11
9/28/12 1 Research & Science: Op0mizing Player Performance & Football Field Safety John Sorochan, Ph.D. University of Tennessee Outline Importance of Field Safety Athle<c Field Safety & Playability Center for Athle<c Field Safety Athle<c Field Research Importance 38 million children & adolescents (NIH, 2009) 3.5 million children under 14 receive medical treatment for sports injuries (Safe Kids, 2007) 50% of these injuries are preventable (Brenner, 2007; Safe Kids, 2007) Importance Youth injuries (<14) cost the US public $49,192,781,832 in 1997 Emergency room visits (2004) 116,000 – baseball 186,000 – football AAP, US CPSC, & National Youth Sports Safety Foundation Importance 5.7% of high school football injuries were definitely related to field condi<ons, 15.2% were possibly related to field condi<ons (Harper et al., 1984) 10% of lawsuits related to sports injuries claim that the athle<c field was inadequately maintained (Dougherty, 1988) Accrued Seasons Number of Players Total % of Players AS x NoP 0 368 19.5% 0 1 287 15.2% 287 2 243 12.9% 486 3 205 10.9% 615 4 185 9.8% 740 5 138 7.3% 690 6 111 5.9% 666 7 102 5.4% 714 8 74 3.9% 592 9 59 3.1% 531 10 41 2.2% 410 Average number of accrued seasons for all players on an ac<ve roster on opening day of the 2010 season Data provided by the NFLPA to Jason Lisk, BigLeagueSports™ Average number of accrued seasons for all players on an ac<ve roster on opening day of the 2010 season Accrued Seasons Number of Players Total % of Players AS x NoP 11 24 1.3% 264 12 19 1.0% 228 13 13 0.7% 169 14 9 0.5% 126 15 5 0.3% 75 16 1 0.1% 16 17 1 0.1% 17 18 2 0.1% 36 19 1 0.1% 19 6681 Total 1888 3.54 Data provided by the NFLPA to Jason Lisk, BigLeagueSports™ Importance Average NFL Player at any <me has ~ 3.5 years of experience (Jason Lisk, 2011) Average NFL Player career is ~ 6 years (Jason Lisk, 2011) Why are careers so short? Concussions? Orthopedic injuries? hip://thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/22/nflcareerlengthandaverage ageversusaveragelifeexpectancy/ What is playing quality? Safety and Playability

STC CAFS Presentation compressed

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

1  

Research  &  Science:    Op0mizing  Player  Performance  

&    Football  Field  Safety      

John  Sorochan,  Ph.D.  University  of  Tennessee  

Outline    

•  Importance  of  Field  Safety  •  Athle<c  Field  Safety  &  Playability  •  Center  for  Athle<c  Field  Safety  •  Athle<c  Field  Research  

Importance  •  38  million  children  &  adolescents  

(NIH,  2009)    

•  3.5  million  children  under  14  receive  medical  treatment  for  sports  injuries    

 (Safe  Kids,  2007)    

•  50%  of  these  injuries  are  preventable  (Brenner,  2007;  Safe  Kids,  2007)    

Importance  •  Youth  injuries  (<14)  cost  the  US  public  $49,192,781,832  in  1997  

•  Emergency  room  visits  (2004)  – 116,000  –  baseball  – 186,000  –  football  

AAP, US CPSC, & National Youth Sports Safety Foundation

Importance  •  5.7%  of  high  school  football  injuries  were  definitely  related  to  field  condi<ons,  15.2%  were  possibly  related  to  field  condi<ons    

(Harper  et  al.,  1984)  

•  10%  of  lawsuits  related  to  sports  injuries  claim  that  the  athle<c  field  was  inadequately  maintained    

(Dougherty,  1988)  

Accrued    Seasons  

Number  of    Players  

Total  %  of  Players  

AS  x  NoP  

0   368   19.5%   0  1   287   15.2%   287  2   243   12.9%   486  3   205   10.9%   615  4   185   9.8%   740  5   138   7.3%   690  6   111   5.9%   666  7   102   5.4%   714  8   74   3.9%   592  9   59   3.1%   531  10   41   2.2%   410  

Average  number  of  accrued  seasons  for  all  players  on  an  ac<ve  roster  on  opening  day  of  the  2010  season  

Data  provided  by  the  NFLPA  to  Jason  Lisk,  BigLeagueSports™  

Average  number  of  accrued  seasons  for  all  players  on  an  ac<ve  roster  on  opening  day  of  the  2010  season  

Accrued    Seasons  

Number  of    Players  

Total  %  of  Players  

AS  x  NoP  

11   24   1.3%   264  12   19   1.0%   228  13   13   0.7%   169  14   9   0.5%   126  15   5   0.3%   75  16   1   0.1%   16  17   1   0.1%   17  18   2   0.1%   36  19   1   0.1%   19  

6681  Total   1888   3.54  

Data  provided  by  the  NFLPA  to  Jason  Lisk,  BigLeagueSports™  

Importance  •  Average  NFL  Player  at  any  <me  has  ~  3.5  years  of  experience      (Jason  Lisk,  2011)  

•  Average  NFL  Player  career  is  ~  6  years              (Jason  Lisk,  2011)  

•  Why  are  careers  so  short?  – Concussions?  – Orthopedic  injuries?  

hip://thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/22/nfl-­‐career-­‐length-­‐and-­‐average-­‐age-­‐versus-­‐average-­‐life-­‐expectancy/  

What  is  playing  quality?    

Safety  and  Playability  

Page 2: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

2  

DIFFERENT  SPORTS  

DIFFERENT    SPECIFICATIONS  

Player  to  Surface  Interac<ons  

Surface  hardness,  consistency  &  reliability  

Surface  Hardness   Surface  Hardness  • Ground  Reac<on  Forces  

– The  force  exerted  on  an  athlete  by  the  surface  upon  impact  

(Elnman,  1938;  Nigg  et  al.,  1984;  Brosnan,  2007)  

 

Assessing  Surface  Hardness  

(Rogers  III,  1988)  

Clegg  &  F355  Impact  Soil  Tester    

Tes<ng  Evalua<on  

Page 3: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

3  

–  Data  collected  from  14  professional  and  college  football  games  –  78%  of  traffic  is  concentrated  on  7%  of  the  field  –  Max.  traffic  concentra0on  occurs  at  the  40  yd  line    –  56  cleat  marks  W-­‐2  

Cockerham,  S.T.  1989  

 

Consistency   The  problem  

•  The  zone  of  traffic  concentra<on  (Cockerham,  1989)  

•  Reduces  turf  cover  –  Increases  surface  hardness  – Reduces  trac<on  

(Holmes  and  Bell,  1986)  

•  Increases  poten<al  for  injury  

Cady Traffic Simulator

Trac<on   Trac<on  

Enable  players  to  make  necessary  movements  

(Bell  et  al.,  1985)  

Trac<on    

 

(Middour,  1992;  Nigg  and  Yeadon,  1987;  Wannop  et  al.,  2010)   Assessing  Trac<on  

Tennessee  Athle<c  Field  Tester  

•  Simulates  footstrike    

•  Measures  the  ver<cal  and  horizontal  forces  

Page 4: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

4  

Tennessee  Athle<c  Field  Tester  • Athlete  weight  

–   45  lbs  –  315  lbs  •  Running  

– 1  m/s  

•  Contact  distance  – 230  mm  

TAFT    

Why  is  playing  quality  so  important?  

Importance  •  Poor  playing  quality  of  athle<c  fields  can  nega<vely  impact  player  performance  and  safety  

 

Image  @  espn.com  

(Cockerham  et  al.,  1993)  

Surface  Hardness  

Consistency  

Trac<on!  University of Tennessee

Center for Athletic Field Safety Objectives: •  Determine safest playing surfaces possible

•  Establish safer and higher performance optimums for players

Turf Climates in U.S. •  Adaptation: Cool vs. Warm Season

•  Transition Zone –  37° latitude: 200 miles wide –  Tall fescue

•  Arid/Humid (cool and warm)

The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.

Cool/Arid

Warm/Arid

Cool/ Humid

Cool/Humid

Warm/Humid

*

Page 5: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

5  

CAFS  Sports  Turf  Research  

•  K-12 to Professional Fields •  Basic Management & Safety •  Field Performance •  Shock Attenuation •  Athlete to Surface Interaction  

Ground  Breaking      6-­‐18-­‐2010  

Preparing  the    Varying  

Rootzones  

Liners  and  Drainage    

University of Tennessee Center for Athletic Field Safety - CAFS Center for Athletic Field Safety (CAFS)

Page 6: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

6  

•  72  Plots  (150  W2)  –  12  Synthe0c  –  6  Natural  Turfgrass  (Sand  Based)  

–  Bermudagrass  –  Kentucky  Bluegrass  :  Perennial  Ryegrass  Mixture  

–  6  Natural  Turfgrass  (Soil  Based)  –  Bermudagrass  –  Kentucky  Bluegrass  :  Perennial  Ryegrass  Mixture  

•  10  year  commitment      

Comparing Sports Turf Surfaces Developing  a  Model  to  Predict  Synthe0c  Turfgrass  Surface  Temperature  Using  Atmospheric  Condi0ons    

A.W.  Thoms,  J.T.  Brosnan,  and  J.C.  Sorochan.  University  of  Tennessee,  Knoxville,  TN.  37996    J.M.  Zidek.  ZedX  Incorporated.  Bellefonte,  PA  16823  

40

45

50

55

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Me

an

Te

mp

era

ture

(°F

)

Surface

A  

D  

A  ABC   AB  

D  

A   A  

BCD   CD  

CONCLUSION  Atmospheric  data  can  be  used  to  model  differences  in  synthe<c  turf  surface  temperature  

150  

125  

100  

175  

8  –  Combine  Fields  50  yards  x  5  yards  – 6  Synthe0c  Fields  

– 2  Natural  Turfgrass  Fields  (Sand  Based)  –  Bermudagrass  –  Kentucky  Bluegrass  :  Perennial  Ryegrass  Mixture  

– Proving  grounds  for  player  safety  and  trac0on  –  Footwear  –  Different  surfaces  –  Different  condi0ons  (wet  and  dry,  etc.)  

Athlete Safety & Performance Testing Athlete to Surface Interaction •  Surface  Hardness  •  Surface  Trac0on  •  Interac0on  between  the  two  

X  

Natural  Turf  Research  

Bermudagrass  Varie0es  with  Grooming  &  Overseeding  

Mowing     Football  games  required  for  bermudagrass  to  achieve  70%  cover  for  3  mowing  heights  

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

1/2"

7/8"

1"

Tifway

Page 7: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

7  

Variety  Tes<ng     Overseeding  Rates   Percent turf cover for four bermudagrass varieties after 20 games

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Tifway

Patriot

MS Choice

Riviera

% Cover

Varie

ty

w/ P. Rye w/o P. Rye

Number of football games until 70% cover occurs bermudagrass varieties

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Tifway

Patriot

MS Choice

Riviera

Games

Varie

ty

w/ P. w/o P. 0  

0.5  

1  

1.5  

2  

2.5  

2008   2009  

Leaf  Angle  

Tifway  

Riviera  

Patriot  

Celebra<on  

Leaf angle for cultivar in 2008 and 2009. Knoxville, TN PGR  and  Traffic  

Sports  Turfs  Species  and  Crumb  Rubber  Comparisons   Crumb  Rubber  Topdressing  

Page 8: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

8  

0.75” Crumb Rubber

No Crumb Rubber

Crumb  Rubber  

Vanini  et  al  

Anaylsis

A  Comparison  of  a  Control  Plot  Start            End  

A  Comparison  of  1/4in  Rubber  Plots  Start            End  

A  Comparison  of  1/2in  Rubber  Plots  Start            End  

A  Comparison  of  3/4in  Rubber  Plots  Start            End  

Crumb  Rubber  Study  aner  25  games  

0”  CR   0.25”  CR   0.50”  CR   0.75”  CR  

Determine athlete to surface interaction

Page 9: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

9  

TAFT  –  Tennessee  Athle0c  Field  Tester  

vs

Cleat Type

Kirk et al. (2006) – Proc of Int. Sports Eng. Assc.

Shoe  companies  now  focusing  on  trac<on  

Spring  2012  Pure  Seed  Tes<ng  Overseed  Study  

Study  Descrip<on  

•  To  determine  the  effects  of  different  perennial  ryegrass  varie<es,  seeding  rates,  mowing  heights,  and  surface  moisture  on  athle<c  field  playing  condi<ons  when  used  to  overseed  bermudagrass  athle<c  fields  

Peak  Horizontal  &  Ver<cal  Forces  Tennessee  Athle<c  Field  Tester  (TAFT)  

Nike  Alpha  Vapor  One  Football  Cleats  

500.2  

573.3  

483.8   490.3  

400  

450  

500  

550  

600  

12   24  

Dry  

Wet  

Seeding  Rate  (lbs/1000  W2)  

New

ton's  

Peak  horizontal  force  for  seeding  rate  by  moisture  interac0on  

LSD(0.05)  =  43.1  

585.2  

550.6  

504.6   506.6  

484.2  

436.8  

528.2  

499  

400  

450  

500  

550  

600  

BSG   SDollar   GFox   G22  

Dry  

Wet  

Variety  

New

ton's  

Peak  horizontal  force  for  variety  by  moisture  interac0on  

LSD(0.05)  =  63.3  

Cleat development for athlete safety and optimal traction –  Computer model of expected cleat Dynamics –  Human subject testing

Cleat Type

Introducing the Advanced Dynamic Design of the Black Widow Field Cleat: 8.5mm

Years of development and extensive testing at the Softspikes Advanced Research Center, Boise State University - Center for Orthopaedic & Biomechanics Research, University of Tennessee - Turfgrass

Science & Management, Wayne State University - Advanced Human Modeling Lab/Department of

Biomedical Engineering and High School football programs across the USA have all led to the same conclusion…..

Black Widow Field Cleats provide the ultimate in performance, safety and comfort

Report Introduction:

In the following report we will walk you through the extensive testing performed at these leading Universities using computer monitored traction testing equipment, advanced finite element simulations to determine the effects of shear force reductions and old fashioned athlete performance testing with electronic timing devices to help assess performance improvements……Athlete  performance  on  the  field,  the  ultimate proving ground.

Page 10: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

10  

•  12  current  (2011)  football  players  comple<ng  three  sets  of  <med  agility  tests  

•  Three  NFL  combine  performance  tests    –  40  yard  dash    –  5-­‐10-­‐5  shuile  run  –  Three  cone  drill  

•  Three  cleat  types  –  Dyna-­‐Claw  Performance  Cleat  with  8.5  mm  cleat  –  Dyna-­‐Claw  Performance  Cleat  with  5.0  mm  cleat  –  OEM  13  mm  stud    

•  Athletes  did  not  know  which  cleat  treatment  was  randomly  chosen  for  each  test  event  

Dyna-Claw Performance Cleat Testing

Testing Tasks and Testing Procedures:

• 40 Yard Dash

The 40-yard dash is the marquee event at the NFL combine. It's all about explosion out of the blocks, speed and the ability to carry the speed for an extended distance. Athletes are timed at 10, 20 and 40-yard intervals.

• Shuttle Run (5-10-5)

It is known as the 5-10-5. What it tests is the athlete's lateral quickness and explosion in short areas. The athlete starts in the three-point stance, explodes out 5 yards to his right, touches the line, goes back 10 yards to his left, left hand touches the line, pivot, and run 5 more yards back to the starting point to finish.

• 3 Cone Drill

The 3 cone drill tests an athlete's ability to change directions at a high speed. Three cones placed in an L-shape. The athlete starts from the starting line (first cone), progresses 5 yards to the second cone (base of L) and back. Then, he turns, runs around the second cone, runs a weave around the third cone, which is the high point of the L, changes directions, comes back around the second cone (90 degree turn) and finishes back at the first cone.

Athlete Test Results:

The athlete test results provided below, and the following pages, represents the Fastest Recorded Times each athlete posted in each of the tests. Keep in mind that the tests were random and the rotation of cleats/studs was also random.

92% of the Athletes tested recorded their fastest time using Black Widow Field Cleats

8%

Black WidowField Cleat

OEM Stud

Dyna-Claw Performance Cleat Testing

58% of the Athletes tested recorded their fastest time using Black Widow Field Cleats

67% of the Athletes tested recorded their fastest time using Black Widow Field Cleats

42% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

33% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

Dyna-Claw Performance Cleat Testing

58% of the Athletes tested recorded their fastest time using Black Widow Field Cleats

67% of the Athletes tested recorded their fastest time using Black Widow Field Cleats

42% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

33% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

Dyna-Claw Performance Cleat Testing

Weight Class Comparisons

Data was then organized into weight classes to determine if the Black Widow Field Cleats provided more or less benefits based upon weight of the Athletes. In the charts provided you will note that all weight classes benefited from the use of Black Widow Field Cleats and the majority of athletes in each class recorded their fastest time wearing Black Widow Field Cleats.

32% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

36% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

Dyna-Claw Performance Cleat Testing

Weight Class Comparisons

Data was then organized into weight classes to determine if the Black Widow Field Cleats provided more or less benefits based upon weight of the Athletes. In the charts provided you will note that all weight classes benefited from the use of Black Widow Field Cleats and the majority of athletes in each class recorded their fastest time wearing Black Widow Field Cleats.

32% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

36% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

Dyna-Claw Performance Cleat Testing

If the athlete is a Running Back or Receiver, Defensive Back or Linebacker, Offensive or Defensive Linemen testing results from Boise State University and the University of Tennessee confirm athletes improve their performance in Black Widow Field Cleats.

25% Black Widow FieldCleat

OEM Stud

Dyna-Claw Performance Cleat Testing Human  Test  Subjects  for  Performance  and  Safety  

Human  Test  Subjects  for  Performance  and  Safety  

Page 11: STC CAFS Presentation compressed

9/28/12  

11  

Protec0ng  Athletes  with  Focusing  on  Safe  Equipment  

Sports  Turf  Research  focusing  on  Improving  Player  Performance  &  

Safety  J.C.  Sorochan,  Ph.D.  &  J.T.  Brosnan,  Ph.D.  

Directors  for  the    Center  for  Athle0c  Field  Safety  (CAFS)  

Grounds Managers

Other  shoe  companies  

http://www.turf.tennessee.edu

Thank You