The Corporation IPD (Edit)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 The Corporation IPD (Edit)

    1/2

    The Corporation

    GROUP VI 3EMC2GOMEZ, HANNAH G. 1//2!1"#ANTO#, RO$ERTHA CHRI#TINE %.

    VI&&ANUEVA, 'O#EMARIA PHI&IP #.

    16. Ray Anderson, CEO of Interface (the worlds largest commercial carpet

    manufacturer, descri!es a paradigm shift that he e"perienced when reading

    #aul $aw%ens &he Ecology of Commerce and learning a!out impact of

    corporations on species e"tinction. &his moti'ated him to see% ecological

    sustaina!ility within his corporation. $e states that the day must come when

    en'ironmental plundering is not allowed and people li%e him will end up in

    ail. $ow far o) is that day*

    The Corporation, the (o)*+entar that e-pore a0o*t the nat*re an( rie o(o+inant intit*tion. hie the (o)*+entar o)*e on the eo*tion o )orporationi4e Intera)e In), the )arpet )o+pan (e(i)ate( to it iion 5hoe CEO, Ra

    An(eron, 5a to*)he( ater rea(in6 Pa* Ha54en7 The E)oo6 o Co++er)e. %or21 ear, I neer 6ae a tho*6ht to 5hat 5e 5ere ta4in6 ro+ the Earth or (oin6 to theEarth in the +a4in6 o o*r pro(*)t.A 8*etion o))*r in the +in( et o An(eron, ho5ar he )an *taine( the 0*ine 5itho*t ta4in6 o+ethin6 ro+ the earth that )a*e(etr*)tion on it.

    A on6 a 5e *pport GO GREEN pro9e)t to prote)t the eniron+ent an( it

    *taina0iit an( e(*)ate peope to 0e reponi0e on 5hat 5e )an (o to )han6e the5a 5e (ipoe o o*r trah an( re))a0e, 5e et no 6*it o p*n(erin6 )reat*re onearth. e +*t 0e rea( an( +otiate( to hep *tain o*r panet.

    The 0otto+ ine i not the on eentia thin6 in a 0*ine 0*t it ho5 5e (o 0*ineto *tain ie in the 5or( 5e ie. Happ ie, happ panet.

    1+. &he narrator states the following &he pursuit of pro-t is an old story, !ut

    there was a time when many things were regarded as either too sacred or

    too essential for the pu!lic good to !e conspired !usiness opportunities. &heywere protected !y tradition and pu!lic regulation.&oday, common goods

    such as land and water ha'e !een turned into pri'ate property. $ow might

    capitalists defend such pri'atiing of the commons*

    http://www.paulhawken.com/comments_ecology_of_commerce.htmlhttp://www.paulhawken.com/comments_ecology_of_commerce.html
  • 7/25/2019 The Corporation IPD (Edit)

    2/2

    According to Jeremy Rifkin, Beginning with Tudor England, we began to see a phenomenon

    emerge, and that is the enclosure of the great commons, by parliamentary acts in England, and

    then in Europe. And so, first we began to take the great land masses of the world, which were

    commons and shared, and we reduced those to private property. Then we went after the oceans

    the great oceanic commons, and we created laws and regulations that would allow countries

    to claim a certain amount of water outside their coastal limits for exploitation. In this century, we

    went after the air, and we divided it into air corridors that could be bought and sold for

    commercial traffic for airplanes.

    In the U.K., privatization has accomplished wonders. By 1979, the borrowings and losses of

    state-owned industries were running at about 3 billion a year. But from 1989 to 1990,

    companies privatized by the Thatcher government fattened the government purse by some 2

    billion. privatization has shown itself capable not only of rescuing individual industries and a

    whole economy headed for disaster but also of transforming public attitudes toward economic

    responsibility and the concept of private property.

    1/. A person stated that 02342 of childrens products would not ha'e

    !een purchased without children nagging their parents. 5hat is the moral

    pro!lem with child ad'ertising*

    The +ora pro0e+ 5ith )hi( a(ertiin6 i that a(ertie+ent are 0ein6 hone( 0

    p)hoo6it an( enhan)e( 0 +e(ia te)hnoo6it. #in)e the )hi(: +in( i not et

    (eeope(, +ar4eter are *in6 it to the )hi( (eeop+enta *nera0iit an( 0e)a*e

    the 4no5 ho5 the )hi(ren thin4, an( the *e it to their a(anta6e o a to hep thoe

    0*inee/ )orporation to earn +ore proit. Ao, in)e the a(ertie+ent are

    0a)4e( *p 0 p)hoo6it the 4no5 ho5 to +anip*ate thee )hi(ren into 5antin6 to

    0* the pro(*)t, the )reate the nee( or the )hi(ren to 0e or)e( to 0*. $ae( ao on

    5hat i ai( in the (o)*+entar, the parent hate it 5hen 4i( na6, 5hi)h i 5h +ot o

    the ti+e 5hen )hi(ren na6, the parent are or)e( to )o+p 5ith 5hat the )hi( 5ant

    9*t o the )hi( top na66in6, 5hi)h i 5hat the ph)hoo6it inten(e( to happen.Ai(e ro+ that 0ae( on a t*( 0 ;r. Aan etee+ an( other i*e that )o+e ro+ not hain6 5hat the

    5ant.thi ae)t the)hi(ren 5e 0ein6 6rae.