SUMMARY SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT LITTLE PLUMSTEAD …

SUMMARY SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT DESK STUDY AND SAMPLING LITTLE PLUMSTEAD PRIMARY SCHOOL FOR NPS SOUTH EAST LTD DELTA-SIMONS PROJECT NO. 12-0419.01

FINAL

SUMMARY SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT DESK STUDY AND SAMPLING LITTLE PLUMSTEAD PRIMARY SCHOOL FOR NPS SOUTH EAST LTD DELTA-SIMONS PROJECT NO. 12-0419.01

This Report was issued in September 2012 and prepared by:

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants, The Lawn, Union Road, Lincoln, LN1 3BL

Tel: 0870 0400 012 Fax: 01522 882567 www.deltasimons.com Reports printed by Delta-Simons are printed on 100% recycled paper

FINAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Authorisation .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Context & Purpose ........................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope ............................................................................................................... 2

2.0 INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY .................................................................... 3 2.1 Desk Study....................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Conceptual Site Model ..................................................................................... 3 2.3 Setting Out & Services ..................................................................................... 4 2.4 Dynamic Sampler Boreholes ........................................................................... 4 2.5 Standpipe Installations ..................................................................................... 5 2.6 Dynamic Penetration Tests .............................................................................. 5 2.7 Borehole Falling Head Test ............................................................................. 5 2.8 Gas/Groundwater Monitoring ........................................................................... 5 2.9 Chemical Analysis ............................................................................................ 6 2.10 Geotechnical Testing ..................................................................................... 6

3.0 RESULTS & INTERPRETATION ......................................................................... 7 3.1 Desk Study....................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Fieldworks Interpretation .................................................................................. 9 3.3 Conclusions and Actions ................................................................................ 11

4.0 LIMITATIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS ................................... 14

Tables

Table 1 Initial Conceptual Site Model

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Plan Figure 2 Relevant Features Plan Figure 3 Approximate Locations of Boreholes and Penetration Testing

Appendices Appendix I Sitecheck Report & Geology Report Appendix II Historical Maps Appendix III Risk Definitions Appendix IV Borehole Records, Dynamic Penetration Records &

Permeability Testing Appendix V Chemical Analysis Appendix VI Geotechnical Testing Appendix VII Generic Assessment Criteria; Residential

FINAL

SUMMARY SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT

DESK STUDY AND SAMPLING

LITTLE PLUMSTEAD PRIMARY SCHOOL

FOR NPS SOUTH EAST LTD

DELTA-SIMONS PROJECT NO. 12.0419.01

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Authorisation

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited (Delta-Simons) was instructed by

NPS South East Ltd to carry out a site investigation at Little Plumstead Primary

School, Little Plumstead, Norwich (hereafter referred to as the “Site”), prior to

construction of a new low-rise extension of the existing school, a new free-standing

building and extension of the car park. The location of this Site is shown on Figure 1.

1.2 Context & Purpose

At the time of the work, the land concerned had not been identified as requiring

detailed site investigation for the purposes of planning conditions associated with

either contaminated or unstable land. The purpose of this investigation was to

undertake an initial limited appraisal of the geo-environmental condition and obtain

data on chemical and geotechnical conditions at the Site for use by the developer

and contractors considering potential development abnormals and cost/timescales

planning. This Report has been based on a brief desk study together with fieldworks

comprising soil sampling, ground gas monitoring and in-situ geotechnical testing.

Selected soil samples were scheduled for a suite of chemical analysis for common

contaminants, and some samples were scheduled for geotechnical testing.

Monitoring was carried out on the Site for water levels and hazardous ground gas.

The results of the desk study and the sampling with the relevant laboratory work

have been presented in the Appendices.

The methods of desk study and fieldworks have been described in Section 2.

The interpretation of the results has been presented as a table in Section 3 with desk

study, a conceptual site model (CSM) and initial risk assessment based on the

source-pathway-receptor principle and recommendations for aspects of design and

construction.

Summary Site Investigation Report Little Plumstead Primary School Delta-Simons Project Number 12-0419.01 Page 2

FINAL

1.3 Scope

The scope of works performed for this Summary Site Investigation (SSI) comprised

the following:

Desk Study;

Soil sampling;

In-situ penetration testing;

In-situ permeability testing;

Laboratory testing;

Ground gas monitoring;

Contamination assessment; and

Geotechnical assessment.


FINAL

2.0 INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY

2.1 Desk Study

Guidance on desk study practice and interpretation is provided in British Standard

BS10175 “Investigation of potentially contaminated sites – Code of practice”, BS5930

“Code of practice for site investigations”, and the Environment Agency publication

CLR11 “Model Procedures for the management of land contamination” and

associated documents including Industry Profiles. As the Site has not been identified

as potentially contaminated, the full risk assessment process has not been

undertaken at this stage.

Basic risk assessment in geotechnics and contamination is provided by the third

party supplied data in Appendix I. A walkover has been conducted by an

experienced scientist or engineer to a standard methodology and where appropriate

relevant features have been marked on Figure 2. Historical maps of the Site since

circa 1890 to recent were inspected and representative and informative examples

have been reproduced in Appendix II.

2.2 Conceptual Site Model

A conceptual exposure model represents the relationships between contaminant

sources, pathways and receptors, to support the identification and assessment of

possible pollutant linkages (PPL) - and an assessment of known pollutant linkages,

where identified from existing information.

Where PPLs are identified, a preliminary risk assessment is carried out to assess the

likelihood that each possible linkage exists and to decide whether these pose

potentially unacceptable risks to identified receptors and require further assessment.

Where this linkage is of a form that subsequently leads to land being identified as

‘contaminated land’ under the terms of Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act

1990, the linkage is termed a significant pollutant linkage.

At the preliminary risk assessment stage, which is usually based upon desk top

information, the decision on whether a possible pollutant linkage poses a potentially

unacceptable risk is based upon professional judgement. The significance of the

possible pollutant linkage will also be determined dependant on the context of the

land use and the purpose of the assessment.


FINAL

Assessing risks from land contamination underpins the “suitable for use” approach

adopted for Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 regulatory regime and

the National Planning Policy Framework, March 2012.

Based on the information obtained from this assessment, a preliminary risk

assessment using the source-pathway-receptor approach has been formulated,

which identifies possible pollutant linkages at the Site in the context of the proposed

end-use. The CSM is presented at the end of Section 3 and it takes into account the

relevant findings of the fieldwork. Appendix III contains risk assessment definitions.

2.3 Setting Out & Services

Exploratory hole and subsequent sample locations were selected to provide suitable

coverage of the Site, having regard for the likely presence of services and any other

Site-specific constraints such as existing structures and finishes.

Prior to any excavation being undertaken, a cable detector was used at sampling

positions to avoid electric cables. Where there was still concern over services a

hand auger was used to excavate the initial 1 m depth.

The locations of the boreholes and penetration tests are shown on Figure 3 and the

records of the fieldworks are shown in Appendix IV.

2.4 Dynamic Sampler Boreholes

The dynamic sampler system comprises a series of varying diameter metal tubes of

1 m or 2 m length, which have a window cut into the side. The tubes are driven into

the ground using a percussive weight falling through a standard drop onto an anvil

attached to solid rods, and withdrawn by use of a hydraulic jack. The soil is pushed

into the tube during the driving, and samples are taken by a trowel directly through

the window. In the windowless system, a 1 m or 2 m long thick-walled open-tube

sampler with plastic liner is driven into the ground by the same method. The

windowless method offers a lower degree of sample disturbance and therefore can

provide a better quality sample.

The system can achieve typical depths of around 3 m to 5 m in favourable soil

conditions. The system is limited by coarse gravel or other large fragments, and also

in wet sands where the hole collapses.


FINAL

The details of the ground conditions encountered are presented on the relevant

record sheets, which also detail the type and depths of samples taken and the results

of any in-situ tests. Other relevant information may also be recorded including

groundwater levels and details of any standpipe installations.

2.5 Standpipe Installations

One of the dynamic sampler boreholes has been fitted with a gas/water monitoring

standpipe of 50 mm internal diameter UPVC slotted and plain casing to the required

depth as appropriate, capped by a gas tap bung and cover. The location of the

monitoring installation is shown on Figure 3.

2.6 Dynamic Penetration Tests

Dynamic penetration testing is undertaken in accordance with BS1377 Part

9:1990:3.2 DPSH, where 1 m threaded metal rods with a sacrificial cone tip are

driven into the ground via a 63.5 kg weight falling over a 750 mm distance onto an

anvil resting on the rods. The number of blows taken for 100 mm penetration is

recorded until the required depth is reached. The rods are removed using a jack,

and the results presented graphically.

2.7 Borehole Falling Head Test

A borehole falling head test involves filling a shallow depth dynamic sampler

borehole with water to a recorded level. The depth to the water level in the hole is

recorded using an electronic dip meter at regular intervals until the water has

dissipated, or over a suitable period of minimum 60 minutes. The results are used to

determine an approximate soil permeability in accordance with a method derived

from BS 5930:1999. This method of testing should only be considered to give an

indication of the potential suitability of using conventional soakaways and may

require confirmation of design parameters through other techniques.

2.8 Gas/Groundwater Monitoring

Groundwater monitoring is undertaken using an electronic dip meter, which records

the depth to water in a standpipe. Ground gas composition and flow monitoring may

be undertaken where semi-permanent standpipes have been installed. Both flow

(litres per hour) and composition (%) are measured using an infra-red gas monitor,

calibrated for methane, carbon dioxide & oxygen. Records are also taken of

atmospheric pressure.


FINAL

2.9 Chemical Analysis

The results of the chemical analysis are provided in Appendix V.

2.10 Geotechnical Testing

The results of the geotechnical testing are provided in Appendix VI.


FINAL

3.0 RESULTS & INTERPRETATION

3.1 Desk Study

Site Description & Walkover

The Site is located off Hospital Road, Little Plumstead, Norfolk, approximately 7.7 kilometres east of the centre of Norwich. The Site comprises an irregular shaped parcel of land measuring approximately 155 m long by 170 m wide (at its widest point), accessed directly off Hospital Road. A walkover was undertaken on 23rd August 2012. The relevant features identified during the walkover are shown in Figure 2 and described below. The Site incorporates Little Plumstead CE VA Primary School comprising school buildings, playing fields, hard play areas, car parking and soft landscaping. Numerous semi-mature and mature trees were noted within the school grounds and along the north, west and south Site boundaries. The boundary in the north-east corner was defined by a brick wall, which marks the boundary between the school grounds and a cemetery to the north. The main school building comprised a relatively recently constructed low-rise brick structure with flat roofing. Numerous wooden and plastic small outbuildings were also noted on-Site. The topography of the Site was generally flat, sloping gradually to the east in line with the surrounding area. Soft landscaping in the west of the Site was terraced, with this area being approximately 1-2 m higher than the centre of the Site. There was a small grassed mound in the north-east of the Site, adjacent to the school building. No evidence was observed of potential contamination from fuel storage tanks, soil stockpiles, hazardous material stores or invasive plants.

Current Land Feature Sources

The Sitecheck Data shows there are no currently listed potentially contaminative land uses on-Site. Off-Site current potentially contaminative land uses include one contemporary trade directory entry. See Appendix I for further details.

Historical Land Feature Sources

The Sitecheck Data shows one on-Site potentially contaminative historical land use, indicated to be a hospital. Off-Site, the Sitecheck Data identifies one historical electricity substation at approximately 230 m east of the Site. From historical mapping, the Site appears undeveloped until sometime prior to the 1950s, by which time a track was shown to pass through the Site. By the 1980s a pavilion and bowling green


FINAL

were shown in the south of the Site. The surrounding area has been predominantly agricultural land, woodland and land associated with Plumstead Hall (hospital) and a church to the east, with playing fields to the south. See Appendix I and II for further details.

Map Geology & Commentary

The BGS mapping shows that the Site is situated upon superficial deposits of the Happisburgh Glacigenic Formation (Diamicton). The underlying bedrock is Crag Group (Sand and Gravel). The Site is within a radon affected area but where no radon protection measures are required according to the Sitecheck Data. There is a low risk of shrinking or swelling ground instability hazards at the Site. No other significant on/off-Site geotechnical hazards are identified in the background data. See Appendix I for more details.

Topographic Elevation

Approximately 20 m above Ordnance Datum (m aOD).

Depth to Groundwater

Shallow groundwater is not anticipated based on archived BGS records viewed online, and is unlikely to be present in shallow excavations.

Surface Water The Sitecheck Data shows one abstraction point and no discharge consents within 250 m of the Site. The nearest surface water feature is a small pond on-Site.

Wider Environment Sensitive Receptors

In terms of groundwater vulnerability, the Site is within an area classified as unproductive strata with respect to the superficial geology and a principal aquifer with regard to the bedrock geology. The Site is within a Source Protection Zone (SPZ): SPZ2 – outer protection zone. The Site is not indicated to be at risk from flooding from rivers or the sea.

Key Contaminants and CSM Aspects

The Site does not have a clearly identified significant former industrial land use and there are no related key contaminants. The Site comprises a primary school. Previous land use at the Site include a pavilion, bowling green and recreational areas associated with a former hospital. On-Site potential sources of contamination include unknown contamination from imported engineering materials and residual demolition waste from previous structures. Off-Site potential sources of contamination are small, distant and are unlikely to have impacted the Site. The Site overlies unproductive strata and a principal aquifer. There is uncertainty because unrecorded potentially contaminative


FINAL

activities could have taken place.

3.2 Fieldworks Interpretation

Geology from the Boreholes

Made Ground was encountered from ground level to depths of between 0.25 and 1.1 m bgl. The Made Ground comprised brown sandy gravelly clay with gravel of flint, brick wood and occasional charcoal. The underlying natural soils comprised orange brown clayey gravelly sand and occasional layers of firm brown sandy gravelly clay below approximately 2.5 m bgl. Natural soils were not encountered in HDTP104 which was terminated in Made Ground at a depth of 1 m bgl. There were no visual or olfactory indications of significant contamination in the Made Ground or the natural soil. The ground conditions are considered to be typically representative of the deposits anticipated from the geological mapping. Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.

Penetration Test Data

The penetration testing recorded variable low to moderate resistance to penetration with occasional very low blow counts between approximately 2 to 3 m bgl.

Borehole Falling Head Test Data

One infilling of borehole HDTP104 was completed. A falling head test result of 4.0 x 10-7 m/s was calculated.

Groundwater in Standpipe

No groundwater encountered.

Gas in Standpipes DS101: 17/09/2012: <0.1 % v.v. methane, 3.6 % v.v. carbon dioxide, 19.0 % v.v. oxygen and flow of <0.1 l/hr. Atmospheric pressure at ground level 1006 mb.

Chemical Analysis Three samples were scheduled for the following analytes: CLEA metals suite, TPH (total), speciated PAH (EPA-16) and asbestos screen. All of the samples tested were below the associated UK criteria for the proposed end-use scenario, which is residential (for criteria see Appendix VII). Concentrations of TPH were recorded at concentrations in excess of the laboratory method detection limit. Asbestos fibres were not detected in the samples tested.

Geotechnical Testing

Moisture content determinations, liquid and plastic limits and a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test were carried out. Moisture content was in the range 5.1 to 23 %. Clay of low to medium volume change potential has been identified


FINAL

according to NHBC guidance. CBR was in the range 67.4 to 71.6 %.

Foundation Recommendations

The ground conditions are considered to be potentially suitable for traditional strip or pad foundations for typical low-rise structures. Initial assessments indicate that an allowable bearing pressure of 75 kN/m2 would be appropriate at a minimum depth of 1 m below existing ground level and beneath any Made Ground or unsuitable soils within orange brown clayey gravelly sand. Localised deepening may be required due to depth of Made Ground and if loose/soft zones are encountered. Reinforcement is recommended due to variability of the natural soils. Clay soils have been identified and foundation depth should be reviewed in accordance with NHBC Standards unless there is a sufficient thickness of sand over the clay to protect against potential shrink/swell. Suspended floor slabs with a naturally ventilated void and damp proof membrane (DPM) provision are recommended for small spans. Ground bearing floor slabs are also potentially suitable following suitable engineering treatment of the formation.

Pavement Design CBR was approximately 70 % for cohesive Made Ground from HDTP104 at 0.5 to 1 m. CBR is dependent on the condition of the strata and could be different upon excavation to the formation subject to seasonal conditions. Clay soils are likely to be frost susceptible. The use of a geotextile is recommended where variable ground conditions are encountered or across changes in strata to protect against potential differential settlement.

Contamination The Site does not have a clearly identified significant former industrial land use and there are no related key contaminants. Potential sources of contamination on-Site include unknown contamination from imported engineering materials and residual demolition waste from previous structures. All of the samples tested were below the associated UK criteria for the proposed end-use scenario. Concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were above laboratory detection limits but at concentrations not of significant concern. No further action is required except vigilance by the groundworker for any unrecorded contamination which should be reported to the Client.

Fresh Water Pipes The local water authority should be contacted at an early stage in order that any abnormal costs can be calculated, if required.


FINAL

Concrete Grade Water soluble sulphate concentrations were all found to be low and the Site can provisionally be classified as Design Sulfate Class DS-1 and Brownfield class ACEC AC-1 in accordance with the BRE Special Digest 1.

Ground Gas There are no significant potential sources of ground gas on or off-Site. The gas monitoring revealed low levels of ground gases and low flow. The provisional NHBC Traffic Light Classification is Green. The foundation recommendations incorporate a degree of inherent gas protection in accordance with BS 8485:2007.

Groundwater/ Drainage

The ground conditions at the Site were found to be variable sand and clay. Groundwater was not encountered during the fieldwork. The falling head test was undertaken within cohesive Made Ground and produced a permeability value of 4 x 10-7 m/s which indicates poor drainage characteristics. Surface water drainage to land may be possible via traditional soakaways in sand. If soakaways are planned, an infiltration rate should be determined for final design purposes through full-scale testing. Alternatives such as discharge to existing facility should also be investigated.

Excavations Trench excavation sides cannot be guaranteed to be stable at this Site, therefore, batters and/or suitable support would be required for excavations. This would also be required where human entry is necessary.

Materials Management

Excavated soils may be suitable for use elsewhere subject to suitability for use and any necessary regulator protocols. Additional testing may be required for optimised off-Site disposal of spoil.

3.3 Conclusions and Actions

Geotechnics Traditional strip or pad foundations are considered to be potentially suitable for typical low-rise structures. An allowable bearing pressure of 75 kN/m2 would be considered achievable at a minimum depth of 1 m below existing ground level in orange brown sand. Reinforcement is recommended due to the variability of the natural soils. Localised deepening may be required due to the depth of Made Ground. Clay soils have been identified and foundation depth should be reviewed in accordance with NHBC Standards. Ground floor slabs are recommended to be suspended with a ventilated void and DPM provision. Ground bearing floor slabs would also be suitable following suitable engineering treatment of the formation. The use of conventional soakaways may be possible in sand and if


FINAL

proposed, an infiltration should be determined by full-scale testing.

Contamination No significant on/off-Site sources of potential contamination were identified. Concentrations of contaminants were all below the relevant screening criteria and low levels of TPH were recorded. No further action is required except for vigilance by the groundworker for the presence of any unrecorded contamination which should be reported to the Client. No significant sources of ground gas have been identified on or off-Site and the provisional NHBC classification is Green.

Materials Management

Contractors may require additional advice on materials management and waste classification which is not covered by this Report.


FINAL

Table 1: Initial Conceptual Site Model

Source Pathway Receptor Matrix Assessment Justification

Potentially contaminated soils (from on-Site sources and

unrecorded on/off-Site land use)

Geology (Vertical migration through permeable deposits

below the Site) Controlled Waters Very Low Risk

Small Site. No significant on/off-Site sources; low levels of TPH. Unproductive strata

overlying principal aquifer.

Direct contact/ingestion and inhalation of dust/fibres and

vapours, oral via plant uptake Human Health Very Low Risk

No significant on/off-Site sources; low levels of TPH. Sensitive receptors to be introduced.

Direct contact and leaching Buildings and structures Low Risk No on/off-Site significant sources identified,

low levels of TPH. Generally robust receptors.

Potential ground gas (from unrecorded on/off-Site

sources) Vertical & lateral migration Human Health Very Low Risk

No significant on/off-Site sources identified. Gas monitoring recorded low concentrations of

ground gas and low flow rates.

Standard risk definitions and matrices are presented in Appendix III.


FINAL

4.0 LIMITATIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS

Comments contained within the Report regarding the hydrology of the Site and the

surrounding area, do not constitute a full flood risk assessment.

In addition, comments contained within the Report regarding the absence of invasive

plants should not be considered to represent a full invasive plant assessment.

It should also be noted that this Report does not constitute a full Site Investigation,

waste classification exercise, contamination, geotechnical or asbestos survey.

Information was obtained, reviewed and evaluated in preparing this Report from

Landmark Information Group. Our conclusions, opinions and recommendations are

based upon this information and the information obtained during the Site walkover,

the Consultant does not warrant the accuracy of the information provided and will not

be responsible for any opinions expressed, or conclusions reached in reliance upon

information which is subsequently proven to be inaccurate.

The recommendations contained in this Report represent our professional opinions.

These opinions were arrived at in accordance with currently accepted industry practices

and hydrological and engineering practices at this time and location and as such are not

a guarantee that the Site is free of hazardous or potentially hazardous materials or

conditions.

This Report was prepared for the sole and exclusive use of the Client and for the

specific purpose instructed as defined in Section 1 of this Report. Nothing contained

in this Report shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than

ourselves and the Client, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken are for the

sole and exclusive benefit of the Client and not for the benefit of any other party. In

particular, this Report should not be disseminated to anyone other than the Client or

to be used or relied upon by anyone other than the Client. Use of the Report by any

other person is unauthorised and such use is at the sole risk of the user. Anyone

using or relying upon this Report, other than the Client, agrees by virtue of its use to

indemnify and hold harmless the authors from and against all claims, losses and

damages (of whatsoever nature and howsoever or whensoever arising), arising out

of or resulting from the performance of the work by the Consultant.


FINAL

In the absence of a full regulatory set of screening values derived using the new

CLEA Framework, this Report will refer to the following:

The new Soil Guidance Values (SGVs) published by the Environment

Agency;

Former SGVs for which no updated SGV has been published;

The 2009 Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH)/Land Quality

Management (LQM) Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC);

The guidance values produced by the Environmental Industries Commission

(EIC), the Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists

(AGS) and Contaminated Land: Application in Real Environments (CL:AIRE)

in December 2009; and

In house Generic Screening Values (HH-GSVs) and other non UK values

where considered relevant.

These guidance values are presented in Appendix VII.

Figures

Figures

A different perspective

TITLE:

Site Location Plan Little Plumstead Primary School, Hospital Road, Little Plumstead, Norwich FIGURE NO.:

1 DATE:

Sept 2012

PROJECT NO.:

12-0419.01 DWN:

1

TITLE:

Relevant Features Plan Little Plumstead Primary School, Hospital Road, Little Plumstead, Norwich FIGURE NO.:

2 DATE:

Sept 2012

PROJECT NO.:

12-0419.01 DWN:

MT

Comments: There is uncertainty as unrecorded land use may have occurred and caused contamination that has not been identified by the observations.

PH04: General site view






TITLE:

Approximate Locations of Boreholes and Penetration Testing Little Plumstead Primary School, Hospital Road, Little Plumstead, Norwich FIGURE NO.:

3 DATE:

August 2012

PROJECT NO.:

12-0419.01 DWN:

MT

North

Not to scale

Legend DS101/ DPT101

Dynamic Sampler with Dynamic Penetration Test

HDTP101 Hand Dug Trial Pit

(S) Standpipe

(SA) Soakaway Test

(CBR) California Bearing Ratio Test

DS101/DPT101 (S)

DS102/DPT102

DS103/DPT103

HDTP104 (SA, CBR)

Appendix

IAppendix I


Little Plumstead Primary School, Hospital Road, Little Plumstead, Norwich, NR13 5EW

Prepared for:Mr J HarrisonDelta Simons3 Chalkhill House19 Rosary RoadNorwichNR1 1SZ Report Reference: SCD_41462835_2_1 Report Date: 19-SEP-2012 Customer Reference: 12-0419.01 Little Plumstead Primary School National Grid Reference: 630590 310780

Site Area: 24173 m²

If you have any questions on the contents of this Report please contact Landmark Customer Helpdesk which is open from 9:00am - 5:30pm, Monday - Friday, via one of the following channels: Telephone: 0844 844 9966Fax: 0844 844 9980Email: [email protected]: www.sitecheck.co.uk

Report Sections and Details Page

Summary of Site

Aerial Photo

Location Map

Summary Table

Current Land Use

Historical Land Use

Sensitivity

Other Factors

Useful Information

Useful Contacts

-

1

2

3

7

9

12

16

17

18

This section comprises contaminant, pathway and receptor information found on site. Other factors which may affectthe site are also included.

The aerial photo gives an overall view of the area. The smaller large-scale Ordnance Survey map includes the site boundary and search zone buffer at 250m.

The large-scale Ordnance Survey map includes the site boundary and search zone buffer at 250m. The smaller aerial photo also includes the site boundary.

This section comprises of a summary table of the information found on site and in its vicinity.

This section contains a map, which shows current land use features. The following pages detail these features and identify the Reference Number and direction.

This section contains a map, which shows historical land use features. The following pages detail these features andidentify the Reference Number and direction. A table listing all the maps used to source this information is included.

This section contains a map, which shows pathway and receptor features. The following pages detail these features and identify the Reference Number and direction. This section also contains a separate Flood Map and flood details.

This section contains information on other factors which may affect the site and its vicinity.

This section contains information which may be of use when interpreting the report.

All textual information is linked by the 'Contact Ref' to this quick reference list of contacts. These contacts may be able to supply additional information or answer any subsequent query relating to that record.

Contents

rpr_sitecheck v39.0

If you would like any further assistance regarding this report then please contactLandmark on (Tel) 0844 844 9966, (Fax) 0844 844 9980, Email: [email protected]

Brought to you by Landmark

Historical Land Use

Sensitivity

Sensitivity

Potentially Contaminative Uses

Pathways

Environmentally Sensitive Receptors

Potentially Contaminative Industrial Uses (Past Land Use)

Groundwater Vulnerability

Drift Deposits

Source Protection Zones

Nearest Surface Water Feature

Hospitals, Date of Mapping: 1938 - 1987

Geological Classification: Major Aquifer (Highly permeable) - These are highly permeable formations usually with a known or probable presence of significant fracturing. They may be highly productive and able to support large abstractions for public water supply and other purposes, Soil Classification: Soils of High Leaching Potential (H2) - Deep, permeable, coarse textured soils which readily transmit a wide range of pollutants because of their rapid drainage and low attenuation potential, Map Scale: 1:100,000, Map Name: Sheet 26 East Norfolk, Contact Ref: 1

Geological Classification: Major Aquifer (Highly permeable) - These are highly permeable formations usually with a known or probable presence of significant fracturing. They may be highly productive and able to support large abstractions for public water supply and other purposes, Soil Classification: Soils of Intermediate Leaching Potential (I1) - Soils which can possibly transmit a wide range of pollutants, Map Scale: 1:100,000, Map Name: Sheet 26 East Norfolk, Contact Ref: 1

Drift Deposit: Low permeability drift deposits occuring at the surface and overlying Major and Minor Aquifers are head, clay-with-flints, brickearth, peat, river terrace deposits and marine and estuarine alluvium Contact Ref: 1

Plumstead Hospital, Reference: An212, Type: Zone II (Outer Protection Zone): Either 25% of the source area or a 400 day travel time whichever is greater., Contact Ref: 1

Various, Reference: Not Supplied, Type: Zone III (Total Catchment): The total area needed to support the discharge from the protected groundwater source., Contact Ref: 1

Distance: 0m

ReferenceNumber(Map ID)



PageNo.

PageNo.

PageNo.

1

-

-

-

-

-

2

10

14

14

14

15

15

14

Summary of Site



Other Factors

Geological

Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas

Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures

Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards

Affected Areas: The property is in a lower probability radon area, as less than 1% of homes are above the action level, Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service, Contact Ref: 2

Radon Protection Measures: None, Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service, Contact Ref: 2

Hazard Potential: Very Low, Contact Ref: 2


Hazard Potential: Low, Contact Ref: 2



PageNo.

-

-

-

-

-

-

16

16

16

16

16

16

Summary of Site





Page 1 of 18

Aerial Photo

SiteLittle Plumstead Primary School,Hospital Road, Little Plumstead,Norwich,NR13 5EW

Grid Reference 630590, 310780

Report Reference SCD_41462835_2_1

Customer Reference 12-0419.01 Little Plumstead Primary School

Size of Site 24173 m²



Page 2 of 18

Location Map

SiteLittle Plumstead Primary School,Hospital Road, Little Plumstead,Norwich,NR13 5EW

Grid Reference 630590, 310780

Report Reference SCD_41462835_2_1

Customer Reference 12-0419.01 Little Plumstead Primary School

Size of Site 24173 m²



Page 3 of 18

Summary Table

Current Land UseContaminants

Waste / Landfill Sites

Statutory Authorisations

Discharge Consents

Industrial Processes

Storage of Hazardous Substances

Contraventions

BGS Recorded Landfill Sites

Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries)

Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)

Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites

Registered Landfill Sites

Registered Waste Transfer Sites

Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites

Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls

Contaminated Land Register Entries and Notices

Registered Radioactive Substances

Discharge Consents

Water Industry Act Referrals

Integrated Pollution Controls

Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites

Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control

Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control

Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)

Explosive Sites

Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS)

Planning Hazardous Substance Consents

Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements

Enforcement and Prohibition Notices

Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements

Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes

Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters

Substantiated Pollution Incident Register

On Site

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0-250m

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0



Page 4 of 18

Summary Table

Current Land Use

Historical Land Use

Sensitivity

Contaminants

Contaminants

Pathways and Receptors


Miscellaneous


Potentially Infilled Land

Pathways

Contemporary Trade Directory Entries

Fuel Station Entries

BGS Recorded Mineral Sites

Historical Tanks And Energy Facilities


Former Marshes

Potentially Infilled Land (Non-Water)

Potentially Infilled Land (Water)


Drift Deposits

Historical Flood Liabilities

Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences

Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences

Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences

Flood Water Storage Areas

Flood Defences

On Site

On Site

On Site

0

1

6

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0-250m

0-250m

0-250m

1

1

2

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

n/a

n/a

0

0

0

0

0

0



Page 5 of 18

Summary Table

SensitivityPathways and Receptors


Protected Countryside Areas

Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Environmentally Sensitive Areas

Local Nature Reserves

Marine Nature Reserves

National Nature Reserves


Ramsar Sites

Sites of Special Scientific Interest


Special Areas of Conservation

Special Protection Areas

Water Abstractions

Forest Parks

National Parks

National Scenic Areas

On Site

6

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0-250m

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0



Page 6 of 18

Summary Table

Other FactorsGeological

Brine Compensation Area

Coal Mining Affected Areas

Mining Instability

Man-Made Mining Cavities

Natural Cavities




Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards




Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain

On Site

7

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

0

0-250m

1

n/a

n/a

0

0

0

0

n/a

n/a

0

0

0

0

1

0



Page 7 of 18

Current Land Use



Page 8 of 18

Current Land Use

Ref No.

Ref No.

SearchBuffer

SearchBuffer

Direction

Direction

Waste / Landfill Sites


Local Authority Landfill Coverage

Contemporary Trade Directory Entries

-

-

3

On Site

On Site

0-250m

NE

NE

E

Name: Norfolk County Council, - Has supplied landfill data, Contact Ref: 4

Name: Broadland District Council, - Has no landfill data to supply, Contact Ref: 3

Little Plumstead Hospital, Hospital Rd, Little Plumstead, Norwich, Norfolk, NR13 5EW, Hospitals, Status: Inactive, Positional Accuracy: Manually positioned to the address or location

Contaminants



Page 9 of 18

Historical Land Use



Page 10 of 18

Historical Land Use

Ref No. SearchBuffer

DirectionPotentially Contaminative Uses

Historical Tanks And Energy Facilities


4

1

0-250m

On Site

E

NE

Electrical Sub Station Facilities, Scale of Mapping: 1:2,500, Date of Mapping: 1972

Hospitals, Date of Mapping: 1938 - 1987

Contaminants



Page 11 of 18

Historical Land Use

Map Details

The following maps have been analysed for Historical Tanks and Energy Facilities

The following maps have been analysed for Potentially Contaminative Uses and Potentially Infilled Land information

1:2,500

1:10,000

1:10,560

Ordnance Survey Plan


Norfolk

Norfolk

Norfolk

Norfolk


TG3010

TG31SW

064_NW

064_NW

064_NW

064_NW

TG31SW

1972

1987

1888

1908

1929

1938

1957

Mapsheet

Mapsheet

Mapsheet

Published

Published

Published



Page 12 of 18

Sensitivity

Flood Map



Page 13 of 18

Sensitivity

Sensitivity Map



Page 14 of 18

Sensitivity

Ref No.

Ref No.

SearchBuffer

SearchBuffer

Direction

Direction

Pathways



Drift Deposits

Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences

Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences

Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences

Flood Water Storage Areas

Flood Defences


-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

On Site

On Site

On Site

On Site

NE

NW

NE

-

-

-

-

-

E

Geological Classification: Major Aquifer (Highly permeable) - These are highly permeable formations usually with a known or probable presence of significant fracturing. They may be highly productive and able to support large abstractions for public water supply and other purposes, Soil Classification: Soils of High Leaching Potential (H2) - Deep, permeable, coarsetextured soils which readily transmit a wide range of pollutants because of their rapid drainageand low attenuation potential, Map Scale: 1:100,000, Map Name: Sheet 26 East Norfolk, Contact Ref: 1

Geological Classification: Major Aquifer (Highly permeable) - These are highly permeable formations usually with a known or probable presence of significant fracturing. They may be highly productive and able to support large abstractions for public water supply and other purposes, Soil Classification: Soils of Intermediate Leaching Potential (I1) - Soils which can possibly transmit a wide range of pollutants, Map Scale: 1:100,000, Map Name: Sheet 26 East Norfolk, Contact Ref: 1

Drift Deposit: Low permeability drift deposits occuring at the surface and overlying Major and Minor Aquifers are head, clay-with-flints, brickearth, peat, river terrace deposits and marine and estuarine alluvium Contact Ref: 1

None

None

None

None

None

Distance: 0m




Page 15 of 18

Sensitivity

Ref No. SearchBuffer

DirectionEnvironmentally Sensitive Receptors


Water Abstractions

-

-

-

5

On Site

On Site

0-250m

0-250m

NE

NE

E

E

Plumstead Hospital, Reference: An212, Type: Zone II (Outer Protection Zone): Either 25% of the source area or a 400 day travel time whichever is greater., Contact Ref: 1

Various, Reference: Not Supplied, Type: Zone III (Total Catchment): The total area needed tosupport the discharge from the protected groundwater source., Contact Ref: 1

Plumstead Hospital, Reference: An212, Type: Zone I (Inner Protection Zone): Travel time of 50 days or less to the groundwater source., Contact Ref: 1

Norwich Community Health Partnership, 2 Bores At Lt Plumstead Hosp'L, Abstractions Miscellaneous, Reference: 7/34/15/*G/0207, Permit Version: 102, Authorised Start: 01 January, Authorised End: 31 December, Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m, Contact Ref: 1




Page 16 of 18

Other Factors

Other FactorsSearchBuffer

Direction

Brine Compensation Area

Coal Mining Affected Areas

Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain




Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards




On Site

On Site

On Site

On Site

On Site

On Site

On Site

0-250m

-

-

-

NE

NE

NE

NE

-

NE

NE

NE

SE

No

In an area which may not be affected by Coal Mining

No Hazard

Affected Areas: The property is in a lower probability radon area, as less than 1% of homes are above the action level, Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service, Contact Ref: 2

Radon Protection Measures: None, Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service, Contact Ref: 2

Hazard Potential: Very Low Contact Ref: 2

Hazard Potential: No Hazard, Contact Ref: 2

No Hazard


Hazard Potential: Very Low Contact Ref: 2

Hazard Potential: Low Contact Ref: 2

Hazard Potential: No Hazard Contact Ref: 2

Geological



Page 17 of 18

Useful Information

Registered Landfill SitesAt present no complete national data set exists for landfill site boundaries, therefore a point grid reference, provided by the data supplier, is used for some landfill sites. In certain cases the point grid references supplied provide only an approximate position and can vary from the site entrance to the centre of the site. Where the exact position of the site is unclear, Landmark construct either a 100 metre or 250 metre "buffer" around the point to warn of the possible presence of landfill. The size of this "buffer" relates to the positional accuracy that can be attributed to the site. The "buffer" is shown on the map as an orange cross-hatched circle and is referred to in the map legend as Potential Landfill Buffer. Where actual boundaries are available, the landfill site area is shown on the map as a red diagonal hatched polygon and referred to in the map legend as Registered Landfill Site.

Local Authority Recorded Landfill SitesLocal Authority landfill data are sourced from individual local authorities that were able to provide information on sites operating prior to the introduction of the Control of Pollution Act (COPA) in 1974. Appropriate authorities are listed under Local Authority Landfill Coverage with an indication of whether or not they were able to make landfill data available. Details of any records identified are disclosed. You should be aware that if the local authority 'Had landfill data but passed it to the relevant environment agency' it does not necessarily mean that local authority landfill data is included in our other Landfill datasets. In addition if no datahas been made available, for all or part of the search area, you should be aware that a negative response under 'Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites' does not necessarily confirm that no local authority landfills exist.

FloodingThe Sitecheck report flood map plots all flood related features revealed within the search area as supplied by the relevant agency. However, to avoid confusion, the text entry in the body of the report only reveals the detail of the nearest feature in each flood dataset. This is also reflected in the summary table where only a single entry is included to indicate the search buffer of the nearest occurrence.

Mining Instability DataThe Mining Instability data was obtained on Licence from Ove Arup + Partners Limited (for further information, contact [email protected]). No reproduction or further use of such data is to be made without the prior written consent of Ove Arup+ Partners Limited. The information and data supplied in the Product are derived from publicly available records and other third party sources and neither Ove Arup + Partners nor Landmark warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information or data.

The information in this Sitecheck Data Report is derived from a number of statutory and non-statutory sources. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, Landmark cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information or data, nor to identify all the factors that may be relevant. If you are a private individual using this report Landmark recommend that you discuss its contents in full with your professional advisor. It is essential to read this report in conjunction with the Product User Guide and your attention is drawn to the scope of the report section within this guide.

The Sitecheck Data User guide is available free of charge from our website www.sitecheck.co.uk

Landmark Information Group Limited 2011. All Rights Reserved. The copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this SitecheckData Report ("Report") is the property of Landmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency and Natural England and must not be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method, except as allowed by Landmark's Terms and Conditions. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions accepted by the customer. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall remain the exclusive property of Landmark and/or other Data Providers, whose copyright material has been included in this Report.



Page 18 of 18

Useful Contacts

Contact Names and Addresses

Other Contacts

1

2

3

4

Environment Agency National Customer Contact Centre (NCCC)

British Geological Survey Enquiry Service

Broadland District Council

Norfolk County Council Planning & Transportation - Minerals & Waste

Landmark Information Group Limited

PO Box 544TempleboroughRotherhamS60 1BY

British Geological SurveyKingsley Dunham CentreKeyworthNottinghamNottinghamshireNG12 5GG

Thorpe LodgeYarmouth RoadThorpe St AndrewNorwichNorfolkNR7 0DU

County HallMartineau LaneNorwichNorfolkNR1 2DH

Legal and FinancialThe Smith CentreFairmileHenley-on-ThamesOxonRG9 6AB

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

www.bgs.ac.uk

www.broadland.gov.uk

www.norfolk.gov.uk

www.landmarkinfo.co.uk

Telephone 08708 506 506

Telephone 0115 936 3143Fax 0115 936 3276

Telephone 01603 431133Fax 01603 700339

Telephone 0844 800 8020Fax 0844 800 8012

Telephone 0844 844 9966Fax 0844 844 9980

Please note that the Environment Agency/SEPA have a charging policy in place for enquiries.

www.norfolk.gov.uk

mailto:[email protected]


www.landmarkinfo.co.uk



www.broadland.gov.uk

www.bgs.ac.uk

Search Code

IMPORTANT CONSUMER PROTECTION INFORMATION

This search has been produced by Landmark Information Group Ltd, The Smith Centre, Fairmile, Henley on Thames, Oxon, RG9 6AB. Telephone: 0844 844 9966, Fax No: 0844 844 9980, email: [email protected] which is registered with the Property Codes Compliance Board (PCCB) as a subscriber to the Search Code. The PCCB independently monitors how registered firms maintain compliance with the Code.

The Search Code:

- Provides protection for homebuyers, sellers, conveyancers and mortgage lenders who rely on the information included in property search reports undertaken by subscribers on residential and commercial property within the United Kingdom.- Sets out minimum standards which firms compiling and selling search reports have to meet. - Promotes the best practice and quality standards within the industry for the benefit of consumers and property professionals.- Enables consumers and property professionals to have confidence in firms which subscribe to the code, their products and services.

By giving you this information, the search firm is confirming that they keep to the principles of the Code. This provides important protection for you.

The Code's core principles

Firms which subscribe to the Code will: - Display the Code logo prominently on their search reports. - Act with integrity and carry out work with due skill, care and diligence. - At all times maintain adequate and appropriate insurance to protect consumers. - Conduct business in an honest, fair and professional manner. - Handle complaints speedily and fairly. - Ensure that all search services comply with the law, registration rules and standards. - Monitor their compliance with the Code.

COMPLAINTS

If you have a query or complaint about your search, you should raise it directly with the firm, and if appropriate ask for your complaint to be considered under their formal internal complaints procedure. If you remain dissatisfied with the firm's final response after your complaint has been formally considered, or if the firm has exceeded the response timescales, you may refer your complaint for consideration under The Property Ombudsman scheme (TPOs). The Ombudsman can award compensation of up to £5,000 to you if it finds that you have suffered actual loss as a result of your search provider failing to keep to the Code.

Please note that all queries or complaints regarding your search should be directed to your search provider in the first instance, not to TPOs or to the PCCB.

TPOs Contact Details:The Property Ombudsman SchemeMilford House43-55 Milford StreetSalisburyWiltshire SP1 2BPTel: 01722 333306Fax: 01722 332296Email: [email protected]

You can get more information about the PCCB from www.propertycodes.org.uk.

PLEASE ASK YOUR SEARCH PROVIDER IF YOU WOULD LIKE A COPY OF THE SEARCH CODE

Search Code

COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE

If you want to make a complaint, we will: - Acknowledge it within 5 working days of its receipt. - Normally deal with it fully and provide a final response, in writing, within 20 working days of receipt. - Keep you informed by letter, telephone or e-mail, as you prefer, if we need more time. - Provide a final response, in writing, at the latest within 40 working days of receipt. - Liaise, at your request, with anyone acting formally on your behalf.

Complaints should be sent to:

Head of Customer RelationsLandmark Information Group LtdLandmark UK PropertyThe Smith CentreFairmileHenley-On-ThamesRG9 6AB

Telephone: 0844 844 9966

E-mail: [email protected]

Fax: 0844 844 9980

If you are not satisfied with our final response, or if we exceed the response timescales, you may refer the complaint toThe Property Ombudsman Scheme (TPOs): Tel: 01722 333306, E-mail: [email protected].

We will co-operate fully with the Ombudsman during an investigation and comply with his final decision.

Landmark Information Group Limited, 7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Exeter, EX2 7HY. © Landmark Information Group Limited.

LANDMARK CONVEYANCING TERMS & CONDITIONS

Full Terms and Conditions can be found on the following link:

http://www.landmarkinfo.co.uk/Terms/Show/432


Order Details:

Site Details:Little Plumstead Primary School, Hospital Road, Little Plumstead, Norwich,NR13 5EW

Order Number:Customer Reference:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):

41462835_1_112-0419.01 Little Plumstead Primary School630590, 310780A2.421000

Tel:Fax:Web:

0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk

Page 1 of 5 v15.0 19-Sep-2012

Geology 1:50,000 Maps Legends

MapColour

MapColour

MapColour

Lex Code

Lex Code

Lex Code

Rock Name

Rock Name

Rock Name

Rock Type

Rock Type

Rock Type

Min and Max Age

Min and Max Age

Min and Max Age

WGR

MGR

BRYD

BCHD

HPLO

LOFT

HPGL

HPGL

LDE

CRBY

CRAG

Worked Ground (Undivided)

Made Ground (Undivided)

Breydon Formation

Beach Deposits

Happisburgh Glacigenic Formation And Lowestoft

Formation (Undifferentiated)

Lowestoft Formation

Happisburgh Glacigenic Formation

Happisburgh Glacigenic Formation

Lacustrine Deposits

Crag Group and Bytham Sand and Gravel

Formation (Undifferentiated)

Crag Group

Void

Artificial Deposit

Peat

Sand and Gravel

Sand and Gravel

Diamicton

Diamicton

Sand and Gravel

Clay and Silt

Sand and Gravel

Sand and Gravel

Holocene - Holocene

Holocene - Holocene

Flandrian - Flandrian

Holocene - Holocene

Anglian - Anglian

Anglian - Anglian

Pleistocene - Pleistocene

Pleistocene - Pleistocene

Quaternary - Quaternary

Pleistocene - Pliocene

Pleistocene - Pliocene

Artificial Ground and Landslip

Superficial Geology

Bedrock and Faults

Geology 1:50,000 MapsThis report contains geological map extracts taken from the BGS Digital Geological map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale and is designed for userscarrying out preliminary site assessments who require geological maps for the area around the site. This mapping may be more up to date than previously published paper maps.The various geological layers - artificial and landslip deposits, superficial geology and solid (bedrock) geology are displayed in separate maps, but superimposed on the final 'Combined Surface Geology' map. All map legends feature on this page. Not all layers have complete nationwide coverage, so availability of data for relevant map sheets is indicated below.

Geology 1:50,000 Maps - Slice A

Map ID:Map Sheet No:Map Name:Map Date:Bedrock Geology:Superficial Geology:Artificial Geology:Faults:Landslip:Rock Segments:

1162Great Yarmouth1991AvailableAvailableAvailableNot AvailableNot AvailableNot Available

Geology 1:50,000 Maps Coverage

Order Details:




Tel:Fax:Web:


Page 2 of 5 v15.0 19-Sep-2012

Artificial Ground and LandslipArtificial ground is a term used by BGS for those areas where the ground surface has been significantly modified by human activity. Information aboutpreviously developed ground is especially important, as it is often associated with potentially contaminated material, unpredictable engineering conditions and unstable ground.

Artificial ground includes:

- Made ground - man-made deposits such as embankments and spoil heaps on the natural ground surface.- Worked ground - areas where the ground has been cut away such as quarries and road cuttings.- Infilled ground - areas where the ground has been cut away then wholly orpartially backfilled.- Landscaped ground - areas where the surface has been reshaped.- Disturbed ground - areas of ill-defined shallow or near surface mineral workings where it is impracticable to map made and worked ground separately.

Mass movement (landslip) deposits on BGS geological maps are primarily superficial deposits that have moved down slope under gravity to form landslips. These affect bedrock, other superficial deposits and artificial ground. The dataset also includes foundered strata, where the ground has collapsed due to subsidence.

Artificial Ground and Landslip Map - Slice A

Order Details:




Tel:Fax:Web:


Page 3 of 5 v15.0 19-Sep-2012

Superficial GeologySuperficial Deposits are the youngest geological deposits formed during themost recent period of geological time, the Quaternary, which extends back about 1.8 million years from the present.

They rest on older deposits or rocks referred to as Bedrock. This dataset contains Superficial deposits that are of natural origin and 'in place'. Other superficial strata may be held in the Mass Movement dataset where they have been moved, or in the Artificial Ground dataset where they are of man-made origin.

Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as gravel, sand, silt and clay, and onshore they form relatively thin, often discontinuous patches or larger spreads.

Superficial Geology Map - Slice A

Order Details:




Tel:Fax:Web:


Page 4 of 5 v15.0 19-Sep-2012

Bedrock and FaultsBedrock geology is a term used for the main mass of rocks forming the Earth and are present everywhere, whether exposed at the surface in outcrops or concealed beneath superficial deposits or water.

The bedrock has formed over vast lengths of geological time ranging from ancient and highly altered rocks of the Proterozoic, some 2500 million yearsago, or older, up to the relatively young Pliocene, 1.8 million years ago.

The bedrock geology includes many lithologies, often classified into three types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.

The BGS Faults and Rock Segments dataset includes geological faults (e.g. normal, thrust), and thin beds mapped as lines (e.g. coal seam, gypsum bed). Some of these are linked to other particular 1:50,000 Geology datasets, for example, coal seams are part of the bedrock sequence, most faults and mineral veins primarily affect the bedrock but cutacross the strata and post date its deposition.

Bedrock and Faults Map - Slice A

Order Details:




Tel:Fax:Web:


Page 5 of 5 v15.0 19-Sep-2012

Combined Surface Geology

Additional Information

Contact

The Combined Surface Geology map combines all the previous maps into one combined geological overview of your site.

Please consult the legends to the previous maps to interpret the Combined "Surface Geology" map.

More information on 1:50,000 Geological mapping and explanations of rockclassifications can be found on the BGS website. Using the LEX Codes in this report, further descriptions of rock types can be obtained by interrogating the 'BGS Lexicon of Named Rock Units'. This database can be accessed by following the 'Information and Data' link on the BGS website.

British Geological SurveyKingsley Dunham CentreKeyworthNottinghamNG12 5GGTelephone: 0115 936 3143Fax: 0115 936 3276email: [email protected]: www.bgs.ac.uk

Combined Geology Map - Slice A

Order Details

Site Details

Full Terms and Conditions can be found on the following link:

Little Plumstead Primary School, Hospital Road, Little Plumstead, Norwich, NR13 5EW


Order Number:Customer Ref:

National Grid Reference:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):

41462835_1_112-0419.01 Little Plumstead Primary School630590, 3107802.421000

Tel:Fax:Web:


Page 1 of 1A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 19-Sep-2012

Index Map

Slice

Segment

Quadrant

Client Details

For ease of identification, your site and buffer have been split into Slices, Segments and Quadrants. These are illustrated on the Index Map opposite and explained further below.

Each slice represents a 1:10,000 plot area (2.7km x 2.7km) for your site and buffer. A large site and buffer may be made up of several slices (representedby a red outline), that are referenced by letters of the alphabet, starting from the bottom left corner of the slice "grid". This grid does not relate to National Grid lines but is designed to give best fit over the site and buffer.

A segment represents a 1:2,500 plot area. Segments that have plot files associated with them are shown in dark green, others in light blue. These arenumbered from the bottom left hand corner within each slice.

A quadrant is a quarter of a segment. These are labelled as NW, NE, SW, SE and are referenced in the datasheet to allow features to be quickly locatedon plots. Therefore a feature that has a quadrant reference of A7NW will be in Slice A, Segment 7 and the NW Quadrant.

A selection of organisations who provide data within this report:

Envirocheck reports are compiled from 136 different sources of data.

Mr J Harrison, Delta Simons, 3 Chalkhill House, 19 Rosary Road, Norwich, NR1 1SZ

Appendix

II

Appendix II


Landmark Historical Map

County: NORFOLK

Published Date(s): 1888

Originally plotted at: 1:10,560

timw

Oval


Mapping: Epoch 5



timw

Oval


Mapping: Epoch 5



timw

Oval

Appendix

III

Appendix III


April 2009 Page 1 of 2

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited

The Lawn, Union Road, Lincoln LN1 3BL. Switchboard: 0870 0400 012

APPENDIX III : RISK DEFINITIONS

Consequence to Receptor Definition Matrix

Human Health Controlled Waters Buildings/Services

Severe Consequence

Acute or chronic permanent impact on

human health.

Sensitive controlled water pollution ongoing, or just about to occur.

Catastrophic collapse

Moderate Consequence

Chronic permanent impact on human health

Gradual pollution of sensitive controlled

water

Degradation of materials

Mild Consequence

Chronic temporary impact on human health

Gradual pollution of non-sensitive controlled

water

Noticeable change, non-structural

Standard Risk Matrix

Severe Consequence Moderate Consequence Mild Consequence

Higher Probability

Very High Risk

High Risk Medium Risk

Median Probability

High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk

Lower Probability

Medium Risk Low Risk Very Low Risk

April 2009 Page 2 of 2

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited

The Lawn, Union Road, Lincoln LN1 3BL. Switchboard: 0870 0400 012

Probability Definitions

Probability

Definition in Context

Higher

Positive evidence of hazard, pathway and receptor

Median

Suspect hazard, pathway, and receptor

Lower

No evidence of hazard, pathway, and receptor

Risk Rank Definitions

Rank

Definition in Context

Very High Risk

Demonstrable contaminated land situation, highest threat & liability level, urgent action recommended.

High Risk

Likely contaminated land situation, risk assessment and action recommended.

Medium Risk

Plausible contaminated land situation, risk assessment and possible action recommended.

Low Risk

Unlikely contaminated land situation, possible risk assessment and possible action.

Very Low Risk

Negligible risk, no action recommended except vigilance for changes in conditions.

Appendix

IV

Appendix IV


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

ES

ES

ES

D

D

D

D

D

MADE GROUND: Light brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY.Gravel is fine to medium angular to sub-rounded flint.

Orange brown clayey slightly gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine tomedium angular to sub-rounded flint.

Orange slightly clayey gravelly fine to medium SAND. Gravelis fine to medium angular to sub-rounded flint.

Firm brown slightly sandy CLAY.

Light brown yellow slightly clayey SAND.

Borehole complete at 3.00 m bgl.

0.40

0.80

2.50

2.80

3.00

(0.40)

(0.40)

(1.70)

(0.30)

0.10

0.30

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

No Coordinate Data AvailableNo Datum Information Available

All measurements in metresunless otherwise stated Scale: 1:31.25 Page 1 of 15m/page

NO WATER ENCOUNTERED:

NO CHISELLING

UNDERTAKEN:

CasingDepth

StandingLevel

WaterStrikeTimeDate

WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONSCHISELLINGTimeTaken

REMARKS :

1. Engineer verified logged in general accordance with BS 5930.2. Area CAT scanned prior to excavation.3. Hand pit to 1.20 m bgl.4. Borehole remained dry on completion.5. Installed with a 63 mm HDPE standpipe to 3.00 m bgl.

DepthTo

DepthFrom

BOREHOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH SEALED

DYNAMIC SAMPLER LOG

Plant Used:

Project:

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants LtdThe Lawn, Union Road,

Lincoln LN1 3BLTel: 08700 400 012Fax: 01522 882 567

Email: [email protected]

P:\GINT\NEW GINT\DELTA-SIMONS GINT DATA\LIBRARY\LIBRARY.GLB\DELTA BH 2

Premier 110Coordinates / Level (mAOD): Approved By:Checked By:

MT TW

Project No:

Date:

Logged By:

IJ

Client:

Hole ID:

DS10112-0419.01

NPS South East Ltd

Little Plumstead School

24/08/2012

REFTYPE

DEPTH(Thickness)W

AT

ER

DESCRIPTION OF STRATA LEGEND

Bac

kfill

Det

ails

Depth

Test ResultsSample Details

SPT N Value/Drive mm

CASINGDEPTH /

(Diam. mm)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

ES

ES

ES

D

D

D

D

D

MADE GROUND: Light brown sandy slightly gravelly clay.Gravel is flint and brick. Live roots.

Light brown slightly gravelly clayey fine SAND. Gravel is fineto medium angular to sub-rounded flint.

Firm light brown beige slightly gravelly sandy CLAY. Gravel isfine to medium angular to sub-rounded flint.

Orange clayey fine to medium SAND.


1.10

2.40

2.85

3.00

(1.10)

(1.30)

(0.45)

0.10

0.30

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00



Bac

kfill

Det

ails


NO CHISELLING

UNDERTAKEN:

CasingDepth

StandingLevel

WaterStrikeTimeDate


REMARKS :

1. Engineer verified logged in general accordance with BS 5930.2. Area CAT scanned prior to excavation.3. Hand pit to 1.20 m bgl.4. Borehole remained dry on completion.5. Backfilled with arisings.

DepthTo

DepthFrom


DYNAMIC SAMPLER LOG

Plant Used:

Project:






MT TW

Project No:

Date:

Logged By:

IJ

Client:

Hole ID:

DS10212-0419.01

NPS South East Ltd


24/08/2012

REFTYPE

DEPTH(Thickness)W

AT

ER


Depth



CASINGDEPTH /

(Diam. mm)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

ES

ES

ES

D

D

D

D

D

MADE GROUND: Brown slightly sandy slightly gravellyCLAY. Gravel is flint and brick.

Orange medium SAND.

Orange slightly gravelly medium SAND.

Orange yellow gravelly medium SAND. Gravel is fine tomedium angular to sub-rounded flint.


0.25

1.40

2.30

3.00

(0.25)

(1.15)

(0.90)

(0.70)

0.10

0.30

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00



Bac

kfill

Det

ails


NO CHISELLING

UNDERTAKEN:

CasingDepth

StandingLevel

WaterStrikeTimeDate


REMARKS :

1. Engineer verified logged in general accordance with BS 5930.2. Area CAT scanned prior to excavation.3. Hand pit to 1.20 m bgl.4. Borehole remained dry on completion.5. Backfilled with arisings.

DepthTo

DepthFrom


DYNAMIC SAMPLER LOG

Plant Used:

Project:






MT TW

Project No:

Date:

Logged By:

IJ

Client:

Hole ID:

DS10312-0419.01

NPS South East Ltd


24/08/2012

REFTYPE

DEPTH(Thickness)W

AT

ER


Depth



CASINGDEPTH /

(Diam. mm)

1

2

34

ES

ES

ESCBR

MADE GROUND: Brown dessicated slightly gravelly CLAY.Brick, wood and charcoal. Live roots.

Hand pit complete at 1.00 m bgl.

1.00

(1.00)

0.10

0.30

0.500.50 - 1.00



Bac

kfill

Det

ails


NO CHISELLING

UNDERTAKEN:

CasingDepth

StandingLevel

WaterStrikeTimeDate


REMARKS :

1. Engineer verified logged in general accordance with BS 5930.2. Area CAT scanned prior to excavation.3. Hand pit remained dry on completion.4. Backfilled with arisings.

DepthTo

DepthFrom


DYNAMIC SAMPLER LOG

Plant Used:

Project:






MT TW

Project No:

Date:

Logged By:

IJ

Client:

Hole ID:

HDTP10412-0419.01

NPS South East Ltd


24/08/2012

REFTYPE

DEPTH(Thickness)W

AT

ER


Depth



CASINGDEPTH /

(Diam. mm)

DYNAMIC PROBE LOG

38mm Rod Diameter50mm Cone Base Diameter750mm Standard Drop63.5kg Hammer MassBS EN ISO 22476-2:2005

Dynamic Probe Blows Vs. Depth (m)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Torque(Kg/m)

Plant Used:

Project:




P:\GINT\NEW GINT\DELTA-SIMONS GINT DATA\LIBRARY\LIBRARY.GLB\DPROBE


MT TW

Project No:

Date:

Drilled By:

IJ

Client:

Hole ID:

DPT10112-0419.01

NPS South East Ltd


24/08/2012

1.0

2.0

4.0

7.0

9.0

4

5

5

4

4

4

3

2

1

0

1

5

6

10

10

9

11

14

12

13

14

13

13

13

13

14

13

16

16

15

14

15

15

16

15

15

15

16

15

15

15

15

15

16

16

16

15

DYNAMIC PROBE LOG



Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Torque(Kg/m)

Plant Used:

Project:






MT TW

Project No:

Date:

Drilled By:

IJ

Client:

Hole ID:

DPT10212-0419.01

NPS South East Ltd


24/08/2012

1.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.5

4

5

7

7

7

8

9

3

4

6

6

7

6

4

4

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

3

2

3

DYNAMIC PROBE LOG



Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Torque(Kg/m)

Plant Used:

Project:






MT TW

Project No:

Date:

Drilled By:

IJ

Client:

Hole ID:

DPT10312-0419.01

NPS South East Ltd


24/08/2012

3

3

3

3

2

3

3

3

3

3

3

4

3

3

2

2

2

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

3

3

3

4

3

4

5

4

6

6

6

6

7

ofCo-ords (X,Y):Plant Used:Contractor:

Level (Z):

FIE

LD M

EA

SU

RE

ME

NTS

Date:Sheet:

MT

24/08/20121 1

NPS South East Ltd12-0419.01

is the cross sectional area of the borehole casing

© Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited. No part of this document may be reproduced unless prior writtenpermission has been granted.

Proforma:

Bxx

Project No:Client:Location:Project Name:

k

FH 1

H 2 is the variable head measured at time t2 after the commencement of the testis the variable head measured at time t1 after the commencement of the testis the intake factor

is the permeability of the soilGeneral Approach (after BS 5930:1999 ): Where :

Time (min) Water Depth (m) Head (m) mBorehole Depth

A

0.00 0.0011.000

0.9991.00 0.001 0.999 1.000

0.000

INP

UT

PA

RA

ME

TER

S

2.00 0.040 0.9603.00 0.050 0.9504.00 0.050 0.9505.00 0.050 0.9506.00 0.050 0.9507.00 0.060 0.9408.00 0.060 0.9409.00 0.060 0.940

10.00 0.060 0.94015.00 0.080 0.92020.00 0.090 0.91025.00 0.090 0.91030.00 0.100 0.90045.00 0.130 0.870

60 0.150 0.850m

0.0297

0.4000

Difference in Length between bottom of casing/borehole, LWater Depth

1.0000.000

0.2001.000

m

mm

m

d

0.960

m

0.031 m

2.7171

2.7171

m

0.55002.3446

mmin

min0.850

60

0.0291

2

Casing Depth

Casing Diameter, DCross sectional area of casing, AHeight of casing above ground levelApproximate long term water table

k = 4.043E-07 m/s

c = Well point or hole extended at impervious boundary

d = Well point or hole extended in uniform soil

GR

AP

H

Borehole End Condition

Intake factor, FVariable Head, H 1

Time, t 1

Variable Head, H 2

Time, t 2

a = Soil flush with bottom at impervious boundary

b= Soil flush with bottom in uniform soil

7. Log to base e worksheet function used.

e= Soil in casing with bottom at impervious boundary

f= Soil in casing with bottom in uniform soil

RE

SU

LTR

ULE

S

2. Enter all values in shaded cells: A , F , L and k are calculated automatically in the spreadsheet.

5. Likely applicable end conditions would be b or d .6. Graph plots automatically.

Little Plumstead

1. A borehole location MUST be entered to generate k .

3. Head should be measured above the long term water table.4. End conditions of borehole are referenced in BS 5930:1990 .

Location: HDTP104Borehole Permeability Test

Engineer:Status:

Little Plumstead Primary School James & MiltonHand Tools

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00

Hea

d (

m)

Time (min)

( )1

2 1 2

lo g eA Hk

F t t H=

−

Appendix

V

Appendix V


FAO Malcolm Tolley

07 September 2012

The Lawn

Union Road

Delta Simons

Lincoln

LN1 3BL

Depot Road

Newmarket

CB8 0AL

Tel: 01638 606070

Dear Malcolm Tolley

Test Report Number 212253

Your Project Reference 12-0419.01- Little Plumstead Primary School

Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 5 September 2012.

All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for

7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then

please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be

aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.

If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services

team.

Yours sincerely

Darrell Hall, Director

Notes to accompany report:• The sign < means 'less than'

• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation

• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation

• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation

• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory

• n/e means 'not evaluated'

• i/s means 'insufficient sample'

• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'

• Comments or interpretations are outside of the scope of UKAS accreditation

• The results relate only to the items tested

• Stones represent the quantity of material removed prior to analysis

• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis

• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected

to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols

• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis

• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request

• Soil descriptions, including colour and texture, are beyond the scope of MCertS accreditation

• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected

2183

Newmarket • Tamworth • Glasgow

Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL

Test Report Cover Sheet212253

LABORATORY TEST REPORT Results of analysis of 5 samples

received 29 August 2012

12-0419.01- Little Plumstead Primary School FAO

Delta Simons

Malcolm Tolley

The Lawn

Union Road

Lincoln

LN1 3BL Report Date

7 September 2012

212253 AH69869 AH69870 AH69871 AH69872 AH69873

DS102 DS102 DS103 DS103 HTDP104

ES1 ES2 ES1 D4 ES1

24/8/2012 24/8/2012 24/8/2012 24/8/2012 24/8/2012

0.10m 0.30m 0.10m 1.00m 0.10m

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

2030 Moisture % n/a 5.45 6.08 8.35 5.45 5.06 Stones content (>50mm) % n/a <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

2040 Soil colour n/a brown brown brown brown brown Soil texture n/a loam loam loam sand sand Other material n/a stones stones stones stones stones

2010 pH M 7.7 7.8 2220 Chloride (extractable) 16887006 g l-¹ M <0.010

Nitrate (extractable) 14797558 g l-¹ N <0.010 2120 Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 0.10 0.04 2420 Magnesium (soluble) 7439954 g l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 2490 Chromium (hexavalent) 18540299 mg kg-¹ N <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M 10 8.6 3.9

Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M 0.22 0.15 0.13 Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 15 9.5 7.3 Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M 0.21 <0.10 <0.10 Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M 11 15 7.1 Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 65 24 15 Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M 0.21 <0.20 <0.20 Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 72 46 29

2490 Chromium (trivalent) 7440473 mg kg-¹ N 9.7 12 8.3 2670 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ M 26 48 11 2700 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.18 < 0.1

* Units� CAS No� Determinand� SOP�

Matrix

Depth

Sample No

Sample ID

Chemtest LIMS ID

Login Batch No

Sampling Date

All tests undertaken between 05/09/2012 and 07/09/2012

* Accreditation status

This report should be interpreted in conjuction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.

Column page 1

Report page 1 of 2

LIMS sample ID range AH69869 to AH69873

LABORATORY TEST REPORT Results of analysis of 5 samples


12-0419.01- Little Plumstead Primary School FAO

Delta Simons

Malcolm Tolley

The Lawn

Union Road

Lincoln

LN1 3BL Report Date

7 September 2012

212253 AH69869 AH69870 AH69871 AH69872 AH69873

DS102 DS102 DS103 DS103 HTDP104

ES1 ES2 ES1 D4 ES1

24/8/2012 24/8/2012 24/8/2012 24/8/2012 24/8/2012

0.10m 0.30m 0.10m 1.00m 0.10m

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

2700 Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M 0.23 0.26 0.11 Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M 0.6 0.73 0.16 Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M 0.59 0.83 0.37 Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M 0.35 0.44 < 0.1 Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M 0.4 0.47 < 0.1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ M 0.33 0.47 < 0.1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ M 0.29 0.28 < 0.1 Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M 0.41 0.51 < 0.1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.11 < 0.1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M 0.39 0.51 < 0.1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M 0.51 0.51 < 0.1 Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ M 4.1 5.3 < 2

All tests undertaken between 05/09/2012 and 07/09/2012

* Accreditation status

This report should be interpreted in conjuction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.

Column page 1

Report page 2 of 2

LIMS sample ID range AH69869 to AH69873

FAO Malcolm Tolley

07 September 2012

The Lawn

Union Road

Delta Simons

Lincoln

LN1 3BL

Depot Road

Newmarket

CB8 0AL

Tel: 01638 606070

Dear Malcolm Tolley

Test Report Number 212253

Your Project Reference 12-0419.01- Little Plumstead Primary School

Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 5 September 2012.

If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services

team.

Yours sincerely

Darrell Hall, Director

2183

Notes to accompany report:

• The in-house procedure is employed to identify materials and fibres in soils

• The sample is examined by stereo-binocular and polarised light microscopy

• Sample size is reduced by coning and quartering to obtain a representative sub-sample if necessary

• The bulk identification is in accordance with the requirements of the analyst guide (HSG 248)

• Samples associated with asbestos are retained for six months

• The results relate only to the items tested as supplied by the client

• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation

Newmarket • Tamworth • Glasgow

Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL

Test Report Cover Sheet212253

LABORATORY TEST REPORT

Report Date

07 September 2012

Results of analysis of 3 samples


12-0419.01- Little Plumstead Primary SchoolFAO Malcolm Tolley

The Lawn

Union Road

Lincoln

LN1 3BL

Delta Simons

Asbestos in Soils

Login Batch No:

Chemtest ID Sample ID Sample Desc

SOP 2190

ACM Type Asbestos Identification

AH69869 ES1 DS102 0.10 - No Asbestos DetectedAH69871 ES1 DS103 0.10 - No Asbestos DetectedAH69873 ES1 HTDP104 0.10 - No Asbestos Detected

Depth (m)

212253

Qualitative Results

The detection limit for this method is 0.001%

Albert Vella

Senior Environmental Surveyor

Signed

Appendix VI


Appendix

VI

5 – 7 Hexthorpe Road, Hexthorpe, Doncaster DN4 0AR

tel: +44 (0)844 815 6641 fax: +44 (0)844 815 6642 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]

A copy of the Laboratory Schedule of accredited tests as issued by UKAS is attached to this report. This certificate is issued in accordance with the accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results reported herein relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be reproduced in full,

without the prior written approval of the laboratory.

Checked and Approved Signatories:

R Gunson A Watkins M Beastall (Director) (Director) (Laboratory Manager)

Page 1 of

LABO RATO RY REPO RT

4043

Contract Number: PSL12/2933

Client’s Reference: Report Date: 04 September 2012 Client Name: Delta Simons

The Lawn Union Road Lincoln LN1 3BL

For the attention of: Malcolm Tolley Contract Title: Little Plumstead Primary School

Date Received: 30-Aug-12 Date Commenced: 30-Aug-12 Date Completed: 4-Sep-12 Notes: Observations and Interpretations are outside the UKAS Accreditation

* Denotes test not included in laboratory scope of accreditation $ Denotes test carried out by approved contractor

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL DESCRIPTIONS

Hole Sample Sample Depth Description of Sample

Number Number Type m

DS101 4 D 1.00 Orangish brown slightly gravelly silty slightly clayey fine to medium SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded to angular flint.

DS101 7 D 2.50 Dark brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY. Gravel is fine subrounded to subangular flint.

DS101 8 D 3.00 Orangish brown slightly gravelly silty slightly clayey fine to medium SAND. Gravel is fine to medium subrounded to angular flint.

DS102 5 D 1.50 Brown very clayey silty fine to medium SAND.

DS102 7 D 2.50 Brown mottled grey gravelly very sandy CLAY. Gravel is fine to medium subrounded to angular flint.

DS102 8 D 3.00 Orangish brown very clayey silty fine to coarse SAND.

DS103 5 D 1.50 Orangish brown slightly gravelly silty slightly clayey fine to medium SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded to angular flint.

DS103 7 D 2.50 Orangish brown very gravelly slightly clayey silty fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to subrounded flint.

HDTP104 CBR B 0.50-1.00 MADE GROUND brown very gravelly clayey silty SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded to angular flint, brick and concrete.

Compiled by Date Checked by Date Approved by Date

03/09/12 04/09/12 04/09/12

Contract No:

Client Ref:LITTLE PLUMSTEAD PRIMARY SCHOOL.

PSL12/2933

12-0419.01

Page of .

SUMMARY OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTS(B.S. 1377 : PART 2 : 1990)

Moisture Bulk Dry Particle Liquid Plastic Plasticity %Hole Sample Sample Depth Content Density Density Density Limit Limit Index Passing Remarks

Number Number Type m % Mg/m3 Mg/m3 Mg/m3 % % % .425mm

Clause 3.2 Clause 7.2 Clause 7.2 Clause 8. Clause 4.3/4.4 Clause 5. Clause 6.

DS101 4 D 1.00 8.3

DS101 7 D 2.50 23 41 20 21 95

DS101 8 D 3.00 6.5

DS102 5 D 1.50 15

DS102 7 D 2.50 13 27 15 12 93

DS102 8 D 3.00 19

DS103 5 D 1.50 5.1

DS103 7 D 2.50 7.7

SYMBOLS : NP : Non Plastic * : Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit Wet Sieved.


03/09/12 04/09/12 04/09/12

PSL12/2933

12-0419.01LITTLE PLUMSTEAD PRIMARY SCHOOL.

Contract No:

Client Ref:

Intermediate plasticity CI.

Low plasticity CL.

PSLR002 Issue 1 Jun 06 Page of .

PLASTICITY CHART FOR CASAGRANDE CLASSIFICATION.(B.S.5930 : 1999)


03/09/12 04/09/12 04/09/12

PSL12/2933

12-0419.01LITTLE PLUMSTEAD PRIMARY SCHOOL.

Contract No:

Client Ref:

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Liquid Limit (LL%).

Pla

stic

ity In

de

x (P

I%).

CL CI CH CV CE

ML MI MH MV ME

PSLR002 Issue 1 Jun 06 Page of .

Hole Number: HDTP104 Depth (m):

Sample Number: Sample Type: B

Initial Sample Conditions Test Conditions Method of compaction 2.5Kg Rammer

Moisture Content: 10 Surcharge Kg: 4.20

Bulk Density Mg/m3: 2.18 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Top 10 Sample Top 67.4

Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.98 Swelling mm: 0 Sample Bottom 9.9 Sample Bottom 71.6

Percentage retained on Remarks: See Summary of Soil Description.20mm BS test sieve:

Checked by Date Approved By Date

04/09/12 04/09/12

10

LITTLE PLUMSTEAD PRIMARY SCHOOL.Contract No.PSL12/2933

Final Moisture Content % C.B.R. Value %

California Bearing Ratio Test. BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 2 4 6 8

Penetration of Plunger (mm)

Forc

e on

plu

nger

(kN

)

Top Bottom

PSLR040 Issue 1.1 Jun 09 Page of .

Appendix

VIIAppendix VII


Collation of Human Health SGVs and Soil Screening Values

Version 2.2- January 2010

Delta-Simons Human Health Generic Screening Values (HH-GSVs) based on Environment Agency (EA) Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) calculated within CLEA V.1.04

Environment Agency (EA) Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) for dioxins, furans and dioxin-

like PCBs calculated within CLEA V.1.05

LQM/CIEH Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC) 2nd Edition and Delta-Simons GAC derived using CLEA V.1.04

EIC/AGS/CL:AIRE Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk

Assessment derived using CLEA V.1.06

Withdrawn SGVs derived using CLEA UK Beta Version 1.0

Dutch Intervention Values

USEPA PRGs

References – CLEA UK Beta Modelling and Old Guidance

References – CLEA V.1.04 Modelling

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Collation of Human Health SGVs and Soil Screening Values ___________________________________________________________________________________

Delta-Simons Human Health Generic Screening Values (HH-GSVs) based on

Environment Agency (EA) Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) calculated within CLEA V.1.04

Residential (Assumes Plant Uptake) and Residential Without Plant Uptake (mg/kg) dry

weight soil

Compound

Residential (Assumes Plant Uptake) DS HH-GSV

1% SOM

Residential Without Plant Uptake DS HH-GSV

1% SOM Organic compounds

Benzene 0.18 0.27

Toluene 120 610

Ethylbenzene 65 170

Xylene – m 44 55

Xylene – o 45 60

Xylene – p 42 53

Phenol 180 310

Metals

Elemental mercury Hg 0.17 0.17

Inorganic mercury Hg2+ 170 240

Methyl mercury Hg4+ 7.4 8.4

Selenium 350 600

Inorganic Arsenic 32 35

Nickel 130 130

Cadmium 10 84

Note: The DS HH-GSVs have been derived in the same manner as the EA SGVs but for a SOM of 1 % instead of 6 %. Environment Agency (EA) Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) calculated within CLEA V.1.05

for Sum of PCDDs, PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs (µg/kg) dry weight soil

Land Use Residential

Sum of PCDDs, PCDFs and

dioxin-like PCBs 8

Notes: Based on a sandy loam soil and 6 per cent SOM.

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Collation of Human Health SGVs and Soil Screening Values ___________________________________________________________________________________ LQM/CIEH Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC) and Delta-Simons Generic Assessment

Criteria (DS GAC)

Residential (Assumes Plant Uptake) and Residential Without Plant Uptake (mg/kg) dry

weight soil

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

Compound Residential (Assumes

Plant Uptake)

Residential Without Plant Uptake

Metals DS GAC 1% SOM

DS GAC 1% SOM

Beryllium 51 51

Boron 290 10,000

Chromium (III) 3,000 3,010

Chromium (VI) 4.3 4.3

Copper 2,330 6,200

Vanadium 74 190

Zinc 3,750 40,400

Petroleum Hydrocarbons LQM/CIEH GAC

1% SOM DS GAC 1% SOM

Aliphatic EC5-EC6 30 30

Aliphatic >EC6-EC8 73 73

Aliphatic >EC8-EC10 19 19

Aliphatic >EC10-EC12 93 (48) * 93 (48) *

Aliphatic >EC12-EC16 740 (24) * 750 (24) *

Aliphatic >EC16-EC35 45,000 (8.48) * 45,000 (8.5) *

Aliphatic >EC35-EC44 45,000 (8.48) * 45,000 (8.5) *

Aromatic >EC5-EC7 65 260




Aromatic >EC12-EC16 140 1,300 (169) *

Aromatic >EC16-EC21 250 1,300



Aromatic and Aliphatic

>EC44-EC70 1,200 1,300


__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010


Plant Uptake)


PAHs LQM/CIEH GAC


Acenaphthene 210 2,000 (57) *

Acenaphthylene 170 1,950 (86) *

Anthracene 2,300 20,000 (1.2) *

Benz[a]anthracene 3.1 3.7

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.83 1.0

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 5.6 7.0

Benzo[ghi]perylene 44 47

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 8.5 10

Chrysene 6.0 8.8

Dibenz[ah]anthracene 0.76 0.87

Fluoranthene 260 970

Fluorene 160 1,850 (31) *

Indeno[123-cd]pyrene 3.2 4.2

Naphthalene 1.5 1.6

Phenanthrene 92 840 (36) *

Pyrene 560 2,400

Chloroalkanes and alkenes LQM/CIEH GAC


Vinyl Chloride (Chloroethene) 0.00047 0.00054

Trichloromethane 0.75 0.92

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.0054 0.0065

Trichloroethene 0.11 0.11

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 6.2 6.3

Tetrachloroethene 0.94 1.0

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.90 1.1

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.4 2.7

Tetrachloromethane 0.018 0.018

Explosives LQM/CIEH GAC


TNT 1.6 57

RDX 3.5 370

HMX 5.7 6,500



Plant Uptake)


Pesticides LQM/CIEH GAC


Aldrin 1.7 2.1

Dieldrin 0.69 3.5

Atrazine 0.24 31

Dichlorvos 0.29 25

Endosulfan (alpha) 2.9 44 (0.0029) *

Endosulfan (beta) 2.8 53 (0.000067) *

Hexachlorocyclohexane

(alpha) 19 17


(beta) 1.7 50


(gamma) 0.58 19

Chlorobenzenes LQM/CIEH GAC


Chlorobenzene 0.33 0.33

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 16 17

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.29 0.31

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 30 42

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 1.1



1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 12 17

1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 0.49 0.53

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 0.3 0.52

Pentachlorobenzene 5.2 14

Hexachlorobenzene 0.59 (0.20) * 1.2 (0.2) *

Chlorophenols LQM/CIEH GAC


Chlorophenols (except

Pentachlorophenol) 0.87 58

Pentachlorophenol 0.55 22

Other LQM/CIEH GAC


Carbon Disulphide 0.10 0.10

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.21 0.22

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

Notes: * Soil or vapour Saturation limit presented in brackets


EIC/AGS/CL:AIRE Generic Assessment Criteria

Residential with consumption of homegrown produce and

Residential without consumption of homegrown produce (mg/kg)

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

Compound Residential with consumption of

homegrown produce

Residential Without consumption of

homegrown produce

Metals EIC GAC 1% SOM

EIC GAC 1% SOM

Antimony ND 550

Barium ND 1,300

Molybdenum ND 670

Organics EIC GAC 1% SOM

EIC GAC 1% SOM

1,1,2 Trichloroethane 0.6 0.88

1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 2.5

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.23 0.23

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.35 0.41

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.024 0.024

2,4-Dimethylphenol 19 210

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 1.5 170 (141) *

2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.78 78

2-Chloronaphthalene 3.7 3.8

Biphenyl 66 (34.4) * 220 (34.4) *

Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 280 (8.68) * 2,700 (8.68) *

Bromobenzene 0.87 0.91

Bromodichloromethane 0.016 5.2

Bromoform 2.8 0.019

Butyl benzyl phthalate 1,400 (26.3) * 42,000 (26.3) *

Chloroethane 8.3 8.4

Chloromethane 0.0083 0.0085

Cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 0.11 0.12

Dichloromethane 0.58 2.1

Diethyl phthalate 120 (13.7) * 1,800 (13.7) *

Di-n-butyl phthalate 13 (4.65) * 450 (4.65) *

Di-n-octyl phthalate 2,300 (32.6) * 3,400 (32.6) *

Hexachloroethane 0.2 0.22

Iso-propylbenzene 11 12

Methyl tert-butyl ether 49 73


Compound Residential with consumption of

homegrown produce

Residential Without consumption of

homegrown produce

Propylbenzene 34 40

Styrene 8.1 35

Total Cresols (2-, 3- and 4-

methylphenol) 80 3,700

Trans 1,2-dichloroethene 0.19 0.19

Tributyl tin oxide 0.25 1.4

Notes: * GAC exceed soil saturation concentration (given in brackets). Soil concentrations above the soil saturation may indicate that NAPL is present. Risks from NAPL may need to be considered separately.

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

ND – Not derived. It was considered beyond the scope of the project to collate and review plant concentration factors for the metals and therefore GAC have only been produced for land-uses that do not involve plant uptake.


Withdrawn CLEA Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) derived using CLEA UK Beta

Compound Residential with plant uptake (mg/kg)

dry weight soil

Residential without plant uptake

(mg/kg) dry weight soil Inorganic compounds

Arsenic 20 20

Cadmium (pH6) 1

(pH7) 2

(pH8) 8

30

Chromium 130 200

Lead 450 450

Mercury 8 15

Nickel 50 75

Selenium 35 35

Organic compounds

Ethylbenzene 9# 16#

Toluene 3# 3#

Phenol 78# 21,900#

Notes: # Based on 1 % soil organic matter, which is the most conservative scenario of those presented within the appropriate SGV document. Ethylbenzene Residential without Plant Uptake SGV updated April 2005.

ICRCL Values for Copper and Zinc (use LQM/CIEH GACs for Human Health)

Compound ICRCL (mg/kg)

Copper 130

Zinc 300

Notes: It is noted that at elevated copper and zinc concentrations, phytotoxicity might start to limit vegetable growth and may become a major cause of concern. In these circumstances the ICRCL limit of 130 mg/kg for copper, and the ICRCL Tentative ‘Trigger concentration’ of 300 mg/kg for zinc might need to be considered as suitable generic assessment criterias in order to be protective of plant growth.

Dutch Intervention Values

Compound Dutch Intervention Value

(mg/kg) dry matter

Cobalt 240

Free cyanide 20

(pH <5) 650 Complex cyanide

(pH >5) 50

Notes: The soil remediation Intervention Values indicate when the functional properties of the soil for humans, plant and animal life, is seriously impaired or threatened. They are representative of the level of contamination above which there is a serious case of soil contamination (Dutch Circular). Values for soil/sediment have been expressed as the concentration in a standard soil assumed to be 10% organic matter and 25 % clay.

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010


USEPA PRGs 2004

Compound Residential Soil (mg/kg)

Industrial Soil (mg/kg)

Manganese and compounds 1,800 19,000

Ammonium sulphate 12,000 100,000

Notes: The USEPA Preliminary Remediation Goals are guideline values to be used for Site screening. Ammonium sulphamate has been used by Delta-Simons as a proxy for Ammonium.

References – CLEA V.1.04, V.1.05 and V.1.06 Modelling

EIC/AGS/CL:AIRE (2010), Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment. Environment Industries Commission (EIC), Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS), Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE). Published by CL:AIRE. ISBN: 978-1-905046-20-1. Environment Agency (2008), Science Report – SC050021/SR7: Compilation of Data for Priority Organic Pollutants for Derivation of Soil Guideline Values, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84432-964-9. Environment Agency (2009a), Science Report – SC050021/SR2:Human Health Toxicological Assessment of Contaminants in Soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84432-858-1. Environment Agency (2009b), Science Report – SC050021/SR3:Updated Technical Background to the CLEA Model, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84432-856-7. Environment Agency (2009c), Science Report – SC050021/SR4: CLEA Software (Version 1.04) Handbook, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84432-857-4. Environment Agency (2009d), Science Report – SC050021/SR4: CLEA Software (Version 1.05) Handbook, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-105-8. Sept 2009. Nathanail, C.P., McCaffrey,C., Ashmore,M.H., Cheng, Y.Y., Gillett, A., Ogden,R. & Scott,D. (2009). The LQM/CIEH Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment (2nd Edition). Land Quality Press, Nottingham. ISBN: 0-9547474-7-X. LQM/CIEH. (4/11/09). The LQM/CIEH Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment (2nd Edition). Frequently Asked Questions. Version 1.4. www.lqm.co.uk. New SGV Reports Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/benzene SGV: Soil Guideline Values for benzene in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/toluene SGV: Soil Guideline Values for toluene in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/ethylbenzene SGV: Soil Guideline Values for ethylbenzene in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/xylene SGV: Soil Guideline Values for xylene in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). March 2009.

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Collation of Human Health SGVs and Soil Screening Values ___________________________________________________________________________________ Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/mercury SGV: Soil Guideline Values for mercury in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/selenium SGV: Soil Guideline Values for selenium in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/arsenic SGV: Soil Guideline Values for inorganic arsenic in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). May 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/nickel SGV: Soil Guideline Values for nickel in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/cadmium SGV: Soil Guideline Values for cadmium in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). June 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/phenol SGV: Soil Guideline Values for phenol in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). June 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs SGV: Soil Guideline Values for dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs in soil, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). September 2009. New TOX Reports Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/benzene TOX: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-023-5. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/toluene TOX: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-024-2. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/ethylbenzene TOX: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-025-9. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/xylene TOX: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-026-6. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/mercury TOX: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-021-1. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/selenium TOX: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-022-8. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/inorganic arsenic TOX1: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-043-3. May 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/nickel TOX8: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-046-4. May 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/cadmium TOX3: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-076-1. July 2009.

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Collation of Human Health SGVs and Soil Screening Values ___________________________________________________________________________________ Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/phenol TOX9: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-075-4. July 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs TOX12: Contaminants in soil: updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-108-9. September 2009. New Supplementary Information Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/SGV Introduction: Using Soil Guideline Values, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-037-2. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review benzene:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for benzene, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-011-2. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review toluene:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for toluene, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-012-9. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review ethylbenzene:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for ethylbenzene, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-013-6. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review xylene:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for xylene, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-014-3. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review mercury:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for mercury, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-009-9. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review selenium:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for selenium, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-010-5. March 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review arsenic:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for arsenic, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-044-0. May 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review nickel Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for nickel, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-047-1. May 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review cadmium:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for cadmium, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-072-3. July 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review phenoi:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for phenol, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-071-6. July 2009. Environment Agency (2009), Science Report – SC050021/Technical review dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs:Supplementary information for the derivation of SGV for dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs, Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 978-1-84911-109-6. September 2009.

References – CLEA UK Beta Modelling and Old Guidance

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

CLR10 – The Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) Model: Technical Basis and Algorithms. R&D Publication CLR10. (DEFRA/EA 2002).

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Collation of Human Health SGVs and Soil Screening Values ___________________________________________________________________________________ DEFRA -Contaminants in Soil: Collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency. Environment agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD. Benzo[a]pyrene published April 2002 R& D; Publication – Tox 2; Benzene published April 2003 and R& D Publication – Tox 11; Dioxins, Furans and dioxin-like PCBs published April 2003 R&D Publication –Tox 12; Phenol published October 2003 and R&D Publication –Tox 9; Naphthalene published December 2003 and R& D Publication – Tox 20; Ethylbenzene published March 2004 and R& D Publication – Tox 17; Toluene published March 2004 and R& D Publication – Tox 14; Vinyl chloride published June 2004 and R&D Publication Tox 18; 1,1,2,2 Tetrachloroethane and 1,1,1,2 Tetrachloroethane published June 2004 and R&D Publication Tox 16; 1,1,1 Trichloroethane published June 2004 and R&D Publication Tox 25; Tetrachloroethene published June 2004 and R&D Publication Tox 23; 1,2-Dichloroethane published August 2004 and R&D Publication Tox 22; Trichloroethene published October 2004 and R&D Publication –Tox 24; and Xylene published November 2004 and R&D Publication Tox 19. DUTCH - Dutch indicates Lijzen, J.P.A, Baars, A. J., Otte, P.F., Rikken, M.G.J, Swartjes, F.A, Verbruggen, E. M.J., Van Wezel, A. P (February 2001) RIVM report 711701 023, Technical evaluation of the Intervention Values for soil/sediment and Groundwater. Human and ecotoxicological risk assessment and derivation of risk limits for soil, aquatic sediment and groundwater. RIVM, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven. Dutch Circular – Target values, soil remediation invervention values and indicative levels for serious contamination, February 2000 (Circular) RIVM. Environment Agency (2005). CLEA UK Handbook (Draft). Support Document for the CLEA UK Software Beta Version 1.0. Environment Agency (Bristol, UK). ISBN: 1844325016. GAC manual – Nathanail, C.P., McCaffrey, C., Ashmore, M., Cheng, Y., Gillett, A.G., Hooker, P.J. & Ogden, R. (2007). Generic assessment criteria for human health risk assessment. Land Quality Press, Nottingham, Uk. ISBN: 0 9547474 3 7. ICRCL - Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land. Guidance Note 59/83, 2nd edition, July 1987. PRG. USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. PRG Preliminary Remediation Goals Region 9 Table 2004. http://www.epa.gov/Region9/waste/sfund/prg/files/04prgtable.pdf

__________________________________________________________________________ Version 2.2 January 2010

http://www.epa.gov/Region9/waste/sfund/prg/files/04prgtable.pdf

Documents

SUMMARY SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT LITTLE PLUMSTEAD …