Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
1
TEN - TProject finance & PPPs
Experiences from a Finnish PPP projectusing
project life-cycle management from the order perspective tomaximise efficiency
Matti VehviläinenFinnish Traffic Agency
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
2
Transport System’sDepartment
Anne Herneoja
Maritime DepartmentRaimo Tapio
• Sea TrafficManagement
• Waterways• Hydrographic Office
Rail DepartmentOssi Niemimuukko
Road DepartmentJukka Hirvelä
Director General Juhani Tervala
CommunicationsAnna Jokela
Internal Audit
Marja-Liisa Peltomaa
AdministrationDepartment
Hannu Mäkikangas
• Transport• Development• Public Transport
• Rail TrafficManagement
• RailwayInvestments
• Rail Network
• Road Operations
• Road Investments
• Road and BridgeEngineering
• Road TrafficCentres
• Economy
• Personnel
• IT/ICT
• Administration
• Information andArchives
Director General’s StaffTimo Hiltunen
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
3
Use of the life-cycle model in Finland
Decision-in-principle of the Finnish Government’s Ministerial Committeefor Economic Policy 12/2003:The life-cycle (PPP) model can be used for traffic infrastructure projectsThe Ministerial Committee’s decision in February 2004 on use of thelife-cycle model for the E18 Muurla - Lohja motorway project
Good experiences with the life-cycle model in Finland and internationally.The EU promotes use of the life-cycle model for traffic infrastructure construction.Quick completion of the project is particularly important, and the life-cycle model makesfaster completion possible.Preliminary calculations indicate that the life-cycle model is the most economic overallsolution.The life-cycle model provides the opportunity to implement other traffic infrastructureprojects in the near future.
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
4
Design-BuildIntegratedDesign &Construction(Public Funding)
TraditionalDesign-Bid-Build
Life-cycle Contract logical step
Life-cycle Consideration Life-cycle Responsibility
Design-BuildPlus Long-TermMaintenance &Upkeep
Plus Financing
???
B
DBDBMO
DBFO
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
5
Finnish application of the PPP model: life-cycle modelThe client orders the long-term service entity by means of a service contract -Contract period autumn 2005 - autumn 2029The service provider must establish a special purpose company (SPC) to takeresponsibility for construction design, construction, maintenance and financing.The service requirements are described as
performance specifications (top surface of the road, environmental factors,fittings and equipment etc.)technical product requirements (long-term structures)
The payment mechanism combines the quality and quantity of servicesproduced with the service fee
availability of service defines the basic amountmonitored criteria create variability
Procurement model of E18
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
6
The client´ s cashflow in traditional (DB) andlife-cycle model
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Years
ST -MALLI
ELINKAARIMALLIPHASE 2 OPENED
PHASE 1 OPENED
D
DB MODEL
LIFE-CYCLE MODEL
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
7
PerformanceMaintenance
Surface Condition
Fixed dates
Failures
GROSS SERVICE PAYMENTGROSS SERVICE PAYMENT
AvailabilityUnavailability
Extent and duration
Location
Time Period
DEDUCTIONSDEDUCTIONS
AVAILABILITY PAYMENTAVAILABILITY PAYMENT PERFORMANCE PAYMENTPERFORMANCE PAYMENT
NET SERVICE PAYMENTNET SERVICE PAYMENT
Measurement of the ServiceMeasurement of the ServiceMeasurement of the Service
Maintenance Compensation- Traffic volume higher
than expected
Maintenance Compensation- Traffic volume higher
than expected
Safety Performance-Accidents compared
to reference roads-Safety bonus
Safety Performance-Accidents compared
to reference roads-Safety bonus
(Price of the service when quality at agreed level)
(Price of the service according to quality)
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
8
E18 Muurla-Lohjathe 2nd PPP project of FINNRA
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
9
E18 Muurla - Lohja
Part of the Nordic Triangle, prioritised by the EUCurrently a two-lane highway that is geometrically poor: weak traffic safety andsmoothness of trafficConversion to a motorway on the basis of legally valid road plans (12/2003)The order authorisation 700 million euros (budget of the State in 2004, nominalvalue)
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
10
Lahnajärvi gradeseparated intersection
Suomusjärvi gradeseparated intersection
Muurla gradeSeparatedintersectionKruusila gradeseparated intersection
E18 Muurla - Lohja motorway
Sammatti gradeseparated intersection
Nummi gradeseparated intersection Karnainen grade
separated intersection
Lempola gradeseparated intersection
Muurla-Lahnajärvi sectionopen to traffic in
2008
Lahnajärvi-Lohja sectionopen to traffic in
2008
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
11
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
12
Tunnels
Hepomäki 270 mLakiamäki 430 mTervakorpi 560 mPitkämäki 595 mOrosmäki 600 mKarnainen 2200 mLehmihaka 300 m
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
13
Complemented road plan
Extensive, documented soil and bedrock surveysBasic road plan solution with updated startinginformationDegrees of freedom in the plan – for example,motorway altitude 0 - ± 2 mAbsolute boundary conditions - environmental impactGraphic thematic mapsStarting points for risk management(plan solutions)
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
14
Schedule for the bidding process
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13.2.2004: decision on applying life-cycle model
6.3.2004 procurement announcement
30.7.2004 12.00 deadline for pre-qualification registration
preparation of the bidding documentation
calculation period
opening the bids
negotiations
service contract
contract period until 2029
2004 2005 2006
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
15
Shortlisted bidders
- Bouygues Travaux Pub-lics
- Kesälahden MaansiirtoOy
(- NCC Roadsaliurakoitsijana)
Franceand
Finland
- Cintra Concesiones deInfrastructuras deTransporte, S.A
- SRV Teräsbetoni Oy(- Ferrovial Agroman
aliurakoitsijana)
Spainand
Finland
- Tieliikelaitos- YIT Rakennus Oy
Finland
Tieyhtiö Ykköstie Oy:- Skanska BOT AB- Laing Roads Ltd- Lemminkäinen Oyj
Sweden,UK andFinland
- Vinci Concessions France
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
16
Structure of contract (investment period)
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
17
Status of the projectMotorway opened for traffic in two phases : 19th Nov 2008 and28th Jan 2009,due date for both phases 15th Nov 2008short delays because of difficulties related to traffic managementand tunnel safety systemsinvestment period closed Jan 2010, yet some problems remainingin the functionality of the traffic management systemthe interface between the client´s traffic center and the RoadCompany challengingconclusion: more accurate technical requirements for definition oftraffic management and tunnel safety systems instead ofperformance specifications
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
18
Objectives set for the PPP modelE18 Muurla-Lohja, Invitation to tender October 2004
Quickly opening the motorway for trafficGood traffic safety --> motorway standard, paymentmechanismReducing congestion similar to traffic safetyTop-class road maintenance services for road users--> technical requirements for the maintenance period, andavailability/service level as payment mechanism basesOptimal allocation of risks (administrative/technical risks)Economically most advantageous approach5/28/2010 18
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
19
Overall economy of the E18 Muurla – Lohja contractMain benefits of the life-cycle model in comparison to budget-financedimplementation
quick and cost-effective constructiondegrees of freedom made possible by responsibility period of more than 20years
Reasons for quick implementationinitiation of service fees only after the road is taken into use encourages thedesigners, builders and sponsors to focus on quick implementation in acompetitive situationthe private sector has more flexible and free procurement procedures comparedto the public sectorthe private sector also has better capacity to optimise financing duringconstructionefficient project management and capacity to react quickly to the need forchanges direct the entire value chain of the project towards optimalimplementation
Net present value savings in investment, maintenance and financingcosts of about 3.5 %In addition, savings in driving costs of about EUR 34 M
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
20
E18 Muurla-Lohja (”Public Sector Comparator 2”)
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
21
Starting points for procurement preparation of new PPPsUtilising documentation and experience obtained from the E18Muurla-Lohja projectFocus areas in development of agreement documents
More specific preliminary funding solution planningPossibly compressing the service agreement, potential changescaused by the funding solution, assessing allocation of risksSimplifying the payment mechanismDeveloping technical requirements based on a post-analysis,possible changes pertaining to the allocation of risksClarifying the traffic management system and the related technicalrequirements, interface to the Traffic Centre, period of liabilityRoad company's role in controlling and managing technical qualityCo-operation between client and service provider
5/28/2010 21
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
22
Objective for the E18: Achieving motorway level by 2015 incompliance with approved EU-level plans
22
= PPP project (actual construction time)= direct budget funding (actual building time)= PPP project (completion time)
Project Road Cost est. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
H1 Mw 1 Muurla-Lohja, completion 2009 299
H2 Ring III Vanhakartano-Lentoas.tie 255
H4 Mw 7 Hamina Bypass 175
H3 Mw 7 Koskenkylä-Loviisa-Kotka 285
H5 Mw 7 Hamina-Vaalimaa 196
5/28/2010 22
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
23
TEN- T support of E18 Muurla -Lohja
E18 Road (part of Nordic Triangle priority project, PP12)E18 has been supported via 16 different TEN-decision since 1995 (studies, Interestrebates, direct grants) for various sectionsFinland worked several years to achieve possibility to apply PPP support
Finnish approach for PPP (Life-cycle based availability payment fee) was not typicalPPP application and the EU legislation did not allow to proceed until the TENregulation was updated in 2007.
PPP was applied first time for E18 Muurla – Lohja section at 2007 (Multi-AnnualProgramme)
Not successful / Justification: Not a key bottleneck on PP12.Application was send again in 2008 for Annual Programme
Strong emphasis on PPP pilot actionSuccessful / Justification: The project will be implemented as a long term life cyclebased PPPmodel in an availability payment scheme. As this project is the first in ofthis kind in Finland the preparation phase was taken very seriously andcomprehensive. The project is coherent with the envisaged purpose and has goodtechnical descriptions of the works to be performed.
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
24
Decision
“Community financial 7.790.000 euro is hereby granted to the Beneficiary, in theframework of an availability payment scheme”The Commission shall contribute a maximum amount as indicated in Article 2of this Decision, equivalent to 10 % of the estimated total eligible costs forworks indicated in paragraph 2.The request will cover only the availability payments' part corresponding tothe works carried out and shall be accompanied by a certification by theMember State that the expenses claimed have actually been incurred. TheBeneficiary shall also provide evidence that the corresponding part of theinfrastructure has been delivered, and a copy of the public-private partnershipcontract.The end date shall be the date when the accumulative amount of theavailability payment part corresponding to the works reaches the amountof the Community financial aid. It shall not be later than 31 December 2009.
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
25Reporting1. Cover sheet2. Final Report and Financial Statement,2.1 Final Report and Financial Statement, part 12.1 .1 Invoices and payment copies2.2 Final Report and Financial Statement, part 23. Certificates and statements3.1 Proof of the project total cost3.2 E18 Muurla–Lohja LCC Service Agreement Certificate of Completion3.3 Confirmation of the cost breakdown4 Contract documents4.1 E18 Muurla - Lohja LCC Service Agreement Tender Invitation
Document 1 Service Agreement4.2 E18 Muurla–Lohja LCC Service Agreement Tender Invitation
Document 2, Project Description, Updated 28 February4.3 E18 Muurla - Lohja Service Agreement Tender Invitation Document 3 Payment
Mechanism4.4 Records of the inspection of the Agreement Area on 18 August 2005 and the
Agreement Documents on 22 August 20054.5 Main schedules of Construction and Maintenance (a preliminary general
schedule as of 30 March 2005 and a schedule for the operation andmaintenance work as of 22 August 2005 / 3 October 2005)
4.6 E18 Muurla–Lohja LCC Service Agreement, Design and ConstructionDocumentation, Updated on 28 February
4.7 E18 Muurla–Lohja LCC Service Agreement Tender InvitationDocument 8, Technical Requirements, Updated on 28 February 2005
4.8 E18 Muurla – Lohja (Right of Way plan as supplemented)4.9 E18 Muurla – Lohja (annex 10, List of Instructions (and other
documents specified in such list))4.10 E18 Muurla–Lohja LCC Service Agreement Tender Invitation Document 4,
Complementary terms and conditions of the Service Agreement5. E18/Highway 1 Muurla - Lohja (–Lohja (Lieviö), Summary of
monitoring of flying squirrels 2001-20095.1 Maps
• Required documentation:• Financial and technical
statements (commissionforms)
• Invoices of payments
• PPP concession contract
• Environmental monitoringreport
• Summary of annexes =>
• Bi-lateral discussion withAgency:
• Site-visit and preliminaryevaluation on existingdocumentation
• Agency comments on thedocumentation
• Collection and submission offinal report material
13.10.2009 /M.Vehviläinen
26
Thank you for your attention !