a t t h e s i g n can be i n s t a l l e d i n compliance wi th t h e By-law, as w e l l as t o ensure t h a t t h e s i g n i s removed a t t h e proper t i m e . The r e p o r t added t h a t , i f l e g a l proceedings are taken i n t o cons ide ra t ion , f o r those ones who do not remove t h e s i g n a t t h e end of t h e appropr i a t e per iod , t he t ine consumed would be considerably g r e a t e r . The Chief Inspec tor w a s mm

30.

recommending t h a t t h e f e e f o r t h e Por t ab le Sign Permit be increased from $20.00 t o $60.00 f o r e i t h e r t h e 30-day o r 90-day p e r m i t s .

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h e f e e be increased from $20.00 t o $35.00.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Bose That t h e f e e f o r t h e Por tab le Sign P e r m i t

be increased from $20.00 t o $60.00.

Before t h i s motion w a s put:-

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e f e e s be pro-rated wi th the

3 0 d a y Permit c o s t i n g $20.00, t h e 60-day Permit cos t ing $40.00, and t h e 90-day Permit cos t ing $60.00.

RES.NO.1-384 This motion w a s Defeated wi th Aldermen Schrenk, Whit taker , Easton, Bose and Fomich a g a i n s t .

The o r i g i n a l motion w a s then put and:- RES. NO. 1-385 Carr ied

I t e m 2405: Y

The Mznager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Chief Inspec tor dea l ing wi th a l e t te r received from t h e Canadian Por t land Cement Associat ion.

The r epor t noted t h a t t h e Municipal i ty of Richmond i n s e r t e d i n t o t h e i r by-laws, a r e l a x a t i o n f o r f i rms who u t i l i z e a l t e r n a t e energy technologies , such as pass ive s o l a r , i n t h e cons t ruc t ion of t h e i r bu i ld ings . The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h i s i n c e n t i v e was to permit a reduct ion i n the f l o o r area r a t i o . The r e p o r t pointed out t h a t such a by-law would be d i f f i c u l t t o enforce.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h i s matter not be persued f u r t h e r regarding f l o o r area r a t i o and t h a t t h e Assoc ia t ion be so advised.

Iy

It w a s


I t e m 2406:

Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e recommendation of t h e Manager be

Carr ied

The Manager submitted a r epor t from t h e Municipal Engineer dea l ing with t h e Tender Award under Contract MS 9.4.81 concerning t h e cons t ruc t ion of t h e East Whalley Ring Road between 105th Avenue and 108th Avenue.

31

The r e p o r t noted t h a t t h e fo l lowing t ende r s were rece ived on November 17, 1981:

Tender Value Corrected Result

Langley Developments Ltd. Goodbrand Cons t ruc t ion Ltd. B e l Cons t ruc t ion Ltd. Winvan Paving L td . Columbia B i t u l i t h i c Ltd. Standard General Cons t ruc t ion Ltd. Castle Concrete Ltd. Miller Cont rac t ing Ltd. B & B Trucking Ltd. A & G Const ruc t ion Ltd.

$ 402,879.60 422,908.00 427,766.00 437,806.00 433,900.70 444,497.00 473,497.00 473,549.70 509,550.00 558,814.50

$ 402,879.60 422,908.00 427,766.00 437,806.00 443,900.70 444,653.00 473,497.00 469,450.54 509,550.00 558,814.50

The r e p o r t noted t h a t , due t o t h e f a c t t h a t Langley Developments Ltd. have l i m i t e d exper ience i n t h i s type of work, Aplin and Martin Engineering a n t i c i p a t e an a d d i t i o n a l c o s t of $6,000.00 €or engineer ing , because of increased i n s p e c t i o n t i m e . However, t h e next lower b idder , Goodbrand Cons t ruc t ion Ltd., w a s $20,202.84 higher.

The r e p o r t noted t h a t t h i s c o n t r a c t i nc ludes d i t c h e l imina t ion , road widening t o 14 metres, complete wi th curb and g u t t e r , and sidewalk on both s i d e s , on t h e East Whalley Ring Road (137th S t r e e t ) from 105th Avenue t o 108th Avenue.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h e t ende r be awarded t o Langley Developments Ltd. i n t h e amount of $402,879.60.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Easton That Contract MS 9.4.81 be awarded to

Langley Developments Ltd. i n t h e amount of $402,879.60; and that: the Mayor and Clerk be au thor ized t o s i g n the c o n t r a c t documents.


I t e m 2407:

The Manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Chief Inspec to r d e a l i n g wi th a Multi-Purpose Room f o r t h e Bridgeview Elementary School.

The r e p o r t noted t h a t t h e following p r i c e s were rece ived for t h e cons t ruc t ion of t h e Multi-Purpose Room a t t h e Bridgeview Elementary School :

Dewey DeVries Cons t ruc t ion $ 64,942.00 Crestwood Cons t ruc t ion 65,481 e00 B i l l Mathers Cont rac t ing - $2,600.00 68,850.00

f o r hea t ing no t included

32.

Addi t iona l Cost:

IL Fraser River P i l e Driving Northwest P i l e Driving

4,200.00 5,400.00

Projec ted Cost:

Construct ion - Dewey DeVries 64,942.00 P i l e Driving - Frase r River P i l e Driving + 4,200.00

P ro jec t Contingency 7,000.00 S t r u c t u r a l Design 2,000.00

T o t a l Pro jec ted Cost $ 78,142.00

The Manager ind ica t ed t h a t t h e Chief Inspec to r , I n d u s t r i a l D i rec to r , and t h e Treasurer have been given a u t h o r i t y t o proceed.

It w a s

RES.NO.1-388

Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Easton That t h e information be received. Carr ied

It was then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That a copy of t h i s r e p o r t be forwarded

t o t h e Bridgeview Community Associat ion. - RES.NO.1-389

L

I t e m 2408:

The Manager submitted

The Manager ind ica t ed requirements had been

Carr ied

a r e p o r t dea l ing wi th S i t e Area Requirements.

t h a t t h e 3rd Legal Opinion regard ing s i t e area submitted f o r Counci l ' s cons idera t ion .

A le t ter from t h e Municipal S o l i c i t o r i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e f i r m of F a r r i s , Vaughan, Wills & Murphy had confirmed h i s opinion r e l a t i n g t o Sect ion 717(2) (a-k).

The Manager ind ica t ed t h a t h i s recommendations on t h e s i t e areas were as fol lows:

SITE AREA REQUIREMENTS - BY-LAW 5942

W G ) 1 acre gross d e n s i t y - present s i t e area 4 HA- reduce t o 1 HA t o prevent s i n g l e l o t subdiv is ion .

RH( G) 1 /2 acre gross d e n s i t y - present s i t e area 2 HA - reduce t o 1 HA t o prevent s i n g l e l o t subdiv is ion .

W(C) Compact housing - present s i te area 2 HA - reduce t o 1 HA.

33.

RT- 1

RM-1

RM-2

RM-3

RM-4

c-c

C-D

P-P

PA

Townhouse Zone - presen t s i t e area 2.5 acres - change t o 1 HA.

Low rise mul t ip l e - present s i t e area 1.7 acres - d e l e t e - d area requirements p r e s e n t l y i n t h e zone.

Medium rise mul t ip l e - present s i t e area 1000 M2 - d e l e t e - area requirements p re sen t ly i n t h e zone.

High rise - present s i te area 1000 M2 - l eave as i s or inc rease t o 2000 ~ 2 .

High Rise - present s i t e area 1000 M2 - l eave as i s o r inc rease t o 2000 ~ 2 .

Core commercial - present s i te area 1300 M2 - reduce t o 1000 M2.

Comprehensive zones 1-2-3 - present s i t e area - 4 HA and 2 HA f o r compact housing - reduce t o 1 HA.

Personal Care - presen t s i t e area 1400 M2 - reduce t o 1000 M2.

Church and assembly - present s i t e area - 890 M2 - i nc rease t o 1000 M2.

The Manager a l s o ind ica t ed t h a t t h e parking and dens i ty i n t h e RM-1 m a

Zone should be 25 u n i t s per acre wi th underground parking, and f o r t h e RM-2 Zone should be 45 u n i t s pe r acre with underground parking.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h i s matter be r e f e r r e d t o the

January 4 , 1982, Council-in Committee meeting f o r a f i r m recommendation back t o Council.


I t e m 2409:

The Manager submitted a r epor t dea l ing wi th a proposed Day Care Zone.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h e fol lowing d r a f t PP(1) Zone be approved.

PART XXIX(A) - P-P(1) DAY CARE INSTITUTIONAL ZONE

A. INTENT

This zone i s intended f o r day care f a c i l i t i e s i n t e g r a t e d i n t o a r e s i d e n t i a l community, s u b j e c t t o t h e provis ions of t h e Community Care F a c i l i t y A c t , R.S.B.C.

U

34.

B. PERMITTED USES

Lr Land and s t r u c t u r e s s h a l l be used f o r t h e fol lowing uses only; o r f o r a combination of such uses :

1 . Play school and o t h e r f a c i l i t i e s f o r day care c h i l d r e n provided however t h a t no overnight accommodation s h a l l be provided.

2. S ingle family dwelling.

3. Accessory bui ld ings and s t r u c t u r e s .

C. LAND DEVELOPMENT

Notwithstanding any o the r provis ion of t h i s zone, t h e uses permit ted by Sec t ion B s h a l l be cond i t iona l upon t h e immediate a v a i l a b i l i t y and adequacy of those Municipal f a c i l i t i e s and s e r v i c e s h e r e i n a f t e r set f o r t h t o serve each pa rce l of land and each u n i t of every bu i ld ing , s t r u c t u r e and use t o be e r e c t e d , placed o r c a r r i e d on thereon. No use of land and no use of any bui1din.g o r s t r u c t u r e thereon s h a l l be deemed t o be au thor ized by Sec t ion B of t h i s zone, and a l l uses otherwise permit ted by t h i s By-law are hereby p roh ib i t ed un le s s and u n t i l a l l of t he fo l lowing s e r v i c e s and f a c i l i t i e s have been provided and are immediately a v a i l a b l e and are adequate t h e r e f o r t o t h e s tandards set out as fo l lows : cw 1 . Sani ta ry sewer, waterworks and dra inage works s h a l l be

provided and cons t ruc ted t o t h e s tandards set out f o r t he P-P( 1) zone i n "Surrey Subdivis ion By-law No. 5944."

2. A l l highways a b u t t i n g and se rv ing t h e land inc luding boulevards, street l i g h t i n g , underground wir ing , s idewalks, t r a n s i t s e r v i c e f a c i l i t i e s s h a l l be provided and cons t ruc ted t o the s tandards set out f o r t h e P-P(l) zone i n "Surrey Subdivis ion By-law No. 5944."

D. DENSITY

The maximum d e n s i t y s h a l l no t exceed a f l o o r area r a t i o of zero decimal f i v e (0.5).

E. SITE COVERAGE

1. The amount of land covered by p r i n c i p a l bu i ld ings s h a l l not exceed t h i r t y - t h r e e ( 3 3 ) percent of t h e developed si te.

2. The amount of land covered by p r i n c i p a l bu i ld ings , accessory bu i ld ings , parking spaces and driveways s h a l l not exceed s i x t y ( 6 0 ) percent of t h e developed s i te .

35.

F. SUBDIVISION

1. Lot s i z e : The minimum l o t s i z e s h a l l be s i x hundred and s i x t y (660) square metres ( 7 , 2 0 0 s q . f t ) .

2. Lot width: The minimum l o t width s h a l l be seven decimal f i v e (7 .5 ) metres (60 f t . ) .

G. HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES

1 . P r i n c i p a l bu i ld ings and s t r u c t u r e s : The he ight of any p r i n c i p a l bu i ld ing o r s t r u c t u r e s h a l l not exceed t en (10) metres (33 f t . ) o r two ( 2 ) s to reys .

2. Accessory bui ld ings and s t r u c t u r e s : The he ight of any accessory bu i ld ing o r s t r u c t u r e s h a l l not exceed f o u r ( 4 ) metres ( 1 8 f t . ) o r one ( 1 ) s to rey .

H. YARDS AND SETBACKS

Buildings and s t r u c t u r e s s h a l l be s i t u a t e d as h e r e i n a f t e r set f o r t h :

1. Front yard: The minimum f r o n t yard s h a l l be seven decimal f i v e (7 .5) m e t r e s ( 2 5 f t . ) .

2. Rear yard: (7 .5) metres (25 f t . ) .

Side yard: The minimum s i d e yard s h a l l be t h r e e decimal s i x ( 3 . 6 ) metres (12 f t . ) , provided t h a t where no l a n e e x i s t s g iv ing access t o t h e rear yard , one s i d e yard s h a l l be l e f t clear f o r t h e purpose of emergency vehicu lar access, and f u r t h e r provided t h a t t h e s i d e yard s h a l l be increased t o not less than seven decimal f i v e (7 .5) metres (25 f t . ) on t h e s i d e l o t l i n e f r o n t i n g onto a f l ank ing street.

The minimum rear yard s h a l l be seven decimal f i v e

mw 3.

4 . Setback of accessory bui ld ings : A l l accessory bui ld ings and s t r u c t u r e s s h a l l be loca t ed a minimum of t h r e e ( 3 ) metres ( 1 0 f t . ) from t h e nea res t p roper ty l i n e of an ad jo in ing l o t o r s t r u c t u r e , and no accessory bu i ld ing o r s t r u c t u r e s h a l l be loca t ed wi th in any yard f r o n t i n g on a street.

I. LANDSCAPING

1. A l l po r t ions of t h e s i te not covered by bu i ld ings , s t r u c t u r e s and parking areas s h a l l be s u i t a b l y landscaped and reasonably maintained t o a s tandard compatible wi th t h e approved s i te plans.

2. A s o l i d fence of no t less than one decimal two ( 1 . 2 ) metres ( 4 f t . ) high s h a l l be provided along t h e rear and s i d e proper ty l i n e s .

W

36.

J. OFF-STREET PARKING

No o f f - s t r e e t parking s h a l l be permit ted i n a f r o n t yard.

It w a s

approved.

Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Bose That t h e recommendation of t h e Manager be

It w a s then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That a copy of t h e proposed zone be s e n t

t o t h e Clayton Community Assoc ia t ion f o r t h e i r information. RES.NO.1-391 Carr ied

I t e m 2410:

The Manager subn i t t ed a r e p o r t from t h e Deputy Direc tor of Planning - Long Range 6 Research, dea l ing wi th t h e proposed rezoning of Remainder 2 , Block 9, District Lots 3 & 4, Plan 886, NWD, being 10867 Scot t Road.

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e proper ty a t 10867 Sco t t Road was rezoned from 1-1 t o I -G , which d i d not a l low t h e ope ra t ion of s to rage and sales of used t rucks and automobiles. The present owner of t h e proper ty , Tr ico En te rp r i se s Ltd., w e r e reques t ing t h a t t h e proper ty be rezoned t o I-T Transporat ion I n d u s t r i a l Zone t o permit t h e opera t ion of s to rage and sales of used t rucks and automobiles.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t Remainder 2 , Block 9 , District Lots 3 and 4, Plan 886, NWD, be rezoned from I -G t o I-T.

It w a s


Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaber That t h e recommendation of the Manager be

Carr ied

I t e m 2411:

The Manager submitted a r epor t from t h e Manager, Adminis t ra t ive Services - Planning, dea l ing wi th Development Permit 6081-048 with Fleetwood Plaza Holdings Ltd.

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e provis ions of Development Permit 80-DP-19 are amended as fol lows:

1. To supplement Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, P a r t 34, Sec t ion L wi th a s i t e p lan numbered 6781-048 ( 1 ) showing t h e l o c a t i o n of t h e s ign.

2. To vary Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942, P a r t 5, Sec t ion C wi th a s i g n design numbered 6781-048 (2 ) . The he ight of t h i s s i g n

37.

is 12 feet, the width of the sign band is 6 feet, and the width of the sign base is 10 feet.

The Manager was recommending that the amendment to the Development Permit be approved.

It was Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That Council approve Development Permit

Amendment 6081-048, that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to sign the Development Permit Amendment, and that Council authorize the transfer of the permit to the heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns of the title of the land within the terms of the Permit.


Item 2412:

The Manager submitted eight rezoning applications and he concurred with the recommendations of the Planner in each instance. In connection with Applications 5681-385 & 5681-386, the Manager indicated he had received a letter stating that the developers were prepared t o extend the services to the subdivision, pursuant to the requirements of the subdivision by-law.

1 . Application 5681-014 is an application for rezoning from RS to R-F and I-G to permit subdivision of Lot 32, Southwest Quarter, Section 30, Township 2 , Plan 31118, NWD, being 8017 - 124th Street, into 1 duplex lot, 1 single family lot, and 1 industrial lot. the site are as follows:

The report indicated that the present plan designations for

(a) Official Regional Plan - Urban (b) Official Community Plan - Urban

(c) The Newton Plan - Residential fronting 80th Avenue and Industrial for the remainder of the site.

The Director of Planning was recommending that this application be approved to proceed for rezoning from RS to RF for the south 44.13 metres and I-G for the remaining portion of the property, subject to:

(a) Redesign of subdivision to provide a lane parallel to 80th Avenue ;

( b ) Provision of landscape buffer strip;

3

(c) Provision of required Engineering Services at subdivision stage.

38.

Such approval to be valid for six months from this date.

Lr

U

U

2. Application 5681-383 is an application for rezoning from R-S to I - G to permit the construction of an auto-body shop on Lot 33, Southwest Quarter, Section 30, Township 2, Plan 31118, NWD, being 8065 - 124th Street.

The report indicated that the present plan designations for the site are as follows:

(a) Official Regional Plan - Industrial

(b) Official Community Plan - Urban

(c) Proposed Newton Plan - Industrial with a landscape strip along the west property line to provide a buffer between the industrial and residential area.

The Director of Planning was recommending that this application be approved to proceed for rezoning from R-S to I -G , pursuant to Section 716 of the Municipal Act, subject to:

(a) Declaration of the site as a Development Permit Area to ensure the provision of the landscaped buffer strip; and

(b) Resolution of the concerns of the Engineering Department regarding adequate services.


3. Application 5681-391 is an application for rezoning from R-S to R-P(R) to permit a 17 lot subdivision on Lot 26, Southwest Quarter, Section 17, Township 2, Plan 2163, NWD, being 6509 - 130th Street.

The report indicated that the site is designated Urban on the Official Regional and Community Plans, and is within the Urban Development Area. The draft Newton Concept Plan and Control Plan 61 designate the site f o r single family housing. The Director of Planning was recommending that this application be approved to proceed for rezoning from R-S to R-F(R), pursuant to Section 716 of the Municipal Act, subject to submission of a Site Plan revised to R-F(R) standards.


4. Application 5681-553 is an application for rezoning from R-S to R-F to permit construction of a duplex on Lot 6, Block 8, Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 2, Plan 21256, NWD, being 9511 - 150th Street.

The report noted that the Official Community and Regional Plans both designate the property Urban, and it is within the Urban Development Area. The draft Fleetwood Plan shows this area as

39.

Urban Res iden t i a l .

The Direc tor of Planning w a s recommending t h i s app l i ca t ion be approved t o proceed f o r rezoning from R-S t o R-F, pursuant t o Sect ion 716 of t h e Municipal A c t , sub jec t t o ded ica t ion of t he n o r t h e r l y po r t ion which cannot be developed, o r by a right-of-way t o ensure pub l i c access ac ross t h e property.

Such approval t o be v a l i d f o r s i x months from t h i s date .

5. Appl ica t ion 5681-594 is an a p p l i c a t i o n f o r rezoning from C-G t o C-G(1) t o permit a se l f - serve gas s t a t i o n on Por t ion of Lot 1, Northeast Quarter , Sec t ion 14, Township 1, Plan 6136, NWD, being 2178 King George Highway.

The r epor t noted t h a t t h i s w i l l be t h e f i r s t phase of a development t h a t w i l l a l s o inc lude a car repair s e r v i c e and f u l l s e r v i c e gas bays. The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e present p l an des igna t ions f o r t h e s i te are as fo l lows:

( a ) O f f i c i a l Regional Plan - Urban

(b) O f f i c i a l Community Plan - Urban

( c ) South Surrey Plan - Service Commercial

(d) Proposed Semiahmoo Peninsula Plan - Highway Commercial

(e) The s i te i s wi th in t h e Urban Development Area.

The Di rec to r of Planning w a s recommending t h a t t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n be approved t o proceed f o r rezoning from C-G t o C-G(1), pursuant t o provis ions of Sect ion 716 of t h e Municipal A c t , sub jec t t o provis ion of adequate s e r v i c e s t o t h e s i te , t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n of t h e Engineering Department.

Such approval t o be v a l i d f o r s i x months from t h i s date .

6 . Appl ica t ion 5681-385 i s an a p p l i c a t i o n f o r rezoning from R-S t o R-F(R) t o permit t h e subdiv is ion of Lot 78, Northeast Quarter , Sec t ion 16, Township 2 , Plan 24397, NWD, being 7017 - 144th S t r e e t .

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e present p l an des igna t ions f o r t h e s i t e are as fol lows:

( a ) O f f i c i a l Regional Plan - Urban

(b) O f f i c i a l Community Plan - Urban

( c ) Newton Plan - Single Family

( d ) Control Plan 62 - Single Family

40.

Lr

U

The r e p o r t noted t h a t t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n w a s no t approved by Council on October 19, 1981, because of t h e s e r v i c i n g problems i d e n t i f i e d by t h e Engineering Department. The r epor t added t h a t t h e developer has ind ica t ed t h a t h e i s w i l l i n g t o provide a l l Municipal s e r v i c e s i n accordance wi th Subdivis ion By-law No. 5944.

The Direc tor of Planning w a s recommending t h a t t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n be approved t o proceed f o r rezoning from R-S t o R-F(R), pursuant t o t h e provis ions of Sec t ion 716 of t h e Municipal A c t , sub jec t to :

(a) Refinement of t h e layout a t subdiv is ion s t a g e ; and

(b) Provis ion of s e r v i c e s i n accordance wi th Subdivis ion By-law No. 5944.

Such approval to be v a l i d f o r s i x months from t h i s da te .

7. Applicat ion 5681-386 i s an a p p l i c a t i o n f o r rezoning R-S t o R-F(R) t o permit t h e subdiv is ion of Lot 10, East Hal f , Northeast Quarter , Sec t ion 16, Township 2 , Plan 2818, NWD, being 6979 - 144th S t r e e t .

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e present p l an des igna t ions f o r t h e s i t e are as fol lows:

(a) O f f i c i a l Regional Plan - Urban

(b ) O f f i c i a l Community Plan - Urban

( c ) Newton Plan - Single Family

( d ) Control Plan - Single Family

( e ) The s i t e i s wi th in t h e Urban Development Area.

The Direc tor of Planning w a s recommending t h a t t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n be approved t o proceed f o r rezoning from R-S t o R-F(R), pursuant t o t h e provis ions of Sect ion 716 of t h e Municipal A c t , sub jec t t o :

(a) Refinement of t h e layout a t t h e subd iv i s ion s t a g e ; and

(b) Resolut ion of t h e concerns regard ing se rv ic ing a t t h e subdiv is ion s tage .

Such approval to be v a l i d f o r s i x months from t h i s da te .

8. Applicat ion 5681-558 i s an a p p l i c a t i o n f o r rezoning from RS t o I-G t o p e r m i t t h e cons t ruc t ion of a manufacturing and warehousing development on Lot 10, Southeast Quarter , Sec t ion 30, Township 2 , Plan 12756, NWD - except Pa rce l "A" (Explanatory Plan 15347), being 12639 - 80th Avenue.

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e present p l an des igna t ions f o r t h e s i te are as fol lows:

41.

(a) O f f i c i a l Regional - I n d u s t r i a l

( b )

(c)

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t Council t ab l ed t h i s a p p l i a t i o n , pending a r epor t regarding t h e p o t e n t i a l development of t he 62 x 120-foot l o t surrounded by t h e proposed rezoning. The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e s i t e could be developed f o r an i n d u s t r i a l use with a bui ld ing of approximately 3,000 square f e e t .

O f f i c i a l Community Plan - Urban

Proposed Newton Plan - I n d u s t r i a l

The Direc tor of Planning w a s recommending t h a t t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n be approved t o proceed f o r rezoning from RS t o I -G , pursuant t o t h e p rov i s ions of Sect ion 716 of t h e Municipal A c t , sub jec t t o t h e d e c l a r a t i o n of t h e s i t e as a Development Permit Area t o ensure adequate landscaping and screening f o r t h e r e s i d e n t s on the small l o t .

Such approval t o be v a l i d f o r s i x months from t h i s da te .

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e e i g h t rezoning a p p l i c a t i o n s be

approved t o proceed as ind ica t ed by t h e Direc tor of Planning.

Before t h i s motions w a s put:-

It w a s

s epa ra t e ly . RES.NO.1-394

It w a s then

t o proceed. RES.NO.1-395

Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Fomich That Appl ica t ion 5681-594 be considered

Carr ied

Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That Appl ica t ion 5681-594 no t be approved

Carr ied wi th Alderman Bose aga ins t .

The o r i g i n a l motion w a s then put and:- RES.NO.1-396 Carr ied as amended.

I t e m 2413:

The Manager submitted a r epor t dea l ing wi th Development Pe rmi t 6781-606 wi th Woodland Deliteria Ltd.

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t cons ide ra t ion of t h i s Development P e r m i t w a s t ab l ed u n t i l a d d i t i o n a l information regarding t h e surrounding area w a s submitted. The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e parcel t o t h e immediate no r th

t h e Clover Alleys. conta ins a Mac's Convenience S to re and d i r e c t l y ac ross 58th Avenue i s m

To t h e east of t h e proper ty i n ques t ion i s t h e

42.

Lr

m

Prov inc ia l Court bu i ld ing and a two-storey apartment bui lding. These s t r u c t u r e s f r o n t on e i t h e r 58th Avenue o r 57A Avenue. D i rec t ly t o the south of t h e proposed bu i ld ing i s a two-storey commercial bu i ld ing and ac ross 176th S t r e e t t o the w e s t i s an empty l o t .

A motion by Alderman Bose t o t a b l e t h i s matter, pending t h e submission of a d d i t i o n a l information regarding t h e surrounding p r o p e r t i e s received no Seconder.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderrcan Watkins That t h e p l ans be r e f e r r e d back t o t h e

app l i can t t o r e v i s e t h e n o r t h e l e v a t i o n as i t w a s inadequately t r ea t ed .

RES.NO.1-397 This motion w a s Defeated wi th Aldermen Schrenk, Whit taker , Easton, Watkins and Fomich a g a i n s t .

It was then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That Development Permit 6781-606 be

approved t o proceed, t h e Mayor and Clerk be au thor ized t o s i g n the Permit, and t h a t Council au tho r i ze t h e t r a n s f e r of t h e permit t o t h e h e i r s , admin i s t r a to r s , executors , successors and a s s igns of t h e t i t l e of t h e land wi th in t h e terms of t h e Permit.


I t e m 2414:

The Manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Manager, Adminis t ra t ive Services - Planning, dea l ing wi th Development P e r m i t 6781-339 with Progressive Homes Ltd.

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e Development Permit had been prepared t o a l low t h e cons t ruc t ion of a 94 u n i t townhouse development. The Development Permit supplements t h e Zoning By-law by a t t a c h i n g bu i ld ing des ign , s i t i n g and landscape p lans .

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h i s Development P e r m i t be approved.

It w a s then Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That Council approve Development P e r m i t

6781-339, t h a t t h e Mayor and Clerk be au thor ized t o s i g n t h e Development Permit and t h a t Council au tho r i ze t h e t r a n s f e r of t he permit t o t h e h e i r s , admin i s t r a to r s , executors , successors and a s s igns of t h e t i t l e of t h e land wi th in t h e terms of t h e Permit.

Fomich aga ins t . RES.NO.1-399 Carr ied wi th Alderman Bose and Alderman

43.

I t e m 2415

The Manager submitted a r epor t from t h e Manager, Adminis t ra t ive Services - Planning dea l ing wi th Development Permit 6781-677 with Cressey Development Corporation.

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t a Development P e r m i t had been prepared t o allow t h e cons t ruc t ion of a 46 u n i t townhouse development a t 82 Avenue and 121 S t r e e t . The Development P e r m i t supplements the Zoning Ey-law by a t t a c h i n g bu i ld ing des ign , s i t i n g and landscape plans. The Development Permit a l s o v a r i e s t h e s i t i n g and design of t h e parking t o inc rease t h e q u a n t i t y of landscaped area and approved bu i ld ing s i t i n g . As a consequence of t h i s var iance , t h e t o t a l number of parking spaces w a s reduced from 92 t o 83.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h i s Development Permit be approved.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That Council approve Development Permit

6781-677, t h a t t h e Mayor and Clerk be au thor ized t o s i g n t h e Development P e r m i t and t h a t Council au tho r i ze t h e t r a n s f e r of the Permit t o t h e h e i r s , admin i s t r a to r s , executors , succcessors and a s s igns of t h e t i t l e of t h e land w i t h i n t h e terms of t h e Permit.


I t e m 2416

II

The Manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Manager, Adminis t ra t ive Services - Planning, dea l ing wi th Development Permit 6781-187 with Quadrant Developments Ltd.

The r e p o r t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h e Development Permit had been prepared t o a l low t h e cons t ruc t ion of 13 s i n g l e fami ly houses on Lot 121 t o 134, excluding Lot 129, NE 1/4, Sec.8, Tp.1, Plan 55956, NWD., l oca t ed on t h e south s i d e of Marine Drive between 131 and 132B S t r e e t .

Alderman Fomich l e f t t h e meeting.

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t t h i s voluntary Development P e r m i t in t roduces necessary v a r i a t i o n t o By-law 5942 t o t a k e advantage of t h e e x i s t i n g g rad ien t of t h e s i te and restricts t h e bu i ld ing he ight t o g ive each l o t a panoramic view t o t h e south. Relaxat ion of t h e s i t e coverages and se tbacks are a l s o included.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h i s Development Permit be approved.

It w a s then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That Council approve Development P e r m i t

6781-187, t h a t t h e Mayor and Clerk be au thor ized t o s i g n t h e Development Permit and t h a t Council au tho r i ze t h e t r a n s f e r of t he

of t h e t i t l e of t h e land w i t h i n t h e terms of t h e permit. permit t o t h e h e i r s , admin i s t r a to r s , executors , successors and a s s igns U

44.

U

Before t h i s motion w a s pu t , a motion by Alderman Bose t o t a b l e t h i s matter and t h a t a pub l i c information meeting be he ld wi th t h e ad jacent proper ty owners received no seconder.

RES.NO.1-401 The motion was then put and Carr ied.

I t e m 2417

The Manager submitted a r e p o r t from t h e Manager, Adminis t ra t ive Serv ices - Planning, dea l ing wi th Development Permit 6781-492.

The r epor t i nd ica t ed t h a t a Development Permit had been prepared t o a l low t h e cons t ruc t ion of a 72 u n i t t h r e e s t o r e y apartment bui lding. The Development Permit supplements t h e Zoning By-law by a t t a c h i n g bu i ld ing zoning, s i t i n g and landscape plans.

The Manager w a s recommending t h a t t h i s zoning be approved.

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That Council approve Development P e r m i t

6781-492, t h a t t h e Mayor and Clerk be au thor ized t o s i g n t h e Development Permit and t h a t Council au tho r i ze t h e t r a n s f e r of the Permit t o t h e h e i r s , admin i s t r a to r s , executors and a s s igns of t h e t i t l e of t h e land wi th in t h e t e r m s of t h e P e r m i t .

RES.NO.1-402 Carr ied.

V 2. The Manager ind ica t ed t h a t t h e fo l lowing r e s o l u t i o n t ab led under I t e m 2367 on December 2 , 1981, had been d e a l t with:

It w a s then Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Campbell That Council recons ider t h i s r e so lu t ion .

Carried.

The Resolut ion i n ques t ion approved Development Pe rmi t 6781-606.

8. CLERK'S REPORT

1 . It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e Minutes of t h e West Newton Local

Area Planning Committee meeting of December 3 , 1981, be received. RES.NO.1-403 Carried.

2. It w a s Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Bose That t h e Minutes of t h e Cloverdale Local

Area Planning Committee meeting of November 25, 1981 he received. RES.NO.1-404

Ir Carried.

45 .

3. It w a s Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Bose That t he r e p o r t of t h e P e r m i t s and

License Department f o r t h e month of October, 1981, be received. RES.NO.1-405 Carried

4. It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That t h e Minutes of t h e Publ ic Hearing

meeting of December 9, 1981, be received. RES. NO. 1-406 Carried.

Alderman Fomich re turned t o t h e meeting.

I. GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE

1.

2.

3.

4.

5 .

6.

7.

a.

9.

10.

Letter received from t h e Surrey Chamber of Commerce regarding tourism i n t h e Municipal i ty .

Letter received from t h e Direc tor of Drinking Driving Counterat tack, 207 - 815 Hornby S t r e e t , Vancouver, regard ing t h e i r program.

L e t t e r received from t h e Newton Old Age Pensioners Branch, #83 regarding t h e provis ion of a l e f t hand t u r n l a n e at 72 Avenue and the King George Highway.

Letter received from t h e North Surrey Minor Hockey Bantam B "1" t e a m - reques t ing permission t o se l l cookies o u t s i d e l i q u o r o u t l e t s during the Christmas Season.

Letter rece ived from t h e Minis te r of P rov inc ia l Secre ta ry and Government Serv ices enc los ing a cheque i n t h e amount of $197,083.34 f o r t he development of t h e Whalley Park s p o r t s f i e l d complex.

Letter rece ived from t h e Min i s t e r amount of $18,598.34 r ep resen t ing on P rov inc ia l Government proper ty

Letter received from t h e Su l l ivan Assoc ia t ion reques t ing a g ran t of H a l l .

of Finance enc los ing a cheque i n the t h e Province 's grant- in- l ieu of t axes f o r 1981.

Amateur A t h l e t i c and Community $850.00 t o assist wi th r e p a i r s t o t h e

Letter received from Bumpers, 13465 King George Highway, reques t ing permission t o remain open from 7:OO p.m. t o 1:00 a.m. on Thursday, December 31, 1981.

Letter received from Gremallen En te rp r i se s Ltd. , 12992 Glengarry Crescent , reques t ing t h a t Council approve a change i n t h e c los ing house of t h e Green Timbers Pub from 11:OO p.m. t o 1:00 a.m.

rJ P e t i t i o n received from M r . E. Kaye, 18620 - 64 Avenue, reques t ing t h a t t h e East Cloverdale area be included i n t h e Urban Development Area.

46.

11. Addit ional p e t i t i o n received regard ing t h e proposed i n d u s t r i a l zoning on 176 S t r e e t a t 64 Avenue.

Lr 12. Letter received from t h e F rase r Heights Ratepayers Associat ion regard ing appointments t o t h e F rase r Heights Local Area Planning C o d t t e e .

13. P e t i t i o n s received reques t ing t h a t t h e F rase r Heights Area be included i n t h e Urban Growth Area.

14. Letter received from B. Dube r eques t ing a refund f o r two Christmas tree l i c e n s e s i ssued t o t h e Canadian Parapleg ic Associat ion.

15. Letter received from M r s . E. Watson, reques t ing a refund of t h e business l i c e n s e f e e f o r a non-profit s t o r e f o r t h e kandicapped at 12911 - 16 Avenue. The l i c e n s e f e e i s $55.00.

16. Letter received from t h e /I2812 Royal Canadian Army Cadet Corps., 15977 P a c i f i c Avenue, White Rock r eques t ing a g ran t of $1,320.00 t o cover t h e r e n t a l of f a c i l i t i e s a t 5424 - 148 S t r e e t . (Panorama Community H a l l ) .

17. Letter received from M r . J.W. Gray of 14691 - 16 Avenue reques t ing t h a t funding be provided f o r cons t ruc t ion works on 16 Avenue between 128 S t r e e t and 148 S t r e e t .

18. L e t t e r received from t h e North Surrey Band and Chorus regarding t h e i r Christmas Program.

CI 19. Letter received from t h e Vancouver Academy of Music, 1270 Chestnut S t r e e t , Vancouver, reques t ing a g ran t f o r 1982.

20. Letter received from t h e P r i n c i p a l of t h e Pacific Vocational I n s t i t u t e regarding a Canadian Museum of F l i g h t and Transportat ion.

21. Letter received from Kwantlen College regard ing t h e i r graduat ion and Open House a t t h e Newton Campus on Wednesday, December 16 , 1981.

22. Christmas l e t t e r received from Ernest H a l l , MLA, Surrey/White Rock.

23. L e t t e r received from t h e West Newton Property Owners Assoc ia t ion enc los ing p e t i t i o n s concerning input i n t o a Community Plan and f u t u r e expansion of t h e Urban Development Area Boundaries.

24. Form le t ters received regard ing t h e Canadian Museum of F l i g h t and Transpor ta t ion :

cr

a ) M r . D. Sambrooke, #2 33682 Homeview S t r e e t , Abbotsford. b) Dean Muller c ) R. Neules d ) C h r i s t i n e Smart e ) U. Schmidt, 508 Windthrop Road, V ic to r i a f ) M. Anderson, 1795 - 156A Street , Surrey g ) H. Richmund, 3862 - 202A S t r e e t , Langley. h ) S . Borth, Blue Mountain F lyers .

47.

M r . Knowles, 2425 Alpine Crescent , V i c t o r i a J .W. T i f f i n , 319 - 1550 Barclay S t r e e t , Vancouver. R.J. More l l i K.D. Urquhart. R. Krywiak. B. Holt B. Johnson R. Brandly R.A. Stunden Rose Blazenho, 6611 Fdnoru Blvd. Richmond, B.C. J.F. Moore, 2971 E. 3rd Avenue, Vancouver. Doug Banks, Box 262, Tofino, B.C. G. Radalick John King W.A. MacDonald

2 5 . Letter received from M r s . J.L. Walker, 11393 - 96A Avenue, regarding t h e Canadian Museum of F l i g h t and Transpor ta t ion .

26. Letter rece ived from M r . Wm. Benjamin, 13984 - 115 Avenue regarding t r a f f i c on t h e h i l l s i d e no r th of Grosvenor Road.

It w a s then

received. RES.NO.1-407

I n regard t o I t e m No. 1 - It w a s

RES.NO.1-408

Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e above correspondence be

Carried.

Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e Mayor respond t o t h i s l e t te r . Carr ied.

I n regard t o I t e m No. 2 - It w a s Moved by Alderman Easton

Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That t h e Manager r epor t on the

i n s t a l l a t i o n of s ign ing throughout t h e Municipal i ty . RES.NO.1-409 Carr ied

I n regard t o I t e m No. 3 -

It w a s Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h i s let ter be r e f e r r e d t o the

Y

T r a f f i c Committee. RES.NO.1-410 Carried.

48

In regard to Item No. 4 -

Lr

It was Moved by Alderman Whittaker Seconded by Alderman Watkins That the North Surrey Minor Hockey Bantam

B "1" Team be granted permission to sell cookies outside liquor outlets in the Municipality during the Christmas Season.

RES.NO.1-411 Carried.

In regard to Item No. 7 - It was Moved by Alderman Bose

Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That Council authorize a grant of

$8,500.00 from the 1981 Budget to assist with repairs to the Sullivan Community Hall.



It was Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That Council permit Bumpers tu remain

open from 7:OO p.m. to 1:00 a.m. on Thursday, December 31, 1981. RES.NO.1-413 Carried.


It was Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Easton That this matter be tabled and that

information regarding opposition from the local residents regarding the pub be brought forward.



It was Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That this petition be referred to the

Annual Urban Development Area Review. RES.NO.1-415 Carried.


It was Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Bose That this letter be referred to the

Council-in-Committee Meeting to be held in 1982 to deal with Local Area Planning Committees.


49.

I n regard t o

It w a s

Annual Urban RES.NO.1-417

I n regard t o

It w a s

I t e m No. 13 -

Development Area

I t e m No. 14 -

Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t hese p e t i t i o n s be r e f e r r e d t o t he Review. Carr ied.

Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h e Council au tho r i ze a g ran t of

$19.00 as a refund f o r t h e two Christmas tree l i c e n c e s i ssued t o t h e Canadian Parapleg ic Associat ion.

RES.NO.1-418 Carr ied.

I n regard t o I t e m No. 15 -

It w a s Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That t h i s matter be r e f e r r e d t o the

P e r m i t s and Licences Department f o r a r epor t . RES.NO.1-419 Carr ied.

In regard t o Item No. 16 - It w a s Moved by Alderman Fou5ch

Seconded by Alderman Bose That a g ran t not be provided t o /I2812

Royal Canadian Army Cadet Corps. RES .NO. 1-420

I n regard t o I t e m No. 17 - It was

Budget d i scuss ion . RES.NO.1-421

I n regard t o I t e m No. 19 - It w a s

Academy of Music. RES. NO. 1-422

I n regard t o I t e m No. 20 - It was

Carried.

Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Fomich That t h i s l e t t e r be r e f e r r e d t o t h e

Carr ied.

Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Easton That no g ran t be made t o t h e Vancouver

Carried.

Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by Alderman Watkins That t h e P r i n c i p a l of t h e Pacific

rl

m

50.

Vocational Institute be advised of Council's resolution regarding the Canadian Museum of Flight and Transportation.

RES.NO.1-423 Carried . Y


It was Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Whittaker That this letter be referred to the

Annual Urban Development Area review. RES.NO.1-424 Carried.


It was Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Bose That this letter be referred to the

Traffic Committee. RES.NO.1-425 Carried.

J. ANY OTHER COMPETENT BUSINESS

1. Alderman Bose indicated that the Fraser River Estuary Study Committee will be meeting in Municipal Hall on December 22 at 3:30 p.m. to discuss this matter with any available Council members.

U

2. Alderman Schrenk indicated that she had received a letter from the resident at 6718 - 130 Street regarding the purchase of 31 hcrnes in the area by the Greater Vancouver Regional District.

The Mayor indicated that the Greater Vancouver Cistrict purchases a number of dwelling units throughout the Lower Mainland.

It was then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded hy Alderman Bose That the Mayor be requested to contact

the G.V.R.D. and ask that they hold a public inforIiiation meeting in this area to explain the purchase of the 31 units.


3. Alderman Schrenk indicated that she had now received the reports from the Multi-Culturalism Conference that she attended with Alderman Jacobs in Toronto. Alderman Schrenk indicated that a copy of the report should be forwarded to the School Board and copies of the other reports should be made available to the Council members.

It was then Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Bose That a letter of appreciation be sent to

Mrs. King and Mrs. Chandler. RES.NO.1-427 Carried

51.

L. ADJOURNMENT

It was then Moved by Alderman Fomich Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That the Regular Council Meeting do now

adjourn u n t i l Wednesday, December 16 , 1981 at 7:30 p.m. RES.NO.1-428 Carried.

The Regular Council Meeting adjourned at 11:OO p.m.

MAYOR

4

52.

Documents

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SURREYTHE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SURREY Y Municipal Hall 14245 - 56th Avenue Surrey, B.C. Monday, December 14, 1981 Time: 7:lO p.m. Minutes