Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1786
SUPREME COURT MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2015
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
S121365 SNOW (PRENTICE JUAN) ON
H.C.
Order to show cause issued
The Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is ordered to show cause in
this court, when the matter is placed on calendar, why petitioner is not entitled to relief because he
was denied his state and federal constitutional rights to the assistance of counsel at the penalty
phase of his trial, as alleged in Claims 15 and 16 of the amended petition for writ of habeas
corpus, filed December 18, 2006. The return must be filed on or before November 30, 2015.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
S229276 A141143 First Appellate District, Div. 2 IN RE I.C.
Petition for review granted
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
S229446 B251230 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. FINANCIAL
CASUALTY & SURETY, INC.
Petition for review granted; issues limited
The petition for review is granted.
The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following:
(1) Should the good cause standard under Penal Code section 1305.4 for extension of the
period to exonerate bail require a demonstration of a reasonable likelihood of success of
returning a fugitive?
(2) When a court finds there has been a diligent investigation to locate a fugitive, does the
burden shift under Penal Code section 1305.4 to the People to prove that there is not a
reasonable likelihood of success of returning the fugitive?
(3) Does an extension of the period to exonerate bail under Penal Code section 1305.4
commence on the date on which the initial 180-day period expires or on the date on which
the trial court grants the extension?
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, and Cuéllar, JJ.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1787
S143743 PEOPLE v. MENDOZA
(HUBER JOEL)
Supplemental briefing ordered
The application dated October 21, 2015, of appellant Huber Joel Mendoza to file a supplemental
letter brief in the above-captioned case is granted. The Attorney General is directed to serve and
file a responsive letter brief in hard copy in our Clerk’s Office no later than Wednesday,
November 18, 2015. Appellant may serve and file a responsive reply brief within 10 court days
after the Attorney General’s responsive brief is filed under this or any subsequent order of this
court. The provisions of California Rules of Court, rule 8.25(b)(3) will not apply.
The court vacates the submission of the matter that occurred on October 6, 2015, to afford time
for the briefing and consideration of the issue raised in appellant’s supplemental letter brief. This
matter will be resubmitted, without further order, as of the date that the last supplemental brief is
or could be timely filed under this or any subsequent order of this court. (See Cal. Rules of Court,
rule 8.524(h).
S229010 H041363 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. DELAPENA
(JAMES EDWARD)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of a related issue in People v. DeHoyos, S228230 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
S229113 D067447 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 FLANNIGAN (KAROLYN) v.
ONULDO, INC.
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted.
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in
Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp., S218973 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules
of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1788
S229271 C075960/C076314 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. ACCREDITED
SURETY & CASUALTY CO.
INC.
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted.
Further action is this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in
People v. Financial Casualty & Surety (S229446) (see Cal. rules of Court, rule 8.524 (c)), or
pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules
of Court, rule 8.528, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
S229373 F067821 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. BEHILL (JESSE
JESUS)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of a related issue in People v. Chaney, S223676, and People v. Valencia, S223825
(see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of
additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further
order of the court.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
S229442 C078557 Third Appellate District UNIVERSAL PROTECTION
SERVICE, LP v. S.C.
(PARNOW)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted.
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in
Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc., S220812 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules
of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1789
S229366 B265256 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 CORETTO (PAUL
ANTHONY) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for review granted; transferred to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division
Eight, with directions to issue an order to show cause
The petition for review is granted. The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second
Appellate District, Division Eight, with directions to vacate its order denying mandate and issue
an order directing respondent, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, to show
cause why the relief sought in the petition should not be granted.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
S225982 D066332 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. HUNTSBERRY
(CRAIG)
Appeal abated
As indicated in a certified copy of the certificate of death, appellant Craig Huntsberry died on
June 21, 2015. Accordingly, the proceeding in People v. Craig Huntsberry, S225982, is
permanently abated. The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District,
Division One with directions to enter an order in case no. D066332 permanently abating all
proceedings with respect to defendant and to require the Superior Court for San Diego County to
enter an order to that effect in case no. SCE332867. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d); People v.
Dail (1943) 22 Cal.2d 642, 659; People v. Bandy (1963) 216 Cal.App.2d 458, 466.) The request
to retain the cause for decision, made in a letter filed by appellant’s counsel on August 6, 2015, is
denied.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.
S226944 KINDRED (RICHARD
SCOTT) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition denied
S228301 C076935 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. HALL (DAVID
SCOTT)
Petition for review denied
S228588 C076201 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. CARGILL (KEVIN
RUSSELL)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1790
S228638 C076206 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. JACKSON
(ANTOINE)
The petition for review is denied without prejudice to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. (See People v. Cropper (1979) 89
Cal.App.3d 716.)
S228654 B241172 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. LAZARUS
(STEPHANIE ILENE)
Petition for review & depublication request(s) denied
S228657 H040811 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. HILLDALE
(ANGELICA)
Petition for review denied
S228660 E060611 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. SMITH
(CHARLES LEE)
Petition for review denied
S228662 G051986 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 SA RECYCLING, LLC v.
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION APPEALS
BOARD & MELENDEZ
(EDGAR)
Petition for review denied
S228685 A144561 First Appellate District, Div. 5 McFARLAND (LORETTA) v.
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION APPEALS
BOARD AND PERMANENTE
MEDICAL GROUP INC.
Petition for review denied
Werdegar, J., was recused and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1791
S228701 A144238 First Appellate District, Div. 2 FLORES (NORMA) v.
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION APPEALS
BOARD & DEPARTMENT OF
SOCIAL SERVICES
Petition for review denied
S228739 A139463 First Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. JAMES (DENNIS
LAMAR)
Petition for review denied
S228780 B252995 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 SOTO (PATRICIA) v.
BORGWARNER MORSE
TEC, INC.
Petition for review denied
S228782 D067411 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. MORALES (JOEL
RODRIGUEZ)
Petition for review denied; CA opinion decertified
The petition for review is denied.
The Reporter of Decisions is directed not to publish in the Official Appellate Reports the opinion
in the above entitled appeal filed July 14, 2015, which appears at 238 Cal.App.4th 814. (Cal.
Const., art. VI, section 14; rule 8.1125(c)(1), Cal. Rules of Court.)
S228785 H039448 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. BARRETO
(RODOLFO)
Petition for review denied
S228811 A141942 First Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
(JAMES SALVADOR
ALVAREZ)
Petition for review denied
S228816 D065135 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. RAMIREZ
(RIGOBERTO GUTIERREZ)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1792
S228823 A142338 First Appellate District, Div. 1 HESS (ROBERT) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
The request for judicial notice of the records in related direct appeal case No. A140442 is granted.
S228827 A140442 First Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. HESS (ROBERT
A.)
Petition for review denied
S228831 G048170 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. KINDRED
(RICHARD SCOTT)
Petition for review denied
S228868 E060821 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. McCRAY
(LARRY)
Petition for review denied
S228903 F067579 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. FELIX (PHILIP
RON)
Petition for review denied
S228921 G050203 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. SUESS (JOSEPH
ROBERT)
Petition for review denied
S228923 B264320 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 DAVIS (BRUCE) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
S228930 F066730/F066753 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. GUERRERO
(VICTOR)
Petitions for review denied
S228939 C077870 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. GALZINSKI
(HARALD)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1793
S229004 E060754 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. FARIAS
(EDWARD)
Petition for review denied
S229035 H040401 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. HEINRICHS
(NATHAN DAVID)
Petition for review denied
S229060 B258767 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 OLSON (CHRISTOPHER
DALE & HEATHER RAE),
MARRIAGE OF
Petition for review denied
S229062 G050158 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 ROYAL PACIFIC FUNDING
CORPORATION v. ARNESON
(LINDA)
Petition for review denied
S229087 D064994 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. AYON (ENRIQUE)
Petition for review denied
S229097 B253040 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,
N.A. v. MATHIS (KIM
TREISE)
Petition for review denied
S229137 B254605 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 PEOPLE v. AGUIRRE
(RICARDO M.)
Petition for review denied
S229139 H042654 Sixth Appellate District ROUNDTREE (RICHARD
ALLEN) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1794
S229150 A145732 First Appellate District, Div. 1 VOELKER (KEITH) v.
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION APPEALS
BOARD & GSE
CONSTRUCTION
Petition for review denied
S229155 C077614 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. JOHNSON, JR.,
(VANDELL)
Petition for review denied
S229156 A138840 First Appellate District, Div. 2 CLAASSEN (UTZ) v. KUHN
(HANNES)
Petition for review denied
S229171 B250111 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 CARSON HARBOR
VILLAGE, LTD. v. CITY OF
CARSON
Petition for review & depublication request(s) denied
S229206 F066339 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. OCEGUERA
(JAIME)
Petition for review denied
S229217 F068291 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. WARREN
(JOHNATHAN HOWARD)
Petition for review denied
S229239 A142514 First Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. JOHNSON
(MICHAEL)
Petition for review denied
S229244 C079727 Third Appellate District NARAYAN (PRAKASH) v.
S.C. (RUCKER)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1795
S229268 B250193 Second Appellate District, Div. 2 SARIGIANIDES
(ALEXANDRA) v. TACOS
MEXICO, INC.
Petition for review denied
S229272 A144224 First Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. JONES (MARK
ANTHONY)
Petition for review denied
Corrigan, J., was recused and did not participate.
S229290 B255067 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 BEATTIE (ALBERT) v. CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE
Petition for review denied
S229291 E062519 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 VILLAGRAN (MARCO
ANTONIO) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
S229295 D068730 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 DONOROVICH-ODONNELL
(CHRISTY LYNNE) v. S.C.
(HARRIS)
Petition for review denied
S229298 D068758 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 DONOROVICH-
ODONNELL (CHRISTY
LYNNE) v. HARRIS
(KAMALA D.)
Application to transfer denied
The request for judicial notice filed October 8, 2015, is granted.
The petition for transfer is denied.
S229334 B252563 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 J.R. PIPELINE COMPANY,
INC. v. CITY OF LOS
ANGELES (MLADEN
BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION
CO., INC.)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1796
S229341 B253708 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 PEOPLE v. HINTON (DANIEL
DESHAWN)
Petitions for review denied
S229361 A139907 First Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. BANKS
(MAURICE)
Petition for review denied
S229376 B259313 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. BROWN
(ANTHONY CRAIG)
Petition for review denied
S229381 D068779 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 JOHN DOE v. S.C. (RIVERA)
Petition for review denied
S229389 D066774 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 STEIGER (LEE) v. STEIGER
(PAUL)
Petition for review denied
S229398 F068105 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. SANDERS
(PHILLIP EUGENE)
Petition for review denied
S229402 STEWART (TRACY LEE) v.
SUPREME COURT OF
CALIFORNIA (PEOPLE)
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition denied
S229403 E059952 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 TOPRAKJIAN (LUCY) v.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Petition for review denied
S229416 D065629 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 RAICEVIC (VLADIMIR) v.
GERACI (ALAN L.)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1797
S229417 D065705 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. FRANKLIN
(ARON LAMONT)
Petition for review denied
S229418 TURNER (ANTHONY R.) v.
S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition denied
S229419 B256285 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. ARCE (DANIEL)
Petition for review denied
S229421 C078455 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. MASON (BRYCE
CAMERON)
Petition for review denied
S229433 H042556 Sixth Appellate District PASTORE (VINCENT) v. S.C.
(COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ)
Petition for review denied
S229436 F068621 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. SWAIN, JR.,
(RAYMOND)
Petition for review denied
S229437 B255902 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 PEOPLE v. FIELDS (KELVIN
DWAYNE)
Petition for review denied
S229441 B250163 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 COOPER (NANCY) v.
TAKEDA
PHARMACEUTICALS
AMERICA INC.
Petition for review & depublication request(s) denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1798
S229445 F071919 Fifth Appellate District ATLAS CRANE & RIGGING,
INC. v. WORKERS’
COMPENSATION APPEALS
BOARD & GALLAHER
(DAVID)
Petition for review denied
S229450 F068072 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. RODRIGUEZ
(ANTHONY MATTHEW)
Petition for review denied
S229455 H042563 Sixth Appellate District ARIAS (MARIO MARTINEZ)
v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for review denied
S229457 B258743 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. RATTLER
(JaJUAN)
Petition for review denied
S229458 D066945 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 IN RE SKYLAR G.
Petition for review denied
S229459 A142685 First Appellate District, Div. 5 IN RE L.A.
Petition for review denied
S229467 E060664 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 COPPINGER, JR., (JOSEPH)
v. RAWLINS (ROGELIO)
Petition for review denied
S229471 D065728 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. LEIPER
(EDWARD ISON)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1799
S229473 F068228 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. SHEPHERD, SR.,
(WILLIAM CHARLES)
Petition for review denied
S229474 B260998 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 IN RE V.R.
Petition for review denied
S229479 A146153 First Appellate District, Div. 5 GRAY (GREGORY LEE) v.
S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for review denied
S229482 TURNER (ANTHONY R.) v.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT
(PEOPLE)
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition denied
S229483 TURNER (ANTHONY R.) v.
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD
APPELLATE DISTRICT
(PEOPLE)
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition denied
S229485 B257959 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 PEOPLE v. CARTER (DEAN
ANTHONY)
Petition for review denied
S229490 B266526 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 GRANDBERRY (DWIGHT)
ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
S229495 E064353 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 DODD (TYLER W.) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1800
S229513 F072216 Fifth Appellate District BILLINGS (CARSON) v. S.C.
(PEOPLE)
Petition for review denied
S229514 B264937 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 WASHINGTON (BONEETIO
KENTRO) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for review denied
S229515 B266748 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 GEMINI ALUMINUM
CORPORATION v. S.C.
(HMA, INC.)
Petition for review denied
S229517 G050919/G050920 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 BENSHALOM (NIV) v. FIRST
HORIZON HOME LOANS
Petition for review denied
S229527 D067094 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. LAZARUS
(ARCHISON T.)
Petition for review denied
S229529 B261762 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 IN RE T.F.
Petition for review denied
S229530 A145899 First Appellate District, Div. 1 CALIFORNIA PIZZA
KITCHEN, INC. v. S.C.
(MUSE)
Petition for review denied
S229534 B247784 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. REYNOLDS
(HAISANI)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1801
S229540 B256679 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. GRANT
(BRITTANY)
Petition for review denied
S225939 SALVADOR-TORRES
(MANUEL) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Villa (2009) 45 Cal.4th 1063,
1069-1076.)
S225950 WHITE (JACKIE D.) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S226537 VALENCIA (SAUL) ON H.C
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Villa (2009) 45 Cal.4th 1063,
1069-1076.)
S227511 ODELL (RICHARD) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769; In re
Waltreus (1965) 62 Cal.2d 218, 225; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304; In re Miller (1941)
17 Cal.2d 734, 735.)
S227633 HILL (KEVIN JEROME) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735.)
S227635 METZ (ANTHONY GILES)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227637 BROWN (WILLIAM) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Dexter (1979) 25 Cal.3d 921, 925.)
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1802
S227638 SMITH (KONOLUS) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227704 FAULKNER (MICHAEL
JAMES) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227738 MILLER (ULYSSES
GORDON) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227928 BOYD (BOMANI LAWAN)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227945 HUNT (JAMES JAY) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227990 BARRETT (JOHN THOMAS)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227991 DAVIS (FLOYD La’QUINCY)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227992 HIGHTOWER (TERRELL
GARY) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S227993 RICHARDSON (ERIN) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1803
S228032 OLIC (MILORAD) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Dexter (1979) 25 Cal.3d 921, 925.)
S228033 OLIC (MILORAD) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228066 SAIF’ULLAH (KHALIFAH
E.D.) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228067 FARMER (A. DESHAUN) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228068 LUPERCIO (RAMON
NAVARRO) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735.)
S228119 GARCIA (RICHARD J.) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759; In
re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304.)
S228121 LINSON (VAUGHN) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228142 HAYES (HENRY C.) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769.)
S228143 MURGUIA (GREGORIO) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1804
S228175 RICHARD (LEON BILLY) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228180 JOHNSON (JOE RANDEL)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228199 BRAUN (BRUCE) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228438 HENDERSON (RODNEY
WAYNE) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769.)
S228441 KARAFILI (ENVER) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228442 BUCKLEY (BOBBY JOE) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780.)
S228444 GONZALEZ (GEORGE A.)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228449 BARROSO (DENNIS J.) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228450 NORMAN (JAMES) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1805
S228453 BENJAMIN (KENNETH
ANDREW) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228458 McGINNIS (RAYMOND) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769.)
S228459 JONES (TOBY) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228464 INSIXIENGMAY (JAY) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304.)
S228471 KIMBRO (RICHARD) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759.)
S228480 MORGAN (JORGE) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304.)
S228482 JOHNSON (TEDDINO) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228487 REYNOLDS (FERDINAND)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1806
S228494 HICKMAN (OTIS) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474;
In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304.)
S228495 SOLIS (SAMMY BRICENO)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Waltreus (1965) 62 Cal.2d 218, 225.)
S228496 SWAIN (TYRONE) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759.)
S228556 COFIELD (VINCENT E.) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 797-798; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735; People v.
Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474.)
S228560 GURROLA (ADRIAN
FERNANDO) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228881 LARKIN (SHONDEL LAMAR)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S228933 YOUNG (HOWARD ALLEN)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 797-798; People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474; In re
Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304.)
S228942 McGINNIS (RAYMOND) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769.)
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1807
S229360 AMBRIZ (SILVERIO) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474;
In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304.)
S229583 YOUNG (HOWARD ALLEN)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 797-798; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735.)
S229584 YOUNG (HOWARD ALLEN)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780;
In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 797-798.)
S229704 CHRISTOPHER (MICHAEL
ALEXANDER) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
S229904 BUTLER (JOHN) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474;
In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304.)
S229985 CARREON (LUIS) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Dexter (1979) 25 Cal.3d 921,
925-926; People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474.)
S227750 A139411 First Appellate District, Div. 2 BUTLER (ROY) ON H.C.
Depublication request denied (case closed)
The requests for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal are
denied.
Werdegar, J., was recused and did not participate.
S228425 D064756 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 FURRH (GAIL K. & OTHAR
DEAN), MARRIAGE OF
Publication request denied (case closed)
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1808
S228735 B258042 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 KELLEHER (WILLIAM J.) v.
GLASSCOE (MARGARET T.)
Publication request denied (case closed)
S228880 C076119 Third Appellate District IN RE JOSHUA D.
Publication request denied (case closed)
S228997 B263759 Second Appellate District, Div. 2 IN RE MARIAH H.
Publication request denied (case closed)
S229075 B263246 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 E. (N.) v. S.C. (LOS ANGELES
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
CHILDREN & FAMILY
SERVICES)
Publication request denied (case closed)
S040704 PEOPLE v. JOHNSEN (BRIAN
DAVID)
Extension of time granted
Good cause appearing, and based upon Deputy Attorney General A. Kay Lauterbach’s
representation that the respondent’s brief is anticipated to be filed by May 2, 2016, counsel’s
request for an extension of time in which to file that brief is granted to December 29, 2015. After
that date, only two further extensions totaling about 124 additional days is contemplated.
S146528 PEOPLE v. SNYDER
(JANEEN MARIE) &
THORNTON (MICHAEL
FORREST)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant Michael Thornton and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the
time to serve and file appellant’s opening brief is extended to December 28, 2015.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1809
S146528 PEOPLE v. SNYDER
(JANEEN MARIE) &
THORNTON (MICHAEL
FORREST)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant Janeen Marie Snyder and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the
time to serve and file appellant’s opening brief is extended to December 28, 2015.
S188961 PEOPLE v. ZANON (DAVID
CHARLES)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time to serve and file
appellant’s opening brief is extended to December 28, 2015.
S196994 BOOKER (RICHARD
LONNIE) ON H.C.
Extension of time granted
Good cause appearing, and based upon counsel Robert M. Sanger’s representation that the reply
to the informal response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus is anticipated to be filed by
November 27, 2015, counsel’s request for an extension of time in which to file that document is
granted to November 30, 2015. After that date, no further extension is contemplated.
S216626 TOWNSEL (ANTHONY
LETRICE) ON H.C.
Extension of time granted
Good cause appearing, and based upon Supervising Deputy State Public Defender Evan Young’s
representation that the reply to the informal response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus is
anticipated to be filed by June 2, 2016, counsel’s request for an extension of time in which to file
that document is granted to December 29, 2015. After that date, only three further extensions
totaling about 157 additional days will be granted.
S221215 PRECIADO (GERARDO) ON
H.C.
Extension of time granted
On application of petitioner and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time to serve and file
the reply to informal response is extended to November 25, 2015.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1810
S221519 CÁSARES (JOSÉ) ON H.C.
Extension of time granted
Good cause appearing, and based upon Deputy Attorney General David A. Lowe’s representation
that the informal response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus is anticipated to be filed by
February 24, 2016, counsel’s request for an extension of time in which to file that document is
granted to December 28, 2015. After that date, only one further extension totaling about 60
additional days is contemplated.
S221958 E054056 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. CANIZALES
(MICHAEL RAFAEL)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant Michael Canizales and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the
time to serve and file the reply brief on the merits is extended to December 4, 2015.
S223425 COX (JOHN ALLEN) ON H.C.
Extension of time granted
On application of respondent and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time to serve and file
the informal response is extended to November 2, 2015.
S224701 LEWIS, SR., (KEITH ALLEN)
ON H.C.
Extension of time granted
Good cause appearing, and based upon counsel Pamala Sayasane’s representation that the reply to
the informal response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus is anticipated to be filed by
October 3, 2016, counsel’s request for an extension of time in which to file that document is
granted to December 18, 2015. After that date, only five further extensions totaling about 290
additional days are contemplated.
S227393 D064133 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 KABRAN (BERTHE
FELICITE) v. SHARP
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
Extension of time granted
On application of respondent and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time to serve and file
the answer brief on the merits is extended to November 25, 2015.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1811
S228049 D060969 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. WHITE (BILLY
CHARLES)
Extension of time granted
On application of respondent and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time to serve and file
the opening brief on the merits is extended to December 29, 2015.
No further extension of time will be granted.
S228642 E061754 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. S.C. (MORALES)
Extension of time granted
On application of real party in interest and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time to
serve and file the opening brief on the merits is extended to November 30, 2015.
S227665 C075352 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. FISCH (SEAN
MICHAEL)
Counsel appointment order filed
Upon request of appellant for appointment of counsel, John Schuck is hereby appointed to
represent appellant on the appeal now pending in this court.
S228198 PEOPLE v. NASH (KATILA
ANN JEAN)
Counsel appointment order filed
Upon request of appellant Katila Ann Jean Nash for appointment of counsel, Madeline McDowell
is hereby appointed to represent appellant on the appeal now pending in this court.
S228198 PEOPLE v. NASH (KATILA
ANN JEAN)
Counsel appointment order filed
Upon request of appellant David Deshawn Moses for appointment of counsel, Jeffrey Kross is
hereby appointed to represent appellant on the appeal now pending in this court.
S228932 B256036 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 PEOPLE v. SMITH (DAVID)
Counsel appointment order filed
Upon request of appellant for appointment of counsel, Nancy Tetreault is hereby appointed to
represent appellant on the appeal now pending in this court.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1812
S073823 PEOPLE v. BUENROSTRO
(DORA)
Motion for access to sealed record granted
On the court’s own motion, the Clerk is directed to unseal the following portion of the sealed
record on appeal and make it part of the public record: Riverside County Case No. Case
M-17194, Sealed Reporter’s Transcript Volumes 1-5, pages 1-1226.
S009141 PEOPLE v. JONES (JEFFREY
GERARD)
Order filed
At the request of Attorney Joseph Schlesinger, the “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” received
on July 24, 2015, is withdrawn, and the Clerk is directed to return it and the exhibits received on
that date to Attorney Schlesinger. The Clerk is further directed to file (1) the “Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus,” and (2) the “Exhibits in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,”
received on September 18, 2015, submitted by Attorney Michael R. Snedeker.
S016883 PEOPLE v. MASTERS
(JARVIS)
Order filed
Masters’s “Request for Judicial Notice,” filed October 23, 2015, is denied.
The Clerk is directed to file Masters’s supplemental brief, received October 26, 2015. If
respondent chooses to submit a supplemental brief, it must not exceed 2800 words and must be
served and filed within 14 days of this order; any supplemental reply thereto must not exceed
1400 words and must be served and filed by Masters within 7 days thereafter. The provisions of
California Rules of Court, rule 8.25(b)(3) will not apply.
Although this case is scheduled to be argued on November 3, 2015, the matter will be submitted
on the date that the last supplemental brief is or could be timely filed under this order or any
subsequent order of this court. (See California Rules of Court, rule 8.524(h)(1).)
S218247 LANCASTER (MARCUS) ON
H.C.
Order filed
Petitioner’s application for relief from default filed on October 26, 2015, is granted.
S220936 A138642 First Appellate District, Div. 1 GALEN (SCOTT) v. REDFIN
CORPORATION
Order filed
The order dismissing review in the above-entitled matter, filed on September 30, 2015, is vacated
nunc pro tunc.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1813
S227938 PEOPLE v. GARCIA (ERIC
GEOVANIE)
Order filed
The order filed on October 20, 2015, appointing J. Courtney Shevelson to represent appellant
Samuel David Navarro is hereby vacated.
S225391 CARLE (ERIC BRENDAN)
ON H.C.
Motion to file document under seal denied
Respondent’s “Application to File Informal Response and Exhibits Under Seal,” filed on
September 8, 2105, is denied. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.550, 2.551, and 8.46.) The clerk of
this court is directed to return the unredacted Informal Response and the “Exhibits in Support of
the Informal Response,” lodged conditionally under seal in this court on June 15, 2015, to
respondent, unless respondent notifies the clerk in writing within 10 days after the date of this
order that the Informal Response and the lodged exhibits are to be filed as part of the public
record. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.46(d)(7).)
S229266 McGEE (JAMES LEE) v. S.C.
(McGEE)
Transferred to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District
The above-entitled matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District.
S229491 DANIELS (MICHAEL) v. S.C.
(PEOPLE)
Transferred to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District
The above-entitled matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, for
consideration in light of Hagan v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 767. In the event the Court of
Appeal determines that this petition is substantially identical to a prior petition, the repetitious
petition must be denied.
S229151 ACCUSATION OF GLAUDE
Petition denied (accusation)
S229516 ACCUSATION OF LACY
Petition denied (accusation)
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1814
S227680 BOLANOS ON DISCIPLINE
Petition for review denied; recommended discipline imposed
The petition for review is denied. The Court orders that ALDON LOUIS BOLANOS, State Bar
number 233915, is suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that
period of suspension is stayed, and he is placed on probation for two years subject to the
following conditions:
1. ALDON LOUIS BOLANOS is suspended from the practice of law for the first 90 days of
his probation.
2. ALDON LOUIS BOLANOS must comply with the provisions of the State Bar Act, the
Rules of Professional Conduct, and all of the conditions of his probation.
3. Within 10 days of any change in the information required to be maintained on the
membership records of the State Bar pursuant to Business and Professions Code section
6002.1, subdivision (a), including his current office address and telephone number, or if no
office is maintained, the address to be used for State Bar purposes, he must report such
change in writing to the Membership Records Office and the State Bar Office of Probation.
4. Within 30 days after the effective date of discipline, he must contact the Office of Probation
and schedule a meeting with his assigned probation deputy to discuss the terms and
conditions of probation. Upon the direction of the Office of Probation, he must meet with
the probation deputy either in person or by telephone. During the period of probation, he
must promptly meet with the probation deputy as directed and upon request.
5. Subject to the assertion of applicable privileges, he must answer fully, promptly, and
truthfully any inquiries of the Office of Probation that are directed to him personally or in
writing, relating to whether he is complying or has complied with the conditions contained
herein.
6. He must submit written quarterly reports to the Office of Probation on each January 10,
April 10, July 10, and October 10, of the period of probation. Under penalty of perjury, he
must state whether he has complied with the State Bar Act, the Rules of Professional
Conduct, and all of the conditions of probation during the preceding calendar quarter. In
addition to all quarterly reports, a final report, containing the same information, is due no
later than 20 days before the last day of the probation period and no later than the last day of
the probation period.
7. Within one year after the effective date of the discipline herein, he must submit to the Office
of Probation satisfactory evidence of completion of the State Bar’s Ethics School and the
State Bar’s Client Trust Accounting School and passage of the tests given at the end of those
sections. This requirement is separate from any Minimum Continuing Legal Education
(MCLE) requirement, and he shall not receive MCLE credit for attending Ethics and Client
Trust Accounting rules. (Rules Proc. of State Bar, rule 3201.)
8. The period of probation will commence on the effective date of this order. At the expiration
of the period of probation, if he has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of
stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be terminated.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1815
ALDON LOUIS BOLANOS must also take the Multistate Professional Responsibility
Examination within one year after the effective date of this order and provide satisfactory proof of
such passage to the State Bar’s Office of Probation within the same period. Failure to do so may
result in automatic suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)
ALDON LOUIS BOLANOS must also comply with the California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and
perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days,
respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may result in disbarment or
suspension.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and is a money judgment.
S228803 FRIEDMAN ON DISCIPLINE
Petition for review denied; recommended discipline imposed
The petition for review is denied. The court orders that NATHANIEL JAY FRIEDMAN, State
Bar Number 33135, is suspended from the practice of law in California for two years, execution
of that period of suspension is stayed, and he is placed on probation for two years subject to the
following conditions:
1. NATHANIEL JAY FRIEDMAN is suspended from the practice of law for the first sixty
days of probation;
2. NATHANIEL JAY FRIEDMAN must comply with the other conditions of probation
recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Decision filed on
July 1, 2015; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if NATHANIEL JAY FRIEDMAN has
complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied
and that suspension will be terminated.
NATHANIEL JAY FRIEDMAN must also take and pass the Multistate Professional
Responsibility Examination within one year after the effective date of this order and provide
satisfactory proof of such passage to the State Bar’s Office of Probation in Los Angeles within the
same period. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S228764 BERGLUND ON DISCIPLINE
Request for rehearing of State Bar discipline denied – GEORGE DARRELL BERGLUND
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1816
S226441 BEELER ON RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of GARY BRETT BEELER, State Bar Number
87871, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If GARY BRETT BEELER
subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary charges that are
currently pending against him.
GARY BRETT BEELER must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and
perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days,
respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S226969 MORRIS ON RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of EDWARD AUSTIN MORRIS, State Bar
Number 72014, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If EDWARD AUSTIN
MORRIS subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary charges
that are currently pending against him.
EDWARD AUSTIN MORRIS must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court
and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar
days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S227064 HERNANDEZ ON
RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of FERNANDO V. HERNANDEZ, State Bar
Number 40498, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If FERNANDO V.
HERNANDEZ subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary
charges that are currently pending against him.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1817
FERNANDO V. HERNANDEZ must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court
and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar
days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S227065 NADASI ON RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of LESLIE FERENC NADASI, State Bar
Number 81237, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If LESLIE FERENC
NADASI subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary charges
that are currently pending against him.
LESLIE FERENC NADASI must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and
perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days,
respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S227068 NOLAN ON RESIGNATION
Resignation declined
This court, having considered the request, declines to accept the voluntary resignation with
charges pending of MARY ALICE NOLAN, State Bar Number 108907, as a member of the State
Bar of California. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.21(d).) MARY ALICE NOLAN remains on
inactive status. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.21(a).) She may move the State Bar Court to be
restored to active status, at which time the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel may demonstrate any
basis for her continued ineligibility to practice law. The State Bar Court will expedite the
resolution of any request by MARY ALICE NOLAN to be restored to active status. Any return to
active status will be conditioned on MARY ALICE NOLAN’s payment of any dues, penalty
payments, and restitution owed by her. The underlying disciplinary matter should proceed
promptly.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1818
S227184 WRIGHT ON RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of DENNIS LYNN WRIGHT, State Bar Number
60210, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If DENNIS LYNN WRIGHT
subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary charges that are
currently pending against him.
DENNIS LYNN WRIGHT must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and
perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days,
respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S227854 ATKIN ON RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of JEROME WILLIAM ATKIN, State Bar
Number 105356, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If JEROME WILLIAM
ATKIN subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary charges that
are currently pending against him.
JEROME WILLIAM ATKIN must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court
and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar
days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S228036 ADLER ON RESIGNATION
Resignation declined
This court, having considered the request, declines to accept the voluntary resignation with
charges pending of JACK ISRAEL ADLER, State Bar Number 97380, as a member of the State
Bar of California. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.21(d).) He remains on inactive status. (Cal. Rules
of Court, rule 9.21(a).) He may move the State Bar Court to be restored to active status, at which
time the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel may demonstrate any basis for his continued
ineligibility to practice law. The State Bar Court will expedite the resolution of any request by
JACK ISRAEL ADLER to be restored to active status. Any return to active status will be
conditioned on JACK ISRAEL ADLER’s payment of any dues, penalty payments, and restitution
owed by him. The underlying disciplinary matter should proceed promptly.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1819
S228038 ANDERSON ON
RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of DANIEL DEON ANDERSON, State Bar
Number 224878, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If DANIEL DEON
ANDERSON subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary
charges that are currently pending against him.
DANIEL DEON ANDERSON must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court
and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar
days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S228040 GROVES ON RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of MICHAEL KING GROVES, State Bar
Number 110645, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If MICHAEL KING
GROVES subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary
proceedings that are currently pending against him.
MICHAEL KING GROVES must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and
perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days,
respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S228786 SILVOLA ON RESIGNATION
Resignation accepted with disciplinary proceeding pending
The voluntary resignation with charges pending of ANDRE KEITH SILVOLA, State Bar Number
109154, as a member of the State Bar of California is accepted. If ANDRE KEITH SILVOLA
subsequently seeks reinstatement, the State Bar may consider all disciplinary charges that are
currently pending against him.
SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER 28, 2015 1820
ANDRE KEITH SILVOLA must also comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and
perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days,
respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may be considered in any
future reinstatement proceeding.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
BAR MISC. 4186 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE COMMITTEE
OF BAR EXAMINERS OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEYS (MOTION NO. 1,226)
The written motion of the Committee of Bar Examiners that the following named applicants, who
have fulfilled the requirements for admission to practice law in the State of California, be
admitted to the practice of law in this state is hereby granted, with permission to the applicants to
take the oath before a competent officer at another time and place:
(SEE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR THE LIST OF NAMES ATTACHED.)
B262529 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 PETIKYAN (SUSANA) v. ELK
ST. PROPERTIES
The above-entitled matter, now pending in the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, is
transferred from Division One to Division Two.
B264055 Second Appellate District, Div. 2 ROUTE 66 CPAS, LLC v.
GLENDORA COURTYARD,
LLC
The above-entitled matter, now pending in the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, is
transferred from Division Two to Division One.
B265521 Second Appellate District PEOPLE v. N.C.
The above-entitled matter, now pending in the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, is
transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District.