28
State of Sustainability Today’s sustainable transformations become tomorrow’s traditions 2011-2012 Review Tracy Dixon Director, University Sustainability Office sustainability.ncsu.edu

State of Sustainability - NCSU

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: State of Sustainability - NCSU

State of Sustainability Today’s sustainable transformations become tomorrow’s traditions

2011-2012 Review

Tracy Dixon

Director, University Sustainability Office

sustainability.ncsu.edu

Page 2: State of Sustainability - NCSU

2011-2012 Highlights Campus Environmental Sustainability Team

Page 3: State of Sustainability - NCSU
Page 4: State of Sustainability - NCSU
Page 5: State of Sustainability - NCSU
Page 6: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Academics & Research

Page 7: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Community & Culture

Page 8: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Energy & Water

Page 9: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Green Development

Page 10: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Purchasing & Waste Reduction

Page 11: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Transportation

Page 12: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Sustainability-Related Awards & Events

• Over 50 events

• 7 Campus Awards

• Over 30 contributors to the report

Page 13: State of Sustainability - NCSU

How is NC State Doing?

sustainability.ncsu.edu

Page 14: State of Sustainability - NCSU
Page 15: State of Sustainability - NCSU
Page 16: State of Sustainability - NCSU
Page 17: State of Sustainability - NCSU
Page 18: State of Sustainability - NCSU
Page 19: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Winter Holiday Energy Setback Report

2012-2013

Page 20: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Team Roster

Project Leadership: Jack Colby, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Facilities Operations Project Facilitator: Utilities and Engineering, Energy Management Participating NC State Facilities Teams: Building Maintenance & Operations Campus Enterprises Facilities Operations Carmichael Complex Facilities and Operations Dining and Catering Operations University Athletics University Housekeeping University Housing University Sustainability Office Utilities and Engineering, District Utility Plants

Winter Holiday Energy Setback 2012–2013 Report

Page 21: State of Sustainability - NCSU

• Project Description – The NC State campus closes annually over the Winter Holiday, for an average duration of 10 days.

During this time, building temperature setpoints are lowered, unnecessary lights and equipment are turned off, and doors and windows are closed. The setback temperatures are 60°F to 65°F. This temperature range ensures buildings are not damaged from freezing conditions, while at the same time providing energy conservation. The setback program has been in effect since 2005.

• Business Case – By setting back buildings, NC State can save natural gas and electricity thereby saving costs and lowering

carbon emissions. During the 2012-13 Winter Holiday Energy Setback, $281,774 in energy costs were Avoided. Since the established baseline in 2004, the program has avoided more than $2.1 MM.

• Facility Upgrades – A natural gas fueled 11 megawatt Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant was completed on campus in

2012. CHP is the simultaneous production of electricity and utilization of “waste” heat for the production of steam to heat buildings. The effects from the CHP results are lower electrical consumption and higher natural gas consumption.

• Exception Process – The program has a formal exception process that allows selected buildings and building zones to remain

at normal heat and humidity operating levels through the setback period.

• Education and Outreach – The campus community is informed about the program through email blats and routine media outlets,

such as flyers on campus digital billboards and social media.

Winter Holiday Energy Setback 2012–2013 Report

Program Overview

Page 22: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Winter Holiday Energy Setback 2012–2013 Report

Educational Flyer

Page 23: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Winter Holiday Energy Setback Calendar of Events December 2012 - January 2013

Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday

KEY: LIMITED

OPERATION

KEY: ENERGY SETBACK

4 READING DAY. PLANNING,

TRAINING, AND EDUCATING.

5 FINAL EXAMS

BEGIN.

6 7 8

9 10 EXEMPTION REQUESTS

DEADLINE

11 12 13 FINAL EXAMS

END

14 DORMS CLOSE.

EXEMPTION REQUEST RESULTS.

15 GRADUATION.

DORMS CLOSE FOR GRADUATING STUDENTS.

16 17 GRADES DUE.

SETBACK CLASSROOMS &

RESIDENCE HALLS.

18 19 20 21 SETBACK CAMPUS.

FINAL WALKTHROUGHS.

22 WINTER HOLIDAY BEGINS

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31 1 WINTER HOLIDAY ENDS

2 3 4 SPRING ORIENTATION

5 DORMS REOPEN

6 7 CLASS BEGINS

8 9 10 11 12

Winter Holiday Energy Setback 2012–2013 Report

Page 24: State of Sustainability - NCSU

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Campus Gross Square Footage

Base

line

237

193 154 179 195

307 271

153 224

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Heating Degree Days

Base

line

Winter Holiday Energy Setback 2012–2013 Report

• Growth of NC State’s Campus – NC State is growing at a healthy rate. In 2012

alone, more than 800,000 square feet was added to the campus. Along with this growth, energy consumption naturally tends to grow at a similar rate. In order to compare energy use to prior years, energy consumption per gross square foot (GSF) is the accepted unit of measure.

• The Effect of Heating Degree Days – Heating Degree Days (HDD) are a method of

normalizing energy data for the effects of weather from one year to the next. HDD are calculated by subtracting the average daily temperature from the baseline temperature of 65°F. These values are added together for each winter holiday energy setback period. Colder temperatures equate to a higher HDD which require more energy for heating campus buildings.

– The HDD for the 2012 setback period are just 5.5% less than the baseline year, and therefore, weather is not a major factor in the normalized results this year.

Page 25: State of Sustainability - NCSU

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Campus Electrical Consumption (kWh)

Actual Consumption (kWh)

Normalized Consumption (kWh)

Base

line

• Actual Electricity Consumption – Actual electrical consumption, expressed

as kilowatt-hours (kWh), sharply decreased this year by 50%. The new 11 megawatt CHP Plant on campus that began generating electricity in 2012, and is a contributing factor in the observed electrical consumption decrease. However, the actions taken by the campus community to reduce energy consumption cannot be undervalued.

• Normalized Electric Consumption – Electric consumption is not as weather

dependent as natural gas consumption, but it is affected by the growing campus. Therefore, electrical consumption is normalized for campus gross square footage only. In 2012, the normalized data shows a 64% decrease in electricity consumption compared to the baseline year, and a 41% improvement over last year’s program.

Winter Holiday Energy Setback 2012–2013 Report

Page 26: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Base

line

• Actual Natural Gas Consumption – Actual natural gas consumption,

expressed as total British Thermal Units (BTU), increased this year by 20% compared to the baseline year. The sharp increase in natural gas consumption can largely be attributed to the 11 megawatt CHP plant that is fueled by natural gas.

• Normalized Natural Gas Consumption

– Natural gas consumption expressed as total BTU, is highly weather (temperature and humidity) dependent. It is also affected by the increased campus GSF. For these two reasons, natural gas consumption is normalized for both weather and campus growth.

Winter Holiday Energy Setback 2012–2013 Report

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Campus Natural Gas Consumption (MMBTU)

Actual Consumption (BTU)

Normalized Consumption

Base

line

Page 27: State of Sustainability - NCSU

Base

line

• Energy Cost Avoidance – By comparing the energy consumption to the 2004 baseline year and adding the utility (cost) component, values of

actual dollars saved are calculated. Using this approach, more than $2.1 MM in utility costs have been avoided since 2005. The natural gas fueled CHP plant that came online in 2012 resulted in higher natural gas costs compared to all previous years. This trend in natural gas consumption is expected for the foreseeable future.

Winter Holiday Energy Setback 2012–2013 Report

$223,392

$412,742 $336,762 $340,991

$151,657 $166,271

$290,838 $281,774

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

$350,000

$400,000

$450,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Energy Cost Avoidance to Base Year

Page 28: State of Sustainability - NCSU

• Lessons Learned – Early preparation, coordination, training, and

education is essential to program success. – The first campus announcement e-mail was flagged

as spam in some accounts. To ensure the campus community was aware of the program, a second e-mail was sent out as a “Chancellor’s Memo”. This practice should be followed again next year.