Corrections: "Cause and Some Positive Causal Impact"Source: Noûs, Vol. 33, Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives, 13, Epistemology (1999), pp.519-520Published by: WileyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676116 .

Accessed: 14/06/2014 06:32

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

.

Wiley is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Noûs.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.49 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 06:32:09 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Philosophical Perspectives, 13, Epistemology, 1999

CORRECTIONS TO IGAL KVART, "CAUSE AND SOME POSITIVE CAUSAL IMPACT," PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES 11

MIN1:),CAUSATION,ANDWORLD, 1997

P. 405, line 12 from bottom: Thus, choosing a cause

should read Thus, a suitable cause

P. 407, line 23: sold my stock

should read sold his stock

P. 407, line 11 from bottom: A > C

should read A > B

P. 408, line 23: True factual statements

should read In schema (I), true factual statements

P. 414, lines 7 and 8 from bottom: and also (14)-for no E2

should read but not (14) for any E2

P. 416, line 3 from bottom: is not a cause A

should read is not a cause

P. 420, line 4: intermediate course WAT, C

should read intermediate course WA' C

P. 422, line 13: {P(C/WiA) }

should read {P(CIWi A,)}

P. 422, lines 3 and 4 from bottom:

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.49 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 06:32:09 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

520 / Igal Kvart

chance-consequent counterfactuals should read

counterfactual probability increase P. 427, note 33, line 4:

single causal interaction should read

single causal process P. 430, note 75, line 4:

for AD should read

for A D and C P. 430, note 82, line 11 from bottom:

(tC )

should read (tC te)

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.49 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 06:32:09 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions