Click here to load reader

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS · PDF file 2019. 1. 8. · Emerald Cities Rhode Island (collectively the Parties). The Efficiency ... ENERGY STAR® Lighting; Energy

  • View

  • Download

Embed Size (px)


  • 1




    COMPANY d/b/a NATIONAL GRID’S 2017 : DOCKET NO. 4654





    I. Introduction

    On October 14, 2016, The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid (National

    Grid or Company) filed with the Public Utilities Commission (PUC or Commission) the Energy

    Efficiency Program Plan for 2017 (2017 Plan or 2017 Efficiency Plan) and its 2017 System

    Reliability Procurement Report (SRP Report). Each was filed as a Stipulation and Settlement

    executed by National Grid, the Division of Public Utilities and Carriers (Division), the Office of

    Energy Resources (OER), the Energy Efficiency and Resources Management Council (EERMC),

    Acadia Center, The Energy Council of Rhode Island (TEC-RI), People’s Power and Light, and

    Emerald Cities Rhode Island (collectively the Parties). The Efficiency Plan and SRP Report were

    submitted: pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 39-1-27.7, which establishes a framework for PUC review

    and approval of such filings, and the Standards for Energy Efficiency and Conservation

    Procurement and System Reliability (Standards), approved by the PUC in Docket No. 4443.1

    The Commission conducted discovery and, on December 8, 2016, had hearings on both the

    2017 Efficiency Plan and the System Reliability Procurement Report. At an Open Meeting on

    December 20, 2016, after review and consideration of the Stipulation and Settlement filings, the

    PUC approved them both. The PUC determined that both the 2017 Energy Efficiency Plan and the

    1 See Commission Order 21767, Docket No. 4443 (Dec. 31, 2014); EERMC-Ord21767_12-31-14.pdf.

  • 2

    SRP Report met the requirements of system reliability and least cost procurement set forth in R.I.

    Gen. Laws §39-1-27.7 as well as the Standards. The PUC concluded that the Settlements were

    reasonable plans and would provide net positive environmental and economic impacts for Rhode


    II. National Grid’s Energy Efficiency Program Plan for 2017

    A. Overview of Costs, Benefits, and Savings

    National Grid noted that the overarching goal of the 2017 Efficiency Plan was to create

    energy savings as well as economic and environmental benefits for Rhode Islanders through the

    procurement of cost-effective energy efficiency measures.2 In support of that goal, the Parties

    proposed a budget of $94.6 million to deliver electric efficiency programs in 2017. Those programs

    are expected to create yearly energy savings of 201,347 MWh and lifetime energy savings of

    2,065,732 MWh.3 The Parties also proposed a budget of $29.7 million to support gas efficiency

    measures projected to create annual savings of 414,606 MMBtu and lifetime savings of 4,945,564

    MMBtu.4 These investments in 2017 are projected to generate $314 million in economic benefits

    over the life of the efficiency measures, with electric efficiency generating $247.9 million in

    economic benefits and gas efficiency adding $66.6 million in economic benefits.5 Additionally,

    the 2017 Efficiency Plan is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emission and avoid 970,894 tons

    of carbon over the lifetime of the measures.6

    2 National Grid’s 2017 Energy Efficiency Program Plan at 1 (Efficiency Plan) (Oct. 17, 2016); 3 Id. at 1 and Table E-2. 4 Id. at 1 and Table G-2. 5 Id. at 1. 6 Id. at 2.

  • 3

    The Parties also agreed that the 2017 Efficiency Plan is cost-effective. Using the Total

    Resource Cost (TRC) Test, 7 the Company calculated a benefit-cost ratio of 2.0 for electric

    efficiency programs. That means that for each dollar invested, electric programs will generate

    $2.00 of economic benefits over the lifetime of the investment.8 The 2017 Plan projected an overall

    gas efficiency program benefit-cost ratio of 1.63.9

    The Company asserted that the 2017 Plan satisfied the statutory requirement that the cost

    of procuring energy efficiency, as provided for in the plan, is less expensive than the cost of

    procuring an equivalent amount of energy supply. The Company calculated the cost of electric

    efficiency at $.0579 per lifetime kWh saved, which was $.0349 less than the estimated cost of

    supply, which was $.0928 per kWh.10 The cost of gas efficiency was calculated at $7.96 per

    lifetime of MMBtu saved, which was $0.85 less that the cost of supply for residential heating

    customers, $8.81 per MMBtu.11

    B. Programs

    The Parties proposed to continue most of the 2016 efficiency programs for the various rate

    classes into 2017.12 The Efficiency Plan, however, contemplated three significant departures from

    previously approved plans.

    7 The 2015-2017 Least Cost Procurement Standards, which were approved by the PUC in Docket No. 4443,

    authorizes the use of the TRC Test. 8 Efficiency Plan at 3. 9 Id. 10 Id. The numbers are based on the kWh saved over the aggregated lifetime of the Efficiency Plan. 11 Id. 12 For a summary of programs included in the 2016 Efficiency Plan that were not included in the 2017 Efficiency Plan see, National Grid’s Resp. COMM 1-3; An overview of the programs was included in Tables E-2 and G-2 of the settlement filing and the specific programs were set forth in detail in the Efficiency Plan. The non-income eligible residential programs are: (1) Residential New Construction; (2) Energy Star® HVAC; (3) EnergyWise; (4) EnergyWise Multi-Family; (5) Energy Star® Lighting; (6) Residential Consumer Products; (7) Home Energy Reports; (8) Energy Efficiency Education Programs; (9) Residential Demonstration and R&D; (10) Community Based Initiatives – Residential; and (11) Comprehensive Marketing – Residential. The income eligible residential programs are: (1) Single Family – Income Eligible Services; and (2) Income Eligible Multi-Family. The commercial and residential programs are: (1) Large Commercial New

  • 4

    First, incentives for compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) that were offered in 2016 were not

    offered in the 2017 Plan. The Company explained that most CFL lighting will no longer meet

    voluntary efficiency standards established by the United States Environmental Protection

    Agency.13 Other products with advanced technology-light emitting diode (LED) products-have

    decreased in price significantly and provide better lighting.14 For these reasons, the 2017 Plan

    discontinued incentives for CLFs in residential programs.15 Similarly, commercial and industrial

    programs, except for the Small Business program, would no longer incentivize fluorescent lamps

    and luminaries.16

    Second, the 2017 Plan proposed several enhanced financing opportunities to help

    municipal, commercial, and industrial customers overcome cost barriers that affect investments in

    energy efficiency. The Company currently offers financing for large and small customers through

    on-bill repayment from its revolving loan fund.17 The Company proposed an additional $1.8

    million for its electric and gas revolving loan funds as follows: $1.3 million from electric

    ratepayers, with $1 million for large commercial and industrial customers and $0.3 million for

    small commercial and industrial customers; and $0.5 million from gas ratepayers.18

    At the request of the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank (Infrastructure Bank), the Company

    also proposed a $5 million transfer to the Infrastructure Bank to support municipal energy

    Construction; (2) Large Commercial Retrofit; (3) Small Business Direct Install; and (4) Commercial Demonstration and R&D. Efficiency Plan at Tables E-2 and G-2. 13 ENERGY STAR® is an EPA voluntary program that helps businesses and individuals save money and protect

    climate through superior energy efficiency; 14 National Grid’s Resp. to COMM 1-3. 15 The following programs would no longer support CFLs: ENERGY STAR® Lighting; Energy Wise Single Family,

    Multi-Family and Income Eligible Multi-Family; Residential New Construction; and Income Eligible Services. Id. 16 National Grid’s Resp. to COMM 1-4. According to the Company, projects that only install LED lighting may not

    be cost-effective for small businesses. 17 Efficiency Plan at Tables E-10 and G-10. 18 Id.

  • 5

    efficiency upgrades financed through the Efficient Building Fund.19 The Company stated that it

    would not administer any of these funds but would collaborate with the Infrastructure Bank to

    develop reporting metrics and to ensure that the funds were achieving energy efficiency goals.20

    In addition, the Company stated that that it would support energy efficiency in municipalities by

    offering technical assistance, energy audits, and existing ene

Search related