Study of Fraternity and Sorority Recruitment Process Timeline Fall 1996: Deferred Recruitment Report, Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs

- The Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs was charged by Chancellor Hooker in 1996 to study the concept of DEFERRED RUSH.

- The committee consisted of students, alumni, faculty, administration, house directors, Chapel Hill Police and Fire Departments, and Student Legal Services.

- They recommended to the Chancellor NOT to defer rush for many reasons, however the study brought to light a number of related issues that negatively impacted rush, alcohol use and the intellectual climate.

November 15, 2001: Board of Trustees Meeting

- Melissa Exum, Dean of Students, presented results of the CORE survey o According to the statistics, not only did non-Greek students feel alcohol is central

to fraternity and sorority life, an even higher percentage of GREEK students admitted that it is.

- BOT requested an update on Greek Affairs, specifically answering the question, “Should UNC consider deferred rush?”

- BOT asked that the Student Affairs Committee of the Board continue further discussions with Greek Affairs on the deferred rush issue

January 2002: Student Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees

- IFC President, Matt O’Brien, answered questions posed by the committee and the Chancellor

- Committee showed overwhelming support for the fraternity and sorority community, but cited the need for greater self-governance and more mature adult supervision

o Specifically, the Chancellor supported the idea of required live-in house directors or more active senior advisors for all Greek houses.

- BOT chairman, Tim Burnett, posed the question, “Is it a privilege for a fraternity/sorority to be at UNC and, if so, what is the price to pay to exist?”

January 2002: IFC Alumni Advisors Committee Forms

- As a result of the meetings with the Student Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees, Jim Gray, UNC ’70 and DKE alumnus, began to form an IFC alumni group.

- The committee divided itself into five subcommittees: rush, marketing, hazing, fire safety and house safety.

March 27, 2002: Student Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees

- The BOT requested that the IFC and Panhellenic Presidents give a presentation on the state of their organizations and how they plan on improving in the areas of recruitment, programming, and community relations.

- The student leaders presented an action plan which included increased alumni and parents involvement as well as increased University relations through an active review of the hazing and alcohol policies.

November 2002: IFC Rush Subcommittee of the Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs - Committee consisted of faculty, IFC students, parents, alumni, staff and Jean Kitchin

(BOT) - The major charge of the committee was to completely review the IFC Recruitment

process, specifically o Pre-Recruitment (marketing, CTOPS sessions, media and parents outreach) o Recruitment (structure, length, timing, events, enforcement) o Post-Recruitment (new member education, hazing)

February 24, 2003: Subcommittee Report to the Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs

- The report decided against deferring recruitment, but rather recommended a longer recruitment period with a one-week delay, and no events scheduled Sundays through Wednesdays.

- Also, the publication of an IFC recruitment booklet, establishment of an enforcement team, creation of an “open house” program at the beginning of recruitment and required registration to receive a bid, and the creation of the IFC Code of Conduct were all results of this committee.

March 2003: University Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees

- Findings from the newly adopted IFC recruitment plan and Code of Conduct were presented to the Board of Trustees. They endorsed the findings and requested a full report of the results.

July 2003: University Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees

- The BOT requested an update on the progress of the implementation of the new IFC Recruitment Plan from the Director of Greek Affairs.

October 30, 2003: Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs

- The committee debriefed about the IFC Rush process. - IFC Rush Subcommittee charged with suggesting any changes to the new IFC Rush plan

for Spring 2004. November 20, 2004: Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs

- IFC Rush Subcommittee reports a few modifications and shortening of the recruitment schedule. The rationale was that all students interested in joining a fraternity have already been at Carolina for a minimum of one semester (i.e., adjustment to campus was not an argument).

January 2004: Board of Trustees meeting

- The BOT publicly announces concerns of hazing and review of deferred recruitment once again. They charge the Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs to provide reasons why deferred recruitment would and would not work at Carolina as well as what steps need to be taken to prevent hazing in the fraternity and sorority community.

January 30, 2004: Task Force on Personal Servitude and Deferred Recruitment - The charge of the subcommittee was (1) to study the concerns of hazing with a focus on

“personal servitude”; and (2) study the implications of deferring recruitment to Spring semester in preparation of a report to the BOT in March 2004.

- This charge was sparked by BOT members received calls and hearing stories of hazing in the fraternities.

- BOT believed deferred rush = stronger academics; better lifestyle adjustment and avoidance of strong social pulls in negative direction.

- Subcommittee studied academic averages of first-year pledges over 5 years as well as deferred recruitment at peer institutions.

March 24, 2004: Presentation to the University Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees

- Director of Greek Affairs Anhorn and AVC Wolf Johnson spoke on identified problems and recommendations on alumni involvement, enforcement of IFC Code of Conduct, academic requirements, anonymous reporting structures and overall education of new and active members.

- Council presidents presented on the pros and cons of deferred recruitment - BOT embraced changes but stated they would keep an eye on the progress

September 2004: University Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees

- IFC President and Director of Greek Affairs report the recruitment results, statistics and violations and the progress of enforcement of IFC Code of Conduct

October 2004: Board of Visitors requests an update on Greek issues

- Director of Greek Affairs reports the recruitment results in addition to judicial programs and enforcement updates.

Author: Chancellors Committee on Fraternity and Sorority Life

Fall 1996

1

Chancellor's Committee on Greek Affairs Deferred Recruitment Study - Fall 1996

During the summer of 1996, the Chancellor's Committee on Greek Affairs was charged with studying deferred rush and making a recommendation by the end of Fall Semester 1996. This report constitutes the Chancellor's Committee's recommendation. The Chancellor's Committee on Greek Affairs began the study with four goals:

1. To comprehensively study the issue 2. To maximize input, particularly by students 3. To "do our homework" by producing a quality study 4. To keep an open mind as to the study outcome.

To study the issue comprehensively, seven sub-committees were established to examine each component of deferred rush. The sub-committees are:

1. Definitions (how is deferred rush defined) 2. Enforcement (how would deferred rush be enforced) 3. Data (what data is needed to study this issue) 4. Survey (who should be surveyed) 5. Historical Perspective (what did deferred rush look like at UNC) 6. Finances (how will deferred rush affect finances) 7. Alternatives (what are some alternatives to deferred rush)

To maximize input, the list of sub-committees and their chairs was sent to all fraternity and sorority presidents & advisors, was distributed at IFC, Panhellenic and NPHC meetings, and was part of a letter to editor to The Daily Tarheel. Each sub-committee thoroughly studied their area, with countless hours spent researching each aspect of deferred rush. The monthly Chancellor's Committee meetings were used to review each sub-committee's progress and to seek further input from those in attendance. Attendance at these meetings was standing room only including coverage by the media. The amount of input, especially by students, was excellent. After long and careful study, the committee recommended the following: PART ONE That UNC not go to deferred rush for the following reasons:

1. Deferred rush creates a semester long, underground, uncontrolled rush that hinders the intellectual climate. Peer institutions with deferred rush support this finding.

2. Students much prefer a two week period of controlled rush to 15 weeks of uncontrolled rush. 3. To be effective, deferred rush requires two university rules: student groups may not pledge first-

term freshmen, and no first-term freshmen may join student groups. Both rules would be difficult to adopt and to defend legally.

4. Deferred rush requires a "strict silence" system where no members may speak to potential new members prior to rush; a system running counter to integrating new students to the campus (2,600 student members being prohibited from speaking to 3,200 first-term freshmen is problematic).

5. No national fraternity or sorority supports deferred rush. 6. Considerable speculation exists that a legal challenge would be mounted if UNC adopted deferred

rush (first amendment freedom of association).

Author: Chancellors Committee on Fraternity and Sorority Life

Fall 1996

2

7. Groups would suffer considerable financial difficulty with deferred rush, particularly with the recent sprinkler system requirement.

8. The data does not support the argument that Fall term pledging negatively affects achievement or retention.

9. The data shows a considerable, and growing, portion of first-term freshmen delaying their decision to join a Greek group. Students are the best judges as to when to join a Greek group.

10. UNC's experience with deferred rush points toward the difficulty in making such a system work.

PART TWO As the committee studied deferred rush a number of related issues arose that negatively impact rush, alcohol abuse and the intellectual climate. The committee studied these issues and after careful consideration strongly recommends that UNC take the following action:

1. The interim reforms adopted this summer (1996) have proven to be quite effective and therefore are to be extended indefinitely. These include:

a. IFC and Panhellenic rush occur no longer than the first two weeks or school b. That IFC cap chapter rush expenses at $5,000/semester (similar to Panhellenic limit of

$3,000) c. That all rush functions be totally free of alcohol by everyone attending the function. d. That pledges attend an alcohol & drug abuse seminar (in addition to the already required

seminars on risk management & fire safety and date rape prevention). 2. IFC and Panhellenic Fall rush to coincide and conclude on the same day. 3. Alleged violations of dry rush be referred to the Greek Judicial Board. 4. IFC to present a plan for structured rush to include open house dates for potential rushees, no

parties, and no alcohol to begin Fall 1997. 5. UNC is to seek alternative social outlets for students who have previously used fraternity rush

events as social outlets. 6. By Fall Semester 2000, all fraternities and sororities shall achieve a 2.5 chapter GPA. 7. By Fall Semester 2000, all pledges shall be fully initiated no later than 8 weeks after rush. 8. Fraternities and sororities shall conduct mandatory study hours for new members. 9. IFC, Panhellenic and NPHC shall produce a major program or lecture series annually, open to the

campus, that improves the intellectual climate.

PART THREE That the Chancellor's Committee on Greek Affairs be charged with developing a comprehensive strategic plan for fraternities and sororities by the end of Spring Semester 1997. This plan shall include but not limited to the following:

1. Identifying the various components of the Greek Community (scholarship, leadership, services, alumni involvement, etc.).

2. Assessing where each component is currently. 3. Determine what each component should ideally be achieving. 4. Determine how each component can achieve its ideal including what services UNC should be

providing fraternities and sororities.

UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees Minutes - November 15, 2001

6

Mr. Stevens indicated his agreement with the above comments and also commented

that since the Board's meeting in September, the Town of Chapel Hill approved by an eight-

point vote the University's request for a zoning application to University property. He

recommended that a formal acknowledgement be sent from the University to the Town

thanking them for the approval of the zoning application.

Budget Update The Budget Status Report for First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002, July 1, 2001 through

September 30, 2001, was presented for information only. No formal action was required.

(ATTACHMENT N)

STUDENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

Ms. Kitchin, chair of the Student Affairs Committee, introduced the agenda to the

Board.

Student Life Update Sue Kitchen, vice chancellor for Student Affairs, introduced Melissa Exum, dean of

students, who presented an alcohol update to the Board. Dean Exum reported on the

Highway Safety Research "2 out of 3" Study; the reported alcohol incidents and types of

incidents; the sanctions imposed; and CORE data concerning student self-reporting. [A

copy of Dean Exum's presentation data is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

Mr. Jay Anhorn, director of Greek Affairs, presented an update on Greek life at the

University. The presentation included the University's policy concerning fraternity and

sorority rush activities; the University's fraternity and sorority alcohol policy; and the

University's hazing policy, which applies to individuals and organizations. [A copy of Mr.

Anhorn's presentation data is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

Following Mr. Anhorn's presentation, there was discussion concerning the matter of

alumni involvement in fraternities.

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Mr. Stevens, chair of the Academic Affairs and Personnel Committee, introduced the

agenda to the Board.

Update on Campus-Based Tuition Increases Robert Shelton, executive vice chancellor and provost, presented information

concerning campus-based tuition at the University. [A copy of Dr. Shelton's presentation

data is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

Following his presentation, Dr. Shelton commented that this issue needs to be

examined every year, not necessarily with the idea of raising tuition, but so there is a regular

review and is being handled in a concerted, considered systematic manner. It's too

important a topic to let it slide year after year without review.

Chancellor Moeser commented that system schools need to synchronize and co-

ordinate whatever the UNC System is going to do for an across-the-board tuition increase

that would affect the whole UNC System that would be passed along by the Board of

Governors. The system schools should be given the guidelines in advance in case the

school wanted to do a campus-based initiative built on the platform of whatever the system

does. This matter was discussed during a previous Board of Governors meeting, which was

attended by the UNC System President and the campus chancellors. The majority of

opinion, ultimately subscribed to by the President, was a modest, very small system-wide

UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees Minutes - January 24, 2002

4

STUDENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Ms. Kitchin, chair of the Student Affairs Committee, reported on the committee's

meeting that was held on January 23.

The committee heard comments from representatives of the Inter-Fraternity Council

(IFC), Panhellenic Council, and National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), house parents Don

and Sharon Gaddo, staff members from Student Affairs, Greek Affairs, and Judicial Affairs.

The committee heard a report concerning the Chancellor's Committee on Greek

Affairs, which is building a consensus on the standards for University recognition for

individual Greek chapters. Also discussed were issues related to conduct, alcohol and

drugs, and hazing.

DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Development Update Mr. Fulton, chair of the Development Committee, presented a report regarding the

level of activity and current contributions in the Office of University Advancement.

He stated that the public kickoff for the Carolina First Campaign would be held on

April 26, 2002.

AUDIT, BUSINESS AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Mr. Hynes, chair of the Audit, Business and Finance Committee, introduced Mr. Max

Chapman.

Report from the Chair of The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Foundation Investment Fund, Inc. Mr. Chapman presented a report to the Board concerning the performance of the

University's Foundation Investment Fund, Inc. Mr. Chapman's presentation was interrupted

in order to convene the Academic Affairs and Personnel Committee.

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Mr. Stevens, chair of the Academic Affairs and Personnel Committee, introduced the

agenda to the Board.

Tuition Study Robert Shelton, executive vice chancellor and provost, presented the Report of the

Task Force on Tuition concerning a proposed tuition increase.

(ATTACHMENT M)

The majority (eleven in favor and four opposed) of the Task Force endorsed a

recommendation to the Board for a one-year, $400/year permanent campus-based tuition

increase, effective fall semester of academic year 2002-2003. The Task Force

acknowledged the necessity of developing a multi-year plan to present to the Board of

Trustees for future consideration.

Trustee Justin Young presented a report from the Coalition for Responsible Tuition

Decisions concerning the development and implementation of tuition increases. [A copy of

the report is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

Ms. Mikisha Brown, president of the Graduate and Professional Student Federation,

presented the graduate and professional students' perspective on the proposed tuition

increase.

UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees Minutes - March 28, 2002

7

University Police Chief Derek Poarch commented on campus safety, as well as

the proposed night parking plan and its possible effects on the campus.

Mr. Stevens moved that the plan be sent back to the Chancellor for further review

and asked that a recommendation be presented to the Board at its May meeting, or

sooner, without a night parking employee and student fee included. Ms. Kitchin and Mr.

Young seconded the motion. Mr. Pardue stated that he did not support the motion. The

following Trustees voted in favor of the motion: Mr. Carter, Ms. Kitchin, Mr. Stallings, Mr.

Stevens, Mr. Williams, and Mr. Young. The motion carried. A further poll of the Trustees

was not taken.

(ATTACHMENT V)

STUDENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

Ms. Kitchin, chair of the Student Affairs Committee, reported on the committee's

meeting that was held on March 27.

There was discussion at the committee meeting concerning whether a

requirement should be imposed for adult supervision among the Greek groups,

specifically the fraternities, or whether they would do it on their own. Ms. Kitchin stated

that tremendously positive progress has been made in a mature embracement of that

responsibility with the guidance of the Student Affairs Administration.

The committee heard comments from members of the Student Affairs

Administration, Greek Council student leaders, and several alumni advisors.

Ms. Kitchin introduced and recognized Ms. Rebecca Williford, student body

secretary-elect.

Vice Chancellor Sue Kitchen, Student Affairs, described a First Destination

Survey of May 2001 Bachelor's Degree Recipients of the University, which is published

by University Career Services. The survey is prepared annually and shows information

such as graduates' employment status, salary, further education, job satisfaction, and

location. [A copy of the survey is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE

Mr. Stevens, chair of the Academic Affairs and Personnel Committee, introduced

the agenda to the Board.

Facilities and Administrative Funds - Status Report Robert Shelton, executive vice chancellor and provost, reported that facilities and

administrative funds are critical to Carolina's future as a research university. He then

introduced Tony Waldrop, vice chancellor for Research and Graduate Studies, for the

presentation. [A copy of the presentation is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Development Update Mr. Fulton, chair of the Development Committee, presented a report regarding the

level of activity and current contributions in the Office of University Advancement. He

stated that the public announcement for the goal of the Carolina First Campaign has now

been deferred to University Day, October 12, 2002.

UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees Minutes – November 20-21, 2002

6

For over 200 years, students have determined the standards to which they want to be held, and even today we firmly believe that student self-governance—the ability to have a collective standard and to be judged by one’s peers—is one of the University’s most precious assets. We have a rich history, not simply of student involvement, but of genuine student leadership in its truest sense—taking ownership of our campus, making decisions that enable us to improve ourselves and our community, working to steer Carolina towards something better.”

REPORT OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE Mr. Schwab, chair of the Finance Committee, presented the committee’s report on the

following consent agenda items, which were previously approved by the committee.

• Endowment Fund Annual Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2002. The report will be transmitted to the Board of Governors.

(ATTACHMENT O)

• Change in use of the Cassas Endowment Fund (ATTACHMENT P)

Mr. Schwab moved ratification by the Board of the above consent agenda items. Ms.

Mason seconded the motion and it carried.

The following items were presented previously to the committee for information only (no

formal action was required).

• Report of Investment Funds by Max Chapman, chairman, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Foundation Investment Fund, Inc.

• Overview of the University Financial Structure (including the UNC System

Enrollment Funding Model and a brief introduction to the new G.A.S.B. financial statement formats, including new terminology used to describe the University’s financial position) by Vice Chancellor Nancy Suttenfield, Finance and Administration

(ATTACHMENT Q)

• Budget Status Report for First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2003 by Vice Chancellor Suttenfield

(ATTACHMENT R)

Mr. Fulton updated the Board on the progress of the Carolina First Campaign. Some of

the things accomplished by the campaign so far include the commitment of 93 professorships,

115 endowed undergraduate scholarships, 60 expendable undergraduate scholarships, 68

endowed graduate fellowships, and 28 expendable graduate fellowships; and most recognizable

is Hyde Hall, the new home to the Institute for the Arts and Humanities.

REPORT OF THE UNIVERSITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Mr. Carter, chair of the University Affairs Committee, commented on a previous meeting

attended by some members of the University Affairs Committee (Trustees Carson, Carter, and

Kitchin) and members of the Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs. Cindy Wolf-Johnson

and Dean Bresciani assembled the meeting. Ms. Daum also attended the meeting.

The group discussed issues of concern within the Greek Community in terms of rush,

boarded-up houses, and alumni involvement. There are also a lot of positive things occurring in

the Greek Community in terms of investment, remodeling and renovations of historic buildings

on campus.

Mr. Carter stated that the committee was primarily trying to get a direction from the

group as to what they are working on so the University Affairs Committee can work in

conjunction with the Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs and the Office of Student Affairs

to bring some issues to resolution and conclusion that may have been studied and evaluated for

a number of years. The group is also trying to create an environment separating student

UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees Minutes – November 20-21, 2002

7

conduct issues from previous years and work on specific structural elements that pertain to

Greek Life that possibly some reform and/or evaluation can be adopted.

Mr. Carter commented that the group will be meeting on a regular basis and is well

represented by a number of groups that have involvement in the Greek Community and it is

anticipated that there will be a number of action items to come before the University Affairs

Committee in the early Spring.

Mr. Carter stated that the committee had issued an invitation to the Faculty Chair to join

the University Affairs Committee at the meeting table. He advised Faculty Chair Sue Estroff

about this and she was extremely receptive. She was unable to attend this committee meeting

due to a previous commitment.

Mr. Carter presented the committee’s report on the following items, which were

presented previously to the committee for information only (no formal action was required).

• Increasing Graduate Enrollment: Strategies for Recruitment, Retention and Increased Support by Dean Linda Dykstra, Graduate School.

• Open Discussion with the Academic Leadership by Executive Vice Chancellor

and Provost Robert Shelton

Chairman Burnett asked when the Salary and Gender Equity Report would be presented

to the Board. Dr. Shelton responded that due to the extensive amount of work remaining to be

done on the report, it would be Spring 2003 when the report will be ready for presentation to the

Board.

Chairman Burnett also inquired concerning when there would be definitive decisions

made on the issues being considered by the Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs. Mr.

Carter responded that during the next two to three months the Chancellor’s Committee on

Greek Affairs and the University Affairs Committee will be engaged in discussions and it is

hoped there will be a report brought to the Board in the spring of 2003.

Ms. Kitchin stated that she would be serving as the Board of Trustees liaison to the

Chancellor’s Committee on Greek Affairs.

MEASURES OF EXCELLENCE

The first draft of the Measures of Excellence was presented to the Board for

consideration at its September 26, 2002 meeting at which time the Board made comments and

suggestions to the measures.

Dr. Shelton presented the following version of the Measures of Excellence, a copy of

which was distributed to the Board. [A copy of the Measures of Excellence is filed in the Office

of the Assistant Secretary.]

I. UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION • Proportion of courses with under 20 enrollment • Financial Accessibility

o Merit scholarships, including National Merits o Need-based scholarships (percentage of need)

• Freshmen retention rates • Four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates • Student experience: quality of teaching and advising; level of engagement

(NSSE/CSEQ) • Rate of student participation in enrichment programs (e.g., research,

independent studies, internships, honors) • Distinguished scholarship recipients (e.g., Rhodes, Marshall, Fulbright)

UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees Minutes – March 27, 2003

7

Mike Overlock has joined Mr. Fulton and Charles M. Shaffer, Jr. as a co-chair of the Campaign.

REPORT OF THE UNIVERSITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

Mr. Carter, chair of the University Affairs Committee, presented the committee’s report

on the following items, which were presented previously to the committee for information only

(no formal action was requested at that time).

• Faculty Chair Sue Estroff commented on the concern of the faculty over the potential decline of health care benefits as part of the benefit package to the faculty with deductibles and co-pays tending to decline

• Academic Plan Progress Report by Robert Shelton, executive vice chancellor

and provost. [A copy of the presentation is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

Chairman Carter stated that a final Academic Plan will be presented to the Board for approval at the May meeting.

• Report of the Tuition Remission Task Force dated February 10, 2003 by Linda

Dykstra, dean, Graduate School, and task force chair. [A copy of the report is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

• Salary Equity Study Status Report by Bernadette Gray-Little, executive associate

provost, Office of Provost, Academic Affairs

Dr. Gray-Little stated that a final Salary Equity Study Report will be presented to the Board in May or July.

• Athletics Department Report by Athletic Director Dick Baddour. Mr. Baddour

reported to the Board that the following former UNC athletes had received an NCAA award:

• Shalane Flanagan, Erin Donohue, Anissa Gainey, and Alice

Schmidt—distance event • Laura Gerraughty—shot-put event • 6 students were selected for ACC and NCAA post graduate

school scholarships

• Fraternity Rush Recommendations by Dean Bresciani, interim vice chancellor for Student Affairs

(ATTACHMENT T) • Committee on Student Conduct (COSC)/Student Judicial Process by Professor

Judith Wegner, School of Law, and Chair of the Committee on Student Conduct; and Jonathan Slain, Student Attorney General (2003-2004), and a member of the Committee on Student Conduct. [A copy of the presentation material is filed in the Office of the Assistant Secretary.]

Further information concerning the Board’s endorsement of the student judicial process will be presented to the Board at the May meeting.

• Carolina North Planning Process by Mark Crowell, associate vice chancellor and

director, Office of Technology Development. This item was carried over to the May meeting.

Chairman Carter requested Dr. Robert Shelton present the following report to the Board

for approval.

• UNC Campus Scholarships Program

Mr. Carter moved approval of the priorities recommended by the Task Force for the distribution of scholarships: