Upload
vonga
View
219
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
5/2/2016
1
Steven K. Grinspoon, MDProfessor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts
Statin Use and Cardiovascular
Disease in HIV
FLOWED: 04/18/16
Los Angeles, California: April 25, 2016
Slide 2 of 36
Statin Use and Cardiovascular Disease in HIV
Steven Grinspoon, M.D.
Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
IAS–USA
April 25, 2016
Slide 3 of 36
Financial Relationships With Commercial Entities
Dr Grinspoon has served as a consultant to
Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Theratechnologies,
Merck & Co, Inc, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. He has
received grants and research support to his
institution from Gilead Sciences, Inc, Kowa
Pharmaceuticals, and Theratechnologies.
(Updated 04/25/16)
5/2/2016
2
Slide 4 of 36
Learning Objectives
After attending this presentation, participants will
be able to:
Describe the current epidemiology of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in HIV
Describe the unique pathophysiology of CVD in HIV
Describe the potential utility and limitations of statin use to prevent CVD in HIV
Slide 5 of 36
Most Epidemiological Studies Suggest
that Rates of CVD in HIV are:
6%
50%
38%
6% 1. Equal to that seen in non HIV
2. 10% higher
3. 50-100% higher
4. 200% higher
Slide 6 of 36
Current Status of CVD Prevention in HIV
• Even as rates of death and mortality related to HIV
have decreased with use of more potent ART,
CVD rates, remain increased among HIV patients
and are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality
• There is limited understanding of the mechanisms
and treatment strategies for CVD in HIV
• No large scale primary CVD prevention strategy
has been tested in HIV
5/2/2016
3
Slide 7 of 36
CVD Risk in HIV-Infected Patients is Beyond
That Predicted by Traditional Risk Factors
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Eff
ec
t S
ize
of
MI
or
CH
Din
HIV
vs
. n
on
HIV
In the VACS cohort, the
HR of MI was 1.48 in HIV
vs. non-HIV veterans
after adjusting for FRS,
comorbidities, and
substance use (95% CI
1.27-1.72).
(Freiberg, 2013)
Slide 8 of 36
Which of the Following is Not a Common
Feature of Coronary Plaque in HIV Patients?
74%
7%
19% 1. Eccentric high risk fatty plaque lesions
2. Inflamed plaque
3. Heavily calcified plaque
Slide 9 of 36
Increased Traditional Risk Factors Account for
Only a Portion of CVD Risk in HIVA
RR 1.75
P<0.0001
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
HIV Non-HIV
Even
ts P
er
1000 P
Ys
• DM, HTN, and dyslipidemia, though increased, accounted for 25% of excess risk
• Newer studies suggest importance of genetics, inflammation and immune dysfunction,
as non traditional risk factors
Triant JCEM 2007, Rotger Clin Infect Dis. 2013
Dyslipidemia
Hypertension
Diabetes
HIV+ non-HIV+
0 5 10 15 20 25
5/2/2016
4
Slide 10 of 36
HIV Infection
CD4+ T
cells
Microbial translocation
Viral reactivation (CMV) and co-infection (HCV)
Chronic activation of T cells and monocytes
Acute MI
Persistent viral infection
Endothelial cell activation
HIV: a State of Immune Activation and
Suppression
Adapted from Hsue JID 2012
Slide 11 of 36
Immune Activation Relates to Novel
Atherosclerotic Phenotype in HIV
• In the general population, MI does not typically result
from gradual expansion of subclinical coronary plaque,
but rather from rupture of vulnerable high risk plaque in
75% of cases
• Recent studies in HIV+ patients without known CVD
demonstrate that atherosclerotic plaques are indeed:
– Inflamed
– Non-calcified, high risk morphology features (vulnerable)
– Associated with immune activation markers
Slide 12 of 36
Increased Arterial Inflammation in HIV
Subramanian JAMA 2012
HIV FRS -Matched
Controls
Aort
ic T
BR
by P
ET
p = 0.0003 p = 0.0003
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0Control HIV
CVD
Controls
5/2/2016
5
Slide 13 of 36
Arterial Inflammation Linked to Immune Activation in HIV
Ao
rtic
(T
BR
)
Natural Log of sCD163 (ng/ml)
ρ=0.53; P-value<0.03
5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.51.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
Slide 14 of 36
Inflamed High Risk Plaque Identified by FDG
Composed of Activated Macrophages
Rudd Circulation 2002
Slide 15 of 36
Increased Rates of Atherosclerosis in HIV by
Coronary CT Angiography
Control HIV P value
Presence of plaque 34% 59% 0.02
Mean plaque volume (µl) 85 173 0.02
Agatson Score 0 (0, 9.9) 0 (0,17.9) 0.29
Segments with plaque 1.2 2.2 0.03
Non-calcified segments 0.46±0.98 0.99±1.57 <0.05
Calcified segments 0.29±0.81 0.26±0.77 0.87
Any stenosis > 70% 0% 6.5% 0.06
Lo AIDS 2010; Post Annals 2014
• Young HIV-infected men and matched controls
• Baseline FRS, FH CHD, and smoking rates similar
• Similar data observed from the MACS cohort
5/2/2016
6
Slide 16 of 36
% o
f su
bje
cts
wit
h h
igh
ris
k m
orp
ho
log
y p
laq
ue
LOW ATTENUATION
PLAQUE (LAP)
POSITIVELY REMODELED
(PR) PLAQUE
Mean minimal attenuation
< 40 Hounsefield Units
Plaque segment /
reference segment > 1.05
RC
A
RC
A
Increased High Risk Morphology
Plaque in HIV Patients
Naghavi Circ 2003, Schoenhanger Circ 2000 &JACC 2001; Zanni AIDS 2013
Slide 17 of 36
Persistent Viral Replication Microbial Translocation
T-cell activation Monocyte Activation
A New Paradigm for Atherogenesis in HIV
↑ High Risk Plaque ↑ Inflammation
RCA
Slide 18 of 36
Current Challenges in Preventing and
Treating CHD in HIV
• Understanding the optimal timing and use of ART to
maximize effects on immune function and minimize
metabolic effects
• Identifying patients with disease: current risk identification
strategies are not adequate
• Developing a safe and effective strategy for primary
prevention, especially for those not identified by current
algorithms, but with substantial subclinical disease
• Developing an intervention that addresses both traditional
and immune-related risk factors
5/2/2016
7
Slide 19 of 36
SMART and START- Effects on CVD
• SMART- Randomized trial of continuous vs.
intermittent ART guided by CD4 count (begun when
<250 and stopped when >350). Stringent viral
suppression reduced AIDS and CVD events.
• START- Randomized trial of immediate vs. delayed
ART in naïve HIV patients with CD4 > 500 (vs.
initiation at CD4 < vs. 350). Earlier initiation reduced
AIDS events but not CVD events.SMART NEJM 2006; START NEJM 2015
Slide 20 of 36
Statins Have the Unique Potential to Work
in HIV Because:
94%
3%
3%
0% 1. They reduce triglycerides
2. They improve glucose simultaneously with lipids
3. They lower LDL
4. They lower LDL and may have anti-inflammatory effects
Slide 21 of 36
Potential Interventions For CVD in HIV
•Traditional Risk Modification Strategies
- Antihypertensive
- Antidiabetic
-ASA
-Statins
•Immune/Inflammatory Modulators
-ART
-CCR5 Antagonists
- IL Antagonists
- Methotrexate
- Statins
5/2/2016
8
Slide 22 of 36
Statin Effects on CVD in non HIV Population
• In a meta-analysis of 26 studies
with 170,000 patients, statins were
shown to reduce events by 22% per
39 mg/dL lowering in LDL
CTT Lancet 2010
Slide 23 of 36
2013 ACC/AHA Statin Guidelines
Stone Circulation 2013
•Unclear how these guidelines
pertain to HIV Patients
•Need for a discussion between
patients and providers
•Need for more data
Slide 24 of 36
Many HIV Patients with High-Risk Plaque would not
Receive Recommendation for Statin by 2013 Guidelines:
CHD risk underestimated by traditional risk scores
Zanni AIDS 2014
5/2/2016
9
Slide 25 of 36
Statins Reduce Vascular Events in Non HIV
Patients with Low LDL and Increased CRP
Events/100p-y:Placebo: 1.36 Rosuva: 0.77HR 0.56
• LDL was reduced 47 mg/dL, and should have resulted in a HR of 0.73 based
on LDL lowering alone, according to CTTC meta-analysis.
• Instead JUPITER showed a HR of 0.56, greater than expected based on
LDL lowering alone
Ridker N Engl J Med 2008; CTTC Lancet 2010
Slide 26 of 36
Statins Address Both Traditional and Immune
Risk Factors in HIVLDL Lowering:
Dampening of Immune Activation:• Decrease monocyte activation reflected in decreased circulating levels of
sCD14 and the macrophage-derived phospholipase Lp-PLA2
Silverberg Ann Int Med 2009, McComsey CROI 2013, Funderburg JAIDS ePUB
• Statins lower LDL by similar amounts in patients with and without HIV: (HIV-
infected: -26.2%; HIV-uninfected: -26.9%)
Slide 27 of 36
Statins are Generally Safe and Well-Tolerated
in HIV
• Despite immune suppressant effects, no adverse effects on viral
replication (Moncunill AIDS 2005, Negredo AIDS 2006)
• Absolute rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse effects on liver and muscle –
low (Silverberg Ann Int Med 2009)
5/2/2016
10
Slide 28 of 36
Newer Statins May Not Increase Glucose and
Not Interact with PIs
Drug PI
Interaction
Effects on
Glucose
LDL Lowering and Dose
Pravastatin (40 mg/d) - - -33 mg/dL, -25%
Atorvastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) + +/- -38 mg/dL, -29%
Rosuvastatin (10 mg/d) + + -28 mg/dL -28%
Pitavastatin (4 mg/d)* - - -48 mg/dL, -28%
Sponseller CROI 2014, Aberg Endo 2013, Eckard JID 2014, Stone JACC 2013
*Among dyslipidemic patients with high starting cholesterol levels.
Pitavastatin metabolized primarily by glucoronidation. Minimally metabolized by CYP3A.
No known interactions with antiretroviral therapy no dose limitations. Included in 2013
ACC/AHA guidelines as a recommended moderate dose statin.
Slide 29 of 36
Statin Effects on Coronary Artery
Plaque in HIV
Lo CROI 2015, Lancet HIV 2015
p = .009 p < .0001 p = .005
Placebo Atorvastatin
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
70
90
110
Pe
rce
nt
Ch
an
ge
in
N
on
ca
lcif
ied
Pla
qu
e
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
Ab
so
lute
Ch
an
ge
in
D
ire
ct
LD
L (
mg
/dL
)
Placebo Atorvastatin -100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
Ch
an
ge
in
Lp
-PL
A2
(ng
/mL
)
Placebo Atorvastatin
p = .009 p < .0001 p = .005
Decreasing non-calcified plaque in proximal left anterior descending (LAD)
coronary artery in patient on atorvastatin for 12 months.
Slide 30 of 36
Need for a Large RCT to Inform Clinical Practice
• HIV patients with low traditional risk scores are at increased risk
for CVD with subclinical plaque and inflammation
• It is unknown if statins will prevent CVD and should be
recommended for the HIV population
• Though largely well tolerated in small studies, there are no data
from large RCTs in HIV investigating efficacy and tolerability
• How will statins uniquely work in HIV?
– LDL lowering
– Effects on inflammatory pathways
30
5/2/2016
11
Slide 31 of 36
100+ Sites Across US, Thailand and Canada
Opened April 2015
www.reprievetrial.org
Slide 32 of 36
REPRIEVE Schema
Intervention
Screeningand
Consent
Pitavastatin Placebo
RandomizationR
Mechanistic Study
Mechanistic
Primary Endpoint Coronary plaque, vascular
Inflammation, immune activation
Asymptomatic HIV patients with no history of CVD and ASCVD < 10%
Primary
Endpoint
Clinical
CVD Death MI Unstable Angina TIA & Stroke Arterial Revasc PAD
N=800, 2 yrs
N=6500, avg. 4-5 yrs
3 visits/year
Lifestyle Advice
Slide 33 of 36
Endpoints• Time to first Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MI,
Stroke, Angina, Revascularization, PAD, CVD death)
• Secondary Endpoints
– AIDS events
– Non AIDS events (liver, kidney, DM)
– Relationship of immune function and LDL to MACE
response
– Safety
5/2/2016
12
Slide 34 of 3634
Objectives:
• To determine:
– Effects on high risk
coronary plaque
– Effects on immune
function in relationship
to plaque
Mechanistic Substudy
• Green + Red: Non-
calcified Plaque Volume:
115 mm3
• Red: Low Attenuation
Plaque Volume: 28 mm3
Slide 35 of 36
Novelty
• First major CVD prevention trial in HIV
• Largest study to date focused on HIV-related CVD;
will inform standard of care
• Represents a new paradigm of long-term prevention
trial for chronic co-morbidities
• Partnership between NHLBI, NIAID and Office of
AIDS Research to fund an important HIV study
Slide 36 of 36
Conclusions and Future Directions
• Traditional and non traditional risk factors contribute to
increased CVD risk in HIV, which manifests as inflamed,
noncalcified high risk plaque in association with immune
activation
• Modulation of traditional and nontraditional risks is
necessary to prevent CVD in HIV
• Statins may be an effective strategy to prevent CVD in HIV
and should be tested in large trials to determine optimal
practice patterns